Skip to main content
Springer logoLink to Springer
. 2026 Mar 23;125(1):49. doi: 10.1007/s00436-026-08653-x

Inter-stock congruence of long-term changes in macroparasite communities of a small pelagic fish ¿An effect of climate change?

Paula Marcotegui 1,✉, Matías Merlo 1, María P Gutiérrez 1, Delfina Canel 1, Claudio Buratti 2, Manuela Parietti 2, Timi Juan 1
PMCID: PMC13009072  PMID: 41870629

Abstract

The impact of climate change on the distribution and sustainability of pelagic fish remains poorly understood, even though it can cause drastic shifts in species distribution, reproduction, migratory behavior, and recruitment. In turn, parasites can reveal important details about the biology of their hosts and the changes they undergo. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether changes occurred in the parasite community structure of the Argentine anchovy, Engraulis anchoita, after three decades, during which environmental changes have been documented in the Argentine Sea. Parasite assemblages of anchovies captured throughout their distribution in the Argentine Sea in 2022 were examined and compared with those of anchovies collected in the same regions between 1993 and 1995. Multivariate analyses were performed by assigning fish to three spatial groups (belonging to two different stocks), identified from the first sampling period (Northern Buenos Aires, Southern Buenos Aires, and Patagonian). The dataset included 42,290 metazoan parasites belonging to 13 species. Samples differed significantly among groups and between periods. A decrease in parasite abundances was observed for most species across all three groups, resulting in similar patterns of dissimilarity between periods. The congruence of these changes across three groups over a broad geographic scale suggests that such variations are likely driven by large-scale processes, possibly climate change, rather than by random, short-term, cyclical, or local variability.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00436-026-08653-x.

Keywords: Engraulis anchoita, Parasite indicators, Temporal variations, Ocean warming, Southwestern Atlantic Ocean

Introduction

Marine ecosystems are expected to be affected by anthropogenic climate change, which is projected to lead to ocean warming, acidification, deoxygenation, and reductions in near-surface nutrients (Kwiatkowski et al. 2020; Marcogliese 2025). Accordingly, the pelagic zone, and its mid-trophic level fauna are expected to be impacted (Ariza et al. 2022) as a direct consequence of changes in their metabolic needs and their interspecific interactions such as competition or predation (Lefort et al. 2015), but also indirectly through the influence of environmental variables on phytoplankton and zooplankton assemblages (Benedetti et al. 2021).

Despite the world importance of pelagic fisheries, the environmental drivers of spatial distribution limits and population fluctuations remain not well understood for many species (Muhling et al. 2017). This is because because many species have high migratory capabilities and mobility, being able to move away from temporarily unsuitable habitats. Therefore, projecting climate impacts has been particularly difficult for small coastal species (such as anchovies and sardines), characterized by population fluctuations spanning orders of magnitude due to periods of continuous high and low spawning stock biomass (Swalethorp et al. 2022), short generation times and large interannual fluctuations of abundance in a boom-and-bust dynamics. Consequently, the direction and magnitude of the impact of climate change on pelagic fishes is still uncertain and still not corroborated by observation-based statistical studies (Ariza et al. 2022).

The Argentine anchovy is one of the most important pelagic fishery resources inhabiting the Argentine Sea. It has a wide distribution on the continental shelf, reaching latitudes south of the San Jorge Gulf, in Patagonian waters (47°30’ S) (Angelescu and Cousseau 1967). Two stocks have been historically considered in the region, a Northern and a Southern or Patagonian stock, separated at approximately 41° S (Hansen 1994; Timi 2003). Recently the presence of a third stock in the San Matias Gulf has been proposed, based on parasitological evidence (Marcotegui et al. 2024) and daily length growth of anchovies juveniles (Brown et al. 2014). This is the most abundant pelagic species in the southwest Atlantic Ocean (Defeo and Vasconcellos 2020), where also represents a key role in the regional trophic web as the main prey of other valuable fishery resources, as well as for marine birds and mammals (Angelescu 1982; Yorio et al. 2017; Ciancio et al. 2018, 2021; Machovsky-Capuska et al. 2020). Therefore, and due to their biomass, anchovies play an important role in the ecosystem, exerting major control on the dynamics of upper and lower trophic levels (del Favero et al. 2017).

Like other small pelagic fish species, theArgentine anchovy exhibits considerable year to year variability in abundance (Parietti et al. 2025), which affects other trophic levels in the food chain (Cury et al. 2000) and its populations are likely affected by long-term regime shifts (Auad and Martos 2012).

In the Southwestern Atlantic, the Brazil Current, composed by subtropical waters influencing the oceanography north of the Argentine Sea, has been reported as one of the most extensive and intense surface warming hotspots in the global ocean (Hobday and Pecl, 2014; Franco et al. 2020a). The Brazil Current has intensified and shifted southward, causing significant warming in the Southern Brazilian Bay and the Río de la Plata (Franco et al. 2020b). Between 2003 and 2017, warming reached up to 1 °C per decade, affecting both coastal waters and deeper layers (Franco et al. 2020a). The entire Río de la Plata water column is warming (> 0.4 °C/decade), and surface isotherms are moving south (Franco et al. 2020b), and marine heatwaves in the area have also become more frequent, longer, and more intense, particularly since 2000 (Luz Clara et al. 2025). This rise of sea temperatures in northern Argentina has affected the distribution of some fisheries and the composition of the captures in the region (Franco et al. 2020b), dealing with pronounced tropicalization of demersal species since 2013 (Gianelli et al. 2019; Alvarez Perez and Sant’Ana 2022). Similarly, in Patagonian waters, two opposite trends in sea surface temperature have been recorded in the last decade: a warming area between 42° − 45° S, and a cooling area between 49° − 52° S (Risaro et al. 2022). Additionally, a breakpoint with a constant increase in positive temperature anomalies for the region, has been detected in the area (Parietti et al. 2025). All these environmental changes could be affecting the anchovy populations, generating the need to assess the effects of future environmental changes on resource availability and fishery management.

Parasites with complex life cycles are particularly susceptible to environmental threats (Marcogliese 2001; Sures et al. 2023),with those species infecting ectothermic hosts being at greatest risk(Harvell et al. 2002a, b; Cizauskas et al. 2017). Therefore, parasitic organisms offer excellent systems for measuring and monitoring such effects (Marcotegui et al. 2025). Unfortunately, the impacts of climate change on parasite diversity remains mostly undocumented (Carlson et al. 2017; Wood 2025) with variable responses beingrecorded (Fiorenza et al. 2020; Welicky et al. 2021; Preisser et al. 2022; Wood and Vanhove 2023). However, alterations in the composition and structure of parasite assemblages are a likely outcome influenced by global change factors (Marcotegui et al. 2025). A remarkableexample in the study area is a digenean parasite of anchovies as larvae and of penguins as adults, Cardiocephaloides physalis, that has shown a significant decline in its abundance and become extinct in some areas in recent decades (Marcotegui et al. 2025). This is not the first change in parasitism recorded regionally, as several parasites of a coastal fish, Cynoscion guatucupa, have either increased or declined in abundance during the same period (Lanfranchi et al. 2024).

Ideally, to identify the ongoing changes in parasitism and to understand their causes, the temporal trajectory of multiple parasite species should be addressed (Wood 2025). Therefore, in this work, other parasites of E. anchoita are analyzed, at different latitudes, with the aim to assess possible changes on the parasite communities by comparing with previous data in different stocks along the Argentine Sea.

Materials and methods

Anchovy samples were obtained from both research cruises and commercial catches between August and November 2022 at different latitudes in the Argentine Sea (Fig. 1; Table 1). A total of 207 anchovies with total length ≥ 120 mm were sampled, prior assignment to the two known stocks in the Argentine Sea, the North and the Patagonian (P) (Hansen et al. 1984; Hansen 2004) from where previous samples were available. Following Timi (2003), samples from the Northern stock were in turn divided into two groups: North Bonaerense (NB) and South Bonaerense (SB) which resulted in parasitologically homogeneous groups during the first period. Samples of the recently proposed stock from San Matías Gulf and adjacent waters (Marcotegui et al. 2024) were not considered. Fish were deep frozen on board and preserved at −18 °C until examination. After thawing, fish were measured for total length (TL) in mm. Data of 520 anchovies caught between 1993 and 1995 from a previous work (Timi 2003) were used for comparative purposes, following the same geographical design. For most analyses, samples from NB and SB groups, captured in different years, were pooled together (Fig. 1; Table 1).

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Distribution map of Engraulis anchoita samples. Samples colored by stock, period and year. NB: North Bonaerense, SB: South Bonaerense, P: Patagonia. First period: reddish circles; second period: bluish circles

Table 1.

Composition of samples of Argentine anchovy, Engraulis anchoita from three samples and two temporal periods (data of pooled samples of different years in bold)

Stock Sample Date Latitude S Longitude W Capture N Lt (mm) ± S.D.
North Bonaerense NB1 1993–1995 37°57’00’’−38° 55’00’’ 56°47’0’’−59°01’0’’ RC 188 145.6 ± 14.3
NB-93 Nov. 1993 38°51’00’’−38°55’00’’ 58°21’0’’−59°01’0’’ RC 105 148.3 ± 11.0
NB-94 Aug. 1994 37°57’00’’ 56°47’0’’ RC 48 140.8 ± 16.0
NB-95 Sep. 1995 38°51’00’ 58°43’0’’ RC 35 143.9 ± 18.7
South Bonaerense SB1 1994–1995 40°15’06’’−40°26’03’’ 61°03’02’’−61°03’12’’ RC 144 157.48 ± 14.9
SB1-94 Aug. 1994 40°15’06’’ 61°03’02’’ RC 102 163.3 ± 12.4
SB1-95 Oct. 1995 40°26’03’’ 61°03’12’’ RC 42 143.3 ± 10.4
Patagonian P1 Nov./Dec. 1993 43°22’36’’−45°22’00’’ 63°13’00’’−66°43’00’’ RC 188 161.7 ± 14.8
North Bonaerense NB2 Aug. 2022 38°49’03’’ 58°07’28’’ CO 38 146.5 ± 14.6
South Bonaerense SB2 Aug. 2022 39°81’00’’ 60°42’00’’ RC 34 143.5 ± 14.8
Patagonian P2 Jul/Aug. 2022 43°07’00’- 43°07’24’S 64°22’24’−64°28’0’S RC/CO 135 145.8 ± 13.8

CO: commercial fishery; RC: research cruise; S.D.: Standard Deviation

Each fish was dissected under a stereoscopic microscope. The body surface, eyes, gills, branchial and body cavities, viscera (stomach, intestine, liver, heart, gonads and mesenteries), gas bladder, kidneys, and musculature were examined separately. Macroparasites were recovered from gills, body cavities, stomach, pyloric caeca, and intestine, counted and identified following standard procedures for each taxon (Pritchard and Kruse 1982; Berland 1984).

Fish length was compared across samples by a Kruskal-Wallis One Way Analysis of Variance on Ranks (1 × 6 factorial design, ‘sample’ as fixed factor) (Zar 1999), followed by post-hoc Dunn’s pairwise tests (Dunn 1964). Prevalence and mean abundance (sensu Bush et al. 1997) were calculated for each parasite species in each sample. No microparasites (myxozoans and coccidians), previously reported from anchovies (Timi and Sardella 1998), were considered for the analysis because they can not be counted and only presence-absence data are available.

The species richness (S) was calculated for each individual fish (infracommunity sensu Bush et al. 1997) and the Brillouin´s indices of diversity (HB) and evenness (E) for those anchovies harboring at least 2 parasite species (Magurran 1988). For each group, the abundance of those species with prevalence higher than ten in at least one sample, as well as the infracommunity descriptors were compared between periods by one-way permutational multivariate analysis of the variance (PERMANOVA, Anderson et al. 2008) based on Euclidean distances and including TL as a co-variable and “sample” as a factor (1 × 2 factorial design). Following Anderson et al. (2008) a permutation of residuals under a reduced model was used as a method of permutation. A sequential sum of squares (Type I SS) was applied because TL was introduced as a covariable.

Multivariate analyses were used to assess if parasite communities showed similar or disparate temporal patterns across the three groups. For this, Bray-Curtis similarity indices (Magurran 1988) on parasite abundance were calculated between all possible pairs of hosts. The similarity of parasite infracommunities across samples was evaluated, previous square-root transformation of data to down-weight the importance of very abundant species so that the less dominant species played some role in determining similarity among samples (Clarke and Gorley 2015).

A non-parametric multidimensional scaling (nMDS, Clarke and Gorley, 2015) was performed to assess potential geographic or temporal variations across samples. The distances between the centroids of each sample were plotted by bootstrap averaging the original dataset (50 iterations with replacement) to show differences among samples more clearly (Clarke and Gorley 2015). For this, mean values were visualised in nMDS plots, using as many dimensions as necessary in order to match the original data matrix as closely as possible (setting a ρ = 0.99 correlation coefficient), and their fitting was quantified by means of a stress value. The analysis was carried out considering the annual samples from the first period both individually and combined.

The influence of the origin of assemblages was further analyzed by means of canonical analysis of principal coordinates (CAP) (Anderson and Willis 2003), testing for significant differences by a permutation “trace” test, after 9999 permutations. Over-parameterization was prevented by choosing the number of PCO axes (m) that maximized success on a “leave-one-out” allocation to groups cross-validation method (Anderson and Robinson 2003).

As both nMDS and CAP analyses do not take into account the influence of host size on the significance of the differences among samples, the differences in infracommunity structure between samples were tested using a one-way PERMANOVA on the Bray-Curtis dissimilarity matrix, in a similar way than in the case of infracommunity descriptors. Because PERMANOVA is sensitive to differences in multivariate dispersion between groups (sensu homogeneity of variances, which can inflate Type I error even when centroids have identical locations), the same models were tested for differences in dispersion using the routine PERMDISP (Anderson et al. 2008). Dispersions were measured as distance to the centroid, and each term in the analysis was tested using 9999 permutations.

At the component community level (Bush et al. 1997), an nMDS was performed on the Bray-Curtis similarity index on square root-transformed data of prevalence. A hierarchical agglomerative clustering was applied to the component communities using group-average linking, and resemblance levels were overlaid on the nMDS plot (Clarke and Gorley 2015).

All similarity and distance measures, as well as all multivariate analyses, were implemented in PRIMER V7 and PERMANOVA + for PRIMER package (Anderson et al. 2008; Clarke and Gorley 2015).

Results

Significant differences in fish length were observed across samples (H(5): 149.8, P < 0.01), due to pairwise differences between anchovies from P1 and SB1 regarding all the other samples (all P < 0.05) (Table 1).

A total of 10 parasite species were found in the whole sample, totalizing 2898 individuals, with no parasite-free anchovy individuals observed. Variable values of prevalence (Table 2) and mean abundance (Table 3) were observed across samples. Considering the seven species selected (Table 4), thirteen of the 20 comparisons between periods showed significant differences in abundance. Three species showed significant changes in their abundance across the two periods analysed in all anchovy populations. Specifically, the abundance of P. heterocotyle and S. polymorphus decreased, whereas that of Anisakis sp. increased during the same time frame. The highest number of differences were observed for anchovies from NB and P samples (5 species), with only three species differing in SB. Hysterothylacium aduncum was the only species with similar abundance between periods in all the samples. The lack of influence of fish size was noteworthy for adult, short-lived, parasites. Burdens of larval parasites, on the other hand, depended largely on fish length in most cases, evidencing significant interaction with the period of sampling. The results of all PERMANOVAs are given as Online Resource (Table S1).

Table 2.

Microhabitat and prevalence (%) of macroparasites of Engraulis anchoita across six samples from the Argentine Sea caught at two periods (1993–1995 and 2022)

Parasite Microhábitat NB1 SB1 P1 NB2 SB2 P2
Monogenea
Pseudanthcotyloides heterocotyle Gills 19.2 19.4 9.6 - - 1.5
Mazocraes australis Gills 5.8 5.6 5.3 - 2.9 3.0
Digenea
Lecithochirum microstomum Stomach 62.8 59.7 25.5 2.6 - 1.5
Parahemiurus merus Stomach 14.4 11.1 - - 2.9 -
Cestoda
Diphlyllobothriidae gen sp. Body cavity - 0.7 - - - -
Bothriocephalus sp. Pyloric caeca - 0.7 1.1 - - 2.2
Scolex polymorphus Intestine 94.7 95.1 85.1 52.6 20.6 29.6
Nematoda
Hysterothylacium aduncum Body cavity 49.5 78.5 84.6 94.7 97.1 89.6
Contracaecum sp. Body cavity 68.1 32.5 81.9 28.9 38.2 48.9
Anisakis sp. Body cavity 3.7 11.1 44.1 10.5 17.7 65.2
Terranova galeocerdonis Body cavity 0.5 - - - - -
Acanthocephala
Corynosoma australe Body cavity 5.8 2.1 0.5 - 2.9 -
Copepoda
Nothobomolochus cresseyi Gills 1.1 0.7 0.5 - - -

NB: North Bonaerense; SB: South Bonaerense; P: Patagonian; 1: first period (1993–1995); 2: second period (2022)

Table 3.

Mean abundance ± standard deviation of macroparasites of Engraulis anchoita across six samples from the Argentine Sea caught at two periods (1993–1995 and 2022)

Parasite NB1 SB1 P1 NB2 SB2 P2
Pseudanthcotyloides heterocotyle 0.36 ± 0.97 0.28 ± 0.69 0.15 ± 0.54 - - 0.21 ± 0.12
Mazocraes australis 0.11 ± 0.61 0.07 ± 0.30 0.11 ± 0.74 - 0.09 ± 0.51 0.04 ± 0.27
Lecithochirum microstomum 4.40 ± 11.15 7.34 ± 38.48 2.65 ± 9.88 0.03 ± 0.16 - 0.02 ± 0.19
Parahemiurus merus 0.20 ± 0.60 0.17 ± 0.527 - - 0.03 ± 0.17 -
Diphlyllobothriidae gen sp. - 0.01 ± 0.08 - - - -
Bothriocephalus sp. - 0.02 ± 0.25 0.07 ± 0.81 - - 0.04 ± 0.26
Scolex polymorphus 30.18 ± 37.01 29.21 ± 32.99 13.57 ± 14.71 9.47 ± 11.36 3.62 ± 8.056 6.26 ± 15.96
Hysterothylacium aduncum 4.44 ± 15.59 15.06 ± 35.60 29.90 ± 50.07 4.79 ± 4.33 8.71 ± 10.81 8.83 ± 12.94
Contracaecum sp. 1.78 ± 2.40 3.87 ± 3.26 2.81 ± 2.53 1.24 ± 2.58 2.56 ± 4.86 2.44 ± 5.22
Anisakis sp. 0.05 ± 0.28 0.18 ± 0.72 0.96 ± 1.57 0.24 ± 0.79 0.35 ± 1.04 3.14 ± 5.18
Corynosoma australe 0.07 ± 0.298 0.03 ± 0.20 0.01 ± 0.07 - 0.06 ± 0.34 -
Nothobomolochus cresseyi 0.01 ± 0.10 0.01 ± 0.08 0.01 ± 0.07 - - -

NB: North Bonaerense; SB: South Bonaerense; P: Patagonian; 1: first period (1993–1995); 2: second period (2022)

Table 4.

Significance levels (Pperms) of comparisons between two periods (1993–1995 and 2022) of abundance of selected macroparasites of Engraulis anchoita across three groups from the Argentine Sea caught

Variable NB SB P
TL Period TLxPeriod TL Period TLxPeriod TL Period TLxPeriod
Pseudanthcotyloides heterocotyle 0.052 0.020↓ 0.329 0.944 0.016↓ 0.667 0.715 0.002↓ 0.466
Lecithochirium microstomum 0.461 0.027 0.700 0.543 0.164 0.392 0.056 0.0001 0.003
Parahemiurus merus 0.434 0.037 0.707 0.292 0.248 0.488 - - -
Scolex polymorphus 0.331 0.001↓ 0.611 0.021 0.001↓ 0.628 0.0002 0.003↓ 0.131
Hysterothylacium aduncum 0.0001 0.998 0.041 0.0001 0.167 0.036 0.0001 0.435 0.0001
Contracaecum sp. 0.0001 0.164 0.070 0.0001 0.974 0.128 0.0001 0.011 0.018
Anisakis sp. 0.013 0.016↑ 0.037 0.018 0.038↑ 0.320 0.503 0.0001↑ 0.333

NB: North Bonaerense; SB: South Bonaerense; P: Patagonia. Upward-pointing arrows indicate increases, while downward-pointing arrows signify decreases

At the infracommunity level (Fig. 2), the species richness was significantly affected by anchovy size and differed significantly between periods, being higher in the first period (Fig. 2a), with no interaction between both factors, in all the three samples (all Pperm<0.01, Online Resource Table S2). PERMDISP analyses showed no differences in multivariate dispersions between samples from SB (F1,176: 1.24; Pperm >0.05) and P (F1,321: 0.87; Pperm >0.05), being different those from NB (F1,224: 4.85; Pperm =0.04). The Brillouin diversity index (Fig. 2b), on the other hand, was also affected by anchovy size in the three samples (all Pperm<0.01) but only differed between periods in SB (Pperm=0.03), with no interaction between both factors (all Pperm>0.01, Online Resource). Multivariate dispersions also varied for comparisons in SB (F1,160: 1.24; Pperm =0.02), not differing in NB (F1,202: 0.55; Pperm >0.05) nor in P (F1,293: 3.31; Pperm >0.05). In the case of evenness (Fig. 2c), the anchovy size had an effect in comparisons from NB and P (Pperm=0.04 and Pperm<0.01, respectively), but not in SB (Pperm>0.05). Multivariate dispersions did not vary for comparisons in NB (F1,201: 0.06; Pperm=0.81) and SB (F1,160: 3.31; Pperm =0.10), but differed in P (F1,293: 12.95; Pperm <0.01).

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

Comparative parasitic community metrics of Engraulis anchoita between Period 1 (1993–1995) and Period 2 (2022) across the three spatial groups: Northern Buenos Aires (NB), Southern Buenos Aires (SB), and Patagonian (P). Panels show (a) Brillouin diversity, b Brillouin evenness, and (c) species richness

When the annual samples from the first period were analyzed individually, the bootstrap-average-based nMDS ordination showed an apparent separation of samples according to their period of capture (Fig. 3), with a low value of stress (0.03). Samples from the first period were located at the left of the biplot, with an ordered north-south sequence along the first axis. Those of different years from NB clustered close to each other and together to SB from 1995. In the new period, the most different anchovies were those from P. A similar picture was observed when the samples of different years were pooled in both north Bonaerense samples (Fig. 4).

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

Non-metric multi-dimensional scaling plot (nMDS) of bootstrap averages (50 repetitions) of parasite infracommunities in nine samples of Engraulis anchoita caught in the Argentine Sea, based on Bray-Curtis dissimilarity of square root-transformed data of abundance. Black full symbols represent the overall centroids across all repetitions. Samples identified by Locality Code-Period/Year. Locality Code: NB: North Bonaerense, SB: South Bonaerense, P: Patagonia

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4

Non-metric multi-dimensional scaling plot (nMDS) of bootstrap averages (50 repetitions) of parasite infracommunities in six samples of Engraulis anchoita caught in the Argentine Sea, based on Bray-Curtis dissimilarity of square root-transformed data of abundance. Black full symbols represent the overall centroids across all repetitions. Samples identified by Locality Code-Period. Locality Code: NB: North Bonaerense, SB: South Bonaerense, P: Patagonia

Indeed, higher differences were observed for samples of the same stocks between different periods, than between stocks of the same period, judging by the distances between centroids (Fig. 5), although both P samples were more similar to each other than their B counterparts.

Fig. 5.

Fig. 5

Distance between centroids treemap based on bootstrap averaging (50 iterations with replacement) of nMDS analyses on parasite abundance in six samples of Engraulis anchoita in the Argentine Sea. Blue: between periods for each group; brown: between groups from the first period; green: between groups from the second period. The bigger the square, the larger the distance

The CAP analysis on parasite abundance showed a relatively low percentage of correct allocations (48.69%), although it was considerably higher than the value expected by chance alone (21.24%). Cross-validation results (Table 5) showed that the lowest percentages of allocation were between both B samples of each period, but the percentages improved considerably for all samples when anchovies were allocated to their period of capture rather than to their sample site.

Table 5.

Results of cross validation (leave-one-out allocation of individual anchovies to one of six samples) for the canonical analysis of principal coordinates (CAP) of parasite assemblages of Engraulis anchoita in six samples from the Argentine Sea. Rows correspond to group memberships, including the percentage of correctly classified fish to their own stock or period of capture. In bold the higher number of allocated anchovies to each sample and the highest percentage of correct allocations

Origin group % correct allocations to same
NB1 SB1 P1 NB2 SB2 P2 Sample Stock Period
NB1 128 35 12 8 4 1 68.08 72.34 93.08
SB1 62 41 32 5 2 2 28.47 31.25 93.75
P1 34 28 82 11 6 27 43.62 57.98 76.60
NB2 4 9 2 4 15 4 10.53 21.05 60.53
SB2 2 2 3 2 21 4 61.76 67.65 79.41
P2 2 12 12 8 23 78 57.78 59.26 80.74

The results of PERMANOVA analyses (Table 6) showed a significant effect of host length on the response variables and an interaction between the host length and sample, indicating that the nature of the relationship between the covariate and the multivariate response differed within different levels of the factor. Furthermore, taking into account the variations among samples due to fish size, significant differences were detected among the parasite assemblages. Post-hoc pairwise comparisons showed significant differences for all comparisons (t: 2.21–13.07; all Pperm< 0.01). Significant differences in the multivariate dispersions were observed across samples (F5,721: 5.06; Pperm <0.001), with five pairs of samples differing from each other, namely NB1-P2 (t: 3.37; Pperm <0.01), SB1-P1 (t: 2.78; Pperm <0.01), SB1-NB2 (t: 2.23; Pperm =0.03), SB1-P2 (t: 5.14; Pperm <0.001) and P1-P2 (t: 2.36; Pperm =0.03).

Table 6.

One-factor PERMANOVA results comparing square-root transformed abundance data of parasites of Engraulis anchoita in six samples from the Argentine Sea, based on the Bray-Curtis dissimilarity measure, with host length as co-variable. P-values obtained after 9999 permutations

Source d.f. SS MS Pseudo F P (perm)
Host length 1 1.02e5 1.02e5 82.72 < 0.001
Sample 5 3.65e5 72,951 59.37 < 0.001
Host length x Sample 5 25,786 5157.3 4.20 < 0.001
Residual 715 8.78e5 1228.7
Total 726 1.37e6

The nMDS and cluster analyses carried out at the level of component communities (Fig. 6) showed a similar pattern to those of infracommunities. Indeed, the sampling period prevailed over the sample sites in terms of similarity across samples, with a stress value of 0. When vectors corresponding to Pearson correlations of selected species were superimposed with the nMDS, H. aduncum and Anisakis sp. were associated to recent samples, whereas all the rest were indicators of parasite assemblages of the first period.

Fig. 6.

Fig. 6

Non-metric multi-dimensional scaling plot (nMDS) and cluster analysis of parasite component communities in samples of Engraulis anchoita caught in the Argentine Sea, based on Bray-Curtis dissimilarity of square root-transformed data prevalence. Stress value = 0

Discussion

Climate change is expected to influence multiple characteristics of the pelagic marine environment, such as temperature, circulation, chemistry (pH), stratification, productivity and oxygen availability (Muhling et al. 2017); whose shifts may produce changes in spatial redistribution and ecological interactions of pelagic fishes (Muhling et al. 2017; Sarre et al. 2024). The observed temporal patterns in the populations and communities of parasites de E. anchoita, are likely a consequence of these processes. Indeed, the loss of biodiversity is generally considered to lead to decreases in parasite diversity (Lafferty 2012; Marcogliese 2023), which, however, would depend also on differential characteristics of parasites, particularly their specificity and the complexity of their life cycles (Lafferty 2012; Wood 2025).

In the present paper, except for the diphyllobothriid and copepod species, which were found at very low prevalence during the first period, the rest of species were present in the recent samples. However, like C. physalis (see Marcotegui et al. 2025), their abundance often varied over time. Among the ectoparasites with direct life cycle, only P. heterocotyle decreased in abundance in the three sample sites. This can not be attributed to changes in host density, an expected driver of parasitism (Kamiya et al. 2014), because no evidence of drastic changes in the density of E. anchoita has been recorded during the last decades (Orlando et al. 2024a, 2024b). Thus, environmental factors arose as the most probable cause of decreasing abundance for this parasite. In the case of heteroxenous parasites, by having complex life cycles that require multiple hosts, environmental changes can have an even stronger impact, because there is a greater chance that one or more of required host species will be affected, interrupting the parasite life cycle (Rohr et al. 2011; Lafferty 2012; Wood and Vanhove 2023). Furthermore, beyond influencing host density, changes in temperature and other abiotic parameters can affect life-history characteristics of both hosts and parasites, repercussing on parasite transmission and, potentially, virulence (Marcogliese 2001). Despite the absence of recurrent patterns across all stocks, most changes reflected decreases in abundance, suggesting less favorable conditions in recent years for the majority of parasites. The exception was Anisakis sp., who consistently increased in abundance in all stocks. Larval Anisakis in anchovies seem to follow the general trend of the genus recorded at global scale. Indeed, larval Anisakis have shown notable increases in abundance in both intermediate (Fiorenza et al. 2020) and definitive (Mastick et al. 2024) hosts during last decades around the world, which was attributed mostly to protection measures on marine mammals that allowed the recovery of many cetacean populations.

Because of the changes underwent by the parasite species combined, the structure of their assemblages was also affected. Indeed, the decrease in parasitism by several species in all stocks led to a lower species richness in the infracommunities, which, however, was reflected in a decrease in the diversity only for SB, but not in the other two stocks due to an increase in their respective evenness. As in the case of parasite abundance, changes in host density are not attributable as causatives of the observed patterns. Additionally, and except for the monogenean, all other parasite species are widely distributed among fish in the region (Navone et al. 1998; Timi et al. 1999a, b, 2001), which suggests that the observed decreases in parasitism are unlikely to be attributed to changes in host density in a single species.

In addition to changes in host density, variations in the ecophysiology of host-parasite interactions and shifts in behavior, movement and phenology of both parasites and hosts have been identified among the causes of alterations in parasitism induced by environmental change (Altizer et al. 2007). Indeed, ENSO (El Niño Southern Oscillation) events, which are becoming more intense and frequent, produce changes in wind and sea surface temperature anomalies, contributingto altering the pelagic ecosystem structure and communities in theSouthwestern Atlantic Ocean (Morley et al. 2025). These distributional shifts may alter the match-mismatch dynamics between pelagic fish and their parasites, leading to declines in parasitism with climate change, a trend that has already been observed in this host-parasite system (Marcotegui et al. 2025). Although there is no information about the sensitivity of Argentine anchovy parasites to environmental variations, anchovies have been identified as having low sensitivity to climate change, displaying a high potential to adjust its distribution (Gianelli et al. 2023) in response to changes in the regional warming hotspots (Alvarez Perez and Sant’Ana 2022). This ability may facilitate phenological mismatches involving parasites present in other host species, probably accounting for the decreasing burdens for most parasites.

We acknowledge that, with data obtained only from both ends of a given period, it cannot be reliably established whether the causes of the observed changes are due to large-scale processes, such as climate change, or to variations occurring at more limited spatiotemporal scales, for instance, seasonal, interannual, or even random fluctuations. The interannual similarity observed for the first three years of study in the northern regions, however, demonstrates that the results obtained are unlikely due to short-term variations. On the other hand, variations occurring simultaneously in all three stocks support that processes acting on parasite assemblages occur at broad spatial scales, to produce higher differences between periods of samples from the same stocks than those from the same period between stocks, according to the centroid distances, nMDS and CAP analyses. Although these temporal differences were less pronounced in P, all pairwise comparisons of multivariate abundance were significantly different from each other. Component communities also revealed that sampling period, rather than stock, was the primary factor influencing similarity among samples.

In brief, major changes were detected in both parasite populations and assemblages, most occurring at broad geographical scales and in congruent patterns across anchovy stocks in the last decades. Sea temperatures have increased in the Southwestern Atlantic Ocean over this period (Risaro et al. 2022; Gianelli et al. 2023; Parietti et al. 2025). It is known that such extended temperature anomalies can produce changes in the distribution of pelagic fishes (Zhai et al. 2024), leading to a decoupling of phenological relationships and producing trophic mismatches that also alter food-web structures (Edwards and Richardson 2004), reshaping marine communities and trophic interactions across decades (Alheit and Niquen 2004). Therefore, due to their vulnerability to climate variability, small pelagics have been proposed as valuable indicators for detecting regime shifts in fish stocks (Vasconcelos et al. 2024). Nevertheless, their boom-and-bust population dynamics, tightly tied to climate variability, complicate the detection and measurements of climate change (Ariza et al. 2022; Swalethorp et al. 2022). Consequently, their parasites, highly reliant on environmental factors, host ecology, and food webs structure for transmission, constitute reliable indicators and even earlier sentinels of such changes.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary Material 1 (6.2MB, docx)

Acknowledgements

We thank the scientific staff for the collection of samples on board INIDEP research vessels as well as the donation of samples obtained on commercial vessels. Financial support was provided by grants from Fondo para la Investigación Científica y Tecnológica (PICT-2021-I-A-01105) and Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata (EXA1104/22).

Author contributions

All authors contributed to the study conception and design. Material preparation, data collection and analysis were performed by PM, MM, MP and JT. The first draft of the manuscript was written by PM and all authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Data availability

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Declarations

Ethical approval

All procedures involving animals were conducted in accordance with relevant national and international guidelines for the care and use of animals in scientific research. All fish specimens used in this study were obtained through the National Institute of Fisheries Research, under the Secretariat of Agriculture, Livestock and Fisheries of the Ministry of Economy. Importantly, no fish were sacrificed specifically for the purposes of this study.

Consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent to publish

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Clinical trial number

not applicable.

Footnotes

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

References

  1. Alheit J, Niquen M (2004) Regime shifts in the Humboldt Current ecosystem. Prog Oceanogr 60:201–222. 10.1016/j.pocean.2004.02.006 [Google Scholar]
  2. Altizer S, Nunn CL, Lindenfors P (2007) Do threatened hosts have fewer parasites? A comparative study in primates. J Anim Ecol 76:304–314. 10.1111/j.1365-2656.2007.01214.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Alvarez Perez JA, Sant’Ana R (2022) Tropicalization of demersal megafauna in the western South Atlantic since 2013. Commun Earth Environ 3(1):227 [Google Scholar]
  4. Anderson MJ, Robinson J (2003) Generalized discriminant analysis based on distances. Aust N Z J Stat 45:301–318. 10.1111/1467-842X.00285 [Google Scholar]
  5. Anderson MJ, Willis TJ (2003) Canonical analysis of principal coordinates: a useful method of constrained ordination for ecology. Ecology 84:511–525. 10.1890/0012-9658(2003)084[0511:CAOPCA]2.0.CO;2 [Google Scholar]
  6. Anderson MJ, Gorley RN, Clarke KR (2008) PERMANOVA + For PRIMER: Guide to Software and Statistical Methods. PRIMER-E, Plymouth [Google Scholar]
  7. Angelescu V (1982) Ecologia trofica de la anchoita del Mar Argentino (Engraulidae, Engraulis anchoita) parte ii. Alimentacion, comportamiento y relaciones tróficas en el ecosistema. Contrib Inst Nac Invest Desarr Pesq, Mar del Plata [Google Scholar]
  8. Angelescu V, Cousseau MB (1967) Distribución espacial y cronológica de la anchoíta 533 en el Mar Epicontinental Argentino. CARPAS - FAO/Doc Téc 9:1–48 [Google Scholar]
  9. Ariza A, Lengaigne M, Menkes C, Lebourges-Dhaussy A, Receveur A, Gorgues T, Habasque J, Gutiérrez J, Maury O, Bertrand A (2022) Global decline of pelagic fauna in a warmer ocean. Nat Clim Chang 12(10):928–934. 10.1038/s41558-022-01479-2 [Google Scholar]
  10. Auad G, Martos P (2012) Climate variability of the northern Argentinean Shelf circulation: impact on Engraulis anchoita. Int J Ocean Clim Syst 3:17–43. 10.1260/1759-3131.3.1.17 [Google Scholar]
  11. Benedetti F, Vogt M, Elizondo UH, Righetti D, Zimmermann NE, Gruber N (2021) Major restructuring of marine plankton assemblages under global warming. Nat Commun 12(1):5226. 10.1038/s41467-021-25385-x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Berland B (1984) Basic techniques involved in helminth preservation. Syst Parasitol 6:242–245 [Google Scholar]
  13. Brown DR, Leonarduzzi E, Buratti CC (2014) Edad y crecimiento diario de juveniles de Engraulis anchoita provenientes del Golfo San Matías (41° S-64° W). Rev Invest Desarr Pesq 24:87–98 [Google Scholar]
  14. Bush AO, Lafferty KD, Lotz JM, Shostak AW (1997) Parasitology meets ecology on its own terms: Margolis et al. revisited. J Parasitol 83:575–583. 10.2307/3284227 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Carlson CJ, Burgio KR, Dougherty ER, Phillips AJ, Bueno VM, Clements CF, Castaldo G, Dallas TA, Cizauskas CA, Cumming GS, Doña J, Harris NC, Jovani R, Mironov S, Muellerklein OC, Proctor HC, Getz WM (2017) Parasite biodiversity faces extinction and redistribution in a changing climate. Sci Adv 3:e1602422. 10.1126/sciadv.1602422 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Ciancio JE, Yorio P, Wilson R, Frere E (2018) Food provisioning in Magellanic penguins as inferred from stable isotope ratios. Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom 32(6):489–494. 10.1002/rcm.8065 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Ciancio J, Yorio P, Buratti C, Alvarez Colombo G, Frere E (2021) Isotopic niche plasticity in a marine top predator as indicator of a large marine ecosystem food web status. Ecol Indic 126:107687. 10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.107687 [Google Scholar]
  18. Cizauskas CA, Carlson CJ, Burgio KR, Clements CF, Dougherty ER, Harris NC, Phillips AJ (2017) Parasite vulnerability to climate change: an evidence-based functional trait approach. R Soc Open Sci 4:160535. 10.1098/rsos.160535 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Clarke KR, Gorley RN (2015) PRIMER v7: User manual/tutorial. Plymouth: PRIMER-E, Ltd.
  20. Cury P, Bakun A, Crawford RJM, Jarre A, Quiñones RA, Shannon LJ, Verheye HM (2000) Small pelagics in upwelling systems: patterns of interaction and structural changes in wasp-waist ecosystems. ICES J Mari Sci 57:603–618. 10.1006/jmsc.2000.0712
  21. Defeo O, Vasconcellos M (2020) Transición hacia un enfoque ecosistémico de la pesca - Lecciones aprendidas de pesquerías de América del Sur. FAO Documento técnico de pesca y acuicultura Nro 668. Roma, FAO. 10.4060/cb2229es
  22. del Favero JM, Katsuragawa M, Zani-Teixeira ML, Turner JT (2017) Spawning areas of Engraulis anchoita in the Southeastern Brazilian Bight during late-spring and early summer. Prog Oceanogr 153:37–49. 10.1016/j.pocean.2017.03.004 [Google Scholar]
  23. Dunn OJ (1964) Multiple comparisons using ranks sums. Technometrics 6:241–252 [Google Scholar]
  24. Edwards M, Richardson AJ (2004) Impact of climate change on marine pelagic phenology and trophic mismatch. Nature 430(7002):881–884. 10.1038/nature02808 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Fiorenza EA, Wendt CA, Dobkowski KA, Ling TL, Pappaionou M, Rabinowitz P, Samhouri JF, Wood CL (2020) It’s a wormy world: Meta-analysis reveals several decades of change in the global abundance of the parasitic nematodes Anisakis spp. and Pseudoterranova spp. in marine fishes and invertebrates. Glob Change Biol 26(5):2854–2866. 10.1111/gcb.15048 [DOI] [PubMed]
  26. Franco BC, Combes V, González Carman V (2020a) Subsurface ocean warming hotspots and potential impacts on marine species: the southwest south atlantic ocean case study. Front Mar Sci 7:563394. 10.3389/fmars.2020.563394
  27. Franco BC, Defeo O, Piola AR, Barreiro M, Yang H, Ortega L, Gianelli I, Castello JP, Vera C, Buratti C, Pájaro M, Pezzi LP, Möller OO (2020b) Climate change impacts on the atmospheric circulation, ocean, and fisheries in the southwest South Atlantic Ocean: a review. Clim Change 162:2359–2377. 10.1007/s10584-020-02783-6 [Google Scholar]
  28. Gianelli I, Ortega L, Marín Y, Piola AR, Defeo O (2019) Evidence of ocean warming in Uruguay’s fisheries landings: the mean temperature of the catch approach. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 625:115–125. 10.3354/meps13035 [Google Scholar]
  29. Gianelli I, Orlando L, Cardoso LG, Carranza A, Celentano E, Correa P, de la Rosa A, Doño F, Haimovici M, Horta S, Jaureguizar AJ, Jorge-Romero G, Lercari D, Martínez G, Pereyra I, Silveira S, Vögler R, Defeo O (2023) Sensitivity of fishery resources to climate change in the warm-temperate Southwest Atlantic Ocean. Reg Environ Change 23(2):49. 10.1007/s10113-023-02049-8 [Google Scholar]
  30. Hansen JE (1994) Diferencias entre parámetros vitales de las poblaciones bonaerense y patagónica de anchoíta. Rev Invest Des Pesq 9:11–24 [Google Scholar]
  31. Hansen J (2004) Anchoita (Engraulis anchotia). In: Sánchez R P, Bezzi SI (eds) El Mar Argentino y sus recursos pesqueros. Tomo 4. Los peces marinos de interés pesquero. Caracterización biológica y evaluación del estado de explotación. Instituto Nacional de Investigación y Desarrollo Pesquero (INIDEP), Mar del Plata, pp 101–115
  32. Hansen JE, Cousseau MB, Gru DL (1984) Características poblacionales de la anchoíta (Engraulis anchoita) del Mar Argentino. Parte I. El largo medio al primer año de vida, crecimiento y mortalidad. Rev Invest Des Pesq 4:21–28 [Google Scholar]
  33. Harvell CD, Mitchell CE, Ward JR, Altizer S, Dobson AP, Ostfeld RS, Samuel MD (2002a) Warming and disease risks for terrestrial and marine biota. Science 296:2158–2162. 10.1126/10.1126/science.1063699 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Harvell CD, Mitchell CE, Ward JR, Altizer S, Dobson AP, Ostfeld RS, Samuel MD (2002b) Warming and disease risks for terrestrial and marine biota. Science 296(5576):2158–2162 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Hobday AJ, Pecl GT (2014) Identification of global marine hotspots: sentinels for change and vanguards for adaptation action. Rev Fish Biol Fish 24:415–425. 10.1007/s11160-013-9326-6 [Google Scholar]
  36. Kamiya T, O’Dwyer K, Nakagawa S, Poulin R (2014) What determines species richness of parasitic organisms? A meta-analysis across animal, plant and fungal hosts. Biol Rev 89(1):123–134. 10.1111/brv.12046 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Kwiatkowski L, Torres O, Bopp L, Aumont O, Chamberlain M, Christian JR, Dunne JP, Gehlen M, Ilyina T, John JG, Lenton A, Li H, Lovenduski NS, Orr JC, Palmieri J, Santana-Falcón Y, Schwinger J, Séférian R, Stock CA, Tagliabue A, Takano Y, Tjiputra J, Toyama K, Tsujino H, Watanabe M, Yamamoto A, Yool A, Ziehn T (2020) Twenty-first century ocean warming, acidification, deoxygenation, and upper-ocean nutrient and primary production decline from CMIP6 model projections. Biogeosciences 17:3439–3470. 10.1038/s41558-022-01479-2 [Google Scholar]
  38. Lafferty KD (2012) Biodiversity loss decreases parasite diversity: theory and patterns. Philos Trans R Soc Lond Biol Sci 367(1604):2814–2827. 10.1098/rstb.2012.0110 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Lanfranchi AL, Canel D, Alarcos AJ, Levy E, Braicovich PE, Marcotegui P, Timi JT (2024) Parasite assemblages as indicators of stability in stock structure of Cynoscion guatucupa (Sciaenidae) after a quarter of century of exploitation in a marine warming hotspot. Rev Fish Biol Fish 34(3):1149–1166 [Google Scholar]
  40. Lefort S, Aumont O, Bopp L, Arsouze T, Gehlen M, Maury O (2015) Spatial and body-size dependent response of marine pelagic communities to projected global climate change. Glob Chang Biol 21:154–164. 10.1111/gcb.12679 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Luz Clara M, Maenza RA, Prario BE (2025) Analysis of marine heatwaves in the region of the common fishing zone (ZCP) shared by Argentina and Uruguay based on observations from the satellite era (1982–2021). Frente Marit 27:22–25 [Google Scholar]
  42. Machovsky-Capuska GE, von Haeften G, Romero MA, Rodríguez DH, Gerpe MS (2020) Linking cadmium and mercury accumulation to nutritional intake in common dolphins (Delphinus delphis) from Patagonia, Argentina. Environ Pollut 263:114480. 10.1016/j.envpol.2020.114480 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Magurran AE (1988) Ecological Diversity and its Measurement. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ [Google Scholar]
  44. Marcogliese DJ (2001) Implications of climate change for parasitism of animals in the aquatic environment. Can J Zool 79:1331–1352. 10.1139/z01-067 [Google Scholar]
  45. Marcogliese DJ (2023) Major drivers of biodiversity loss and their impacts on helminth parasite populations and communities. J Helminthol 97:e34. 10.1017/S0022149X2300010X [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Marcogliese DJ (2025) Climate Change and Parasitism in Aquatic Ecosystems. In: Smit NJ, Sures B (eds) Aquatic Parasitology: Ecological and Environmental Concepts and Implications of Marine and Freshwater Parasites. Springer Nature. 10.1007/978-3-031-83903-0_22
  47. Marcotegui P, Merlo MJ, Gutiérrez MP, Buratti CC, Parietti M, Timi JT (2024) An independent stock of Engraulis anchoita in north Patagonian waters? Parasite tags as evidence. Fish Res 279:107148. 10.1016/j.fishres.2024.107148 [Google Scholar]
  48. Marcotegui P, Merlo MJ, Irigoitia MM, Gutiérrez MP, Buratti CC, Seco Pon JP, Parietti M, Timi JT (2025) Local extinction of a parasite of magellanic penguins? The effect of a warming hotspot on a cold trematode. Parasitology 152(3):275–283. 10.1017/S0031182025000216 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Mastick NC, Fiorenza E, Wood CL (2024) Meta-analysis suggests that, for marine mammals, the risk of parasitism by anisakids changed between 1978 and 2015. Ecosphere 15:e4781. 10.1002/ecs2.4781 [Google Scholar]
  50. Morley SA, Campanella F, Young EF, Baylis AMM, Barnes DKA, Bell JB, Bennison A, Collins MA, Glass T, Martin SM, Whomersley P, Schofield A (2025) Dramatic ENSO related Southwestern Atlantic ecosystem shifts. Sci Rep 15:7917. 10.1038/s41598-025-93080-8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Muhling B, Lindegren M, Clausen LW, Hobday A, Lehodey P (2017) Impacts of climate change on pelagic fish and fisheries. Clim Chang Impacts Fish Aquac Glob Anal 2:771–814. 10.1002/97811 [Google Scholar]
  52. Navone GT, Sardella NH, Timi JT (1998) Larvae and adults of Hysterothylacium aduncum (Rudolphi, 1802) (Nematoda: Anisakidae) in fishes and crustaceans in the South West Atlantic. Parasite 5:127–136 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Orlando P, Buratti CC, Garciarena AD, Buratti GE, Parietti M, Spath MC (2024a) Dinámica poblacional de la anchoíta bonaerense entre 1990 y 2023. Recomendaciones de capturas máximas en el año 2024. Inf Tec Oficial INIDEP Nº022/24, 25 pp
  54. Orlando P, Buratti CC, Garciarena AD, Buratti GE, Parietti M, Spath MC (2024b) Estado de la población de anchoíta (Engraulis anchoita) al sur de 41° S y determinación de la captura biológicamente aceptable del año 2024. Inf Tec Oficial INIDEP Nº 23/24:20 [Google Scholar]
  55. Parietti M, Giorgini M, Menna BV, Orlando P, Buratti CC (2025) Seasonal patterns in the distribution of Engraulis anchoita in the North Patagonian Continental Shelf of SW Atlantic Ocean. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 756:111–126. 10.3354/meps14810 [Google Scholar]
  56. Preisser WC, Welicky RL, Leslie KL, Mastick NC, Fiorenza EA, Maslenikov KP, Tornabene L, Kinsella JM, Wood CL (2022) Parasite communities in English Sole (Parophrys vetulus) have changed in composition but not richness in the Salish Sea, Washington, USA since 1930. Parasitol 149:786–798. 10.1017/S0031182022000233 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. Pritchard MH, Kruse GO (1982) The Collection and Preservation of Animal Parasites. University of Nebraska
  58. Risaro DB, Chidichimo MP, Piola AR (2022) Interannual variability and trends of sea surface temperature around southern South America. Front Mar Sci 213. 10.3389/fmars.2022.829144
  59. Rohr JR, Dobson AP, Johnson PTJ, Kilpatrick AM, Paull SH, Raffel TR, Ruiz-Moreno D, Thomas MB (2011) Frontiers in climate change–disease research. Trends Ecol Evol 26:270–277. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. tree.2011.03.002 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  60. Sarre A, Demarcq H, Keenlyside N, Krakstad JO, El Ayoubi S, Jeyid AM, Faye S, Mbaye A, Sidibeh M, Brehmer P (2024) Climate change impacts on small pelagic fish distribution in Northwest Africa: trends, shifts, and risk for food security. Sci Rep 14(1):12684. 10.1038/s41598-024-61734-8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  61. Sures B, Nachev M, Schwelm J, Grabner D, Selbach C (2023) Environmental parasitology: stressor effects on aquatic parasites. Trends Parasitol 39(6):461–474. 10.1016/j.pt.2023.03.005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  62. Swalethorp R, Landry MR, Semmens BX, Ohman MD, Aluwihare L, Chargualaf D, Thompson AR (2022) Anchovy boom and bust linked to trophic shifts in larval diet. Nat Commun 14:7412. 10.1038/s41467-023-42966-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  63. Timi JT (2003) Parasites of Argentine anchovy in the south‐west Atlantic: latitudinal patterns and their use for discrimination of host populations. J Fish Biol 63(1):90-744 107. 10.1046/j.1095-8649.2003.00131.x [Google Scholar]
  64. Timi JT, Sardella NH (1998) Myxosporeans and coccidians parasitic on engraulid fishes from the coasts of Argentina and Uruguay. Parasite 5:331–339. 10.1051/parasite/199805431 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  65. Timi JT, Martorelli SR, Sardella NH (1999a) Digenetic trematodes parasitic on Engraulis anchoita (Pisces: Engraulidae) from Argentina and Uruguay. Folia Parasitol 46:132–138 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  66. Timi JT, Sardella NH, Etchegoin JA (1999b) Mazocraeid monogeneans parasitic on engraulid fishes in the Southwest Atlantic. J Parasitol 85(1):28–32 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  67. Timi JT, Sardella NH, Navone GT (2001) Parasitic nematodes of Engraulis anchoita Hubbs et Marini, 1935 (Pisces: Engraulidae) off the Argentine and Uruguayan coasts, South West Atlantic. Acta Parasitol 46(3):186–193
  68. Vasconcelos J, Sanabria-Fernandez JA, Tuset VM et al (2024) Rising temperatures, falling fisheries: causes and consequences of crossing the tipping point in a small-pelagic community. Rev Fish Biol Fisheries 34:1511–1530. 10.1007/s11160-024-09885-9 [Google Scholar]
  69. Welicky RL, Preisser WC, Leslie KL, Mastick N, Fiorenza E, Maslenikov KP, Tornabene L, Kinsella JM, Wood CL (2021) Parasites of the past: 90 years of change in parasitism for English sole. Front Ecol Environ 19(8):470–477. 10.1002/fee.2379 [Google Scholar]
  70. Wood CL (2025) Parasites in a changing world: troublesome or in trouble? Annu Rev Anim Biosci 13:303–323. 10.1146/annurev-animal-111523-102039 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  71. Wood CL, Vanhove MPM (2023) Is the world wormier than it used to be? We’ll never know without natural history collections. J Anim Ecol 92(2):250–262. 10.1111/1365-2656.13794 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  72. Yorio P, González-Zevallos D, Gatto A, Biagioni O, Castillo J (2017) Relevance of forage fish in the diet of Magellanic penguins breeding in northern Patagonia, Argentina. Mar Biol Res 13:603–617. 10.1080/17451000.2016.1273529 [Google Scholar]
  73. Zar JH (1999) Biostatistical analysis, 4th edn. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ. 10.1080/02724939992581 [Google Scholar]
  74. Zhai Y, Zhu Y, Peng D, Chu J (2024) Impacts of climate change on the geographic distribution patterns of pelagic fishes in the Southern Ocean. Glob Planet Change 229:104504. 10.1016/j.gloplacha.2024.104504 [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary Material 1 (6.2MB, docx)

Data Availability Statement

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.


Articles from Parasitology Research are provided here courtesy of Springer

RESOURCES