Skip to main content
PMC home page
Biophysical Journal logoLink to Biophysical Journal
. 2000 Jul;79(1):468–478. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(00)76308-9

Measurement of the force produced by an intact bull sperm flagellum in isometric arrest and estimation of the dynein stall force.

K A Schmitz 1, D L Holcomb-Wygle 1, D J Oberski 1, C B Lindemann 1
PMCID: PMC1300950  PMID: 10866972

Abstract

The force generated by a detergent-extracted reactivated bull sperm flagellum during an isometric stall was measured with a force-calibrated glass microprobe. The average isometric stall force from 48 individual measurements was 2.5 +/- 0.7 x 10(-5) dyne (2.5 +/- 0.7 x 10(-10) N). The force measurements were obtained by positioning a calibrated microprobe in the beat path of sperm cells that were stuck by their heads to a glass microscope slide. The average position of the contact point of the flagellum with the probe was 15 microm from the head-tail junction. This average lever arm length multiplied by the measured force yields an estimate of the active bending moment (torque) of 3.9 x 10(-8) dyne x cm (3.9 x 10(-15) N x m). The force was sustained and was for the most part uniform, despite the fact that the flagellum beyond the point of contact with the probe usually continued beating. It appears that the dynein motors in the basal portion of the flagellum continue to pull in an isometric stall for as long as the motion of the flagellum is blocked. If dynein motors in the flagellum distal to the contact point with the probe were contributing force to the displacement of the probe, then the flagellar segment immediately past the point of contact would have to show a net curvature in the direction of the probe displacement. No such curvature bias was observed in the R-bend arrests, and only a small positive curvature bias was measured in the P-bend arrests. Our analysis of the data suggests that more than 90% of the sustained force component is generated by the part of the flagellum between the probe and the flagellar base. Based on this premise, the isometric stall force per dynein head is estimated to be 5.0 x 10(-7) dyne (5 pN). This equals approximately 1.0 x 10(-6) dyne (10 pN) per intact dynein arm. These values are close to the isometric stall force of isolated dynein. This suggests that all of the dynein heads between the base and the probe, on the active side of the axoneme, are contributing to the force exerted against the probe.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (201.3 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Ashkin A., Schütze K., Dziedzic J. M., Euteneuer U., Schliwa M. Force generation of organelle transport measured in vivo by an infrared laser trap. Nature. 1990 Nov 22;348(6299):346–348. doi: 10.1038/348346a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Brokaw C. J. Computer simulation of flagellar movement. I. Demonstration of stable bend propagation and bend initiation by the sliding filament model. Biophys J. 1972 May;12(5):564–586. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(72)86104-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Brokaw C. J. Computer simulation of flagellar movement: VII. Conventional but functionally different cross-bridge models for inner and outer arm dyneins can explain the effects of outer arm dynein removal. Cell Motil Cytoskeleton. 1999;42(2):134–148. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0169(1999)42:2<134::AID-CM5>3.0.CO;2-B. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Fawcett D. W., Phillips D. M. The fine structure and development of the neck region of the mammalian spermatozoon. Anat Rec. 1969 Oct;165(2):153–164. doi: 10.1002/ar.1091650204. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Hamasaki T., Holwill M. E., Barkalow K., Satir P. Mechanochemical aspects of axonemal dynein activity studied by in vitro microtubule translocation. Biophys J. 1995 Dec;69(6):2569–2579. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(95)80128-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Holcomb-Wygle D. L., Schmitz K. A., Lindemann C. B. Flagellar arrest behavior predicted by the Geometric Clutch model is confirmed experimentally by micromanipulation experiments on reactivated bull sperm. Cell Motil Cytoskeleton. 1999 Nov;44(3):177–189. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0169(199911)44:3<177::AID-CM3>3.0.CO;2-W. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Johnson K. A., Marchese-Ragona S. P., Clutter D. B., Holzbaur E. L., Chilcote T. J. Dynein structure and function. J Cell Sci Suppl. 1986;5:189–196. doi: 10.1242/jcs.1986.supplement_5.12. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Johnson K. A. Pathway of the microtubule-dynein ATPase and the structure of dynein: a comparison with actomyosin. Annu Rev Biophys Biophys Chem. 1985;14:161–188. doi: 10.1146/annurev.bb.14.060185.001113. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Kamimura S., Takahashi K. Direct measurement of the force of microtubule sliding in flagella. Nature. 1981 Oct 15;293(5833):566–568. doi: 10.1038/293566a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Lindemann C. B. Functional significance of the outer dense fibers of mammalian sperm examined by computer simulations with the geometric clutch model. Cell Motil Cytoskeleton. 1996;34(4):258–270. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0169(1996)34:4<258::AID-CM1>3.0.CO;2-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Lindemann C. B., Gibbons I. R. Adenosine triphosphate-induced motility and sliding of filaments in mammalian sperm extracted with Triton X-100. J Cell Biol. 1975 Apr;65(1):147–162. doi: 10.1083/jcb.65.1.147. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Lindemann C. B., Kanous K. S. A model for flagellar motility. Int Rev Cytol. 1997;173:1–72. doi: 10.1016/s0074-7696(08)62475-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Lindemann C. B., Rudd W. G., Rikmenspoel R. The stiffness of the flagella of impaled bull sperm. Biophys J. 1973 May;13(5):437–448. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(73)85997-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Murase M. Excitable dynein model with multiple active sites for large-amplitude oscillations and bend propagation in flagella. J Theor Biol. 1991 Mar 21;149(2):181–202. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5193(05)80276-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Murase M. Simulation of ciliary beating by an excitable dynein model: oscillations, quiescence and mechano-sensitivity. J Theor Biol. 1990 Sep 21;146(2):209–231. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5193(05)80136-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Oiwa K., Takahashi K. The force-velocity relationship for microtubule sliding in demembranated sperm flagella of the sea urchin. Cell Struct Funct. 1988 Jun;13(3):193–205. doi: 10.1247/csf.13.193. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Olson G. E., Linck R. W. Observations of the structural components of flagellar axonemes and central pair microtubules from rat sperm. J Ultrastruct Res. 1977 Oct;61(1):21–43. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5320(77)90004-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Sakakibara H., Kojima H., Sakai Y., Katayama E., Oiwa K. Inner-arm dynein c of Chlamydomonas flagella is a single-headed processive motor. Nature. 1999 Aug 5;400(6744):586–590. doi: 10.1038/23066. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Shingyoji C., Higuchi H., Yoshimura M., Katayama E., Yanagida T. Dynein arms are oscillating force generators. Nature. 1998 Jun 18;393(6686):711–714. doi: 10.1038/31520. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. VanBuren P., Work S. S., Warshaw D. M. Enhanced force generation by smooth muscle myosin in vitro. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1994 Jan 4;91(1):202–205. doi: 10.1073/pnas.91.1.202. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Wang Z., Khan S., Sheetz M. P. Single cytoplasmic dynein molecule movements: characterization and comparison with kinesin. Biophys J. 1995 Nov;69(5):2011–2023. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(95)80071-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Biophysical Journal are provided here courtesy of The Biophysical Society

RESOURCES