Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Biophysical Journal logoLink to Biophysical Journal
. 2000 Jul;79(1):584–594. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(00)76318-1

Salt-dependent compaction of di- and trinucleosomes studied by small-angle neutron scattering.

M Hammermann 1, K Tóth 1, C Rodemer 1, W Waldeck 1, R P May 1, J Langowski 1
PMCID: PMC1300960  PMID: 10866982

Abstract

Using small-angle neutron scattering (SANS), we have measured the salt-dependent static structure factor of di- and trinucleosomes from chicken erythrocytes and from COS-7 cells. We also determined the sedimentation coefficients of these dinucleosomes and dinucleosomes reconstituted on a 416-bp DNA containing two nucleosome positioning sequences of the 5S rDNA of Lytechinus variegatus at low and high salt concentrations. The internucleosomal distance d was calculated by simulation as well as Fourier back-transformation of the SANS curves and by hydrodynamic simulation of sedimentation coefficients. Nucleosome dimers from chicken erythrocyte chromatin show a decrease in d from approximately 220 A at 5 mM NaCl to 150 A at 100 mM NaCl. For dinucleosomes from COS-7 chromatin, d decreases from 180 A at 5 mM to 140 A at 100 mM NaCl concentration. Our measurements on trinucleosomes are compatible with a compaction through two different mechanisms, depending on the salt concentration. Between 0 and 20 mM NaCl, the internucleosomal distance between adjacent nucleosomes remains constant, whereas the angle of the DNA strands entering and leaving the central nucleosome decreases. Above 20 mM NaCl, the adjacent nucleosomes approach each other, similar to the compaction of dinucleosomes. The internucleosomal distance of 140-150 A at 100 mM NaCl is in agreement with distances measured by scanning force microscopy and electron microscopy on long chromatin filaments.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (263.7 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Bednar J., Horowitz R. A., Dubochet J., Woodcock C. L. Chromatin conformation and salt-induced compaction: three-dimensional structural information from cryoelectron microscopy. J Cell Biol. 1995 Dec;131(6 Pt 1):1365–1376. doi: 10.1083/jcb.131.6.1365. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bednar J., Horowitz R. A., Grigoryev S. A., Carruthers L. M., Hansen J. C., Koster A. J., Woodcock C. L. Nucleosomes, linker DNA, and linker histone form a unique structural motif that directs the higher-order folding and compaction of chromatin. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1998 Nov 24;95(24):14173–14178. doi: 10.1073/pnas.95.24.14173. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Butler P. J., Thomas J. O. Changes in chromatin folding in solution. J Mol Biol. 1980 Jul 15;140(4):505–529. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(80)90268-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Butler P. J., Thomas J. O. Dinucleosomes show compaction by ionic strength, consistent with bending of linker DNA. J Mol Biol. 1998 Aug 21;281(3):401–407. doi: 10.1006/jmbi.1998.1954. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Chahal S. S., Matthews H. R., Bradbury E. M. Acetylation of histone H4 and its role in chromatin structure and function. Nature. 1980 Sep 4;287(5777):76–79. doi: 10.1038/287076a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Dickerson R. E., Drew H. R., Conner B. N., Kopka M. L., Pjura P. E. Helix geometry and hydration in A-DNA, B-DNA, and Z-DNA. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol. 1983;47(Pt 1):13–24. doi: 10.1101/sqb.1983.047.01.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Dong F., van Holde K. E. Nucleosome positioning is determined by the (H3-H4)2 tetramer. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1991 Dec 1;88(23):10596–10600. doi: 10.1073/pnas.88.23.10596. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Finch J. T., Klug A. Solenoidal model for superstructure in chromatin. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1976 Jun;73(6):1897–1901. doi: 10.1073/pnas.73.6.1897. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Fletcher T. M., Hansen J. C. The nucleosomal array: structure/function relationships. Crit Rev Eukaryot Gene Expr. 1996;6(2-3):149–188. doi: 10.1615/critreveukargeneexpr.v6.i2-3.40. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Garcia de la Torre J., Navarro S., Lopez Martinez M. C., Diaz F. G., Lopez Cascales J. J. HYDRO: a computer program for the prediction of hydrodynamic properties of macromolecules. Biophys J. 1994 Aug;67(2):530–531. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(94)80512-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Gerchman S. E., Ramakrishnan V. Chromatin higher-order structure studied by neutron scattering and scanning transmission electron microscopy. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1987 Nov;84(22):7802–7806. doi: 10.1073/pnas.84.22.7802. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Godde J. S., Widom J. Chromatin structure of Schizosaccharomyces pombe. A nucleosome repeat length that is shorter than the chromatosomal DNA length. J Mol Biol. 1992 Aug 20;226(4):1009–1025. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(92)91049-u. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Graziano V., Gerchman S. E., Schneider D. K., Ramakrishnan V. Histone H1 is located in the interior of the chromatin 30-nm filament. Nature. 1994 Mar 24;368(6469):351–354. doi: 10.1038/368351a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Hagerman P. J. Flexibility of DNA. Annu Rev Biophys Biophys Chem. 1988;17:265–286. doi: 10.1146/annurev.bb.17.060188.001405. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Hamiche A., Schultz P., Ramakrishnan V., Oudet P., Prunell A. Linker histone-dependent DNA structure in linear mononucleosomes. J Mol Biol. 1996 Mar 22;257(1):30–42. doi: 10.1006/jmbi.1996.0144. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Hirai M., Niimura N., Zama M., Mita K., Ichimura S., Tokunaga F., Ishikawa Y. Interparticle interactions and structural changes of nucleosome core particles in low-salt solution. Biochemistry. 1988 Oct 4;27(20):7924–7931. doi: 10.1021/bi00420a051. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Leuba S. H., Bustamante C., Zlatanova J., van Holde K. Contributions of linker histones and histone H3 to chromatin structure: scanning force microscopy studies on trypsinized fibers. Biophys J. 1998 Jun;74(6):2823–2829. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(98)77989-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Leuba S. H., Bustamante C., van Holde K., Zlatanova J. Linker histone tails and N-tails of histone H3 are redundant: scanning force microscopy studies of reconstituted fibers. Biophys J. 1998 Jun;74(6):2830–2839. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(98)77990-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Luger K., Mäder A. W., Richmond R. K., Sargent D. F., Richmond T. J. Crystal structure of the nucleosome core particle at 2.8 A resolution. Nature. 1997 Sep 18;389(6648):251–260. doi: 10.1038/38444. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Luger K., Richmond T. J. The histone tails of the nucleosome. Curr Opin Genet Dev. 1998 Apr;8(2):140–146. doi: 10.1016/s0959-437x(98)80134-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Rydberg B., Holley W. R., Mian I. S., Chatterjee A. Chromatin conformation in living cells: support for a zig-zag model of the 30 nm chromatin fiber. J Mol Biol. 1998 Nov 20;284(1):71–84. doi: 10.1006/jmbi.1998.2150. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Simon R. H., Felsenfeld G. A new procedure for purifying histone pairs H2A + H2B and H3 + H4 from chromatin using hydroxylapatite. Nucleic Acids Res. 1979 Feb;6(2):689–696. doi: 10.1093/nar/6.2.689. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Simpson R. T., Thoma F., Brubaker J. M. Chromatin reconstituted from tandemly repeated cloned DNA fragments and core histones: a model system for study of higher order structure. Cell. 1985 Oct;42(3):799–808. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(85)90276-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Sperling L. The mass per unit length of chromatin by low-angle x-ray scattering. FEBS Lett. 1976 Apr 15;64(1):89–91. doi: 10.1016/0014-5793(76)80256-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Stafford W. F., 3rd Boundary analysis in sedimentation velocity experiments. Methods Enzymol. 1994;240:478–501. doi: 10.1016/s0076-6879(94)40061-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Stafford WF. Sedimentation velocity spins a new weave for an old fabric. Curr Opin Biotechnol. 1997 Feb 1;8(1):14–24. doi: 10.1016/s0958-1669(97)80152-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Usachenko S. I., Gavin I. M., Bavykin S. G. Alterations in nucleosome core structure in linker histone-depleted chromatin. J Biol Chem. 1996 Feb 16;271(7):3831–3836. doi: 10.1074/jbc.271.7.3831. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Varga-Weisz P. D., Bonte E. J., Becker P. B. Analysis of modulators of chromatin structure in Drosophila. Methods Enzymol. 1999;304:742–757. doi: 10.1016/s0076-6879(99)04045-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Widom J. Structure, dynamics, and function of chromatin in vitro. Annu Rev Biophys Biomol Struct. 1998;27:285–327. doi: 10.1146/annurev.biophys.27.1.285. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Woodcock C. L., Horowitz R. A. Chromatin organization re-viewed. Trends Cell Biol. 1995 Jul;5(7):272–277. doi: 10.1016/s0962-8924(00)89038-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Yao J., Lowary P. T., Widom J. Direct detection of linker DNA bending in defined-length oligomers of chromatin. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1990 Oct;87(19):7603–7607. doi: 10.1073/pnas.87.19.7603. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Yao J., Lowary P. T., Widom J. Linker DNA bending induced by the core histones of chromatin. Biochemistry. 1991 Aug 27;30(34):8408–8414. doi: 10.1021/bi00098a019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Zlatanova J., Leuba S. H., van Holde K. Chromatin fiber structure: morphology, molecular determinants, structural transitions. Biophys J. 1998 May;74(5):2554–2566. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(98)77963-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. van Holde K., Zlatanova J. Chromatin higher order structure: chasing a mirage? J Biol Chem. 1995 Apr 14;270(15):8373–8376. doi: 10.1074/jbc.270.15.8373. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. van Holde K., Zlatanova J. What determines the folding of the chromatin fiber? Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1996 Oct 1;93(20):10548–10555. doi: 10.1073/pnas.93.20.10548. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Biophysical Journal are provided here courtesy of The Biophysical Society

RESOURCES