Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Biophysical Journal logoLink to Biophysical Journal
. 2000 Sep;79(3):1358–1368. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(00)76388-0

Sh and eag K(+) channel subunit interaction in frog oocytes depends on level and time of expression.

M L Chen 1, T Hoshi 1, C F Wu 1
PMCID: PMC1301030  PMID: 10968998

Abstract

Subcellular clustering of ion channels critically affects neuronal function. Coexpression of Eag and Sh channel subunits in Xenopus oocytes leads to accelerated decay of the Sh-like transient K(+) current (Chen, M.-L., T. Hoshi, and C.-F. Wu. 1996. Neuron. 17:535-542). We report that such interaction depends critically on functional expression level (controlled by RNA injection quantities and indicated by current amplitudes) and developmental time after RNA injection. The accelerated decay became apparent 3 days after coinjection and increased thereafter. This was observed in different ionic conditions and at different voltage steps. However, decay was not accelerated at low expression levels, either within 1-2 days after injection or with reduced amounts of RNA. With sequential RNA injection, preformation of either Eag or Sh channels prevented interactions with the other subunit. The carboxyl terminus of Eag was found to be involved in accelerating, and in retarding recovery from, N-type inactivation. The interaction was reduced upon patch excision in macropatch measurements, suggesting involvement of cytosolic factors. We have reproduced the absence of interaction between Eag and Sh reported previously within 2 days after RNA injection and with low levels of current expression (Tang, C.-Y., C. T. Schulteis, R. M. Jiménez, and D. M. Papazian. 1998. Biophys. J. 75:1263-1270). Our findings demonstrate that heterologous expression of channels in Xenopus oocytes is a dynamic process influenced by cell physiology and development. These factors must be considered in interpreting the functional properties of heterologously expressed channels.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (146.6 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Anderson M. J., Cohen M. W. Nerve-induced and spontaneous redistribution of acetylcholine receptors on cultured muscle cells. J Physiol. 1977 Jul;268(3):757–773. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1977.sp011880. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Barnard E. A., Skolnick P., Olsen R. W., Mohler H., Sieghart W., Biggio G., Braestrup C., Bateson A. N., Langer S. Z. International Union of Pharmacology. XV. Subtypes of gamma-aminobutyric acidA receptors: classification on the basis of subunit structure and receptor function. Pharmacol Rev. 1998 Jun;50(2):291–313. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Chen M. L., Hoshi T., Wu C. F. Heteromultimeric interactions among K+ channel subunits from Shaker and eag families in Xenopus oocytes. Neuron. 1996 Sep;17(3):535–542. doi: 10.1016/s0896-6273(00)80185-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Covarrubias M., Wei A. A., Salkoff L. Shaker, Shal, Shab, and Shaw express independent K+ current systems. Neuron. 1991 Nov;7(5):763–773. doi: 10.1016/0896-6273(91)90279-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Frank E., Fischbach G. D. Early events in neuromuscular junction formation in vitro: induction of acetylcholine receptor clusters in the postsynaptic membrane and morphology of newly formed synapses. J Cell Biol. 1979 Oct;83(1):143–158. doi: 10.1083/jcb.83.1.143. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Ganetzky B., Robertson G. A., Wilson G. F., Trudeau M. C., Titus S. A. The eag family of K+ channels in Drosophila and mammals. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1999 Apr 30;868:356–369. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1999.tb11297.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Guillemare E., Honoré E., Pradier L., Lesage F., Schweitz H., Attali B., Barhanin J., Lazdunski M. Effects of the level of mRNA expression on biophysical properties, sensitivity to neurotoxins, and regulation of the brain delayed-rectifier K+ channels Kv1.2. Biochemistry. 1992 Dec 15;31(49):12463–12468. doi: 10.1021/bi00164a024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Haugland F. N., Wu C. F. A voltage-clamp analysis of gene-dosage effects of the Shaker locus on larval muscle potassium currents in Drosophila. J Neurosci. 1990 Apr;10(4):1357–1371. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.10-04-01357.1990. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Honoré E., Attali B., Romey G., Lesage F., Barhanin J., Lazdunski M. Different types of K+ channel current are generated by different levels of a single mRNA. EMBO J. 1992 Jul;11(7):2465–2471. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1992.tb05311.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Hoshi T., Zagotta W. N., Aldrich R. W. Two types of inactivation in Shaker K+ channels: effects of alterations in the carboxy-terminal region. Neuron. 1991 Oct;7(4):547–556. doi: 10.1016/0896-6273(91)90367-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Isacoff E. Y., Jan Y. N., Jan L. Y. Evidence for the formation of heteromultimeric potassium channels in Xenopus oocytes. Nature. 1990 Jun 7;345(6275):530–534. doi: 10.1038/345530a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Iverson L. E., Tanouye M. A., Lester H. A., Davidson N., Rudy B. A-type potassium channels expressed from Shaker locus cDNA. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1988 Aug;85(15):5723–5727. doi: 10.1073/pnas.85.15.5723. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Jan L. Y., Jan Y. N. Cloned potassium channels from eukaryotes and prokaryotes. Annu Rev Neurosci. 1997;20:91–123. doi: 10.1146/annurev.neuro.20.1.91. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Kim E., Niethammer M., Rothschild A., Jan Y. N., Sheng M. Clustering of Shaker-type K+ channels by interaction with a family of membrane-associated guanylate kinases. Nature. 1995 Nov 2;378(6552):85–88. doi: 10.1038/378085a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Li M., Jan Y. N., Jan L. Y. Specification of subunit assembly by the hydrophilic amino-terminal domain of the Shaker potassium channel. Science. 1992 Aug 28;257(5074):1225–1230. doi: 10.1126/science.1519059. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Liu F., Wan Q., Pristupa Z. B., Yu X. M., Wang Y. T., Niznik H. B. Direct protein-protein coupling enables cross-talk between dopamine D5 and gamma-aminobutyric acid A receptors. Nature. 2000 Jan 20;403(6767):274–280. doi: 10.1038/35002014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Ludwig J., Owen D., Pongs O. Carboxy-terminal domain mediates assembly of the voltage-gated rat ether-à-go-go potassium channel. EMBO J. 1997 Nov 3;16(21):6337–6345. doi: 10.1093/emboj/16.21.6337. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. MacKinnon R. Determination of the subunit stoichiometry of a voltage-activated potassium channel. Nature. 1991 Mar 21;350(6315):232–235. doi: 10.1038/350232a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. McCormack K., Lin J. W., Iverson L. E., Rudy B. Shaker K+ channel subunits from heteromultimeric channels with novel functional properties. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1990 Sep 28;171(3):1361–1371. doi: 10.1016/0006-291x(90)90836-c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Monyer H., Sprengel R., Schoepfer R., Herb A., Higuchi M., Lomeli H., Burnashev N., Sakmann B., Seeburg P. H. Heteromeric NMDA receptors: molecular and functional distinction of subtypes. Science. 1992 May 22;256(5060):1217–1221. doi: 10.1126/science.256.5060.1217. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Moran O., Schreibmayer W., Weigl L., Dascal N., Lotan I. Level of expression controls modes of gating of a K+ channel. FEBS Lett. 1992 May 4;302(1):21–25. doi: 10.1016/0014-5793(92)80275-l. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Niethammer M., Kim E., Sheng M. Interaction between the C terminus of NMDA receptor subunits and multiple members of the PSD-95 family of membrane-associated guanylate kinases. J Neurosci. 1996 Apr 1;16(7):2157–2163. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.16-07-02157.1996. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Papazian D. M. Potassium channels: some assembly required. Neuron. 1999 May;23(1):7–10. doi: 10.1016/s0896-6273(00)80746-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Pardo L. A., del Camino D., Sánchez A., Alves F., Brüggemann A., Beckh S., Stühmer W. Oncogenic potential of EAG K(+) channels. EMBO J. 1999 Oct 15;18(20):5540–5547. doi: 10.1093/emboj/18.20.5540. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Pongs O., Kecskemethy N., Müller R., Krah-Jentgens I., Baumann A., Kiltz H. H., Canal I., Llamazares S., Ferrus A. Shaker encodes a family of putative potassium channel proteins in the nervous system of Drosophila. EMBO J. 1988 Apr;7(4):1087–1096. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1988.tb02917.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Rudy B. Diversity and ubiquity of K channels. Neuroscience. 1988 Jun;25(3):729–749. doi: 10.1016/0306-4522(88)90033-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Salkoff L., Wyman R. Genetic modification of potassium channels in Drosophila Shaker mutants. Nature. 1981 Sep 17;293(5829):228–230. doi: 10.1038/293228a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Sanguinetti M. C., Jiang C., Curran M. E., Keating M. T. A mechanistic link between an inherited and an acquired cardiac arrhythmia: HERG encodes the IKr potassium channel. Cell. 1995 Apr 21;81(2):299–307. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(95)90340-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Schwarz T. L., Tempel B. L., Papazian D. M., Jan Y. N., Jan L. Y. Multiple potassium-channel components are produced by alternative splicing at the Shaker locus in Drosophila. Nature. 1988 Jan 14;331(6152):137–142. doi: 10.1038/331137a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Sheng M., Cummings J., Roldan L. A., Jan Y. N., Jan L. Y. Changing subunit composition of heteromeric NMDA receptors during development of rat cortex. Nature. 1994 Mar 10;368(6467):144–147. doi: 10.1038/368144a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Silverman S. K., Kofuji P., Dougherty D. A., Davidson N., Lester H. A. A regenerative link in the ionic fluxes through the weaver potassium channel underlies the pathophysiology of the mutation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1996 Dec 24;93(26):15429–15434. doi: 10.1073/pnas.93.26.15429. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Singh A., Singh S. Unmasking of a novel potassium current in Drosophila by a mutation and drugs. J Neurosci. 1999 Aug 15;19(16):6838–6843. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.19-16-06838.1999. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Taleb O., Betz H. Expression of the human glycine receptor alpha 1 subunit in Xenopus oocytes: apparent affinities of agonists increase at high receptor density. EMBO J. 1994 Mar 15;13(6):1318–1324. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1994.tb06384.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Tang C. Y., Schulteis C. T., Jiménez R. M., Papazian D. M. Shaker and ether-à-go-go K+ channel subunits fail to coassemble in Xenopus oocytes. Biophys J. 1998 Sep;75(3):1263–1270. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(98)74046-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Tejedor F. J., Bokhari A., Rogero O., Gorczyca M., Zhang J., Kim E., Sheng M., Budnik V. Essential role for dlg in synaptic clustering of Shaker K+ channels in vivo. J Neurosci. 1997 Jan 1;17(1):152–159. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.17-01-00152.1997. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Terlau H., Ludwig J., Steffan R., Pongs O., Stühmer W., Heinemann S. H. Extracellular Mg2+ regulates activation of rat eag potassium channel. Pflugers Arch. 1996 Jun;432(2):301–312. doi: 10.1007/s004240050137. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Timpe L. C., Jan Y. N., Jan L. Y. Four cDNA clones from the Shaker locus of Drosophila induce kinetically distinct A-type potassium currents in Xenopus oocytes. Neuron. 1988 Oct;1(8):659–667. doi: 10.1016/0896-6273(88)90165-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Wang H., Kunkel D. D., Martin T. M., Schwartzkroin P. A., Tempel B. L. Heteromultimeric K+ channels in terminal and juxtaparanodal regions of neurons. Nature. 1993 Sep 2;365(6441):75–79. doi: 10.1038/365075a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Warmke J., Drysdale R., Ganetzky B. A distinct potassium channel polypeptide encoded by the Drosophila eag locus. Science. 1991 Jun 14;252(5012):1560–1562. doi: 10.1126/science.1840699. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Wei A., Covarrubias M., Butler A., Baker K., Pak M., Salkoff L. K+ current diversity is produced by an extended gene family conserved in Drosophila and mouse. Science. 1990 May 4;248(4955):599–603. doi: 10.1126/science.2333511. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Wu C. F., Chen M. L. Co-assembly of potassium channel subunits in Drosophila: the combinatorial hypothesis revisited. Chin J Physiol. 1995;38(3):131–138. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Wu C. F., Ganetzky B., Haugland F. N., Liu A. X. Potassium currents in Drosophila: different components affected by mutations of two genes. Science. 1983 Jun 3;220(4601):1076–1078. doi: 10.1126/science.6302847. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Wu C. F., Ganetzky B. Neurogenetic studies of ion channels in Drosophila. Ion Channels. 1992;3:261–314. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4615-3328-3_9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Wu C. F., Haugland F. N. Voltage clamp analysis of membrane currents in larval muscle fibers of Drosophila: alteration of potassium currents in Shaker mutants. J Neurosci. 1985 Oct;5(10):2626–2640. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.05-10-02626.1985. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Zerr P., Adelman J. P., Maylie J. Episodic ataxia mutations in Kv1.1 alter potassium channel function by dominant negative effects or haploinsufficiency. J Neurosci. 1998 Apr 15;18(8):2842–2848. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.18-08-02842.1998. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Zhong Y., Wu C. F. Alteration of four identified K+ currents in Drosophila muscle by mutations in eag. Science. 1991 Jun 14;252(5012):1562–1564. doi: 10.1126/science.2047864. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Zhong Y., Wu C. F. Modulation of different K+ currents in Drosophila: a hypothetical role for the Eag subunit in multimeric K+ channels. J Neurosci. 1993 Nov;13(11):4669–4679. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.13-11-04669.1993. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Biophysical Journal are provided here courtesy of The Biophysical Society

RESOURCES