Skip to main content
PMC home page
Biophysical Journal logoLink to Biophysical Journal
. 2000 Nov;79(5):2290–2304. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(00)76475-7

Effect of overall feedback inhibition in unbranched biosynthetic pathways.

R Alves 1, M A Savageau 1
PMCID: PMC1301117  PMID: 11053109

Abstract

We have determined the effects of control by overall feedback inhibition on the systemic behavior of unbranched metabolic pathways with an arbitrary pattern of other feedback inhibitions by using a recently developed numerical generalization of Mathematically Controlled Comparisons, a method for comparing the function of alternative molecular designs. This method allows the rigorous determination of the changes in systemic properties that can be exclusively attributed to overall feedback inhibition. Analytical results show that the unbranched pathway can achieve the same steady-state flux, concentrations, and logarithmic gains with respect to changes in substrate, with or without overall feedback inhibition. The analytical approach also shows that control by overall feedback inhibition amplifies the regulation of flux by the demand for end product while attenuating the sensitivity of the concentrations to the same demand. This approach does not provide a clear answer regarding the effect of overall feedback inhibition on the robustness, stability, and transient time of the pathway. However, the generalized numerical method we have used does clarify the answers to these questions. On average, an unbranched pathway with control by overall feedback inhibition is less sensitive to perturbations in the values of the parameters that define the system. The difference in robustness can range from a few percent to fifty percent or more, depending on the length of the pathway and on the metabolite one considers. On average, overall feedback inhibition decreases the stability margins by a minimal amount (typically less than 5%). Finally, and again on average, stable systems with overall feedback inhibition respond faster to fluctuations in the metabolite concentrations. Taken together, these results show that control by overall feedback inhibition confers several functional advantages upon unbranched pathways. These advantages provide a rationale for the prevalence of this control mechanism in unbranched metabolic pathways in vivo.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (159.2 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Alves R., Savageau M. A. Comparing systemic properties of ensembles of biological networks by graphical and statistical methods. Bioinformatics. 2000 Jun;16(6):527–533. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/16.6.527. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Alves R., Savageau M. A. Systemic properties of ensembles of metabolic networks: application of graphical and statistical methods to simple unbranched pathways. Bioinformatics. 2000 Jun;16(6):534–547. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/16.6.534. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Costalat R., Burger J. Effect of enzyme organization on the stability of Yates-Pardee pathways. Bull Math Biol. 1996 Jul;58(4):719–737. doi: 10.1007/BF02459479. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Hlavacek W. S., Savageau M. A. Completely uncoupled and perfectly coupled gene expression in repressible systems. J Mol Biol. 1997 Feb 28;266(3):538–558. doi: 10.1006/jmbi.1996.0811. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Hunding A. Limit-cycles in enzyme-systems with nonlinear negative feedback. Biophys Struct Mech. 1974 Oct 28;1(1):47–54. doi: 10.1007/BF01022559. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Irvine D. H., Savageau M. A. Network regulation of the immune response: alternative control points for suppressor modulation of effector lymphocytes. J Immunol. 1985 Apr;134(4):2100–2116. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Koch A. L. Metabolic control through reflexive enzyme action. J Theor Biol. 1967 Apr;15(1):75–102. doi: 10.1016/0022-5193(67)90045-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Morales M., McKay D. Biochemical oscillations in "controlled" systems. Biophys J. 1967 Sep;7(5):621–625. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(67)86611-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. PARDEE A. B., YATES R. A. Control of pyrimidine biosynthesis in Escherichia coli by a feed-back mechanism. J Biol Chem. 1956 Aug;221(2):757–770. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Rapp P. Analysis of biochemical phase shift oscillators by a harmonic balancing technique. J Math Biol. 1976 Nov 25;3(3-4):203–224. doi: 10.1007/BF00275057. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Savageau M. A. Biochemical systems analysis. II. The steady-state solutions for an n-pool system using a power-law approximation. J Theor Biol. 1969 Dec;25(3):370–379. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5193(69)80027-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Savageau M. A. Concepts relating the behavior of biochemical systems to their underlying molecular properties. Arch Biochem Biophys. 1971 Aug;145(2):612–621. doi: 10.1016/s0003-9861(71)80021-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Savageau M. A. Optimal design of feedback control by inhibition. J Mol Evol. 1974 Nov 29;4(2):139–156. doi: 10.1007/BF01732019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Savageau M. A. Optimal design of feedback control by inhibition: dynamic considerations. J Mol Evol. 1975 Aug 5;5(3):199–222. doi: 10.1007/BF01741242. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Savageau M. A. Parameter sensitivity as a criterion for evaluating and comparing the performance of biochemical systems. Nature. 1971 Feb 19;229(5286):542–544. doi: 10.1038/229542a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Shiraishi F., Savageau M. A. The tricarboxylic acid cycle in Dictyostelium discoideum. II. Evaluation of model consistency and robustness. J Biol Chem. 1992 Nov 15;267(32):22919–22925. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. UMBARGER H. E. Evidence for a negative-feedback mechanism in the biosynthesis of isoleucine. Science. 1956 May 11;123(3202):848–848. doi: 10.1126/science.123.3202.848. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Walter C. F. The occurrence and the significance of limit cycle behavior in controlled biochemical systems. J Theor Biol. 1970 May;27(2):259–272. doi: 10.1016/0022-5193(70)90141-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Walter C. Stability of controlled biological systems. J Theor Biol. 1969 Apr;23(1):23–38. doi: 10.1016/0022-5193(69)90065-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Walter C. The absolute stability of certain types of controlled biological systems. J Theor Biol. 1969 Apr;23(1):39–52. doi: 10.1016/0022-5193(69)90066-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Biophysical Journal are provided here courtesy of The Biophysical Society

RESOURCES