Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Biophysical Journal logoLink to Biophysical Journal
. 2000 Dec;79(6):3036–3051. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(00)76539-8

The first extracellular loop domain is a major determinant of charge selectivity in connexin46 channels.

E B Trexler 1, F F Bukauskas 1, J Kronengold 1, T A Bargiello 1, V K Verselis 1
PMCID: PMC1301181  PMID: 11106610

Abstract

Intercellular channels formed of members of the gene family of connexins (Cxs) vary from being substantially cation selective to being anion selective. We took advantage of the ability of Cx46 to function as an unopposed hemichannel to examine the basis of Cx charge selectivity. Previously we showed Cx46 hemichannels to be large pores that predominantly conduct cations and inwardly rectify in symmetric salts, properties suggesting selectivity is influenced by fixed negative charges located toward the extracellular end of the pore. Here we demonstrate that high ionic strength solutions applied to the extracellular, but not the intracellular, side of Cx46 hemichannels substantially reduce the ratio of cation to anion permeability. Substitution of the first extracellular loop (E1) domain of Cx32, an anion-preferring Cx, reduces conductance, converts Cx46 from cation to anion preferring, and changes the I-V relation form inwardly to outwardly rectifying. These data suggest that fixed negative charges influencing selectivity in Cx46 are located in E1 and are substantially reduced and/or are replaced with positive charges from the Cx32 E1 sequence. Extending studies to Cx46 cell-cell channels, we show that they maintain a strong preference for cations, have a conductance nearly that expected by the series addition of hemichannels, but lack rectification in symmetric salts. These properties are consistent with preservation of the fixed charge region in E1 of hemichannels, which upon docking, become symmetrically placed near the center of the cell-cell channel pore. Furthermore, heterotypic cell-cell channels formed by pairing Cx46 with Cx32 or Cx43 rectify in symmetric salts in accordance with the differences in the charges we ascribed to E1. These data are consistent with charged residues in E1 facing the channel lumen and playing an important role in determining Cx channel conductance and selectivity.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (484.7 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Adams D. J., Dwyer T. M., Hille B. The permeability of endplate channels to monovalent and divalent metal cations. J Gen Physiol. 1980 May;75(5):493–510. doi: 10.1085/jgp.75.5.493. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Andersen O. S., Koeppe R. E., 2nd Molecular determinants of channel function. Physiol Rev. 1992 Oct;72(4 Suppl):S89–158. doi: 10.1152/physrev.1992.72.suppl_4.S89. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Beblo D. A., Veenstra R. D. Monovalent cation permeation through the connexin40 gap junction channel. Cs, Rb, K, Na, Li, TEA, TMA, TBA, and effects of anions Br, Cl, F, acetate, aspartate, glutamate, and NO3. J Gen Physiol. 1997 Apr;109(4):509–522. doi: 10.1085/jgp.109.4.509. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Bennett M. V., Barrio L. C., Bargiello T. A., Spray D. C., Hertzberg E., Sáez J. C. Gap junctions: new tools, new answers, new questions. Neuron. 1991 Mar;6(3):305–320. doi: 10.1016/0896-6273(91)90241-q. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Bennett M. V., Spira M. E., Spray D. C. Permeability of gap junctions between embryonic cells of Fundulus: a reevaluation. Dev Biol. 1978 Jul;65(1):114–125. doi: 10.1016/0012-1606(78)90184-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Bennett M. V., Zheng X., Sogin M. L. The connexins and their family tree. Soc Gen Physiol Ser. 1994;49:223–233. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Bevans C. G., Kordel M., Rhee S. K., Harris A. L. Isoform composition of connexin channels determines selectivity among second messengers and uncharged molecules. J Biol Chem. 1998 Jan 30;273(5):2808–2816. doi: 10.1074/jbc.273.5.2808. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Bezrukov S. M., Vodyanoy I. Probing alamethicin channels with water-soluble polymers. Effect on conductance of channel states. Biophys J. 1993 Jan;64(1):16–25. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(93)81336-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Boitano S., Dirksen E. R., Sanderson M. J. Intercellular propagation of calcium waves mediated by inositol trisphosphate. Science. 1992 Oct 9;258(5080):292–295. doi: 10.1126/science.1411526. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Brink P. R., Dewey M. M. Evidence for fixed charge in the nexus. Nature. 1980 May 8;285(5760):101–102. doi: 10.1038/285101a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Brink P. R. Effect of deuterium oxide on junctional membrane channel permeability. J Membr Biol. 1983;71(1-2):79–87. doi: 10.1007/BF01870676. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Bruzzone R., White T. W., Paul D. L. Connections with connexins: the molecular basis of direct intercellular signaling. Eur J Biochem. 1996 May 15;238(1):1–27. doi: 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1996.0001q.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Bukauskas F. F., Elfgang C., Willecke K., Weingart R. Biophysical properties of gap junction channels formed by mouse connexin40 in induced pairs of transfected human HeLa cells. Biophys J. 1995 Jun;68(6):2289–2298. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(95)80411-X. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Bukauskas F. F., Elfgang C., Willecke K., Weingart R. Heterotypic gap junction channels (connexin26-connexin32) violate the paradigm of unitary conductance. Pflugers Arch. 1995 Apr;429(6):870–872. doi: 10.1007/BF00374812. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Cao F., Eckert R., Elfgang C., Nitsche J. M., Snyder S. A., H-ulser D. F., Willecke K., Nicholson B. J. A quantitative analysis of connexin-specific permeability differences of gap junctions expressed in HeLa transfectants and Xenopus oocytes. J Cell Sci. 1998 Jan;111(Pt 1):31–43. doi: 10.1242/jcs.111.1.31. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Chen D. P., Xu L., Tripathy A., Meissner G., Eisenberg B. Selectivity and permeation in calcium release channel of cardiac muscle: alkali metal ions. Biophys J. 1999 Mar;76(3):1346–1366. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(99)77297-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Chen D., Lear J., Eisenberg B. Permeation through an open channel: Poisson-Nernst-Planck theory of a synthetic ionic channel. Biophys J. 1997 Jan;72(1):97–116. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(97)78650-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. D'Andrea P., Vittur F. Gap junctions mediate intercellular calcium signalling in cultured articular chondrocytes. Cell Calcium. 1996 Nov;20(5):389–397. doi: 10.1016/s0143-4160(96)90001-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Doyle D. A., Morais Cabral J., Pfuetzner R. A., Kuo A., Gulbis J. M., Cohen S. L., Chait B. T., MacKinnon R. The structure of the potassium channel: molecular basis of K+ conduction and selectivity. Science. 1998 Apr 3;280(5360):69–77. doi: 10.1126/science.280.5360.69. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Ebihara L., Steiner E. Properties of a nonjunctional current expressed from a rat connexin46 cDNA in Xenopus oocytes. J Gen Physiol. 1993 Jul;102(1):59–74. doi: 10.1085/jgp.102.1.59. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Eisenman G., Horn R. Ionic selectivity revisited: the role of kinetic and equilibrium processes in ion permeation through channels. J Membr Biol. 1983;76(3):197–225. doi: 10.1007/BF01870364. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Elfgang C., Eckert R., Lichtenberg-Fraté H., Butterweck A., Traub O., Klein R. A., Hülser D. F., Willecke K. Specific permeability and selective formation of gap junction channels in connexin-transfected HeLa cells. J Cell Biol. 1995 May;129(3):805–817. doi: 10.1083/jcb.129.3.805. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Finkbeiner S. Calcium waves in astrocytes-filling in the gaps. Neuron. 1992 Jun;8(6):1101–1108. doi: 10.1016/0896-6273(92)90131-v. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Flagg-Newton J., Simpson I., Loewenstein W. R. Permeability of the cell-to-cell membrane channels in mammalian cell juncton. Science. 1979 Jul 27;205(4404):404–407. doi: 10.1126/science.377490. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Green W. N., Andersen O. S. Surface charges and ion channel function. Annu Rev Physiol. 1991;53:341–359. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ph.53.030191.002013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Hu X., Dahl G. Exchange of conductance and gating properties between gap junction hemichannels. FEBS Lett. 1999 May 21;451(2):113–117. doi: 10.1016/s0014-5793(99)00558-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Imoto K., Busch C., Sakmann B., Mishina M., Konno T., Nakai J., Bujo H., Mori Y., Fukuda K., Numa S. Rings of negatively charged amino acids determine the acetylcholine receptor channel conductance. Nature. 1988 Oct 13;335(6191):645–648. doi: 10.1038/335645a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Kienker P. K., DeGrado W. F., Lear J. D. A helical-dipole model describes the single-channel current rectification of an uncharged peptide ion channel. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1994 May 24;91(11):4859–4863. doi: 10.1073/pnas.91.11.4859. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Kienker P. K., Lear J. D. Charge selectivity of the designed uncharged peptide ion channel Ac-(LSSLLSL)3-CONH2. Biophys J. 1995 Apr;68(4):1347–1358. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(95)80307-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Kohen E., Kohen C., Thorell B., Mintz D. H., Rabinovitch A. Intercellular communication in pancreatic islet monolayer cultures: a microfluorometric study. Science. 1979 May 25;204(4395):862–865. doi: 10.1126/science.35828. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Lawrence T. S., Beers W. H., Gilula N. B. Transmission of hormonal stimulation by cell-to-cell communication. Nature. 1978 Apr 6;272(5653):501–506. doi: 10.1038/272501a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Lo C. W. Genes, gene knockouts, and mutations in the analysis of gap junctions. Dev Genet. 1999;24(1-2):1–4. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1520-6408(1999)24:1/2<1::AID-DVG1>3.0.CO;2-U. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Mills S. L., Massey S. C. Differential properties of two gap junctional pathways made by AII amacrine cells. Nature. 1995 Oct 26;377(6551):734–737. doi: 10.1038/377734a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Nelles E., Bützler C., Jung D., Temme A., Gabriel H. D., Dahl U., Traub O., Stümpel F., Jungermann K., Zielasek J. Defective propagation of signals generated by sympathetic nerve stimulation in the liver of connexin32-deficient mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1996 Sep 3;93(18):9565–9570. doi: 10.1073/pnas.93.18.9565. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Neyton J., Trautmann A. Single-channel currents of an intercellular junction. 1985 Sep 26-Oct 2Nature. 317(6035):331–335. doi: 10.1038/317331a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Niessen H., Harz H., Bedner P., Krämer K., Willecke K. Selective permeability of different connexin channels to the second messenger inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate. J Cell Sci. 2000 Apr;113(Pt 8):1365–1372. doi: 10.1242/jcs.113.8.1365. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Niessen H., Willecke K. Strongly decreased gap junctional permeability to inositol 1,4, 5-trisphosphate in connexin32 deficient hepatocytes. FEBS Lett. 2000 Jan 21;466(1):112–114. doi: 10.1016/s0014-5793(99)01770-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Nonner W., Chen D. P., Eisenberg B. Anomalous mole fraction effect, electrostatics, and binding in ionic channels. Biophys J. 1998 May;74(5):2327–2334. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(98)77942-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Nonner W., Eisenberg B. Ion permeation and glutamate residues linked by Poisson-Nernst-Planck theory in L-type calcium channels. Biophys J. 1998 Sep;75(3):1287–1305. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(98)74048-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Oh S., Ri Y., Bennett M. V., Trexler E. B., Verselis V. K., Bargiello T. A. Changes in permeability caused by connexin 32 mutations underlie X-linked Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease. Neuron. 1997 Oct;19(4):927–938. doi: 10.1016/s0896-6273(00)80973-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Oh S., Rubin J. B., Bennett M. V., Verselis V. K., Bargiello T. A. Molecular determinants of electrical rectification of single channel conductance in gap junctions formed by connexins 26 and 32. J Gen Physiol. 1999 Sep;114(3):339–364. doi: 10.1085/jgp.114.3.339. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Paul D. L., Ebihara L., Takemoto L. J., Swenson K. I., Goodenough D. A. Connexin46, a novel lens gap junction protein, induces voltage-gated currents in nonjunctional plasma membrane of Xenopus oocytes. J Cell Biol. 1991 Nov;115(4):1077–1089. doi: 10.1083/jcb.115.4.1077. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Pitts J. D., Simms J. W. Permeability of junctions between animal cells. Intercellular transfer of nucleotides but not of macromolecules. Exp Cell Res. 1977 Jan;104(1):153–163. doi: 10.1016/0014-4827(77)90078-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Roux B., Karplus M. Molecular dynamics simulations of the gramicidin channel. Annu Rev Biophys Biomol Struct. 1994;23:731–761. doi: 10.1146/annurev.bb.23.060194.003503. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Roux B., MacKinnon R. The cavity and pore helices in the KcsA K+ channel: electrostatic stabilization of monovalent cations. Science. 1999 Jul 2;285(5424):100–102. doi: 10.1126/science.285.5424.100. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Rubin J. B., Verselis V. K., Bennett M. V., Bargiello T. A. A domain substitution procedure and its use to analyze voltage dependence of homotypic gap junctions formed by connexins 26 and 32. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1992 May 1;89(9):3820–3824. doi: 10.1073/pnas.89.9.3820. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Rubin J. B., Verselis V. K., Bennett M. V., Bargiello T. A. Molecular analysis of voltage dependence of heterotypic gap junctions formed by connexins 26 and 32. Biophys J. 1992 Apr;62(1):183–195. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(92)81804-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Schwarzmann G., Wiegandt H., Rose B., Zimmerman A., Ben-Haim D., Loewenstein W. R. Diameter of the cell-to-cell junctional membrane channels as probed with neutral molecules. Science. 1981 Jul 31;213(4507):551–553. doi: 10.1126/science.7244653. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Sheridan J. D., Finbow M. E., Pitts J. D. Metabolic interactions between animal cells through permeable intercellular junctions. Exp Cell Res. 1979 Oct 1;123(1):111–117. doi: 10.1016/0014-4827(79)90427-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Sneyd J., Wilkins M., Strahonja A., Sanderson M. J. Calcium waves and oscillations driven by an intercellular gradient of inositol (1,4,5)-trisphosphate. Biophys Chem. 1998 May 5;72(1-2):101–109. doi: 10.1016/s0301-4622(98)00126-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Subak-Sharpe H., Bürk R. R., Pitts J. D. Metabolic co-operation between biochemically marked mammalian cells in tissue culture. J Cell Sci. 1969 Mar;4(2):353–367. doi: 10.1242/jcs.4.2.353. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Suchyna T. M., Nitsche J. M., Chilton M., Harris A. L., Veenstra R. D., Nicholson B. J. Different ionic selectivities for connexins 26 and 32 produce rectifying gap junction channels. Biophys J. 1999 Dec;77(6):2968–2987. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(99)77129-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Sáez J. C., Connor J. A., Spray D. C., Bennett M. V. Hepatocyte gap junctions are permeable to the second messenger, inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate, and to calcium ions. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1989 Apr;86(8):2708–2712. doi: 10.1073/pnas.86.8.2708. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Trexler E. B., Bennett M. V., Bargiello T. A., Verselis V. K. Voltage gating and permeation in a gap junction hemichannel. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1996 Jun 11;93(12):5836–5841. doi: 10.1073/pnas.93.12.5836. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Unger V. M., Kumar N. M., Gilula N. B., Yeager M. Three-dimensional structure of a recombinant gap junction membrane channel. Science. 1999 Feb 19;283(5405):1176–1180. doi: 10.1126/science.283.5405.1176. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. Vaney D. I., Nelson J. C., Pow D. V. Neurotransmitter coupling through gap junctions in the retina. J Neurosci. 1998 Dec 15;18(24):10594–10602. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.18-24-10594.1998. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. Veenstra R. D., Wang H. Z., Beyer E. C., Brink P. R. Selective dye and ionic permeability of gap junction channels formed by connexin45. Circ Res. 1994 Sep;75(3):483–490. doi: 10.1161/01.res.75.3.483. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. Veenstra R. D., Wang H. Z., Beyer E. C., Ramanan S. V., Brink P. R. Connexin37 forms high conductance gap junction channels with subconductance state activity and selective dye and ionic permeabilities. Biophys J. 1994 Jun;66(6):1915–1928. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(94)80985-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  59. Verselis V. K., Ginter C. S., Bargiello T. A. Opposite voltage gating polarities of two closely related connexins. Nature. 1994 Mar 24;368(6469):348–351. doi: 10.1038/368348a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  60. Verselis V., Brink P. R. The gap junction channel. Its aqueous nature as indicated by deuterium oxide effects. Biophys J. 1986 Nov;50(5):1003–1007. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(86)83542-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  61. Wang H. Z., Veenstra R. D. Monovalent ion selectivity sequences of the rat connexin43 gap junction channel. J Gen Physiol. 1997 Apr;109(4):491–507. doi: 10.1085/jgp.109.4.491. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  62. White T. W., Paul D. L. Genetic diseases and gene knockouts reveal diverse connexin functions. Annu Rev Physiol. 1999;61:283–310. doi: 10.1146/annurev.physiol.61.1.283. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  63. Willecke K., Kirchhoff S., Plum A., Temme A., Thönnissen E., Ott T. Biological functions of connexin genes revealed by human genetic defects, dominant negative approaches and targeted deletions in the mouse. Novartis Found Symp. 1999;219:76–96. doi: 10.1002/9780470515587.ch6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  64. Wilson G. G., Pascual J. M., Brooijmans N., Murray D., Karlin A. The intrinsic electrostatic potential and the intermediate ring of charge in the acetylcholine receptor channel. J Gen Physiol. 2000 Feb;115(2):93–106. doi: 10.1085/jgp.115.2.93. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  65. Young S. H., Ennes H. S., Mayer E. A. Propagation of calcium waves between colonic smooth muscle cells in culture. Cell Calcium. 1996 Sep;20(3):257–271. doi: 10.1016/s0143-4160(96)90031-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  66. Zhou X. W., Pfahnl A., Werner R., Hudder A., Llanes A., Luebke A., Dahl G. Identification of a pore lining segment in gap junction hemichannels. Biophys J. 1997 May;72(5):1946–1953. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(97)78840-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Biophysical Journal are provided here courtesy of The Biophysical Society

RESOURCES