Abstract
Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST) are rare sarcomas arising predominantly in the stomach and small intestine, with limited incidence in other gastrointestinal sites. GIST originates from c-KIT–/DOG1-positive interstitial cells of Cajal (ICC) most commonly driven by activating gain-of-function mutations in the c-KIT and PDGFRA genes. However, a subset of these malignancies, defined as wild-type GIST (WT-GIST), has mutations in the RAS pathway genes (e.g., NF1, KRAS, and BRAF), succinate dehydrogenase subunit genes, and rare gene fusions. A major obstacle in understanding WT-GIST pathogenesis and treatment resistance has been the lack of robust in vivo models. In this study, we report the development of a fully penetrant mouse model of BRAF-driven GIST by inducing BRAFV600E expression in c-Kit+ ICC. Unlike previous models which targeted only subsets of ICC leading to hyperplasia, the use of c-KitCreERT2 enables broader targeting, including ICC progenitors, resulting in rapid, multifocal tumor formation primarily in the pyloric region. These tumors express diagnostic GIST markers (c-Kit and DOG1) and show significant response to the BRAF inhibitor dabrafenib. This model recapitulates key histopathologic and molecular features of human BRAF-mutant GIST and provides a valuable platform for studying tumor initiation, progression, and therapeutic resistance. Importantly, it allows for preclinical testing of targeted therapies in BRAF GIST, offering new insights into treatment strategies.
Significance:
This is the first fully penetrant mouse model of BRAF-driven GIST by inducing BRAFV600E in c-Kit+ ICC. This model faithfully recapitulates human BRAF-mutant GIST, enabling mechanistic studies and preclinical testing of targeted therapies, including response to BRAF inhibition with dabrafenib.
Introduction
Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST) represent a heterogeneous group of mesenchymal neoplasms arising predominantly within the gastrointestinal (GI) tract, particularly the stomach and small intestine. These tumors originate from the interstitial cells of Cajal (ICC), a specialized population of cells within the tunica muscularis responsible for generating the electrical slow waves that regulate gut motility (1–5). ICC express key markers such as c-KIT (CD117) and DOG1 (ANO1), which serve as diagnostic hallmarks in the vast majority of GIST cases (4–7). Approximately 85% of GISTs harbor gain-of-function mutations in the receptor tyrosine kinases KIT (most commonly in exon 11) or PDGFRA (typically in exon 18), resulting in constitutive, ligand-independent activation of downstream signaling pathways (8–10). These molecular insights have led to the development and clinical implementation of targeted therapies, particularly tyrosine kinase inhibitors such as imatinib, sunitinib, regorafenib, and ripretinib (11–14). The remaining ∼15% of cases, known as wild-type GIST (WT-GIST), lack mutations in both KIT and PDGFRA. Genomic studies have revealed diverse molecular alterations among WT-GIST (15–18). A significant proportion of these tumors display mutations in subunits of the mitochondrial enzyme succinate dehydrogenase (SDH) and are classified as SDH-deficient GIST (SDH-GIST; ref. 15). These tumors are especially prevalent in pediatric and young adult populations and are characterized by distinct molecular, clinical, and histopathologic features (6, 18). Other rare subtypes of WT-GIST involve mutations or alterations in the RAS–MEK–MAPK signaling pathway, including genes such as BRAF, NF1, and KRAS (19–25), as well as gene fusions involving NTRK and FGFR (26–28). Among these, activating mutations in BRAF, particularly the BRAFV600E allele, are found in approximately 1% to 3% of human GIST cases. Despite advances in molecular profiling, few preclinical in vivo models exist for studying WT-GIST. One study conditionally expressed BRAFV600E in ICC using an inducible Etv1CreERT2 driver (29). Although Etv1 is restricted to myenteric (ICC-MY) and intramuscular (ICC-IM) ICC subsets, BRAFV600E expression alone resulted only in hyperplasia—not fully developed GIST-like lesions—even in homozygous mice observed for 6 to 15 months. Concurrent loss of Trp53 in this model led to multifocal GIST-like tumors with 100% penetrance, implicating additional tumor suppressor loss as a critical co-factor in GIST pathogenesis. In a separate study, BRAFV600E was expressed in smooth muscle cells via the Myh11CreERT2 driver (30). This approach yielded GI malignancies with approximately 36% penetrance, suggesting that, under certain conditions, smooth muscle cells could serve as an alternative cell of origin for GIST.
In this study, we investigated the tumorigenic potential of BRAFV600E in a broader range of ICC using the validated c-KitCreERT2 mouse model (2, 3, 31). Notably, BRAFV600E expression alone was sufficient to induce both GI hyperplasia and GIST-like tumors within just 3 weeks after induction. These tumors also demonstrated responsiveness to the BRAF inhibitor dabrafenib, supporting the translational relevance of this model for preclinical therapeutic evaluation. Our findings underscore the utility of this model not only in understanding BRAFV600E-driven GIST tumorigenesis but also in exploring mechanisms of drug resistance and novel treatment strategies (20, 21). Given the unmet need for robust animal models of WT-GIST, particularly those with defined molecular drivers, these results provide a new in vivo tool for the field.
Materials and Methods
Mouse models
Mouse strains used in this study include c-KitCreERT2 (1); BRAFV600E (RRID: IMSR, JAX:017837); β-Actin-Cre (RRID: IMSR_JAX:033984); and Rosa26mTmG (RRID: IMSR JAX:007676). Mice were housed under specific pathogen-free conditions with ad libitum access to food and water. Tamoxifen (Sigma-Aldrich T5648) was prepared at a concentration of 10 mg/mL in corn oil (Sigma-Aldrich C8267) as per established protocol in the Jackson Laboratory (Bar Harbor, ME) website. Dabrafenib [HY-14660, MedChemExpress; dissolved in 10% DMSO, 40% polyethylene glycol, 5% polysorbate (Tween 80), and 45% saline] was administered at 100 mg/kg by oral gavage every other day, three times a week (Monday, Wednesday, and Friday) for 4 weeks (12 dosages). All procedures were approved by the NCI-Frederick Animal Care and Use Committee and followed NIH animal welfare guidelines.
Immunofluorescence
Stomachs from c-KitCreERT2/+; Rosa26mTmG/+ and c-KitCreERT2/+ mice were harvested 10 days after tamoxifen (TAM) induction. Tissues were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde (2 hours at room temperature), cryoprotected overnight in 30% sucrose at 4°C, embedded, and sectioned at 40 μm. Native fluorescence was imaged using a Zeiss LSM 880 confocal microscope without further staining.
IHC and pathology
Complete necropsy was performed on all major organs. Gastric dilation with muscular wall thickening and pyloric obstruction was routinely observed. Tissues (stomach, duodenum, jejunum, ileum, cecum, and colon) were fixed in 10% neutral buffered formalin, paraffin embedded, and sectioned (5 μm) for hematoxylin and eosin staining.
Histologic grading of ICC lesions was performed as described in the “Results” section. IHC was performed on a Leica Bond RX autostainer using the Bond Polymer Refine Detection Kit (#DS9800, Leica Biosystems; minus post-primary). Retrieval conditions and antibodies were
| Marker | Retrieval | Antibody | Dilution | RRID |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DOG1 | Citrate (20′) | Thermo Fisher Scientific MA5-16358 | 1:25 | AB_2537877 |
| c-Kit | EDTA (20′) | Cell Signaling Technology 3074 | 1:100 | AB_1147633 |
Negative controls used Cell Signaling Technology isotype control IgG (#3900, RRID: AB_1550038). Slides were dehydrated in graded ethanol, cleared with xylene, and coverslipped.
Results
The c-KitCreERT2 allele induces cre expression in the c-Kit–positive ICC
As ICCs are the putative GIST cell of origin, we introduced the BRAFV600E conditional allele in c-kit (KIT)–positive ICC using the validated c-KitCreERT2 mouse model (1–3, 32). The efficacy of the c-KitCreERT2 allele to induce cre expression was tested with the double-fluorescent R26mT-mG/+ reporter mouse line (Fig. 1; ref. 1). A single TAM injection (75 mg/kg, i.p.) at postnatal day 20 (P20) induced EGFP expression in ICC of the gastric muscularis by postnatal day 30 (Fig. 1B), suggesting that the c-KitCreERT2 allele provides an effective means to induce cre expression in the c-Kit–positive ICC cellular network.
Figure 1.
Targeting c-Kit–positive ICC. A, Timing of the protocol used to target mouse ICC with the c-KitCreERT2 driver. Mice were injected intraperitoneal (i.p.) with TAM (75 mg/kg) at postnatal day 20 (P20) and analyzed at postnatal day 30 (P30). B, Representative confocal images of the stomach wall of uninjected (−TAM) or TAM injected (+TAM) mice with the c-KitCreERT2/+ and the R26mT-mG reporter allele. The R26mT-mG allele induces tdTomato expression ubiquitously and after cre-mediated removal of tdTomato promotes EGFP expression. Note, activation of EGFP-expressing c-Kit–positive ICC within the tunica muscularis of c-KitCreERT2/+; R26mT-mG TAM-injected mice, suggesting ICC are efficiently targeted. DIC, differential interference contrast.
BRAF V600E activation in c-Kit+ ICC drives hyperplasia and GIST-like lesions
The BRAFV600E mutation is a rare genetic alteration affecting the RAS/RAF/MAPK pathway in WT-GIST. To determine whether BRAFV600E is sufficient to drive GIST, we expressed the allele in c-Kit+ ICCs via c-KitCreERT2. Prior models using Etv1- or Lrig1-driven expression produced hyperplasia without full transformation unless combined with Trp53 loss or smooth muscle–specific promoters (29, 30). To test whether (i) BRAFV600E was insufficient to induce GIST, (ii) the specific ICC population leading to tumor formation was not targeted in the previous studies or (iii) these tumors derive from an alternative cell of origin, we used the c-KitCreERT2 allele to induce cre expression in a broader population of ICC, including ICC precursor cells. Strikingly, all BRAFV600E;c-KitCreERT2 mice developed severe signs of distress, including immobility, hunched posture, and abnormal abdomen shape and had to be sacrificed at about 3 weeks after TAM administration (Supplementary Table S1). At necropsy, all animals showed an extremely dilated and distended stomach filled with air and fluids (Fig. 2A). Pathologic and histologic assessment revealed that the stomach dilation was caused by a pyloric annular constriction which highly reduced gastric outflow into the small intestine, promoting accumulation of fluids and air in the lumen of the stomach. Further analysis showed nodular formation of infiltrative neoplastic cells that circumferentially expanded the tunica muscularis at the region of the gastroduodenal junction in all animals, suggesting that this was most likely the cause of the gastroduodenal occlusion (Fig. 2B). In about 40% of the animals, the neoplastic aggregates were consistent with GIST-like lesions that displayed pleomorphic and occasionally spindloid cells. Other features consisting of moderate levels of anisokaryosis, anisocytosis, and karyomegalic cells containing open chromatin and distinct nucleoli were also noticeable within the neoplastic lesions (Fig. 2C and D). Although the pyloric region was by far the most consistently and severely affected site, many nodular aggregates of hyperplastic/preneoplastic cells were also present in the tunica muscularis of the stomach or small and large intestine wall. These nodular aggregates were often infiltrating the adjacent muscle fibers, with focal, multifocal, and coalescing nodular proliferative lesions (Fig. 2E and F), although complete necropsy revealed no signs of metastasis. Tumor cells also expressed c-KIT (KIT) and DOG1 (ANO1), a key feature of human GIST diagnosis, from the initial stages of nodular cell aggregates to more advanced stages of GIST (Fig. 3; Supplementary Fig. S1). These findings indicate that BRAFV600E activation in ICC is sufficient to initiate GIST-like tumors, with lethality likely limiting full progression in some cases.
Figure 2.
The BRAFV600E mutation in c-Kit–positive ICCs leads to severe hyperplasia and GIST formation. A, Representative image of the distended stomach developed by the c-KitCreERT2/+; BRAFV600E/+-mutant animals about 3 weeks after 75 mg/kg TAM administration. B, Low-power image of a hematoxylin and eosin–stained section of the pyloric region from a TAM-induced animal as in A. Note the nodular aggregates of cells circumferentially expanding the tunica muscularis at the pyloric region. Black arrows indicate the gastroduodenal constriction. C, Low-power image of a hematoxylin and eosin–stained section of the pyloric region of TAM-induced BRAFV600E animal showing a GIST in the tunica muscularis (arrowhead). D, High-power image of a GIST-like lesion showing pleomorphic and spindeloid cells. Note the moderate anisokaryosis and anisocytosis and karyomegalic cells containing open chromatin and distinct nucleoli (arrow heads). E and F, Representative images of hematoxylin and eosin sections from BRAFV600E mice showing nodular (E) and multinodular (F) aggregates of hyperplastic cells within the tunica muscularis along the stomach and intestine (arrow heads). H&E, hematoxylin and eosin.
Figure 3.
Mouse GIST lesions express the typical molecular markers of human GIST, Dog1 and c-Kit. A–D, Representative histologic images of GIST-like lesions from the pyloric area of BRAFV600E-mutant mice stained with hematoxylin and eosin (A and C) showing aggregates of coalescing hyperplastic cells. Note, these lesions express the typical molecular markers of human GIST, Dog1 (B) and c-Kit (D). H&E, hematoxylin and eosin.
We focused on the pyloric region because it is the most consistent site of lesions. Pylori from mutant mice were evaluated using a 0 to 5 grading system (Fig. 4). Grade 0 indicates no abnormalities detected in the pyloric sections. Grade 1, 2, and 3 indicate, respectively, focal, multifocal, and coalescing nodular hyperplasia of ICC populations associated with a minimal (1), mild (2), or moderate (3) grade of hyperplasia. Grade 4 corresponds to a severe ICC hyperplasia and more complex GIST-like lesions caused by proliferative ICC coalescing and effacing the tunica muscularis and displaying cells arranged in bundles or sheets and minimal stroma. Grade 5 indicates GIST malignancies with clear tumor masses expanding the tunica muscularis and including cellular atypia and pleomorphic morphology. This histologic grading showed that grade 4 to 5 GIST were present in 41% (five of 12) of mice (Fig. 5A).
Figure 4.
Tumor histologic grading of the pyloric regions from mutant mice. Low (left)- and high (right)-magnification images from representative hematoxylin and eosin staining of sections from the pyloric region of BRAFV600E-mutant mice 3 weeks after TAM (75 mg/kg) injection showing the typical morphology used to grade the severity of the GIST lesions. Grade 0, normal pylorus. Grades 1 and 2 represent focal and multifocal nodular hyperplasia of ICC, respectively (minimal and mild ICC hyperplasia). Grade 3 indicates coalescing nodular proliferative lesions (moderate ICC hyperplasia). Grade 4 indicates proliferative ICC coalescing and effacing the tunica muscularis with cells arranged in bundles or sheets with minimal stroma (severe ICC hyperplasia – GIST-like lesions). In grade 5, there are GIST tumors expanding from the tunica muscularis with frequent cells showing atypia and pleomorphic morphology.
Figure 5.
Activation of the BRAFV600E allele in c-Kit–positive ICCs originates hyperplasia and GIST. A, Violin plot reporting the number of c-KitCreERT2/+; BRAFV600E/+ mice with lesions of the indicated histopathologic grade as in Fig. 4 following induction with 75 or 7.5 mg/Kg TAM. B, Kaplan–Meier survival curve of c-KitCreERT2/+ (Ctrl) and c-KitCreERT2/+; BRAFV600E/+ (BRAF) mice induced with 75 mg/kg TAM (red line) or 7.5 mg/kg TAM (blue line) at 3 weeks.
As most mice die within 3 weeks after induction because of the pyloric restriction, we decided to test whether reducing TAM dose could influence the number of cells with the B-raf activation and consequently the severity of tumor development and mouse viability. We reasoned that this could help gain insights into tumor formation and progression over time. Thus, a second cohort of mice received a 10 times lower TAM dose (7.5 mg/kg). At 3 months after injection, survival was 75% in the BRAF low-dose TAM animals (Fig. 5B). Moreover, histopathologic analysis of the stomach and pyloric region of sick mice showed that animals in the low-dose group stratified over milder pathology grades when compared with the higher dose (Fig. 5A; Supplementary Table S1). These data indicate that dosing TAM can allow for control of tumor penetrance and expand our temporal analysis of BRAFV600E-driven GIST lesions (Fig. 5).
Dabrafenib partially rescues the GIST phenotype in mutant mice
Given the clinical use of dabrafenib in BRAFV600E-driven cancers, including non–small cell lung cancer, melanoma, GIST, and anaplastic thyroid cancer, we assessed its efficacy in our model (20, 21, 33–35). We chose a drug administration protocol that partially inhibits BRAF activity to test whether it could extend the life span of mice with tumors. BRAFV600E animals first received a single TAM dose (75 mg/kg) at P20 to activate the mutation in ICC. Ten days after TAM, they received dabrafenib (100 mg/kg by oral gavage) or vehicle treatment three times a week for 4 weeks (12 dosages; Fig. 6A). Although all animals receiving vehicle treatment became sick and had to be sacrificed at 3 weeks after TAM, as previously observed, mice that received dabrafenib had an overall better outcome as they survived to the end of the dabrafenib treatment (Fig. 6A). Histopathology revealed marked reduction in lesion severity, suggesting that they could be employed in studies of tumor resistance of BRAF GIST (Fig. 6B and C).
Figure 6.
BRAF-driven lesions are sensitive to the B-Raf inhibitor dabrafenib. A, Kaplan–Meier survival curve of c-KitCreERT2/+; BRAFV600E/+ (BRAF)-mutant animals injected at P20 with vehicle or 75 mg/kg TAM, followed by dabrafenib (DAB) treatment three times a week for 4 weeks (100 mg/kg) starting at P30. B, Histopathologic evaluation of the pyloric regions of mice in A according to the classification in Fig. 4. C, Representative images of hematoxylin and eosin–stained sections of the pyloric region of vehicle- and dabrafenib-treated c-KitCreERT2/+; BRAFV600E/+ animals as in A and B. Note the decreased tumor burden in the tunica muscularis of dabrafenib-treated mice (scale bar, 500 μm).
Discussion
WT-GIST represent a heterogeneous subgroup of mesenchymal malignancies of the GI tract for which there are limited therapeutic opportunities. The lack of robust genetic in vivo models has significantly limited our understanding of their molecular pathogenesis, mechanisms of resistance, and responses to targeted therapies.
In this study, we demonstrate that the expression of the oncogenic BRAFV600E allele in ICC, the putative cells of origin for GIST, is sufficient to initiate GIST formation. Importantly, we show that the resulting GIST-like lesions are responsive to treatment with the BRAF inhibitor dabrafenib. This reproduces clinical observations in GIST with a BRAFV600E mutation that responds to BRAF inhibitors (20, 21). This finding establishes a valuable preclinical platform for studying both tumor initiation and therapeutic response in the context of BRAF-mutant GIST.
Models of GIST driven by an activating mutation in KIT have been successfully developed through the introduction of an activating KIT mutation in the germline and expanded through a second-site KIT mutation targeting ETV+ cells (36, 37). However, previous attempts to generate GIST models through activation of the RAS–RAF–MAPK pathway by introducing BRAFV600E targeting ETV+ or Lrig1+ cells have been limited in their success. In these earlier models, the expression of BRAFV600E led only to focal hyperplasia, without full transformation to GIST, and lesions occurred only after prolonged latency periods ranging from 3 to 15 months (29, 30). A key distinction in our study is the choice of promoter used to drive Cre-mediated recombination. Although prior models utilized the Etv1CreERT2 and Lrig1CreERT2 lines, both of which target only subsets of ICC, we employed a c-KitCreERT2 allele, which has been shown to broadly and effectively target the entire ICC population along the GI tract (1, 32). The success of this strategy suggests that it could be applied to generate additional molecular subtypes of WT-GIST models, including SDH-deficient GIST and other rare subtypes such as NF1-null or KRAS-mutated GIST.
The spatial and developmental specificity of these promoters likely underlies the differing outcomes. Etv1 expression is limited to ICC-MY and ICC-IM subtypes and is excluded from the deep muscular (ICC-DMP) and submucosal plexus ICC (ICC-SMP; refs. 38, 39). In contrast, Lrig1 expression is largely restricted to ICC-DMP and ICC-SMP (40). Thus, both previous models may have targeted more differentiated or regionally restricted ICC subtypes, which may be less susceptible to oncogenic transformation. On the other hand, c-Kit expression spans a broader range of ICC, including precursor and progenitor populations derived from mesenchymal stem cells (41). These c-Kit–positive progenitors are likely to represent the critical population that, upon acquiring BRAFV600E, undergoes oncogenic transformation into GIST cells.
Supporting this interpretation is the well-established use of c-KIT and DOG1 (ANO1) as both lineage markers for ICC and diagnostic markers for GIST in clinical pathology (5, 42, 43). Our IHC analysis confirmed the expression of c-KIT and DOG1 in the BRAF lesions, further validating their identity as bona fide GIST. Thus, we propose that the broader targeting enabled by the c-KitCreERT2 allele is a crucial factor underlying the observed differences in tumor latency, distribution, and penetrance compared with previous models.
Our model demonstrates that BRAFV600E expression in c-Kit–positive ICC leads to rapid and multifocal hyperplasia, with the earliest and most prominent lesions occurring at the pyloric junction, a region enriched in smooth muscles and ICC (44). This regional susceptibility likely accounts for the reproducible formation of pyloric tumors and the early lethality observed in mice. These findings suggest that the pylorus may serve as a reliable and anatomically consistent site for tumor evaluation and therapeutic testing. Therapeutically, we show that treatment with dabrafenib significantly reduces tumor burden in mice harboring BRAF-mutant lesions. Here, we tested a single treatment protocol of 4 weeks (Fig. 6), but future studies should allow us to evaluate whether different dabrafenib dosages and/or treatment durations can induce tumor resistance mechanisms. Furthermore, this model should enable exploration of the combinatorial effects of other drugs such as trametinib or other MEK inhibitors (35). Together, such studies, coupled with varying TAM concentrations, should allow for extended temporal analysis of these malignancies, potentially enabling these lesions to acquire metastatic properties over time. This highlights the translational relevance of our model and suggests that it could be instrumental in testing new targeted therapies for BRAF-mutant GIST that have developed drug resistance.
In summary, we have developed a novel, genetically defined and fully penetrant mouse model of WT-GIST driven by BRAFV600E. This is the first in vivo model to recapitulate the full spectrum of key molecular and histopathologic features of human BRAF-mutant GIST. Its rapid and reproducible tumor development, especially in the pyloric region, provides a robust platform for investigating tumor initiation, progression, and therapeutic resistance. Furthermore, this model opens the door for preclinical testing of novel therapies and combination strategies targeting the diverse molecular landscape of WT-GIST, including RAS-/MAPK-driven subtypes.
Supplementary Material
Supplementary Figure 1. Expression of Dog1 and c-kit in developing mouse GIST lesions.
Supplementary Table 1. Summary of the mouse data from the experiments using tamoxifen at the concentration of 75 and 7.5 mg/kg and the BRAF inhibitor 'Dabrafenib'.
Acknowledgments
We would like to thank Chengkai Dai, Peter Johnson, Jonathan Keller, Kathrin Muegge, Shyam Sharan, Brad St. Croix, and Esta Sterneck for discussions and suggestions throughout the development and execution of the project; Naomi Taylor and Serguei Kozlov for input with the analysis of the mouse models; Tamara Morgan and Donna Butcher of the Molecular Histopathology Laboratory, Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research, for the support with animal analysis; and Eileen Southon for critical reading of the manuscript. This work was supported by the Cancer Moonshot Program and the Intramural Research Program of the NCI, NIH. The contributions of the NIH authors were made as part of their official duties as NIH federal employees, are in compliance with agency policy requirements, and are considered Works of the United States Government. However, the findings and conclusions presented in this paper are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the NIH or the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.
Footnotes
Note: Supplementary data for this article are available at Cancer Research Communications Online (https://aacrjournals.org/cancerrescommun/).
Contributor Information
John W. Glod, Email: john.glod@nih.gov.
Lino Tessarollo, Email: lino.tessarollo@nih.gov.
Data Availability
The data generated in this study are available upon request from the corresponding author.
Authors’ Disclosures
D. Saur reports grants from German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, and Deutsche Krebshilfe during the conduct of the study, as well as grants from German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Joint Funding, outside the submitted work. J.W. Glod reports other support from US WorldMeds and Inhibrx outside the submitted work. No disclosures were reported by the other authors.
Authors’ Contributions
F. Tomassoni-Ardori: Conceptualization, data curation, formal analysis, validation, investigation, methodology, writing–original draft, project administration, writing–review and editing. K.M. Reilly: Conceptualization, resources, funding acquisition. C. Barrick: Investigation. R. Koogle: Investigation. E.F. Edmondson: Data curation, formal analysis. S. Yanpallewar: Investigation. D. Saur: Resources. B.C. Widemann: Conceptualization, funding acquisition. J.W. Glod: Conceptualization, data curation, formal analysis, validation, writing–review and editing. L. Tessarollo: Conceptualization, resources, data curation, supervision, funding acquisition, validation, methodology, writing–original draft, project administration, writing–review and editing.
References
- 1. Klein S, Seidler B, Kettenberger A, Sibaev A, Rohn M, Feil R, et al. Interstitial cells of Cajal integrate excitatory and inhibitory neurotransmission with intestinal slow-wave activity. Nat Commun 2013;4:1630. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Komuro T, Tokui K, Zhou DS. Identification of the interstitial cells of Cajal. Histol Histopathol 1996;11:769–86. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Min KW, Leabu M. Interstitial cells of Cajal (ICC) and gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST): facts, speculations, and myths. J Cell Mol Med 2006;10:995–1013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Robinson TL, Sircar K, Hewlett BR, Chorneyko K, Riddell RH, Huizinga JD. Gastrointestinal stromal tumors may originate from a subset of CD34-positive interstitial cells of Cajal. Am J Pathol 2000;156:1157–63. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Wu C-E, Tzen C-Y, Wang S-Y, Yeh C-N. Clinical diagnosis of gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST): from the molecular genetic point of view. Cancers (Basel) 2019;11:679. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Ibrahim A, Montgomery EA. Gastrointestinal stromal tumors: variants and some pitfalls that they create. Adv Anat Pathol 2024;31:354–63. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Swalchick W, Shamekh R, Bui MM. Is DOG1 immunoreactivity specific to gastrointestinal stromal tumor? Cancer Control 2015;22:498–504. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Heinrich MC, Corless CL, Duensing A, McGreevey L, Chen C-J, Joseph N, et al. PDGFRA activating mutations in gastrointestinal stromal tumors. Science 2003;299:708–10. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Hirota S, Isozaki K, Moriyama Y, Hashimoto K, Nishida T, Ishiguro S, et al. Gain-of-function mutations of c-kit in human gastrointestinal stromal tumors. Science 1998;279:577–80. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Miettinen M, Lasota J. Gastrointestinal stromal tumors: pathology and prognosis at different sites. Semin Diagn Pathol 2006;23:70–83. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Heinrich MC, Jones RL, George S, Gelderblom H, Schöffski P, von Mehren M, et al. Ripretinib versus sunitinib in gastrointestinal stromal tumor: ctDNA biomarker analysis of the phase 3 INTRIGUE trial. Nat Med 2024;30:498–506. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Joensuu H. Adjuvant therapy for high-risk gastrointestinal stromal tumour: considerations for optimal management. Drugs 2012;72:1953–63. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Joensuu H, Hohenberger P, Corless CL. Gastrointestinal stromal tumour. Lancet 2013;382:973–83. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Khosroyani HM, Klug LR, Heinrich MC. TKI treatment sequencing in advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumors. Drugs 2023;83:55–73. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Boikos SA, Pappo AS, Killian JK, LaQuaglia MP, Weldon CB, George S, et al. Molecular subtypes of KIT/PDGFRA wild-type gastrointestinal stromal tumors: a report from the National Institutes of Health gastrointestinal stromal tumor clinic. JAMA Oncol 2016;2:922–8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Cicala CM, Matito J, Quindos M, Gómez-Peregrina D, Romero-Lozano P, Fernandez-Suarez P, et al. Targeted next-generation sequencing in succinate dehydrogenase-deficient GI stromal tumor Identifies actionable alterations in the PI3K/mTOR pathway. JCO Precis Oncol 2025;9:e2400497. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Denu RA, Joseph CP, Urquiola ES, Byrd PS, Yang RK, Ratan R, et al. Utility of clinical next generation sequencing tests in KIT/PDGFRA/SDH wild-type gastrointestinal stromal tumors. Cancers (Basel) 2024;16:1707. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Wada R, Arai H, Kure S, Peng WX, Naito Z. “Wild type” GIST: clinicopathological features and clinical practice. Pathol Int 2016;66:431–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Burgoyne AM, De Siena M, Alkhuziem M, Tang C-M, Medina B, Fanta PT, et al. Duodenal-jejunal flexure GI stromal tumor frequently heralds somatic NF1 and Notch pathway mutations. JCO Precis Oncol 2017;1:1–12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Falchook GS, Trent JC, Heinrich MC, Beadling C, Patterson J, Bastida CC, et al. BRAF mutant gastrointestinal stromal tumor: first report of regression with BRAF inhibitor dabrafenib (GSK2118436) and whole exomic sequencing for analysis of acquired resistance. Oncotarget 2013;4:310–5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21. Gowda S, Sandow L, Heinrich MC. Treatment of BRAF V600E mutant gastrointestinal stromal tumor with dabrafenib: a case report. J Gastrointest Oncol 2024;15:788–93. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22. Hechtman JF, Zehir A, Mitchell T, Borsu L, Singer S, Tap W, et al. Novel oncogene and tumor suppressor mutations in KIT and PDGFRA wild type gastrointestinal stromal tumors revealed by next generation sequencing. Genes Chromosomes Cancer 2015;54:177–84. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23. Huss S, Pasternack H, Ihle MA, Merkelbach-Bruse S, Heitkötter B, Hartmann W, et al. Clinicopathological and molecular features of a large cohort of gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) and review of the literature: BRAF mutations in KIT/PDGFRA wild-type GISTs are rare events. Hum Pathol 2017;62:206–14. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24. Miettinen M, Fetsch JF, Sobin LH, Lasota J. Gastrointestinal stromal tumors in patients with neurofibromatosis 1: a clinicopathologic and molecular genetic study of 45 cases. Am J Surg Pathol 2006;30:90–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25. Mullen D, Vajpeyi R, Capo-Chichi J-M, Nowak K, Wong N, Chetty R. Gastrointestinal stromal tumours (GISTs) with KRAS mutation: a rare but important subset of GISTs. Case Rep Gastrointest Med 2023;2023:4248128. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26. Blay JY, Kang YK, Nishida T, von Mehren M. Gastrointestinal stromal tumours. Nat Rev Dis Primers 2021;7:22. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27. Dong G, Han P, Zhang Z, Ge Q, Jiang J, Li S, et al. Case Report: dramatic response to entritinib in a patient with gastrointestinal stromal tumor positive for NTRK3 fusion. Front Oncol 2025;15:1588950. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28. Shi E, Chmielecki J, Tang C-M, Wang K, Heinrich MC, Kang G, et al. FGFR1 and NTRK3 actionable alterations in “Wild-Type” gastrointestinal stromal tumors. J Transl Med 2016;14:339. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29. Ran L, Murphy D, Sher J, Cao Z, Wang S, Walczak E, et al. ETV1-positive cells give rise to BRAFV600E -mutant gastrointestinal stromal tumors. Cancer Res 2017;77:3758–65. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30. Kondo J, Huh WJ, Franklin JL, Heinrich MC, Rubin BP, Coffey RJ. A smooth muscle-derived, Braf-driven mouse model of gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST): evidence for an alternative GIST cell-of-origin. J Pathol 2020;252:441–50. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31. Huizinga JD, White EJ. Progenitor cells of interstitial cells of Cajal: on the road to tissue repair. Gastroenterology 2008;134:1252–4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32. Huizinga JD, Thuneberg L, Klüppel M, Malysz J, Mikkelsen HB, Bernstein A. W/kit gene required for interstitial cells of Cajal and for intestinal pacemaker activity. Nature 1995;373:347–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33. Adamopoulos C, Papavassiliou KA, Poulikakos PI, Papavassiliou AG. RAF and MEK inhibitors in non-small cell lung cancer. Int J Mol Sci 2024;25:4633. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34. Robert C, Karaszewska B, Schachter J, Rutkowski P, Mackiewicz A, Stroiakovski D, et al. Improved overall survival in melanoma with combined dabrafenib and trametinib. N Engl J Med 2015;372:30–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35. Subbiah V, Kreitman RJ, Wainberg ZA, Gazzah A, Lassen U, Stein A, et al. Dabrafenib plus trametinib in BRAFV600E-mutated rare cancers: the phase 2 ROAR trial. Nat Med 2023;29:1103–12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36. Sommer G, Agosti V, Ehlers I, Rossi F, Corbacioglu S, Farkas J, et al. Gastrointestinal stromal tumors in a mouse model by targeted mutation of the Kit receptor tyrosine kinase. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2003;100:6706–11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37. Zhang JQ, Bosbach B, Loo JK, Vitiello GA, Zeng S, Seifert AM, et al. The V654A second-site KIT mutation increases tumor oncogenesis and STAT activation in a mouse model of gastrointestinal stromal tumor. Oncogene 2020;39:7153–65. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38. Chen H, Ordög T, Chen J, Young DL, Bardsley MR, Redelman D, et al. Differential gene expression in functional classes of interstitial cells of Cajal in murine small intestine. Physiol Genomics 2007;31:492–509. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39. Chi P, Chen Y, Zhang L, Guo X, Wongvipat J, Shamu T, et al. ETV1 is a lineage survival factor that cooperates with KIT in gastrointestinal stromal tumours. Nature 2010;467:849–53. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40. Kondo J, Powell AE, Wang Y, Musser MA, Southard-Smith EM, Franklin JL, et al. LRIG1 regulates ontogeny of smooth muscle-derived subsets of interstitial cells of Cajal in mice. Gastroenterology 2015;149:407–19.e8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41. Lorincz A, Redelman D, Horváth VJ, Bardsley MR, Chen H, Ordög T. Progenitors of interstitial cells of Cajal in the postnatal murine stomach. Gastroenterology 2008;134:1083–93. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42. González-Cámpora R, Delgado MD, Amate AH, Gallardo SP, León MS, Beltrán AL. Old and new immunohistochemical markers for the diagnosis of gastrointestinal stromal tumors. Anal Quant Cytol Histol 2011;33:1–11. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43. Miettinen M, Sobin LH, Sarlomo-Rikala M. Immunohistochemical spectrum of GISTs at different sites and their differential diagnosis with a reference to CD117 (KIT). Mod Pathol 2000;13:1134–42. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44. Camilleri M, Sanders KM. Gastroparesis. Gastroenterology 2022;162:68–87.e1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Supplementary Figure 1. Expression of Dog1 and c-kit in developing mouse GIST lesions.
Supplementary Table 1. Summary of the mouse data from the experiments using tamoxifen at the concentration of 75 and 7.5 mg/kg and the BRAF inhibitor 'Dabrafenib'.
Data Availability Statement
The data generated in this study are available upon request from the corresponding author.






