Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Biophysical Journal logoLink to Biophysical Journal
. 2001 Mar;80(3):1174–1185. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(01)76094-8

Irreversibility in unbranched pathways: preferred positions based on regulatory considerations.

R Alves 1, M A Savageau 1
PMCID: PMC1301313  PMID: 11222282

Abstract

It has been observed experimentally that most unbranched biosynthetic pathways have irreversible reactions near their beginning, many times at the first step. If there were no functional reasons for this fact, then one would expect irreversible reactions to be equally distributed among all positions in such pathways. Since this is not the case, we have attempted to identify functional consequences of having an irreversible reaction early in the pathway. We systematically varied the position of the irreversible reaction in model pathways and compared the resulting systemic behavior according to several criteria for functional effectiveness, using the method of mathematically controlled comparisons. This technique minimizes extraneous differences in systemic behavior and identifies those that are fundamental. Our results show that a pathway with an irreversible reaction located at the first step, and with all other reactions reversible, is on average better than an otherwise equivalent pathway with all reactions reversible, which in turn is on average better than an otherwise equivalent pathway with an irreversible reaction located at any step other than the first. Pathways with an irreversible first reaction and low concentrations of intermediates (one of the primary criteria for functional effectiveness) exhibit the following profile when compared to fully reversible pathways: changes in the concentration of intermediates in response to changes in the level of initial substrate are equally low, the robustness of the intermediate concentrations and of the flux is similar, the margins of stability are similar, flux is more responsive to changes in demand for end product, intermediate concentrations are less responsive to changes in demand for end product, and transient times are shorter. These results provide a functional rationale for the positioning of irreversible reactions at the beginning of unbranched biosynthetic pathways.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (112.0 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Albery W. J., Knowles J. R. Evolution of enzyme function and the development of catalytic efficiency. Biochemistry. 1976 Dec 14;15(25):5631–5640. doi: 10.1021/bi00670a032. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Alves R., Savageau M. A. Comparing systemic properties of ensembles of biological networks by graphical and statistical methods. Bioinformatics. 2000 Jun;16(6):527–533. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/16.6.527. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Alves R., Savageau M. A. Extending the method of mathematically controlled comparison to include numerical comparisons. Bioinformatics. 2000 Sep;16(9):786–798. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/16.9.786. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Alves R., Savageau M. A. Systemic properties of ensembles of metabolic networks: application of graphical and statistical methods to simple unbranched pathways. Bioinformatics. 2000 Jun;16(6):534–547. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/16.6.534. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Bish D. R., Mavrovouniotis M. L. Enzymatic reaction rate limits with constraints on equilibrium constants and experimental parameters. Biosystems. 1998 Jun-Jul;47(1-2):37–60. doi: 10.1016/s0303-2647(98)00012-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Cornish-Bowden A. The effect of natural selection on enzymic catalysis. J Mol Biol. 1976 Feb 15;101(1):1–9. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(76)90062-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Crowley P. H. Natural selection and the Michaelis constant. J Theor Biol. 1975 Apr;50(2):461–475. doi: 10.1016/0022-5193(75)90093-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Fersht A. R. Catalysis, binding and enzyme-substrate complementarity. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1974 Nov 19;187(1089):397–407. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1974.0084. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Heinrich R., Hoffmann E. Kinetic parameters of enzymatic reactions in states of maximal activity; an evolutionary approach. J Theor Biol. 1991 Jul 21;151(2):249–283. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5193(05)80363-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Heinrich R., Klipp E. Control analysis of unbranched enzymatic chains in states of maximal activity. J Theor Biol. 1996 Oct 7;182(3):243–252. doi: 10.1006/jtbi.1996.0161. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Heinrich R., Schuster S. The modelling of metabolic systems. Structure, control and optimality. Biosystems. 1998 Jun-Jul;47(1-2):61–77. doi: 10.1016/s0303-2647(98)00013-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Hlavacek W. S., Savageau M. A. Completely uncoupled and perfectly coupled gene expression in repressible systems. J Mol Biol. 1997 Feb 28;266(3):538–558. doi: 10.1006/jmbi.1996.0811. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Irvine D. H., Savageau M. A. Network regulation of the immune response: alternative control points for suppressor modulation of effector lymphocytes. J Immunol. 1985 Apr;134(4):2100–2116. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Klipp E., Heinrich R. Evolutionary optimization of enzyme kinetic parameters; effect of constraints. J Theor Biol. 1994 Dec 7;171(3):309–323. doi: 10.1006/jtbi.1994.1234. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. MONOD J., CHANGEUX J. P., JACOB F. Allosteric proteins and cellular control systems. J Mol Biol. 1963 Apr;6:306–329. doi: 10.1016/s0022-2836(63)80091-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. PARDEE A. B., YATES R. A. Control of pyrimidine biosynthesis in Escherichia coli by a feed-back mechanism. J Biol Chem. 1956 Aug;221(2):757–770. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Pettersson G. A new approach for determination of the selectively favoured kinetic design of enzyme reactions. J Theor Biol. 1996 Nov 21;183(2):179–183. doi: 10.1006/jtbi.1996.0211. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Pettersson G. Evolutionary optimization of the catalytic efficiency of enzymes. Eur J Biochem. 1992 May 15;206(1):289–295. doi: 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1992.tb16927.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Savageau M. A. Biochemical systems analysis. II. The steady-state solutions for an n-pool system using a power-law approximation. J Theor Biol. 1969 Dec;25(3):370–379. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5193(69)80027-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Savageau M. A. Concepts relating the behavior of biochemical systems to their underlying molecular properties. Arch Biochem Biophys. 1971 Aug;145(2):612–621. doi: 10.1016/s0003-9861(71)80021-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Savageau M. A., Jacknow G. Feedfoward inhibition in biosynthetic pathways: inhibition of the aminoacyl-tRNA synthetase by intermediates of the pathway. J Theor Biol. 1979 Apr 21;77(4):405–425. doi: 10.1016/0022-5193(79)90017-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Savageau M. A. Optimal design of feedback control by inhibition. J Mol Evol. 1974 Nov 29;4(2):139–156. doi: 10.1007/BF01732019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Savageau M. A. Optimal design of feedback control by inhibition: dynamic considerations. J Mol Evol. 1975 Aug 5;5(3):199–222. doi: 10.1007/BF01741242. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Savageau M. A. Parameter sensitivity as a criterion for evaluating and comparing the performance of biochemical systems. Nature. 1971 Feb 19;229(5286):542–544. doi: 10.1038/229542a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Schuster S., Heinrich R. Time hierarchy in enzymatic reaction chains resulting from optimality principles. J Theor Biol. 1987 Nov 21;129(2):189–209. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5193(87)80012-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Shiraishi F., Savageau M. A. The tricarboxylic acid cycle in Dictyostelium discoideum. II. Evaluation of model consistency and robustness. J Biol Chem. 1992 Nov 15;267(32):22919–22925. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Sorribas A., Savageau M. A. Strategies for representing metabolic pathways within biochemical systems theory: reversible pathways. Math Biosci. 1989 Jun;94(2):239–269. doi: 10.1016/0025-5564(89)90066-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Srere P. A. Complexes of sequential metabolic enzymes. Annu Rev Biochem. 1987;56:89–124. doi: 10.1146/annurev.bi.56.070187.000513. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. UMBARGER H. E. Evidence for a negative-feedback mechanism in the biosynthesis of isoleucine. Science. 1956 May 11;123(3202):848–848. doi: 10.1126/science.123.3202.848. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Waley S. G. A note on the kinetics of multi-enzyme systems. Biochem J. 1964 Jun;91(3):514–517. doi: 10.1042/bj0910514. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Biophysical Journal are provided here courtesy of The Biophysical Society

RESOURCES