Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Biophysical Journal logoLink to Biophysical Journal
. 2001 Mar;80(3):1524–1537. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(01)76125-5

Meanfield approach to the thermodynamics of protein-solvent systems with application to p53.

A R Völkel 1, J Noolandi 1
PMCID: PMC1301344  PMID: 11222313

Abstract

We present a meanfield theoretical approach for studying protein-solvent interactions. Starting with the partition function of the system, we develop a field theory by introducing densities for the different components of the system. At this point, protein-solvent interactions are introduced following the inhomogeneous Flory-Huggins model for polymers. Finally, we calculate the free energy in a meanfield approximation. We apply this method to study the stability of the tetramerization domain of the tumor suppressor protein p53 when subjected to site-directed mutagenesis. The four chains of this protein are held together by hydrophobic interactions, and some mutations can weaken this bond while preserving the secondary structure of the single protein chains. We find good qualitative agreement between our numerical results and experimental data, thus encouraging the use of this method as a guide in designing experiments.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (389.7 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Chou P. Y., Fasman G. D. Prediction of protein conformation. Biochemistry. 1974 Jan 15;13(2):222–245. doi: 10.1021/bi00699a002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Clore G. M., Ernst J., Clubb R., Omichinski J. G., Kennedy W. M., Sakaguchi K., Appella E., Gronenborn A. M. Refined solution structure of the oligomerization domain of the tumour suppressor p53. Nat Struct Biol. 1995 Apr;2(4):321–333. doi: 10.1038/nsb0495-321. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Clore G. M., Omichinski J. G., Sakaguchi K., Zambrano N., Sakamoto H., Appella E., Gronenborn A. M. High-resolution structure of the oligomerization domain of p53 by multidimensional NMR. Science. 1994 Jul 15;265(5170):386–391. doi: 10.1126/science.8023159. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Clore G. M., Omichinski J. G., Sakaguchi K., Zambrano N., Sakamoto H., Appella E., Gronenborn A. M. Interhelical angles in the solution structure of the oligomerization domain of p53: correction. Science. 1995 Mar 10;267(5203):1515–1516. doi: 10.1126/science.7878474. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Daggett V., Levitt M. Realistic simulations of native-protein dynamics in solution and beyond. Annu Rev Biophys Biomol Struct. 1993;22:353–380. doi: 10.1146/annurev.bb.22.060193.002033. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Dunbrack R. L., Jr, Karplus M. Backbone-dependent rotamer library for proteins. Application to side-chain prediction. J Mol Biol. 1993 Mar 20;230(2):543–574. doi: 10.1006/jmbi.1993.1170. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Eisenberg D., McLachlan A. D. Solvation energy in protein folding and binding. Nature. 1986 Jan 16;319(6050):199–203. doi: 10.1038/319199a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Friend S. p53: a glimpse at the puppet behind the shadow play. Science. 1994 Jul 15;265(5170):334–335. doi: 10.1126/science.8023155. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Godzik A., Koliński A., Skolnick J. Are proteins ideal mixtures of amino acids? Analysis of energy parameter sets. Protein Sci. 1995 Oct;4(10):2107–2117. doi: 10.1002/pro.5560041016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Hinds D. A., Levitt M. Exploring conformational space with a simple lattice model for protein structure. J Mol Biol. 1994 Nov 4;243(4):668–682. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(94)90040-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Jeffrey P. D., Gorina S., Pavletich N. P. Crystal structure of the tetramerization domain of the p53 tumor suppressor at 1.7 angstroms. Science. 1995 Mar 10;267(5203):1498–1502. doi: 10.1126/science.7878469. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Karplus M., Sali A. Theoretical studies of protein folding and unfolding. Curr Opin Struct Biol. 1995 Feb;5(1):58–73. doi: 10.1016/0959-440x(95)80010-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Karplus M., Weaver D. L. Protein folding dynamics: the diffusion-collision model and experimental data. Protein Sci. 1994 Apr;3(4):650–668. doi: 10.1002/pro.5560030413. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Koehl P., Delarue M. A self consistent mean field approach to simultaneous gap closure and side-chain positioning in homology modelling. Nat Struct Biol. 1995 Feb;2(2):163–170. doi: 10.1038/nsb0295-163. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Koehl P., Delarue M. Application of a self-consistent mean field theory to predict protein side-chains conformation and estimate their conformational entropy. J Mol Biol. 1994 Jun 3;239(2):249–275. doi: 10.1006/jmbi.1994.1366. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Koehl P., Delarue M. Mean-field minimization methods for biological macromolecules. Curr Opin Struct Biol. 1996 Apr;6(2):222–226. doi: 10.1016/s0959-440x(96)80078-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Lee B., Richards F. M. The interpretation of protein structures: estimation of static accessibility. J Mol Biol. 1971 Feb 14;55(3):379–400. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(71)90324-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Lee C., Levitt M. Accurate prediction of the stability and activity effects of site-directed mutagenesis on a protein core. Nature. 1991 Aug 1;352(6334):448–451. doi: 10.1038/352448a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Lee C. Predicting protein mutant energetics by self-consistent ensemble optimization. J Mol Biol. 1994 Feb 25;236(3):918–939. doi: 10.1006/jmbi.1994.1198. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Lee W., Harvey T. S., Yin Y., Yau P., Litchfield D., Arrowsmith C. H. Solution structure of the tetrameric minimum transforming domain of p53. Nat Struct Biol. 1994 Dec;1(12):877–890. doi: 10.1038/nsb1294-877. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Levitt M. Through the breach. Curr Opin Struct Biol. 1996 Apr 1;6(2):193–194. doi: 10.1016/s0959-440x(96)80074-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Lim W. A., Sauer R. T. The role of internal packing interactions in determining the structure and stability of a protein. J Mol Biol. 1991 May 20;219(2):359–376. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(91)90570-v. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Noolandi J., Davison T. S., Volkel A. R., Nie X., Kay C., Arrowsmith C. H. A meanfield approach to the thermodynamics of a protein-solvent system with application to the oligomerization of the tumor suppressor p53. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2000 Aug 29;97(18):9955–9960. doi: 10.1073/pnas.160075697. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Ponder J. W., Richards F. M. Tertiary templates for proteins. Use of packing criteria in the enumeration of allowed sequences for different structural classes. J Mol Biol. 1987 Feb 20;193(4):775–791. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(87)90358-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Shakhnovich E, Farztdinov G, Gutin AM, Karplus M. Protein folding bottlenecks: A lattice Monte Carlo simulation. Phys Rev Lett. 1991 Sep 16;67(12):1665–1668. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.67.1665. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Srinivasan R., Rose G. D. LINUS: a hierarchic procedure to predict the fold of a protein. Proteins. 1995 Jun;22(2):81–99. doi: 10.1002/prot.340220202. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Tuffery P., Etchebest C., Hazout S., Lavery R. A new approach to the rapid determination of protein side chain conformations. J Biomol Struct Dyn. 1991 Jun;8(6):1267–1289. doi: 10.1080/07391102.1991.10507882. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Vieth M., Kolinski A., Brooks C. L., 3rd, Skolnick J. Prediction of the folding pathways and structure of the GCN4 leucine zipper. J Mol Biol. 1994 Apr 8;237(4):361–367. doi: 10.1006/jmbi.1994.1239. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Vásquez M. Modeling side-chain conformation. Curr Opin Struct Biol. 1996 Apr;6(2):217–221. doi: 10.1016/s0959-440x(96)80077-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Biophysical Journal are provided here courtesy of The Biophysical Society

RESOURCES