Skip to main content
JACS Au logoLink to JACS Au
. 2026 Mar 12;6(3):2068–2075. doi: 10.1021/jacsau.6c00154

Dual Stabilization of S‑Adenosylmethionine for Enzymatic DNA Labeling

Jonas Bucevičius 1,*, Ru̅ta Gerasimaitė 1, Gražvydas Lukinavičius 1,*
PMCID: PMC13014185  PMID: 41889762

Abstract

S-Adenosyl-l-methionine (AdoMet) analogues are a powerful tool for site-specific biomolecular labeling via methyltransferase (MTase)-catalyzed transfer reactions. However, their utility is often limited by their poor chemical stability under enzymatic reaction conditions. Here, we report a new class of stabilized AdoMet analogues, featuring a conformationally constrained proline side chain in place of homoalanine. This substitution inhibits intramolecular cyclization, which is a major decomposition pathway. Combination with selenonium modification, which suppresses depurination, yields analogues with up to a 90-fold increase in half-life relative to AdoMet. These cofactors retain activity with DNA MTases and allow sequence-specific labeling of plasmid DNA using both two- and single-step approaches with fluorescent dyes.

Keywords: S-Adenosylmethionine, cofactor engineering, proline derivatives, methyltransferases, DNA labeling


graphic file with name au6c00154_0007.jpg


graphic file with name au6c00154_0005.jpg

Introduction

S-Adenosyl-l-methionine (AdoMet) is one of the most ubiquitous cofactors present in all living organisms, playing a central role in a wide array of biochemical reactions and intracellular regulatory pathways. Methyltransferases (MTases) catalyze SN2-like reactions between nucleophiles in biomolecules and the electrophilic carbon next to the sulfonium center of AdoMet. Transfer of larger substituents from AdoMet analogues is usually hampered; however, the reaction efficiency can be restored by using synthetic analogues bearing sp- or sp2-hybridized carbon at the β-position to the sulfonium center, − which stabilizes the intermediate state and increases the transfer rate through a secondary orbital overlap effect. The transfer of larger groups from synthetic AdoMet-analogues by native or engineered MTases is exploited in late-stage modification of complex organic molecules, , biomolecule enrichment, , labeling, sequencing, ,, and optical genome mapping. However, the AdoMet and especially its activated analogues are chemically unstable under enzymatic reaction conditions. They decay mainly via two main pathways: intramolecular cyclization, leading to the formation of homoserine lactone and 5′-deoxy-5′-(alkylthio)­adenosine or its derivatives, and depurination, resulting in adenine base and homocysteine sulfonium ribose derivatives (Figure ).

1.

1

Major decomposition pathways of homoalanine (A) and proline (B) cofactors. Decomposition at physiological pH of AdoMet and its analogues can proceed via multiple pathways depending on the structure of the transferable side chain (R) and chalcogenonium center (X). Dominating decay products allow the estimation of each pathway rate: k Nuc, intramolecular nucleophilic cyclization; k Dep, depurination; and k Hyd, hydrolysis. Replacement of homoalanine with proline introduces steric hindrance and effectively eliminates intramolecular cyclization.

Since the first examples of methyltransferase-directed transfer of activated groups (mTAG), − there have been only a few reports of chemically more stable designs of AdoMet analogues. However, the enzymatic activity was either lost or maintained only with promiscuous small-molecule transferases, such as DnrK, COMT, PNMT, and NNMT, and none of them maintained activity with DNA MTases. ,, Herein, we report an AdoMet analogue design, wherein the homoalanine side chain is replaced with a conformationally rigid proline side chain, eliminating the intramolecular cyclization decay pathway. When combined with sulfur-to-selenium substitution, which reduces depurination at higher pH, the modified cofactors display up to 90-fold enhanced stability under enzymatic reaction conditions. We demonstrate that these cofactor analogues maintain enzymatic activities with the widely used thermophilic adenine DNA MTase TaqI and an engineered cytosine DNA MTase HhaI.

Results and Discussion

Design, Synthesis, and Initial Enzymatic Activity Testing

We hypothesized that replacing the homoalanine side chain with a proline residue would inhibit the intramolecular cyclization pathway by restricting access to a favorable reactive conformation. Proline contributes an intrinsic stereocenter at the α-carbon (Cα), giving rise to l and d configurations, while the chalcogenonium center constitutes a second stereogenic element, affording R and S diastereomers. In addition, the relative cis/trans arrangement between the proline carboxyl group and the thioadenosine backbone further defines the overall three-dimensional architecture. All combinations of these stereochemical elements were prepared (Scheme and Figures S1–S4) and evaluated for activity with the DNA methyltransferases TaqI and the engineered HhaI Q82A/Y254S/N304A variant, engineered to work efficiently with activated AdoMet analogues. The synthesis commenced from enantiomerically pure N-Boc-4-hydroxyproline methyl esters (Scheme ). The hydroxy group was converted to a mesylate, followed by SN2-type nucleophilic substitution with either potassium thioacetate (KSAc) or potassium selenocyanate (KSeCN), affording intermediates 5–9. Subsequent generation of the corresponding thiolate or selenolate anions enabled nucleophilic substitution of either 5′-tosyladenosine or 5′-chloro-7-deazaadenosine to yield compounds 10–15. After ester hydrolysis and Boc deprotection, the resulting compounds 16–21 were alkylated by using mesylates (SI-1–SI-3) or triflates (SI-4 and SI-5) to furnish diastereomeric mixtures of final cofactors 22–36. The obtained diastereomeric mixtures were separated by preparative reversed-phase HPLC (Figure S5). In the case of cofactors with methyl transferable groups (28ab–30ab), we were unable to separate diastereomers; therefore, these compounds were tested and used as two diastereomer mixtures. In all other cases, separations were successful.

1. Synthesis Scheme of Proline Cofactors 22–36 .

1

a All possible stereoisomers of the proline-derived cofactors are shown, including the α-carbon (Cα) isomers (l/d configuration), both S and R diastereomers and cis/trans arrangement of the proline ring with respect to the cofactor backbone. The synthesis was initiated from enantiomerically pure N-Boc-4-hydroxyproline. Only the R diastereomers with cis-l and cis-d configurations are enzymatically active, whereas trans isomers and S diastereomers are inactive.

The activity of the new AdoMet analogues in DNA MTase-catalyzed reactions was evaluated using a DNA protection assay, which relies on the inability of restriction enzymes to cleave DNA-containing modified bases within their recognition sequences (Figure S6). Cofactors 22a–25a and 22b–25b, bearing a transferable hex-2-ynyl side chain (Scheme ), were tested with the thermophilic DNA adenine-N6 methyltransferase TaqI. Among these, only the cis-l-proline and cis-d-proline configuration analogues (22b and 24b) exhibited enzymatic activity (Scheme and Figure S7). By analogy with the active stereoisomer of AdoMet, the sulfonium or selenonium center in these cofactors is presumed to adopt the R configuration. We further assume that all other cofactors exhibiting longer retention times (26b, 27b, 31–36b) during preparative HPLC purification have the same R configuration. The cis-l-proline analogue 22b was also active with the M.HhaI Q82A/Y254S/N304A variant (Figure S8). On this basis, all subsequent analogues were designed around the cis-l-proline scaffold as a more promising variant.

For comparative analysis, sulfonium- and selenonium-based cofactors (37b–40b), bearing the canonical homoalanine side chain and a series of transferable groups (methyl, propargyl, and hex-2-ynyl), were prepared (Figure A). The synthesis involved alkylation of S-adenosylhomocysteine or Se-adenosylhomocysteine with the corresponding alkyl mesylates or methyl triflate (Figure S9), followed by preparative HPLC purification.

2.

2

Stability and activity of homoalanine and proline cofactors. (A) General structures of the homoalanine and proline cofactors. Degradation kinetics of AdoMet or its analogues containing transferable methyl (B) or hex-2-ynyl groups (C) in 50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.0) at 37 °C and N = 3. l-Abu, l-homoalanine; cis-l-Pro, cis-l-proline. (D) Apparent turnover numbers of M.TaqI with homoalanine (green bars) and proline (blue bars) cofactors measured via DNA protection assay in 50 mM Tris-MOPS (pH 8.0) at 65 °C and N ≥ 3.

For single-step labeling of DNA with fluorescent dyes, we synthesized cis-l-proline cofactors 41–43 by conjugating terminal alkyne-bearing intermediates 34b–36b with 4-MeSiR-PEG4-N3 via the CuAAC reaction, introducing a fluorescent reporter directly into the transferable moiety in 30–67% yields. For comparison, a classical homoalanine-based cofactor analogue 44 was prepared similarly from AdoHcyN3 and 4-MeSiR-PEG4-alkyne (Figure S10).

Stability, Degradation, and Kinetics

The chemical stability and decomposition products of the prepared cofactors were evaluated in a 50 mM Tris–HCl buffer (pH 8.0) at 37 °C (Figure ). Time-dependent decomposition analysis revealed behavior consistent with first-order decay kinetics, indicative of (pseudo)­unimolecular decomposition processes (Figures and S11–S15 and Table ). AdoMet exhibited a half-life of 366 min (Figure B), with equal contributions from intramolecular cyclization and depurination pathways (Table and Figure S16). Substitution of the sulfonium center with selenonium (SeAdoMet 39ab) suppressed the depurination pathway (Figure S16) but accelerated intramolecular cyclization due to the higher nucleofugality of diselenyl ethers, resulting in a reduced half-life of 133 min. We noticed that the decomposition product, methylselenoadenosine, was partially oxidized to methylselenoxideadenosine under analytical conditions, and this oxidation was taken into account in the half-life and degradation reaction rate calculations. Importantly, the selenium incorporation completely suppressed depurination, as the formation of a selenium ylide intermediate requires higher than physiological pH values. ,

1. Half-Lives and Decay Rate Constants of the Studied Cofactors .

cofactor amino acid chain X Z –R t 1/2 (min) [95% CI] k total (×10– 5 s–1) k Nuc (×10– 5 s–1) k Dep (×10– 5 s–1) k Hyd (×10– 5 s–1)
AdoMet l-Abu S N –CH3 366 [359, 372] 3.09 ± 0.07 1.30 ± 0.05 1.34 ± 0.06  
SeAdoMet (39ab) l-Abu Se N –CH3 133 [127, 139] 8 ± 2 8 ± 2    
cofactor 28ab cis-l-Pro S N –CH3 346 [345, 348] 3.42 ± 0.03   3.35 ± 0.05  
cofactor 30ab cis-l-Pro Se N –CH3 34,012 [33378, 34664] 0.034 ± 0.003     0.027 ± 0.002
cofactor 31b cis-l-Pro Se N –(CH2)5CH3 73,968 [71017, 77151] 0.015 ± 0.003     0.012 ± 0.004
cofactor 37b l-Abu S N –CH2CC(CH2)2CH3 72 [70, 73] 17.1 ± 0.5 5.5 ± 0.2 2.72 ± 0.09  
cofactor 38b l-Abu Se N –CH2CC(CH2)2CH3 19 [18, 19] 64 ± 3 52 ± 2    
cofactor 22b cis-l-Pro S N –CH2CC(CH2)2CH3 110 [108, 111] 11.4 ± 0.4   7.5 ± 0.3 0.059 ± 0.001
cofactor 27b cis-l-Pro Se N –CH2CC(CH2)2CH3 888 [885, 891] 1.30 ± 0.02     0.79 ± 0.01
cofactor 33b cis-l-Pro Se N –CH2CCH 45 [44, 46] 26.8 ± 0.7      
cofactor 35b cis-l-Pro Se N –CH2CC(CH2)3CCH 925 [907, 944] 1.27 ± 0.05     0.58 ± 0.02
a

l-Abu, l-homoalanine; cis-l-Pro, cis-l-proline.

b

95% confidence interval is reported in square brackets.

Replacing the homoalanine side chain with a proline moiety completely inhibited the intramolecular cyclization pathway (Figure S17); however, the depurination rate slightly increased and the analogue 28ab showed a similar half-life (346 min, 5.8 h) to AdoMet. It is known that the use of a purine isostere, such as 7-deazapurine, can suppress depurination at physiological pH values due to limited cascade charge redistribution from the formed ylide to carbon at the 7 position. Indeed, compound 29ab exhibited a markedly extended half-life of ∼17 h, with slow depurination as the dominant degradation pathway (Table S1 and Figure B). Remarkably, the selenium-containing cofactor 30ab displayed complete suppression of both depurination and cyclization (Table and Figures B and S17), leading to a half-life of ∼24 days90-fold greater than that of native AdoMet. Here, the only remaining decomposition route was the slow hydrolysis of the transferable methyl group.

Next, we measured the stabilities of cofactors bearing activated hex-2-ynyl groups. Half-life of homoalanine containing cofactor 37b was 72 min with a major degradation by intramolecular cyclization and minor by depurination (Figures C, S11, and S16). As expected, the corresponding selenonium cofactor 38b exhibited markedly accelerated degradation, proceeding predominantly via an intramolecular cyclization pathway with a half-life of 19 min (Figures C, S11, and S16). The corresponding proline-containing cofactor 22b exhibited only a marginal increase in half-life compared to its homoalanine counterpart cofactor 37b, consistent with their similar depurination rate constants of the order of 10–5 s–1 (Figures S11 and S17, Table ). Incorporation of a 7-deazapurine (cofactor 26b) did not improve stability, likely due to increased lability of the hex-2-ynyl group, resulting in its intramolecular or intermolecular transfer onto proline nitrogen (Table S1, Figures S17, and S18). However, the selenonium-proline cofactor 27b displayed significantly improved stability of ∼14 h, with degradation predominantly occurring through hydrolysis of the transferable group (Figures S17 and S18). This represents a 12-fold increase in half-life compared to the conventional homoalanine-based analogue 37b (72 min).

Both the sulfonium proline cofactor 32b and AdoYn , were highly unstable and rapidly degraded via hydration of the terminal alkyne, with complete decomposition occurring in under 1 min (Table S1). The cofactor 40b (SeAdoYn) is widely used for tagging proteins, DNA, or RNA with a reactive propargyl group for downstream labeling by click chemistry. ,, We determined the half-life of this cofactor to be approximately 15 min due to very fast intramolecular cyclization (Figures S16 and S18). In comparison, the selenonium-proline cofactor 33b exhibited improved stability, with a half-life of ∼45 min (Figures S11 and S17 and Table ) and degraded via water addition to the triple bond, thus significantly slower compared to AdoYn or 32b. Introduction of proline eliminated the intramolecular cyclization pathway but did not change susceptibility to water addition at the triple bond. We propose that selenonium salts possess a substantially higher activation barrier to ylide formation at the propargyl substituent, a process that in sulfonium analogues rapidly triggers rearrangement to a highly reactive allene intermediate that is readily attacked by water.

An alternative strategy to overcome propargyl cofactor instability is to position the terminal alkyne distal to the chalcogenonium center. Thus, we designed cofactor 35b, featuring a transferable n-octadiynyl groupan eight-carbon linker terminating in a terminal alkyne, which can be used via click chemistry for 2-step labeling or pulldown applications. This design retained a half-life of ∼15 h and degradation kinetics similar to those of cofactor 27b, which contains a shorter hex-2-ynyl side chain, and showed no degradation via water addition to the triple bond (Figure S17).

Enzymatic Activity with Methyltransferases TaqI and HhaI Q82A/Y254S/N304A

The efficiency of enzymatic transfer of methyl or triple-bond-activated substituents (R groups) was estimated using a DNA protection assay by varying the molar ratio of DNA methyltransferase to its target sites. Reactions contained a constant amount of λ DNA and 2-fold serial dilutions of M.TaqI, and apparent turnovers were determined based on digestion with R.TaqI, followed by agarose gel electrophoresis (Figures D, S6, and S19). Consistent with previous studies, AdoMet showed 512 h–1 turnovers and served as a benchmark. The analogue cofactor 28ab, bearing a proline side chain, exhibited only 8 h–1. This might be caused by multiple reasons, including decreased affinity of the cofactor due to the loss of contacts with the protein, steric hindrance, and distorted geometry of the transition state due to conformational rigidity of the proline side chain. Remarkably, selenonium analogue 30ab with the same proline side chain reached ∼512 h–1, suggesting that the enhanced electrophilicity of selenium and markedly increased cofactor stability can effectively counteract all mentioned negative effects. The same trend was observed for triple-bond-activated cofactor series: the benchmark homoalanine cofactor (37b) with the hex-2-ynyl transferable group attained ∼10 h–1, while the cis-l/d-proline analogues 22b/24b showed reduced activity (∼4 h–1). The selenonium-proline cofactor 27b exhibited 32 h–1 turnovers, representing a significant improvement over homoalanine cofactor 37b. Importantly, this effect was not limited to short transferable chains but was retained in fluorescent cofactors, where the fluorescent dye is linked via a long hydrophilic PEG4 linker. Here again, selenonium-proline cofactor 42 significantly outperformed sulfonium-proline cofactor 41 and homoalanine cofactor 44. In fact, M.TaqI activity with cofactor 42 approached its activity with AdoMet (Figure D). Longer alkyl carbon chain-substituted cofactors, such as -propyl, without activating π-bonds generally result in minimal (<1 h–1) transfer efficiencies. , Nevertheless, the most stable analogue 31b (half-life ∼ 50 days), bearing a hexyl transferable group, achieved ∼8 h–1 turnovers with M.TaqI, underscoring the increased reactivity of selenonium centers even without sp or sp2 hybridization at the β-position (Figures D and S19).

A similar trend was observed with M.HhaI Q82A/Y254S/N304A and cofactors with a transferable methyl group. The activity of proline cofactor 28ab decreased compared to AdoMet, which was partially rescued using selenonium-proline cofactor 30ab. However, this effect was not retained with longer transferable chains: while cofactor 22b showed low activity, cofactor 27b was completely inactive (Figure S20). This behavior likely results from the stringent geometric requirements for the formation of the intermediate covalent complex in C5-MTases, which cannot simultaneously accommodate the constrained proline side chain and the larger selenium atom.

Next, we confirmed the nature of enzymatic reaction products in the MTase reaction under single-turnover conditions using duplex DNA oligonucleotide bearing a single MTase site and an excess of enzyme and cofactor. The DNA was then hydrolyzed to nucleosides, and LC/MS analysis was used to identify the resulting modifications. Expected identities of modification products by M.TaqI (Figures S21 and S22) and M.HhaI Q82A/Y254S/N304A (Figure S23) were confirmed by mass spectrometry in all the cases. The results corroborate the conclusion that both DNA MTases can use stabilized cis-l-proline sulfonium and selenonium cofactors to modify DNA.

Under single-turnover conditions, M.TaqI reaction efficiency is unlikely to be limited by affinity toward the cofactor. Nonetheless, sulfonium-proline cofactors 22b, 24b, and 41 and selenonium-proline cofactors 31b and 43, which lack activating π bonds, fail to modify both DNA strands. This suggests a challenge in accommodating the conformationally rigid cofactor and the bulky modification of the complementary strand of the DNA target site in a productive orientation within the enzyme active site.

Examination of binary M.TaqI–AdoMet (PDB ID 2ADM) and M.HhaI–AdoMet (PDB ID 2HMY) X-ray structures revealed significant differences in their cofactor binding pockets. The M.TaqI pocket is substantially less sterically constrained than that of M.HhaI, rationalizing its higher tolerance toward analogues (Figure S24 and Videos S1 and S2). Introduction of the Q82A/Y254S/N304A mutations into the M.HhaI active site expands the transferable group cavity while largely preserving interactions with the homoalanine moiety, further supporting the idea that pocket sterics govern cofactor promiscuity (Figure S24).

Two-Step and Direct Labeling of DNA with Fluorescent Dyes

To demonstrate the applicability of proline-based cofactors for DNA labeling, we carried out two- and single-step sequence-specific labeling of pUC19 DNA (Figure ). In the two-step approach, proline cofactor 35b, bearing an n-octadiynyl transferable group, was used. In the first step, the terminal alkyne-containing group was enzymatically transferred to pUC19 DNA by M.TaqI, and complete modification of TCGA sites was confirmed by protection from R.TaqI cleavage (Figure S25). In the second step, the resulting alkyne-tagged DNA was conjugated with Calfluor647-azide under CuAAC conditions. To assess labeling specificity, the modified DNA was digested with R.MbiI and analyzed by agarose gel electrophoresis. Fluorescence imaging in the Cy5 channel revealed selective labeling of the 1801 and 644 bp fragmentseach containing two M.TaqI sites and no labeling on the 240 bp fragment without M.TaqI sites (Figure A).

3.

3

DNA labeling with proline-based AdoMet analogues. Principal scheme of two-step (A) and single-step (B) labeling of pUC19 plasmid (left) and agarose gel electrophoresis demonstrating site-specific DNA labeling after digestion with R.MbiI.

Upon labeling pUC19 DNA with M.TaqI and fluorescent proline cofactors, 41, 42, and 44 afforded complete protection from R.TaqI digestion, confirming successful fluorophore transfer (Figure S26). The specificity of labeling was validated by digestion with R.MbiI and analyzing fluorescent DNA fragments on agarose gel (Figure B). The identity of adenine modifications was confirmed by LC-MS analysis using a duplex oligonucleotide under single-turnover reaction conditions (Figure S27).

Conclusions

We systematically evaluated all stereoisomers of proline-based AdoMet analogues to define the structural determinants of the cofactor activity. Only the cis-l and cis-d configurations were catalytically competent, with cis-l displaying the highest activity, whereas both trans isomers were inactive. Proline substitution suppressed intramolecular cyclization but had a minimal impact on depurination kinetics. Depurination was markedly reduced upon replacement of sulfonium with selenonium, extending cofactor half-lives by up to 90-fold without compromising transfer rates.

The improved cofactor stability significantly enhances the practical utility of methyltransferase-mediated tagging. In particular, efficient labeling is possible under the elevated temperatures required for thermophilic methyltransferases. This design strategy paves the way for more robust biomolecular labeling tools, and we believe it may be extended to other types of AdoMet-dependent enzymatic systems. The modularity of the approach also supports future development of stable and specifically tailored AdoMet analogues for tagging, epigenetic profiling, or other applications in diagnostics.

Supplementary Material

au6c00154_si_001.pdf (15.7MB, pdf)
Download video file (2.1MB, mp4)
Download video file (2MB, mp4)

Acknowledgments

The authors thank the Max Planck Society for supporting this work. The authors are grateful to Dr. Vladimir Belov, Jan Seikowski, Jens Schimpfhauser, and Jürgen Bienert (Facility for Synthetic Chemistry, MPI-NAT) for acquiring NMR spectra. The authors acknowledge Dr. Holm Frauendorf and the central analytics/mass spectrometry team (Institute for Organic and Biomolecular Chemistry, Georg-August University, Göttingen) for recording HRMS spectra. The authors thank Georgij Kostiuk for providing purified M.TaqI. Videos S1 and S2 were generated with UCSF ChimeraX, developed by the Resource for Biocomputing, Visualization, and Informatics at the University of California, San Francisco, with support from National Institutes of Health R01-GM129325 and the Office of Cyber Infrastructure and Computational Biology, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases.

The Supporting Information is available free of charge at https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/jacsau.6c00154.

  • Figures, tables, experimental procedures, NMR spectra, and HPLC chromatograms (PDF)

  • Rotating view of the binary M.TaqI–AdoMet complex (PDB ID 2ADM) highlighting cofactor positioning and binding pocket (MP4)

  • Rotating view of the binary M.HhaI–AdoMet complex (PDB ID 2HMY) illustrating cofactor positioning within the binding pocket (MP4)

All authors performed the experiments, analyzed the obtained data, and prepared the manuscript. CRediT: Jonas Bucevičius conceptualization, methodology, visualization, writing - original draft; Ru̅ta Gerasimaitė methodology, visualization, writing - original draft; Gražvydas Lukinavičius conceptualization, methodology, supervision, visualization, writing - original draft, writing - review & editing.

Open access funded by Max Planck Society.

The authors declare the following competing financial interest(s): patent application no. PCT/EP2025/056156 covering proline cofactor analogs.

References

  1. Lu S. C.. S-Adenosylmethionine. International Journal of Biochemistry & Cell Biology. 2000;32(4):391–395. doi: 10.1016/S1357-2725(99)00139-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Abdelraheem E., Thair B., Varela R. F., Jockmann E., Popadić D., Hailes H. C., Ward J. M., Iribarren A. M., Lewkowicz E. S., Andexer J. N.. et al. Methyltransferases: Functions and Applications. ChemBioChem. 2022;23(18):e202200212. doi: 10.1002/cbic.202200212. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Dalhoff C., Lukinavičius G., Klimas̆auskas S., Weinhold E.. Direct transfer of extended groups from synthetic cofactors by DNA methyltransferases. Nat. Chem. Biol. 2006;2(1):31–32. doi: 10.1038/nchembio754. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Lukinavičius G., Lapienė V., Staševskij Z., Dalhoff C., Weinhold E., Klimašauskas S.. Targeted Labeling of DNA by Methyltransferase-Directed Transfer of Activated Groups (mTAG) J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007;129(10):2758–2759. doi: 10.1021/ja0691876. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Lukinavičius G., Tomkuvienė M., Masevičius V., Klimašauskas S.. Enhanced Chemical Stability of AdoMet Analogues for Improved Methyltransferase-Directed Labeling of DNA. ACS Chem. Biol. 2013;8(6):1134–1139. doi: 10.1021/cb300669x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Cornelissen N. V., Hoffmann A., Ghosh P., Pignot Y. L., Erguven M., Rentmeister A.. Chimeric cofactors enable methyltransferase-catalyzed prenylation. Chem. 2025;11:102538. doi: 10.1016/j.chempr.2025.102538. [DOI] [Google Scholar]; Holstein J. M., Stummer D., Rentmeister A.. Enzymatic modification of 5′-capped RNA with a 4-vinylbenzyl group provides a platform for photoclick and inverse electron-demand Diels–Alder reaction. Chemical Science. 2015;6(2):1362–1369. doi: 10.1039/C4SC03182B. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; DOI:10.1039/C4SC03182B.; Michailidou F., Klöcker N., Cornelissen N. V., Singh R. K., Peters A., Ovcharenko A., Kümmel D., Rentmeister A.. Engineered SAM Synthetases for Enzymatic Generation of AdoMet Analogs with Photocaging Groups and Reversible DNA Modification in Cascade Reactions. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2021;60(1):480–485. doi: 10.1002/anie.202012623. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Law B. J. C., Struck A.-W., Bennett M. R., Wilkinson B., Micklefield J.. Site-specific bioalkylation of rapamycin by the RapM 16-O-methyltransferase. Chemical Science. 2015;6(5):2885–2892. doi: 10.1039/C5SC00164A. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; DOI:10.1039/C5SC00164A.; Stecher H., Tengg M., Ueberbacher B. J., Remler P., Schwab H., Griengl H., Gruber-Khadjawi M.. Biocatalytic Friedel–Crafts Alkylation Using Non-natural Cofactors. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2009;48(50):9546–9548. doi: 10.1002/anie.200905095. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Neti S. S., Wang B., Iwig D. F., Onderko E. L., Booker S. J.. Enzymatic Fluoromethylation Enabled by the S-Adenosylmethionine Analog Te-Adenosyl-L-(fluoromethyl)­homotellurocysteine. ACS Central Science. 2023;9(5):905–914. doi: 10.1021/acscentsci.2c01385. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Kriukienė E., Labrie V., Khare T., Urbanavičiu̅tė G., Lapinaitė A., Koncevičius K., Li D., Wang T., Pai S., Ptak C.. et al. DNA unmethylome profiling by covalent capture of CpG sites. Nat. Commun. 2013;4(1):2190. doi: 10.1038/ncomms3190. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Artyukhin A. B., Woo Y.-H.. DNA extraction method with improved efficiency and specificity using DNA methyltransferase and “click” chemistry. Anal. Biochem. 2012;425(2):169–174. doi: 10.1016/j.ab.2012.03.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; Islam K., Bothwell I., Chen Y., Sengelaub C., Wang R., Deng H., Luo M.. Bioorthogonal Profiling of Protein Methylation Using Azido Derivative of S-Adenosyl-l-methionine. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2012;134(13):5909–5915. doi: 10.1021/ja2118333. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Heck C., Torchinsky D., Nifker G., Gularek F., Michaeli Y., Weinhold E., Ebenstein Y.. Label as you fold: methyltransferase-assisted functionalization of DNA nanostructures. Nanoscale. 2020;12(39):20287–20291. doi: 10.1039/D0NR03694C. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; DOI:10.1039/D0NR03694C.; Goyvaerts V., Van Snick S., D’Huys L., Vitale R., Helmer Lauer M., Wang S., Leen V., Dehaen W., Hofkens J.. Fluorescent SAM analogues for methyltransferase based DNA labeling. Chem. Commun. 2020;56(22):3317–3320. doi: 10.1039/C9CC08938A. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; DOI: 10.1039/C9CC08938A.
  12. Staševskij Z., Gibas P., Gordevičius J., Kriukienė E., Klimašauskas S.. Tethered Oligonucleotide-Primed Sequencing, TOP-Seq: A High-Resolution Economical Approach for DNA Epigenome Profiling. Mol. Cell. 2017;65(3):554–564.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2016.12.012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Mikutis S., Gu M., Sendinc E., Hazemi M. E., Kiely-Collins H., Aspris D., Vassiliou G. S., Shi Y., Tzelepis K., Bernardes G. J. L.. meCLICK-Seq, a Substrate-Hijacking and RNA Degradation Strategy for the Study of RNA Methylation. ACS Central Science. 2020;6(12):2196–2208. doi: 10.1021/acscentsci.0c01094. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Jeffet J., Kobo A., Su T., Grunwald A., Green O., Nilsson A. N., Eisenberg E., Ambjörnsson T., Westerlund F., Weinhold E.. et al. Super-Resolution Genome Mapping in Silicon Nanochannels. ACS Nano. 2016;10(11):9823–9830. doi: 10.1021/acsnano.6b05398. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; Avraham S., Schütz L., Käver L., Dankers A., Margalit S., Michaeli Y., Zirkin S., Torchinsky D., Gilat N., Bahr O.. et al. Chemo-Enzymatic Fluorescence Labeling Of Genomic DNA For Simultaneous Detection Of Global 5-Methylcytosine And 5-Hydroxymethylcytosine. ChemBioChem. 2023;24(20):e202300400. doi: 10.1002/cbic.202300400. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; Gabrieli T., Michaeli Y., Avraham S., Torchinsky D., Margalit S., Schütz L., Juhasz M., Coruh C., Arbib N., Zhou Z. S.. et al. Chemoenzymatic labeling of DNA methylation patterns for single-molecule epigenetic mapping. Nucleic Acids Res. 2022;50(16):e92. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkac460. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Iwig D. F., Booker S. J.. Insight into the Polar Reactivity of the Onium Chalcogen Analogues of S-Adenosyl-l-methionine. Biochemistry. 2004;43(42):13496–13509. doi: 10.1021/bi048693+. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Du J., Mahcene B., Martynov V., Frezza E., Vasnier C., Ponchon L., Coelho D., Bonhomme F., Braud E., Etheve-Quelquejeu M.. et al. Investigation of a squaramide motif as a bioisostere of the amino-acid group of S-Adenosyl-L-methionine and its functional impact on RNA methylation. Communications Chemistry. 2025;8(1):244. doi: 10.1038/s42004-025-01627-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Huber T. D., Wang F., Singh S., Johnson B. R., Zhang J., Sunkara M., Van Lanen S. G., Morris A. J., Phillips G. N. Jr., Thorson J. S.. Functional AdoMet Isosteres Resistant to Classical AdoMet Degradation Pathways. ACS Chem. Biol. 2016;11(9):2484–2491. doi: 10.1021/acschembio.6b00348. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Rudenko A. Y., Mariasina S. S., Bolikhova A. K., Nikulin M. V., Ozhiganov R. M., Vasil’ev V. G., Ikhalaynen Y. A., Khandazhinskaya A. L., Khomutov M. A., Sergiev P. V.. et al. Organophosphorus S-Adenosyl-L-methionine mimetics: synthesis, stability, and substrate properties. Front. Chem. 2024;12:1448747. doi: 10.3389/fchem.2024.1448747. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; Chen H.-A, Okuda T., Lenz A.-K., Scheitl C. P. M., Schindelin H., Höbartner C.. Structure and catalytic activity of the SAM-utilizing ribozyme SAMURI. Nat. Chem. Biol. 2025 doi: 10.1038/s41589-024-01808-w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; Wang W., Zhao H., Yu N., Chen F., Dong M.. Stable S-Adenosylmethionine Analogue for Enzymatic Fluoromethylation. ACS Catal. 2023;13(20):13729–13734. doi: 10.1021/acscatal.3c03313. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  19. Lukinavičius G., Lapinaitė A., Urbanavičiu̅tė G., Gerasimaitė R., Klimašauskas S.. Engineering the DNA cytosine-5 methyltransferase reaction for sequence-specific labeling of DNA. Nucleic Acids Res. 2012;40(22):11594–11602. doi: 10.1093/nar/gks914. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Maji B., Duan X.-H., Jüstel P. M., Byrne P. A., Ofial A. R., Mayr H.. Nucleophilicities and Nucleofugalities of Thio- and Selenoethers. Chem.Eur. J. 2021;27(44):11367–11376. doi: 10.1002/chem.202100977. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Liu Q., Bei Y.. Thermodynamics and Dynamic Kinetics of the Oxidation of Selenomethionine to Methionine Selenoxide: A Dft Study. Progress in Reaction Kinetics and Mechanism. 2010;35(4):417–422. doi: 10.3184/146867810X12913153905848. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  22. Fu Y., Wang H.-J., Chong S.-S., Guo Q.-X., Liu L.. An Extensive Ylide Thermodynamic Stability Scale Predicted by First-Principle Calculations. Journal of Organic Chemistry. 2009;74(2):810–819. doi: 10.1021/jo802128w. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Willnow S., Martin M., Lüscher B., Weinhold E.. A Selenium-Based Click AdoMet Analogue for Versatile Substrate Labeling with Wild-Type Protein Methyltransferases. ChemBioChem. 2012;13(8):1167–1173. doi: 10.1002/cbic.201100781. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Kueck N. A., Hüwel S., Hoffmann A., Rentmeister A.. Quantification of Propargylated RNA Nucleosides After Metabolic Labeling Via the Methylation Pathway. ChemBioChem. 2025;26(7):e202400986. doi: 10.1002/cbic.202400986. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; Sohtome Y., Shimazu T., Shinkai Y., Sodeoka M.. Propargylic Se-adenosyl-l-selenomethionine: A Chemical Tool for Methylome Analysis. Acc. Chem. Res. 2021;54(20):3818–3827. doi: 10.1021/acs.accounts.1c00395. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Schlenk F., Dainko J. L.. The S-n-propyl analogue of S-Adenosylmethionine. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - General Subjects. 1975;385(2):312–323. doi: 10.1016/0304-4165(75)90359-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Shieh P., Dien V. T., Beahm B. J., Castellano J. M., Wyss-Coray T., Bertozzi C. R.. CalFluors: A Universal Motif for Fluorogenic Azide Probes across the Visible Spectrum. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2015;137(22):7145–7151. doi: 10.1021/jacs.5b02383. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

au6c00154_si_001.pdf (15.7MB, pdf)
Download video file (2.1MB, mp4)
Download video file (2MB, mp4)

Articles from JACS Au are provided here courtesy of American Chemical Society

RESOURCES