Skip to main content
PMC home page
Biophysical Journal logoLink to Biophysical Journal
. 2001 May;80(5):2338–2349. doi: 10.1016/s0006-3495(01)76204-2

Theoretical kinetic studies of models for binding myosin subfragment-1 to regulated actin: Hill model versus Geeves model.

Y Chen 1, B Yan 1, J M Chalovich 1, B Brenner 1
PMCID: PMC1301423  PMID: 11325734

Abstract

It was previously shown that a one-dimensional Ising model could successfully simulate the equilibrium binding of myosin S1 to regulated actin filaments (T. L. Hill, E. Eisenberg and L. Greene, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 77:3186-3190, 1980). However, the time course of myosin S1 binding to regulated actin was thought to be incompatible with this model, and a three-state model was subsequently developed (D. F. McKillop and M. A. Geeves, Biophys. J. 65:693-701, 1993). A quantitative analysis of the predicted time course of myosin S1 binding to regulated actin, however, was never done for either model. Here we present the procedure for the theoretical evaluation of the time course of myosin S1 binding for both models and then show that 1) the Hill model can predict the "lag" in the binding of myosin S1 to regulated actin that is observed in the absence of Ca++ when S1 is in excess of actin, and 2) both models generate very similar families of binding curves when [S1]/[actin] is varied. This result shows that, just based on the equilibrium and pre-steady-state kinetic binding data alone, it is not possible to differentiate between the two models. Thus, the model of Hill et al. cannot be ruled out on the basis of existing pre-steady-state and equilibrium binding data. Physical mechanisms underlying the generation of the lag in the Hill model are discussed.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (161.2 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Brenner B., Chalovich J. M. Kinetics of thin filament activation probed by fluorescence of N-((2-(iodoacetoxy)ethyl)-N-methyl)amino-7-nitrobenz-2-oxa-1,3-diazole-labeled troponin I incorporated into skinned fibers of rabbit psoas muscle: implications for regulation of muscle contraction. Biophys J. 1999 Nov;77(5):2692–2708. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(99)77103-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Chalovich J. M. Actin mediated regulation of muscle contraction. Pharmacol Ther. 1992;55(2):95–148. doi: 10.1016/0163-7258(92)90013-p. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Chalovich J. M., Chen Y. D., Dudek R., Luo H. Kinetics of binding of caldesmon to actin. J Biol Chem. 1995 Apr 28;270(17):9911–9916. doi: 10.1074/jbc.270.17.9911. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Chalovich J. M., Chock P. B., Eisenberg E. Mechanism of action of troponin . tropomyosin. Inhibition of actomyosin ATPase activity without inhibition of myosin binding to actin. J Biol Chem. 1981 Jan 25;256(2):575–578. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Chalovich J. M., Eisenberg E. Inhibition of actomyosin ATPase activity by troponin-tropomyosin without blocking the binding of myosin to actin. J Biol Chem. 1982 Mar 10;257(5):2432–2437. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Chen Y., Hill T. L. Use of Monte Carlo calculations in the study of microtubule subunit kinetics. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1983 Dec;80(24):7520–7523. doi: 10.1073/pnas.80.24.7520. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Eisenberg E., Kielley W. W. Native tropomyosin: effect on the interaction of actin with heavy meromyosin and subfragment-1. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1970 Jul 13;40(1):50–56. doi: 10.1016/0006-291x(70)91044-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Geeves M. A., Halsall D. J. Two-step ligand binding and cooperativity. A model to describe the cooperative binding of myosin subfragment 1 to regulated actin. Biophys J. 1987 Aug;52(2):215–220. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(87)83208-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Greene L. E., Eisenberg E. Cooperative binding of myosin subfragment-1 to the actin-troponin-tropomyosin complex. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1980 May;77(5):2616–2620. doi: 10.1073/pnas.77.5.2616. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Hill T. L., Eisenberg E., Chalovich J. M. Theoretical models for cooperative steady-state ATPase activity of myosin subfragment-1 on regulated actin. Biophys J. 1981 Jul;35(1):99–112. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(81)84777-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Hill T. L., Eisenberg E., Greene L. Theoretical model for the cooperative equilibrium binding of myosin subfragment 1 to the actin-troponin-tropomyosin complex. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1980 Jun;77(6):3186–3190. doi: 10.1073/pnas.77.6.3186. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Kraft T., Yu L. C., Kuhn H. J., Brenner B. Effect of Ca2+ on weak cross-bridge interaction with actin in the presence of adenosine 5'-[gamma-thio]triphosphate). Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1992 Dec 1;89(23):11362–11366. doi: 10.1073/pnas.89.23.11362. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. McKillop D. F., Geeves M. A. Regulation of the acto.myosin subfragment 1 interaction by troponin/tropomyosin. Evidence for control of a specific isomerization between two acto.myosin subfragment 1 states. Biochem J. 1991 Nov 1;279(Pt 3):711–718. doi: 10.1042/bj2790711. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. McKillop D. F., Geeves M. A. Regulation of the interaction between actin and myosin subfragment 1: evidence for three states of the thin filament. Biophys J. 1993 Aug;65(2):693–701. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(93)81110-X. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Resetar A. M., Chalovich J. M. Adenosine 5'-(gamma-thiotriphosphate): an ATP analog that should be used with caution in muscle contraction studies. Biochemistry. 1995 Dec 12;34(49):16039–16045. doi: 10.1021/bi00049a018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Tobacman L. S., Butters C. A. A new model of cooperative myosin-thin filament binding. J Biol Chem. 2000 Sep 8;275(36):27587–27593. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M003648200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Trybus K. M., Taylor E. W. Kinetic studies of the cooperative binding of subfragment 1 to regulated actin. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1980 Dec;77(12):7209–7213. doi: 10.1073/pnas.77.12.7209. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Vibert P., Craig R., Lehman W. Steric-model for activation of muscle thin filaments. J Mol Biol. 1997 Feb 14;266(1):8–14. doi: 10.1006/jmbi.1996.0800. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Wagner P. D., Giniger E. Calcium-sensitive binding of heavy meromyosin to regulated actin in the presence of ATP. J Biol Chem. 1981 Dec 25;256(24):12647–12650. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Williams D. L., Jr, Greene L. E. Comparison of the effects of tropomyosin and troponin-tropomyosin on the binding of myosin subfragment 1 to actin. Biochemistry. 1983 May 24;22(11):2770–2774. doi: 10.1021/bi00280a027. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Williams D. L., Jr, Greene L. E., Eisenberg E. Cooperative turning on of myosin subfragment 1 adenosinetriphosphatase activity by the troponin-tropomyosin-actin complex. Biochemistry. 1988 Sep 6;27(18):6987–6993. doi: 10.1021/bi00418a048. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Xu C., Craig R., Tobacman L., Horowitz R., Lehman W. Tropomyosin positions in regulated thin filaments revealed by cryoelectron microscopy. Biophys J. 1999 Aug;77(2):985–992. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(99)76949-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Zou G., Phillips G. N., Jr A cellular automaton model for the regulatory behavior of muscle thin filaments. Biophys J. 1994 Jul;67(1):11–28. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(94)80475-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Biophysical Journal are provided here courtesy of The Biophysical Society

RESOURCES