Skip to main content
PMC home page
Biophysical Journal logoLink to Biophysical Journal
. 2001 Sep;81(3):1314–1323. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(01)75788-8

A diffusion-translocation model for gradient sensing by chemotactic cells.

M Postma 1, P J Van Haastert 1
PMCID: PMC1301612  PMID: 11509347

Abstract

Small chemotactic cells like Dictyostelium and neutrophils transduce shallow spatial chemoattractant gradients into strongly localized intracellular responses. We show that the capacity of a second messenger to establish and maintain localized signals, is mainly determined by its dispersion range, lambda = the square root of D(m)/k(-1), which must be small compared to the cell's length. Therefore, short-living second messengers (high k(-1)) with diffusion coefficients D(m) in the range of 0-5 microm(2) s(-1) are most suitable. Additional to short dispersion ranges, gradient sensing may include positive feedback mechanisms that lead to local activation and global inhibition of second-messenger production. To introduce the essential nonlinear amplification, we have investigated models in which one or more components of the signal transduction cascade translocate from the cytosol to the second messenger in the plasma membrane. A one-component model is able to amplify a 1.5-fold difference of receptor activity over the cell length into a 15-fold difference of second-messenger concentration. Amplification can be improved considerably by introducing an additional activating component that translocates to the membrane. In both models, communication between the front and the back of the cell is mediated by partial depletion of cytosolic components, which leads to both local activation and global inhibition. The results suggest that a biochemically simple and general mechanism may explain various signal localization phenomena not only in chemotactic cells but also those occurring in morphogenesis and cell differentiation.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (342.1 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Allbritton N. L., Meyer T., Stryer L. Range of messenger action of calcium ion and inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate. Science. 1992 Dec 11;258(5089):1812–1815. doi: 10.1126/science.1465619. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Arrio-Dupont M., Foucault G., Vacher M., Devaux P. F., Cribier S. Translational diffusion of globular proteins in the cytoplasm of cultured muscle cells. Biophys J. 2000 Feb;78(2):901–907. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(00)76647-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Chen C., Nakamura T., Koutalos Y. Cyclic AMP diffusion coefficient in frog olfactory cilia. Biophys J. 1999 May;76(5):2861–2867. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(99)77440-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Devreotes P. N., Zigmond S. H. Chemotaxis in eukaryotic cells: a focus on leukocytes and Dictyostelium. Annu Rev Cell Biol. 1988;4:649–686. doi: 10.1146/annurev.cb.04.110188.003245. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Firtel R. A., Chung C. Y. The molecular genetics of chemotaxis: sensing and responding to chemoattractant gradients. Bioessays. 2000 Jul;22(7):603–615. doi: 10.1002/1521-1878(200007)22:7<603::AID-BIES3>3.0.CO;2-#. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Haugh J. M., Codazzi F., Teruel M., Meyer T. Spatial sensing in fibroblasts mediated by 3' phosphoinositides. J Cell Biol. 2000 Dec 11;151(6):1269–1280. doi: 10.1083/jcb.151.6.1269. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Haugh J. M., Lauffenburger D. A. Physical modulation of intracellular signaling processes by locational regulation. Biophys J. 1997 May;72(5):2014–2031. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(97)78846-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Heldin C. H., Westermark B. Mechanism of action and in vivo role of platelet-derived growth factor. Physiol Rev. 1999 Oct;79(4):1283–1316. doi: 10.1152/physrev.1999.79.4.1283. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Korlach J., Schwille P., Webb W. W., Feigenson G. W. Characterization of lipid bilayer phases by confocal microscopy and fluorescence correlation spectroscopy. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1999 Jul 20;96(15):8461–8466. doi: 10.1073/pnas.96.15.8461. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Meinhardt H., Gierer A. Pattern formation by local self-activation and lateral inhibition. Bioessays. 2000 Aug;22(8):753–760. doi: 10.1002/1521-1878(200008)22:8<753::AID-BIES9>3.0.CO;2-Z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Meinhardt H. Orientation of chemotactic cells and growth cones: models and mechanisms. J Cell Sci. 1999 Sep;112(Pt 17):2867–2874. doi: 10.1242/jcs.112.17.2867. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Niv H., Gutman O., Henis Y. I., Kloog Y. Membrane interactions of a constitutively active GFP-Ki-Ras 4B and their role in signaling. Evidence from lateral mobility studies. J Biol Chem. 1999 Jan 15;274(3):1606–1613. doi: 10.1074/jbc.274.3.1606. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Parent C. A., Blacklock B. J., Froehlich W. M., Murphy D. B., Devreotes P. N. G protein signaling events are activated at the leading edge of chemotactic cells. Cell. 1998 Oct 2;95(1):81–91. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)81784-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Parent C. A., Devreotes P. N. A cell's sense of direction. Science. 1999 Apr 30;284(5415):765–770. doi: 10.1126/science.284.5415.765. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Rebecchi M. J., Scarlata S. Pleckstrin homology domains: a common fold with diverse functions. Annu Rev Biophys Biomol Struct. 1998;27:503–528. doi: 10.1146/annurev.biophys.27.1.503. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Servant G., Weiner O. D., Herzmark P., Balla T., Sedat J. W., Bourne H. R. Polarization of chemoattractant receptor signaling during neutrophil chemotaxis. Science. 2000 Feb 11;287(5455):1037–1040. doi: 10.1126/science.287.5455.1037. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Stock A. M., Mowbray S. L. Bacterial chemotaxis: a field in motion. Curr Opin Struct Biol. 1995 Dec;5(6):744–751. doi: 10.1016/0959-440x(95)80006-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Stock J. B., Ninfa A. J., Stock A. M. Protein phosphorylation and regulation of adaptive responses in bacteria. Microbiol Rev. 1989 Dec;53(4):450–490. doi: 10.1128/mr.53.4.450-490.1989. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Teruel M. N., Meyer T. Translocation and reversible localization of signaling proteins: a dynamic future for signal transduction. Cell. 2000 Oct 13;103(2):181–184. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)00109-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Tomchik K. J., Devreotes P. N. Adenosine 3',5'-monophosphate waves in Dictyostelium discoideum: a demonstration by isotope dilution--fluorography. Science. 1981 Apr 24;212(4493):443–446. doi: 10.1126/science.6259734. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Xiao Z., Zhang N., Murphy D. B., Devreotes P. N. Dynamic distribution of chemoattractant receptors in living cells during chemotaxis and persistent stimulation. J Cell Biol. 1997 Oct 20;139(2):365–374. doi: 10.1083/jcb.139.2.365. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Biophysical Journal are provided here courtesy of The Biophysical Society

RESOURCES