Skip to main content
Plant Physiology logoLink to Plant Physiology
letter
. 2026 Mar 6;200(3):kiag040. doi: 10.1093/plphys/kiag040

Snowwhite: a rapid genetic tool for sweet potato functional genomics

Kui Peng 1,#, Yiwei Bai 2,#, Zhuoru Dai 3, Meiqi Shang 4, Jun Zhang 5, Hong Zhai 6, Shaopei Gao 7, Ning Zhao 8, Qingchang Liu 9, Shaozhen He 10,11, Huan Zhang 12,13,3,✉,4
PMCID: PMC13017151  PMID: 41790007

Abstract

The sweet potato albino mutant “Snowwhite” serves as an auxiliary platform for studying gene function and editing efficiency.


Dear Editor,

Albinism, a naturally occurring lethal genetic mutation in plants, disrupts photosynthesis by blocking chlorophyll biosynthesis. Albino seedlings serve as valuable tools for ornamental breeding and functional studies, particularly in investigating photosynthesis, phytohormone regulation, and environmental responses. While diploid species such as rice and maize readily develop homozygous recessive albino phenotypes, this trait remains largely undocumented in polyploid crops, including the hexaploid sweet potato (Ipomoea batatas, 2n = 6x = 90). This study successfully developed and characterized the sweet potato albino mutant “Snowwhite,” revealing that IbMYB70 plays a key role in its albino phenotype. The absence of chloroplasts and thin cell walls in Snowwhite contribute to its exceptional callus induction and root regeneration, high explant transformation rates, and superior protoplast isolation capacity, thus establishing Snowwhite as an auxiliary platform for functional validation of development-, quality-, and stress-related genes, as well as for assessing gene-editing efficiency and dissecting molecular mechanisms in sweet potato.

Sweet potato possesses thickened cell walls and contains abundant phenolic compounds, which rapidly oxidize into cytotoxic quinone derivatives upon wounding, suppressing cell division and making callus induction from root, stem, and leaf tissues extremely challenging. Moreover, protoplast isolation from sweet potato exhibits low efficiency. Current genetic transformation primarily employs technically challenging and time-consuming apical meristem-derived suspension cell lines or stem-based methods such as the cut-dip-budding delivery system (Cao et al. 2022) or one-step Agrobacterium-mediated transformation system (Zhang et al. 2023), which frequently produce chimeric plants and suffer from limited gene-editing efficiency and high land requirements. Furthermore, the asexual propagation of sweet potato complicates the identification of chimeras and the recovery of stable, non-chimeric plants. Developing novel, highly efficient auxiliary genetic validation tools is therefore imperative for advancing functional genomics in sweet potato. Here, we established a stable albino mutant “Snowwhite” through somaclonal variation. This study evaluates its utility for functional genomics applications.

We previously obtained a salt-tolerant and disease-resistant mutant, LM1 (renamed ND98), through gamma-ray-induced mutation (Zhang et al. 2017, 2020). Shoot apical meristems excised from ND98 were used to establish an embryogenic cell suspension line, from which plants were regenerated to induce somaclonal variation. Among approximately 9,000 cell aggregates, a single soft albino mutant (designated “Snowwhite’) was obtained (Fig. S1a). It exhibited stable survival under in vitro culture with intense illumination for 13 yr (2012 to 2025), displaying white and small leaves, and pale green stems compared to ND98 (Fig. 1a; Fig. S1b and S1c).

Figure 1.

For image description, please refer to the figure legend and surrounding text.

Snowwhite is a rapid genetic tool for sweet potato functional genomics. a) Plant morphology of 1-mo-old ND98 and Snowwhite plants. Bars = 1.5 cm. b) TEM observation of leaves, stems, and roots in 1-mo-old ND98 and Snowwhite. CH, chloroplast; CW, cell wall; MI, mitochondria; Bars = 1 µm. c) Chlorophyll content in leaves. Chl a, Chlorophyll a; Chl b, Chlorophyll b; Total chl, total Chlorophyll. d) Lignin and cellulose contents in stems. e) Venn diagram showing 1,654 DEGs commonly upregulated in leaves, stems, and roots of ND98 compared to Snowwhite. f) GO enrichment analysis of the 1,654 DEGs. g) SNP-index diagram showing variation location on the chromosome 1B. The red horizontal line indicates the threshold for significant association. The black curve shows the Δ(SNP-index) calculated using a sliding window approach. The red and blue curve indicate the 95% and 99% confidence intervals under the null hypothesis, respectively. h) Relative expression of IbMYB70 of leaves, stems, and roots in ND98 and Snowwhite. i) Sanger sequencing validation of SNPs in ND98 and Snowwhite. j) Regenerated roots in Snowwhite stems infected with K599-35S::IbMYB70. The red arrows represent regenerated roots. Bars = 0.3 cm. k) Leaf phenotype of IbMYB70-overexpressing (IbMYB70-OE) plants and WT plants. Bars = 0.5 cm. l) Chlorophyll content in leaves of WT and IbMYB70-OE plants. m) Regenerated roots from different tissues after K599-35S::GFP infection. Bars = 0.3 cm. n) Callus formation rates in leaves, petioles, and stems of ND98, Snowwhite, and Lizixiang. (LZX). Three biological replicates consisting of 40 explants were presented. o) Root regeneration efficiency in leaves, petioles, and stems of ND98, Snowwhite, and LZX. Three biological replicates consisting of 32 explants were presented. p) Regenerated buds and roots infected with K599-35S::RUBY. The red arrows represent regenerated buds or roots. Bars = 0.3 cm. q) CRISPR-Cas9 editing at the exon of IbMYB308L in Snowwhite explant. The PAM sequence was indicated by blue, respectively. r) Protoplast extraction rate in ND98 and Snowwhite. s) Subcellular localization of pCAMBIA1300-GFP. Bars = 10 µm. All data in c, d, h, l, n, o, and r presented as mean ± SD (n = 3); *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001 (2-tailed Student's t-test). Different letters indicated statistically significant differences (1-way ANOVA followed by post hoc Tukey test; P < 0.05).

Paraffin section analysis revealed that Snowwhite leaves exhibited loosely arranged spongy and palisade mesophyll cells with reduced cell layers and thinner leaf blades compared to ND98 (Fig. S2a and S2c). In stems, both xylem and phloem were underdeveloped in Snowwhite (Fig. S2b). Snowwhite roots displayed irregularly arranged xylem vessels with reduced density (Fig. S2a and S2d). Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) further demonstrated aberrant chloroplast development in Snowwhite leaves, significantly thinner cell walls in its stems, as well as abnormal mitochondrial cristae architecture in its roots compared to ND98 (Fig. 1b). Consistent with these structural observations, Snowwhite showed significantly lower chlorophyll a and b and total chlorophyll content in leaves (Fig. 1c) and reduced lignin and cellulose accumulation in stems compared to ND98 (Fig. 1d).

To investigate the genetic mechanisms underlying albinism, we performed comparative transcriptomic and genomic analyses of Snowwhite and ND98 (Materials and methods; table S1–S4). A total of 1,654 differentially expressed genes (DEGs; |log2FC| ≥ 1, P < 0.05) were significantly upregulated in ND98 compared to Snowwhite across root, stem, and leaf tissues (Fig. 1e; Table S1). Gene Ontology (GO) enrichment analysis revealed that these DEGs were enriched in pathways such as developmental growth (GO:0048589), chlorophyll metabolic process (GO:0015994), and leaf senescence (GO:0010150) (Fig. 1f; Table S2). Comparative genomic analysis of high-coverage resequencing data (Snowwhite, 200×; ND98, 50×) identified a 5.32 Mb quantitative trait locus (QTL) on chromosome 1 (Chr01B: 35,877,298 to 40,193,319). To prioritize causal genes, we defined a 500 kb candidate interval (Chr01B: 37,850,263 to 38,850,263) centered on the peak G′ statistic locus (Chr01B:38,350,263; P < 1 × 10⁻5), encompassing 149 annotated protein-coding genes (Fig. 1g; Table S3). Notably, the intronless gene Ibat.Brg_v3.01BG038880, encoding a MYB transcription factor IbMYB70 with the highest homology to AtMYB70 in Arabidopsis (Fig. S3a; Wan et al. 2021), exhibited undetectable expression levels in Snowwhite but was constitutively expressed in ND98 roots, stems, and leaves (Table S1; Fig. 1h). Sanger sequencing of IbMYB70 coding regions revealed a truncation mutation (a premature stop codon in the exon, TTA to TGA) within the conserved MYB DNA-binding domain of Snowwhite (Fig. 1i; Fig. S3b). To investigate the functional implications, we overexpressed IbMYB70 in Snowwhite. Green regenerated roots derived from callus cultures of Snowwhite stem segments were observed (Fig. 1j). TEM observations demonstrated that the overexpression of IbMYB70 restored the chloroplast structure in leaves, cell wall thickness in stems, and mitochondrial morphology in roots to that of the ND98 wild-type (WT) phenotype (Fig. 1b; Fig. S4). Furthermore, we overexpressed IbMYB70 in the easily transformable, green-leafed cultivar Lizixiang and obtained 3 IbMYB70-OE lines (Fig. S5a). Stably transformed IbMYB70-OE plants exhibited visibly darker green leaves compared to WT (Fig. 1k), with significantly increased chlorophyll a, chlorophyll b, and total chlorophyll content (Fig. 1l). Paraffin section analysis revealed that overexpression of IbMYB70 increased the number of xylem vessels in the roots (Fig. S5b).

To elucidate the regulatory mechanism of IbMYB70, we analyzed the transcriptome of Snowwhite and identified several DEGs involved in chlorophyll biosynthesis, cell wall metabolism, lignin biosynthesis, and ROS metabolism (Fig. S6a), all of which contain MYB-binding sites within their 2,000 bp upstream promoter sequences (Fig. S6b). ChIP-qPCR and EMSAs confirmed that IbMYB70 directly binds to the promoters of the chlorophyll biosynthesis-related gene IbHEMA (encoding glutamyl-tRNA reductase; Zeng et al. 2020), the cell wall metabolism-related gene IbXET (encoding xyloglucan endotransglucosylase; Rose et al. 2002), the lignin biosynthesis-related gene IbC4H (encoding cinnamate 4-hydroxylase; Boerjan et al. 2003), and the ROS metabolism-related gene IbRBOH (encoding respiratory burst oxidase homolog; Felix et al. 2024; Fig. S6c to S6j). Furthermore, RT–qPCR and Dual-LUC assays demonstrated that IbMYB70 strongly activates the expression of IbHEMA, IbXET, IbC4H, and IbRBOH (Fig. S6k to S6o).

After 2 wk of Agrobacterium rhizogenes-mediated transformation, we observed remarkably high callus induction rates (69.33% to 92.66%) from leaf, petiole, and stem explants from Snowwhite. In contrast, Lizixiang showed rates of 13.50% to 39.80%, while ND98 showed only 0% to 12.33% (Fig. 1m and 1n). After 1 wk of culture, adventitious roots gradually developed from the Snowwhite callus. The leaf-derived callus exhibited a root regeneration rate of 83.66%, whereas the rates for Lizixiang and ND98 were 18.92% and complete failure, respectively (Fig. 1o; Fig. S7a and S7b). Subsequently, we introduced the 35S::RUBY construct into Snowwhite. Within 3 wk, we successfully obtained red-pigmented stable transgenic buds (achieving a 10.69% transformation efficiency) and red transgenic roots (14.12% efficiency) via A. rhizogenes-mediated transformation, whereas no positive transgenic events were detected in ND98 (Fig. 1p; Fig. S7c to S7e). Furthermore, we employed A. rhizogenes-mediated transformation to validate the efficacy of the “Snowwhite” system for CRISPR-Cas9 gene editing. We obtained 26 CRISPR-Cas9 positive transgenic lines (49.06% positive efficiency, Fig. S7f), including 3 IbMYB308L gene-editing lines (11.54% efficiency, Fig. S7f). Sanger sequencing of these edited lines revealed deletions or substitutions in 16.67%, 28.57%, and 100% of the sequenced alleles for Lines #21, #18, and #20, respectively (Fig. S8, Fig. 1q). Notably, all mutations were localized to the sgRNA1 target site, with no editing detected at the sgRNA2 site. These results suggest that the editing events occurred in 1, 2, or all 6 homologous alleles of the hexaploid genome. These results demonstrate that the albino Snowwhite-based transformation system is rapid and efficient, offering broad application prospects for the functional characterization of candidate genes governing root development, quality traits (eg, carotenoids, anthocyanins), and stress tolerance (eg, salinity, drought) in sweet potato breeding.

Furthermore, given Snowwhite's thin cell walls and nearly absent chloroplasts, its protoplast extraction rate was 9.52 × 106 g−1 FW, markedly higher than ND98's 1.68 × 106 g−1 FW (Fig. 1r). The extracted protoplasts were successfully used in subcellular localization and Dual-LUC experiments. Green fluorescent signals appeared in both the nucleus and plasma membrane, indicating successful expression and localization of pCAMBIA1300-GFP (Fig. 1s). Dual-LUC assay in Snowwhite protoplasts showed that transcription factor IbMYB70 significantly activated the expression of IbHEMA, a gene encoding glutamyl-tRNA reductase in the chlorophyll biosynthesis pathway (Zeng et al. 2020), which was among the 1,654 DEGs significantly downregulated in Snowwhite (Table S1; Fig. S7g). These results highlight the utility of Snowwhite protoplasts for molecular mechanisms validation and gene-editing efficiency test in sweet potato functional genomics.

In summary, our study successfully developed and characterized the sweet potato albino mutant “Snowwhite”, revealing that IbMYB70 plays a key role in its albino phenotype. The absent chloroplasts and thin cell walls in Snowwhite contribute to its exceptional callus induction and root regeneration, high explant transformation rates, and superior protoplast isolation capacity, thus establishing Snowwhite as an auxiliary platform for functional validation of development-, quality-, and stress-related genes, as well as for assessing gene-editing efficiency and dissecting molecular mechanisms in sweet potato. Furthermore, this hexaploid albino mutant holds significant potential for advancing research in ornamental breeding, source-sink dynamics, photosynthetic regulation, phytohormone signaling, and environmental adaptation studies.

Supplementary Material

kiag040_Supplementary_Data

Contributor Information

Kui Peng, Frontiers Science Center for Molecular Design Breeding/key Laboratory of Sweet Potato Biology and Biotechnology, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs/Beijing Key Laboratory of Crop Genetic Improvement/Laboratory of Crop Heterosis and Utilization, Ministry of Education, College of Agronomy & Biotechnology, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China.

Yiwei Bai, Frontiers Science Center for Molecular Design Breeding/key Laboratory of Sweet Potato Biology and Biotechnology, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs/Beijing Key Laboratory of Crop Genetic Improvement/Laboratory of Crop Heterosis and Utilization, Ministry of Education, College of Agronomy & Biotechnology, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China.

Zhuoru Dai, Frontiers Science Center for Molecular Design Breeding/key Laboratory of Sweet Potato Biology and Biotechnology, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs/Beijing Key Laboratory of Crop Genetic Improvement/Laboratory of Crop Heterosis and Utilization, Ministry of Education, College of Agronomy & Biotechnology, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China.

Meiqi Shang, Frontiers Science Center for Molecular Design Breeding/key Laboratory of Sweet Potato Biology and Biotechnology, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs/Beijing Key Laboratory of Crop Genetic Improvement/Laboratory of Crop Heterosis and Utilization, Ministry of Education, College of Agronomy & Biotechnology, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China.

Jun Zhang, Frontiers Science Center for Molecular Design Breeding/key Laboratory of Sweet Potato Biology and Biotechnology, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs/Beijing Key Laboratory of Crop Genetic Improvement/Laboratory of Crop Heterosis and Utilization, Ministry of Education, College of Agronomy & Biotechnology, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China.

Hong Zhai, Frontiers Science Center for Molecular Design Breeding/key Laboratory of Sweet Potato Biology and Biotechnology, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs/Beijing Key Laboratory of Crop Genetic Improvement/Laboratory of Crop Heterosis and Utilization, Ministry of Education, College of Agronomy & Biotechnology, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China.

Shaopei Gao, Frontiers Science Center for Molecular Design Breeding/key Laboratory of Sweet Potato Biology and Biotechnology, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs/Beijing Key Laboratory of Crop Genetic Improvement/Laboratory of Crop Heterosis and Utilization, Ministry of Education, College of Agronomy & Biotechnology, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China.

Ning Zhao, Frontiers Science Center for Molecular Design Breeding/key Laboratory of Sweet Potato Biology and Biotechnology, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs/Beijing Key Laboratory of Crop Genetic Improvement/Laboratory of Crop Heterosis and Utilization, Ministry of Education, College of Agronomy & Biotechnology, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China.

Qingchang Liu, Frontiers Science Center for Molecular Design Breeding/key Laboratory of Sweet Potato Biology and Biotechnology, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs/Beijing Key Laboratory of Crop Genetic Improvement/Laboratory of Crop Heterosis and Utilization, Ministry of Education, College of Agronomy & Biotechnology, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China.

Shaozhen He, Frontiers Science Center for Molecular Design Breeding/key Laboratory of Sweet Potato Biology and Biotechnology, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs/Beijing Key Laboratory of Crop Genetic Improvement/Laboratory of Crop Heterosis and Utilization, Ministry of Education, College of Agronomy & Biotechnology, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China; Sanya Institute of China Agricultural University, China Agricultural University, Sanya 572025, China.

Huan Zhang, Frontiers Science Center for Molecular Design Breeding/key Laboratory of Sweet Potato Biology and Biotechnology, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs/Beijing Key Laboratory of Crop Genetic Improvement/Laboratory of Crop Heterosis and Utilization, Ministry of Education, College of Agronomy & Biotechnology, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China; Sanya Institute of China Agricultural University, China Agricultural University, Sanya 572025, China.

Supplementary material

Supplementary material is available at Plant Physiology online.

Author contributions

H. Zhang and S.H. conceived and designed the research. K.P. and Y.B. analyzed the data. K.P., Y.B., Z.D., J.Z., and M.S. performed the experiments. H. Zhang, K.P., and Y.B. wrote the paper. Q.L., H. Zhai, N.Z., and S.G. revised the paper. All authors read and approved the final version of the paper.

Funding

This work was supported by the National Key R&D Program of China (2023YFD1200700/2023YFD1200703), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant no. 32472157), the Beijing Food Crops Innovation Consortium Program (BAIC02-2026), the Earmarked Fund for CARS-10-Sweetpotato, the 2115 Talent Development Program of China Agricultural University, and the Chinese Universities Scientific Fund (2025TC141).

Data availability

The resequencing and RNA-seq data of ND98 and Snowwhite are available in the NCBI database under accession code PRJNA1244576. Supporting data for this study can be found in the supplemental materials.

References

  1. Boerjan  W, Ralph  J, Baucher  M. 2003. Lignin biosynthesis. Annu Rev Plant Biol. 54:519–546. 10.1146/annurev.arplant.54.031902.134938. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Cao  X  et al.  2022. Cut–dip–budding delivery system enables genetic modifications in plants without tissue culture. Innovation. 4:100345. 10.1016/j.xinn.2022.100345. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Felix  JMR, Alisdair  RF, Fayezeh  A. 2024. Roles and regulation of the RBOHD enzyme in initiating ROS-mediated systemic signaling during biotic and abiotic stress. Plant Stress. 11:100327. 10.1016/j.stress.2023.100327. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  4. Rose  J, Braam  J, Fry  S, Nishitani  K. 2002. The XTH family of enzymes involved in xyloglucan endotransglucosylation and endohydrolysis: current perspectives and a new unifying nomenclature. Plant and Cell Physiol. 43:1421–1435. 10.1093/pcp/pcf171. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Wan  J  et al.  2021. MYB70 modulates seed germination and root system development in Arabidopsis. iScience. 24:103228. 10.1016/j.isci.2021.103228. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Zeng  Z  et al.  2020. Oshema gene, encoding glutamyl-tRNA reductase (GluTR) is essential for chlorophyll biosynthesis in rice (Oryza sativa). J Integr Agric. 19:612–623. 10.1016/S2095-3119(19)62710-3. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  7. Zhang  H  et al.  2017. Characterization of salt tolerance and fusarium wilt resistance of a sweetpotato mutant. J Integr Agric. 16:1946–1955. 10.1016/S2095-3119(16)61519-8. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  8. Zhang  H  et al.  2020. IbBBX24 promotes the jasmonic acid pathway and enhances fusarium wilt resistance in sweet potato. Plant Cell. 32:1102–1123. 10.1105/tpc.19.00641. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Zhang  W  et al.  2023. Fast track to obtain heritable transgenic sweet potato inspired by its evolutionary history as a naturally transgenic plant. Plant Biotec J. 21:671–673. 10.1111/pbi.13986. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

kiag040_Supplementary_Data

Data Availability Statement

The resequencing and RNA-seq data of ND98 and Snowwhite are available in the NCBI database under accession code PRJNA1244576. Supporting data for this study can be found in the supplemental materials.


Articles from Plant Physiology are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES