Abstract
Objective
This study aimed to compare the impact of general anesthesia (GA) versus non-GA on functional outcomes in elderly patients undergoing endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) for acute ischemic stroke.
Methods
A total of 707 elderly stroke patients (mean age 74.7 ± 6.8 years; 57.0% male) who received EVT were retrospectively analyzed. Patients were stratified into GA (48.1%) and non-GA (51.9%) groups. The primary outcome was the rate of good functional outcome, defined as a modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score of 0–2 at 90 days. Secondary outcomes included successful reperfusion (mTICI 2b-3), symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage (sICH), early neurological deterioration, post-stroke pneumonia, mortality, and median mRS score at 90 days.
Results
Baseline characteristics were comparable between the GA and non-GA groups, except for a marginally longer onset to groin puncture time in the GA group (p = 0.092). The primary outcome of good functional recovery at 90 days was not significantly different between the GA and non-GA groups (46.8% vs. 44.1%; adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.359, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.913–2.022; p = 0.131). No significant differences were observed in successful reperfusion, sICH, early neurological deterioration, mortality, or median mRS scores. However, the GA group had a significantly higher incidence of post-stroke pneumonia compared to the non-GA group (37.9% vs. 27.5%; aOR 1.668, 95% CI 1.197–2.325; p = 0.003).
Conclusion
In elderly stroke patients undergoing EVT, the type of anesthesia was not associated with significant differences in 90-day functional outcomes. However, GA was linked to a higher risk of post-stroke pneumonia.
Keywords: anesthesia choice, elderly patients, function outcome, stroke, thrombectomy
1. Introduction
Acute ischemic stroke represents a major cause of mortality and long-term disability worldwide, particularly among the elderly (1, 2). Endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) has become the standard of care for eligible patients with large vessel occlusion (3). However, the optimal choice of anesthesia modality for EVT remains a subject of debate (4, 5). General anesthesia (GA) may offer better procedural conditions by minimizing patient movement, yet it carries potential risks such as hemodynamic instability and delayed intervention (6, 7). Conversely, procedural sedation (PS) and local anesthesia (LA) allows for faster workflow and avoids the cardiovascular effects of GA, but may be associated with patient agitation or compromised airway protection (8).
Previous studies and meta-analyses have yielded conflicting results regarding the impact of anesthesia type on functional outcomes, with some suggesting better outcomes under GA and others favoring PS/LA or showing no difference (5, 9–11). This inconsistency may be partly explained by variations in patient characteristics, procedural protocols, and outcome definitions. Importantly, constituting a growing proportion of stroke cases, elderly patients often present with more comorbidities and may be more vulnerable to anesthesia-related complications (12). We hypothesized that anesthesia choice is linked to differential risks of complications and recovery profiles in this vulnerable population. Nevertheless, the literature specifically examining this age group is lacking.
Hence, we performed a multi-center study to evaluate the association of anesthetic strategies with procedure-related and clinical outcomes in elderly patients undergoing EVT for acute ischemic stroke.
2. Methods
2.1. Study design and participating centers
This retrospective multicenter cohort study included ischemic stroke patients receiving EVT who were prospectively enrolled in 5 stroke centers in China (Center 1: Suzhou Ninth People’s Hospital, April 2021–March 2025; Center 2: W Nanjing First Hospital, January 2024–December 2024; Center 3: The First Hospital of Anhui University of Science and Technology, September 2023–March 2025; Center 4: Suzhou Xiangcheng People’s Hospital, July 2019–June 2025; Center 5: The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, January 2019–June 2025). The inclusion criteria for this study were as follows: (1) aged greater than or equal to 65 years; (2) patients with acute ischemic stroke due to proximal large vessel occlusion (internal carotid artery and/or M1-M2 segment of the middle cerebral artery). We further excluded patients whose anesthetic method was not specifically recorded or who had converted from PS/LA to GA. The remaining patients were divided into two groups according to the anesthesia type: the GA group and the non-GA group. The non-GA group comprised patients who received PS or LA only. Patients in the non-GA group were administered a subcutaneous injection of Xylocaine, supplemented when needed with low-dose short-acting analgesic or sedative agents. Patients in GA received analgesics and/or sedatives at higher doses at the discretion of anesthetists. For patients treated with GA, early extubation was targeted whenever feasible. The study complied with the Helsinki Declaration and received approval from the institutional review board at each participating center. Due to the retrospective design, the Ethics Committee granted a waiver for informed consent.
2.2. Baseline data collection and assessment criteria
Baseline data were collected prospectively at the time of admission and included: 1. Demographic variables: age and sex; 2. Clinical variables: baseline BP levels, medical history, stroke severity, stroke etiology, and infarct volume. Stroke severity was assessed using National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS). Pre-treatment infarct volume was measured by the Alberta stroke program early computerized tomography score (ASPECT) (13). Stroke subtype was classified according to the criteria of Trial of Org 10,172 in Acute Stroke Treatment (14); 3. Radiographic variables: occlusive site and collateral circulation. Collateral status was assessed using the American Society of Interventional and Therapeutic Neuroradiology/Society of Interventional Radiology grading system, with grade 0–1 indicating poor collateral circulation and grade 2–4 indicating moderate to excellent (15); 4. Treatment characteristics: prior t-PA treatment, time intervals, time of EVT passes, and degree of reperfusion. Successful reperfusion was defined as modified Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction score of 2b or 3 (16, 17); 5. Laboratory variables: baseline blood glucose and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP).
2.3. Outcome measures
The primary outcome measure was the favorable outcome, defined as a modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score of 0–2 at 90 days. Secondary outcomes included the rate of successful reperfusion, the distribution of mRS score, early neurological deterioration (END) and post-stroke pneumonia. Safety outcomes included all-cause mortality at 90 days and the rates of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH). The sICH was diagnosed within 24 h of EVT treatment using the Heidelberg Bleeding Classification (18, 19). END was defined as an increase of ≥ 4 points in NIHSS score within 24 h after EVT (20, 21). Post-stroke pneumonia was diagnosed in accordance with the modified Centers for Disease Control and Prevention criteria for hospital-acquired pneumonia. The diagnosis, made by trained clinicians based on clinical and laboratory parameters of acute lower respiratory tract infection, was supported by radiographic confirmation (22, 23).
2.4. Statistical analysis
Continuous variables were described as the mean (SD) or median (IQR) as appropriate. Categorical variables were described as numbers (percentage). Normality of distributions was assessed using histograms and the Shapiro–Wilk test. Categorical variables were examined using the χ2 test. Mann–Whitney U test was used for skewed data, while Student’s t-test was used for normally distributed data.
The effects of the anesthetic approach (GA vs. non-GA) were estimated by logistic regression analyses. All multivariable analyses were adjusted for potential confounders included demographic characteristics, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, baseline NIHSS score, pre-treatment ASPECTS, poor collateral status, No. of passes, levels of baseline blood glucose and Hs-CRP. Several sensitivity analyses were conducted to test the robustness of our findings. Furthermore, ordinal regression analysis was used to explore the association between anesthetic choice and the distribution of mRS score. Adjusted odds ratios (OR) were reported, along with their p values and 95% confidence interval (CI). Statistical significance was defined as a p value of <0.05. All analyses were processed using SPSS version 26 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY).
3. Results
3.1. Study population and baseline characteristics
A total of 707 elderly stroke patients (mean age 74.7 ± 6.8 years; 57.0% male) who underwent EVT were included in this study. The most prevalent vascular risk factor was hypertension (76.2%), followed by diabetes mellitus (35.2%), current smoking (36.4%), coronary heart disease (17.4%), and hyperlipidemia (10.9%). The median baseline NIHSS score was 14.0, and median pre-treatment ASPECTS was 9.0. According to the TOAST, the most common stroke etiology was large-artery atherosclerosis (48.7%), followed by cardio-embolism (42.3%). The majority of occlusions were located in the middle cerebral artery (60.7%). Regarding to treatment characteristics, 36.5% of patients received tPA treatment before EVT, and the median onset to groin puncture time was 276.5 min.
Of these, 340 patients underwent GA (48.1%) and 367 underwent PS/LA (51.9%). Patients under GA had a slightly longer onset to groin puncture time than those in non-GA group (p = 0.092). However, no statistically significant differences observed across other demographic characterstics, clinical, and treatment characteristics (all p > 0.05) (see Table 1).
Table 1.
Baseline characteristics according to the anesthesia choice.
| Variables | All patients (n = 707) | General anesthesia (n = 340) | Non-general anesthesia (n = 367) | p value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Demographic characteristics | ||||
| Age, years | 74.7 ± 6.8 | 75.1 ± 7.0 | 74.3 ± 6.6 | 0.137 |
| Male, n (%) | 403 (57.0) | 194 (57.1) | 209 (56.9) | 0.976 |
| Risk factors, n (%) | ||||
| Hypertension | 539 (76.2) | 262 (77.1) | 277 (75.1) | 0.621 |
| Diabetes mellitus | 249 (35.2) | 123 (36.2) | 126 (34.3) | 0.608 |
| Hyperlipidemia | 77 (10.9) | 42 (12.4) | 35 (9.5) | 0.230 |
| Current smoking | 257 (36.4) | 122 (35.9) | 135 (36.8) | 0.803 |
| Coronary heart disease | 123 (17.4) | 60 (17.6) | 63 (17.2) | 0.866 |
| Clinical characteristics | ||||
| Systolic blood pressure, mmHg | 138.5 ± 21.9 | 139.1 ± 21.6 | 137.9 ± 22.2 | 0.501 |
| Diastolic blood pressure, mmHg | 84.3 ± 13.5 | 84.5 ± 13.7 | 84.2 ± 13.5 | 0.767 |
| Baseline NIHSS, score | 14.0 (10.0, 18.0) | 14.0 (10.0, 18.0) | 14.0 (11.0, 18.0) | 0.186 |
| Pre-treatment ASPECTS, score | 9.0 (8.0, 9.0) | 9.0 (8.0, 9.0) | 9.0 (8.0, 9.0) | 0.487 |
| Stroke etiology, n (%) | 0.206 | |||
| Large-artery atherosclerosis | 344 (48.7) | 169 (49.7) | 175 (47.7) | |
| Cardio-embolism | 299 (42.3) | 147 (43.2) | 152 (41.4) | |
| Others/unknown | 64 (9.1) | 24 (7.1) | 40 (10.9) | |
| Poor collateral status, n (%) | 374 (52.9) | 181 (53.2) | 193 (52.6) | 0.863 |
| Occlusive site, n (%) | 0.569 | |||
| Internal carotid artery | 278 (39.3) | 130 (38.2) | 148 (40.3) | |
| Middle cerebral artery | 429 (60.7) | 210 (61.8) | 219 (59.7) | |
| Laboratory data | ||||
| Baseline blood glucose, mmol/L | 7.3 ± 2.4 | 7.2 ± 2.4 | 7.3 ± 2.3 | 0.742 |
| Hs-CRP, mg/L | 11.2 (6.4, 23.2) | 10.9 (6.6, 22.6) | 11.5 (6.0, 23.5) | 0.754 |
| Treatment characteristics | ||||
| Prior tPA treatment, n (%) | 258 (36.5) | 130 (38.2) | 128 (34.9) | 0.354 |
| Onset to groin puncture, min (IQR) | 276.5 (175.0, 433.0) | 285.0 (183.5, 450.5) | 261.0 (169.0, 400.0) | 0.092 |
| Groin puncture to reperfusion, min (IQR) | 60.0 (45.0, 85.0) | 60.0 (45.0, 85.0) | 60.0 (44.0, 89.0) | 0.651 |
| Onset to reperfusion, min (IQR) | 345.0 (242.0, 507.0) | 345.0 (247.0, 531.0) | 347.5 (235.0, 487.0) | 0.186 |
| No. of passes (IQR) | 1.0 (1.0, 2.0) | 1.0 (1.0, 2.0) | 1.0 (1.0, 2.0) | 0.936 |
ASPECTS, the Alberta stroke program early computed tomography score; Hs-CRP, Hyper-sensitive C-reactive protein; NIHSS, National institute of health stroke scale; tPA, Tissue-type plasminogen activator.
3.2. Primary and secondary outcomes by anesthesia type
During the 90-day follow-up, 321 patients (45.4%) experienced a poor functional outcome. Table 2 presented a comparison of the baseline characteristics stratified by functional outcome. Patients with a poor functional outcome (n = 321) were significantly older (75.9 ± 7.1 years vs. 73.4 ± 6.4 years; p = 0.001), had a higher prevalence of hypertension (81.6% vs. 71.8%; p = 0.002) and diabetes mellitus (45.8% vs. 26.4%; p = 0.001), presented with higher baseline NIHSS scores (median, 17.0 vs. 12.0; p = 0.001), lower pre-treatment ASPECTS (median, 9.0 vs. 9.0; p = 0.001), a higher rate of poor collateral status (62.0% vs. 45.3%; p = 0.001), elevated baseline blood glucose (7.9 ± 2.5 mmol/L vs. 6.7 ± 2.1 mmol/L; p = 0.001) and Hs-CRP levels (median, 15.3 mg/L vs. 9.2 mg/L; p = 0.001), required a higher number of EVT passes (2.0 vs. 1.0; p = 0.001), and had lower rates of successful reperfusion (73.8% vs. 92.0%; p = 0.001) compared to patients with favorable functional outcome. They also experienced significantly higher incidences of post-stroke pneumonia (36.4% vs. 29.3%; p = 0.043), sICH (19.9% vs. 4.4%; p = 0.001), and early neurological deterioration (30.2% vs. 8.5%; p = 0.001).
Table 2.
Baseline characteristics stratified by functional outcome.
| Variables | Functional outcome at 90 days | p value | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Good outcome (n = 386) | Poor outcome (n = 321) | ||
| Demographic characteristics | |||
| Age, years | 73.4 ± 6.4 | 75.9 ± 7.1 | 0.001 |
| Male, n (%) | 229 (59.3) | 174 (56.2) | 0.171 |
| Risk factors, n (%) | |||
| Hypertension | 277 (71.8) | 262 (81.6) | 0.002 |
| Diabetes mellitus | 102 (26.4) | 147 (45.8) | 0.001 |
| Hyperlipidemia | 37 (11.5) | 40 (10.4) | 0.621 |
| Current smoking | 109 (34.0) | 148 (38.3) | 0.227 |
| Coronary heart disease | 62 (19.3) | 61 (15.8) | 0.226 |
| Clinical characteristics | |||
| Systolic blood pressure, mmHg | 137.5 ± 21.6 | 139.7 ± 22.3 | 0.168 |
| Diastolic blood pressure, mmHg | 84.8 ± 13.3 | 83.7 ± 13.9 | 0.274 |
| Baseline NIHSS, score | 12.0 (8.0, 14.0) | 17.0 (14.0, 22.0) | 0.001 |
| Pre-treatment ASPECTS, score | 9.0 (8.0, 10.0) | 9.0 (8.0, 9.0) | 0.001 |
| Stroke etiology, n (%) | 0.102 | ||
| Large-artery atherosclerosis | 182 (47.2) | 162 (50.5) | |
| Cardio-embolism | 161 (41.7) | 138 (43.0) | |
| Others/unknown | 43 (11.1) | 21 (6.5) | |
| Poor collateral status, n (%) | 175 (45.3) | 199 (62.0) | 0.001 |
| Occlusive site, n (%) | 0.229 | ||
| Internal carotid artery | 144 (37.3) | 134 (41.7) | |
| Middle cerebral artery | 242 (62.7) | 187 (58.3) | |
| General anesthesia, n (%) | 181 (46.9) | 159 (49.5) | 0.484 |
| Laboratory data | |||
| Baseline blood glucose, mmol/L | 6.7 ± 2.1 | 7.9 ± 2.5 | 0.001 |
| Hs-CRP, mg/L | 9.2 (4.5, 17.2) | 15.3 (8.5, 31.7) | 0.001 |
| Treatment characteristics | |||
| Prior tPA treatment, n (%) | 140 (36.3) | 118 (36.8) | 0.893 |
| Door to groin puncture, min (IQR) | 271.0 (163.0, 441.0) | 285.0 (193.0, 433.0) | 0.145 |
| Onset to groin puncture, min (IQR) | 61.0 (45.0, 85.0) | 60.0 (44.0, 85.0) | 0.725 |
| Groin puncture to reperfusion, min (IQR) | 339.0 (230.0, 510.0) | 357.5 (253.0, 501.0) | 0.715 |
| No. of passes (IQR) | 1.0 (1.0, 2.0) | 2.0 (1.0, 3.0) | 0.001 |
| Successful reperfusion, n (%) | 355 (92.0) | 237 (73.8) | 0.001 |
| Post-stroke pneumonia, n (%) | 113 (29.3) | 117 (36.4) | 0.043 |
| sICH, n (%) | 17 (4.4) | 64 (19.9) | 0.001 |
| Early neurological deterioration, n (%) | 33 (8.5) | 97 (30.2) | 0.001 |
ASPECTS, the Alberta stroke program early computed tomography score; END, Early neurological deterioration; Hs-CRP, Hyper-sensitive C-reactive protein; sICH, Symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage NIHSS, National institute of health stroke scale; tPA, Tissue-type plasminogen activator.
Table 3 displayed the effect of anesthesia choice in procedure-related and clinical outcomes in elderly stroke patients after EVT. The primary outcome was comparable between the GA and non-GA groups (46.8% vs. 44.1%; aOR 1.359, 95% CI 0.913–2.022; p = 0.131).
Table 3.
Outcomes by anesthesia choice in elderly stroke patients receiving mechanical thrombectomy.
| Outcome | General anesthesia | Non-general anesthesia | aOR (95%CI)* | P value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary outcome | ||||
| Good functional outcome at 90 days, No/total No. (%) | 159/340 (46.8) | 162/367 (44.1) | 1.359 (0.913–2.022) | 0.131 |
| Secondary outcomes | ||||
| Successful reperfusion, No/total No. (%) | 295/340 (86.8) | 297/367 (80.9) | 1.372 (0.886–2.125) | 0.157 |
| sICH, No/total No. (%) | 44/340 (12.9) | 37/367 (10.1) | 1.444 (0.835–2.443) | 0.471 |
| Early neurological deterioration, No/total No. (%) | 63/340 (18.5) | 67/367 (18.3) | 0.990 (0.658–1.490) | 0.963 |
| Post-stroke pneumonia, No/total No. (%) | 129/340 (37.9) | 101/367 (27.5) | 1.668 (1.197–2.325) | 0.003 |
| mRS at 90 days, median (IQR) | 2.0 (1.0, 5.0) | 2.0 (1.0, 5.0) | 0.935 (0.721–1.213) | 0.612 |
| Mortality at 90 days, No/total No. (%) | 63/340 (18.5) | 84/367 (21.9) | 0.758 (0.483–1.187) | 0.226 |
CI, confidence interval; aOR, adjusted add ratio.
*adjusted for demographic characteristics, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, baseline NIHSS score, pre-treatment ASPECTS, poor collateral status, No. of passes, levels of baseline blood glucose and Hs-CRP.
Regarding to secondary outcomes, no significant differences were observed in distribution of mRS scores (aOR 0.932, 95% CI 0.721–1.213; p = 0.612; Table 3; Figure 1). No significant differences were found between the groups in the rate of successful reperfusion was not significantly different between the GA and non-GA groups (86.8% vs. 80.9%; aOR 1.372, 95% CI 0.886–2.125; p = 0.157), sICH (12.9% vs. 10.1%; aOR 1.444, 95% CI 0.835–2.443; p = 0.471), END (18.5% vs. 18.3%; aOR 0.990, 95% CI 0.658–1.490; p = 0.963), and mortality at 90 days (18.5% vs. 21.9%; aOR 0.758, 95% CI 0.483–1.187; p = 0.226). However, the risk of post-stroke pneumonia was significantly higher in the GA group compared to the non-GA group (37.9% vs. 27.5%; aOR 1.668, 95% CI 1.197–2.325; p = 0.003). In addition, the association of anesthesia choice with pneumonia risk was similar across subgroups stratified according to age, hypertension, diabetes, admission NIHSS score, and circulation status (Table 4).
Figure 1.
Distribution of 90-day mRS score according to the type of anesthesia. GA, general anesthesia; mRS, modified Rankin Scale.
Table 4.
Subgroup analyses of the association between anesthesia choice and pneumonia risk.
| Variable | OR (95% CI)* | p value |
|---|---|---|
| Age > 75 years | 1.396 (0.840–2.320) | 0.198 |
| Age ≤ 75 years | 1.784 (1.188–2.680) | 0.005 |
| With hypertension | 1.869 (1.299–2.690) | 0.001 |
| Without hypertension | 1.004 (0.511–1.897) | 0.162 |
| With diabetes | 1.957 (1.157–3.309) | 0.012 |
| Without diabetes | 1.430 (1.060–2.131) | 0.049 |
| Baseline NIHSS score > 15 | 1.399 (0.850–2.303) | 0.186 |
| Baseline NIHSS score ≤ 15 | 1.800 (1.190–2.722) | 0.008 |
| Poor circulation status | 1.531 (1.002–2.399) | 0.049 |
| Good circulation status | 1.723 (1.064–2.790) | 0.027 |
CI, confidence interval; OR, add ratio.
*Adjusted for demographic characteristics, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, baseline NIHSS score, pre-treatment ASPECTS, poor collateral status, No. of passes, levels of baseline blood glucose and Hs-CRP, except for the stratified variable.
4. Discussion
In this multicenter, retrospective cohort study of 707 elderly stroke patients undergoing EVT, we found that the choice of anesthesia was not independently associated with a significant difference in the rate of good functional outcome at 90 days. Furthermore, we found no statistically significant differences between the GA and non-GA groups in key secondary outcomes, including successful reperfusion, symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage, early neurological deterioration, mortality, or the overall distribution of mRS scores. However, a significant finding emerged: GA patients had a higher risk of post-stroke pneumonia than non-GA patients.
The impact of anesthesia choice on functional outcomes after thrombectomy remains a subject of debate, as evidenced by multiple randomized trials reporting divergent outcomes (5, 9–11, 24, 25). For instance, one randomized trial and a meta-analysis of 7 trials linked GA to improved functional recovery (9). Conversely, the HERMES collaborative meta-analysis (24) and a large-scale registry study demonstrated that non-GA approaches led to better clinical results (25). By focusing specifically on the elderly patients, our study adds a critical dimension to this evolving consensus. The discrepancy between earlier studies favoring GA and our null finding may be attributed to advancements in anesthetic management protocols for GA (e.g., more stringent blood pressure control) and the improved overall safety profile of EVT procedures over time. Furthermore, it is also plausible that the advanced age and significant comorbidity burden in our cohort obscured any modest treatment benefit that GA might provide in less comorbid populations. In addition, our null findings regarding sICH, mRS score distribution and mortality are consistent with a growing number of contemporary reports (5, 9–11, 26, 27). This reinforces the notion that the technical success and immediate safety of the EVT procedure itself are not predominantly determined by the choice of anesthesia in experienced centers.
It was observed in our study that GA elevated the risk of post-stroke pneumonia among elderly patients following EVT. This finding corroborates earlier studies that identified a similar association in the general population (11, 26, 27). This observation is biologically plausible and can be explained by several interconnected mechanisms. Firstly, endotracheal intubation and impaired airway protection are hallmarks of GA. The placement of an endotracheal tube can bypass natural airway defenses, potentially introducing pathogens into the lower airways (28). Moreover, neuromuscular blocking agents used in GA compromise the cough and gag reflexes-essential protective mechanisms against aspiration. Residual sedative effects after extubation can further prolong this period of vulnerability (29). Secondly, GA is known to induce immunomodulation and suppress both innate and adaptive immunity (30). Volatile anesthetics and intravenous sedatives can inhibit the function of neutrophils, macrophages, and lymphocytes, reducing the body’s ability to combat inhaled or aspirated pathogens (31). This state of immunoparalysis may be particularly detrimental in elderly stroke patients, who often experience stroke-induced immunodepression and therefore face a significantly elevated pneumonia risk. Thirdly, hemodynamic instability associated with GA may be a contributing factor. Hypotension, which is common during the induction and maintenance of GA, can cause cerebral and systemic hypoperfusion. In stroke patients, this may enlarge the ischemic penumbra and exacerbate swallowing dysfunction while also depressing the level of consciousness, thereby elevating the risk of aspiration pneumonia (32, 33). Finally, the marginally longer onset to groon puncture time observed in the GA group, though not statistically significant in our study (p = 0.092), aligns with known logistical challenges of administering GA (e.g., time for anesthesia team assembly and intubation). This delay could potentially prolong the duration of dysphagia and immobility, further predisposing patients to pulmonary complications. However, it is important to note that previous studies have not consistently demonstrated a significant difference in onset-to-groin puncture time between GA and non-GA groups (34, 35). The slight trend observed in our cohort may be attributable to differences in study population characteristics, institutional protocols, or the stage of the learning curve during the study period.
Several limitations of our study warrant consideration. First, its retrospective and non-randomized design introduces the potential for residual confounding, despite our comprehensive multivariate adjustments. The choice of anesthesia was at the discretion of the treating team, which may have been influenced by unmeasured patient-level factors (e.g., baseline agitation or respiratory status). Second, we lacked detailed data on specific anesthetic agents, dosages, and intraoperative hemodynamic parameters, which could influence the clinical outcomes. Third, the diagnosis of pneumonia, while based on standardized criteria, may be subject to variation in clinical practice across centers. Finally, the generalizability of our findings is confined to elderly stroke populations.
In conclusion, this multicenter study of elderly stroke patients undergoing EVT found that the type of anesthesia was not independently associated with 90-day functional outcomes, reperfusion success, hemorrhage, or mortality. However, GA significantly increased the risk of post-stroke pneumonia. Therefore, non-GA should be prioritized when feasible, particularly for patients at high risk of pulmonary complications, with the final strategy determined through individualized interdisciplinary assessment.
Funding Statement
The author(s) declared that financial support was received for this work and/or its publication. This study was supported in part by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 82302456).
Footnotes
Edited by: Koji Tanaka, Fujita Health University, Japan
Reviewed by: Jacopo Scaggiante, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli - IRCCS, Italy
Vincenzo Pota, University of Campania Luigi Vanvitelli, Italy
Data availability statement
The raw data supporting the conclusions of this article will be made available by the authors, without undue reservation.
Ethics statement
The studies involving humans were approved by the institutional review boards of Suzhou Ninth People’s Hospital, Nanjing First Hospital, The First Hospital of Anhui University of Science and Technology, Suzhou Xiangcheng People’s Hospital, and The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University. The studies were conducted in accordance with the local legislation and institutional requirements. The ethics committee/institutional review board waived the requirement of written informed consent for participation from the participants or the participants’ legal guardians/next of kin because this is retrospective study.
Author contributions
WS: Data curation, Methodology, Investigation, Conceptualization, Formal analysis, Writing – original draft. MX: Data curation, Conceptualization, Investigation, Writing – original draft, Formal analysis. XG: Formal analysis, Writing – original draft, Data curation, Supervision, Methodology. YX: Investigation, Methodology, Formal analysis, Writing – original draft. XZ: Investigation, Writing – original draft, Resources, Validation, Visualization, Formal analysis, Data curation. EY: Data curation, Writing – original draft, Project administration, Software, Resources. HZ: Formal analysis, Supervision, Writing – original draft, Methodology, Validation, Software. YL: Writing – original draft, Software, Writing – review & editing, Funding acquisition, Conceptualization, Investigation, Formal analysis, Supervision. LX: Software, Resources, Writing – review & editing, Conceptualization, Formal analysis, Methodology, Writing – original draft, Data curation, Visualization, Validation.
Conflict of interest
The author(s) declared that this work was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Generative AI statement
The author(s) declared that Generative AI was not used in the creation of this manuscript.
Any alternative text (alt text) provided alongside figures in this article has been generated by Frontiers with the support of artificial intelligence and reasonable efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, including review by the authors wherever possible. If you identify any issues, please contact us.
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
References
- 1.Ji C, Ge X, Zhang J, Tong H. The stroke burden in China and its long-term trends: insights from the global burden of disease (GBD) study 1990-2021. Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis. (2025) 35:103848. doi: 10.1016/j.numecd.2025.103848, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.GBD 2019 Stroke Collaborators . Global, regional, and national burden of stroke and its risk factors, 1990–2019: a systematic analysis for the global burden of disease study 2019. Lancet Neurol. (2021) 20:795–820. doi: 10.1186/s40001-025-03710-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Goyal M, Menon B, vZ WH, Dippel D, Mitchell P, Demchuk A, et al. Endovascular thrombectomy after large-vessel ischaemic stroke: a meta-analysis of individual patient data from five randomised trials. Lancet. (2016) 387:1723–31. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)00163-X [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Cappellari M, Pracucci G, Forlivesi S, Saia V, Nappini S, Nencini P, et al. General Anesthesia versus conscious sedation and local Anesthesia during thrombectomy for acute ischemic stroke. Stroke. (2020) 51:2036–44. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.120.028963, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Butt W, Dhillon P, Podlasek A, Malik L, Nair S, Hewson D, et al. Local anesthesia as a distinct comparator versus conscious sedation and general anesthesia in endovascular stroke treatment: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Neurointerv Surg. (2022) 14:221–6. doi: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2021-017360, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Schönenberger S, Uhlmann L, Hacke W, Schieber S, Mundiyanapurath S, Purrucker J, et al. Effect of conscious sedation vs general anesthesia on early neurological improvement among patients with ischemic stroke undergoing endovascular thrombectomy: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA. (2016) 316:1986–96. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.16623, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Hassan A, Chaudhry S, Zacharatos H, Khatri R, Akbar U, Suri M, et al. Increased rate of aspiration pneumonia and poor discharge outcome among acute ischemic stroke patients following intubation for endovascular treatment. Neurocrit Care. (2012) 16:246–50. doi: 10.1007/s12028-011-9638-0, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Tosello R, Riera R, Tosello G, Clezar C, Amorim J, Vasconcelos V, et al. Type of anaesthesia for acute ischaemic stroke endovascular treatment. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. (2022) 7:CD013690. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013690.pub2, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Campbell D, Butler E, Campbell R, Ho J, Barber P. General Anesthesia compared with non-GA in endovascular thrombectomy for ischemic stroke: a systematic review and Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Neurology. (2023) 100:e1655–63. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000207066, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Schönenberger S, Hendén P, Simonsen C, Uhlmann L, Klose C, Pfaff J, et al. Association of general anesthesia vs procedural sedation with functional outcome among patients with acute ischemic stroke undergoing thrombectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA. (2019) 322:1283–93. doi: 10.1001/jama.2019.11455, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Jia Y, Feng Y, Ma Y, Feng G, Xu N, Li M, et al. Type of anesthesia for endovascular therapy in acute ischemic stroke: a literature review and meta-analysis. Int J Stroke. (2024) 19:735–46. doi: 10.1177/17474930241228956, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Vinay B, Manohara N, Jain A. Anesthesia considerations in older adults undergoing emergency mechanical thrombectomy for acute ischaemic stroke. Drugs Aging. (2025) 42:1011–43. doi: 10.1007/s40266-025-01246-w, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Barber P, Demchuk A, Zhang J, Buchan A. Validity and reliability of a quantitative computed tomography score in predicting outcome of hyperacute stroke before thrombolytic therapy. ASPECTS study group. Alberta stroke programme early CT score. Lancet. (2000) 355:1670–4. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(00)02237-6, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Adams HJ, Bendixen B, Kappelle L, Biller J, Love B, Gordon D, et al. Classification of subtype of acute ischemic stroke. Definitions for use in a multicenter clinical trial. TOAST. Trial of org 10172 in acute stroke treatment. Stroke. (1993) 24:35–41. doi: 10.1161/01.str.24.1.35 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Zaidat O, Yoo A, Khatri P, Tomsick T, von KR, Saver J, et al. Recommendations on angiographic revascularization grading standards for acute ischemic stroke: a consensus statement. Stroke. (2013) 44:2650–63. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.113.001972 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Zhang X, Yuan K, Wang H, Gong P, Jiang T, Xie Y, et al. Nomogram to predict mortality of endovascular thrombectomy for ischemic stroke despite successful recanalization. J Am Heart Assoc. (2020) 9:e014899. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.119.014899, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Zhang X, Xie Y, Wang H, Yang D, Jiang T, Yuan K, et al. Symptomatic intracranial Hemorrhage after mechanical thrombectomy in Chinese ischemic stroke patients: the ASIAN score. Stroke. (2020) 51:2690–6. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.120.030173, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.von Kummer R, Broderick JP, Campbell BC, Demchuk A, Goyal M, Hill MD, et al. The Heidelberg bleeding classification: classification of bleeding events after ischemic stroke and reperfusion therapy. Stroke. (2015) 46:2981–6. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.115.010049, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Hao Y, Yang D, Wang H, Zi W, Zhang M, Geng Y, et al. Predictors for symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage after endovascular treatment of acute ischemic stroke. Stroke. (2017) 48:1203–9. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.116.016368, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Seners P, Ben Hassen W, Lapergue B, Arquizan C, Heldner MR, Henon H, et al. Prediction of early neurological deterioration in individuals with Minor stroke and large vessel occlusion intended for intravenous thrombolysis alone. JAMA Neurol. (2021) 78:321–8. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2020.4557, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Heitkamp C, Winkelmeier L, Heit J, Albers G, Lansberg M, Kniep H, et al. Early neurological deterioration in patients with acute ischemic stroke is linked to unfavorable cerebral venous outflow. Eur Stroke J. (2024) 9:162–71. doi: 10.1177/23969873231208277, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.E Y, Deng Q, Shi G, Li Z, Liu C, Wang S, et al. The association between high mobility group box 1 and stroke-associated pneumonia in acute ischemic stroke patients. Brain Sci. (2022) 12:1580. doi: 10.3390/brainsci12111580, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Smith C, Kishore A, Vail A, Chamorro A, Garau J, Hopkins S, et al. Diagnosis of stroke-associated pneumonia: recommendations from the pneumonia in stroke consensus group. Stroke. (2015) 46:2335–40. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.115.009617, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Campbell B, van Zwam WH, Goyal M, Menon B, Dippel D, Demchuk A, et al. Effect of general anaesthesia on functional outcome in patients with anterior circulation ischaemic stroke having endovascular thrombectomy versus standard care: a meta-analysis of individual patient data. Lancet Neurol. (2018) 17:47–53. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(17)30407-6, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Berkhemer O, van den Berg LA, Fransen P, Beumer D, Yoo A, Lingsma H, et al. The effect of anesthetic management during intra-arterial therapy for acute stroke in MR CLEAN. Neurology. (2016) 87:656–64. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000002976 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Peng Z, Luo W, Yan Z, Zhang H. The effect of general anesthesia and conscious sedation in endovascular thrombectomy for acute ischemic stroke: an updated meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials and trial sequential analysis. Front Neurol. (2023) 14:1291211. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2023.1291211, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Lu Y, Xu P, Wang J, Xiao L, Zhang P, Duan Z, et al. General anesthesia vs. non-general anesthesia for vertebrobasilar stroke endovascular therapy. Front Neurol. (2023) 14:1104487. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2023.1104487, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Long B, Gottlieb M. Emergency medicine updates: endotracheal intubation. Am J Emerg Med. (2024) 85:108–16. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2024.08.042, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Li J, Yin Q, Xun X, He J, Yu D, Wang Z, et al. The effect of intraoperative dexmedetomidine on cognitive dysfunction after surgery: a updated meta-analysis. J Cardiothorac Surg. (2021) 16:351. doi: 10.1186/s13019-021-01736-z, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Stollings LM, Jia LJ, Tang P, Dou H, Lu B, Xu Y. Immune modulation by volatile Anesthetics. Anesthesiology. (2016) 125:399–411. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000001195, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Yuki K, Eckenhoff R. Mechanisms of the immunological effects of volatile Anesthetics: a review. Anesth Analg. (2016) 123:326–35. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000001403, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Jor O, Maca J, Koutna J, Gemrotova M, Vymazal T, Litschmannova M, et al. Hypotension after induction of general anesthesia: occurrence, risk factors, and therapy. A prospective multicentre observational study. J Anesth. (2018) 32:673–80. doi: 10.1007/s00540-018-2532-6, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Abdali K, Chen X, Ross S, Davis S, Zhou Z, Mallet R, et al. Mechanisms maintaining cerebral perfusion during systemic hypotension are impaired in elderly adults. Exp Biol Med (Maywood). (2023) 248:2464–72. doi: 10.1177/15353702231209416, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Löwhagen Hendén P, Rentzos A, Karlsson JE, Rosengren L, Leiram B, Sundeman H, et al. General Anesthesia versus conscious sedation for endovascular treatment of acute ischemic stroke: the AnStroke trial (Anesthesia during stroke). Stroke. (2017) 48:1601–7. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.117.016554, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Chen PR, Artime CA, Sheth SA, Pedroza C, Ortega-Gutierrez S, Wolfe S, et al. Sedation vs general anesthesia for endovascular therapy in acute ischemic stroke: the SEGA randomized clinical trial. JAMA Neurol. (2025) 82:1265–73. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2025.3775, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Data Availability Statement
The raw data supporting the conclusions of this article will be made available by the authors, without undue reservation.