Skip to main content
Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy logoLink to Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy
. 2026 Mar 17;81(4):dkag097. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkag097

The pharmacodynamics of polymyxin B in Acinetobacter baumannii in murine thigh and lung infection models

Sanne van den Berg 1,2, Michel Pieren 3, Sebastiaan D T Sassen 4,5, Willem A M de Jong 6, Catharina S C Boonman 7, Glenn E Dale 8, Anouk E Muller 9,10,11,✉
PMCID: PMC13017451  PMID: 41843493

Abstract

Objectives

Polymyxin B has been used for many years to treat Acinetobacter baumannii, but little is known about its pharmacodynamics (PD). We aimed to describe the PD of polymyxin B in treating A. baumannii infections.

Methods

Using the murine neutropenic thigh and lung infection models we determined the magnitude of the pharmacokinetic (PK)/PD index correlating with efficacy for eight A. baumannii strains. PD was analysed using the Emax model to determine PD targets. Using published human PK data the PTAs were calculated.

Results

In the thigh infection model, stasis, 1-log10 and 2-log10 kill were reached for all strains. Median (range) fAUC/MIC (area under the unbound concentration–time curve divided by the MIC) targets for stasis, 1-log10 kill and 2-log10 kill were 2.1 (1.0–11), 2.9 (1.0–15) and 4.0 (1.1–20), respectively. In contrast, in the lung model, 2-log10 kill was reached in 2/8 strains only, and there was insufficient killing at tolerated exposures to determine PD fAUC/MIC targets. For the standard human dosing regimen, PTAs derived from the thigh model were inadequate at the USCAST (United States Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing) clinical breakpoint and a protein binding of 90%.

Conclusions

Whereas polymyxin B treatment had good efficacy in the murine thigh infection model, in the lung infection model its effect was limited. PD targets, with MICs of circulating A. baumannii isolates of ≤2 mg/L, are not reached with a standard human dosing regimen and will probably exceed threshold values for toxicity. These data suggest that the efficacy of polymyxin B as monotherapy for A. baumannii infections is questionable.

Introduction

Acinetobacter baumannii, especially carbapenem-resistant isolates (CRAB), is an emerging cause of healthcare-associated infections. This is a significant threat to public health. The development of new antibiotics, repurposing of drugs approved for other pathogens, and dose optimization of disused antibiotics are crucial for treating CRAB infections in the future.

The polymyxins are an old class of antibiotics used to treat Gram-negative bacterial infections, including those caused by A. baumannii. This class includes polymyxin B, a compound that is administered IV in its active form. As polymyxin B was discovered in the 1940s,1 it was introduced to the market without solid pharmacokinetic (PK) and pharmacodynamic (PD) knowledge. Despite the urgent need for antibiotics active against Gram-negative pathogens, the use of polymyxin B was limited due to toxicity issues, mainly nephrotoxicity and neurotoxicity.2 Information on PK and PD is crucial in navigating the delicate balance between efficacy and toxicity.

Limited data are available on the PD of polymyxin B. Previous studies in murine infection models indicated that the PK/PD index best correlated with antibacterial efficacy is the ‘area under the unbound concentration–time curve divided by the MIC’ (fAUC/MIC).3,4 However, these studies were performed using Klebsiella pneumoniae and Escherichia coli strains. The magnitude of the PK/PD index correlated with a certain antibacterial effect was quite variable in these studies. For K. pneumoniae, the magnitude of the fAUC/MIC for a static effect was found to be 1.2–60.6,3,4 whereas for E. coli the static fAUC/MIC range was 27.5–102.6 in the thigh infection model.4 In the study of Landersdorfer et al.,3 a 1-log10 kill effect was reached in the three tested K. pneumoniae strains; this was reached in only one of four strains of the study of Van der Meijden et al.4 In both studies a 2-log10 kill effect was not achieved. This indicates that the antibacterial effect of polymyxin B may differ between species, and the overall effect may be limited. Especially in lung infections, the effect may be reduced by a structure-interaction between the polymyxins and lung surfactant or binding to mucin.5,6 Knowledge of the (magnitude of the) PK/PD index for A. baumannii is therefore required to optimize human dosing regimens used to treat A. baumannii infections. In the current study, the murine plasma PK of polymyxin B, as well as the subsequent plasma exposures, were determined in A. baumannii-infected mice. These exposures were subsequently correlated to the antibacterial effect against eight different A. baumannii strains to determine the PK/PD index and its magnitude required for various levels of killing in two murine infection models.

Materials and methods

Bacteria, media and antibiotics

Eight A. baumannii strains, all with polymyxin B MICs of 0.5 mg/L, were used for these studies. Except for BV566, all other strains were carbapenem resistant (CR). Isolates were grown, subcultured and quantified using CAMHB II (BioTrading Benelux B.V., Mijdrecht, The Netherlands) and Mueller–Hinton II agar (MHA; BD Benelux N.V., Erembodegem, Belgie). Polymyxin B sulphate (lot A1421526, Xellia Pharmaceuticals, Copenhagen, Denmark), consisting of 71% B1 and 22% B2, was dissolved in 0.9% physiological saline solution (Baxter Healthcare SA, Zurich, Switzerland). Solutions were freshly prepared on the day of the experiment.

Neutropenic murine thigh and lung infection models

All studies in experimental animals were carried out in accordance with the EU Animal Directive 2010/63/EU 2010 directive7 as described before,4 with approval of the institutional Animal Welfare Body (IRN 2022-0004). Female outbred CD-1 mice, specified pathogen free, obtained from Charles River Germany, mean ± SD weight of 24.8 ± 1.7 g, 7–8 weeks old, were used. Animals were socially housed under standard conditions with drink and feed supplied ad libitum, and were randomly assigned to the experimental groups by an analyst who was blinded to the study details. There was no control for potential confounders and researchers were not blinded.

Neutropenia was induced by intraperitoneal cyclophosphamide injections at 4 days (150 mg/kg) and 1 day (100 mg/kg) before infection. For infection, an overnight A. baumannii culture was diluted in fresh CAMHB, incubated for 1 h at 37°C, and further diluted in CAMHB (for thigh infection) or saline (for lung infection) to obtain an inoculum of ∼4 × 106 and 2 × 108 cfu/mL, for thigh and lung infection, respectively. For thigh infection, mice were infected intramuscularly in each thigh (0.05 mL). For lung infection, isoflurane anaesthetized mice were infected intranasally (0.05 mL). Infections were induced at t = −2 h, corresponding to 2 h before treatment initiation. Buprenorphine (subcutaneously, every 12 h starting at infection) was applied as analgesia. The health status of mice (including weight, temperature, colour of eyes, ruffled fur, hunched back) was checked at least twice daily.

Polymyxin B pharmacokinetics

Two hours after thigh infection with A. baumannii BV378, polymyxin B was subcutaneously administered (0.1 mL) in a range between 2 and 64 mg/kg, with two mice per group. Group size was based on results of previous studies.3,4 At 12 different timepoints, blood was collected in K3E EDTA tubes (Sarstedt, Nümbrecht, Germany) under isoflurane anaesthesia through orbital sinus bleeding, which was immediately followed by cervical dislocation. Samples were placed on ice. Immediately after blood collection, bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) was performed. The trachea was exposed by a ventral vertical incision in the neck and a cannula was inserted. Lungs were instilled two times with 1 mL of sterile saline, and the bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALf) was recovered and pooled.

After plasma and BALf collection, the samples were decontaminated. For plasma, precipitation agent (acetonitrile + 2% acetic acid + 0.2% heptafluorbutyric acid) was added in a ratio of 1:2. Samples were vortexed, and incubated for 10 min at room temperature, followed by precipitation by centrifuging at 8500 rpm for 10 min at 20°C. Supernatant was stored at −80°C. For BALf, precipitation agent was added in a ratio of 1:2. Samples were incubated for 10 min at room temperature before storage at −80°C.

Determination of polymyxin B1 and B2 levels

Polymyxin B concentrations in plasma and BALf were determined by a validated HPLC method at Pharmacelcus GmbH (Germany), with a lower limit of quantification (LOQ) of 0.0463 mg/L for polymyxin B2 in plasma and 0.0746 mg/L for plasma and BALf for polymyxin B1. For the analysis the HPLC system consisted of a Vanquish quaternary pump and a Vanquish split sampler (Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA). MS was performed on a Q-Exactive Plus mass spectrometer (Orbitrap™ technology with accurate mass) equipped with a heated electrospray interface (H-ESI) (Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA). The H-ESI was running in positive mode. Data were processed using the software Chromeleon version 7.2.10 ES MUf. The pump flow rate was set to 600 µL/min and the analytes were separated on a Synergy Polar RP Column, 2.5 μm 30 × 2.0 mm (Phenomenex, Germany). The HPLC was performed in the gradient mode using acetonitrile + 0.1% formic acid (A) as organic phase and water + 0.1% formic acid (B) as aqueous phase.

Pharmacokinetic modelling

A population PK model was developed using non-linear mixed-effects modelling (NONMEM, version 7.4.4, ICON Development Solutions, Ellicott City, MD, USA). The analysis was performed using the FOCE method with INTERACTION on logarithmically transformed concentrations. Concentrations of polymyxin B were based on the sum of the B1 and B2 components. Below LOQ and zero values of summed concentrations were excluded from the analysis. Parameters were calculated for a virtual 1 kg mouse, resulting in PK parameters corresponding to a per kilogram base.

A structural model was developed, using one- and two-compartment models. The absorption following subcutaneous injections was described using an absorption rate constant (ka). Typical values for central (Vc) and peripheral volume of distribution (Vp), clearance (CL) and intercompartmental clearance (Q) were estimated. As bioavailability (F) could not be estimated, the PK parameter values corresponded to the ratios, such as CL/F and V/F. Addition of interindividual variability (IIV), described using an exponential model, was evaluated for each PK parameter. Residual variability was described using an additive error model for logarithmically transformed data. Minimum objective function values, parameter precision, error estimates and visual inspection of the goodness-of-fit plots were considered for model selection. The CIs around the final parameters were estimated by bootstrap with resampling (n = 500), and fit to the data was evaluated using visual predictive checks (VPCs) and VPCs stratified for dose (n = 500).

To calculate the unbound exposure in terms of fAUC0–24h/MIC an unbound fraction of 20% was used in the simulations, as reported earlier for polymyxin B in murine plasma.4

Polymyxin B pharmacodynamics

Dose–response studies were performed for eight A. baumannii strains in both the thigh and lung infection models. Two hours after infection, treatment with polymyxin B [1–32 mg/kg every 12 h; total daily dose (TDD) 2–64 mg/kg] was administered subcutaneously over 24 h with three mice per dose level. Controls received the same volume of saline. Group size was based on results of previous studies.3,4 At start of treatment (t = 0), three mice were humanely killed to determine the bacterial load in each thigh or in lungs. All animals were humanely killed 24 h (t = 24 h) after the first dose, unless the welfare of the animals necessitated earlier termination, following animal welfare regulations. Thighs or lungs were aseptically removed, and homogenized in a gentleMACS M tube containing 2 mL PBS, using GentleMACS Dissociator (Miltenyi Biotec, Leiden, The Netherlands). A 10-fold dilution series was prepared and three drops of 10 µL were plated per dilution on MHA; these were incubated at 37°C for 16–18 h. Colonies were counted and the cfu per thigh or lung was calculated.

The drug effect was determined by the difference between the log10 cfu values at t = 0 (mean of three mice) and t = 24 h (value of individual mice) expressed as Δlog10 cfu. Using the Emax model with variable slope (GraphPad Prism version 9.5.1, USA), the fAUC/MIC values required for a static, 1-log10 and 2-log10 kill effect were determined.

PTA in humans

The PTA for a dosing regimen of 200 mg every 24 h in hospitalized patients was determined using a previously published population PK model.8 The model used was based on therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) samples taken from hospitalized patients treated for various types of infections.8 Monte Carlo simulation was used to estimate the fAUCs of 5000 patients taking into account a protein binding of 50% and 90% to represent the different values reported in literature (MicLab 2.71, Medimatics, The Netherlands).9–12 The PTA was calculated for isolates with polymyxin B MICs ranging from 0.25 to 8 mg/L.

Results

Polymyxin B pharmacokinetics

The PK profile of polymyxin B (B1 and B2 measured separately) in mouse plasma after single subcutaneous administration of 2–64 mg/kg is shown in Figure S1 (available as Supplementary data at JAC Online). The total peak plasma levels ranged from 1900 to 60 000 mg/L and 400 to 13 100 mg/L, for polymyxin B1 and polymyxin B2, respectively. The 64 mg/kg dose was not well tolerated, and mice in this group were terminated no later than after 2.25 h. Polymyxin B was not detectable in BALf.

Pharmacokinetic modelling

A total of 136 polymyxin B1 concentrations (including 17 below LOQ) and polymyxin B2 concentrations (including 3 below LOQ) were available for the analysis. The PK profile was described by a one-compartment model with an additional absorption compartment. Inclusion of IIV on CL and V improved the model fit. The goodness-of-fit plots showed no large bias and the residuals were within the normal range (−2, 2). Relative standard error (RSE) values were within an acceptable range. Shrinkages remained high on CL and residual error. The estimates of the final model are presented in Table 1. The robustness of the model was tested via bootstrap (n = 500). A total of 295 successful runs were performed (37 were terminated during minimization and 168 due to boundary issues). The estimates of the bootstrap showed that the parameters were well estimated (Table 1). The VPC showed that the model provided an adequate fit overall and for most dosing regimens—except the highest, not tolerated, dose (64 mg/kg) (Figure S2).

Table 1.

Parameter estimates of the final model and bootstrap

Parameter Estimation RSE, % Shrinkage, % 95% CI Bootstrap, median (2.5%–97.5%)
k a, h−1 7.57 35.3 2.33–12.80 7.59 (3.93–17.89)
V c, L/kg/F 1.64 7 1.42–1.87 1.62 (1.38–1.90)
CL, L/kg/h/F 0.27 9 0.23–0.32 0.27 (0.22–0.33)
IIV CL 32.6% 28.2 66 30.7% (10–49.9%)
IIV V 64.8% 57.7 19 61.4 (24.4–79.0%)
Additive error 0.27 47.1 51 0.021–0.52 0.26 (0.003–0.54)

CL, clearance; IIV, interindividual variability; ka, absorption coefficient; RSE, relative standard error; Vc, central volume of distribution.

Polymyxin B exposure response

The average bacterial burden at the start of the treatment (t = 0) was 1.9 × 106 cfu/thigh (range: 6.5–72 × 105 cfu/thigh) and 8.0 × 106 cfu/lung (range: 1.8–22 × 106 cfu/lung). Polymyxin B doses of 64 mg/kg were not tolerated. The exposure–response curves for the thigh model are shown in Figure 1. A static, 1-log10 kill and 2-log10 kill effects were found for all eight A. baumannii strains. In contrast, in the lung infection model (Figure 2), a 2-log10 kill effect was achieved in only 2/8 A. baumannii strains (BV378 and BV558). The exposure–response relationships of the eight strains were well described in the thigh infection model by the Emax model (R2 = 0.6598–0.8514). The fAUC/MIC values correlating with static, 1-log10 and 2-log10 kill effects for the individual strains in the thigh infection model are presented in Table 2. In contrast, in the lung infection model (Figure 2), a 2-log10 kill effect was achieved in only 2/8 A. baumannii strains (BV378 and BV558). The model fit was generally poor with low R2 values (0.1657–0.6207). The static, 1-log10 kill and 2-log10 kill targets were reached only in a minority of strains and therefore were unreliable (Table S1).

Figure 1.

For image description, please refer to the figure legend and surrounding text.

Exposure–response analysis of polymyxin B in the murine thigh infection model for eight A. baumannii strains. Neutropenic, thigh-infected mice received polymyxin B every 12 h. The drug effect (Δlog10 cfu) is the difference between log10 cfu values at t = 0 and t = 24 h. The controls represent mice not exposed to polymyxin B (set to 1).

Figure 2.

For image description, please refer to the figure legend and surrounding text.

Exposure–response analysis of polymyxin B in the murine lung infection model for eight A. baumannii strains. Neutropenic, lung-infected mice received polymyxin B every 12 h. The drug effect (Δlog10 cfu) is the difference between log10 cfu values at t = 0 and t = 24 h. The controls represent mice not exposed to polymyxin B (set to 1).

Table 2.

Targets (fAUC/MIC) of polymyxin B in the murine thigh infection model

A. baumannii strain Thigh infection model
Stasis 1-log10 kill 2-log10 kill
BV378 2.1 2.8 3.8
BV556 11 15 20
BV557 1.1 1.4 1.8
BV558 2.2 3.0 4.2
BV559 2.5 4.0 6.2
BV562 1.0 1.0 1.1
BV565 4.9 7.0 12
BV566 1.3 1.6 2.9
Median 2.2 2.9 4.0
Mean 3.3 4.5 6.5
SD 3.4 4.7 6.4

PTA in humans

The PTAs for the 100, 150 and 200 mg clinical dose every 24 h (Figure 3) were performed taking into account a protein binding of 50% or 90%, as reported values for human protein binding in literature showed a wide range.9–12 In addition, the PK/PD target for the thigh infection model (median fAUC/MIC for 1-log10 kill of 2.9) was analysed. For a TDD of 100 mg and an MIC of 1 mg/L, or for a TDD of 200 mg and an MIC of 2 mg/L, the PTA using the PK/PD target derived from the thigh infection model was >95%, taking into account the low protein binding of 50%. The values for the PTA are shown in Table S2.

Figure 3.

For image description, please refer to the figure legend and surrounding text.

PTA in human plasma for the 100 mg (a), 150 mg (b) and 200 mg (c) TDD dosing regimen for the thigh model and 50% as well as 90% protein binding.

Discussion

To determine efficacy of polymyxin B in A. baumannii infections, the PD of polymyxin B was studied in A. baumannii murine thigh and lung infection models using eight strains. In the thigh infection model, median fAUC/MIC values of 2.2, 2.9 and 4.0 were required to achieve stasis, 1-log10 kill and 2-log10 kill, respectively. In contrast, in the lung infection model there was insufficient killing to determine PD fAUC/MIC targets. Higher exposures in the murine infection model were not possible due to toxicity. For the PK/PD target derived from the thigh infection model and a protein binding of 90%,8,11 a PTA of >95% was reached only for strains with MICs up to 1 mg/L, indicating that current dosing regimens may be suboptimal in hospitalized patients.

Polymyxin B is a mixture of structurally related polypeptides, including the major components B1 and B2.13 The murine plasma PK of polymyxin B determined in the thigh infection model was based on these two major components, B1 and B2. As the lung infection model is more distressing for the animals, and we have shown previously that there is no difference in the PK between the two infection types for polymyxin B, we studied here PK only in the A. baumannii thigh-infected mice. Polymyxin B consists of more components than only B1 and B2; however, these two are the main components. Furthermore, methods used in clinical practice usually only include the B1 and B2 components.14,15 To be able to use the preclinically determined PK/PD targets in clinical practice, the method used to measure the polymyxin B concentrations should match those used to measure concentrations in human studies as well as those performed in clinical practice for TDM.

In the population PK analysis of our data, some saturation seemed to occur at higher dosages, probably in the absorption phase (16 mg/kg and up). As the 64 mg/kg doses were not tolerated, only concentrations up to 2 h after the start of treatment were available. This dose level could therefore not be adequately analysed. Excluding the concentrations of the 64 mg/kg group from the analysis did not affect Vc and CL estimates much: 1.64 versus 1.58 L/kg/F and 0.273 versus 0.265 L/kg/h/F. It did, however, affect the ka and constant error, 0.27 versus 0.45, for, respectively, the model with and without the 64 mg/kg dosing regimen. The IIV decreased as well. We therefore accepted the final model with the 64 mg/kg concentration–time data. Landersdorfer et al.3 identified also a saturable absorption and a linear plus saturable elimination in the 16 and 32 mg/kg groups. In line with our analysis, the PK analysis of Jiao et al.16 did not improve after inclusion of a saturated clearance. Furthermore, both the high shrinkage and the low percentage of successful bootstraps run are caused because these data are scarce and taken from mice. It is possible to take only one sample per mouse, and the total number of animals used is limited for ethical reasons. This was taken into account in the inspection of both goodness-of-fit and VPC plots.

In the present study, a remarkable difference was found between the bacterial killing in the thigh and lung infection models. The PD targets associated with stasis, 1-log10 and 2-log10 kill in the murine thigh infection model were much lower compared with the limited killing observed in the murine lung infection model. This is in line with a previous study where PK/PD of colistin was explored in both the murine thigh and lung infection models. The response in the A. baumannii lung-infected mice was smaller as well.17 The structural similarity of polymyxin B and colistin may explain why this difference in infection models is observed for both compounds. This difference might be due to poor penetration of the polymyxins, as in our study polymyxin B concentrations in the BALf were not detectable. However, these findings contrast with the study of Jiao et al.16 in immunocompetent mice, in which BALf concentrations were detectable.

A limitation of the present study was that the MIC value from all A. baumannii isolates was 0.5 mg/L. As the current study is part of a project in which the efficacy of polymyxin B in combination with another compound is studied, the selection of strains was mainly based on MIC differences for the combination compound, rather than on differences in the polymyxin B MIC. In a study in 217 CRAB isolates, the polymyxin B MIC50 was 0.5 mg/L,18 and in a surveillance study the MIC50 of 2621 Acinetobacter spp. was found to be ≤1 mg/L.19 This shows that the MIC value of 0.5 mg/L is a frequently determined value for A. baumannii, and thus clinically relevant. Although the median MIC values for the strains were the same, there is considerable variability in the PD targets attributed to uncharacterized factors independent of the MIC.

The interpretation of the PD targets found in our study is limited by the limited breakpoints or distributions available. In the current breakpoint table of the EUCAST there are no breakpoints for polymyxin B. However, the United States Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (USCAST) has a susceptibility breakpoint for A. baumannii of S ≤2 mg/L. The breakpoints are not valid for respiratory tract infections or lower urinary tract infections, and it is recommended that the dosing regimen of 2.5 mg/kg/day should be combined with a second agent whenever possible.20 The USCAST recommendation that the breakpoint is not valid in respiratory tract infections is in line with the limited killing found in the murine lung infection model.

Although polymyxin B is currently being used as monotherapy in the treatment of A. baumannii infections, our study shows that its activity may be limited due to a low PTA, taking into account the USCAST breakpoint of 2 mg/L and a protein binding of 90%.11,20 The low values for the PTA were in line with the low PTA found previously in the murine thigh infection model for E. coli and K. pneumoniae.4 Since (nephro)toxicity of polymyxin B has been shown to be dependent on the plasma AUC, it might not be possible to increase dosing regimens.21 Values from 100 mg·h/L for the (total) AUC at steady state 24 h are associated with toxicity.22,23 Reported values for the protein binding in human plasma are variable, but values >90% are reported.24 Considering a protein binding of 90% in human plasma, an AUC of 100 mg·h/L translates to an fAUC of 10 mg·h/L. With MIC values of the circulating A. baumannii isolates of up to 2 mg/L, the fAUC/MIC values needed for efficacy will exceed the threshold values for toxicity.25 Using polymyxin B in combination with a second antibiotic may be a solution to preserve this drug for the future. One of the advantages of combination therapy is that the required exposure for a certain efficacy per drug component might be reduced compared with those needed in monotherapy. This may be an ideal way to avoid toxicity and increase efficacy.

In conclusion, the efficacy of polymyxin B monotherapy against A. baumannii was limited, especially in the murine lung infection model. Future studies are required to determine whether polymyxin B can be used in combination therapy with another compound, resulting in increased efficacy while avoiding toxicity.

Supplementary Material

dkag097_Supplementary_Data

Acknowledgements

We thank Marian ten Kate for her technical assistance. We also thank Pharmacelsus GmbH for the determination of polymyxin B1 and B2 levels by LC/MS-MS.

Contributor Information

Sanne van den Berg, Department of Medical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, Erasmus MC University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands; CATOR, Center for Antimicrobial Treatment Optimization Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.

Michel Pieren, BioVersys AG, Basel, Switzerland.

Sebastiaan D T Sassen, CATOR, Center for Antimicrobial Treatment Optimization Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands; Department of Hospital Pharmacy, Erasmus MC University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.

Willem A M de Jong, Department of Medical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, Erasmus MC University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.

Catharina S C Boonman, Department of Medical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, Erasmus MC University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.

Glenn E Dale, BioVersys AG, Basel, Switzerland.

Anouk E Muller, Department of Medical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, Erasmus MC University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands; CATOR, Center for Antimicrobial Treatment Optimization Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands; Department of Medical Microbiology, Haaglanden Medisch Centrum, The Hague, The Netherlands.

Funding

This work was funded by a research grant from BioVersys AG.

Transparency declarations

M.P. and G.E.D. are employed by and hold stocks in BioVersys AG. A.E.M. has received research grants from BioVersys and Wockhardt Ltd (all paid to the university). All other authors: none to declare.

Author contributions

Sanne van den Berg (Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Supervision, Writing—original draft), Michel Pieren (Conceptualization, Supervision, Writing—review & editing), Sebastiaan D.T. Sassen (Formal analysis, Writing—review & editing), Willem A. de Jong (Investigation, Project administration, Writing—review & editing), Catharina S. Boonman (Investigation, Project administration, Writing—review & editing), Glenn E. Dale (Conceptualization, Supervision, Writing—review & editing), and Anouk E. Muller (Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Writing—original draft).

Supplementary data

Figures S1 and S2 and Tables S1 and S2 are available as Supplementary data at JAC Online.

References

  • 1. Velkov  T, Roberts  KD, Nation  RL  et al.  Pharmacology of polymyxins: new insights into an ‘old’ class of antibiotics. Future Microbiol  2013; 8: 711–24. 10.2217/fmb.13.39 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Falagas  ME, Kasiakou  SK. Toxicity of polymyxins: a systematic review of the evidence from old and recent studies. Crit Care  2006; 10: R27. 10.1186/cc3995 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Landersdorfer  CB, Wang  J, Wirth  V  et al.  Pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics of systemically administered polymyxin B against Klebsiella pneumoniae in mouse thigh and lung infection models. J Antimicrob Chemother  2018; 73: 462–8. 10.1093/jac/dkx409 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. van der Meijden  A, Aranzana-Climent  V, van der Spek  H  et al.  Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties of polymyxin B in Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae murine infection models. J Antimicrob Chemother  2023; 78: 832–9. 10.1093/jac/dkad022 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Jiang  X, Patil  NA, Xu  Y  et al.  Structure-interaction relationship of polymyxins with lung surfactant. J Med Chem  2023; 66: 16109–19. 10.1021/acs.jmedchem.3c01497 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Lacroix  M, Moreau  J, Zampaloni  C  et al.  In vitro pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic modeling of the effect of mucin on polymyxin B activity against Acinetobacter baumannii. Antimicrob Agents Chemother  2025; 69: e0153524. 10.1128/aac.01535-24 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. European Union . Directive 2010/63/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 September 2010 on the protection of animals used for scientific purposes. European Union, 2010. [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Kubin  CJ, Nelson  BC, Miglis  C  et al.  Population pharmacokinetics of intravenous polymyxin B from clinical samples. Antimicrob Agents Chemother  2018; 62: e01493-17. 10.1128/AAC.01493-17 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Surovoy  YA, Burkin  MA, Galvidis  IA  et al.  Comparative polymyxin B pharmacokinetics in patients receiving extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. J Antimicrob Chemother  2022; 77: 1379–84. 10.1093/jac/dkac021 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Kwa  AL, Lim  TP, Low  JG  et al.  Pharmacokinetics of polymyxin B1 in patients with multidrug-resistant gram-negative bacterial infections. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis  2008; 60: 163–7. 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2007.08.008 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Abodakpi  H, Gohlke  J, Chang  KT  et al.  Analytical and functional determination of polymyxin B protein binding in serum. Antimicrob Agents Chemother  2015; 59: 7121–3. 10.1128/AAC.01815-15 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Sandri  AM, Landersdorfer  CB, Jacob  J  et al.  Population pharmacokinetics of intravenous polymyxin B in critically ill patients: implications for selection of dosage regimens. Clin Infect Dis  2013; 57: 524–31. 10.1093/cid/cit334 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Manchandani  P, Dubrovskaya  Y, Gao  S  et al.  Comparative pharmacokinetic profiling of different polymyxin B components. Antimicrob Agents Chemother  2016; 60: 6980–2. 10.1128/AAC.00702-16 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Crass  RL, Al Naimi  T, Wen  B  et al.  Pharmacokinetics of polymyxin B in hospitalized adults with cystic fibrosis. Antimicrob Agents Chemother  2021; 65: e0079221. 10.1128/AAC.00792-21 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Liu  X, Yu  Z, Wang  Y  et al.  Therapeutic drug monitoring of polymyxin B by LC-MS/MS in plasma and urine. Bioanalysis  2020; 12: 845–55. 10.4155/bio-2020-0051 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Jiao  Y, Yan  J, Vicchiarelli  M  et al.  Individual components of polymyxin B modeled via population pharmacokinetics to design humanized dosage regimens for a bloodstream and lung infection model in immune-competent mice. Antimicrob Agents Chemother  2023; 67: e0019723. 10.1128/aac.00197-23 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Cheah  SE, Wang  J, Nguyen  VT  et al.  New pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic studies of systemically administered colistin against Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Acinetobacter baumannii in mouse thigh and lung infection models: smaller response in lung infection. J Antimicrob Chemother  2015; 70: 3291–7. 10.1093/jac/dkv267 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Thamlikitkul  V, Tiengrim  S, Seenama  C. In vitro activity of polymyxin B against carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii. J Med Assoc Thai  2014; 97: 1254–8. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Gales  AC, Jones  RN, Sader  HS. Global assessment of the antimicrobial activity of polymyxin B against 54 731 clinical isolates of gram-negative bacilli: report from the SENTRY antimicrobial surveillance programme (2001–2004). Clin Microbiol Infect  2006; 12: 315–21. 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2005.01351.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. USCAST . Homepage. www.USCAST.org
  • 21. Zhao  C, Mao  W, Ye  F  et al.  Relationship between plasma polymyxin B concentrations and acute kidney injury in critically ill elderly patients: findings from a prospective study. J Int Med Res  2025; 53: 3000605251320733. 10.1177/03000605251320733 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Wang  P, Zhang  Q, Zhu  Z  et al.  Comparing the population pharmacokinetics of and acute kidney injury due to polymyxin B in Chinese patients with or without renal insufficiency. Antimicrob Agents Chemother  2021; 65: e01900-20. 10.1128/AAC.01900-20 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Han  L, Xu  FM, Zhang  XS  et al.  Trough polymyxin B plasma concentration is an independent risk factor for its nephrotoxicity. Br J Clin Pharmacol  2022; 88: 1202–10. 10.1111/bcp.15061 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Deng  Y, Gu  JY, Li  X  et al.  Does monitoring total and free polymyxin B1 plasma concentrations predict polymyxin B-induced nephrotoxicity? A retrospective study in critically ill patients. Infect Dis Ther  2022; 11: 1591–608. 10.1007/s40121-022-00655-3 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Zha  L, Zhang  X, Cheng  Y  et al.  Intravenous polymyxin B as adjunctive therapy to high-dose tigecycline for the treatment of nosocomial pneumonia due to carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii and Klebsiella pneumoniae: a propensity score-matched cohort study. Antibiotics (Basel)  2023; 12: 273. 10.3390/antibiotics12020273 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

dkag097_Supplementary_Data

Articles from Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES