Skip to main content
Frontiers in Veterinary Science logoLink to Frontiers in Veterinary Science
. 2026 Mar 12;13:1731158. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2026.1731158

Cryptosporidium within a One health framework: a comprehensive review of public health impact, environmental concerns, and emerging strategies for prevention and treatment

Refaat Ras 1,2, Adel Abdelkhalek 3, Enrique Raya-Álvarez 4, Rawan Muhammad Shady 3,5, Qwait AlGabbani 6, Abdelbaset E Abdelbaset 7,8, Ali S A Saleem 9, Mustafa Shukry 10,*, Ahmed Agil 11, Ehab Kotb Elmahallawy 12,13,*
PMCID: PMC13019758  PMID: 41908954

Abstract

Cryptosporidium species are globally distributed parasites and are a major cause of cryptosporidiosis, a diarrheal disease that disproportionately affects immunocompromised individuals and young children in low-resource settings. Cryptosporidium is widely regarded as a critical contaminant of drinking water and is strongly associated with an increased risk of waterborne disease, posing a serious threat to public health. Furthermore, agricultural environments can serve as sources of contamination with Cryptosporidium oocysts through fecal material originating from both humans and animals. Despite their major zoonotic relevance, critical gaps remain in understanding their true public health burden, transmission pathways, and ways to effectively translate emerging knowledge into prevention and treatment strategies. Currently, nitazoxanide is the only FDA-approved treatment for cryptosporidiosis; however, its efficacy in vulnerable populations remains limited. Safe and effective chemotherapeutics are urgently needed; yet drug evaluation methods lack standardization, and no reliable vaccine surrogates capable of inducing protective immunity have been identified. Additionally, the identification of vaccination surrogates that confer protective immune responses against Cryptosporidium infection remains an unresolved need. In addition, Cryptosporidium diagnosis relies on fecal microscopy, antigen-based assays for rapid detection, and molecular methods, such as PCR, for sensitive species identification and genotyping. Emerging approaches, including next-generation sequencing, promise improved multiplex detection and epidemiological resolution but require further integration into routine clinical laboratory workflows. This review summarizes the advances in Cryptosporidium therapeutics, including herbal, chemical, and pharmaceutical approaches, as well as chemical agents utilized for water treatment and environmental control, highlighting associated safety concerns and diagnostics. It further outlines priority areas for future research, such as the development of novel drug candidates, host-targeted therapies, and next-generation vaccine platforms. Finally, it underscores the complex, multifactorial challenges of controlling Cryptosporidium and calls for a One Health approach that integrates human, animal, and environmental health to mitigate its global impact.

Keywords: Cryptosporidium, environment, One health, prevention, public health, treatment, zoonoses

1. Background

Cryptosporidium is an apicomplexan parasite that colonizes the gastrointestinal tract of humans and animals, causing cryptosporidiosis, a disease characterized by diarrhea, abdominal pain, and severe dehydration (1). Although often self-limiting, the infection is especially severe in immunocompromised individuals, including people living with HIV/AIDS, where it often progresses to chronic and debilitating illness (2). As a leading waterborne pathogen, Cryptosporidium imposes a substantial disease burden across both developed and developing countries (3). The burden of the disease is most pronounced in settings with inadequate sanitation and limited access to clean water, placing young children, the elderly, and immunocompromised populations at highest risk. Moreover, the Global Enteric Multicenter Study identified Cryptosporidium as one of the four leading pathogens, causing moderate to severe diarrhea in children under 5 years of age in sub-Saharan Africa and South Asia (2). In developed countries, outbreaks are often associated with recreational water sources like swimming pools and water parks, highlighting the persistence of Cryptosporidium spp. as a public health concern (4). Millions of cases are recorded worldwide each year, underscoring the urgent need for more effective prevention and treatment strategies (5). The parasite’s remarkable resilience stems from its tough, thick-walled oocysts, which enable it to survive harsh environmental conditions and resist many common water disinfectants. This resilience has contributed to an increase in the number of outbreaks worldwide (6).

Transmission of Cryptosporidium spp. occurs predominantly through the fecal-oral route, with humans becoming infected primarily through ingestion of oocysts present in contaminated water, food, or surfaces. The species most commonly causing human disease are C. parvum and C. hominis, which together account for the vast majority of infections globally (7). Notably, certain species of Cryptosporidium, particularly C. parvum, infecting a wide range of hosts including livestock, companion animals, and rodents, which serve as major reservoirs, shedding large numbers of oocysts into the environment and contaminating water, food, and surfaces (8–11). Moreover, wild birds can also contribute to oocyst contamination of water and food supplies, further complicating the transmission dynamics (12). A recent report indicated that the global prevalence of Cryptosporidium in wild birds was estimated to be 3.96% (1945 of 49,129), encompassing six species (C. parvum, C. meleagridis, C. andersoni, C. avium, C. galli, and C. baileyi) and five distinct genotypes (Goose genotype I, Goose genotype II, Avian genotype I, Avian genotype III, and Avian genotype VI) (13). Furthermore, the detection of C. bovis and C. parvum in yak animals highlights cryptosporidiosis as a One Health concern, reflecting risks at the animal–human–environment interface which support the need for integrated prevention and control strategies to protect livestock health and reduce potential public health impact (14). Other Cryptosporidium species, including C. andersoni, C. felis, C. meleagridis, C. suis and C. canis have been identified in both animals and humans (9). In addition, C. ubiquitum, C. viatorum, and C. cuniculus, along with various other genotypes, can also infect humans (15, 16).

Taken together, the zoonotic nature of the parasite underscores the urgent need for coordinated One Health approaches, involving veterinary, medical, and environmental sectors, to monitor and mitigate transmission risks. Clearly, precise characterization of Cryptosporidium genetic diversity is critical for source tracking in both animals and humans (17, 18). Notably, the actual burden of cryptosporidiosis in both human and veterinary health remains unclear, as many cases of infection are often undiagnosed or unreported. Therefore, effective control strategies require an integrated approach, including developing vaccines for livestock and humans, improving sanitation, implementing better risk management, and employing advanced genotyping to track and differentiate Cryptosporidium species. Treating livestock and human waste to reduce oocyst viability is crucial to minimizing environmental contamination and protecting water catchments. Public health education on transmission routes and preventative measures, such as handwashing, are also essential for reducing disease incidence. Collectively, a successful One Health strategy not only reduces disease in livestock but also improves water quality, preserves biodiversity, and lowers the risk to human populations, as illustrated in Figure 1, which highlights the interconnected benefits of this integrated approach.

Figure 1.

Cryptosporidosis and One Health policy and human-animal-environment interactions in disease transmission. Arrows show pathways from animal fecal contamination to environmental spread, food and water contamination, human infection, and mitigation strategies including personal hygiene, vaccination, herbal and chemical treatments.

Cryptosporidiosis and One Health: interactions between human, animal, and environmental health. The image was generated through Biorender software (Free trial version). Blue triangle symbol (Blue equilateral triangle filled with a solid color, oriented with one point facing upward, placed against a white background.), excysted Cryptosporidium oocysts with invasive sporozoite, other stages of schizogony are and gamatogony not demonstrated. Red asterisk symbol (Red starfish illustration with five elongated, pointed arms extending from a central body, displayed against a white background.), the image of environment was generated by Notebook software.

2. Literature search

A comprehensive search was conducted in PubMed, SCOPUS, Google Scholar, ScienceDirect and other databases to find relevant research articles without time limitation up to 04 December 2025 using the following criteria and keywords; “Cryptosporidium” and “Cryptosporidiosis” and “One Health” and “treatment” and “Therapies” and “Herbal” and “environmental” and “Public Health” and “Vaccination” and “Drug resistance” and Diagnostics. Articles related to Cryptosporidium are included in the list of references. Overall, the obtained articles were found to be relevant to the subject of the current study, and valuable scientific knowledge was summarized in the following sections.

3. Pathogenesis and clinical manifestations

As depicted in Figure 1, Cryptosporidium oocysts are shed in the feces of infected humans and animals and contaminate water, soil, fresh produce, and food-processing environments. Their strong resistance to chlorine and ability to survive for months in moist conditions make them a persistent environmental hazard (19). Infection begins when a person or animal consumes Cryptosporidium oocysts through contaminated water or food. Each oocyst carries four sporozoites that are released in the small intestine. These sporozoites then invade the lining of the intestine, triggering an immune response that leads to inflammation and damage to the intestinal barrier, resulting in diarrhea and nutrient malabsorption (15, 20). In addition, animals particularly calves, lambs, goats, and young companion animals serve as major sources of oocyst contamination (10), increasing the environmental load and raising the risk of zoonotic transmission to humans, especially farmers, veterinarians, and children living near livestock facilities (9, 21). The severity of illness depends largely on the strength of the host’s immune system. In healthy individuals, the infection often causes mild to moderate diarrhea, along with abdominal discomfort, nausea, and sometimes vomiting, including subclinical infections, wherein symptoms may be less evident (22). Most people recover on their own within a couple of weeks (1). However, for immunocompromised patients, such as those living with HIV/AIDS, elderly, or malnourished children, the infection can cause severe, persistent diarrhea, significant weight loss, and life-threatening dehydration (15). Extra-intestinal manifestations, such as biliary tract infections, are also more common in these vulnerable groups. Furthermore, a previous study (23) demonstrated that Cryptosporidium infection is associated with distinct alterations in the fungal community of pigs, underscoring the interconnected roles of host, pathogen, and microbiome which influences host immune response and gut homeostasis. Given its transmission and pathogenicity, understanding how Cryptosporidium interacts with the host and triggers immune responses, as well as the spectrum of symptoms it produces, is critical for developing more effective treatments and preventive strategies (16).

4. Current treatment approaches

4.1. Overview of currently approved treatments

Current treatment approaches for cryptosporidiosis remain limited, with nitazoxanide being the only FDA-approved drug specifically indicated for this infection (24). Other agents, such as paromomycin and azithromycin, have been used alongside supportive care to help control symptoms and improve outcomes in certain patients (25). However, their inconsistent effectiveness and lack of a fully dependable cure highlights the urgent need for new, more effective therapies (26). The following sections outline the existing treatment strategies, highlighting their active components and mechanisms of action (Table 1).

Table 1.

Integrated summary of preclinical and clinical data on therapeutic efficacy against Cryptosporidium infection.

Treatment Category Pros Cons Gaps and future direction References
Nitazoxanide FDA-approved Effective in immunocompetent individuals Reduced efficacy in immunocompromised patients Optimization of dosing and combination therapies (24, 31)
Paromomycin Off-label use Inhibits protein synthesis in parasites Nephrotoxicity Lack of FDA approval, need for clinical trials (30, 35)
Azithromycin Off-label use Broad-spectrum activity Variable efficacy in immunocompromised patients Clarification of optimal dosing and combination with other agents (38)
Benzoxaboroles Inhibits leucyl-tRNA synthetase Potent against drug-resistant strains Limited clinical data Further clinical trials to establish safety and efficacy (42)
PI(4)K inhibitors Disrupts phosphoinositide metabolism Novel Mechanism of action Limited clinical validation Development of formulations suitable for clinical use (44)
Protease inhibitors Inhibits essential proteases of the parasite Potential for broad-spectrum activity Limited efficacy data in clinical settings Optimization of compound potency and pharmacokinetic profiles (115)
Macrolides (e.g., Clarithromycin) Inhibits protein synthesis Alternative to azithromycin Limited clinical data Comparative trials with azithromycin for efficacy and safety (116)
Rifabutin Inhibits bacterial RNA polymerase Potential for anti-Cryptosporidium activity Potential drug interactions with other medications Optimization of dosing regimens and evaluation in clinical trials (117)
Highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) Suppresses HIV replication Manages underlying HIV infection Potential for drug interactions and side effects Optimization of regimens for dual management of HIV and Cryptosporidium (118)
Supportive therapy* Symptomatic relief and hydration Improves patient comfort and hydration Does not eliminate Cryptosporidium infection Integration with specific anti-Cryptosporidium treatments Supportive care guidelines and clinical practice

*Supportive therapy including fluid and electrolyte administration in case of dehydration and diarrhea.

4.1.1. Nitazoxanide

Nitazoxanide is widely recognized as an important option for managing cryptosporidiosis because it acts directly on the energy metabolism of Cryptosporidium parasites. With FDA approval for this particular indication, nitazoxanide has demonstrated its efficacy in reducing the severity and duration of diarrhea associated with Cryptosporidium infection in both immunocompetent and immunocompromised individuals (27). Its antiparasitic activity is mediated through inhibition of the enzyme pyruvate:ferredoxin oxidoreductase, a key component of the parasite’s anaerobic energy metabolism, thereby impairing Cryptosporidium survival and replication (24). However, its therapeutic success is more consistent in individuals with intact immunity, whereas outcomes are often suboptimal in severely immunocompromised populations. Therefore, Elmansory et al. 2025 (28) conducted an evaluation of the efficacy of ivermectin (IVM) and albendazole (ALB), both individually and in combination with nitazoxanide (NTZ), in immunosuppressed mice infected with C. parvum. The combination therapies, particularly NTZ in conjunction with IVM, resulted in the most significant reductions in oocyst shedding, followed by NTZ combined with ALB. These combinations proved superior to all monotherapies, underscoring the limited effectiveness of NTZ alone in immunocompromised hosts. Furthermore, a randomized controlled trial study by Amadi et al. (29), examined 50 children with HIV and 50 without HIV. Among the HIV-negative children, diarrhea resolved in 14 of 25 who received nitazoxanide, compared to 5 of 22 who were given a placebo, showing a 33% difference. C. parvum was cleared in 13 of the 25 children treated with nitazoxanide, while only 3 of the 22 children in the placebo group experienced clearance (difference of 38%). By the eighth day, four children (18%) in the placebo group had died, whereas there were no deaths in the nitazoxanide group. However, nitazoxanide demonstrated no therapeutic efficacy in HIV-seropositive children, and no significant adverse effects were observed in either treatment group.

The drug is generally well tolerated, with mild gastrointestinal disturbances such as nausea and abdominal discomfort being the most commonly reported side effects (30, 31). Although nitazoxanide is the only approved antiparasitic drug for use against Cryptosporidium in humans, its effectiveness in veterinary species is not well established (32, 33).

4.1.2. Paromomycin

Paromomycin is an aminoglycoside antibiotic used in the treatment of cryptosporidiosis, particularly among immunocompromised patients for whom therapeutic alternatives remain limited (34). Its mode of action involves binding to the 30S ribosomal subunit of the parasite, thereby disrupting protein synthesis and inhibiting parasite replication, which supports the clearance of the infection from the gastrointestinal tract (35). Although paromomycin showed moderate efficacy, it has not received specific approval from the FDA for cryptosporidiosis, which limits its widespread clinical application. In addition, paromomycin had low toxicity and moderate therapeutic efficacy against cryptosporidiosis at high doses in an animal model system (36). A recent study indicated that paromomycin, now available in the UK through veterinary prescription, reduces oocyst shedding and alleviates diarrhea; however, it also poses a risk of toxicity (8). Owing to these limitations, paromomycin is frequently administered in combination with other therapeutic agents to improve treatment success and reduce side effects, emphasizing the urgent need for the development of new and more effective therapies against cryptosporidiosis (37).

4.1.3. Azithromycin

Azithromycin, a macrolide antibiotic, has been evaluated as a therapeutic option for cryptosporidiosis, especially in immuno-compromised individuals such as those living with HIV/AIDS. Its mechanism involves binding to the 50S ribosomal subunit of the parasite and inhibits protein synthesis in which impairs parasite replication, which supports clearance from the intestinal tract (38). Although azithromycin demonstrates some antiparasitic activity, its efficacy as monotherapy is limited. It is therefore most often administered in combination with other agents to improve treatment outcomes (25). Reported adverse effects include gastrointestinal disturbances and potential drug–drug interaction. Careful clinical monitoring is required to ensure patient safety, particularly in patients with pre-existing liver dysfunction or those receiving concurrent therapies (25).

4.1.4. Halofuginone lactate

Halofuginone lactate (HFL), a synthetic quinazolinone compound, exhibits cryptosporidiostatic activity that targets the sporozoite and merozoite stages of C. parvum. It is used for both therapeutic and prophylactic purposes, effectively delaying the onset of infection, reducing oocyst shedding, and mitigating the clinical severity of cryptosporidiosis in calves (39). A previous research (40) found that halofuginone lactate and paromomycin are effective treatments for cryptosporidiosis in calves, and recommended their use to manage C. parvum infections. Furthermore, HFL is currently the only approved treatment for Cryptosporidium infection in calves. It is licensed for use in regions such as the United Kingdom and the European Union, but has not yet received approval in the United States (41).

4.2. Novel drug candidates

Recent efforts to develop new therapies for cryptosporidiosis have focused on exploiting the parasite-specific metabolic pathways and essential enzymatic targets. Benzoxaboroles have emerged as promising candidates through to their inhibition of leucyl tRNA synthetase, an enzyme indispensable for protein synthesis in Cryptosporidium spp. (42, 43). Preclinical studies have demonstrated that benzoxaboroles exhibit potent activity against both drug sensitive and resistant strains, highlighting their potential as next-generation antiparasitic agents. Consequently, the 6-carboxamide benzoxaborole AN7973 may possess therapeutic potential for a diverse range of patient populations affected by cryptosporidiosis, including individuals with AIDS, transplant recipients, and malnourished children. In addition to demonstrating efficacy in murine models of both acute and chronic infections, AN7973 reduced C. parvum fecal shedding, diarrhea, and dehydration in a neonatal calf model that closely mimics the disease observed in human infants (43).

Another target of considerable interest is phosphatidylinositol 4-kinase (PI4K), an enzyme that plays a central role in phosphoinositide metabolism and is vital for the survival and intracellular development of the parasite (44).

Plasmodium PI(4)K inhibitors diaryl-aminopyridine (MMV390048), have demonstrated substantial suppression of C. parvum proliferation in both in vitro assays and murine infection models, with minimal adverse effects. Similarly, compounds such as KDU73 and BQR695 have shown comparable efficacy, achieving significant reductions in parasite burden in preclinical evaluations (45). Moreover, Manjunatha et al. 2017 (44) highlighted the potential of the pyrazolopyridine compound KDU731 as a promising therapeutic candidate against C. parvum and C. hominis. In contrast to nitazoxanide, KDU731 demonstrated significant in vivo efficacy in immunocompromised murine models. Furthermore, when administered to neonatal calves, a model that closely replicates the treatment challenges encountered in young, malnourished children; it resulted in a marked reduction in parasite shedding and a rapid amelioration of diarrhea and dehydration.

Collectively, these advances underscore an active pursuit of novel compounds that could complement or replace current therapies, providing much needed alternatives for high-risk groups who face severe forms of this infection (46, 47).

4.3. Host-targeted therapies

Current investigations into host-directed treatments for Cryptosporidium aim to leverage the host immune machinery to suppress parasite development and limit disease progression. A key approach involves the use of immunostimulatory agents designed to activate innate immune responses and enhance the clearance of infected cells. Agents such as specific cytokines and interferons have shown promise in boosting immune reactivity against Cryptosporidium species (48). Another promising approach focuses on blocking the cellular pathways or surface receptors that the parasite relies on to invade and persist within the intestinal epithelium. Targeting host factors rather than the parasite directly offers the advantage of lowering the potential for drug resistance. For example, Potiron et al. (49) demonstrated that modulating dendritic cell responses in experimental models reduced both parasite burden and disease intensity. Continued efforts are directed at identifying new host factors and refining immunotherapeutic interventions to offer additional options for managing cryptosporidiosis, especially in patients with compromised immunity (49, 50).

4.4. Herbal remedies

Herbal medicines are gaining attention as promising candidates in the fight against Cryptosporidium infections due to their natural origin and long-standing use in traditional healing. The following subsections summarize the most studied herbal candidates and the mechanisms underlying their effects.

4.4.1. Garlic (Allium sativum)

Garlic (Allium sativum) has been investigated for its potential to treat Cryptosporidium due to its well-documented antimicrobial properties. The active component of garlic, allicin, has shown effectiveness in inhibiting the growth of C. parvum in vivo, disrupting the parasite’s metabolic processes (51). Studies indicated that allicin interferes with thiol-dependent enzymatic systems within the parasite, impeding its ability to replicate and survive (52, 53). Furthermore, garlic’s immunomodulatory effects may bolster the host’s immune response, offering a dual mechanism of action against the infection (54).

4.4.2. Berberis vulgaris

Berberis vulgaris (commonly known as barberry) shows considerable therapeutic potential against protozoa, largely due to its high content of berberine, an isoquinoline alkaloid well recognized for its potent antiprotozoal activity (55). Beyond its direct antiparasitic action, berberine’s well established anti-inflammatory and immune modulating properties may also help strengthen the host’s immune defenses, amplifying its overall effectiveness as a treatment option (56).

4.4.3. Nigella sativa

Nigella sativa (black seed), with both the seeds and their oil are rich in thymoquinone, a bioactive compound displaying antiparasitic and immunomodulatory properties (57, 58). Interestingly, N. sativa has demonstrated superior efficacy to nitazoxanide in mitigating C. parvum infection and restoring intestinal integrity. Its immunomodulatory effects, enhancing IFN-γ production and decreasing oocyst shedding; further highlight its promise as a supportive anti-cryptosporidial therapy (59). Research also reported that N. sativa may regulate immune functions, increasing the production of cytokines and other immune cells that can be crucial in combating infections (60).

4.4.4. Turmeric (Curcuma longa)

Turmeric (Curcuma longa) has attracted considerable scientific interest for its possible role in treating infections caused by Cryptosporidium, mainly due to curcumin, its main bioactive ingredient. Curcumin possesses strong antiprotozoal, anti-inflammatory, and immunomodulatory properties (61, 62). Research has demonstrated that curcumin supplementation reshapes the gut microbiota composition, reduces C. parvum oocyst shedding, and prevents infection recurrence (61).

4.4.5. Neem (Azadirachta indica)

Neem, a medicinal plant originating from South Asia, has demonstrated significant potential as a therapeutic agent for treating of protozoa due to its potent antiparasitic properties (63). Furthermore, Azadirachta indica (neem) demonstrates potent antiproliferative, antioxidant, and anti-inflammatory properties, with its leaf-derived flavonoid quercetin identified as an active compound effective against C. parvum (64).

Overall, turmeric (Curcuma longa) showed the strongest preclinical evidence against Cryptosporidium, with its component curcumin exhibiting antiparasitic and immunomodulatory properties. On the other hand, garlic (Allium sativum) inhibits parasite replication through allicin, while neem (Azadirachta indica) shows promising activity in preliminary studies. Turmeric remains the most promising candidate for clinical application, with garlic and neem requiring further validation for therapeutic strategies. In addition, despite promising preclinical evidence, most herbal compounds lack well-designed clinical trials in humans and animals.

5. Prophylactic measures, hygienic practices and public health interventions (environmental control)

5.1. Water treatment and sanitation

Cryptosporidium outbreaks have provided critical lessons for enhancing response and prevention frameworks. The 1993 Milwaukee incident, one of the largest documented waterborne outbreaks, underscored the necessity of implementing stringent water treatment protocols and continuous monitoring systems to interrupt transmission pathways (65). Similarly, outbreaks associated with recreational water venues have illuminated the crucial role of maintaining rigorous hygiene standards and elevating public education to mitigate infection risks (66). Agricultural environments further contribute to Cryptosporidium contamination, primarily due to the presence of fecal matter originating from both human and animal sources (67). However, Cryptosporidium oocysts can contaminate vegetables, fruits, juices, unpasteurized milk, raw meat, and fish through various sources such as infected food handlers, sewage contamination, agricultural runoff, and the use of manure from infected animals as fertilizer, potentially resulting in serious foodborne outbreaks (68). Among these sources, cattle manure represents a particularly significant risk, as an adult bovine can excrete over 36 million C. parvum oocysts daily. This observation highlights that manure from dairy or beef cattle operations can serve as a significant source of C. parvum contamination if effective manure management or treatment strategies are not implemented to reduce oocyst viability or prevent their transport to aquatic environments as recreational water sources (69). To address these risks, the mitigation of Cryptosporidium transmission through drinking water requires the implementation of scientifically validated treatment processes, including filtration, chlorination, ultraviolet irradiation, and ozonation. These interventions function to physically remove or chemically inactivate oocysts, thereby ensuring compliance with established microbiological water quality standards. In parallel, adherence to evidence-based hygiene practices, such as rigorous handwashing following defecation and prior to food handling, is essential for interrupting fecal-oral transmission pathways. Population-level health education and behavior change interventions serve as critical components of integrated control strategies, enhancing public awareness and promoting sustained adoption of preventive measures (70).

5.1.1. Chemical treatments of water

Chemical disinfectants such as chlorine dioxide, ozone, and hydrogen peroxide play a pivotal role in controlling Cryptosporidium contamination, especially within water treatment processes. To further understand the critical roles of chemical disinfectants in controlling Cryptosporidium, the following section will examine the distinct properties and practical considerations associated with chlorine dioxide, ozone, and hydrogen peroxide in water treatment applications.

5.1.1.1. Chlorine dioxide

Chlorine dioxide has emerged as a potent chemical agent for treating waterborne Cryptosporidium due to its strong oxidizing properties (71, 72). Recent investigations indicate that chlorine dioxide exhibits superior disinfectant efficacy compared with free chlorine in the inactivation of Cryptosporidium oocysts (73).

5.1.1.2. Ozone

Ozone was the most effective treatment, achieving complete (100%) inactivation of C. parvum oocysts at a concentration of 24 mg/L through oxidation (74, 75). In addition, drinking water utilities that use ozone as a primary disinfectant and allow adequate contact time with a secondary disinfectant in clear wells or reservoirs can achieve substantially greater protection against C. parvum oocysts than with the primary disinfectant alone as chlorine (76).

5.1.1.3. Hydrogen peroxide

Hydrogen peroxide has been widely studied as an antimicrobial compound targeting bacterial, fungal, and viral foodborne pathogens, owing to its potent oxidizing properties (77). Studies indicated that it reduces Cryptosporidium viability by damaging both cell membranes and internal structures (78). This oxidative stress leads to parasite inactivation and a marked decline in infective capacity (79–81). An environmental advantage of hydrogen peroxide is its ability to decompose into water and oxygen, leaving no harmful residues in treated environments. However, its effectiveness against Cryptosporidium can vary depending on factors such as concentration, contact time, and environmental conditions.

5.2. Personal hygiene

Rigorous personal hygiene is a fundamental measure for preventing the transmission of Cryptosporidium. Consistent and thorough handwashing with soap and clean water markedly reduces the risk of pathogen transfer through the fecal oral route. In childcare environments, thorough sanitation of toys and frequently touched surfaces is essential, particularly during outbreak periods. Individuals should avoid drinking untreated water or ice, especially in areas with questionable water safety, and should not swim during episodes of diarrhea or for at least 2 weeks after symptoms have fully resolved (82). Furthermore, caregivers who did not wash their hands after toileting were nearly three times more likely to have children infected with Cryptosporidium than handwashing ones, and those who relied on toilet paper alone were 1.6 times more likely to have infected children, demonstrating that toilet paper is not an effective hygiene measure unless combined with proper handwashing, safe waste disposal, and adequate sanitation (83).

Sustainable control requires combining individual hygienic practices with community level interventions that protect the microbiological quality of water supplies and break the transmission cycle of waterborne diseases (70). Therefore, cryptosporidiosis was highly prevalent among both cattle and their owners, with molecular detection of the C. parvum IId subtype in animal and human samples confirming zoonotic transmission. These findings, within a One Health framework, highlight the necessity for integrated surveillance and preventive strategies targeting livestock management, human health, and environmental hygiene to reduce the burden of this zoonotic infection (84).

6. Vaccination strategies

6.1. Current research on vaccines

Vaccine development targeting Cryptosporidium is progressing rapidly but remains complicated due to the parasite’s complex life cycle and antigen variation. To date, no vaccine with proven efficacy or favorable cost-effectiveness has been developed for Cryptosporidium (85). However various vaccine platforms have been explored, including development of recombinant protein vaccines as well as gp40- based vaccine, which have been primarily investigated in bovine models with the goal of activating both systemic and mucosal immunity (86, 87). Then, vaccination provided strong protection, as evidenced by a significant reduction in the severity and duration of diarrhea, improved calf health and weight gain, and the absence of mortality, with benefits observed in both suckling calves and calves that received colostrum from vaccinated dams (87). Despite promising preclinical results, clinical application is hindered by the parasite’s ability to evade immune detection and its complex interaction with host cells (1). Significant progress has been also made recently by identifying key antigens such as Cp15 and Cp23 that are essential for parasite survival and infection, allowing for more precise vaccine targeting (88). Numerous recent advances, including the use of DNA vaccines, novel vectors that stimulate mucosal immunity, and CpG oligonucleotides as adjuvants, may facilitate the development of vaccines (89).

It should be noted that the identification of immune targets and the development of effective vaccines are limited by the absence of a reliable in vitro system for parasite propagation. Consequently, reverse vaccinology approaches that use bioinformatic tools provide a compelling alternative for the discovery of vaccine candidates as a previously known vaccine candidate GP60 and a novel glycosylphosphatidylinositol (GPI) anchored antigens, CpH1 and CpSUB2 were confirmed as potential vaccine candidates against C. parvum infection (90). Moreover, a multi-epitope vaccine candidate designed from highly immunogenic epitopes may offer a promising and effective strategy for preventing Cryptosporidium hominis infection (91). Another recent study using multi-epitope subunit vaccine targeting immunogenic regions of C. parvum were performed in silico which provides a strong and promising basis for the development of safe and effective vaccines against cryptosporidiosis (92). Despite significant progress, fundamental biological and immunological challenges continue to impede Cryptosporidium vaccine development. Therefore, it is essential to dissect the parasite’s immune evasion mechanisms and address the complexities that must be overcome to achieve effective and sustained vaccine-induced protection. To provide a clear overview of the advancements and critical insights in Cryptosporidium vaccine research (Table 2).

Table 2.

Implications from previous studies informing Cryptosporidium vaccine development.

Methodology Research Approaches (In vitro /In vivo/Clinical) Key Findings References
Focused on selecting antigens that stimulate T-cell responses. In vitro Identified gp40/15 as a critical antigen, with IFN-γ as a key cytokine for immune defense against Cryptosporidium. (89, 119)
Characterized sporozoite surface proteins (Cpgp40 and Cpgp40/15) and tested antibody-neutralization assays. In vitro Anti-gp40 and anti-gp40/15 antibodies significantly inhibited Cryptosporidium parvum infection. (120)
Explored immunogenicity of gp40 and other surface antigens in animal and human models. In vivo gp40 induces T-cell activation, with promising immunogenic properties, though protective efficacy remains unclear. (121, 122)
Investigated antigen-based vaccines, including profilin, P2 antigen, Muc4, and Cryptosporidium apyrase. Clinical/In vivo Highlighted the immunogenic potential of various antigens, though further validation is needed for practical application. (123–125)
Evaluated CpGP15 recombinant antigen for C. parvum infection elimination in cattle. Clinical Demonstrated CpGP15’s effectiveness in clearing infections and improving diagnostic accuracy in animal farms. (126)
Studied CP15 and circumsporozoite-like (CSL) peptides in vitro. In vitro CP15 and CSL peptides stimulated antibody production and neutralized parasite entry into host cells. (86)
Investigated thrombospondin-related anonymous protein (TRAP) in C. parvum and other apicomplexans. In vitro/In vivo TRAP proteins facilitate gliding motility and host-cell invasion, marking them as strong candidates for vaccine development. (127)
Studied TRAP-C1, a protein located at the apical end of Cryptosporidium sporozoites. In vitro TRAP-C1 is essential for cell penetration and gliding motility, supporting its potential as a vaccine candidate. (128, 129)
Examined CpTSP8, a TRAP-like protein located in sporozoites and merozoites. In vitro/In vivo CpTSP8 is crucial for gliding motility, invasion, and attachment to host cells, making it a promising target for vaccine development. (130, 131)
Characterized Cp-P34, a novel sporozoite surface protein, in naturally exposed alpacas. In vivo Cp-P34 stimulates immune responses and appears transiently on the sporozoite surface, suggesting its role in gliding and host-cell attachment processes. (132)

6.2. Challenges in vaccine development

The pursuit of an effective vaccine against Cryptosporidium is hindered by the parasite’s intricate biology and sophisticated strategies for immune evasion. Its complex lifecycle, which encompasses both asexual and sexual phases, complicates the identification of optimal antigenic targets for vaccine development. Although the immune system contributes to the control of established C. parvum infection, immunity acquired following primary exposure does not necessarily provide protection against reinfection. As far, active vaccination of newborn livestock faces significant practical and immunological challenges, whereas passive immunization; achieved by immunizing dams to provide protective antibodies to their offspring through colostrum, has emerged as a valuable and effective alternative strategy (93). The lack of reliable animal models limits preclinical evaluation of vaccine candidates. Moreover, since the parasite colonizes intestinal epithelial cells within the gastrointestinal tract, eliciting a strong and lasting mucosal immune response remains a major challenge. A controlled human infection model (CHIM) for Cryptosporidium in healthy adult volunteers provides a robust clinical proof-of-concept platform for evaluating novel therapeutics and vaccine as well as this model has the potential to accelerate the development of both drugs and vaccines for cryptosporidiosis (94).

7. Challenges in treatment and prophylaxis

7.1. Exceptional biological traits of Cryptosporidium

Cryptosporidium possesses unique biological features that complicate drug discovery, including its intracellular but extracytoplasmic niche, where it is separated from the host cytoplasm by an electron-dense band as the host plasma membrane folds up to envelop the invading sporozoite and forms the parasitophorous vacuole membrane, poses significant challenges for antiparasitic drug discovery (95). These characteristics restrict the effectiveness of conventional antiparasitic screening approaches and contribute to poor compound selectivity. Many candidate compounds demonstrated efficacy in vitro systems or in vivo models but failed to translate to clinical trials, which more accurately reflect severe human disease. This limitation has hindered the progression of promising leads into clinical development (30).

7.2. Drug resistance

The emergence of drug-resistant Cryptosporidium strains poses a significant challenge to the effective management and control of cryptosporidiosis. Hasan et al. (96) evaluated the highly potent C. parvum methionyl-tRNA (CpMetRS) synthetase inhibitor 2093, using a neonatal calf model of cryptosporidiosis. In experimentally infected dairy calves, the administration of compound 2093 led to an initial decrease in oocyst shedding during the first 4 days post-infection. However, by day five, parasite shedding resumed in most treated calves, suggesting the probable emergence of drug resistance. This resistance is attributed to mutations in CpMetRS that resulted in amino acid substitutions. The rapid development of resistance was likely facilitated by the high parasite burden in the dairy calf model; however, it remains uncertain whether additional tolerance or resistance mechanisms contribute to parasite persistence.

On other hand, to distinguish whether anti-cryptosporidial drug activity targets the parasite or the host cell, a previous study (97) developed an advanced in vitro model using stable MDR1-transgenic HCT-8 cells with enhanced drug tolerance. Nitazoxanide, the frontline treatment for cryptosporidiosis, has limited efficacy, particularly in immunocompromised patients. While, alternative therapies are also suboptimal, complicating clinical management and highlighting the need for new treatment strategies (1).

7.3. Variability in response to treatment

The management of Cryptosporidium infections remains complex due to the heterogeneous therapeutic outcomes observed among different patient groups. In immunocompetent hosts, the infection often manifests as a self-limiting diarrheal illness that may be resolved without targeted treatment. In contrast, immunosuppressed individuals, including those living with HIV/AIDS, are prone to severe, persistent infections necessitating active medical management (1). The variability in clinical response is shaped by multiple factors, including the host’s immune competence, specific Cryptosporidium species and genotypes involved (98).

7.4. Current limitations in the development of conventional and herbal remedies for Cryptosporidium

The development of novel pharmacological and herbal treatments for Cryptosporidium infection faces substantial challenges due to the parasite’s unique biology and the complex determinants of therapeutic efficacy. A primary barrier in drug discovery is the absence of reliable in vitro and in vivo models that faithfully replicate the complexities of human infection, thereby limiting the accurate assessment and high-throughput screening of candidate compounds. Furthermore, the parasite’s capacity to develop resistance against frontline drugs such as nitazoxanide, coupled with difficulties in delivering effective drug concentrations to the intestinal epithelium, significantly impedes successful treatment outcomes (33).

7.5. Culturing Cryptosporidium oocysts

Establishing reliable in vitro culture systems for Cryptosporidium oocysts remains a major obstacle, hindering progress in parasite biology and therapeutic development. The complex life cycle of Cryptosporidium, requiring specific host cells and environments to develop and proliferate properly (99). Unlike many other pathogens, long term culture remains constrained by persistent limitations, frequently necessitating reliance on animal models or specialized cell lines that are limited in availability and impractical for large-scale experimentation. Additionally, maintaining continuous Cryptosporidium infection in vitro culture systems can be problematic due to their strict environmental requirements for temperature, pH, and nutrient composition (99, 100). These challenges significantly constrain high-throughput drug screening and in-depth investigations into parasite pathogenesis.

7.6. Socioeconomic determinants

The successful implementation of prophylactic measures against Cryptosporidium infections is strongly influenced by socioeconomic factors, particularly in low-resource settings. Limited access to safe drinking water and inadequate sanitation infrastructure substantially increase the risk of waterborne transmission (101). Among Zambian children with HIV-related immunosuppression, nitazoxanide, despite higher doses and prolonged treatment, did not eliminate cryptosporidiosis or alleviate symptoms which confirmed the drug’s lack of efficacy in this patient group (31). Addressing these barriers requires integrated approaches that consider socioeconomic disparities, emphasizing the need for improved infrastructure, community education, and affordable healthcare solutions to effectively mitigate the burden of Cryptosporidium infections in resource limited settings.

8. Advances in diagnostics

Microscopic analysis of fecal samples continues to be a key method for diagnosing Cryptosporidium infection, utilizing the parasite’s distinctive oocyst features as well as staining properties, for identification (102). Another approach is antigen detection assays, including enzyme immunoassays (EIAs) and rapid diagnostic tests, which detect specific Cryptosporidium antigens in stool samples, providing rapid results suitable for point-of-care settings (98). Molecular methods, such as polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and nucleic acid amplification techniques, offer high specificity and sensitivity by detecting parasite genetic material which also enable precise species identification and genotyping, which are essential for detailed epidemiological analysis and outbreak investigations (103). Future progress in diagnosing Cryptosporidium infections is expected through the use of next-generation sequencing on stool samples, which enables the simultaneous detection of multiple pathogens and their genetic variants as well as molecular diagnostic techniques are likely to become more widely adopted, though their integration into clinical laboratories will require substantial adjustments to existing workflows (98). Furthermore, emerging point of care testing (POCT) platforms utilize molecular methods such as loop mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) and nucleic acid amplification tests (NAATs) to identify Cryptosporidium DNA with high accuracy and sensitivity outside traditional laboratories (104).

9. Implementation of treatment and prophylactic measures in various settings

The adoption of therapeutic and preventive strategies for Cryptosporidium varies markedly between regions, shaped by disparities in healthcare systems, socioeconomic conditions, and environmental context. In resource-limited settings, treatment and prevention are often constrained by inadequate healthcare access and the high expense of antiparasitic agents such as nitazoxanide, limiting both therapeutic reach and prophylactic coverage (31). Furthermore, the anthroponotic subtype C. parvum IIc is predominantly found in low-income regions with poor sanitation and among HIV-positive individuals, while it is rarely observed in high-income countries. Considering the significant burden of cryptosporidiosis in low-resource settings and the pathogenic potential of related human-specific species such as C. hominis, C. parvum IIc is emerging as a key contributor to the disease (101).

10. Future directions and research priorities

10.1. Areas requiring further research

The development of novel therapeutic agents against Cryptosporidium remains a critical priority, with special emphasis on discovering innovative chemical entities and identifying unexplored molecular targets to counteract the emergence of drug-resistant strains and enhance clinical efficacy (33, 96). Research focused on phytochemical and synthetic compounds continues to be essential, requiring rigorous standardization of formulations, comprehensive evaluation of therapeutic potential (33). In parallel, vaccine development constitutes a major research frontier, aiming to elicit long-lasting protective immunity, particularly in immunocompromised and other high-risk populations (105). Progress in this domain must be accompanied by the refinement of diagnostic technologies, with a focus on producing rapid, ultra-sensitive, and field-adaptable assays capable of detecting Cryptosporidium with high specificity.

10.2. Potential impact of new technologies

10.2.1. Genomic and proteomic approaches

Recent genomic and proteomic advancements hold significant potential to enhance the understanding, diagnosis, and treatment of Cryptosporidium infections. Techniques like whole-genome sequencing and comparative genomics enable detailed characterization of species and strains, paving the way for improved disease management (106, 107). These methods reveal important insights into genetic diversity, population structure, and host–parasite interactions, which are crucial for improving molecular epidemiology and informing targeted public health interventions. Proteomic studies further characterize protein interactions, functions, and cellular pathways, supporting the identification of potential diagnostic biomarkers and informing the development of novel therapeutic strategies (106). In parallel, proteomic studies provide essential information about the full range of proteins expressed by Cryptosporidium during its different life stages. Using techniques such as mass spectrometry, critical proteins have identified which play roles in host invasion, metabolism, and immune evasion (106). This knowledge is vital for elucidating how the parasite causes disease and interacts with its host, guiding the development of more targeted therapies. Combined genomic and proteomic approaches can significantly enhance diagnostic accuracy, as genomic tests enable the highly sensitive detection of specific Cryptosporidium DNA sequences, facilitating early diagnosis and precise species identification (108). Meanwhile, proteomic profiling helps uncover new protein markers that can increase the accuracy of antigen tests and rapid detection kits. These technologies also strengthen public health monitoring and outbreak response. Additionally, genomic data help trace transmission pathways, identify sources of outbreaks, and reveal how different strains are related, all of which are key for controlling the spread of infection. However, large genomic datasets require advanced bioinformatics tools and skilled analysis. Meanwhile, using CRISPR/Cas9 in Cryptosporidium has allowed researchers to create reporter strains and directly study the function of parasite genes, opening new opportunities for drug discovery (8).

10.2.2. Artificial intelligence in drug discovery

Artificial intelligence (AI) has become a powerful catalyst in advancing both pharmaceutical research and the study of disease dynamics by utilizing sophisticated computational methods to expedite the discovery of new drugs and enhance disease monitoring systems. In drug development, AI enhances the prediction of molecular interactions and the optimization of chemical compounds, accelerating the discovery of effective therapies candidates beyond the limits of traditional approaches (109). Based on a study employing computational structure and function predictions, the identified C. hominis hypothetical protein (TU502HP) was proposed as a promising molecular target for the design of an inhibitory molecule (110). Through comprehensive analysis of extensive genomic and proteomic datasets, machine learning uncovers intricate biological patterns that inform the creation of precise therapies for cryptosporidiosis. In epidemiological investigations, explainable AI supports the real-time processing of diverse data streams and builds predictive frameworks to anticipate disease trends, recognize outbreak signals, and aid strategic public health decision-making (111). Moreover, AI might accelerate genomic investigations by swiftly examining large volumes of Cryptosporidium genetic material, pinpointing mutations linked to increased pathogenicity, resistance to treatments, and transmission characteristics. A deeper understanding of parasite biology enables the development of more precise and effective disease management strategies. However, widespread implementation of AI in this field faces challenges such as ensuring data quality, promoting algorithmic transparency, and addressing ethical concerns related to privacy and bias. Overcoming these obstacles will require interdisciplinary collaboration, robust regulatory frameworks, and ongoing innovation in AI technologies (112, 113).

11. Policy recommendations and global health strategies

Effective global health policies are essential to confront the ongoing challenge posed by Cryptosporidium infections and to improve health outcomes on a worldwide scale. Key policy priorities include enhancing disease monitoring systems to accurately assess infection dynamics, implementing strict water sanitation and hygiene standards to interrupt transmission pathways, and increasing public education to promote preventive measures and treatment awareness. International partnerships in terms of One Health approach is critical to establish unified diagnostic standards, facilitate the exchange of epidemiological information, and allocate resources efficiently to regions with high disease burden (114). Additionally, fostering innovation through support for research in therapeutics, vaccine development, and diagnostic advancement is fundamental. Integrating these elements into global health strategies strengthens resilience against Cryptosporidium, ultimately advancing public health security and reducing disease incidence across diverse populations.

12. Conclusion

Given the comprehensive examination of Cryptosporidium treatment, prophylaxis, diagnostics, and global health strategies, addressing the multifaceted challenges of Cryptosporidium infection demands a comprehensive One Health perspective that integrates human, animal, and environmental health. Progress in this field depends on expanding therapeutic options, including agents like nitazoxanide, paromomycin, and azithromycin, alongside continued research into natural compounds and novel chemical candidates, each offering distinct advantages and limitations. Enhancing diagnostic capabilities, advancing vaccine development, and applying artificial intelligence to monitor disease trends all represent valuable directions for future research and public health practice. Overcoming the burden of cryptosporidiosis also calls for strong policies, improved surveillance systems, safe water infrastructure, and effective public education to limit transmission and outbreaks. Cross-disciplinary collaboration and international cooperation remain essential to strengthen treatment success, prevent widespread infection, and reduce the overall impact of this parasite. By combining innovation, evidence-based strategies, and shared global commitment, meaningful strides can be achieved in protecting vulnerable populations and improving public health worldwide.

Funding Statement

The author(s) declared that financial support was received for this work and/or its publication. EE received support through a postdoctoral fellowship funded by the Emergia Program for attracting outstanding research talent to carry out research activities within the Andalusian Knowledge System, awarded by the University of Córdoba and financed by the Ministry of Universities, Research and Innovation through the Directorate General for Research Planning of Andalusia (DGP_EMEC_2023_00282). This study was supported by the Department of Biology, College of Sciences and Humanities, Prince Sattam Bin Abdulaziz University, Al-Kharj, Saudi Arabia. This study was supported by King Faisal University Researchers Supporting Project, King Faisal University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. This work was supported by the Deanship of Scientific Research, Vice Presidency for Graduate Research, King Faisal University, Saudi Arabia (grant no. KFU260233).

Footnotes

Edited by: Vikrant Sudan, Guru Angad Dev Veterinary and Animal Sciences University, India

Reviewed by: Qingxia Wu, Tibet Agricultural and Animal Husbandry University, China

Joyce Siwila, University of Zambia, Zambia

Kun Li, Nanjing Agricultural University, China

Author contributions

RR: Visualization, Validation, Formal analysis, Project administration, Conceptualization, Data curation, Methodology, Writing – review & editing, Investigation, Writing – original draft, Software, Supervision. AdA: Investigation, Writing – review & editing, Formal analysis, Visualization, Validation, Data curation, Supervision. ER-Á: Formal analysis, Visualization, Data curation, Validation, Investigation, Software, Supervision, Writing – review & editing. RS: Validation, Formal analysis, Project administration, Data curation, Methodology, Visualization, Conceptualization, Writing – review & editing, Writing – original draft, Investigation. QA: Data curation, Software, Formal analysis, Resources, Validation, Writing – review & editing. AEA: Formal analysis, Software, Visualization, Data curation, Writing – original draft. ASA: Data curation, Writing – original draft, Visualization, Software. AhA: Data curation, Validation, Writing – original draft, Software, Visualization. EE: Software, Project administration, Data curation, Visualization, Formal analysis, Methodology, Conceptualization, Writing – original draft, Funding acquisition, Writing – review & editing, Validation, Investigation, Resources, Supervision.

Conflict of interest

The author(s) declared that this work was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Generative AI statement

The author(s) declared that Generative AI was not used in the creation of this manuscript.

Any alternative text (alt text) provided alongside figures in this article has been generated by Frontiers with the support of artificial intelligence and reasonable efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, including review by the authors wherever possible. If you identify any issues, please contact us.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

References

  • 1.Checkley W, White AC, Jaganath D, Arrowood MJ, Chalmers RM, Chen XM, et al. A review of the global burden, novel diagnostics, therapeutics, and vaccine targets for Cryptosporidium. Lancet Infect Dis. (2015) 15:85–94. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(14)70772-8, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Kotloff KL, Nataro JP, Blackwelder WC, Nasrin D, Farag TH, Panchalingam S, et al. Burden and aetiology of diarrhoeal disease in infants and young children in developing countries (the global enteric multicenter study, gems): a prospective, case-control study. Lancet. (2013) 382:209–22. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)60844-2, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Dong S, Yang Y, Wang Y, Yang D, Yang Y, Shi Y, et al. Prevalence of Cryptosporidium infection in the global population: a systematic review and Meta-analysis. Acta Parasitol. (2020) 65:882–9. doi: 10.2478/S11686-020-00230-1, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Efstratiou A, Ongerth JE, Karanis P. Waterborne transmission of protozoan parasites: review of worldwide outbreaks - an update 2011–2016. Water Res. (2017) 114:14–22. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2017.01.036, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Troeger C, Blacker BF, Khalil IA, Rao PC, Cao S, Zimsen SR, et al. Estimates of the global, regional, and national morbidity, mortality, and aetiologies of diarrhoea in 195 countries: a systematic analysis for the global burden of disease study 2016. Lancet Infect Dis. (2018) 18:1211–28. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(18)30362-1, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Gorcea M, Neculicioiu V, Junie L. Cryptosporidium and Giardia–an overview. Sci Parasitol. (2020) 21:18–24. [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Fayer R. Taxonomy and species delimitation in Cryptosporidium. Exp Parasitol. (2010) 124:90–7. doi: 10.1016/j.exppara.2009.03.005, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Innes EA, Chalmers RM, Wells B, Pawlowic MC. A one health approach to tackle cryptosporidiosis. Trends Parasitol. (2020) 36:290–303. doi: 10.1016/j.pt.2019.12.016, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Ryan U, Zahedi A, Feng Y, Xiao L. An update on zoonotic Cryptosporidium species and genotypes in humans. Animals. (2021) 11:3307. doi: 10.3390/ani11113307, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Elmahallawy EK, Köster PC, Dashti A, Alghamdi SQ, Saleh A, Gareh A, et al. Molecular detection and characterization of Cryptosporidium Spp., Giardia Duodenalis, and Enterocytozoon Bieneusi infections in dromedary camels (Camelus dromedaries) in Egypt. Front Vet Sci. (2023) 10:1139388. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2023.1139388, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Mohamed SA, Anwar FAS, Gareh A, Ghallab MMI, Martínez R, Gouda AA, et al. First microscopic and molecular identification of Cryptosporidium Spp. in fat sand rats (Psammomys Obesus) in Egypt and their potential zoonotic implications. Front Vet Sci. (2025) 11:1488508. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2024.1488508 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Salama RY, Abdelbaset AE, Takeda Y, Imai K, Ogawa H, Igarashi M. Molecular characterization of Cryptosporidium spp. from migratory ducks around Tokachi subprefecture, Hokkaido, Japan. J Vet Med Sci. (2020) 82:571–5. doi: 10.1292/jvms.19-0586, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Wang Y, Zhang K, Chen Y, Li X, Zhang L. Cryptosporidium and cryptosporidiosis in wild birds: a one health perspective. Parasitol Res. (2021) 120:3035–44. doi: 10.1007/s00436-021-07289-3, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Peng S, Xu C, Saleem MU, Babar W, Idrees A, Li K. Epidemiological investigation of Cryptosporidium infection in yaks in Chamdo, China. Pak Vet J. (2024) 44:535–8. doi: 10.29261/pakvetj/2024.170 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Helmy YA, Hafez HM. Cryptosporidiosis: from prevention to treatment, a narrative review. Microorganisms. (2022) 10:2456. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms10122456, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Gerace E, Lo Presti VDM, Biondo C. Cryptosporidium infection: epidemiology, pathogenesis, and differential diagnosis. Eur J Microbiol Immunol (Bp). (2019) 9:119–23. doi: 10.1556/1886.2019.00019, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Shehata AA, Abd El-Emam MM, Gouda H, El-Said BM, Salman MB, Abd-Elfatah EB. Molecular characterization of Cryptosporidium infection and analysis of hematological and biochemical changes in diarrheic pre-weaned calves in Egypt. Pak Vet J. (2024) 44:135–40. Available online at: http://pvj.com.pk/pdf-files/23-186.pdf [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Das K, Nair LV, Ghosal A, Sardar SK, Dutta S, Ganguly S. Genetic characterization reveals evidence for an association between water contamination and zoonotic transmission of a Cryptosporidium Sp. from dairy cattle in West Bengal, India. Food Waterborne Parasitol. (2019) 17:e00064. doi: 10.1016/j.fawpar.2019.e00064, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Zhang K, Fu Y, Li J, Zhang L. Public health and ecological significance of rodents in Cryptosporidium infections. One Health. (2022) 14:100364. doi: 10.1016/j.onehlt.2021.100364, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Certad G, Viscogliosi E, Chabé M, Cacciò SM. Pathogenic mechanisms of Cryptosporidium and Giardia. Trends Parasitol. (2017) 33:561–76. doi: 10.1016/j.pt.2017.02.006, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Pumipuntu N, Piratae S. Cryptosporidiosis: a zoonotic disease concern. Vet World. (2018) 11:681–6. doi: 10.14202/vetworld.2018.681-686, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Ayan A, Celik BA, Celik OY, Akyildiz G, Kilinc OO, Ayan OO, et al. First report of zoonotic Cryptosporidium Parvum subtype IIaA15G2R1 in dogs in Türkiye. Pak Vet J. (2024) 44:1263–8. doi: 10.29261/pakvetj/2024.274 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Lei W, Sijia L, Wen Z, Na S, Saleem MU, Nazar M, et al. The effects of Cryptosporidium infection on Gut Fungi and enzyme abundance in Sus Domesticus. Asian J Agricul Biol. (2023) 2023114. doi: 10.35495/ajab.2023.114 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Rossignol JF. "Drug treatment and novel drug targets against Giardia and Cryptosporidium" In: Ortega-Pierres G, Cacciò SM, Fayer R, Mank TG, Smith HV, Thompson RCA. (eds.) Giardia and Cryptosporidium: From molecules to diseases. Wallingford, UK; Cambridge, MA: CABI; (2009). 463–82. [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Giacometti A, Burzacchini F, Cirioni O, Barchiesi F, Dini M, Scalise G. Efficacy of treatment with paromomycin, azithromycin, and nitazoxanide in a patient with disseminated cryptosporidiosis. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. (1999) 18:885–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Schneider A, Wendt S, Lübbert C, Trawinski H. Current pharmacotherapy of cryptosporidiosis: an update of the state-of-the-art. Expert Opin Pharmacother. (2021) 22:2337–42. doi: 10.1080/14656566.2021.1957097, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Nguyen-Ho-bao T, Ambe LA, Berberich M, Hermosilla C, Taubert A, Daugschies A, et al. Octaarginine improves the efficacy of nitazoxanide against Cryptosporidium parvum. Pathogens. (2022) 11:653. doi: 10.3390/PATHOGENS11060653, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Elmansory BM, Zalat RS, Khaled E, Taha NM. Efficacy of nitazoxanide, ivermectin and albendazole in treatment of cryptosporidiosis in immunosuppressed mice. J Parasit Dis. (2025) 49:343–50. doi: 10.1007/s12639-024-01751-6, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Amadi B, Mwiya M, Musuku J, Watuka A, Sianongo S, Ayoub A, et al. Effect of nitazoxanide on morbidity and mortality in Zambian children with cryptosporidiosis: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. (2002) 360:1375–80. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(02)11401-2, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Khan SM, Witola WH. Past, current, and potential treatments for cryptosporidiosis in humans and farm animals: a comprehensive review. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. (2023) 13:1115522. doi: 10.3389/FCIMB.2023.1115522, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Amadi B, Mwiya M, Sianongo S, Payne L, Watuka A, Katubulushi M, et al. High dose prolonged treatment with Nitazoxanide is not effective for cryptosporidiosis in Hiv positive Zambian children: a randomised controlled trial. BMC Infect Dis. (2009) 9:195. doi: 10.1186/1471-2334-9-195, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Widmer G, Carmena D, Kváč M, Chalmers RM, Kissinger JC, Xiao L, et al. Update on Cryptosporidium spp.: highlights from the seventh international Giardia and Cryptosporidium conference. Parasite. (2020) 27:14. doi: 10.1051/parasite/2020011, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Lenière A-C, Vlandas A, Follet J. Treating cryptosporidiosis: a review on drug discovery strategies. Int J Parasitol Drugs Drug Resist. (2024) 25:100542. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpddr.2024.100542, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Masood S, Maqbool A, Khan UJ, Chaudhry ZI, Anjum AA. Anti-Cryptosporidium activity of albendazole, metronidazole and paromomycin in experimentally infected cattle. Pak J Zool. (2013) 45:935–40. [Google Scholar]
  • 35.White AC, Cron SG, Chappell CL. Paromomycin in cryptosporidiosis. Clin Infect Dis. (2001) 32:1516–7. doi: 10.1086/320171, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Tzipori S, Rand W, Griffiths J, Widmer G, Crabb J. Evaluation of an animal model system for cryptosporidiosis: therapeutic efficacy of Paromomycin and Hyperimmune bovine colostrum-immunoglobulin. Clin Diagn Lab Immunol. (1994) 1:450–63. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Hong DK, Wong CJ, Gutierrez K. Severe cryptosporidiosis in a seven-year-old renal transplant recipient: case report and review of the literature. Pediatr Transplant. (2007) 11:94–100. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-3046.2006.00593.x, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Kadappu KK, Nagaraja MV, Rao PV, Shastry BA. Azithromycin as treatment for cryptosporidiosis in human immunodeficiency virus disease. J Postgrad Med. (2002) 48:179–81. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.De Waele V, Speybroeck N, Berkvens D, Mulcahy G, Murphy TM. Control of cryptosporidiosis in neonatal calves: use of Halofuginone lactate in two different calf rearing systems. Prev Vet Med. (2010) 96:143–51. doi: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2010.06.017, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Aydogdu U, Isik N, Ekici OD, Yildiz R, Sen I, Coskun A. Comparison of the effectiveness of halofuginone lactate and paromomycin in the treatment of calves naturally infected with Cryptosporidium Parvum. Acta Sci Vet. (2018) 46:9. doi: 10.22456/1679-9216.81809 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Rideout H, Cook AJC, Whetton AD. Understanding the Cryptosporidium species and their challenges to animal health and livestock species for informed development of new, specific treatment strategies. Front Parasitol. (2024) 3:1448076. doi: 10.3389/fpara.2024.1448076, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Coghi PS, Zhu Y, Xie H, Hosmane NS, Zhang Y. Organoboron compounds: effective antibacterial and Antiparasitic agents. Molecules. (2021) 26:3309. doi: 10.3390/MOLECULES26113309, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Lunde CS, Stebbins EE, Jumani RS, Hasan MM, Miller P, Barlow J, et al. Identification of a potent Benzoxaborole drug candidate for treating cryptosporidiosis. Nat Commun. (2019) 10:2816. doi: 10.1038/S41467-019-10687-Y, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Manjunatha UH, Vinayak S, Zambriski JA, Chao AT, Sy T, Noble CG, et al. A cryptosporidium pi(4)K inhibitor is a drug candidate for cryptosporidiosis. Nature. (2017) 546:376–80. doi: 10.1038/NATURE22337, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Li G, Wu Y, Zhang Y, Wang H, Li M, He D, et al. Research Progress on phosphatidylinositol 4-kinase inhibitors. Biochem Pharmacol. (2024) 220:115993. doi: 10.1016/J.BCP.2023.115993, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.McPhail JA, Burke JE. Drugging the phosphoinositide 3-kinase (Pi3k) and phosphatidylinositol 4-kinase (Pi4k) family of enzymes for treatment of Cancer, immune disorders, and viral/parasitic infections. Adv Exp Med Biol. (2020) 1274:203–22. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-50621-6_9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Khan SM, Zhang X, Witola WH. Cryptosporidium parvum pyruvate kinase inhibitors with in vivo anti-cryptosporidial efficacy. Front Microbiol. (2022) 12:800293. doi: 10.3389/FMICB.2021.800293, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.McCowin S, Marie C. "The role of host Pkcα during intracellular Cryptosporidium infection" In: Eukaryome impact on human intestine homeostasis and mucosal immunology. Cham: Springer International Publishing; (2020). 213–23. [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Potiron L, Lacroix-Lamandé S, Marquis M, Levern Y, Fort G, Franceschini I, et al. Batf3-dependent intestinal dendritic cells play a critical role in the control of Cryptosporidium Parvum infection. J Infect Dis. (2019) 219:925–35. doi: 10.1093/INFDIS/JIY528, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Dumaine JE, Sateriale A, Gibson AR, Reddy AG, Gullicksrud JA, Hunter EN, et al. The enteric pathogen Cryptosporidium Parvum exports proteins into the cytosol of the infected host cell. eLife. (2021) 10:e70451. doi: 10.7554/eLife.70451, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Farid A, Yousry M, Safwat G. Garlic (Allium Sativum Linnaeus) improved inflammation and reduced cryptosporidiosis burden in immunocompromised mice. J Ethnopharmacol. (2022) 292:115174. doi: 10.1016/j.jep.2022.115174, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Elbahaie ES, El Gamal RL, Fathy GM, Al-Ghandour AMF, El-Akabawy N, El Hameed BHA, et al. The controverted therapeutic efficacy of allium sativum and artemisia herba-alba extracts on Cryptosporidium-infected mice. J Infect Dev Ctries. (2023) 17:732–43. doi: 10.3855/JIDC.17360 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Sadek HA, Abdel-Rahman SM, Bakir HY, Arafa MI, Ahmed AA, Gareh AA, et al. The potential convention of garlic and black seed different extracts as an effective treatment of Cryptosporidium spp.: an experimental study. J Egypt Soc Parasitol. (2020) 50:613–21. doi: 10.21608/JESP.2020.131094 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Harris JC, Cottrell SL, Plummer S, Lloyd D. Antimicrobial properties of allium sativum (garlic). Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. (2001) 57:282–6. doi: 10.1007/S002530100722, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Iqbal T, Altaf S, Fatima M, Rasheed R, Laraib K, Azam M, et al. A narrative review on effective use of medicinal plants for the treatment of parasitic foodborne diseases. Agrobiol Rec. (2024) 16:79–92. doi: 10.47278/journal.abr/2024.016 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Ehteshamfar SM, Akhbari M, Afshari JT, Seyedi M, Nikfar B, Shapouri-Moghaddam A, et al. Anti-inflammatory and immune-modulatory impacts of berberine on activation of autoreactive T cells in autoimmune inflammation. J Cell Mol Med. (2020) 24:13573–88. doi: 10.1111/jcmm.16049 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Tavakkoli A, Mahdian V, Razavi BB, Hosseinzadeh H. Review on clinical trials of black seed (Nigella sativa) and its active constituent, thymoquinone. Aust J Pharm. (2017) 20:179–93. doi: 10.3831/KPI.2017.20.021, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Thakur S, Kaurav H, Chaudhary G. Nigella sativa (kalonji): a black seed of miracle. Int J Res Rev. (2021) 8:342–57. doi: 10.52403/ijrr.20210441 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Yahia SH, El gamal RL, Fathy GM, Al-Ghandour AMF, El-Akabawy N, Abdel-Hameed BH, et al. The potential therapeutic effect of Nigella sativa and Zingiber officinale extracts versus nitazoxanide drug against experimentally induced cryptosporidiosis in laboratory mice. J Parasit Dis. (2023) 47:329–39. doi: 10.1007/S12639-023-01572-Z, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Haq A, Lobo PI, Al-Tufail M, Rama NR, Al-Sedairy ST. Immunomodulatory effect of Nigella Sativa proteins fractionated by ion exchange chromatography. Int J Immunopharmacol. (1999) 21:283–95. doi: 10.1016/S0192-0561(99)00010-7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Rahman SU, Zhou K, Zhou SS, Sun T, Mi R, Huang Y, et al. Curcumin mitigates Cryptosporidium Parvum infection through modulation of Gut microbiota and innate immune-related genes in immunosuppressed neonatal mice. Microb Pathog. (2022) 164:105424. doi: 10.1016/J.MICPATH.2022.105424, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Soleimani V, Sahebkar A, Hosseinzadeh H. Turmeric (Curcuma Longa) and its major constituent (curcumin) as nontoxic and safe substances: review. Phytother Res. (2018) 32:985–95. doi: 10.1002/PTR.6054, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Mohammed LS, Sallam EA, El Basuni SS, Eldiarby AS, Soliman MM, Aboelenin SM, et al. Ameliorative effect of neem leaf and pomegranate peel extracts in coccidial infections in New Zealand and V-line rabbits: performance, intestinal health, oocyst shedding, carcass traits and effect on economic measures. Animals. (2021) 11:2441. doi: 10.3390/ANI11082441, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Maran BAV, Josmeh D, Tan JK, Yong YS, Shah MD. Efficacy of the aqueous extract of Azadirachta indica against the marine parasitic leech and its phytochemical profiling. Molecules. (2021) 26:1908. doi: 10.3390/MOLECULES26071908, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Mac Kenzie WR, Hoxie NJ, Proctor ME, Gradus MS, Blair KA, Peterson DE, et al. A massive outbreak in Milwaukee of Cryptosporidium infection transmitted through the public water supply. N Engl J Med. (1994) 331:161–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Hlavsa MC, Rvkahedmtbm, Yjs. Outbreaks of illness associated with recreational water—United States, 2011–2012. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. (2015) 64:668–72. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Golomazou E, Mamedova S, Eslahi AV, Karanis P. Cryptosporidium and Agriculture: A Review. Sci Total Environ. (2024) 916:170057. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.170057, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Ali M, Ji Y, Xu C, Hina Q, Javed U, Li K. Food and waterborne cryptosporidiosis from a one health perspective: a comprehensive review. Animals. (2024) 14:3287. doi: 10.3390/ani14223287 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Kuczynska E, Shelton DR. Method for detection and enumeration of Cryptosporidium Parvum oocysts in feces, manures, and soils. Appl Environ Microbiol. (1999) 65:2820–6. doi: 10.1128/AEM.65.7.2820-2826.1999 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Painter JE, Hlavsa MC, Collier SA, Xiao L, Yoder JS. Cryptosporidiosis surveillance -- United States, 2011-2012. MMWR Suppl. (2015) 64:1–14. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Murphy JL, Haas CN, Arrowood MJ, Hlavsa MC, Beach MJ, Hill VR. Efficacy of chlorine dioxide tablets on inactivation of Cryptosporidium oocysts. Environ Sci Technol. (2014) 48:5849–56. doi: 10.1021/ES500644D, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Jefri U, Khan A, Lim YC, Lee KS, Liew KB, Kassab YW, et al. A systematic review on chlorine dioxide as a disinfectant. J Med Life. (2022) 15:313–8. doi: 10.25122/JML-2021-0180, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Chauret CP, Radziminski CZ, Lepuil M, Creason R, Andrews RC. Chlorine dioxide inactivation of Cryptosporidium Parvum oocysts and bacterial spore indicators. Appl Environ Microbiol. (2001) 67:2993–3001. doi: 10.1128/aem.67.7.2993-3001.2001, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Gray N. "Ozone disinfection" In: Percival SL, Yates MV, Williams DW, Chalmers RM, Gray NF. (eds.) Microbiology of waterborne diseases: Academic press; (2014). 599–615. [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Pereira JT, Costa AO, de Oliveira Silva MB, Schuchard W, Osaki SC, de Castro EA, et al. Comparing the efficacy of chlorine, chlorine dioxide, and ozone in the inactivation of Cryptosporidium Parvum in water from Parana state, southern Brazil. Appl Biochem Biotechnol. (2008) 151:464–73. doi: 10.1007/s12010-008-8214-3 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Rennecker JL, Driedger AM, Rubin SA, Mariñas BJ. Synergy in sequential inactivation of Cryptosporidium Parvum with ozone/free chlorine and ozone/monochloramine. Water Res. (2000) 34:4121–30. [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Abdelshafy AM, Neetoo H, Al-Asmari F. Antimicrobial activity of hydrogen peroxide for application in food safety and Covid-19 mitigation: an updated review. J Food Prot. (2024) 87:100306. doi: 10.1016/j.jfp.2024.100306, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Kniel KE, Sumner SS, Lindsay DS, Hackney CR, Pierson MD, Zajac AM, et al. Effect of organic acids and hydrogen peroxide on Cryptosporidium Parvum viability in fruit juices. J Food Prot. (2003) 66:1650–7. doi: 10.4315/0362-028X-66.9.1650, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Matavos-Aramyan S, Moussavi M, Matavos-Aramyan H, Roozkhosh S. Cryptosporidium-contaminated water disinfection by a novel Fenton process. Free Radic Biol Med. (2017) 106:158–67. doi: 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2017.02.030, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Nasser AM. "Inactivation of Cryptosporidium by advanced oxidation processes" In: Gil A, Galeano L, Vicente M. (eds.) The handbook of environmental chemistry. Cham, Switzerland: Springer, (2017) 67:199–215. [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Kniel KE, Sumner SS, Pierson MD, Zajac AM, Hackney CR, Fayer R, et al. Effect of hydrogen peroxide and other protease inhibitors on Cryptosporidium parvum excystation and in vitro development. J Parasitol. (2004) 90:885–8. doi: 10.1645/GE-203R1, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Desai AN. Cryptosporidiosis. JAMA. (2020) 323:288. doi: 10.1001/jama.2019.18691, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Abate D, Tschopp R, Seyoum B, Dessie Y, Hasen MO, Gemechu G, et al. Cryptosporidium infection and associated factors among diarrheic children under five years of age in eastern Ethiopia. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. (2025) 19:e0013386. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0013386, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Alberfkani MI, Swar SO, Almutairi LA, Hasan HK, Ahmed AE, Khalid HM, et al. Molecular characterization and phylogenetic analysis of 18s Rrna, Gp60 and Hsp70 genes of Cryptosporidium Parvum isolated from cattle owners and cattle using nested Pcr. Pak Vet J. (2024) 44:1237–42. doi: 10.29261/pakvetj/2024.281 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Silva DRR, Oliveira TCB, Marta BBF, Baptista CB, Bottaro MCZ, Bresciani KDS. Vaccine development for cryptosporidiosis: systematic review. Res, Society Develop. (2021) 10:e18910615540. doi: 10.33448/RSD-V10I6.15540 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Avendaño C, Jenkins M, Méndez-Callejas G, Oviedo J, Guzmán F, Patarroyo MA, et al. Cryptosporidium Spp. Cp15 and Csl protein-derived synthetic peptides’ immunogenicity and in vitro seroneutralisation capability. Vaccine. (2018) 36:6703–10. doi: 10.1016/J.VACCINE.2018.09.044, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Timmermans M, Hubers W, Schroer D, Gevers K, Segers RP, Niessen R, et al. The first commercially approved efficacious Cryptosporidium vaccine protecting new-born calves from severe diarrhea. Vet Vaccine. (2024) 3:100054. doi: 10.1016/J.VETVAC.2024.100054 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Rahman SU, Mi R, Zhou S, Gong H, Ullah M, Huang Y, et al. Advances in therapeutic and vaccine targets for Cryptosporidium: challenges and possible mitigation strategies. Acta Trop. (2022) 226:106273. doi: 10.1016/J.ACTATROPICA.2021.106273, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89.Mead JR. Editorial: challenges and prospects for a Cryptosporidium vaccine. Future Microbiol. (2010) 5:335: 337. doi: 10.2217/FMB.09.115 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90.Tomazic ML, Rodriguez AE, Lombardelli J, Poklepovich T, Garro C, Galarza R, et al. Identification of novel vaccine candidates against cryptosporidiosis of neonatal bovines by reverse vaccinology. Vet Parasitol. (2018) 264:74–8. doi: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2018.11.007, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91.Pandya N, Kumar A. A multi-epitope vaccine candidate developed from unique immunogenic epitopes against Cryptosporidium Hominis by utilizing an Immunoinformatics-driven approach. J Biomol Struct Dyn. (2023) 41:4614–31. doi: 10.1080/07391102.2022.2070284, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92.Dhal AK, Pani A, Mahapatra RK, Yun SIL. An Immunoinformatics approach for design and validation of multi-subunit vaccine against Cryptosporidium Parvum. Immunobiology. (2019) 224:747–57. doi: 10.1016/j.imbio.2019.09.001, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 93.de Graaf DC, Spano F, Petry F, Sagodira S, Bonnin A. Speculation on whether a vaccine against cryptosporidiosis is a reality or fantasy. Int J Parasitol. (1999) 29:1289–306. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 94.Jumani RS, Blais J, Tillmann HC, Segal F, Wetty D, Ostermeier C, et al. Opportunities and challenges in developing a Cryptosporidium controlled human infection model for testing Antiparasitic agents. ACS Infect Dis. (2021) 7:959–68. doi: 10.1021/ACSINFECDIS.1C00057, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 95.Zhang Y, Jiang P, Yin J, Zhu G. Pathogenicity and virulence of Cryptosporidium. Virulence. (2025) 16:2597642. doi: 10.1080/21505594.2025.2597642, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 96.Hasan MM, Stebbins EE, Choy RKM, Robert Gillespie J, de Hostos EL, Miller P, et al. Spontaneous selection of Cryptosporidium drug resistance in a calf model of infection. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. (2021) 65:e00023-21. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00023-21 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 97.Yang B, Yan Y, Wang D, Zhang Y, Yin J, Zhu G. On-target inhibition of Cryptosporidium Parvum by nitazoxanide (Ntz) and paclitaxel (Ptx) validated using a novel Mdr1-transgenic host cell model and algorithms to quantify the effect on the parasite target. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. (2023) 17:e0011217. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0011217, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 98.Chalmers RM, Katzer F. Looking for Cryptosporidium: the application of advances in detection and diagnosis. Trends Parasitol. (2013) 29:237–51. doi: 10.1016/j.pt.2013.03.001, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 99.Morada M, Lee S, Gunther-Cummins L, Weiss LM, Widmer G, Tzipori S, et al. Continuous culture of Cryptosporidium Parvum using hollow Fiber technology. Int J Parasitol. (2016) 46:21–9. doi: 10.1016/J.IJPARA.2015.07.006, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 100.DeCicco RePass MA, Chen Y, Lin Y, Zhou W, Kaplan DL, Warda HD. Novel bioengineered three-dimensional human intestinal model for long-term infection of Cryptosporidium parvum. Infect Immun. (2017) 85:e00731-16. doi: 10.1128/IAI.00731-16 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 101.King P, Tyler KM, Hunter PR. Anthroponotic transmission of Cryptosporidium Parvum predominates in countries with poorer sanitation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Parasit Vectors. (2019) 12:16. doi: 10.1186/S13071-018-3263-0, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 102.Cacciò SM, Chalmers RM. Human cryptosporidiosis in Europe. Clin Microbiol Infect. (2016) 22:471–80. doi: 10.1016/J.CMI.2016.04.021, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 103.Araújo RS, Dropa M, Fernandes LN, Carvalho TT, Sato MI, Soares RM, et al. Genotypic characterization of Cryptosporidium hominis from water samples in São Paulo, Brazil. Am J Trop Med Hyg. (2011) 85:834–8. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.2011.10-0449, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 104.Hijjawi N, Zahedi A, Ryan U. Point of care diagnostics for Cryptosporidium: new and emerging technologies. Curr Opin Gastroenterol. (2023) 39:3–8. doi: 10.1097/mog.0000000000000895, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 105.Gilchrist CA, Campo JJ, Pablo JV, Ma JZ, Teng A, Oberai A, et al. Specific Cryptosporidium antigens associate with reinfection immunity and protection from cryptosporidiosis. J Clin Invest. (2023) 133:e166814. doi: 10.1172/JCI166814, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 106.Dąbrowska J, Sroka J, Cencek T. Investigating Cryptosporidium spp. using genomic, proteomic and transcriptomic techniques: current progress and future directions. Int J Mol Sci. (2023) 24:12867. doi: 10.3390/ijms241612867, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 107.Roellig DM, Xiao L. "Cryptosporidium genotyping for epidemiology tracking" In: Mead J, Arrowood M. (eds.) Cryptosporidium: Methods and protocols. New York (NY): Springer; (2019). 103–16. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4939-9748-0_7 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 108.Xu Z, Li N, Guo Y, Feng Y, Xiao L. Comparative genomic analysis of three intestinal species reveals reductions in secreted pathogenesis determinants in bovine-specific and non-pathogenic Cryptosporidium species. Microb Genom. (2020) 6:e000379. doi: 10.1099/MGEN.0.000379, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 109.Aliper A, Kudrin R, Polykovskiy D, Kamya P, Tutubalina E, Chen S, et al. Prediction of clinical trials outcomes based on target choice and clinical trial design with multi-modal artificial intelligence. Clin Pharmacol Ther. (2023) 114:972–80. doi: 10.1002/CPT.3008, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 110.Shrivastava AK, Kumar S, Sahu PS, Mahapatra RK. In silico identification and validation of a novel hypothetical protein in Cryptosporidium Hominis and virtual screening of inhibitors as therapeutics. Parasitol Res. (2017) 116:1533–44. doi: 10.1007/s00436-017-5430-1, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 111.Ligda P, Mittas N, Kyzas GZ, Claerebout E, Sotiraki S. Machine learning and explainable artificial intelligence for the prevention of waterborne cryptosporidiosis and Giardiosis. Water Res. (2024) 262:122110. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2024.122110, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 112.Karaman U, Çiçek İ. Determination of Cryptosporidium spp. risk factors using multilayer perceptron neural network and radial based functional artificial neural network method. J Cognitive Syst. (2020) 5:83–7. [Google Scholar]
  • 113.Hu RS, Hesham AEL, Zou Q. Machine learning and its applications for protozoal pathogens and protozoal infectious diseases. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. (2022) 12:882995. doi: 10.3389/FCIMB.2022.882995 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 114.Ghazy RM, Alshaikhi SA, Assiri HAH, Almozaini AA, Alhazmi AF, Elhasaneen HEM, et al. Tropical diseases and the gastrointestinal tract: an overlooked connection. Front Trop Dis. (2025) 6:1612952. doi: 10.3389/fitd.2025.1612952 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 115.Ndao M, Nath-Chowdhury M, Sajid M, Marcus V, Mashiyama ST, Sakanari J, et al. A cysteine protease inhibitor rescues mice from a lethal Cryptosporidium Parvum infection. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. (2013) 57:6063–73. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00734-13, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 116.Kadhum HA, Shlash SA. Study effect of clarithromycin drug on Cryptosporidium Parvum and efficiency of Elisa technique in diagnosis comparison with some traditional methods in vitro. Indian J Forensic Med Toxicol. (2020) 14:845–50. doi: 10.37506/IJFMT.V14I1.158 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 117.Holmberg SD, Moorman AC, Von Bargen JC, Palella FJ, Loveless MO, Ward DJ, et al. Possible effectiveness of clarithromycin and rifabutin for cryptosporidiosis chemoprophylaxis in Hiv disease. JAMA. (1998) 279:384–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 118.Akinbo FO, Okaka CE, Omoregie R, Adamu H, Xiao L. Unusual Enterocytozoon Bieneusi genotypes and Cryptosporidium Hominis subtypes in Hiv-infected patients on highly active antiretroviral therapy. Am J Trop Med Hyg. (2013) 89:157–61. doi: 10.4269/AJTMH.12-0635, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 119.Preidis GA, Wang HC, Lewis DE, Castellanos-Gonzalez A, Rogers KA, Graviss EA, et al. Seropositive human subjects produce interferon gamma after stimulation with recombinant Cryptosporidium Hominis Gp15. Am J Trop Med Hyg. (2007) 77:583–5. doi: 10.4269/AJTMH.2007.77.583, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 120.Cui Z, Wang L, Wang Y, Li J, Wang R, Sun M, et al. Cryptosporidium parvum Gp40/15 is associated with the parasitophorous vacuole membrane and is a potential vaccine target. Microorganisms. (2020) 8:363. doi: 10.3390/MICROORGANISMS8030363, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 121.Bedi B, Mead JR. Cryptosporidium parvum antigens induce mouse and human dendritic cells to generate Th1-enhancing cytokines. Parasite Immunol. (2012) 34:473–85. doi: 10.1111/J.1365-3024.2012.01382.X, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 122.Singh I, Theodos C, Tzipori S. Recombinant proteins of Cryptosporidium Parvum induce proliferation of mesenteric lymph node cells in infected mice. Infect Immun. (2005) 73:5245–8. doi: 10.1128/IAI.73.8.5245-5248.2005, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 123.Benitez A, Priest JW, Ehigiator HN, McNair N, Mead JR. Evaluation of DNA encoding acidic ribosomal protein P2 of Cryptosporidium Parvum as a potential vaccine candidate for cryptosporidiosis. Vaccine. (2011) 29:9239–45. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2011.09.094, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 124.Lai O, Morris C, Ahmed S, Karim MM, Khan W, Ward H, et al. Serum antibody responses to polymorphic Cryptosporidium mucin antigen in Bangladeshi children with cryptosporidiosis. Am J Trop Med Hyg. (2011) 85:464–70. doi: 10.4269/AJTMH.2011.11-0270, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 125.Manque PA, Tenjo F, Woehlbier U, Lara AM, Serrano MG, Xu P, et al. Identification and immunological characterization of three potential Vaccinogens against Cryptosporidium species. Clin Vaccine Immunol. (2011) 18:1796–802. doi: 10.1128/CVI.05197-11, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 126.Ichikawa-Seki M, Fereig RM, Masatani T, Kinami A, Takahashi Y, Kida K, et al. Development of Cpgp15 recombinant antigen of Cryptosporidium parvum for detection of the specific antibodies in cattle. Parasitol Int. (2019) 69:8–12. doi: 10.1016/J.PARINT.2018.10.013, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 127.Kappe S, Bruderer T, Gantt S, Fujioka H, Nussenzweig V, Ménard R. Conservation of a gliding motility and cell invasion machinery in apicomplexan parasites. J Cell Biol. (1999) 147:937–44. doi: 10.1083/jcb.147.5.937 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 128.Bouzid M, Hunter PR, Chalmers RM, Tyler KM. Cryptosporidium pathogenicity and virulence. Clin Microbiol Rev. (2013) 26:115–34. doi: 10.1128/CMR.00076-12, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 129.Spano F, Putignani L, Naitza S, Puri C, Wright S, Crisanti A. Molecular cloning and expression analysis of a Cryptosporidium parvum gene encoding a new member of the thrombospondin family. Mol Biochem Parasitol. (1998) 92:147–62. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 130.Boulter-Bitzer JI, Lee H, Trevors JT. Molecular targets for detection and immunotherapy in Cryptosporidium Parvum. Biotechnol Adv. (2007) 25:13–44. doi: 10.1016/j.biotechadv.2006.08.003, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 131.Deng M, Templeton TJ, London NR, Bauer C, Schroeder AA, Abrahamsen MS. Cryptosporidium Parvum genes containing thrombospondin type 1 domains. Infect Immun. (2002) 70:6987–95. doi: 10.1128/IAI.70.12.6987-6995.2002, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 132.Jaskiewicz JJ, Tremblay JM, Tzipori S, Shoemaker CB. Identification and characterization of a new 34 Kda morn motif-containing sporozoite surface-exposed protein, Cp-P34, unique to Cryptosporidium. Int J Parasitol. (2021) 51:761–75. doi: 10.1016/J.IJPARA.2021.01.003, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Frontiers in Veterinary Science are provided here courtesy of Frontiers Media SA

RESOURCES