Skip to main content
PMC home page
Biophysical Journal logoLink to Biophysical Journal
. 2002 May;82(5):2466–2475. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(02)75589-6

Site-directed mutagenesis of tyrosine 118 within the central constriction site of the LamB (Maltoporin) channel of Escherichia coli. I. Effect on ion transport.

Frank Orlik 1, Christian Andersen 1, Roland Benz 1
PMCID: PMC1302036  PMID: 11964234

Abstract

The three-dimensional structure of the malto-oligosaccharide-specific LamB-channel of Escherichia coli (also called maltoporin) is known from x-ray crystallography. The central constriction of the channel formed by the external loop 3 is controlled by a tyrosine residue (Y118). Y118 was replaced by site-directed mutagenesis by ten other amino acids (alanine, isoleucine, asparagine, serine, cysteine, aspartic acid, arginine, histidine, phenylalanine, and tryptophane) including neutral ones, negatively and positively charged amino acids to study the effect of their size, hydrophobicity, and charge on ion transport through LamB. The mutant proteins were purified to homogeneity. They were reconstituted into lipid bilayer membranes and single-channel conductance and ion selectivity were measured to get insight into the mechanism of ion transport through LamB. The mutation of Y118 to any other nonaromatic amino acid led to a substantial increase of the single-channel conductance by more than a factor of six at maximum. The highest effect was observed for Y118D. Additionally, a nonlinear relationship between the salt concentration in the aqueous phase and the channel conductance was observed for this mutant, indicating strong discrete charge effects on ion conductance. For all other mutants, with the exception of Y118R, linear relationships were found between single-channel conductance and bulk aqueous concentration. The individual hydrophobicity indices of the amino acids introduced inside the central constriction of the LamB channel had a somewhat smaller effect on the single-channel conductance as compared with the effect of their size and charge.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (276.1 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Benz R., Janko K., Boos W., Läuger P. Formation of large, ion-permeable membrane channels by the matrix protein (porin) of Escherichia coli. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1978 Aug 17;511(3):305–319. doi: 10.1016/0005-2736(78)90269-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Benz R., Janko K., Läuger P. Ionic selectivity of pores formed by the matrix protein (porin) of Escherichia coli. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1979 Mar 8;551(2):238–247. doi: 10.1016/0005-2736(89)90002-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Benz R., Maier E., Ladant D., Ullmann A., Sebo P. Adenylate cyclase toxin (CyaA) of Bordetella pertussis. Evidence for the formation of small ion-permeable channels and comparison with HlyA of Escherichia coli. J Biol Chem. 1994 Nov 4;269(44):27231–27239. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Benz R., Schmid A., Nakae T., Vos-Scheperkeuter G. H. Pore formation by LamB of Escherichia coli in lipid bilayer membranes. J Bacteriol. 1986 Mar;165(3):978–986. doi: 10.1128/jb.165.3.978-986.1986. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Benz R., Schmid A., Vos-Scheperkeuter G. H. Mechanism of sugar transport through the sugar-specific LamB channel of Escherichia coli outer membrane. J Membr Biol. 1987;100(1):21–29. doi: 10.1007/BF02209137. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Clune A., Lee K. S., Ferenci T. Affinity engineering of maltoporin: variants with enhanced affinity for particular ligands. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1984 May 31;121(1):34–40. doi: 10.1016/0006-291x(84)90684-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Dani J. A. Ion-channel entrances influence permeation. Net charge, size, shape, and binding considerations. Biophys J. 1986 Mar;49(3):607–618. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(86)83688-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Dutzler R., Wang Y. F., Rizkallah P., Rosenbusch J. P., Schirmer T. Crystal structures of various maltooligosaccharides bound to maltoporin reveal a specific sugar translocation pathway. Structure. 1996 Feb 15;4(2):127–134. doi: 10.1016/s0969-2126(96)00016-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Ferenci T., Lee K. S. Directed evolution of the lambda receptor of Escherichia coli through affinity chromatographic selection. J Mol Biol. 1982 Sep 25;160(3):431–444. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(82)90306-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Forst D., Welte W., Wacker T., Diederichs K. Structure of the sucrose-specific porin ScrY from Salmonella typhimurium and its complex with sucrose. Nat Struct Biol. 1998 Jan;5(1):37–46. doi: 10.1038/nsb0198-37. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Heine H. G., Francis G., Lee K. S., Ferenci T. Genetic analysis of sequences in maltoporin that contribute to binding domains and pore structure. J Bacteriol. 1988 Apr;170(4):1730–1738. doi: 10.1128/jb.170.4.1730-1738.1988. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Jordan P. C. How pore mouth charge distributions alter the permeability of transmembrane ionic channels. Biophys J. 1987 Feb;51(2):297–311. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(87)83336-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Jordy M., Andersen C., Schülein K., Ferenci T., Benz R. Rate constants of sugar transport through two LamB mutants of Escherichia coli: comparison with wild-type maltoporin and LamB of Salmonella typhimurium. J Mol Biol. 1996 Jun 21;259(4):666–678. doi: 10.1006/jmbi.1996.0348. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Kyte J., Doolittle R. F. A simple method for displaying the hydropathic character of a protein. J Mol Biol. 1982 May 5;157(1):105–132. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(82)90515-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Luckey M., Nikaido H. Diffusion of solutes through channels produced by phage lambda receptor protein of Escherichia coli: inhibition by higher oligosaccharides of maltose series. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1980 Mar 13;93(1):166–171. doi: 10.1016/s0006-291x(80)80261-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. MacKinnon R., Latorre R., Miller C. Role of surface electrostatics in the operation of a high-conductance Ca2+-activated K+ channel. Biochemistry. 1989 Oct 3;28(20):8092–8099. doi: 10.1021/bi00446a020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Maier E., Reinhard N., Benz R., Frey J. Channel-forming activity and channel size of the RTX toxins ApxI, ApxII, and ApxIII of Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae. Infect Immun. 1996 Nov;64(11):4415–4423. doi: 10.1128/iai.64.11.4415-4423.1996. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Menestrina G., Antolini R. Ion transport through hemocyanin channels in oxidized cholesterol artificial bilayer membranes. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1981 May 20;643(3):616–625. doi: 10.1016/0005-2736(81)90357-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Meyer J. E., Hofnung M., Schulz G. E. Structure of maltoporin from Salmonella typhimurium ligated with a nitrophenyl-maltotrioside. J Mol Biol. 1997 Mar 7;266(4):761–775. doi: 10.1006/jmbi.1996.0823. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Nelson A. P., McQuarrie D. A. The effect of discrete charges on the electrical properties of a membrane. I. J Theor Biol. 1975 Nov;55(1):13–27. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5193(75)80106-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Nikaido H. Porins and specific channels of bacterial outer membranes. Mol Microbiol. 1992 Feb;6(4):435–442. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.1992.tb01487.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Palva E. T. Major outer membrane protein in Salmonella typhimurium induced by maltose. J Bacteriol. 1978 Oct;136(1):286–294. doi: 10.1128/jb.136.1.286-294.1978. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Riess F. G., Lichtinger T., Cseh R., Yassin A. F., Schaal K. P., Benz R. The cell wall porin of Nocardia farcinica: biochemical identification of the channel-forming protein and biophysical characterization of the channel properties. Mol Microbiol. 1998 Jul;29(1):139–150. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2958.1998.00914.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Schirmer T., Keller T. A., Wang Y. F., Rosenbusch J. P. Structural basis for sugar translocation through maltoporin channels at 3.1 A resolution. Science. 1995 Jan 27;267(5197):512–514. doi: 10.1126/science.7824948. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Schmid K., Ebner R., Jahreis K., Lengeler J. W., Titgemeyer F. A sugar-specific porin, ScrY, is involved in sucrose uptake in enteric bacteria. Mol Microbiol. 1991 Apr;5(4):941–950. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.1991.tb00769.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Schülein K., Andersen C., Benz R. The deletion of 70 amino acids near the N-terminal end of the sucrose-specific porin ScrY causes its functional similarity to LamB in vivo and in vitro. Mol Microbiol. 1995 Aug;17(4):757–767. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.1995.mmi_17040757.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Schülein K., Schmid K., Benzl R. The sugar-specific outer membrane channel ScrY contains functional characteristics of general diffusion pores and substrate-specific porins. Mol Microbiol. 1991 Sep;5(9):2233–2241. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.1991.tb02153.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Szmelcman S., Hofnung M. Maltose transport in Escherichia coli K-12: involvement of the bacteriophage lambda receptor. J Bacteriol. 1975 Oct;124(1):112–118. doi: 10.1128/jb.124.1.112-118.1975. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Trias J., Benz R. Characterization of the channel formed by the mycobacterial porin in lipid bilayer membranes. Demonstration of voltage gating and of negative point charges at the channel mouth. J Biol Chem. 1993 Mar 25;268(9):6234–6240. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Walker B., Kasianowicz J., Krishnasastry M., Bayley H. A pore-forming protein with a metal-actuated switch. Protein Eng. 1994 May;7(5):655–662. doi: 10.1093/protein/7.5.655. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. von Meyenburg K., Nikaido H. Outer membrane of gram-negative bacteria. XVII. Secificity of transport process catalyzed by the lambda-receptor protein in Escherichia coli. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1977 Oct 10;78(3):1100–1107. doi: 10.1016/0006-291x(77)90534-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Biophysical Journal are provided here courtesy of The Biophysical Society

RESOURCES