Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Biophysical Journal logoLink to Biophysical Journal
. 2002 May;82(5):2536–2547. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(02)75597-5

Structural features of cross-bridges in isometrically contracting skeletal muscle.

Theresia Kraft 1, Thomas Mattei 1, Ante Radocaj 1, Birgit Piep 1, Christoph Nocula 1, Markus Furch 1, Bernhard Brenner 1
PMCID: PMC1302044  PMID: 11964242

Abstract

Two-dimensional x-ray diffraction was used to investigate structural features of cross-bridges that generate force in isometrically contracting skeletal muscle. Diffraction patterns were recorded from arrays of single, chemically skinned rabbit psoas muscle fibers during isometric force generation, under relaxation, and in rigor. In isometric contraction, a rather prominent intensification of the actin layer lines at 5.9 and 5.1 nm and of the first actin layer line at 37 nm was found compared with those under relaxing conditions. Surprisingly, during isometric contraction, the intensity profile of the 5.9-nm actin layer line was shifted toward the meridian, but the resulting intensity profile was different from that observed in rigor. We particularly addressed the question whether the differences seen between rigor and active contraction might be due to a rigor-like configuration of both myosin heads in the absence of nucleotide (rigor), whereas during active contraction only one head of each myosin molecule is in a rigor-like configuration and the second head is weakly bound. To investigate this question, we created different mixtures of weak binding myosin heads and rigor-like actomyosin complexes by titrating MgATPgammaS at saturating [Ca2+] into arrays of single muscle fibers. The resulting diffraction patterns were different in several respects from patterns recorded under isometric contraction, particularly in the intensity distribution along the 5.9-nm actin layer line. This result indicates that cross-bridges present during isometric force generation are not simply a mixture of weakly bound and single-headed rigor-like complexes but are rather distinctly different from the rigor-like cross-bridge. Experiments with myosin-S1 and truncated S1 (motor domain) support the idea that for a force generating cross-bridge, disorder due to elastic distortion might involve a larger part of the myosin head than for a nucleotide free, rigor cross-bridge.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (318.8 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Bershitsky S. Y., Tsaturyan A. K., Bershitskaya O. N., Mashanov G. I., Brown P., Burns R., Ferenczi M. A. Muscle force is generated by myosin heads stereospecifically attached to actin. Nature. 1997 Jul 10;388(6638):186–190. doi: 10.1038/40651. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Biophysical Society 41st annual meeting. New Orleans, Louisiana, 2-6 March 1997. Abstracts. Biophys J. 1997 Feb;72(2 Pt 2):A1–476. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Brenner B., Chalovich J. M., Yu L. C. Distinct molecular processes associated with isometric force generation and rapid tension recovery after quick release. Biophys J. 1995 Apr;68(4 Suppl):106S–111S. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Brenner B. Rapid dissociation and reassociation of actomyosin cross-bridges during force generation: a newly observed facet of cross-bridge action in muscle. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1991 Dec 1;88(23):10490–10494. doi: 10.1073/pnas.88.23.10490. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Brenner B. Technique for stabilizing the striation pattern in maximally calcium-activated skinned rabbit psoas fibers. Biophys J. 1983 Jan;41(1):99–102. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(83)84411-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Brenner B., Xu S., Chalovich J. M., Yu L. C. Radial equilibrium lengths of actomyosin cross-bridges in muscle. Biophys J. 1996 Nov;71(5):2751–2758. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(96)79468-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Brenner B., Yu L. C., Podolsky R. J. X-ray diffraction evidence for cross-bridge formation in relaxed muscle fibers at various ionic strengths. Biophys J. 1984 Sep;46(3):299–306. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(84)84026-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Brenner B., Yu L. C. Structural changes in the actomyosin cross-bridges associated with force generation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1993 Jun 1;90(11):5252–5256. doi: 10.1073/pnas.90.11.5252. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Cooke R., Crowder M. S., Thomas D. D. Orientation of spin labels attached to cross-bridges in contracting muscle fibres. Nature. 1982 Dec 23;300(5894):776–778. doi: 10.1038/300776a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Cooke R., Crowder M. S., Wendt C. H., Barnett V. A., Thomas D. D. Muscle cross-bridges: do they rotate? Adv Exp Med Biol. 1984;170:413–427. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4684-4703-3_37. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Cooke R., Franks K. All myosin heads form bonds with actin in rigor rabbit skeletal muscle. Biochemistry. 1980 May 13;19(10):2265–2269. doi: 10.1021/bi00551a042. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Fajer P. G., Fajer E. A., Thomas D. D. Myosin heads have a broad orientational distribution during isometric muscle contraction: time-resolved EPR studies using caged ATP. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1990 Jul;87(14):5538–5542. doi: 10.1073/pnas.87.14.5538. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Furch M., Geeves M. A., Manstein D. J. Modulation of actin affinity and actomyosin adenosine triphosphatase by charge changes in the myosin motor domain. Biochemistry. 1998 May 5;37(18):6317–6326. doi: 10.1021/bi972851y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Geeves M. A., Holmes K. C. Structural mechanism of muscle contraction. Annu Rev Biochem. 1999;68:687–728. doi: 10.1146/annurev.biochem.68.1.687. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Haselgrove J. C. X-ray evidence for conformational changes in the myosin filaments of vertebrate striated muscle. J Mol Biol. 1975 Feb 15;92(1):113–143. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(75)90094-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Hill T. L. Theoretical formalism for the sliding filament model of contraction of striated muscle. Part I. Prog Biophys Mol Biol. 1974;28:267–340. doi: 10.1016/0079-6107(74)90020-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Hirose K., Lenart T. D., Murray J. M., Franzini-Armstrong C., Goldman Y. E. Flash and smash: rapid freezing of muscle fibers activated by photolysis of caged ATP. Biophys J. 1993 Jul;65(1):397–408. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(93)81061-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Holmes K. C. The swinging lever-arm hypothesis of muscle contraction. Curr Biol. 1997 Feb 1;7(2):R112–R118. doi: 10.1016/s0960-9822(06)00051-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Huxley H. E., Brown W. The low-angle x-ray diagram of vertebrate striated muscle and its behaviour during contraction and rigor. J Mol Biol. 1967 Dec 14;30(2):383–434. doi: 10.1016/s0022-2836(67)80046-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Huxley H. E., Faruqi A. R., Kress M., Bordas J., Koch M. H. Time-resolved X-ray diffraction studies of the myosin layer-line reflections during muscle contraction. J Mol Biol. 1982 Jul 15;158(4):637–684. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(82)90253-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Huxley H. E., Kress M. Crossbridge behaviour during muscle contraction. J Muscle Res Cell Motil. 1985 Apr;6(2):153–161. doi: 10.1007/BF00713057. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Irving M., St Claire Allen T., Sabido-David C., Craik J. S., Brandmeier B., Kendrick-Jones J., Corrie J. E., Trentham D. R., Goldman Y. E. Tilting of the light-chain region of myosin during step length changes and active force generation in skeletal muscle. Nature. 1995 Jun 22;375(6533):688–691. doi: 10.1038/375688a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Kraft T., Brenner B. Force enhancement without changes in cross-bridge turnover kinetics: the effect of EMD 57033. Biophys J. 1997 Jan;72(1):272–281. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(97)78666-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Kraft T., Mattei T., Brenner B. Structural features of force-generating cross-bridges. A 2D-X-ray diffraction study. Adv Exp Med Biol. 1998;453:289–296. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4684-6039-1_34. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Kraft T., Xu S., Brenner B., Yu L. C. The effect of thin filament activation on the attachment of weak binding cross-bridges: A two-dimensional x-ray diffraction study on single muscle fibers. Biophys J. 1999 Mar;76(3):1494–1513. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(99)77309-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Kraft T., Yu L. C., Kuhn H. J., Brenner B. Effect of Ca2+ on weak cross-bridge interaction with actin in the presence of adenosine 5'-[gamma-thio]triphosphate). Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1992 Dec 1;89(23):11362–11366. doi: 10.1073/pnas.89.23.11362. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Kress M., Huxley H. E., Faruqi A. R., Hendrix J. Structural changes during activation of frog muscle studied by time-resolved X-ray diffraction. J Mol Biol. 1986 Apr 5;188(3):325–342. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(86)90158-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Lorenz M., Popp D., Holmes K. C. Refinement of the F-actin model against X-ray fiber diffraction data by the use of a directed mutation algorithm. J Mol Biol. 1993 Dec 5;234(3):826–836. doi: 10.1006/jmbi.1993.1628. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Lovell S. J., Harrington W. F. Measurement of the fraction of myosin heads bound to actin in rabbit skeletal myofibrils in rigor. J Mol Biol. 1981 Jul 15;149(4):659–674. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(81)90352-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Lowy J., Poulsen F. R. X-ray study of myosin heads in contracting frog skeletal muscle. J Mol Biol. 1987 Apr 20;194(4):595–600. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(87)90236-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Maéda Y., Popp D., McLaughlin S. M. Cause of changes in the thin filament-associated reflexions on activation of frog muscle--myosin binding or conformational change of actin. Adv Exp Med Biol. 1988;226:381–390. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Parry D. A., Squire J. M. Structural role of tropomyosin in muscle regulation: analysis of the x-ray diffraction patterns from relaxed and contracting muscles. J Mol Biol. 1973 Mar 25;75(1):33–55. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(73)90527-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Poulsen F. R., Lowy J. Small-angle X-ray scattering from myosin heads in relaxed and rigor frog skeletal muscles. Nature. 1983 May 12;303(5913):146–152. doi: 10.1038/303146a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Rapp G., Güth K., Maeda Y., Poole K. J., Goody R. S. Time-resolved X-ray diffraction studies on stretch-activated insect flight muscle. J Muscle Res Cell Motil. 1991 Apr;12(2):208–215. doi: 10.1007/BF01774040. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Rayment I., Rypniewski W. R., Schmidt-Bäse K., Smith R., Tomchick D. R., Benning M. M., Winkelmann D. A., Wesenberg G., Holden H. M. Three-dimensional structure of myosin subfragment-1: a molecular motor. Science. 1993 Jul 2;261(5117):50–58. doi: 10.1126/science.8316857. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Roopnarine O., Thomas D. D. Orientational dynamics of indane dione spin-labeled myosin heads in relaxed and contracting skeletal muscle fibers. Biophys J. 1995 Apr;68(4):1461–1471. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(95)80319-X. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Tsaturyan A. K., Bershitsky S. Y., Burns R., Ferenczi M. A. Structural changes in the actin-myosin cross-bridges associated with force generation induced by temperature jump in permeabilized frog muscle fibers. Biophys J. 1999 Jul;77(1):354–372. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(99)76895-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Wakabayashi K., Tanaka H., Amemiya Y., Fujishima A., Kobayashi T., Hamanaka T., Sugi H., Mitsui T. Time-resolved x-ray diffraction studies on the intensity changes of the 5.9 and 5.1 nm actin layer lines from frog skeletal muscle during an isometric tetanus using synchrotron radiation. Biophys J. 1985 Jun;47(6):847–850. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(85)83989-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Wakabayashi K., Tanaka H., Saito H., Moriwaki N., Ueno Y., Amemiya Y. Dynamic X-ray diffraction of skeletal muscle contraction: structural change of actin filaments. Adv Biophys. 1991;27:3–13. doi: 10.1016/0065-227x(91)90004-w. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Williams D. L., Jr, Greene L. E., Eisenberg E. Comparison of effects of smooth and skeletal muscle tropomyosins on interactions of actin and myosin subfragment 1. Biochemistry. 1984 Aug 28;23(18):4150–4155. doi: 10.1021/bi00313a022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Xu S. G., Kress M., Huxley H. E. X-ray diffraction studies of the structural state of crossbridges in skinned frog sartorius muscle at low ionic strength. J Muscle Res Cell Motil. 1987 Feb;8(1):39–54. doi: 10.1007/BF01767263. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Xu S., Malinchik S., Gilroy D., Kraft T., Brenner B., Yu L. C. X-ray diffraction studies of cross-bridges weakly bound to actin in relaxed skinned fibers of rabbit psoas muscle. Biophys J. 1997 Nov;73(5):2292–2303. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(97)78261-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Yagi N., Matsubara I. Changes in the 5.9 nm actin layer-line on activation of frog skeletal muscles. Adv Exp Med Biol. 1988;226:369–380. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Yu L. C., Brenner B. Structures of actomyosin crossbridges in relaxed and rigor muscle fibers. Biophys J. 1989 Mar;55(3):441–453. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(89)82838-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. al-Khayat H. A., Yagi N., Squire J. M. Structural changes in actin-tropomyosin during muscle regulation: computer modelling of low-angle X-ray diffraction data. J Mol Biol. 1995 Oct 6;252(5):611–632. doi: 10.1006/jmbi.1995.0524. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Biophysical Journal are provided here courtesy of The Biophysical Society

RESOURCES