Skip to main content
PMC home page
Biophysical Journal logoLink to Biophysical Journal
. 2002 Jun;82(6):2847–2859. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(02)75627-0

Computer simulation of the 30-nanometer chromatin fiber.

Gero Wedemann 1, Jörg Langowski 1
PMCID: PMC1302074  PMID: 12023209

Abstract

A new Monte Carlo model for the structure of chromatin is presented here. Based on our previous work on superhelical DNA and polynucleosomes, it reintegrates aspects of the "solenoid" and the "zig-zag" models. The DNA is modeled as a flexible elastic polymer chain, consisting of segments connected by elastic bending, torsional, and stretching springs. The electrostatic interaction between the DNA segments is described by the Debye-Hückel approximation. Nucleosome core particles are represented by oblate ellipsoids; their interaction potential has been parameterized by a comparison with data from liquid crystals of nucleosome solutions. DNA and chromatosomes are linked either at the surface of the chromatosome or through a rigid nucleosome stem. Equilibrium ensembles of 100-nucleosome chains at physiological ionic strength were generated by a Metropolis-Monte Carlo algorithm. For a DNA linked at the nucleosome stem and a nucleosome repeat of 200 bp, the simulated fiber diameter of 32 nm and the mass density of 6.1 nucleosomes per 11 nm fiber length are in excellent agreement with experimental values from the literature. The experimental value of the inclination of DNA and nucleosomes to the fiber axis could also be reproduced. Whereas the linker DNA connects chromatosomes on opposite sides of the fiber, the overall packing of the nucleosomes leads to a helical aspect of the structure. The persistence length of the simulated fibers is 265 nm. For more random fibers where the tilt angles between two nucleosomes are chosen according to a Gaussian distribution along the fiber, the persistence length decreases to 30 nm with increasing width of the distribution, whereas the other observable parameters such as the mass density remain unchanged. Polynucleosomes with repeat lengths of 212 bp also form fibers with the expected experimental properties. Systems with larger repeat length form fibers, but the mass density is significantly lower than the measured value. The theoretical characteristics of a fiber with a repeat length of 192 bp where DNA and nucleosomes are connected at the core particle are in agreement with the experimental values. Systems without a stem and a repeat length of 217 bp do not form fibers.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (422.3 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Beard D. A., Schlick T. Computational modeling predicts the structure and dynamics of chromatin fiber. Structure. 2001 Feb 7;9(2):105–114. doi: 10.1016/s0969-2126(01)00572-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Beard D. A., Schlick T. Modeling salt-mediated electrostatics of macromolecules: the discrete surface charge optimization algorithm and its application to the nucleosome. Biopolymers. 2001 Jan;58(1):106–115. doi: 10.1002/1097-0282(200101)58:1<106::AID-BIP100>3.0.CO;2-#. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bednar J., Horowitz R. A., Grigoryev S. A., Carruthers L. M., Hansen J. C., Koster A. J., Woodcock C. L. Nucleosomes, linker DNA, and linker histone form a unique structural motif that directs the higher-order folding and compaction of chromatin. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1998 Nov 24;95(24):14173–14178. doi: 10.1073/pnas.95.24.14173. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Bordas J., Perez-Grau L., Koch M. H., Vega M. C., Nave C. The superstructure of chromatin and its condensation mechanism. I. Synchrotron radiation X-ray scattering results. Eur Biophys J. 1986;13(3):157–173. doi: 10.1007/BF00542560. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Campbell A. M., Cotter R. I., Pardon J. F. Light scattering measurements supporting helical structures for chromatin in solution. Nucleic Acids Res. 1978 May;5(5):1571–1580. doi: 10.1093/nar/5.5.1571. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Cui Y., Bustamante C. Pulling a single chromatin fiber reveals the forces that maintain its higher-order structure. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2000 Jan 4;97(1):127–132. doi: 10.1073/pnas.97.1.127. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Dimitrov S. I., Makarov V. L., Pashev I. G. The chromatin fiber: structure and conformational transitions as revealed by optical anisotropy studies. J Biomol Struct Dyn. 1990 Aug;8(1):23–35. doi: 10.1080/07391102.1990.10507787. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Ehrlich L., Münkel C., Chirico G., Langowski J. A Brownian dynamics model for the chromatin fiber. Comput Appl Biosci. 1997 Jun;13(3):271–279. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/13.3.271. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Finch J. T., Klug A. Solenoidal model for superstructure in chromatin. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1976 Jun;73(6):1897–1901. doi: 10.1073/pnas.73.6.1897. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Gerchman S. E., Ramakrishnan V. Chromatin higher-order structure studied by neutron scattering and scanning transmission electron microscopy. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1987 Nov;84(22):7802–7806. doi: 10.1073/pnas.84.22.7802. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Houchmandzadeh B., Marko J. F., Chatenay D., Libchaber A. Elasticity and structure of eukaryote chromosomes studied by micromanipulation and micropipette aspiration. J Cell Biol. 1997 Oct 6;139(1):1–12. doi: 10.1083/jcb.139.1.1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Katritch V., Bustamante C., Olson W. K. Pulling chromatin fibers: computer simulations of direct physical micromanipulations. J Mol Biol. 2000 Jan 7;295(1):29–40. doi: 10.1006/jmbi.1999.3021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Kornberg R. D. Chromatin structure: a repeating unit of histones and DNA. Science. 1974 May 24;184(4139):868–871. doi: 10.1126/science.184.4139.868. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Krajewski W. A., Ausió J. Modulation of the higher-order folding of chromatin by deletion of histone H3 and H4 terminal domains. Biochem J. 1996 Jun 1;316(Pt 2):395–400. doi: 10.1042/bj3160395. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Kubista M., Hagmar P., Nielsen P. E., Nordén B. Reinterpretation of linear dichroism of chromatin supports a perpendicular linker orientation in the folded state. J Biomol Struct Dyn. 1990 Aug;8(1):37–54. doi: 10.1080/07391102.1990.10507788. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Leforestier A., Livolant F. Liquid crystalline ordering of nucleosome core particles under macromolecular crowding conditions: evidence for a discotic columnar hexagonal phase. Biophys J. 1997 Oct;73(4):1771–1776. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(97)78207-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Luger K., Mäder A. W., Richmond R. K., Sargent D. F., Richmond T. J. Crystal structure of the nucleosome core particle at 2.8 A resolution. Nature. 1997 Sep 18;389(6648):251–260. doi: 10.1038/38444. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Morse R. H., Cantor C. R. Nucleosome core particles suppress the thermal untwisting of core DNA and adjacent linker DNA. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1985 Jul;82(14):4653–4657. doi: 10.1073/pnas.82.14.4653. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Olins A. L., Olins D. E. Spheroid chromatin units (v bodies). Science. 1974 Jan 25;183(4122):330–332. doi: 10.1126/science.183.4122.330. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Rydberg B., Holley W. R., Mian I. S., Chatterjee A. Chromatin conformation in living cells: support for a zig-zag model of the 30 nm chromatin fiber. J Mol Biol. 1998 Nov 20;284(1):71–84. doi: 10.1006/jmbi.1998.2150. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Schellman J. A. Electrical double layer, zeta potential, and electrophoretic charge of double-stranded DNA. Biopolymers. 1977 Jul;16(7):1415–1434. doi: 10.1002/bip.1977.360160704. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Smith S. B., Cui Y., Bustamante C. Overstretching B-DNA: the elastic response of individual double-stranded and single-stranded DNA molecules. Science. 1996 Feb 9;271(5250):795–799. doi: 10.1126/science.271.5250.795. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Stigter D. Interactions of highly charged colloidal cylinders with applications to double-stranded. Biopolymers. 1977 Jul;16(7):1435–1448. doi: 10.1002/bip.1977.360160705. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Suau P., Bradbury E. M., Baldwin J. P. Higher-order structures of chromatin in solution. Eur J Biochem. 1979 Jul;97(2):593–602. doi: 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1979.tb13148.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Woodcock C. L., Grigoryev S. A., Horowitz R. A., Whitaker N. A chromatin folding model that incorporates linker variability generates fibers resembling the native structures. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1993 Oct 1;90(19):9021–9025. doi: 10.1073/pnas.90.19.9021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Woodcock C. L., Horowitz R. A. Chromatin organization re-viewed. Trends Cell Biol. 1995 Jul;5(7):272–277. doi: 10.1016/s0962-8924(00)89038-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Yokota H., van den Engh G., Hearst J. E., Sachs R. K., Trask B. J. Evidence for the organization of chromatin in megabase pair-sized loops arranged along a random walk path in the human G0/G1 interphase nucleus. J Cell Biol. 1995 Sep;130(6):1239–1249. doi: 10.1083/jcb.130.6.1239. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. van Holde K., Zlatanova J. Chromatin higher order structure: chasing a mirage? J Biol Chem. 1995 Apr 14;270(15):8373–8376. doi: 10.1074/jbc.270.15.8373. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. van den Engh G., Sachs R., Trask B. J. Estimating genomic distance from DNA sequence location in cell nuclei by a random walk model. Science. 1992 Sep 4;257(5075):1410–1412. doi: 10.1126/science.1388286. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Biophysical Journal are provided here courtesy of The Biophysical Society

RESOURCES