Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Biophysical Journal logoLink to Biophysical Journal
. 2002 Jul;83(1):42–58. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(02)75148-5

A simple, mechanistic model for directional instability during mitotic chromosome movements.

Ajit P Joglekar 1, Alan J Hunt 1
PMCID: PMC1302126  PMID: 12080099

Abstract

During mitosis, chromosomes become attached to microtubules that emanate from the two spindle poles. Thereafter, a chromosome moves along these microtubule "tracks" as it executes a series of movements that bring it to the spindle equator. After the onset of anaphase, the sister chromatids separate and move to opposite spindle poles. These movements are often characterized by "directional instability" (a series of runs with approximately constant speed, punctuated by sudden reversals in the direction of movement). To understand mitosis, it is critical to describe the physical mechanisms that underlie the coordination of the forces that drive directional instability. We propose a simple mechanistic model that describes the origin of the forces that move chromosomes and the coordination of these forces to produce directional instability. The model demonstrates that forces, speeds, and direction of motion associated with prometaphase through anaphase chromosome movements can be predicted from the molecular kinetics of interactions between dynamic microtubules and arrays of microtubule binding sites that are linked to the chromosome by compliant elements.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (451.5 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Antonio C., Ferby I., Wilhelm H., Jones M., Karsenti E., Nebreda A. R., Vernos I. Xkid, a chromokinesin required for chromosome alignment on the metaphase plate. Cell. 2000 Aug 18;102(4):425–435. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)00048-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Ault J. G., DeMarco A. J., Salmon E. D., Rieder C. L. Studies on the ejection properties of asters: astral microtubule turnover influences the oscillatory behavior and positioning of mono-oriented chromosomes. J Cell Sci. 1991 Aug;99(Pt 4):701–710. doi: 10.1242/jcs.99.4.701. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Caplow M., Ruhlen R. L., Shanks J. The free energy for hydrolysis of a microtubule-bound nucleotide triphosphate is near zero: all of the free energy for hydrolysis is stored in the microtubule lattice. J Cell Biol. 1994 Nov;127(3):779–788. doi: 10.1083/jcb.127.3.779. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Cassimeris L., Rieder C. L., Salmon E. D. Microtubule assembly and kinetochore directional instability in vertebrate monopolar spindles: implications for the mechanism of chromosome congression. J Cell Sci. 1994 Jan;107(Pt 1):285–297. doi: 10.1242/jcs.107.1.285. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Cassimeris L., Salmon E. D. Kinetochore microtubules shorten by loss of subunits at the kinetochores of prometaphase chromosomes. J Cell Sci. 1991 Feb;98(Pt 2):151–158. doi: 10.1242/jcs.98.2.151. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Cimini D., Howell B., Maddox P., Khodjakov A., Degrassi F., Salmon E. D. Merotelic kinetochore orientation is a major mechanism of aneuploidy in mitotic mammalian tissue cells. J Cell Biol. 2001 Apr 30;153(3):517–527. doi: 10.1083/jcb.153.3.517. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Desai A., Mitchison T. J. A new role for motor proteins as couplers to depolymerizing microtubules. J Cell Biol. 1995 Jan;128(1-2):1–4. doi: 10.1083/jcb.128.1.1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Desai A., Mitchison T. J. Microtubule polymerization dynamics. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol. 1997;13:83–117. doi: 10.1146/annurev.cellbio.13.1.83. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Dogterom M., Yurke B. Measurement of the force-velocity relation for growing microtubules. Science. 1997 Oct 31;278(5339):856–860. doi: 10.1126/science.278.5339.856. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Echeverri C. J., Paschal B. M., Vaughan K. T., Vallee R. B. Molecular characterization of the 50-kD subunit of dynactin reveals function for the complex in chromosome alignment and spindle organization during mitosis. J Cell Biol. 1996 Feb;132(4):617–633. doi: 10.1083/jcb.132.4.617. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Funabiki H., Murray A. W. The Xenopus chromokinesin Xkid is essential for metaphase chromosome alignment and must be degraded to allow anaphase chromosome movement. Cell. 2000 Aug 18;102(4):411–424. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)00047-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Gorbsky G. J., Sammak P. J., Borisy G. G. Chromosomes move poleward in anaphase along stationary microtubules that coordinately disassemble from their kinetochore ends. J Cell Biol. 1987 Jan;104(1):9–18. doi: 10.1083/jcb.104.1.9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Hayden J. H., Bowser S. S., Rieder C. L. Kinetochores capture astral microtubules during chromosome attachment to the mitotic spindle: direct visualization in live newt lung cells. J Cell Biol. 1990 Sep;111(3):1039–1045. doi: 10.1083/jcb.111.3.1039. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Hays T. S., Salmon E. D. Poleward force at the kinetochore in metaphase depends on the number of kinetochore microtubules. J Cell Biol. 1990 Feb;110(2):391–404. doi: 10.1083/jcb.110.2.391. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. He X., Asthana S., Sorger P. K. Transient sister chromatid separation and elastic deformation of chromosomes during mitosis in budding yeast. Cell. 2000 Jun 23;101(7):763–775. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)80888-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Hill T. L. Theoretical problems related to the attachment of microtubules to kinetochores. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1985 Jul;82(13):4404–4408. doi: 10.1073/pnas.82.13.4404. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Hunt A. J., Gittes F., Howard J. The force exerted by a single kinesin molecule against a viscous load. Biophys J. 1994 Aug;67(2):766–781. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(94)80537-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Hunt A. J., McIntosh J. R. The dynamic behavior of individual microtubules associated with chromosomes in vitro. Mol Biol Cell. 1998 Oct;9(10):2857–2871. doi: 10.1091/mbc.9.10.2857. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Hunter A. W., Wordeman L. How motor proteins influence microtubule polymerization dynamics. J Cell Sci. 2000 Dec;113(Pt 24):4379–4389. doi: 10.1242/jcs.113.24.4379. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Khodjakov A., Cole R. W., McEwen B. F., Buttle K. F., Rieder C. L. Chromosome fragments possessing only one kinetochore can congress to the spindle equator. J Cell Biol. 1997 Jan 27;136(2):229–240. doi: 10.1083/jcb.136.2.229. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Khodjakov A., Gabashvili I. S., Rieder C. L. "Dumb" versus "smart" kinetochore models for chromosome congression during mitosis in vertebrate somatic cells. Cell Motil Cytoskeleton. 1999;43(3):179–185. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0169(1999)43:3<179::AID-CM1>3.0.CO;2-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Khodjakov A., Rieder C. L. Kinetochores moving away from their associated pole do not exert a significant pushing force on the chromosome. J Cell Biol. 1996 Oct;135(2):315–327. doi: 10.1083/jcb.135.2.315. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. King J. M., Hays T. S., Nicklas R. B. Dynein is a transient kinetochore component whose binding is regulated by microtubule attachment, not tension. J Cell Biol. 2000 Nov 13;151(4):739–748. doi: 10.1083/jcb.151.4.739. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Kolomeisky A. B., Fisher M. E. Force-velocity relation for growing microtubules. Biophys J. 2001 Jan;80(1):149–154. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(01)76002-X. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Levesque A. A., Compton D. A. The chromokinesin Kid is necessary for chromosome arm orientation and oscillation, but not congression, on mitotic spindles. J Cell Biol. 2001 Sep 17;154(6):1135–1146. doi: 10.1083/jcb.200106093. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Lombillo V. A., Stewart R. J., McIntosh J. R. Minus-end-directed motion of kinesin-coated microspheres driven by microtubule depolymerization. Nature. 1995 Jan 12;373(6510):161–164. doi: 10.1038/373161a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Maney T., Ginkel L. M., Hunter A. W., Wordeman L. The kinetochore of higher eucaryotes: a molecular view. Int Rev Cytol. 2000;194:67–131. doi: 10.1016/s0074-7696(08)62395-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Mastronarde D. N., McDonald K. L., Ding R., McIntosh J. R. Interpolar spindle microtubules in PTK cells. J Cell Biol. 1993 Dec;123(6 Pt 1):1475–1489. doi: 10.1083/jcb.123.6.1475. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. McDonald K. L., O'Toole E. T., Mastronarde D. N., McIntosh J. R. Kinetochore microtubules in PTK cells. J Cell Biol. 1992 Jul;118(2):369–383. doi: 10.1083/jcb.118.2.369. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. McEwen B. F., Arena J. T., Frank J., Rieder C. L. Structure of the colcemid-treated PtK1 kinetochore outer plate as determined by high voltage electron microscopic tomography. J Cell Biol. 1993 Jan;120(2):301–312. doi: 10.1083/jcb.120.2.301. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. McEwen B. F., Chan G. K., Zubrowski B., Savoian M. S., Sauer M. T., Yen T. J. CENP-E is essential for reliable bioriented spindle attachment, but chromosome alignment can be achieved via redundant mechanisms in mammalian cells. Mol Biol Cell. 2001 Sep;12(9):2776–2789. doi: 10.1091/mbc.12.9.2776. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. McEwen B. F., Heagle A. B., Cassels G. O., Buttle K. F., Rieder C. L. Kinetochore fiber maturation in PtK1 cells and its implications for the mechanisms of chromosome congression and anaphase onset. J Cell Biol. 1997 Jun 30;137(7):1567–1580. doi: 10.1083/jcb.137.7.1567. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Meyhöfer E., Howard J. The force generated by a single kinesin molecule against an elastic load. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1995 Jan 17;92(2):574–578. doi: 10.1073/pnas.92.2.574. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Mickey B., Howard J. Rigidity of microtubules is increased by stabilizing agents. J Cell Biol. 1995 Aug;130(4):909–917. doi: 10.1083/jcb.130.4.909. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Mitchison T. J., Salmon E. D. Poleward kinetochore fiber movement occurs during both metaphase and anaphase-A in newt lung cell mitosis. J Cell Biol. 1992 Nov;119(3):569–582. doi: 10.1083/jcb.119.3.569. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Mitchison T., Evans L., Schulze E., Kirschner M. Sites of microtubule assembly and disassembly in the mitotic spindle. Cell. 1986 May 23;45(4):515–527. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(86)90283-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Mitchison T., Kirschner M. Dynamic instability of microtubule growth. Nature. 1984 Nov 15;312(5991):237–242. doi: 10.1038/312237a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Murray A. W., Mitchison T. J. Mitosis. Kinetochores pass the IQ test. Curr Biol. 1994 Jan 1;4(1):38–41. doi: 10.1016/s0960-9822(00)00007-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. NICKLAS R. B. CHROMOSOME VELOCITY DURING MITOSIS AS A FUNCTION OF CHROMOSOME SIZE AND POSITION. J Cell Biol. 1965 Apr;25:SUPPL–SUPPL:135. doi: 10.1083/jcb.25.1.119. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Nicklas R. B. Measurements of the force produced by the mitotic spindle in anaphase. J Cell Biol. 1983 Aug;97(2):542–548. doi: 10.1083/jcb.97.2.542. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Nicklas R. B. The forces that move chromosomes in mitosis. Annu Rev Biophys Biophys Chem. 1988;17:431–449. doi: 10.1146/annurev.bb.17.060188.002243. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Nicklas R. B., Ward S. C. Elements of error correction in mitosis: microtubule capture, release, and tension. J Cell Biol. 1994 Sep;126(5):1241–1253. doi: 10.1083/jcb.126.5.1241. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Oiwa K., Takahashi K. The force-velocity relationship for microtubule sliding in demembranated sperm flagella of the sea urchin. Cell Struct Funct. 1988 Jun;13(3):193–205. doi: 10.1247/csf.13.193. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Pfarr C. M., Coue M., Grissom P. M., Hays T. S., Porter M. E., McIntosh J. R. Cytoplasmic dynein is localized to kinetochores during mitosis. Nature. 1990 May 17;345(6272):263–265. doi: 10.1038/345263a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Rieder C. L., Alexander S. P. Kinetochores are transported poleward along a single astral microtubule during chromosome attachment to the spindle in newt lung cells. J Cell Biol. 1990 Jan;110(1):81–95. doi: 10.1083/jcb.110.1.81. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Rieder C. L., Davison E. A., Jensen L. C., Cassimeris L., Salmon E. D. Oscillatory movements of monooriented chromosomes and their position relative to the spindle pole result from the ejection properties of the aster and half-spindle. J Cell Biol. 1986 Aug;103(2):581–591. doi: 10.1083/jcb.103.2.581. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Rieder C. L., Salmon E. D. Motile kinetochores and polar ejection forces dictate chromosome position on the vertebrate mitotic spindle. J Cell Biol. 1994 Feb;124(3):223–233. doi: 10.1083/jcb.124.3.223. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Rieder C. L., Salmon E. D. The vertebrate cell kinetochore and its roles during mitosis. Trends Cell Biol. 1998 Aug;8(8):310–318. doi: 10.1016/s0962-8924(98)01299-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Rieder C. L. The formation, structure, and composition of the mammalian kinetochore and kinetochore fiber. Int Rev Cytol. 1982;79:1–58. doi: 10.1016/s0074-7696(08)61672-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Rusan N. M., Fagerstrom C. J., Yvon A. M., Wadsworth P. Cell cycle-dependent changes in microtubule dynamics in living cells expressing green fluorescent protein-alpha tubulin. Mol Biol Cell. 2001 Apr;12(4):971–980. doi: 10.1091/mbc.12.4.971. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Savoian M. S., Goldberg M. L., Rieder C. L. The rate of poleward chromosome motion is attenuated in Drosophila zw10 and rod mutants. Nat Cell Biol. 2000 Dec;2(12):948–952. doi: 10.1038/35046605. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Schaar B. T., Chan G. K., Maddox P., Salmon E. D., Yen T. J. CENP-E function at kinetochores is essential for chromosome alignment. J Cell Biol. 1997 Dec 15;139(6):1373–1382. doi: 10.1083/jcb.139.6.1373. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Schnitzer M. J., Visscher K., Block S. M. Force production by single kinesin motors. Nat Cell Biol. 2000 Oct;2(10):718–723. doi: 10.1038/35036345. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Sharp D. J., Rogers G. C., Scholey J. M. Cytoplasmic dynein is required for poleward chromosome movement during mitosis in Drosophila embryos. Nat Cell Biol. 2000 Dec;2(12):922–930. doi: 10.1038/35046574. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Skibbens R. V., Rieder C. L., Salmon E. D. Kinetochore motility after severing between sister centromeres using laser microsurgery: evidence that kinetochore directional instability and position is regulated by tension. J Cell Sci. 1995 Jul;108(Pt 7):2537–2548. doi: 10.1242/jcs.108.7.2537. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. Skibbens R. V., Skeen V. P., Salmon E. D. Directional instability of kinetochore motility during chromosome congression and segregation in mitotic newt lung cells: a push-pull mechanism. J Cell Biol. 1993 Aug;122(4):859–875. doi: 10.1083/jcb.122.4.859. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. Svoboda K., Block S. M. Force and velocity measured for single kinesin molecules. Cell. 1994 Jun 3;77(5):773–784. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(94)90060-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. Vallee R. Mitosis: dynein and the kinetochore. Nature. 1990 May 17;345(6272):206–207. doi: 10.1038/345206a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  59. Walczak C. E., Mitchison T. J., Desai A. XKCM1: a Xenopus kinesin-related protein that regulates microtubule dynamics during mitotic spindle assembly. Cell. 1996 Jan 12;84(1):37–47. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)80991-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  60. Walker R. A., O'Brien E. T., Pryer N. K., Soboeiro M. F., Voter W. A., Erickson H. P., Salmon E. D. Dynamic instability of individual microtubules analyzed by video light microscopy: rate constants and transition frequencies. J Cell Biol. 1988 Oct;107(4):1437–1448. doi: 10.1083/jcb.107.4.1437. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  61. Waters J. C., Skibbens R. V., Salmon E. D. Oscillating mitotic newt lung cell kinetochores are, on average, under tension and rarely push. J Cell Sci. 1996 Dec;109(Pt 12):2823–2831. doi: 10.1242/jcs.109.12.2823. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  62. Wise D., Cassimeris L., Rieder C. L., Wadsworth P., Salmon E. D. Chromosome fiber dynamics and congression oscillations in metaphase PtK2 cells at 23 degrees C. Cell Motil Cytoskeleton. 1991;18(2):131–142. doi: 10.1002/cm.970180208. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  63. Wood K. W., Sakowicz R., Goldstein L. S., Cleveland D. W. CENP-E is a plus end-directed kinetochore motor required for metaphase chromosome alignment. Cell. 1997 Oct 31;91(3):357–366. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)80419-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  64. Wordeman L., Mitchison T. J. Identification and partial characterization of mitotic centromere-associated kinesin, a kinesin-related protein that associates with centromeres during mitosis. J Cell Biol. 1995 Jan;128(1-2):95–104. doi: 10.1083/jcb.128.1.95. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  65. Yucel J. K., Marszalek J. D., McIntosh J. R., Goldstein L. S., Cleveland D. W., Philp A. V. CENP-meta, an essential kinetochore kinesin required for the maintenance of metaphase chromosome alignment in Drosophila. J Cell Biol. 2000 Jul 10;150(1):1–11. doi: 10.1083/jcb.150.1.1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  66. Zhai Y., Kronebusch P. J., Borisy G. G. Kinetochore microtubule dynamics and the metaphase-anaphase transition. J Cell Biol. 1995 Nov;131(3):721–734. doi: 10.1083/jcb.131.3.721. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Biophysical Journal are provided here courtesy of The Biophysical Society

RESOURCES