Skip to main content
PMC home page
Biophysical Journal logoLink to Biophysical Journal
. 2002 Aug;83(2):880–898. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(02)75215-6

The role of Trp side chains in tuning single proton conduction through gramicidin channels.

Joseph A Gowen 1, Jeffrey C Markham 1, Sara E Morrison 1, Timothy A Cross 1, David D Busath 1, Eric J Mapes 1, Mark F Schumaker 1
PMCID: PMC1302193  PMID: 12124271

Abstract

We present an extensive set of measurements of proton conduction through gramicidin A (gA), B (gB), and M (gM) homodimer channels which have 4, 3, or 0 Trp residues at each end of the channel, respectively. In gA we find a shoulder separating two domains of conductance increasing with concentration, confirming the results of Eisenman, G., B. Enos, J. Hagglund, and J. Sandblom. 1980. Ann. NY. Acad. Sci. 339:8-20. In gB, the shoulder is shifted by approximately 1/2 pH unit to higher H(+) concentrations and is very sharply defined. No shoulder appears in the gM data, but an associated transition from sublinear to superlinear I-V values occurs at a 100-fold higher [H(+)] in gM than in gA. The data in the low concentration domain are analyzed using a configuration space model of single-proton conduction, assuming that the difference in the proton potential of mean force (PMF) between gA and its analogs is constant, similar to the results of Anderson, D., R. B. Shirts, T. A. Cross, and D. D. Busath. 2001. Biophys. J. 81:1255-1264. Our results suggest that the average amplitudes of the calculated proton PMFs are nearly correct, but that the water reorientation barrier calculated for gA by molecular dynamics using the PM6 water model (Pomès, R., and B. Roux. 1997. Biophys. J. 72:246a) must be reduced in amplitude by 1.5 kcal/mol or more, and is not rate-limiting for gA.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (442.3 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Andersen O. S. Graphic representation of the results of kinetic analyses. J Gen Physiol. 1999 Oct;114(4):589–590. doi: 10.1085/jgp.114.4.589. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Andersen O. S. Ion movement through gramicidin A channels. Interfacial polarization effects on single-channel current measurements. Biophys J. 1983 Feb;41(2):135–146. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(83)84415-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Anderson D. G., Shirts R. B., Cross T. A., Busath D. D. Noncontact dipole effects on channel permeation. V. Computed potentials for fluorinated gramicidin. Biophys J. 2001 Sep;81(3):1255–1264. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(01)75783-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Becker M. D., Greathouse D. V., Koeppe R. E., 2nd, Andersen O. S. Amino acid sequence modulation of gramicidin channel function: effects of tryptophan-to-phenylalanine substitutions on the single-channel conductance and duration. Biochemistry. 1991 Sep 10;30(36):8830–8839. doi: 10.1021/bi00100a015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Becker M. D., Koeppe R. E., 2nd, Andersen O. S. Amino acid substitutions and ion channel function. Model-dependent conclusions. Biophys J. 1992 Apr;62(1):25–27. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(92)81767-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Busath D. D. The use of physical methods in determining gramicidin channel structure and function. Annu Rev Physiol. 1993;55:473–501. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ph.55.030193.002353. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Busath D. D., Thulin C. D., Hendershot R. W., Phillips L. R., Maughan P., Cole C. D., Bingham N. C., Morrison S., Baird L. C., Hendershot R. J. Noncontact dipole effects on channel permeation. I. Experiments with (5F-indole)Trp13 gramicidin A channels. Biophys J. 1998 Dec;75(6):2830–2844. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(98)77726-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Chiu S. W., Jakobsson E., Subramaniam S., McCammon J. A. Time-correlation analysis of simulated water motion in flexible and rigid gramicidin channels. Biophys J. 1991 Jul;60(1):273–285. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(91)82049-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Chiu S. W., Subramaniam S., Jakobsson E. Simulation study of a gramicidin/lipid bilayer system in excess water and lipid. II. Rates and mechanisms of water transport. Biophys J. 1999 Apr;76(4):1939–1950. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(99)77353-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Corry B., Kuyucak S., Chung S. H. Tests of continuum theories as models of ion channels. II. Poisson-Nernst-Planck theory versus brownian dynamics. Biophys J. 2000 May;78(5):2364–2381. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(00)76781-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Cotten M., Fu R., Cross T. A. Solid-state NMR and hydrogen-deuterium exchange in a bilayer-solubilized peptide: structural and mechanistic implications. Biophys J. 1999 Mar;76(3):1179–1189. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(99)77282-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Cotten M., Tian C., Busath D. D., Shirts R. B., Cross T. A. Modulating dipoles for structure-function correlations in the gramicidin A channel. Biochemistry. 1999 Jul 20;38(29):9185–9197. doi: 10.1021/bi982981m. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Cukierman S. Proton mobilities in water and in different stereoisomers of covalently linked gramicidin A channels. Biophys J. 2000 Apr;78(4):1825–1834. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(00)76732-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Dorigo A. E., Anderson D. G., Busath D. D. Noncontact dipole effects on channel permeation. II. Trp conformations and dipole potentials in gramicidin A. Biophys J. 1999 Apr;76(4):1897–1908. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(99)77348-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Eisenman G., Enos B., Hägglund J., Sandblom J. Gramicidin as an example of a single-filing ionic channel. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1980;339:8–20. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1980.tb15964.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Heitz F., Spach G., Trudelle Y. Single channels of 9, 11, 13, 15-destryptophyl-phenylalanyl-gramicidin A. Biophys J. 1982 Oct;40(1):87–89. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(82)84462-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Hladky S. B. Can we use rate constants and state models to describe ion transport through gramicidin channels? Novartis Found Symp. 1999;225:93–112. doi: 10.1002/9780470515716.ch7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Hu W., Cross T. A. Tryptophan hydrogen bonding and electric dipole moments: functional roles in the gramicidin channel and implications for membrane proteins. Biochemistry. 1995 Oct 31;34(43):14147–14155. doi: 10.1021/bi00043a020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Hu W., Lazo N. D., Cross T. A. Tryptophan dynamics and structural refinement in a lipid bilayer environment: solid state NMR of the gramicidin channel. Biochemistry. 1995 Oct 31;34(43):14138–14146. doi: 10.1021/bi00043a019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Hu W., Lee K. C., Cross T. A. Tryptophans in membrane proteins: indole ring orientations and functional implications in the gramicidin channel. Biochemistry. 1993 Jul 13;32(27):7035–7047. doi: 10.1021/bi00078a032. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Jordan P. C. Electrostatic modeling of ion pores. Energy barriers and electric field profiles. Biophys J. 1982 Aug;39(2):157–164. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(82)84503-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Ketchem R., Roux B., Cross T. High-resolution polypeptide structure in a lamellar phase lipid environment from solid state NMR derived orientational constraints. Structure. 1997 Dec 15;5(12):1655–1669. doi: 10.1016/s0969-2126(97)00312-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Markham J. C., Gowen J. A., Cross T. A., Busath D. D. Comparison of gramicidin A and gramicidin M channel conductance dispersities. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2001 Aug 6;1513(2):185–192. doi: 10.1016/s0005-2736(01)00353-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Miller C. Ionic hopping defended. J Gen Physiol. 1999 Jun;113(6):783–787. doi: 10.1085/jgp.113.6.783. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Moy G., Corry B., Kuyucak S., Chung S. H. Tests of continuum theories as models of ion channels. I. Poisson-Boltzmann theory versus Brownian dynamics. Biophys J. 2000 May;78(5):2349–2363. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(00)76780-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Neher E., Sandblom J., Eisenman G. Ionic selectivity, saturation, and block in gramicidin A channels. II. Saturation behavior of single channel conductances and evidence for the existence of multiple binding sites in the channel. J Membr Biol. 1978 Apr 26;40(2):97–116. doi: 10.1007/BF01871143. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Phillips L. R., Cole C. D., Hendershot R. J., Cotten M., Cross T. A., Busath D. D. Noncontact dipole effects on channel permeation. III. Anomalous proton conductance effects in gramicidin. Biophys J. 2008 Nov 21;77(5):2492–2501. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(99)77085-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Pomès R., Roux B. Free energy profiles for H+ conduction along hydrogen-bonded chains of water molecules. Biophys J. 1998 Jul;75(1):33–40. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(98)77492-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Pomès R., Roux B. Structure and dynamics of a proton wire: a theoretical study of H+ translocation along the single-file water chain in the gramicidin A channel. Biophys J. 1996 Jul;71(1):19–39. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(96)79211-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Pomès Régis, Roux Benoît. Molecular mechanism of H+ conduction in the single-file water chain of the gramicidin channel. Biophys J. 2002 May;82(5):2304–2316. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(02)75576-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Quigley E. P., Crumrine D. S., Cukierman S. Gating and permeation in ion channels formed by gramicidin A and its dioxolane-linked dimer in Na(+) and Cs(+) solutions. J Membr Biol. 2000 Apr 1;174(3):207–212. doi: 10.1007/s002320001045. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Rokitskaya Tatyana I., Kotova Elena A., Antonenko Yuri N. Membrane dipole potential modulates proton conductance through gramicidin channel: movement of negative ionic defects inside the channel. Biophys J. 2002 Feb;82(2):865–873. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(02)75448-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Roux B. Influence of the membrane potential on the free energy of an intrinsic protein. Biophys J. 1997 Dec;73(6):2980–2989. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(97)78327-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Roux B. Statistical mechanical equilibrium theory of selective ion channels. Biophys J. 1999 Jul;77(1):139–153. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(99)76878-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Schumaker M. F., Pomès R., Roux B. A combined molecular dynamics and diffusion model of single proton conduction through gramicidin. Biophys J. 2000 Dec;79(6):2840–2857. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(00)76522-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Schumaker M. F., Pomès R., Roux B. Framework model for single proton conduction through gramicidin. Biophys J. 2001 Jan;80(1):12–30. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(01)75992-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Thompson N., Thompson G., Cole C. D., Cotten M., Cross T. A., Busath D. D. Noncontact dipole effects on channel permeation. IV. Kinetic model of 5F-Trp(13) gramicidin A currents. Biophys J. 2001 Sep;81(3):1245–1254. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(01)75782-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Urry D. W., Goodall M. C., Glickson J. D., Mayers D. F. The gramicidin A transmembrane channel: characteristics of head-to-head dimerized (L,D) helices. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1971 Aug;68(8):1907–1911. doi: 10.1073/pnas.68.8.1907. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Wallace B. A. Gramicidin channels and pores. Annu Rev Biophys Biophys Chem. 1990;19:127–157. doi: 10.1146/annurev.bb.19.060190.001015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Woolf T. B., Roux B. The binding site of sodium in the gramicidin A channel: comparison of molecular dynamics with solid-state NMR data. Biophys J. 1997 May;72(5):1930–1945. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(97)78839-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Woolley G. A., Wallace B. A. Model ion channels: gramicidin and alamethicin. J Membr Biol. 1992 Aug;129(2):109–136. doi: 10.1007/BF00219508. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. de Godoy C. M., Cukierman S. Modulation of proton transfer in the water wire of dioxolane-linked gramicidin channels by lipid membranes. Biophys J. 2001 Sep;81(3):1430–1438. doi: 10.1016/s0006-3495(01)75798-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Biophysical Journal are provided here courtesy of The Biophysical Society

RESOURCES