Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Biophysical Journal logoLink to Biophysical Journal
. 2002 Oct;83(4):1809–1819. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(02)73946-5

Concentration dependence of variability in growth rates of microtubules.

Susan Pedigo 1, Robley C Williams Jr 1
PMCID: PMC1302274  PMID: 12324403

Abstract

Growth and shortening of microtubules in the course of their polymerization and depolymerization have previously been observed to occur at variable rates. To gain insight into the meaning of this prominent variability, we studied the way in which its magnitude depends on the growth rate of experimentally observed and computer-simulated microtubules. The dynamic properties of plus-ended microtubules nucleated by pieces of Chlamydomonas flagellar axonemes were observed in real time by video-enhanced differential interference contrast light microscopy at differing tubulin concentrations. By means of a Monte Carlo algorithm, populations of microtubules were simulated that had similar growth and dynamic properties to the experimentally observed microtubules. By comparison of the experimentally observed and computer-simulated populations of microtubules, we found that 1) individual microtubules displayed an intrinsic variability that did not change as the rate of growth for a population increased, and 2) the variability was approximately fivefold greater than predicted by a simple model of subunit addition and loss. The model used to simulate microtubule growth has no provision for incorporation of lattice defects of any type, nor sophisticated geometry of the growing end. Thus, these as well as uncontrolled experimental variables were eliminated as causes for the prominent variability.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (122.8 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Banerjee A., Luduena R. F. Kinetics of colchicine binding to purified beta-tubulin isotypes from bovine brain. J Biol Chem. 1992 Jul 5;267(19):13335–13339. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Banerjee A., Roach M. C., Trcka P., Luduena R. F. Preparation of a monoclonal antibody specific for the class IV isotype of beta-tubulin. Purification and assembly of alpha beta II, alpha beta III, and alpha beta IV tubulin dimers from bovine brain. J Biol Chem. 1992 Mar 15;267(8):5625–5630. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bayley P. M., Schilstra M. J., Martin S. R. Microtubule dynamic instability: numerical simulation of microtubule transition properties using a Lateral Cap model. J Cell Sci. 1990 Jan;95(Pt 1):33–48. doi: 10.1242/jcs.95.1.33. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Billger M. A., Bhattacharjee G., Williams R. C., Jr, Bhatacharjee G. Dynamic instability of microtubules assembled from microtubule-associated protein-free tubulin: neither variability of growth and shortening rates nor "rescue" requires microtubule-associated proteins. Biochemistry. 1996 Oct 22;35(42):13656–13663. doi: 10.1021/bi9616965. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Billger M., Wallin M., Williams R. C., Jr, Detrich H. W., 3rd Dynamic instability of microtubules from cold-living fishes. Cell Motil Cytoskeleton. 1994;28(4):327–332. doi: 10.1002/cm.970280406. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Bradford M. M. A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Anal Biochem. 1976 May 7;72:248–254. doi: 10.1016/0003-2697(76)90527-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Bré M. H., Karsenti E. Effects of brain microtubule-associated proteins on microtubule dynamics and the nucleating activity of centrosomes. Cell Motil Cytoskeleton. 1990;15(2):88–98. doi: 10.1002/cm.970150205. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Carlier M. F., Pantaloni D. Kinetic analysis of guanosine 5'-triphosphate hydrolysis associated with tubulin polymerization. Biochemistry. 1981 Mar 31;20(7):1918–1924. doi: 10.1021/bi00510a030. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Chrétien D., Fuller S. D., Karsenti E. Structure of growing microtubule ends: two-dimensional sheets close into tubes at variable rates. J Cell Biol. 1995 Jun;129(5):1311–1328. doi: 10.1083/jcb.129.5.1311. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Chrétien D., Fuller S. D. Microtubules switch occasionally into unfavorable configurations during elongation. J Mol Biol. 2000 May 12;298(4):663–676. doi: 10.1006/jmbi.2000.3696. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Chrétien D., Metoz F., Verde F., Karsenti E., Wade R. H. Lattice defects in microtubules: protofilament numbers vary within individual microtubules. J Cell Biol. 1992 Jun;117(5):1031–1040. doi: 10.1083/jcb.117.5.1031. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Correia J. J., Baty L. T., Williams R. C., Jr Mg2+ dependence of guanine nucleotide binding to tubulin. J Biol Chem. 1987 Dec 25;262(36):17278–17284. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Correia J. J., Lobert S. Physiochemical aspects of tubulin-interacting antimitotic drugs. Curr Pharm Des. 2001 Sep;7(13):1213–1228. doi: 10.2174/1381612013397438. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Derry W. B., Wilson L., Khan I. A., Luduena R. F., Jordan M. A. Taxol differentially modulates the dynamics of microtubules assembled from unfractionated and purified beta-tubulin isotypes. Biochemistry. 1997 Mar 25;36(12):3554–3562. doi: 10.1021/bi962724m. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Detrich H. W., 3rd, Williams R. C. Reversible dissociation of the alpha beta dimer of tubulin from bovine brain. Biochemistry. 1978 Sep 19;17(19):3900–3907. doi: 10.1021/bi00612a002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Dhamodharan R., Wadsworth P. Modulation of microtubule dynamic instability in vivo by brain microtubule associated proteins. J Cell Sci. 1995 Apr;108(Pt 4):1679–1689. doi: 10.1242/jcs.108.4.1679. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Drechsel D. N., Hyman A. A., Cobb M. H., Kirschner M. W. Modulation of the dynamic instability of tubulin assembly by the microtubule-associated protein tau. Mol Biol Cell. 1992 Oct;3(10):1141–1154. doi: 10.1091/mbc.3.10.1141. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Drubin D. G., Kirschner M. W. Tau protein function in living cells. J Cell Biol. 1986 Dec;103(6 Pt 2):2739–2746. doi: 10.1083/jcb.103.6.2739. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Dye R. B., Williams R. C., Jr Assembly of microtubules from tubulin bearing the nonhydrolyzable guanosine triphosphate analogue GMPPCP [guanylyl 5'-(beta, gamma-methylenediphosphonate)]: variability of growth rates and the hydrolysis of GTP. Biochemistry. 1996 Nov 12;35(45):14331–14339. doi: 10.1021/bi961070e. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Erickson H. P., O'Brien E. T. Microtubule dynamic instability and GTP hydrolysis. Annu Rev Biophys Biomol Struct. 1992;21:145–166. doi: 10.1146/annurev.bb.21.060192.001045. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Gamblin T. C., Nachmanoff K., Halpain S., Williams R. C., Jr Recombinant microtubule-associated protein 2c reduces the dynamic instability of individual microtubules. Biochemistry. 1996 Sep 24;35(38):12576–12586. doi: 10.1021/bi961135d. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Gamblin T. C., Williams R. C., Jr Determination of microtubule polarity in vitro by the use of video-enhanced differential-interference contrast light microscopy and Chlamydomonas flagellar axonemal pieces. Anal Biochem. 1995 Nov 20;232(1):43–46. doi: 10.1006/abio.1995.9963. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Gildersleeve R. F., Cross A. R., Cullen K. E., Fagen A. P., Williams R. C., Jr Microtubules grow and shorten at intrinsically variable rates. J Biol Chem. 1992 Apr 25;267(12):7995–8006. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Goode B. L., Denis P. E., Panda D., Radeke M. J., Miller H. P., Wilson L., Feinstein S. C. Functional interactions between the proline-rich and repeat regions of tau enhance microtubule binding and assembly. Mol Biol Cell. 1997 Feb;8(2):353–365. doi: 10.1091/mbc.8.2.353. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Horio T., Hotani H. Visualization of the dynamic instability of individual microtubules by dark-field microscopy. Nature. 1986 Jun 5;321(6070):605–607. doi: 10.1038/321605a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Hoyle H. D., Raff E. C. Two Drosophila beta tubulin isoforms are not functionally equivalent. J Cell Biol. 1990 Sep;111(3):1009–1026. doi: 10.1083/jcb.111.3.1009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Hutchens J. A., Hoyle H. D., Turner F. R., Raff E. C. Structurally similar Drosophila alpha-tubulins are functionally distinct in vivo. Mol Biol Cell. 1997 Mar;8(3):481–500. doi: 10.1091/mbc.8.3.481. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Kowalski R. J., Williams R. C., Jr Microtubule-associated protein 2 alters the dynamic properties of microtubule assembly and disassembly. J Biol Chem. 1993 May 5;268(13):9847–9855. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Kowalski R. J., Williams R. C., Jr Unambiguous classification of microtubule-ends in vitro: dynamic properties of the plus- and minus-ends. Cell Motil Cytoskeleton. 1993;26(4):282–290. doi: 10.1002/cm.970260403. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Ludueña R. F. Multiple forms of tubulin: different gene products and covalent modifications. Int Rev Cytol. 1998;178:207–275. doi: 10.1016/s0074-7696(08)62138-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Mandelkow E. M., Mandelkow E., Milligan R. A. Microtubule dynamics and microtubule caps: a time-resolved cryo-electron microscopy study. J Cell Biol. 1991 Sep;114(5):977–991. doi: 10.1083/jcb.114.5.977. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Martin S. R., Schilstra M. J., Bayley P. M. Dynamic instability of microtubules: Monte Carlo simulation and application to different types of microtubule lattice. Biophys J. 1993 Aug;65(2):578–596. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(93)81091-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Melki R., Fievez S., Carlier M. F. Continuous monitoring of Pi release following nucleotide hydrolysis in actin or tubulin assembly using 2-amino-6-mercapto-7-methylpurine ribonucleoside and purine-nucleoside phosphorylase as an enzyme-linked assay. Biochemistry. 1996 Sep 17;35(37):12038–12045. doi: 10.1021/bi961325o. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Mitchison T., Kirschner M. Dynamic instability of microtubule growth. Nature. 1984 Nov 15;312(5991):237–242. doi: 10.1038/312237a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Odde D. J., Cassimeris L., Buettner H. M. Kinetics of microtubule catastrophe assessed by probabilistic analysis. Biophys J. 1995 Sep;69(3):796–802. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(95)79953-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Odde D. J. Estimation of the diffusion-limited rate of microtubule assembly. Biophys J. 1997 Jul;73(1):88–96. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(97)78050-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Oosawa F. Size distribution of protein polymers. J Theor Biol. 1970 Apr;27(1):69–86. doi: 10.1016/0022-5193(70)90129-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Panda D., Goode B. L., Feinstein S. C., Wilson L. Kinetic stabilization of microtubule dynamics at steady state by tau and microtubule-binding domains of tau. Biochemistry. 1995 Sep 5;34(35):11117–11127. doi: 10.1021/bi00035a017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Panda D., Miller H. P., Banerjee A., Ludueña R. F., Wilson L. Microtubule dynamics in vitro are regulated by the tubulin isotype composition. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1994 Nov 22;91(24):11358–11362. doi: 10.1073/pnas.91.24.11358. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Pierson G. B., Burton P. R., Himes R. H. Alterations in number of protofilaments in microtubules assembled in vitro. J Cell Biol. 1978 Jan;76(1):223–228. doi: 10.1083/jcb.76.1.223. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Pryer N. K., Walker R. A., Skeen V. P., Bourns B. D., Soboeiro M. F., Salmon E. D. Brain microtubule-associated proteins modulate microtubule dynamic instability in vitro. Real-time observations using video microscopy. J Cell Sci. 1992 Dec;103(Pt 4):965–976. doi: 10.1242/jcs.103.4.965. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Rodionov V. I., Borisy G. G. Microtubule treadmilling in vivo. Science. 1997 Jan 10;275(5297):215–218. doi: 10.1126/science.275.5297.215. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Schnapp B. J. Viewing single microtubules by video light microscopy. Methods Enzymol. 1986;134:561–573. doi: 10.1016/0076-6879(86)34121-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Shelden E., Wadsworth P. Observation and quantification of individual microtubule behavior in vivo: microtubule dynamics are cell-type specific. J Cell Biol. 1993 Feb;120(4):935–945. doi: 10.1083/jcb.120.4.935. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Simon J. R., Salmon E. D. The structure of microtubule ends during the elongation and shortening phases of dynamic instability examined by negative-stain electron microscopy. J Cell Sci. 1990 Aug;96(Pt 4):571–582. doi: 10.1242/jcs.96.4.571. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Tran P. T., Joshi P., Salmon E. D. How tubulin subunits are lost from the shortening ends of microtubules. J Struct Biol. 1997 Mar;118(2):107–118. doi: 10.1006/jsbi.1997.3844. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Tran P. T., Walker R. A., Salmon E. D. A metastable intermediate state of microtubule dynamic instability that differs significantly between plus and minus ends. J Cell Biol. 1997 Jul 14;138(1):105–117. doi: 10.1083/jcb.138.1.105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Walker R. A., O'Brien E. T., Pryer N. K., Soboeiro M. F., Voter W. A., Erickson H. P., Salmon E. D. Dynamic instability of individual microtubules analyzed by video light microscopy: rate constants and transition frequencies. J Cell Biol. 1988 Oct;107(4):1437–1448. doi: 10.1083/jcb.107.4.1437. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Williams R. C., Jr, Lee J. C. Preparation of tubulin from brain. Methods Enzymol. 1982;85(Pt B):376–385. doi: 10.1016/0076-6879(82)85038-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Wilson P. G., Borisy G. G. Evolution of the multi-tubulin hypothesis. Bioessays. 1997 Jun;19(6):451–454. doi: 10.1002/bies.950190603. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Witman G. B. Isolation of Chlamydomonas flagella and flagellar axonemes. Methods Enzymol. 1986;134:280–290. doi: 10.1016/0076-6879(86)34096-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Biophysical Journal are provided here courtesy of The Biophysical Society

RESOURCES