Skip to main content
Wiley Open Access Collection logoLink to Wiley Open Access Collection
. 2026 Mar 27;56(4):e70196. doi: 10.1111/eci.70196

MYH11 variants in thoracic aortic aneurysm pathophysiology: From bench to bedside

Aria Atash 1, Barend M E Mees 2, Maarten J Cramer 1, Annette F Baas 1, Leon J Schurgers 3, Pieter A Doevendans 1,4,5, Francesca Stillitano 1,4,
PMCID: PMC13022802  PMID: 41891259

Abstract

Background

Thoracic aortic aneurysms and dissections (TAAD) are life‐threatening vascular disorders affecting the medial layer of the aortic wall, associated with high mortality when a rupture or dissection occurs. Though numerous genes are associated with familial TAAD (FTAAD), pathogenic variants in MYH11, encoding smooth muscle cell specific myosin heavy chain (SM‐MHC), represent a rare but interesting subgroup as many gaps remain in the knowledge of disease mechanisms, phenotype presentation and gene–environmental interactions. No reliable therapy exists in halting aneurysm growth in affected individuals.

Scope of Review

This review aims to summarize current evidence on disease pathophysiological mechanisms. Furthermore, phenotypic variability, extrathoracic vascular involvement and the possibility of future curative gene therapy options are evaluated.

Findings

Most reported pathogenic MYH11 variants are missense or splice‐site variants that disrupt the C‐terminal coiled‐coil dimerization and therefore thick filament assembly. Evidence from mouse models, patient‐derived cells and limited human ex vivo tissue studies shows that these variants are associated with impaired thick filament organization, reduced force generation and disruption of the elastin‐contractile unit, with subsequent alterations in ECM remodelling. However, the precise causal sequence in human disease has not yet been established. Clinically, MYH11‐associated disease is associated with FTAAD and patent ductus arteriosus (PDA). Reduced penetrance, variable expression of disease and unknown potential gene–environment interactions complicate risk prediction and clinical counselling of affected individuals. Emerging RNA‐therapy strategies aimed at allele‐specific correction of genetic disease offer interesting future therapeutic targets, although vascular delivery and long‐term safety remain challenges.

Conclusion

MYH11 should be viewed as a clinically meaningful gene that is associated with TAAD and PDA. Current limited evidence shows that the phenotype is characterized by contractile dysfunction, increased aortic stiffness and potential susceptibility to hemodynamic stress. Future work should investigate translatable mechanistic studies, larger registries for genotype–phenotype correlations and evaluation of targeted gene therapy approaches.

Keywords: aortic aneurysm, aortic dissection, genetically triggered aortopathy, MYH11


Thoracic aortic aneurysms and dissections (TAAD) are often asymptomatic until rupture or dissection, which are associated with high mortality. Around 20% of cases of TAAD show familial segregation; some of these are linked to pathogenic variants in vascular smooth muscle cell contractile genes, like MYH11. These variants impair myosin heavy chain function, leading to variable penetrance and phenotypic expression. This review outlines the clinical and mechanistic features of MYH11‐related TAAD and explores innovative gene‐based therapeutic strategies for targeted future management. FTAAD, familial thoracic aneurysms and dissection; ↕ indicates the interaction between two neighbouring structures. Figure generated using BioRender.com.

graphic file with name ECI-56-e70196-g002.jpg

1. INTRODUCTION

Thoracic aortic aneurysms and dissections (TAAD) are severe cardiovascular disorders affecting the medial layer of the aortic wall. Aneurysms are often asymptomatic but tend to grow in size over time, increasing the risk of a life‐threatening dissection or rupture. 1 This progressive growth is influenced by several well known risk factors, including a larger initial aneurysm size, distal aneurysm location and the presence of Marfan syndrome or a bicuspid aortic valve (BAV). 2 Though a significant association between BAV and TAAD has been established, 3 there is currently no evidence for a direct MYH11‐BAV genetic link. Population‐based studies estimate the incidence of aortic dissection to be approximately 6 cases per 100,000 individuals, 4 with consistently higher rates reported in men (~16.3 per 100,000) compared with women (~9.1 per 100,000). 5 Acute aortic dissections are associated with high mortality rates. For Stanford type A dissections, 48.6% of patients die before arrival to a hospital. Among the admitted patients, the 30‐day mortality rate is 47.4% for type A and 13.3.% for type B dissections. 4 These estimates are drawn from large population studies but span multiple decades and should therefore be interpreted in the context of evolving imaging, triage and surgical management. Aortic aneurysms and dissections are grouped as either syndromic or non‐syndromic. Syndromic TAAD, occurs in the context of syndromic connective tissue disorders such as Marfan syndrome, vascular Ehlers‐Danlos syndrome and Loeys‐Dietz syndrome and is caused by pathogenic variants in genes encoding extracellular matrix (ECM) components or regulators of TGF‐β signalling pathways. 6 , 7 In contrast, non‐syndromic cases may be sporadic or familial TAAD (FTAAD), 6 meaning at least a first‐degree family member is also affected. The familial group comprises 15%–21% of all TAAD cases, 8 , 9 which lack syndromic features, making early identification challenging.

Many genes have been identified in association with FTAAD. Most encode proteins involved in smooth muscle force generation and contractility, like ACTA2 (smooth muscle alpha actin), 10 MYH11 (myosin heavy chain), 11 MYLK (myosin light chain kinase) 12 and PRKG1 (cGMP‐dependent protein kinase). 13 Other, less studied, genes include LOX (lysyl oxidase), FOXE3 (forkhead transcription factor), MAT2A (methionine adenosyltransferase II) and ARIH1 (Ariadne RBR E3 Ubiquitin Proteinase Ligase 1). 6 MYH11, encoding smooth muscle cell‐specific myosin heavy chain (SM‐MHC), is a recognized genetic cause of FTAAD, particularly in conjunction with patent ductus arteriosus (PDA). 14 Consistent with this association, pathogenic MYH11 variants were identified in 50% of probands (1/2) 15 in a cohort enriched for TAAD with PDA. In contrast, studies screening mixed TAAD cohorts report a very low prevalence of MYH11‐associated disease (<.1%). 16 , 17 Case reports further demonstrate that MYH11 variants occur in multiple families worldwide that present with PDA, TAAD, or even extra‐thoracic vascular abnormalities. 11 , 15 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28

Mechanistic and registry‐based studies of MYH11 variants are scarce, limiting our understanding of disease pathophysiology and genotype–phenotype correlations. This uncertainty limits clinicians in the counsel and prognosis of patients, particularly for asymptomatic variant carriers identified through cascade screening. Current management strategies rely on risk‐factor optimization and surgical intervention upon pre‐defined aneurysm size thresholds, as no targeted treatments exist for slowing down aneurysm growth. 29 , 30 Targeted therapies are especially relevant for FTAAD associated with pathogenic MYH11 variants, due to their more aggressive disease course compared to sporadic TAAD. These cases may exhibit an earlier onset, faster aneurysm growth rates (.21 cm/year for FTAAD vs. .16 cm/year for sporadic and .10 cm/year for Marfan patients) and dissections at smaller diameters, 8 as well as a 10‐year mortality rate of 7.8%, which is comparable to that seen in Marfan syndrome (8.7%). 31 This review outlines current clinical and mechanistic insights into MYH11‐related TAAD and discusses emerging therapeutic strategies like gene‐based approaches for targeted treatment.

2. THE VASCULAR CONTRACTILE UNIT CONSISTS OF SMOOTH MUSCLE CELLS AND INTERACTS WITH THE EXTRACELLULAR MATRIX

Vascular smooth muscle cells (vSMCs) are organized in circumferential layers embedded between elastin lamellae (large arteries) or in a connective tissue matrix (smaller arteries). In the ascending aorta, the vascular tunica media wall is formed by more than 60 layers of vSMC and elastic lamellae, as visible in the transverse section in Figure 1. 32 The contractile unit of vSMC, consists of a SMC‐specific isoform of actin (SM actin; encoded by ACTA2), which forms the thin filament upon oligomerization. Additionally, the thick filament is composed of smooth muscle (SM) myosin proteins. SM‐myosin is a hexameric protein that consists of two SMC‐specific myosin heavy chains (SM‐MHC; encoded by MYH11) proteins, along with two regulatory light chains (RLC) and two essentials light chains (ELC) (depicted in distinct colours in Figure 2). 1 Myosin is a motor protein that upon interaction with actin, generates force using energy produced from ATP hydrolysis (Figure 2).

FIGURE 1.

FIGURE 1

Schematic representation of the vascular smooth muscle cell elastin‐contractile unit. In the large arteries, the tunica media contains many layers of vascular smooth muscle cells organized between lamellae of elastin fibres. The contractile elements – the thick and thin filament, consisting of Actin and myosin proteins respectively – are connected to the extracellular matrix through focal adhesions on the cell membrane, which contain integrin receptors. The integrin receptors then bind to fibrillin containing microfibrils in the ECM that in turn connect to the elastin fibres. Diseases affecting each part of this unit can result in secondary changes resulting in adverse remodelling of the ECM. This image was created using BioRender.com.

FIGURE 2.

FIGURE 2

Disrupted myosin dimerization results in unstable acto‐myosin connections and reduced contractility. (A) Smooth muscle cell myosin dimer (encoded by MYH11) is shown with regulatory light chain (RLC) in pink and essential light chain in yellow. Upon phosphorylation of Ser19 on the RLC by activated MLCK, the myosin motor head domains change conformation allowing the Actin binding sites to be accessible. This eventually allows for ATP‐dependent binding of the motor heads to Actin filaments in a cyclic manner, shortening the contractile element and resulting in contraction. (B) In the case of mutant SM‐MHC proteins, the polymerization of thick filament is affected, disrupting the contractile apparatus. Disruptions in the contractile element with the ECM affects efficient force generation. This leads to the hypothesis that MYH11 mutant SM‐MHC cause reduced contractility and subsequent force generation. CaM, calmodulin; MYLK, myosin light chain kinase. This image was created using BioRender.com.

The C‐terminal rods of MHC dimerize to form elongated alpha‐helical coiled‐coil domains, which are responsible for polymerization of myosin, leading to the formation of thick filaments. The level arm – connecting the coiled‐coil domain to the motor head – binds the essential and regulatory light chains. The N‐terminal region contains the motor domains with binding sites for ATP and actin, which are crucial for cross‐bridging with actin filaments. In vSMCs, contraction is regulated by intracellular calcium. Mechanical, neural and chemical stimuli can trigger calcium influx. Calcium then binds the intracellular calmodulin (CaM) and activates myosin light chain kinase (MYLK). Once activated, MYLK phosphorylates the RLC at the Serine 19 position, enabling the activation of the actin‐dependent ATPase, located on the globular motor head. 1 , 33 This process allows for the cross‐bridging of myosin with actin filaments and subsequent force generation (Figure 2 panel A).

Efficient force generation requires anchoring of the actomyosin apparatus to ECM proteins through integrin‐based focal adhesions on the cell membrane. These adhesion proteins ensure structural connection with intracellular microfibrils, connecting the actomyosin apparatus and elastin (Figure 1). 1 , 32 The interaction between vSMC and the ECM is a highly dynamic and interactive process. The ECM confers biochemical and mechano‐transduction signalling pathways (which are integrin mediated) that can influence vSMC cellular processes like contractility, stiffness, migration, proliferation and remodelling.

3. PHENOTYPE AND CLINICAL CHARACTERISTICS

In 2004, Khau Van Kien et al. reported a French family with aortic aneurysms and PDA, suggesting a single genetic component explaining both conditions. 14 Later, they identified MYH11 as the causative gene. 11 A similar association between TAAD and PDA was also reported earlier in three generations of an American family. 19 It has since been established that pathogenic variants in MYH11 are inherited in an autosomal dominant pattern and can result in TAAD with PDA. 8 , 11 To date, both missense and splice‐site variants segregating with disease have been reported in multiple families worldwide, as is outlined in Table 1. Despite the lack of comprehensive registry studies with detailed clinical course descriptions of pathogenic MYH11 variants, we know that within familial TAAD cohorts, males are more commonly affected with an earlier onset of disease. 8 Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) studies of affected families demonstrate lower aortic compliance and higher pulse wave velocity in MYH11 pathogenic variant carriers compared to similarly aged non‐carrier relatives. 11 This trend is also observed in young asymptomatic carriers, suggesting that increased aortic stiffness might be an early sign of disease onset. Interpretation of the abovementioned results is limited by the rarity of MYH11‐associated TAAD, small numbers of deeply affected families, heterogeneous variants and reporting bias inherent to case‐report driven literature. In turn, genotype–phenotype correlations remain poorly understood. MYH11 variants show incomplete penetrance and variable disease expression, 26 the basis of which remains unclear. Adding to the seemingly complex disease expression, extrathoracic aneurysms, dissections or vascular abnormalities in the abdominal aorta and in cerebral arteries have also been reported linked to MYH11 variants. 23 , 25 , 34 Additionally, it seems that MYH11 variants cause a phenotype that overlaps with other genes associated with FTAAD, particularly ACTA2. ACTA2 stands out as the predominant gene linked to FTAAD, accounting for 12–21% of cases. 6 , 35 Beyond TAAD, the ACTA2 profile is linked to occlusive vessel disease that has been reported to contribute to premature ischemic stroke and coronary artery disease. 10 , 15 , 36 Recent case reports have also described stroke and steno‐occlusive artery disease in relation to MYH11 variants, 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 suggesting a potential overlap in phenotype that requires confirmation in larger cohorts.

TABLE 1.

MYH11 gene pathogenic variants segregating with TAAD and PDA.

Pathogenic variant MYH11 gene Transcriptional/translational consequence Phenotype Family origin Ref

1. c.4578 + 1G>T/IVS32 + 1G>T

2. c. 5361 G>A (exon 37)

1. Loss exon 32; p.L1456_N1526del

2. p.R1758Q

TAAD/PDA, aortic stiffness French 11
c.3810_3881del (exon 28) p.R1241_L1264del TAAD/PDA American 19
c.4578 + 1G>A/IVS32 + 1G>A Loss of exon 32 TAAD/PDA American/European 15
c.4599 + 1delG Loss of exon 33 PDA American 37
c.4578 + 3A>G/IVS32 + 3A>G Loss of exon 32 TAAD/PDA French 21

1. c.3791 T>C /c.3824G>T (exon 28)

2. c.3824G>T

1. p.L1264P

2. p.R1275L

TAAD/PDA American (2 families) 18
c. 3728 T>C (exon 28) p.L1243P TAAD/PDA Chinese 27
c.3766_3768delAAG p.K1256del TAAD/PDA

Japanese (2 families)

Dutch

20, 26
c.3879 + 1G>A (exon 29)

p.Val1268_Gln1293del

Exon 29 skipping (p.Ala1225_Gln1293del)

TAAD French* 38
c.3791 T>C (exon 28) p.L1264P TAAD Japanese 28
c.766 A>G p.Ile256Val PDA Chinese 40
c.4366A>C p.Lys1456Gln Ductus arteriosus aneurysm and intestinal atresia Unspecified 41

Note: The data above is included from all reported variants in MYH11 associated with a disease phenotype. Where reported, the family of origin is included in the table, the asterix (*) denotes uncertain origins.

4. EXON SKIPPING IN MYH11 SPLICE‐SITE VARIANTS

The first described MYH11 pathogenic variants consisted of two heterozygous variants: a substitution of guanine with thymine at a splice‐donor site within intron 32 (IVS 32 + 1G>T), while the second mutation was a missense variant in exon 37 (G5361 > A). 11 Using cDNA amplification and sequencing techniques, researchers showed that the IVS 32 + 1G>T variant results in exon 32 (213 bp) skipping leading to an in‐frame loss of 71 amino acids (L1456_N1526del) at the C‐terminal coiled‐coil region of the SM‐MHC protein. 11 , 21 Subsequently, in an American kindred, it was shown that the pathogenic variant located in exon 28 (3810_3881del) also causes an in‐frame deletion (R1241_L1264del) in the same region of the SM‐MHC. 19 Similar splice‐site variants have been described (c.4578 + 1G>A, 15 c.4578 + 3A>C, 21 and c.4599 + 1delG 37 ), which were predicted or have shown to induce exon skipping. Evidence suggests that pathogenic MYH11 variants have a dominant negative mechanism, 11 , 18 indicating that the mutant SM‐MHC interferes with adequate function of the wild‐type protein. 38 This is commonly seen in homomeric protein structures, where the mutant subunit destabilizes the correct protein assembly. 38 Together, these observations show that several splice‐site variants can lead to recurrent exon skipping affecting the coiled‐coil domain (see Figure 3), suggesting a convergent RNA‐level mechanism for these MYH11 variants. But whether this applies to missense or other variant classes is unclear.

FIGURE 3.

FIGURE 3

Gene, RNA and protein. At a genomic (DNA), transcriptional (RNA) and protein level, the defects as a result of MYH11 (splice‐site) variants are visualized. The splice site variants as reported in the main text suggest exon skipping as a recurrent defect. Both missense variants and splice‐site variants show alterations in the coiled‐coil region of the SM‐MHC protein, leading to altered dimerization.

5. MECHANISMS INVOLVED IN ANEURYSM PATHOPHYSIOLOGY AND THE ROLE OF SM‐MHC

5.1. Disturbed mechanotransduction and vascular remodelling: Evidence from experimental models

Many reported MYH11 variants result in in‐frame amino acid deletions in the coiled‐coil domain of SM‐MHC. This disrupts proper myosin polymerization and abnormal actin‐myosin interaction, altering force generation (Figure 2). 11 Western blot analysis of MYH11 mutant primary vSMCs shows that mutant and wild‐type SM‐MHC interact abnormally, which suggests dimer instability and altered thick filament assembly. 11 Consequently, the contractile‐elastin unit is disrupted resulting in altered force generation, 39 but also secondary responses, including matrix metalloproteases (MMP) release with subsequent ECM degradation. This abnormal remodelling weakens the vessel wall, further leading to reduced contractility and increased aortic stiffness. 40 , 41 The association of PDA with pathogenic MYH11 variants may reflect impaired vSMC contractility, as ductus closure, a process that is normally completed within weeks in full‐term neonates, is not only driven by oxygen tension, reduced ductal blood flow and processes like apoptosis, dedifferentiation, but also contractile constriction. 42 Supporting this, MYH11 knockout mice show delayed ductus closure, 43 highlighting SM‐MHC's role.

The importance of a functional actomyosin network for vSMC adhesion to the ECM is demonstrated in the pathological K1256del variant, identified in two independent Japanese families with FTAAD and PDA. 20 This variant disrupts a lysine cluster (K1253‐K1256), disrupting the coiled‐coil domain. Structural analysis revealed disruption of hydrophobic residues necessary for the coiled‐coil formation of the SM‐MHC dimer, causing aberrant thick filament assembly and therefore actomyosin dysfunction. 37 RNA sequencing of MYH11 delK/+ aortas revealed downregulation of adhesion‐related genes, such as Ctnna2 (alpha‐catenin) and Itga2 (integrin subunit alpha 2), crucial for vSMC focal adhesions. 37 As focal adhesions mediate ECM‐contractile apparatus signalling, MYH11 variants, in part, affect mechano‐transduction through impaired focal adhesions. Together, these data support the notion of impaired force generation to the ECM through disrupted thick filament assembly secondary to perturbed adhesion‐mediated signalling. However, much of the detailed mechanistic evidence is derived from a limited number of variants and mouse studies. Therefore, while the reports of coiled‐coil domain disturbances in various MYH11 variants suggest potential shared mechanisms, the extent to which these mechanisms can be generalized to a broader spectrum of variants remains to be established.

Homozygous MYH11 delK1256/delK1256 mice exhibited PDA and reduced aortic elastic lamellae, 37 consistent with previous histological observations. 15 , 18 , 37 Elastin loss impairs mechano‐transduction, predisposing the vascular wall to maladaptive remodelling upon mechanical stress. In the heterozygous MYH11 delK/+ mice, aortic dissections and/or intramural hematomas occurred after a 2‐week angiotensin II infusion, despite comparable angiotensin II type 1 receptors expression in mutant and wild‐type vSMCs. This is consistent with the contribution of hemodynamic stress – such as hypertension – in disease manifestation. Direct demonstration of these mechanisms potentially contributing to disease in human aortic tissue is limited.

5.2. ECM degradation and medial remodelling

In symptomatic and asymptomatic pathogenic MYH11 human carriers, a magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) study reports reduced aortic compliance and increased stiffness. 11 These findings are consistent with histological observations from limited human tissue samples retrieved from surgical specimens, which reveal areas of elastic fibre loss and fragmentation, along with collagen accumulation in the aortic media of patients. 15 , 18 Furthermore, some areas exhibit disorganization and loss of vSMC alongside medial degeneration, while other regions display vSMC hyperplasia and occluded vasa vasorum. 18 Collectively, these findings support a process of vessel wall remodelling characterized by ECM degeneration and loss of vSMC, although the relative contribution of primary contractile dysfunction versus secondary signalling responses is yet unknown. Regulatory pathways associated with ECM remodelling, such as the transforming growth factor‐β (TGF‐β), have previously been linked to aortic disease and aneurysm formation. 18 , 39

5.3. The role of the TGF‐β pathway

TGF‐β is a pro‐fibrotic cytokine and part of the superfamily of TGF‐β receptors and ligands. Produced by various cells, it regulates responses like angiogenesis, proliferation, immunosuppression and ECM protein production. 39 , 44 The TGF‐β signalling pathway maintains vascular wall integrity through tightly regulated ECM deposition and degradation. 44 , 45 However, excessive TGF‐β expression is associated with fibrosis and dysfunction of multiple organs, such as the heart and vasculature. 45 In cardiac disease, TGF‐β upregulation was initially considered part of adverse remodelling following myocardial infarction, but is now recognized as a pathological driver in conditions like ischemic and hypertrophic cardiomyopathy and valvular disease. 45 TGF‐β ligands and receptors are implicated in connective tissue disorders like Loeys‐Dietz syndrome. 7 Variants in TGF‐β signalling cascade related genes suggest that dysregulation in the TGF‐β pathway is implicated broadly in abnormal vascular remodelling, resulting in (fast growing) aneurysms. In aneurysms associated with MYH11 variants, the role of TGF‐β signalling in disease pathophysiology seems more indirect. Studies show increased TGF‐β in vascular tissue and increased angiotensin II, 18 , 45 , 46 indicating pro‐fibrotic remodelling. However, the driving pathological stimulus or mechanism linking the TGF‐β pathway to MYH11‐related vascular disorders remains unclear. 44 In summary, maladaptive or pathological remodelling – partly driven by altered TGF‐β signalling and elastin degradation, secondary to disturbed actomyosin‐elastin interaction, may contribute to aortic aneurysm development in MYH11 carriers, as visualized in Figure 4. An overview of the known pathophysiological consequences of MYH11 pathogenic variants is shown in Figure 4.

FIGURE 4.

FIGURE 4

Mechanistic consequences of MYH11 variants in thoracic aortic aneurysms. A summary of the known pathophysiological mechanisms involved in the development of MYH11‐related disease: Defective interactions of contractile unit with ECM; elastin degradation with upregulated matrix metalloproteases (MMPs) and TGF‐β upregulation.

6. GENE THERAPY FOR THE TREATMENT OF TAAD

Currently no targeted therapy exists for the prevention or attenuation of aneurysm growth in non‐syndromic TAAD. The routine prescribed angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors aim to mitigate the upregulated ACE response observed in MYH11 mutant aortic tissue, 18 , 47 however, curative options are lacking. Recent advances in the field of gene therapy demonstrated successful outcomes for some genetic diseases. 48 , 49 , 50 RNA‐based approaches have shown promise in genetic disorders affecting muscle function, such as the FDA approved ASO therapy for spinal muscular atrophy 51 , 52 and Duchenne muscular dystrophy. 53 Kim et al. previously succeeded in the personalized development of an antisense oligonucleotide (ASO) targeting a splicing error associated with a form of Batten's disease, a rare and fatal neurodegenerative disease that mainly affects young patients. The RNA therapy alleviated patient symptoms and appeared to have an acceptable side‐effect profile due to the local (intrathecal) administration. 54 The ASO therapy was developed within 3 years of patient presentation, mainly motivated by the severe clinical presentation of the 6‐year‐old patient. The rapidly progressing field of RNA‐based therapy holds promise for the treatment of TAAD caused by MYH11. In principle, correcting recurrent splice defects or suppressing dominant‐negative protein interactions could reduce mutant SM‐MHC burden and might improve disease phenotype. However, currently no such treatments have been tested, so it remains to be proven if such strategies could halt aneurysm growth or prevent the need for surgical intervention.

Considering that previously reported MYH11 splice site variants produce recurrent exon‐skipping, which affects the SM‐MCH coiled‐coil domain, allele‐specific silencing or splice correction would be interesting therapeutic strategies. By reducing the expression of the mutant allele, dominant negative interference could be mitigated and SM‐MHC function may be restored. Short interfering RNA (siRNA) and ASO can be used to achieve the above mentioned. These RNA therapy strategies have gained increasing attention for the regulation of gene expression in recent years, with experimental data supporting a myriad of RNA therapeutic strategies. 55 , 56 ASOs and siRNA are synthetic single‐stranded RNAs designed to silence a gene or specific allele by binding to complementary target sequences, such as aberrant MYH11 mRNA sequence, thereby preventing protein translation. 55 Though deficient in functional studies, MYH11 gene deletion in mice has been shown to result in the survival of mice, suggesting reduced total SM‐MHC expression could result in functional vSMCs. 57 Though promising, this notion does not directly imply preserved vascular biomechanics or long‐term safety and does not directly model therapeutic partial knockdown in human vasculature.

Major translational barriers exist in the efficient delivery of treatments to the aortic media, including smooth muscle cell specificity, retention, dosage intervals, off‐target and immunogenicity assessment. Nevertheless, the rapidly advancing field of gene therapy within cardiovascular diseases offers cautious optimism for future management of familial TAAD.

7. DISCUSSION

Pathogenic variants in the MYH11 gene are associated with non‐syndromic TAAD, often with PDA. In this review we highlighted research investigating pathogenic variants within MYH11 and their role in the pathophysiology of the disease. Pathogenic variants in the MYH11 account for a small but distinct subset of familial TAAD, specifically in conjunction with PDA. This review integrates clinical data, genetic evidence and mechanistic studies to outline current knowledge on how alterations in SM‐MHC due to MYH11 variants disrupt structural and functional integrity of the aortic wall leading to aneurysm formation. MYH11 encodes smooth muscle specific MHC, a major contractile protein in all vSMCs. Although some rare missense variants show no complete segregation, 26 pathogenic variants in MYH11 have been identified in multiple families, correlating with TAAD, increased aortic stiffness and PDA. 11 , 15 , 18 , 19 , 21 , 27 , 28 , 58

While previous studies identified several pathophysiological aspects (increased TGF‐β signalling, SMC disarray and hyperplasia in aortic media and vasa vasorum leading to occlusion 18 ) linked to MYH11‐associated TAAD, a clear pathogenesis revealing the molecular and cellular consequences of the variants remains to be elucidated. Much of the mechanistic evidence is derived from mouse models and in vitro studies, with limited human studies; therefore, proposed causal effects in humans should be interpreted carefully. Furthermore, there are notable gaps in genotype–phenotype correlations, complicating the predictions and genetic counselling of asymptomatic family members. Clinically, the variable disease expression and reduced penetrance complicate risk assessment for asymptomatic carriers and can therefore contribute to increased uncertainty and experienced quality of life for patients. The reduced penetrance of MYH11 variants is substantiated by their presence in the general population, indicating that not all individuals with these variants develop TAAD. This is exemplified by the p.Lys1256del variant which is linked to TAAD, 26 , 37 and has been identified multiple times in the Genome Aggregation Database in the general population. A potential explanation could be the presence of other variants in other genes that play a role in the development of TAAD, pointing towards an oligogenic disease. However, to date there is insufficient data to affirm this hypothesis.

Though variants in MYH11 affect all vSMCs, their manifestation is often seen in the ascending aorta, which could be explained by higher mechanical strain and subsequent adverse remodelling in the aortic wall at that location. 18 , 59 However, abdominal aortic aneurysms and dissections have also been described in families with inherited TAAD. 34 Luijtgaarden et al., found a likely pathogenic MYH11 variant in a population comprising both sporadic and familial abdominal aortic aneurysm patients. 34 Furthermore, intracerebral aneurysms and vascular pathology associated with MYH11 variants are described in multiple cases 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 though these are considered to be a separate aneurysm entity. This raises the question of whether screening for MYH11 variants in cases of early onset and/or familial stroke or coronary artery disease is warranted and whether MYH11‐related vascular disease should be perceived as a systemic vasculopathy rather than solely within the context of TAAD. More MYH11 carriers could be identified this way, providing more screening options and leading to better insights into the seemingly complex genotype–phenotype correlations of pathogenic MYH11 variants. Tailored surveillance protocols and genetic counselling are essential for MYH11 pathogenic variant carriers. Achieving this requires improved MYH11‐specific gene–environment evidence, enabling clinicians to move beyond only managing conventional cardiovascular risk factors (e.g. hypertension) and to provide informed counselling on potentially relevant lifestyle contributors to disease progression, including physical activity.

In principle, the impact of detrimental dominant negative mutations as seen in MYH11 splice‐site variants can be counteracted by preventing the aberrant protein from being translated or overexpressing the wild type SM‐MHC protein, although the latter has not yet shown promising results yet in an experimental setting. 60 Recurrent exon 32 skipping caused by MYH11 splice‐site variants drives disease development and could serve as a specific therapeutical target for allele‐specific silencing. Although significant challenges remain, including in vivo vascular delivery and long‐term safety, successes in other monogenetic diseases have warranted careful optimism. 51 Given life‐threatening nature of genetic TAAD and the life‐long implications for entire families, with no options but waiting for surgical intervention, development of curative therapies may be particularly impactful.

Finally, the current literature is limited by the scarcity of large cohort studies and registries, also due to the rare nature of MYH11 variants. Coordinated global efforts to systematically collect genetic, clinical, environmental and molecular data would be crucial for advances in risk prediction, genotype‐based surveillance and future research into therapeutic strategies.

8. CONCLUSION

MYH11 variants are an uncommon but clinically significant cause of FTAAD, often associated with PDA and characterized by incomplete penetrance and variable disease expression. The exact pathophysiology is not fully elucidated, but available evidence supports convergent mechanisms for several coiled‐coil disrupting variants. More understanding of the interplay between genetic variants and environmental factors, mechanical stress and secondary signalling pathways (TGF‐β) may aid clinical counselling and the development of new therapeutic targets. RNA‐based therapies offer a promising avenue, especially considering the recurrent RNA defects seen in MYH11 splice‐site variants. Finally, international registry studies would aid in clarifying genotype–phenotype correlations.

AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS

AA performed the literature search and drafted the review; BM, MJC, AFB, LJC PAD and FS aided in the conception and design of the work, critically revised the work and provided final approval of the version to be submitted.

FUNDING INFORMATION

This work was supported by the ZonMw PSIDER‐Heart: From pluripotent stem cells to prime editing gene therapy for inherited cardiomyopathies grant (no 10250022110004), (to P.A.D.) the GEREMY project (European Union's Horizon Europe research and innovation program; no 101080204), (to P.A.D. and F.S.) and by the Stichting AVS Dierproefvrij: Pilot funding program (to A.A.).

CONFLICT OF INTEREST STATEMENT

None declared.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

We acknowledge the efforts of the RegMedXB Cardiovascular moonshot towards the development of regenerative medicine solutions to cure chronically ill patients.

DATA AVAILABILITY STATEMENT

Data sharing not applicable to this article as no datasets were generated or analysed during the current study.

REFERENCES

  • 1. Milewicz DM, Trybus KM, Guo DC, et al. Altered smooth muscle cell force generation as a driver of thoracic aortic aneurysms and dissections. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2017;37:26‐34. doi: 10.1161/atvbaha.116.303229 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Oladokun D, Patterson BO, Sobocinski J, et al. Systematic review of the growth rates and influencing factors in thoracic aortic aneurysms. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2016;51:674e681. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2016.01.017 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Frischhertz BP, Shamszad P, Pedroza C, Milewicz DM, Morris SA. Thoracic aortic dissection and rupture in conotruncal cardiac defects: A population‐based study. Int J Cardiol. 2015;184:521‐527. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Howard DPJ, Banerjee A, Fairhead JF, Perkins J, Silver LE, Rothwell PM. Population‐based study of incidence and outcome of acute aortic dissection and premorbid risk factor control. Circulation. 2013;127:2031‐2037. doi: 10.1161/circulationaha.112.000483 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Olsson C, Thelin S, StåHle E, Ekbom A, Granath F. Thoracic aortic aneurysm and dissection. Circulation. 2006;114:2611‐2618. doi: 10.1161/circulationaha.106.630400 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Ostberg N, Zafar M, Ziganshin B, Elefteriades J. The genetics of thoracic aortic aneurysms and dissection: A clinical perspective. Biomolecules. 2020;10:182. doi: 10.3390/biom10020182 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Takeda N, Komuro I. Genetic basis of hereditary thoracic aortic aneurysms and dissections. J Cardiol. 2019;74:136‐143. doi: 10.1016/j.jjcc.2019.03.014 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Albornoz G, Coady MA, Roberts M, et al. Familial thoracic aortic aneurysms and dissections—incidence, modes of inheritance, and phenotypic patterns. Ann Thorac Surg. 2006;82(4):1400‐1405. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2006.04.098 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Coady MA, Davies RR, Roberts M, et al. Familial patterns of thoracic aortic aneurysms. Arch Surg. 1999;134:361‐367. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.134.4.361 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Guo D‐C, Papke CL, Tran‐Fadulu V, et al. Mutations in smooth muscle alpha‐actin (ACTA2) cause coronary artery disease, stroke, and Moyamoya disease, along with thoracic aortic disease. Am J Hum Genet. 2009;84:617‐627. doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2009.04.007 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Zhu L, Vranckx R, van Kien PK, et al. Mutations in myosin heavy chain 11 cause a syndrome associating thoracic aortic aneurysm/aortic dissection and patent ductus arteriosus. Nat Genet. 2006;38:343‐349. doi: 10.1038/ng1721 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Wang L, Guo DC, Cao J, et al. Mutations in myosin light chain kinase cause familial aortic dissections. Am J Hum Genet. 2010;87:701‐707. doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2010.10.006 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Guo D‐C, Regalado E, Casteel DE, et al. Recurrent gain‐of‐function mutation in PRKG1 causes thoracic aortic aneurysms and acute aortic dissections. Am J Hum Genet. 2013;93:398‐404. doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2013.06.019 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Van Kien PK, Mathieu F, Zhu L, et al. Mapping of familial thoracic aortic aneurysm/dissection with patent ductus arteriosus to 16p12.2–p13.13. Circulation. 2005;112:200‐206. doi: 10.1161/circulationaha.104.506345 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Renard M, Callewaert B, Baetens M, et al. Novel MYH11 and ACTA2 mutations reveal a role for enhanced TGFβ signaling in FTAAD. Int J Cardiol. 2013;165:314‐321. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2011.08.079 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Francis C et al. A117–A118 (BMJ Publishing Group Ltd and British Cardiovascular Society).
  • 17. Weerakkody R, Ross D, Parry DA, et al. Targeted genetic analysis in a large cohort of familial and sporadic cases of aneurysm or dissection of the thoracic aorta. Genet Med. 2018;20:1414‐1422. doi: 10.1038/gim.2018.27 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Pannu H, Tran‐Fadulu V, Papke CL, et al. MYH11 mutations result in a distinct vascular pathology driven by insulin‐like growth factor 1 and angiotensin II. Hum Mol Genet. 2007;16:2453‐2462. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddm201 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Glancy DL, Wegmann M, Dhurandhar RW. Aortic dissection and patent ductus arteriosus in three generations. Am J Cardiol. 2001;87:813‐815. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Imai Y, Morita H, Takeda N, et al. A deletion mutation in myosin heavy chain 11 causing familial thoracic aortic dissection in two Japanese pedigrees. Int J Cardiol. 2015;15:195‐290. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2015.05.178 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Chesneau B, Plancke A, Rolland G, et al. A +3 variant at a donor splice site leads to a skipping of the MYH11 exon 32, a recurrent RNA defect causing heritable thoracic aortic aneurysm and dissection and/or patent ductus arteriosus. Mol Genet Genomic Med. 2021;9:e1814. doi: 10.1002/mgg3.1814 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Keylock A, Hong Y, Saunders D, et al. Moyamoya‐like cerebrovascular disease in a child with a novel mutation in myosin heavy chain 11. Neurology. 2018;90:136‐138. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000004828 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Ravindra VM, Karsy M, Schmidt RH, Taussky P, Park MS, Bollo RJ. Rapid de novo aneurysm formation after clipping of a ruptured middle cerebral artery aneurysm in an infant with an MYH11 mutation. J Neurosurg Pediatr. 2016;18:463‐470. doi: 10.3171/2016.5.peds16115 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Larson A, Rinaldo L, Brinjikji W, Klaas J, Lanzino G. Intracranial vessel stenosis in a young patient with an MYH11 mutation: A case report and review of 2 prior cases. World Neurosurg. 2020;137:243‐246. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2020.02.054 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Raghuram A, Sanchez S, Lu Y, et al. Cerebral arteriopathy and ischemic stroke in a pediatric MYH11 patient. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2023;32:106938. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2022.106938 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26. Harakalova M, van der Smagt J, de Kovel CGF, et al. Incomplete segregation of MYH11 variants with thoracic aortic aneurysms and dissections and patent ductus arteriosus. Eur J Hum Genet. 2013;21:487‐493. doi: 10.1038/ejhg.2012.206 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27. Pan M, Tan X, Sun T, et al. A harmful MYH11 variant detected in a family with thoracic aortic dissection and patent ductus arteriosus. Forensic Sci Med Pathol. 2023;20:212‐218. doi: 10.1007/s12024-023-00650-1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28. Takeda N, Morita H, Fujita D, et al. A deleterious MYH11 mutation causing familial thoracic aortic dissection. Human Genome Variation. 2015;2:15028. doi: 10.1038/hgv.2015.28 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29. Erbel R, Aboyans V, Boileau C, et al. 2014 ESC guidelines on the diagnosis and treatment of aortic diseases. Eur Heart J. 2014;35:2873‐2926. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehu281 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30. Goldfinger JZ, Halperin JL, Marin ML, Stewart AS, Eagle KA, Fuster V. Thoracic aortic aneurysm and dissection. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014;64:1725‐1739. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2014.08.025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31. Sherrah AG, Andvik S, van der Linde D, et al. Nonsyndromic thoracic aortic aneurysm and dissection: outcomes with Marfan syndrome versus bicuspid aortic valve aneurysm. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016;67:618‐626. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2015.11.039. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32. Davis EC. Smooth muscle cell to elastic lamina connections in developing mouse aorta. Role in aortic medial organization. Lab Investig. 1993;68:89‐99. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33. He W‐Q, Peng YJ, Zhang W‐C, et al. Myosin light chain kinase is central to smooth muscle contraction and required for gastrointestinal motility in mice. Gastroenterology. 2008;135:610‐620. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2008.05.032 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34. Van De Luijtgaarden KM, Heijsman D, Maugeri A, et al. First genetic analysis of aneurysm genes in familial and sporadic abdominal aortic aneurysm. Hum Genet. 2015;134:881‐893. doi: 10.1007/s00439-015-1567-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35. Guo D‐C, Pannu H, Tran‐Fadulu V, et al. Mutations in smooth muscle α‐actin (ACTA2) lead to thoracic aortic aneurysms and dissections. Nat Genet. 2007;39:1488‐1493. doi: 10.1038/ng.2007.6 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36. Amans MR, Stout C, Fox C, et al. Cerebral arteriopathy associated with Arg179His ACTA2 mutation. Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery. 2014;6:e46. doi: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2013-010997.rep [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37. Negishi K, Aizawa K, Shindo T, et al. An Myh11 single lysine deletion causes aortic dissection by reducing aortic structural integrity and contractility. Sci Rep. 2022;12:8844. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-12418-8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38. Gerasimavicius L, Livesey BJ, Marsh JA. Loss‐of‐function, gain‐of‐function and dominant‐negative mutations have profoundly different effects on protein structure. Nat Commun. 2022;13:3895. doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-31686-6 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39. Jeremy RW, Robertson E, Lu Y, Hambly BD. Perturbations of mechanotransduction and aneurysm formation in heritable aortopathies. Int J Cardiol. 2013;169:7‐16. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2013.08.056. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40. Kuang S‐Q, Kwartler CS, Byanova KL, et al. Rare, nonsynonymous variant in the smooth muscle‐specific isoform of myosin heavy chain, MYH11, R247C, alters force generation in the aorta and phenotype of smooth muscle cells. Circ Res. 2012;110:1411‐1422. doi: 10.1161/circresaha.111.261743 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41. Karimi A, Milewicz DM. Structure of the elastin‐contractile units in the thoracic aorta and how genes that cause thoracic aortic aneurysms and dissections disrupt this structure. Can J Cardiol. 2016;32:26‐34. doi: 10.1016/j.cjca.2015.11.004 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42. Slomp J, Gittenberger‐de Groot AC, Glukhova MA, et al. Differentiation, dedifferentiation, and apoptosis of smooth muscle cells during the development of the human ductus arteriosus. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 1997;17:1003‐1009. doi: 10.1161/01.atv.17.5.1003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43. Morano I, Chai GX, Baltas LG, et al. Smooth‐muscle contraction without smooth‐muscle myosin. Nat Cell Biol. 2000;2:371‐375. doi: 10.1038/35014065 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44. Jones JA, Spinale FG, Ikonomidis JS. Transforming growth factor‐β signaling in thoracic aortic aneurysm development: A paradox in pathogenesis. J Vasc Res. 2009;46:119‐137. doi: 10.1159/000151766 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45. Khan R, Sheppard R. Fibrosis in heart disease: understanding the role of transforming growth factor‐β1 in cardiomyopathy, valvular disease and arrhythmia. Immunology. 2006;118:10‐24. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2567.2006.02336.x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46. Pomianowski P, Elefteriades JA. The genetics and genomics of thoracic aortic disease. Ann Cardiothorac Surg. 2013;2:271. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47. Baumgartner H, de Backer J, Babu‐Narayan SV, et al. 2020 ESC guidelines for the management of adult congenital heart disease. Eur Heart J. 2021;42:563‐645. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehaa554 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48. Darrow JJ. Luxturna: FDA documents reveal the value of a costly gene therapy. Drug Discov Today. 2019;24:949‐954. doi: 10.1016/j.drudis.2019.01.019 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49. Hill L, Lulla P, Heslop HE. CAR‐T cell therapy for non‐Hodgkin lymphomas: A new treatment paradigm. Adv Cell Gene Ther. 2019;2:e54. doi: 10.1002/acg2.54 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50. Passini MA, Bu J, Roskelley EM, et al. CNS‐targeted gene therapy improves survival and motor function in a mouse model of spinal muscular atrophy. J Clin Invest. 2010;120:1253‐1264. doi: 10.1172/jci41615 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51. Finkel RS, Mercuri E, Darras BT, et al. Nusinersen versus sham control in infantile‐onset spinal muscular atrophy. N Engl J Med. 2017;377:1723‐1732. doi: 10.1056/nejmoa1702752 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52. Mercuri E, Darras BT, Chiriboga CA, et al. Nusinersen versus sham control in later‐onset spinal muscular atrophy. N Engl J Med. 2018;378:625‐635. doi: 10.1056/nejmoa1710504 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53. Goemans NM, Tulinius M, van den Akker JT, et al. Systemic administration of PRO051 in Duchenne's muscular dystrophy. N Engl J Med. 2011;364:1513‐1522. doi: 10.1056/nejmoa1011367 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54. Kim J, Hu C, Moufawad el Achkar C, et al. Patient‐customized oligonucleotide therapy for a rare genetic disease. N Engl J Med. 2019;381:1644‐1652. doi: 10.1056/nejmoa1813279 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55. Lu D, Thum T. RNA‐based diagnostic and therapeutic strategies for cardiovascular disease. Nat Rev Cardiol. 2019;16:661‐674. doi: 10.1038/s41569-019-0218-x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56. Winkle M, El‐Daly SM, Fabbri M, Calin GA. Noncoding RNA therapeutics — challenges and potential solutions. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2021;20:629‐651. doi: 10.1038/s41573-021-00219-z [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57. Zhao Y, Zhao G, Chang Z, et al. Generating endogenous Myh11‐driven Cre mice for sex‐independent gene deletion in smooth muscle cells. JCI Insight. 2023;8:e171661. doi: 10.1172/jci.insight.171661 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58. Arnaud P, Cadenet M, Mougin Z, et al. Early‐onset aortic dissection: characterization of a new pathogenic splicing variation in the MYH11 gene with several in‐frame abnormal transcripts. Hum Mutat. 2023;2023:1‐7. doi: 10.1155/2023/1410230 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59. Schulinga M. Muscle Cell and Tissue. InTech; 2015. [Google Scholar]
  • 60. Kwartler CS, Chen J, Thakur D, et al. Overexpression of smooth muscle myosin heavy chain leads to activation of the unfolded protein response and Autophagic turnover of thick filament‐associated proteins in vascular smooth muscle cells. J Biol Chem. 2014;289:14075‐14088. doi: 10.1074/jbc.m113.499277 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

Data sharing not applicable to this article as no datasets were generated or analysed during the current study.


Articles from European Journal of Clinical Investigation are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES