Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Biophysical Journal logoLink to Biophysical Journal
. 1998 Feb;74(2 Pt 1):1074–1085. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(98)74031-7

Two-dimensional tracking of ncd motility by back focal plane interferometry.

M W Allersma 1, F Gittes 1, M J deCastro 1, R J Stewart 1, C F Schmidt 1
PMCID: PMC1302587  PMID: 9533719

Abstract

A technique for detecting the displacement of micron-sized optically trapped probes using far-field interference is introduced, theoretically explained, and used to study the motility of the ncd motor protein. Bead motions in the focal plane relative to the optical trap were detected by measuring laser intensity shifts in the back-focal plane of the microscope condenser by projection on a quadrant diode. This detection method is two-dimensional, largely independent of the position of the trap in the field of view and has approximately 10-micros time resolution. The high resolution makes it possible to apply spectral analysis to measure dynamic parameters such as local viscosity and attachment compliance. A simple quantitative theory for back-focal-plane detection was derived that shows that the laser intensity shifts are caused primarily by a far-field interference effect. The theory predicts the detector response to bead displacement, without adjustable parameters, with good accuracy. To demonstrate the potential of the method, the ATP-dependent motility of ncd, a kinesin-related motor protein, was observed with an in vitro bead assay. A fusion protein consisting of truncated ncd (amino acids 195-685) fused with glutathione-S-transferase was adsorbed to silica beads, and the axial and lateral motions of the beads along the microtubule surface were observed with high spatial and temporal resolution. The average axial velocity of the ncd-coated beads was 230 +/- 30 nm/s (average +/- SD). Spectral analysis of bead motion showed the increase in viscous drag near the surface; we also found that any elastic constraints of the moving motors are much smaller than the constraints due to binding in the presence of the nonhydrolyzable nucleotide adenylylimidodiphosphate.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (217.7 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Allen R. D., David G. B., Nomarski G. The zeiss-Nomarski differential interference equipment for transmitted-light microscopy. Z Wiss Mikrosk. 1969 Nov;69(4):193–221. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Ashkin A. Forces of a single-beam gradient laser trap on a dielectric sphere in the ray optics regime. Biophys J. 1992 Feb;61(2):569–582. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(92)81860-X. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Axelrod D. Fluorescence polarization microscopy. Methods Cell Biol. 1989;30:333–352. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Berliner E., Young E. C., Anderson K., Mahtani H. K., Gelles J. Failure of a single-headed kinesin to track parallel to microtubule protofilaments. Nature. 1995 Feb 23;373(6516):718–721. doi: 10.1038/373718a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Block S. M., Goldstein L. S., Schnapp B. J. Bead movement by single kinesin molecules studied with optical tweezers. Nature. 1990 Nov 22;348(6299):348–352. doi: 10.1038/348348a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Brady S. T. A novel brain ATPase with properties expected for the fast axonal transport motor. Nature. 1985 Sep 5;317(6032):73–75. doi: 10.1038/317073a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Case R. B., Pierce D. W., Hom-Booher N., Hart C. L., Vale R. D. The directional preference of kinesin motors is specified by an element outside of the motor catalytic domain. Cell. 1997 Sep 5;90(5):959–966. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)80360-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Chandra R., Salmon E. D., Erickson H. P., Lockhart A., Endow S. A. Structural and functional domains of the Drosophila ncd microtubule motor protein. J Biol Chem. 1993 Apr 25;268(12):9005–9013. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Coppin C. M., Finer J. T., Spudich J. A., Vale R. D. Detection of sub-8-nm movements of kinesin by high-resolution optical-trap microscopy. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1996 Mar 5;93(5):1913–1917. doi: 10.1073/pnas.93.5.1913. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Endow S. A., Henikoff S., Soler-Niedziela L. Mediation of meiotic and early mitotic chromosome segregation in Drosophila by a protein related to kinesin. Nature. 1990 May 3;345(6270):81–83. doi: 10.1038/345081a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Endow S. A., Kang S. J., Satterwhite L. L., Rose M. D., Skeen V. P., Salmon E. D. Yeast Kar3 is a minus-end microtubule motor protein that destabilizes microtubules preferentially at the minus ends. EMBO J. 1994 Jun 1;13(11):2708–2713. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1994.tb06561.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Finer J. T., Simmons R. M., Spudich J. A. Single myosin molecule mechanics: piconewton forces and nanometre steps. Nature. 1994 Mar 10;368(6467):113–119. doi: 10.1038/368113a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Gelles J., Schnapp B. J., Sheetz M. P. Tracking kinesin-driven movements with nanometre-scale precision. Nature. 1988 Feb 4;331(6155):450–453. doi: 10.1038/331450a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Gittes F., Meyhöfer E., Baek S., Howard J. Directional loading of the kinesin motor molecule as it buckles a microtubule. Biophys J. 1996 Jan;70(1):418–429. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(96)79585-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Gittes F., Schmidt C. F. Signals and noise in micromechanical measurements. Methods Cell Biol. 1998;55:129–156. doi: 10.1016/s0091-679x(08)60406-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Henningsen U., Schliwa M. Reversal in the direction of movement of a molecular motor. Nature. 1997 Sep 4;389(6646):93–96. doi: 10.1038/38022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Higuchi H., Muto E., Inoue Y., Yanagida T. Kinetics of force generation by single kinesin molecules activated by laser photolysis of caged ATP. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1997 Apr 29;94(9):4395–4400. doi: 10.1073/pnas.94.9.4395. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Howard J., Hudspeth A. J., Vale R. D. Movement of microtubules by single kinesin molecules. Nature. 1989 Nov 9;342(6246):154–158. doi: 10.1038/342154a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Ishijima A., Kojima H., Higuchi H., Harada Y., Funatsu T., Yanagida T. Multiple- and single-molecule analysis of the actomyosin motor by nanometer-piconewton manipulation with a microneedle: unitary steps and forces. Biophys J. 1996 Jan;70(1):383–400. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(96)79582-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Kull F. J., Sablin E. P., Lau R., Fletterick R. J., Vale R. D. Crystal structure of the kinesin motor domain reveals a structural similarity to myosin. Nature. 1996 Apr 11;380(6574):550–555. doi: 10.1038/380550a0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Kuriyama R., Kofron M., Essner R., Kato T., Dragas-Granoic S., Omoto C. K., Khodjakov A. Characterization of a minus end-directed kinesin-like motor protein from cultured mammalian cells. J Cell Biol. 1995 May;129(4):1049–1059. doi: 10.1083/jcb.129.4.1049. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. McDonald H. B., Goldstein L. S. Identification and characterization of a gene encoding a kinesin-like protein in Drosophila. Cell. 1990 Jun 15;61(6):991–1000. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(90)90064-l. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Meyhöfer E., Howard J. The force generated by a single kinesin molecule against an elastic load. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1995 Jan 17;92(2):574–578. doi: 10.1073/pnas.92.2.574. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Moore J. D., Endow S. A. Kinesin proteins: a phylum of motors for microtubule-based motility. Bioessays. 1996 Mar;18(3):207–219. doi: 10.1002/bies.950180308. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Ray S., Meyhöfer E., Milligan R. A., Howard J. Kinesin follows the microtubule's protofilament axis. J Cell Biol. 1993 Jun;121(5):1083–1093. doi: 10.1083/jcb.121.5.1083. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Sablin E. P., Kull F. J., Cooke R., Vale R. D., Fletterick R. J. Crystal structure of the motor domain of the kinesin-related motor ncd. Nature. 1996 Apr 11;380(6574):555–559. doi: 10.1038/380555a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Simmons R. M., Finer J. T., Chu S., Spudich J. A. Quantitative measurements of force and displacement using an optical trap. Biophys J. 1996 Apr;70(4):1813–1822. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(96)79746-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Smith S. B., Cui Y., Bustamante C. Overstretching B-DNA: the elastic response of individual double-stranded and single-stranded DNA molecules. Science. 1996 Feb 9;271(5250):795–799. doi: 10.1126/science.271.5250.795. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Stewart R. J., Thaler J. P., Goldstein L. S. Direction of microtubule movement is an intrinsic property of the motor domains of kinesin heavy chain and Drosophila ncd protein. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1993 Jun 1;90(11):5209–5213. doi: 10.1073/pnas.90.11.5209. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Svoboda K., Block S. M. Biological applications of optical forces. Annu Rev Biophys Biomol Struct. 1994;23:247–285. doi: 10.1146/annurev.bb.23.060194.001335. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Svoboda K., Block S. M. Force and velocity measured for single kinesin molecules. Cell. 1994 Jun 3;77(5):773–784. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(94)90060-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Svoboda K., Schmidt C. F., Schnapp B. J., Block S. M. Direct observation of kinesin stepping by optical trapping interferometry. Nature. 1993 Oct 21;365(6448):721–727. doi: 10.1038/365721a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Vale R. D., Funatsu T., Pierce D. W., Romberg L., Harada Y., Yanagida T. Direct observation of single kinesin molecules moving along microtubules. Nature. 1996 Apr 4;380(6573):451–453. doi: 10.1038/380451a0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Vale R. D., Reese T. S., Sheetz M. P. Identification of a novel force-generating protein, kinesin, involved in microtubule-based motility. Cell. 1985 Aug;42(1):39–50. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(85)80099-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. VanBuren P., Work S. S., Warshaw D. M. Enhanced force generation by smooth muscle myosin in vitro. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1994 Jan 4;91(1):202–205. doi: 10.1073/pnas.91.1.202. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Walker R. A., Salmon E. D., Endow S. A. The Drosophila claret segregation protein is a minus-end directed motor molecule. Nature. 1990 Oct 25;347(6295):780–782. doi: 10.1038/347780a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Wang M. D., Yin H., Landick R., Gelles J., Block S. M. Stretching DNA with optical tweezers. Biophys J. 1997 Mar;72(3):1335–1346. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(97)78780-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Wang Z., Khan S., Sheetz M. P. Single cytoplasmic dynein molecule movements: characterization and comparison with kinesin. Biophys J. 1995 Nov;69(5):2011–2023. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(95)80071-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Williams R. C., Jr, Lee J. C. Preparation of tubulin from brain. Methods Enzymol. 1982;85(Pt B):376–385. doi: 10.1016/0076-6879(82)85038-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Yin H., Wang M. D., Svoboda K., Landick R., Block S. M., Gelles J. Transcription against an applied force. Science. 1995 Dec 8;270(5242):1653–1657. doi: 10.1126/science.270.5242.1653. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Biophysical Journal are provided here courtesy of The Biophysical Society

RESOURCES