Skip to main content
European Heart Journal. Digital Health logoLink to European Heart Journal. Digital Health
. 2026 Mar 10;7(3):ztag045. doi: 10.1093/ehjdh/ztag045

Personalized cardiovascular risk management for outdoor activities: a digital health application

Marco Vecchiato 1,2,3,✉,2, Nicola Borasio 4,5, Sandro Savino 6
PMCID: PMC13026413  PMID: 41908986

Abstract

Hiking is a widely practiced outdoor activity with well-known cardiovascular and mental health benefits. However, its popularity among individuals with chronic conditions and across varying fitness levels raises safety concerns, especially in mountainous environments. Current trail planning tools typically rely on generic metrics, without considering individual cardiovascular risk or functional capacity. To address this gap, a novel digital system named MOVE was developed. Based on a patented algorithm, MOVE integrates user-specific characteristics, such as age, sex, body mass index, physical activity level, cardiovascular risk factors, and chronic conditions, with trail features, such as slope, elevation, and altitude. The system provides estimated cardiorespiratory fitness (eCRF), classifies cardiovascular risk according to ESC guidelines, and generates personalized predictions of hiking time, energy expenditure, heart rate ranges, and relative effort.

Following its public release in late 2024, the app was widely adopted in spring–summer 2025, with over 3000 hikes recorded. Users included individuals with a wide range of eCRF and cardiovascular risk profiles, highlighting MOVE’s potential for real-world applicability. The app was particularly used in collaboration with Alpine tourist regions, supported by trail signage and QR codes. Nearly one-third of hikes were classified as high-effort, mainly in individuals with lower eCRF or greater trail demands.

MOVE represents a promising step towards personalized outdoor physical activity. Future developments include real-time tracking, adaptive feedback, wearable integration, and AI-driven modelling. This approach may enhance safety and accessibility of hiking, particularly for at-risk populations, supporting public health through safe engagement with nature-based exercise.

Keywords: Hiking safety, Tourism, Wearable devices

Graphical Abstract

Graphical Abstract.

For image description, please refer to the figure legend and surrounding text.

Overview of the MOVE algorithm structure and functioning

This figure illustrates the conceptual framework of the MOVE algorithm:
  • User data (left panel): The application collects user-specific information, including mandatory and optional parameters, to estimate cardiovascular risk using the SCORE2/SCORE2-OP algorithms and to estimate cardiorespiratory fitness through validated equations. These values are then used to define individualized exercise thresholds according to the user’s estimated cardiovascular risk profile.
  • Trail characteristics (right panel): Hiking paths are reconstructed from 3D GPX-derived maps and represented in two dimensions. The trail is segmented into multiple short fractions with known length and slope. For each segment, local slope, altitude, and carried load (e.g. backpack weight) are integrated to calculate the overall hiking effort and energy cost.
  • App outputs (bottom panel): Based on user data and trail-specific parameters, MOVE provides four individualized predicted main outputs: hiking time, physical effort, energy expenditure, and safety recommendations according to cardiovascular risk and chronic diseases.

Introduction

Hiking is an increasingly popular outdoor recreational activity, especially during the summer season, with increasing accessibility due to available technical equipment and infrastructures. Outdoor activities are now practiced by a broad population, including individuals with chronic conditions or those seeking outdoor activities for their physical and mental well-being. Benefits include improved functional capacity, also affecting cardiorespiratory fitness, coordination, and reducing stress levels.

However, outdoor activities inherently carry risks. Following the COVID-19 pandemic, there has been a substantial rise in nature-based tourism all around the world with a parallel increase in accidents, primarily due to limited awareness of environment-specific risks.1 While climbing or alpine mountaineering could be expected as high-risk sports, hiking ranks first among outdoor activities requiring rescue operations, accounting for about 50% of all mountain rescue calls.2 The most frequent causes include falls, slips, fatigue, and acute medical events, often due to an underestimation of the required effort or inappropriate planning and trail selection. Notably, sudden cardiac death remains the leading cause of death among men over 34 years of age during mountain excursions.3

Although traditional hiking signage and online platforms provide useful data on trail length, altitude, elevation profile, and technical difficulty, they generally do not consider individual pathophysiological characteristics and lifestyle. Hiking times are typically estimated based on average users, with no personalized adjustment for physical activity and fitness level, health status, or cardiovascular risk profile. Despite the availability of national and international standards for trail classification (e.g. Swiss and Italian Alpine associations), most hikers must still rely on generic information. Moreover, such route signage typically estimates that an average person gains about 350 m per hour of ascent and 500 m per hour of descent, also considering changes in altitude. These values are helpful but fail to account for the high inter-individual variability regarding cardiorespiratory fitness, exercise tolerance, and relative cardiovascular demand.

MOVE: a novel digital tool for risk-stratified and fitness-based hiking guidance

In recent years, the fitness and digital health sectors have increasingly incorporated individual physiological and cardiovascular data into physical activity and exercise planning. Numerous commercial applications and devices now provide training recommendations tailored to parameters, such as age, heart rate, or estimated cardiorespiratory fitness (eCRF) reflecting a broader trend towards data-driven personalization in physical activity and sports.4 This approach appears particularly relevant for outdoor activities such as hiking, when considering the heterogeneous fitness levels and clinical conditions for a potentially demanding cardiorespiratory effort in an uncontrolled mountain environment. Nonetheless, most route-planning tools currently available on the market for outdoor use, continue to rely on generic metrics, without accounting for individual health status or cardiovascular risk.5

To address this implementation gap and to promote the health benefits for outdoor physical activities in natural environments, a patented algorithm has been developed integrating user-specific characteristics, such as age, sex, body mass index (BMI), physical activity level, cardiovascular risk factors, and possible chronic conditions, into the planning of hiking itineraries (Graphical Abstract). The system employs scientifically validated equations to estimate eCRF and uses cardiovascular risk classification according to the most recent ESC guidelines.6,7 The algorithm dynamically selects the most appropriate eCRF equation according to the individual user profile (age, sex, BMI, and physical activity level), based on reported performance metrics of validated models. eCRF is used exclusively for relative effort stratification and preventive guidance, and not for clinical fitness diagnosis or performance prescription. Based on these outputs, the system defines a recommended physical effort threshold, expressed as a percentage of eCRF, in accordance with the ESC guidelines on physical activity and cardiovascular disease prevention.8

This digital model has been implemented in a prototype application, called MOVE (publicly available as MOVE – hike and bike), which analyses trail features such as altitude, elevation change and slope in association with the user profile to provide personalized estimates of recommended hiking time, energy expenditure, heart rate intensity ranges, and relative physical effort.9 These outputs support informed trail selection based on an individual’s functional capacity and risk profile.5

Besides providing specific qualitative recommendations for different pathologies, the algorithm also considers other real-world variables such as load carriage and altitude to refine eCRF estimates and effort prediction. Carrying a backpack increases oxygen consumption, thus significantly affecting aerobic capacity with an impact of about ∼20% per 10% additional load relative to body weight. The algorithm takes this information and adjusts the outputs based on backpack weight. Similarly, altitude exposure reduces aerobic capacity by ∼1% per 100 m above 1500 m; thus, an approximately 20% reduction is expected at 3500 m. These adjustments aim to provide more realistic and tailored estimates aligned with the physiological demands of hiking.10

Real-world implementation: participant characteristics and trail data

Since its public release on online platforms in autumn 2024, MOVE has been broadly adopted, particularly during the spring-summer 2025 season, following partnerships with selected Italian Alpine tourist regions. Dedicated trail signage was installed, including vertical QR codes linking to the app interface. Between April and September 2025, 3004 hiking records were collected through the app, providing insight into its practical application and user demographics (Table 1).

Table 1.

Demographic and clinical characteristics of MOVE app users and selected hiking trail features

Variables All Women Men
n = 3004 n = 832 n = 2172
Age Years Mean SD Mean SD Mean SD
48.17 14.64 44.60 12.15 49.54 15.27
n % n % n %
< 40 884 29 283 34 601 28
40 -55 889 30 337 41 552 25
55–70 1058 35 209 25 849 39
> 70 173 6 3 0 170 8
BMI kg/m2 Mean SD Mean SD Mean SD
23.98 3.29 23.01 3.78 24.35 3.01
n % n % n %
Underweight 47 2 41 5 6 0.3
Normal weight 2057 68 610 73 1447 67
Overweight 752 25 132 16 620 29
Obesity 148 5 49 6 99 4
eCRF mL/kg/min Mean SD Mean SD Mean SD
37.13 8.13 32.83 7.49 39.07 7.65
Blood Pressure n % n % n %
Normal 1871 62 567 68 1304 60
On target with therapy 605 20 97 12 508 23
Elevated despite therapy 11 0.4 0 0.0 11 1
Elevated 89 3 2 0.2 87 4
Not known 428 14 166 20 262 12
Cholesterol Normal 1778 59 500 60 1278 59
On target with therapy 277 9 63 8 214 10
Elevated despite therapy 19 1 12 1 7 0.3
Elevated 299 10 10 1 289 13
Not known 631 21 247 30 384 18
Smoking Yes 428 14 51 6 377 17
No 2419 81 719 86 1700 78
Not declared 157 5 62 7 95 4
CV risk score Low-moderate risk 967 32 296 36 671 31
High risk 324 11 83 10 241 11
Very high 184 6 49 6 135 6
<40 y with high risk 15 0.5 0 0 15 1
Not applicable 1514 50 404 49 1110 51
Physical activity
level
Sedentary 1065 35 292 35 773 36
< 150 min/week 805 27 172 21 633 29
150–300 min/week 544 18 175 21 369 17
> 300 min/week 590 20 193 23 397 18
Diseases Not declared 490 16 35 4 455 21
No 2227 74 710 85 1517 70
Musculoskeletal 49 2 21 3 28 1
Asthma 79 3 38 5 41 2
Diabetes 67 2 1 0.1 66 3
Heart diseases a 79 3 29 3 50 2
Kidney 10 0.3 1 0.1 9 0.4
Neurological 7 0.2 2 0.2 5 0.2
Pulmonary
(not asthma)
7 0.2 1 0.1 6 0.3
Transplant 2 0.1 1 0.1 1 0.0
Trail Characteristic Mean SD Mean SD Mean SD
Length (m) 10008 7972 9483 6690 10205 8394
Elevation Gain (m) 804 609 699 536 844 630
n % n % n %
Trail Technical Difficulty T—Tourist 740 25 282 34 458 21
E—Hiking 1712 57 394 47 1318 61
EE—Expert Hiking 552 18 156 19 396 18
Predicted physical effort Low 1434 48 450 54 984 45
Medium 625 21 210 25 415 19
High 945 31 172 21 773 36

BMI, body mass index; BP, blood pressure; eCRF, estimated cardiorespiratory fitness; HR, heart rate; MET, metabolic equivalent of task; E, Hiking (Escursionistico—CAI classification); EE, Expert Hiking (Escursionisti Esperti—CAI classification).

aHeart diseases do not include arterial hypertension.

The cohort included 2172 men and 832 women, with a mean age of 48.17 ± 14.64 years. Most users were aged between 40 and 70 years (65%) and had a normal BMI (23.98 ± 3.29 kg/m2). Based on self-reported values and SCORE2/SCORE2-OP classifications, the cardiovascular risk profile included 967 individuals at low-to-moderate risk (32%), 324 at high risk (11%), and 184 at very high risk (6%), while 15 users <40 years old showed high risk based on medical history.

The mean eCRF was 37.1 ± 8.1 mL/kg/min, with significantly lower values in women. Blood pressure and cholesterol levels were reported as normal or well controlled in over 70% of participants, though 14% and 21% of users were unaware of their respective values. Notably, 14% were active smokers.

The most common trails selected had a mean length of ∼10 km and an average elevation gain of ∼800 m, with technical classifications of E (Hiking, 57%) and EE (Expert Hiking, 18%) being the most represented. Despite a wide range of physical fitness and clinical status, 31% of the hikes were classified by the algorithm as high effort, particularly among those with lower eCRF and/or greater elevation gain.

Limitations and future directions

This study does not report clinical outcomes such as adverse cardiovascular events or demonstrated safety improvements. The analysis is descriptive and exploratory, focusing on feasibility, implementation, and real-world usage patterns. Prospective studies evaluating clinical outcomes and safety endpoints are planned.

A key limitation of the current dataset is the reliance on self-reported health and lifestyle data, including blood pressure, cholesterol levels, and physical activity habits. As expected in a non-clinical, population-based setting, a substantial proportion of users were unable to report exact values for these parameters. To mitigate this issue, health variables were collected using predefined categories rather than continuous values, and missing information was explicitly classified as ‘unknown’. In cases where cardiovascular risk could not be calculated using risk charts due to incomplete data, a conservative risk classification strategy was adopted, assigning the highest plausible risk category based on the available information in order to avoid risk underestimation. This precautionary approach prioritizes user safety but may lead to overestimation of cardiovascular risk in some individuals.

Although directly measured CRF values are not available in the MOVE real-world dataset, we previously conducted controlled laboratory and field-based physiological testing using CPET and portable breath-by-breath gas analysis during hiking to objectively characterize the cardiorespiratory demands of hiking and the inter-individual variability in relative exercise intensity.11 These findings support the physiological rationale underlying MOVE’s effort modelling approach. Dedicated studies directly comparing eCRF and directly measured CRF values are planned as part of future research.

The current application processes the GPX file of the selected route, considering the associated user parameters and provides an overall trail-level assessment. However, future developments will offer more precise analyses, through segment-based breakdowns of trails and real-time tracking of the user position and speed, with adaptive recommendations and timely feedback along the trail.

Processing current and past tracking data of a single user with machine learning algorithms will allow better predictions of the user’s fitness level and expected performance; on the other hand, multi user data will be used to detect and offset errors in the route (e.g. accounting for a constant or seasonal bias due to the terrain type) to improve the algorithm outputs. Integration with wearable devices is expected to further improve the accuracy of the system due to live monitoring and processing of physiological data such as step cadence, heart rate, ventilation or oxygen saturation. In this evolving digital health landscape, applications designed for outdoor activities should move towards evidence-based personalization, particularly for populations at increased cardiovascular risk. The incorporation of artificial intelligence could further enhance these systems, enabling methods for user profiling, real-time data analysis, predictive modelling, and tailored feedback based on user trends and biometric feedback loops.

On the other hand, the growing presence of digital platforms, outdoor-specific social media and route-sharing websites has increased visibility and accessibility to mountain tourism, without adjusting for the related risks with specific target initiatives. Non-personalized recommendations may inadvertently promote overexertion or unsafe behaviour, particularly among less experienced or higher-risk individuals. The potential for these platforms to support individualized planning based on fitness and risk profiling represents a valuable direction and opportunity for public health initiatives and health tourism by promoting safe and salutary physical activity in nature mountain environment.

Conclusions

While outdoor activities like hiking offer significant cardiovascular and psychological benefits, they must be approached with a greater degree of individualized planning, especially as participation expands across age and risk spectrums. Digital health tools integrating cardiovascular risk assessment, pathophysiological profiling, physical activity, and fitness evaluations as well as hiking trail analysis may serve as valuable allies in this effort. A patented algorithm currently implemented in an early-phase digital application suggests the feasibility and first promising outcomes of this approach. In the near future, the incorporation of artificial intelligence and wearable technology may further support hikers in making informed, health-conscious and thus safe decisions before and during such outdoor activities.

Ethical considerations

No identifiable personal data were collected through the MOVE - hike and bike application. All data analysed in this study were fully anonymized and aggregated. According to European data protection regulations, the analysis of fully anonymized data does not involve the processing of personal data. Therefore, in accordance with institutional policies, this study did not require formal ethics committee approval.

Acknowledgements

We thank the Monade srl team and illustrator Fabiola Allegrone for creating the hiker illustration used in the figure. The authors thank Prof. Daniel Neunhaeuserer and Prof. Andrea Ermolao for their valuable supervision and collaboration throughout the development of the MOVE project.

Contributor Information

Marco Vecchiato, Sports and Exercise Medicine Division, Department of Medicine, University of Padova, Via Giustiniani 2, Padova 35128, Italy; Sports Medicine and Cardiovascular Rehabilitation Unit, Noale Hospital, Venezia 30033, Italy; Department of Theoretical and Applied Sciences, eCampus University, Novedrate, Como 22060, Italy.

Nicola Borasio, Sports and Exercise Medicine Division, Department of Medicine, University of Padova, Via Giustiniani 2, Padova 35128, Italy; Institute of Mountain Emergency Medicine, EURAC Research, Viale Druso 1, Bolzano 39100, Italy.

Sandro Savino, Department of Medicine, University of Padova, Via Giustiniani 2, Padova 35128, Italy.

Author contribution

Marco Vecchiato (Conceptualization, Methodology, Project administration, Supervision, Visualization, Writing—original draft [lead], Data curation, Formal analysis, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Writing—review & editing [equal]), Nicola Borasio (Data curation, Formal analysis, Writing—review & editing [equal], Investigation, Methodology, Writing—original draft [supporting]), and Sandro Savino (Conceptualization, Formal analysis, Writing—review & editing [supporting], Software, Validation [lead])

Funding

The front-end section of the mobile application was created by Monade srl team and supported through a Kick-Start Activity grant from the European Space Agency (ESA), awarded under the ‘Inclusive and Accessible Sport’ thematic call (ESA Contract No. 4000142026/22/NL/AF/jxh). The funded ‘MOVE in SPACE’ was a project derived from the original MOVE initiative, with an enhanced focus on GPS functionalities and accessibility. These Kick-Start Activities are part of ESA’s programme to support feasibility studies exploring innovative services using space technologies.

References

  • 1. Van Veelen  MJ, Voegele  A, Rauch  S, Kaufmann  M, Brugger  H, Strapazzon  G.  COVID-19 pandemic in mountainous areas: impact, mitigation strategies, and new technologies in search and rescue operations. High Alt Med Biol  2021;22:335–341. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Ciesa  M, Grigolato  S, Cavalli  R. Retrospective study on search and rescue operations in two prealps areas of Italy. Wilderness Environ Med  2015;26:150–158. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Burtscher  M. Risk of cardiovascular events during mountain activities. Adv Exp Med Biol  2007;618:1–11. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Javed  A, Kim  DS, Hershman  SG, Shcherbina  A, Johnson  A, Tolas  A, et al.  Personalized digital behaviour interventions increase short-term physical activity: a randomized control crossover trial substudy of the MyHeart counts cardiovascular health study. Eur Heart J Digit Health  2023;4:411–419. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Vecchiato  M, Borasio  N, Scettri  E, Franzoi  V, Duregon  F, Savino  S, et al.  Are suggested hiking times accurate? A validation of hiking time estimations for preventive measures in mountains. Medicina (Lithuania)  2025;61:115. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Visseren  F, Mach  F, Smulders  YM, Carballo  D, Koskinas  KC, Bäck  M, et al.  2021 ESC guidelines on cardiovascular disease prevention in clinical practice. Eur Heart J  2021;42:3227–3337. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Peterman  JE, Harber  MP, Imboden  MT, Whaley  MH, Fleenor  BS, Myers  J, et al.  Accuracy of exercise-based equations for estimating cardiorespiratory fitness. Med Sci Sports Exerc  2021;53:74–82. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Pelliccia  A, Sharma  S, Gati  S, Bäck  M, Börjesson  M, Caselli  S, et al.  2020 ESC guidelines on sports cardiology and exercise in patients with cardiovascular disease. Eur Heart J  2021;42:17–96. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Faggian  S, Centanini  A, Quinto  G, Vecchiato  M, Ermolao  A, Battista  F, et al.  The many faces of exercise intensity: a call to agree on definitions and provide standardized prescriptions. Eur J Prev Cardiol  2024;31:e89–e91. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Burtscher  M. Exercise capacity for mountaineering: how much is necessary?  Res Sports Med  2004;12:241–250. [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Vecchiato  M, Borasio  N, Scettri  E, Cangialosi  D, Palermi  S, Savino  S, et al.  Are hiking recommendations one-size-fits-all? Insights into cardiovascular safety and trail demands. Br Med Bull  2025;156:ldaf019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from European Heart Journal. Digital Health are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology

RESOURCES