The aim of this Special Issue is to emphasize the significance of molecular-scale design, synthesis, and application of macro-, meso-, and microporous materials in order to achieve optimal performance across diverse fields. These materials are commonly classified according to their pore diameters. Based on the criteria established by the IUPAC, microporous materials possess pore diameters smaller than 2 nm, mesoporous materials range from 2 to 50 nm, and macroporous materials exhibit diameters larger than 50 nm [1]. It is well known that porous materials have numerous current and emerging applications in various areas. They are widely used for gas separation and storage, liquid phase adsorption and catalysis in the fields of food processing, biotechnology, pharmaceuticals, petrochemicals, water remediation, etc. In addition, they are also employed in production and energy storage. When their development is controlled at the molecular level, it becomes possible to tailor their internal structure and introduce specific chemical functionalization, thereby optimizing performance for targeted applications. Recent research in this area focused on the use of in situ techniques and modeling to further understand the dependence of the functional properties on the molecular assembly and pore formation. The fundamental mechanisms at the molecular level, directing self-assembly and pore evolution under varying conditions, especially for hierarchical and hybrid systems, are still not fully understood. In this sense, multidisciplinary characterization such as real-time microscopy combined with in situ structural and spectroscopic techniques offer a deeper insight than before into the mechanisms of pore formation and structure–property relationships. Furthermore, molecular simulations are necessary for accelerating the development of tailored porous materials. In this respect, integrated computational–experimental protocols and machine learning can predict porous architectures prior to synthesis. However, these types of studies are still limited [2]. In addition, advanced design and novel synthesis strategies are necessary in order to develop hierarchical and multiscale pore structures with improved mass transport and multifunctionality within a single architecture [3,4]. Low yields, template removal, use of hazardous solvents, or synthesis routes that require high energy consumption currently limit the production of materials with promising applications. For these reasons, it is important to develop scalable and environmentally friendly synthesis routes at low temperatures, in which templates are biodegradable or recyclable. Template-directed assembly and bottom-up techniques allow a precise control of pore sizes and distributions. In addition, chemical etching [5] and micelle-based assembly [6] are tools for shaping the pore structures during synthesis. These processes can generate hierarchical porosity and dynamic self-healing porous networks that keep structural integrity, minimizing or eliminating solvent use [7,8]. Those novel routes will allow the preparation of controlled pore architectures, achieving atomic-level control over pore geometry, connectivity, and surface functionality while maintaining scalability and structural robustness. Advances in inverse design strategies will enable researchers to tailor pore size distributions, surface chemistry, and hierarchical architectures for a specific field such as selective catalysis, gas separation, energy storage, and molecular sensing. Different types of porous materials in diverse application fields are currently receiving special attention ([9], and references there in), such as functionalized mesoporous silica nanoparticles [10,11], metal–organic frameworks (MOFs) [12,13], porous organic polymers [14], covalent organic frameworks (COFs) [15], carbon-based materials [16,17,18,19,20], etc., and in future they will be studied more. Functional integration is also an important issue. Embedding catalytic, photonic, electronic or magnetic properties directly into porous scaffolds is a strategy that will continue to be optimized in the future [21,22]. Overall, molecular control of porosity will enable the development of more selective, efficient, and sustainable materials, fostering technological progress in these areas, especially for energy storage and conversion, advanced separation, catalysis under real conditions, health care, etc. This Special Issue presents representative studies illustrating these advances, including a molecular dynamics simulation investigation connecting atomistic modeling with membrane performance in practical applications.
Conclusively, the future of the research of macro-, meso- and microporous materials will be determined by data-driven design, precisely controlled synthesis combined with in situ reaction monitoring and advanced characterization techniques, and resource- and energy-efficient green manufacturing.
Conflicts of Interest
The author declares no conflict of interest.
Footnotes
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
References
- 1.Sing K.S.W., Everett D.H., Haul R.A.W., Moscou L., Pierotti R.A., Rouquerol J., Siemieniewska T. Reporting Physisorption Data for Gas/Solid Systems with Special Reference to the Determination of Surface Area and Porosity (Recommendations 1984) Pure Appl. Chem. 1985;57:603–619. doi: 10.1351/pac198557040603. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Liu T., Liu G. Porous Organic Materials Offer Vast Future Opportunities. Nat. Comm. 2020;11:4984. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-15911-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Innocenzi P., Malfati L. Mesoporous Ordered Titania Films: An Advanced Platform for Photocatalysis. J. Photochem. Photobiol. C Photochem. Rev. 2024;58:100646. doi: 10.1016/j.jphotochemrev.2023.100646. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Innocenzi P. Mesoporous Ordered Films via Self-Assembly: Trends and Perspectives. Chem. Sci. 2022;13:13264–13279. doi: 10.1039/D2SC04828K. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Liu Z., Lv H., Xu Y. Etching Strategies Induced Multihierarchical Structures of MOFs and their Derivatives for Gas Sensing Applications: A Review. J. Mater. Chem. C. 2025;13:3653. doi: 10.1039/D4TC05012F. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Nagaraj K. State-of-the-art Surfactant-based Coatings for Biomaterials: Innovations, Applications, and Future Prospects in Biomedical Engineering. Intern. J. Pharmac. 2025;681:125879. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2025.125879. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Hayashi T., Shimojima A. Self-healing Materials Based on Dynamic Properties of Siloxane Networks. J. Sol-Gel Sci. Technol. 2025;116:1995–2009. doi: 10.1007/s10971-025-06731-7. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Wang X., Zhang S., Chen Y. Polyimine-Based Self-Healing Composites: A Review on Dynamic Covalent Thermosets for Sustainable and High-Performance Applications. Polymers. 2025;17:1607. doi: 10.3390/polym17121607. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Colomer M.T. Special Issue “Design, Synthesis and Applications of Macroporous, Mesoporous and Microporous Materials”. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2024;25:7127. doi: 10.3390/ijms25137127. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Zhou J., Liu C., Zhong Y., Luo Z., Wu L.A. Review of Current Developments in Functionalized Mesoporous Silica Nanoparticles: From Synthesis to Biosensing Applications. Biosensors. 2024;14:575. doi: 10.3390/bios14120575. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Liu Y., Zhao M., Zhang M., Yang B., Qi Y.-K., Fu Q. Mesoporous Silica Nanoparticle-based Nanomedicine: Preparation, Functional Modification, and Theranostic Applications. Mat. Today Bio. 2025;34:102223. doi: 10.1016/j.mtbio.2025.102223. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Han Z., Yang Y., Rushlow J., Huo J., Liu Z., Hsu Y., Yin R., Wang M., Liang R., Wang K., et al. Development of the Design and Synthesis of Metal–Organic Frameworks (MOFs): From Large-Scale Attempts, Functional Oriented Modifications, to Artificial Intelligence (AI) Predictions. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2025;54:367–395. doi: 10.1039/D4CS00432A. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Kumar S., Kesavan J., Fu Y.-P. Recent Advancements in Metal–Organic Frameworks (MOFs) for Flexible Supercapacitors Aimed at Wearable Technology. J. Mater. Chem. A. 2025;13:19236. doi: 10.1039/d5ta01159k. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Yang L., Shao L., Wu Z., Zhan P., Zhang L. Design and Synthesis of Porous Organic Polymers: Promising Catalysts for Lignocellulose Conversion to 5-Hydroxymethylfurfural and Derivates. Polymers. 2023;15:2630. doi: 10.3390/polym15122630. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Husain A., Gunnasegaran P., Danish M., Lee D.-E., Ho W.-K. Next-generation Fuel Cell Technologies Empowered by Covalent Organic Frameworks-Based Materials: A Review on Emerging Potential of COFs for Functional Membranes and Catalytic Advancements. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2026;555:217669. doi: 10.1016/j.ccr.2026.217669. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Pan J., Zhong W., Gao Z., Yang X., Zhang Y., Guan Y., Yan X. N, S-Doped Silicon Oxycarbide-Drived Carbon/Amorphous Ball-Flower-Like NiO as High Performance Electrode in Asymmetric Supercapacitors. Ceram. Intern. 2021;47:27833–27842. doi: 10.1016/j.ceramint.2021.06.211. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Mazo M.A., Colomer M.T., Tamayo A., Rubio J. Hierarchical Porous Fluorine-doped Silicon Oxycarbide Derived Materials: Physicochemical Characterization and Electrochemical Behaviour. Microp. Mesop. Mat. 2022;330:111604. doi: 10.1016/j.micromeso.2021.111604. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Mérida J., Colomer M.T., Rubio F., Mazo M.A. Highly Porous Carbon Materials Derived from Silicon Oxycarbides and Effect of the Pyrolysis Temperature on Their Electrochemical Response. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023;24:13868. doi: 10.3390/ijms241813868. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Sujith R., Gangadhar J., Greenough M., Bordia R.K., Panda D.K. A Review of Silicon Oxycarbide Ceramics as Next Generation Anode Materials for Lithium-Ion Batteries and Other Electrochemical Applications. J. Mater. Chem. A. 2023;11:20324. doi: 10.1039/d3ta01366a. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Shen Y.Y., Zheng Y., Jiang J.M., Huang Y.K., Liu Y.N., Chen R., Jia P.S., Long L.F., Zhang C.C., Shao H.Y. Multifunctional Phosphorus Doping: Integrating Enhanced Ionic/Electronic Transport and Interface Optimization for Silicon Oxycarbide Anodes. Energy Environ. Mater. 2026:e70301. doi: 10.1002/eem2.70301. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Kong D., Wu H., Zhang Q., Lyu D., Han Y., Zhang Z., Ren L. Research Progress on Bio-Inspired Composite Structures Based on Ceramic 3D Printing: A Review. Int. J. Extrem. Manuf. 2026;8:032012. doi: 10.1088/2631-7990/ae3a5b. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 22.González-Gómez M.A., Arnosa-Prieto Á, García-Acevedo P., Diaz-Rodriguez P., de Castro-Alves L., Piñeiro Y., Rivas J. Surface-Modified Iron Oxide Nanoprobes in Biomedical Scaffolds. Nanoscale Adv. 2025;7:8093. doi: 10.1039/D5NA00605H. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
