Skip to main content
Microorganisms logoLink to Microorganisms
. 2026 Mar 10;14(3):627. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms14030627

Identification of Pathogens and Biological Control of Wheat Fusarium Crown Rot in Xinjiang with Pseudomonas aeruginosa J-7

Cuicui Yan 1,, Bin Zhang 1,2,, Beibei Shi 3, Yejuan Du 1, Zheng Liu 1, Jiafeng Huang 1,*, Qinggui Lian 1,*
Editor: Gary A Strobel
PMCID: PMC13028721  PMID: 41900386

Abstract

Wheat Fusarium crown rot (FCR), predominantly caused by Fusarium species, is a devastating fungal disease that severely threatens global wheat production. In this study, we combined phytopathological assays, molecular techniques, and bioinformatic analyses to systematically identify the causal agents of FCR in Xinjiang and to screen for potential biocontrol bacteria. A total of 296 fungal isolates were obtained from 195 FCR samples, collected from Yumin County and Xinhe County. Morphological and phylogenetic analyses revealed that Fusarium culmorum was the predominant pathogen, accounting for 73.6% of the total isolates. To evaluate the resistance of local wheat cultivars, F. culmorum XN22-1, a highly virulent strain from Xinhe County, was inoculated to 30 wheat varieties. The results demonstrated that most cultivars lacked resistance to FCR, with the exception of three varieties—Xinchun 19, Xinchun 50, and Youpi 23, which showed a mid-resistance. Given the scarcity of resistant cultivars, we focused on biological control. To control FCR, Pseudomonas aeruginosa J-7, exhibiting broad-spectrum antagonistic activity, was successfully isolated from rhizosphere soil based on the analysis of healthy rhizosphere soil microbial diversity. Subsequently, pot experiments showed that P. aeruginosa J-7 could significantly reduce the disease incidence and lower the disease index of wheat FCR. Furthermore, whole-genome sequencing, in-plate metabolite analysis, and observation on inhibition of spores and mycelium revealed that P. aeruginosa J-7 mediates its biocontrol activity primarily through the production of phenazine and siderophores, which collectively inhibit conidial germination and cause structural damage to the mycelium. This study not only clarifies the composition of FCR pathogens in Xinjiang but also provides a promising biocontrol agent and new strategic insights for the management of wheat crown rot.

Keywords: Fusarium crown rot, Fusarium culmorum, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, rhizosphere microbiome

1. Introduction

Wheat is one of the world’s most important cereal crops and a staple food for billions of people, meeting critical global energy and nutritional needs [1,2]. While global demand for wheat continues to grow, its production is increasingly constrained by the cumulative effects of abiotic and biotic stresses [3]. Fusarium crown rot (FCR), a soil-borne disease caused by pathogenic Fusarium species, was first identified in Australia in 1951 and has since emerged as a pervasive global threat to wheat, resulting in substantial annual yield and quality reductions worldwide [4,5,6]. In Australia, FCR causes estimated annual losses of about $97 million in wheat and barley [7]. Similarly, in the U.S. Pacific Northwest, FCR may cause yield losses of up to 35% in winter wheat [8].

In China, FCR was first found in Henan (2012) and has spread to major wheat-growing regions with an increasing trend [9,10]. The disease caused substantial yield losses, reaching 30% in severely affected fields (e.g., Xuchang and Jiaozuo) and up to 38.0% in extreme cases [11]. Concurrently, the recent continuous expansion of wheat cultivation in Xinjiang has been accompanied by an increased incidence of pests and diseases, which pose a serious threat to production and adversely affect both quality and yield [12]. FCR is gradually becoming one of the most destructive diseases in wheat in Xinjiang.

In 2012, Li et al. first reported F. pseudograminearum as a causal agent of FCR in the Northwest wheat region [9]. Later, Yang et al. (2024) [13] identified a pathogen complex in Xinjiang’s spring wheat area consisting of F. acuminatum, F. oxysporum, and members of the F. equiseti species complex (FIESC). The pathogen composition of Fusarium crown rot in Xinjiang is complex, with multiple Fusarium species causing co-infection, which increases the difficulty of disease control.

Although resistant varieties are the most economical strategy for FCR control, fully resistant cultivars are unavailable. Only a few wheat lines with moderate resistance have been reported, most of which are old cultivars with low yield potential [12]. Owing to the lack of suitable resistant varieties, chemical control remains the main measure. However, both early and current fungicides only provide partial or short-term control, and their efficacy is limited at high disease severity; furthermore, they may cause chemical residue problems [14,15]. Therefore, sustainable alternatives such as biological control are urgently needed.

Compared to chemical control, biological control represents a more sustainable and eco-friendly alternative. Some studies have found that the composition and abundance of microbial communities in the rhizosphere are key determinants of plant health [16,17]. As a result, biological control (biocontrol) employing beneficial microorganisms has emerged as a prominent research area in sustainable disease control strategies [18,19,20,21,22]. Beneficial microorganisms mediate biocontrol through diverse mechanisms. Such as Bacillus spp., which could suppress F. graminearum via niche competition, antimicrobial lipopeptides, and host-induced berberine synthesis, reducing disease incidence by 53.9% [23]. The combined application of B. amyloliquefaciens T40 and Bacillus pumilus T208 could enhance rice resistance to F. oxysporum by modulating the rhizosphere microbiome and producing cyclic lipopeptides, such as surfactin and iturin, which directly inhibit the pathogen and induce systemic immunity [24,25]. Additionally, Chaetomium globosum G3 reduces F. verticillioides-induced maize seedling blight incidence from 81.5% to 37.6% through iron competition, enzymatic antagonism, and inhibition of fumonisin biosynthesis [26].

Although numerous studies have focused on developing biocontrol strains against FCR, their field performance has often been inconsistent. Several biocontrol agents have shown antagonistic activity against F. pseudograminearum in laboratory tests: O’Sullivan et al. identified two Streptomyces strains (MH71, MH243) with strong inhibitory effects in dual-culture and seedling assays, but their control efficacy remained low under greenhouse conditions [27]; Liu et al. found that Phanerochaete chrysosporium inhibits the pathogen in vitro, yet its limited efficacy in pot trials indicates poor field applicability [28]. Collectively, these studies show that while many biocontrol agents work well in laboratory settings, their reduced efficacy in simulated (greenhouse/pot) environments is the main reason they fail to translate to practical field use. Although F. pseudograminearum is widely recognized as the primary causal agent of wheat crown rot, systematic and in-depth studies on F. culmorum are still severely insufficient, leaving a critical knowledge gap. This gap constitutes the key scientific rationale and highlights the novelty of the present study.

Based on the above research gaps, this study combined phytopathological assays, molecular techniques, and bioinformatic analyses to systematically identify the causal agents of FCR in Xinjiang and to screen for potential biocontrol bacteria. Our preliminary results indicate that F. culmorum is the dominant pathogen of wheat FCR in Xinjiang, and P. aeruginosa shows potential in significantly reducing the disease index of wheat FCR by damaging pathogenic mycelium and inhibiting conidial germination. In addition, many previous studies have verified that P. aeruginosa strains possess remarkable biocontrol properties against diverse plant fungal diseases, providing reliable theoretical and experimental support for its selection in this study.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Disease Investigation and Pathogen Isolation and Identification

Field surveys were conducted at different growth stages (seedling and adult growth stages) across two locations (Yumin and Xinhe). To avoid edge effects, sampling commenced 5 m from the field border. We randomly established five points per field, assessing 30 plants per point. Disease incidence was visually estimated as the percentage of affected plants per plot, while severity was scored on a 0–5 scale following Martin’s method [29] (Supplementary Table S1). The incidence rate was calculated as follows: (Number of diseased plants/Total number of inoculated plants) × 100. The disease index (DI) = [∑(Number of plants in each severity grade × Severity grade)/(Total number of plants investigated × Highest severity grade)] × 100.

The collected samples were subjected to fungal isolation and purification via the tissue separation method, following the protocol outlined in ‘Experiences with the Isolation of Plant Pathogenic Fungi’ [30]. A total of 296 Fusarium isolates were obtained from wheat plants showing typical crown rot symptoms. The resulting isolates were preliminarily categorized according to the ‘Fungal Identification Manual’ assessing their colony morphology on potato dextrose agar (PDA) and conidial structures on carnation leaf agar (CLA). For pathogenicity assessment, representative 3 isolates from each morphological category were selected and inoculated into plants using a stem base drip method, as detailed by Mitter et al. [31] Subsequently, to satisfy Koch’s postulates, the pathogen was re-isolated from the symptomatic plant tissues and confirmed to be morphologically identical to the original inoculated strain.

The pathogenic strains were further morphologically identified by culture morphology on 8 madia (PDA, PSA, OA, VBC, CLA, CA, SNA, and MGA). All isolates were routinely cultured on these media for preliminary morphological identification, according to the Fusarium Laboratory Manual, Guidelines for the Identification of Common Fusarium Species, and Leslie & Summerell [32]. Then the genomic DNA of the pathogenic strain was extracted using the Biospin fungal genomic DNA extraction kit (TransGen Biotech, Beijing, China). The ITS region and the translation elongation factor 1-α (tef1-α) gene (Table S4) were amplified by with primers ITS1/ITS4 and EF1-728F/EF1-986R, respectively. The reaction system and amplification conditions were shown in Tables S2 and S3. The PCR products were visualized on 1% agarose gel and sequenced by Sanger method. The sequences were assembled and aligned, and phylogenetic analysis was performed using MEGA 7.0 based on concatenated tef1-α and ITS sequences. The phylogenetic tree was constructed by the Neighbor-Joining (NJ) method with 1000 bootstrap replicates to evaluate the reliability of the tree topology. The mating-type of 24 Fusarium class I isolates was detected via PCR amplification of mating-type idiomorph genes. Genomic DNA of the isolates (extracted via the Biospin fungal genomic DNA extraction kit, TransGen Biotech, Beijing, China) was used as the template, and the specific primers for mating-type amplification were MAT1-1F/MAT1-1R and MAT1-2F/MAT1-2R (Table S4). The PCR reaction system (25 μL) was composed of: 12.5 μL 2 × Taq PCR Master Mix (Tiangen, Beijing, China), 1 μL of each forward and reverse primer (10 μmol/L), 2 μL genomic DNA template (50 ng/μL), and 8.5 μL sterile double-distilled water. The PCR amplification program was set as: pre-denaturation at 94 °C for 5 min; 35 cycles of denaturation at 94 °C for 30 s, annealing at 58 °C for 30 s, extension at 72 °C for 45 s; final extension at 72 °C for 10 min, and preservation at 4 °C. The PCR products were separated by 1.0% agarose gel electrophoresis (120 V, 30 min), stained with ethidium bromide, and visualized under a gel imaging system (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA). The mating-type of each isolate was determined according to the presence of specific amplification bands: the appearance of a target band with MAT1-1F/MAT1-1R primers indicated the MAT1-1 mating-type, while a target band with MAT1-2F/MAT1-2R primers indicated the MAT1-2 mating-type. Three technical replicates were set for each sample to ensure the accuracy of detection results.

2.2. Resistance Evaluation of Wheat Varieties

The F. culmorum strain XN22-1 was selected for pathogenicity testing. A total of 30 wheat (Thirty wheat germplasm resources were involved in this study, with their detailed information (e.g., variety name, origin, and basic traits) provided in Table S9 of the Supplementary Materials) germplasm resources were evaluated. Sterilized nutrient soil and vermiculite were mixed at a ratio of 3:1, thoroughly mixed and filled into 5 × 5 × 5 cm black square pots. Wheat seeds with similar bud lengths were selected for sowing, with a sowing depth of approximately 1.5–2.5 cm, and 10 seeds were sown in each black square pot. The F. culmorum strain XN22-1 was inoculated into CMC medium and cultured with shaking at 28 °C for 7 days. The culture was filtered through 3 layers of sterile gauze to remove mycelial fragments, and the spore concentration was adjusted to 1 × 106 colony-forming units conidia/mL. The experiment was set with 3 biological replicates and 1 blank control group (inoculated with sterile distilled water instead of fungal inoculum). All experimental plants were maintained in a greenhouse at 24 °C with a photoperiod of 12 h of light/12 h of dark. The disease index was evaluated 50 days after inoculation.

The disease index (DI) was calculated, and the resistance of each wheat germplasm to Fusarium crown rot (FCR) was evaluated based on the average DI, according to the criteria detailed in Table S5.

2.3. Soil Sampling and Pot Experiment Setup

The purpose of this pot experiment was to initially verify that beneficial microorganisms in healthy soil (collected from disease-occurring areas) can resist pathogens and reduce the disease index. The experimental soil was natural saline-alkali clay soil with a clay texture and a pH of 8.4. Specifically, we compared wheat disease indices after inoculating the same pathogen in healthy and diseased soils, providing preliminary evidence for the disease-suppressive effect of beneficial microorganisms in healthy soil. Rhizosphere soil samples were collected from Xinhe County (a disease-occurring area): diseased samples from five wheat fields under continuous monoculture for at least three years (prone to F. culmorum-induced wheat diseases), and healthy samples from five newly planted or reclaimed wheat fields (no obvious wheat diseases). For the pot experiment, a portion of each soil type (healthy and diseased) was sterilized by autoclaving at 121 °C for 15 min (to eliminate all microorganisms, including beneficial ones), and the remainder was used as non-sterilized natural soil (to retain indigenous microorganisms). Seeds of the local prevalent cultivar Xindong 22 were surface-sterilized with 10% NaOCl for 30 min, rinsed thoroughly with sterile water, soaked for 12 h, and germinated in vermiculite. Each experimental unit was a 5 × 5 × 5 cm black square potfilled with 50 g of soil, with 10 seedlings per pot, with seedlings planted at 1.5–2.5 cm depth in four soil types: non-sterilized healthy soil, sterilized healthy soil, non-sterilized diseased soil, and sterilized diseased soil. The experiment included three replicates per soil treatment and one blank control group (inoculated with sterile distilled water instead of fungal spore suspension, with the same soil types and planting conditions as the treatments) to exclude interference from other factors. At the two-leaf stage, all treatment seedlings were given a single inoculation with 1 × 106 conidia/mL F. culmorum XN22-1 spore suspension (uniform inoculation conditions for all treatments) and maintained in a greenhouse at 24 °C with a 12 h light/12 h dark photoperiod. During the experiment, sterile distilled water was irrigated every 2 days to maintain soil moisture at 60 ± 5% (avoiding waterlogging), ensuring normal wheat growth, stable F. culmorum infection, and normal activity of indigenous microorganisms in non-sterilized soil. Disease index was assessed 14 days post-inoculation to compare disease severity among treatments and initially confirm the disease-resisting effect of beneficial microorganisms in healthy soil.

2.4. Microbiome Sequencing and Bioinformatic Analysis

Subsamples of healthy and diseased rhizosphere soils (three replicates each) using the E.Z.N.A.® Soil DNA Kit (Omega Bio-tek, Inc., Norcross, GA, USA). The DNA samples were shipped on dry ice to Majorbio Bio-pharm Technology Co. Ltd. (Shanghai, China) for high-throughput sequencing on an Illumina Nextseq2000 platform (Illumina, San Diego, CA, USA). The V3–V4 hypervariable region of the bacterial 16S rRNA gene was amplified using primers (Supplementary Table S3) 338F/806R (The PCR reaction mixture including 4 μL 5× Fast Pfu buffer, 2 μL 2.5 mM dNTPs, 0.8 μL each primer (5 μM), 0.4 μL Fast Pfu polymerase, 10 ng of template DNA, and ddH2O to a final volume of 20 µL. PCR amplification cycling conditions were as follows: initial denaturation at 95 °C for 3 min, followed by 27 cycles of denaturing at 95 °C for 30 s, annealing at 55 °C for 30 s and extension at 72 °C for 45 s, and single extension at 72 °C for 10 min, and end at 4 °C), and the ITS1 region of fungi was amplified with primers ITS1F/ITS2R (The PCR reaction mixture including 4 μL 5× Fast Pfu buffer, 2 μL 2.5 mM dNTPs, 0.8 μL each primer (5 μM), 0.4 μL Fast Pfu polymerase, 10 ng of template DNA, and ddH2O to a final volume of 20 µL. PCR amplification cycling conditions were as follows: initial denaturation at 95 °C for 3 min, followed by 27 cycles of denaturing at 95 °C for 30 s, annealing at 55 °C for 30 s and extension at 72 °C for 45 s, and single extension at 72 °C for 10 min, and end at 4 °C). Raw sequences were processed in QIIME 1.91, including quality filtering, chimera removal, and clustering into operational taxonomic units (OTUs) at 97% similarity using USEARCH (v10.0). OTUs representing less than 0.005% of total reads were discarded. All samples were rarefied to an equal sequencing depth, and taxonomy was assigned against the SILVA database. Community composition was visualized using bar plots of dominant taxa (GraphPad Prism 10). Alpha diversity (Shannon, Simpson, Chao1, and ACE indices) and beta diversity (PCoA and NMDS based on Bray–Curtis distance) were analyzed using the vegan package in R (v4.2.3). Differential taxa between healthy and diseased rhizospheres were identified by LEfSe analysis on the Majorbio cloud platform, using a Kruskal–Wallis test with p < 0.05 for significance testing and an LDA score threshold of ≥2.0 for effect size filtering.

2.5. Screening of Biocontrol Bacteria and Determination of Broad-Spectrum Antagonism

Bacteria were isolated from healthy rhizosphere soil samples using the serial dilution method. Specifically, 1 g of soil was suspended in 100 mL of sterile water and shaken at 150 rpm for 30 min. The suspension was serially diluted in sterile water to 10−6, and 200 μL from appropriate dilutions was spread on LB agar plates (three replicates per dilution). After incubation at 30 °C for 24 h, distinct colonies were selected, repeatedly streaked for purity, and stored as glycerol stocks at −80 °C.

Antagonistic activity was assessed using a dual-culture assay. A mycelial plug of F. culmorum XN22-1 was placed at the center of a PDA plate, and bacterial isolates were spot-inoculated at four equidistant points, 2 cm from the pathogen. Plates were incubated at 28 °C for 7–10 days, and the inhibition zone width was measured. The relative inhibition rate was calculated as follows:

Inhibition rate (%) = [(Control colony diameter − Treatment colony diameter)/Control colony diameter] × 100. The broad-spectrum antagonistic activity of the most potent isolate, J-7, was further evaluated against additional wheat FCR pathogens (F. pseudograminearum, F. graminearum, B. sorokiniana) and other soil-borne pathogens (Verticillium dahliae, Rhizoctonia solani, Cytospora chrysosperma, Macrophomina phaseolina, Trichothecium roseum, Valsa pyri) using the same dual-culture method.

2.6. Molecular Identification of Isolate J-7

Isolate J-7 was characterized morphologically on LB agar and through Gram staining. Genomic DNA of P. aeruginosa J-7 was extracted using the E.Z.N.A.® Bacterial DNA Kit (Omega Bio-tek, Norcross, GA, USA). The 16S rRNA gene was amplified by PCR with universal primers 27F (5′-AGAGTTTGATCCTGGCTCAG-3′) and 1492R (5′-GGTTACCTTGTTACGACTT-3′). The 25 μL PCR mixture contained 12.5 μL of 2× Taq PCR MasterMix, 1 μL of 10 μM forward primer, 1 μL of 10 μM reverse primer, 1 μL of template DNA, and 9.5 μL of sterile ddH2O. Thermal cycling conditions were as follows: 95 °C for 5 min, followed by 30 cycles of 95 °C for 30 s, 55 °C for 30 s, and 72 °C for 90 s, with a final extension at 72 °C for 10 min. Whole-genome sequencing was performed using the Illumina platform. The whole-genome sequencing data of P. aeruginosa J-7 were deposited in the Genome Sequence Archive (GSA) under the accession number CRA037583.The phylogenetic tree of strain J-7 was constructed in MEGA 7.0 using the neighbor-joining method, and the tree topology was verified by bootstrap analysis with 1000 replicate bootstrap values to ensure its reliability.

2.7. Biocontrol and Growth Promotion Effects of P. aeruginosa J-7

Wheat seeds (Xindong 48) were used. Seeds were first surface-sterilized with 10% NaOCl for 30 min, rinsed thoroughly with sterile water, soaked for 12 h, and pre-germinated in sterile vermiculite. After germination, only seedlings without visible fungal growth or abnormalities were selected for subsequent experiments to ensure that the seeds/seedlings were not infected by other plant pathogens. Each replicate contained 10 wheat seedlings, each treatment included three biological replicates, and the entire experiment was repeated three times independently. Three treatments were established, each with three replicates: Wheat seedlings at the two-leaf stage were treated as follows:

First, the preparation procedures of bacterial inoculum and fungal spore suspension were clarified: The P. aeruginosa J-7 bacterial inoculum was prepared as a pre-inoculum: J-7 strain was inoculated into LB liquid medium and cultured at 30 °C with shaking at 150 rpm for 24 h, then adjusted to OD600 = 1(1 × 108 CFU/mL) with sterile water to obtain the bacterial suspension used in the experiment. The F. culmorum XN22-1 spore suspension (1 × 106 conidia/mL) was obtained by inoculating XN22-1 strain into CMC medium, culturing with shaking at 28 °C for 7 days, filtering through 3 layers of sterile gauze to remove mycelial fragments, and adjusting the spore concentration with sterile water using a hemocytometer.

Treatment 1 (J-7 + F. culmorum) received 5 mL of J-7 bacterial suspension (OD600 = 1), followed two days later by 2 mL of XN22-1 spore suspension (1 × 106 conidia/mL). Treatment 2 (F. culmorum) received 5 mL of sterile water, followed by the same spore inoculation as Treatment 1. Treatment 3 (CK control) received sterile water in both applications.

All experimental plants were maintained under controlled conditions at 24 °C with a 12 h light/12 h dark photoperiod; sterile distilled water was irrigated every 2 days to keep the soil moisture at 60 ± 5% (avoiding waterlogging). The trial duration was 28 days (consistent with the growth promotion assay). Disease incidence and index were assessed 21 days post-inoculation.

Growth promotion assay: To assess plant growth promotion, 10 wheat seedlings were used per replicate, with three biological replicates, and the experiment was repeated three times independently. wheat plants at the two-leaf stage (selected by the same pre-germination and screening method mentioned above) were treated with 2 mL of P. aeruginosa J-7 bacterial suspension (OD600 = 1) via root drenching. Control plants received sterile water. All plants were maintained under the same controlled conditions (24 °C, 12 h light/12 h dark photoperiod, regular irrigation) for 28 days, after which growth parameters including plant height, fresh weight, and dry weight were measured and recorded.

2.8. Whole Genome Sequencing and Analysis

The whole genome of P. aeruginosa J-7 was sequenced on the PacBio Sequel II platform (Shanghai Meiji Biomedical Technology Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China). The subsequent bioinformatic analysis involved: quality control and filtering of raw data with fastp v0.20.0; genome assembly using third-generation software with quality assessed by BUSCO v4.5.5; and comprehensive genomic component annotation using Prodigal [33] v2.6.3/GeneMarkS [34] v4.3 (genes), TRF v4.09.1/RepeatMasker v4.1.5 (repeats), Minced v0.2.0 (CRISPR arrays), barrnap v0.9 (https://github.com/tseemann/barrnap/, accessed on 24 February 2026) /tRNAscan-SE [35] v2.0.12/Infernal v1.1.5 (non-coding RNAs), and Phigaro v2.4.0 (prophages). Functionally, proteins were annotated against NR, Swiss-Prot, and KEGG via Diamond v0.8.35/BLAST+ v2.3.0; secondary metabolite gene clusters were predicted with antiSMASH v7.0.0; and virulence/host-interaction genes were identified using VFDB (http://www.mgc.ac.cn/VFs/main.htm, accessed on 24 February 2026). and PHI v5.0 (http://www.phi-base.org/, accessed on 24 February 2026). databases to elucidate potential antifungal mechanisms.

2.9. Detection of Growth-Promoting Factors and Cell Wall-Degrading Enzyme Production Capacity of the Biocontrol Bacterium

Bacterial plugs (6 mm) of P. aeruginosa J-7 were inoculated onto chrome azurol S (CAS) agar for siderophore detection, as well as organic and inorganic phosphorus media for phosphate solubilization assays. Plates were incubated statically at 28 °C for 3 days. For all plate-based assays, the potency index (PI) was quantified as the core evaluation index, calculated by the formula: PI = Diameter of the characteristic halo/clear zone (D, cm)/Diameter of the bacterial colony (d, cm). Orange halo zones on CAS agar indicated siderophore production, and the siderophore production capacity was quantified by the PI value of the orange halo zone to the colony; clear zones on phosphorus media indicated phosphate solubilization capacity, and the phosphate solubilization ability was quantified by the PI value of the phosphorus solubilization clear zone to the colony. LB medium plugs served as the control. Each assay was performed in triplicate.

To assess hydrolytic enzyme production, P. aeruginosa J-7 was inoculated onto carboxymethyl cellulose (CMC) medium for cellulase, skim milk agar for protease, and starch agar for amylase activity. After 3 days of incubation at 28 °C (LB medium plugs served as the control), CMC plates were stained with Congo red (1%), skim milk plates were directly observed for clearance zones, and starch plates were treated with Lugol’s iodine solution. The appearance of clear hydrolysis zones around colonies indicated positive enzymatic activity, and the activity of cellulase, protease and amylase was separately quantified by the PI value of the corresponding hydrolysis clear zone to the colony for each enzyme detection plate. All experiments included controls and were repeated three times.

2.10. Study on Inhibition of Pathogen Spores and Mycelium

Spore germination assay: a 1:1 mixture of P. aeruginosa J-7 bacterial suspension (OD600 = 1) and F. culmorum XN22-1 conidial suspension was prepared (1 × 106 conidia/mL), while the control received sterile water instead of bacterial suspension. The mixtures were incubated at 25 °C, and conidial germination was assessed at 1 h intervals under a light microscope. Germination was defined as the emergence of a germ tube exceeding two-thirds of the conidium length. The percentage of germinated conidia was recorded for each treatment. Mycelial inhibition assay: Mycelial plugs from the inhibition zone in dual-culture assays with XN22-1 were collected at various time points, stained with 0.4% trypan blue solution, and examined microscopically for structural abnormalities. The trypan blue staining solution (0.4%) was prepared in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) and stored at 4 °C prior to use.

2.11. Quantification and Statistical Analysis

All statistical analyses were performed using SPSS software (version 19.0), and a p value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Data visualization (histograms) was completed using GraphPad Prism software (version 10.0), and all data are presented as mean ± SEM (n = 3 independent biological replicates).

Biological data (including wheat growth parameters such as plant height, fresh weight, dry weight, and disease incidence/index) were subjected to two-tailed Student’s t-test, as these data conformed to the normal distribution and homogeneity of variance, which is the applicable condition for Student’s t-test.

Microbiological data (including alpha diversity indices such as Chao1, Shannon, and Simpson, as well as intergroup differences in microbial community composition) were analyzed using Wilcoxon rank-sum test, which is suitable for non-normally distributed data or data that do not meet the assumptions of parametric tests.

Bioinformatic analysis was conducted on the Majorbio Cloud platform. Taxonomic annotation of bacterial 16S rRNA gene sequences and fungal ITS sequences was performed against the SILVA 16S rRNA database (v138) and UNITE database (v8.2), respectively. Principal coordinate analysis (PCoA) based on Bray–Curtis distance was used to evaluate the similarity of microbial community structure among samples, and PERMANOVA test was further used to verify significant differences in community structure between groups. LEfSe analysis (LDA score > 2, p < 0.05) was employed to identify significantly differential microbial taxa from phylum to genus level among different treatment groups.

3. Results

3.1. The Incidence of Wheat FCR in Xinjiang Is Increasing Year by Year

Field surveys in Yumin (Tacheng) and Xinhe (Aksu) counties during 2022–2023 showed that wheat Fusarium crown rot (FCR) occurred at both seedling and adult stages. At the seedling stage, infected plants exhibited leaf yellowing and yellow-brown to dark brown necrotic lesions on the stem base, with obvious chlorotic patches in severely diseased fields (Figure 1A–C). At the adult stage, dark brown necrosis and pink mycelial mats appeared on the stem base; spikes showed chlorosis and whitening, and severely infected plants were stunted with premature senescence and sterile shriveled white spikes (Figure 1F–H).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Symptoms and disease indices of wheat Fusarium crown rot. (AC) Field symptoms of FCR at wheat seedling stage. (D,E) Field disease incidence and index at seedling stage. (FH) Field symptoms of FCR at wheat adult stage. (I,J) Field disease incidence and index at adult stage.Data are mean ± SEM (n = 3 independent biological replicates). * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, **** p < 0.0001 (two-tailed Student’s t-test).

Disease incidence and severity were significantly higher in Xinhe County than in Yumin County. In Yumin, the average seedling incidence was 14.60%, with a disease index of 3.92, increasing to 36.48% and 29.90, respectively, at the adult growth stage. In contrast, Xinhe County recorded 24.60% incidence and a disease index of 16.88 at the seedling stage, rising to 52.40% and 46.44 at the adult growth stage (Figure 1D,E,I,J). These results indicate that FCR severity escalates from seedling to adult growth stages and is more widespread and severe in Xinhe County.

3.2. F. culmorum Is the Dominant Pathogen of Wheat FCR in Xinjiang

A total of 296 fungal isolates were obtained from 195 (Table S7) diseased wheat samples collected across different regions and growth stages through single-spore purification. Preliminary classification based on colony morphology and conidial characteristics on PDA after 7 days revealed that Fusarium spp. predominated (83.8%), followed by Bipolaris spp. (14.5%) and Alternaria spp. (1.7%) (Figure 2A), indicating Fusarium as the primary genus associated with FCR in Xinjiang (Figure 2B).

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Pathogen isolation and pathogenicity identification of wheat stem rot. Note: I–VIII is the colony morphology of eight types of fungi isolated from diseased samples on PDA. (A) The culture status and spore morphology of eight Fusarium species on PDA and CLA. (B) Preliminary statistical pie chart of pathogen isolation frequency. (C) Pie chart of three pathogenic bacteria with pathogenicity. (D) The growth and incidence of wheat four weeks after inoculation with Fusarium II (CK (control check) = blank control group, wheat seedlings inoculated with sterile distilled water instead of Fusarium spore suspension under the same culture conditions). (E) The average incidence of wheat after 4 weeks of inoculation with Fusarium II. (F) Disease index of wheat 4 weeks after inoculation with Fusarium II. Disease index of wheat 4 weeks after inoculation with Fusarium II. Data are shown as mean ± SEM (n = 3 independent biological replicates). Statistical significance was determined by two-tailed Student’s t-test (**** p < 0.0001).

The 195 Fusarium isolates were classified into eight morphotypes according to their cultural characteristics on PDA and conidial morphology on PDA or CLA (Figure 2A). Pathogenicity tests using two representative isolates from each category demonstrated that only isolates from Fusarium I and Fusarium II induced typical FCR symptoms. Category I isolates caused disease indices 68.55 (Figure 2D–F), while Fusarium II isolates resulted in indices 76.35 (Figure S1A–C). Fusarium III isolates induced only limited heart leaf wilting without characteristic FCR symptoms, and Fusarium IV–VIII were non-pathogenic. All Bipolaris isolates (classified as Bipolaris I) were also pathogenic, with a mean disease index of 33.84 (Figure S1D–F).

Further morphological and molecular characterization confirmed the identity of the pathogenic groups. Representative isolate XN22-1 (Fusarium I) was cultured on eight different media (PDA, PSA, MGA, OA, VBC, SNA, CA, CLA) and exhibited morphological features consistent with F. culmorum (Figure 3A,D). Molecular analysis based on concatenated tef1-α and ITS sequences placed all five representative Fusarium isolates within a clade containing reference F. culmorum strains (Figure 3B). Consistent with the morphological identification, molecular analysis confirmed that Fusarium I isolate XN22-1 was Fusarium culmorum. Mating-type analysis of 24 Fusarium isolates showed that 10 were MAT1-1, 10 were MAT1-2, and 4 yielded positive PCR results for both MAT1-1 and MAT1-2 idiomorphs (Figure 3C,E).

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Morphological identification, phylogenetic tree analysis and mating type identification of Fusarium I. (A) The culture characteristics and conidial morphology of the representative strain XN22-1 of Fusarium on 8 different media. (B) A phylogenetic tree based on tef1-α gene and ITS region nucleotide sequence was constructed. (C) Microscopic characteristics of the representative strain XN22-1 of Fusarium I. Note: I, II: Conidiophores formed on PDA; III: sentchlamydospores cultured on PDA; IV: The red framed part on the petri dish is the myxosporium formed by Fusarium I on PDA; V: Microstructure of myxosporium formed by Fusarium I on PDA; VI: Conidiophores produced on PSA. (D) Mating type detection of 24 strains of Fusarium I. Note: (a) Fusarium I isolated from wheat at adult stage; (b) Fusarium I from wheat at seedling stage. (E) Mating type proportion pie chart of 24 strains of Fusarium I.

Similarly, Fusarium II and Bipolaris I were identified as Fusarium pseudograminearum (Figure S2A,B) and Bipolaris sorokiniana (Figure S2C,D, respectively, through morphological and multi-locus phylogenetic analysis. Final species distribution analysis confirmed F. culmorum as the dominant pathogen, comprising 73.6% (78 isolates) of the pathogenic isolates, followed by F. pseudograminearum (14.1%, 15 isolates) and B. sorokiniana (12.3%, 13 isolates) (Figure 2C and Table S8). These results establish F. culmorum as the principal causative agent of wheat FCR in Xinjiang.

3.3. Xinjiang Lacks Wheat Varieties Resistant to FCR

Pathogenicity screening of 30 wheat varieties inoculated with F. culmorum XN22-1 revealed severe susceptibility to FCR across most cultivars (Table S9). Only three varieties—Xinchun 19, Xinchun 50, and Youpi 23—exhibited mid-resistance, with mean disease indices of 22.50, 25.00, and 30.00, respectively. One variety, Huachangmai 26, was susceptible (disease index 40.00), while the remaining 26 varieties were highly susceptible, all showing disease indices exceeding 41.25. These results demonstrate that among the tested wheat germplasms, only 10% displayed moderate resistance to F. culmorum, whereas the majority (86.7%) were susceptible or highly susceptible. This clear lack of resistant varieties underscores the urgent need to incorporate FCR resistance into wheat breeding programs targeting Xinjiang and similar agro-ecological regions.

3.4. Soil Microorganisms Reduce the Disease Index of Wheat FCR

To identify biocontrol agents with potential for local application, we compared the suppressive capacity of rhizosphere soils from healthy and FCR-diseased wheat plants. In pot experiments using the prevalent local cultivar Xindong 22, plants grown in non-sterilized healthy rhizosphere soil showed significantly reduced FCR symptoms compared to those in sterilized soil after inoculation with F. culmorum XN22-1 (1 × 106 conidia/mL) (Figure 4A). Quantitative assessment revealed that the native soil microbiome reduced the disease index from 90.67 in sterilized soil to 74.67 in non-sterilized soil (Figure 4B), demonstrating that indigenous microorganisms in healthy rhizosphere soil significantly suppress FCR development.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Analysis of soil microbial diversity. (A) Wheat growth and disease symptoms at 14 days after F. culmorum inoculation. (B) Wheat disease index at 14 days post inoculation. (C) Bacterial (left) and fungal (right) beta diversity analysis. (D) Bacterial LEfSe multi-level species cladogram. (E) Two-group comparison box plots. Data are mean ± SEM (n = 3 independent biological replicates). * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01 (Student’s t-test for (B,C); Wilcoxon rank-sum test for (E)).

3.5. Pseudomonas Is Significantly Enriched in the Rhizosphere Soil of Healthy Plants

To further characterize the rhizosphere microbiome, we performed high-throughput sequencing of bacterial and fungal communities from five healthy (N) and five diseased (B) wheat rhizosphere soil samples, each with three replicates. A total of 1,531,459 high-quality bacterial sequences (641,994,582 bp, average length 419 bp) were obtained, clustered into 8845 OTUs, and annotated into 45 phyla and 1230 genera. For fungi, 2,032,345 high-quality sequences (491,306,870 bp, average length 241 bp) yielded 2341 OTUs, representing 17 phyla and 491 genera (Figure S3A). Rarefaction curves indicated sufficient sequencing depth to capture microbial diversity (Figure S3A).

At the phylum level (Figure S3B), the bacterial community was dominated by Pseudomonadota (31.87%), Bacteroidota (15.74%), and Bacillota (9.34%), whereas the fungal community was primarily composed of Ascomycota (61.75%), Olpidiomycota (18.94%), and Mortierellomycota (10.91%). Beta diversity analysis using PLS-DA revealed clear separation between the N and B groups (Figure S3C), indicating distinct bacterial and fungal community structures between healthy and diseased rhizospheres. Permutation testing confirmed significant differences in microbial community composition between the two groups (Figure 4C). Venn analysis at the phylum level (Figure S3D,E) showed that Pseudomonadota was the most abundant bacterial phylum in both groups (30.06%). At the genus level (Figure S3F), Pseudomonas under Pseudomonadota was significantly more abundant in the N group, whereas Fusarium was enriched in the B group. LEFSe analysis (LDA > 4, p < 0.05) identified Pseudomonadota as a significantly enriched biomarker in the N group (Figure 4D). Differential analysis at the genus level further confirmed that Pseudomonas was significantly more abundant in healthy rhizosphere soils (Figure 4E). These results collectively demonstrate that Pseudomonas is notably enriched in the rhizosphere of healthy wheat plants.

3.6. P. aeruginosa Isolate J-7 Exhibits Broad-Spectrum Antagonistic Activity Against Plant Pathogens

Fifty-four bacterial isolates were obtained from healthy rhizosphere soils. To identify the most potent biocontrol candidate, all isolates were initially screened for antagonistic activity against F. culmorum XN22-1 using a dual-culture assay. Among them, isolate J-7 exhibited the most pronounced inhibitory effect, with an inhibition rate of 70.98% (Figure 5A–D). This robust activity positioned J-7 as the primary candidate for subsequent broad-spectrum evaluation. The broad-spectrum antagonism of J-7 was then systematically assessed against a panel of pathogens. Subsequent evaluation against other wheat FCR pathogens revealed consistent efficacy, with inhibition rates >70% against F. pseudograminearum, F. graminearum, and B. sorokiniana (Figure 5E,F). Given its potent activity against FCR pathogens, we further assessed isolate J-7’s inhibitory spectrum against six additional soil-borne pathogens: Verticillium dahliae, Rhizoctonia solani, Cytospora chrysosperma, Macrophomina phaseolina, Trichothecium roseum, and Valsa pyri. Isolate J-7 maintained inhibition rates above 70% against all tested pathogens, with particularly strong activity against V. dahliae (91.70% inhibition) (Figure 5G,H). These results demonstrate the broad-spectrum antagonistic capability of isolate J-7, suggesting its potential as a versatile biocontrol agent.

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Inhibitory effects and identification of isolate J-7. (A) Dual-culture plate showing inhibition of F. culmorum mycelial growth by isolate J-7. (B) Colony diameter of F. culmorum in the presence of isolate J-7. (C) Measurement of the inhibition zone against F. culmorum. (D) Inhibition rate of isolate J-7 against F. culmorum mycelial growth. (E) Dual-culture plates showing inhibition of other wheat FCR pathogens by isolate J-7. (F) Inhibition rates of isolate J-7 against other wheat FCR pathogens. (G) Dual-culture plates showing inhibition of soil-borne pathogens by isolate J-7. (H) Inhibition rates of isolate J-7 against soil-borne pathogens. (I) Phylogenetic tree of isolate J-7 based on 16S rDNA sequence. Data are shown as mean ± SEM (n = 3 independent biological replicates). Statistical significance was determined by two-tailed Student’s t-test (* p < 0.05, *** p < 0.001, **** p < 0.0001).

Based on comprehensive characterization including morphological observation (Figure S4), physiological and biochemical tests (Table S10), and phylogenetic analysis of the 16S rDNA sequence (Figure 5I), isolate J-7 was identified as Pseudomonas aeruginosa.

3.7. P. aeruginosa J-7 Has Both Control and Growth-Promoting Effects

Although the in vitro antagonistic effect of J-7 was remarkable, its biocontrol efficacy against wheat crown rot was further verified via pot experiments. Three treatments were established in this study.

After 21 days of inoculation, typical FCR symptoms appeared in seedlings treated with F. culmorum alone, while plants inoculated with P. aeruginosa J-7 showed significantly reduced disease severity (Figure 6A,B). Quantitative analysis demonstrated that J-7 treatment significantly decreased both disease incidence and disease index (p < 0.05) (Figure 6C,D), confirming the protective effect of J-7 against wheat FCR.

Figure 6.

Figure 6

Pot experiment with P. aeruginosa J-7 and F. culmorum to verify the inhibitory effect of P. aeruginosa J-7 against F. culmorum and its growth-promoting effect on wheat. (A) Growth of wheat (cv. Xindong 48) 21 days after inoculation with the pathogen and P. aeruginosa J-7. (B) Disease symptoms at the wheat stem base 21 days after inoculation. (C) Average disease incidence of wheat 21 days after inoculation. Values represent mean ± SD of three independent experiments. (D) Disease index of wheat 21 days after inoculation. Values represent mean ± SD of three independent experiments. (E) Growth of wheat 28 days after treatment with P. aeruginosa J-7. (FI) Physiological parameters of wheat (cv. Xindong 48) measured to assess the growth-promoting ability of P. aeruginosa J-7: (F) height, (G) fresh weight, (H) stem diameter, and (I) dry weight. Data are shown as mean ± SEM (n = 3 independent biological replicates). Statistical significance was determined by two-tailed Student’s t-test (* p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001, **** p < 0.0001).

The growth-promoting capacity of J-7 was also assessed. After 28 days of cultivation, seedlings treated with P. aeruginosa J-7 exhibited much stronger growth vigor than the control (Figure 6E). Physiological measurements showed that J-7 significantly improved plant height, fresh weight and dry weight, with dry matter accumulation more than twice that of the control (Figure 6F–I). These results demonstrate that P. aeruginosa J-7 can not only effectively control wheat FCR, but also promote wheat seedling growth.

3.8. Genomic Features of P. aeruginosa J-7 Indicates Reveal Multiple Biocontrol Mechanisms

Whole-genome sequencing of P. aeruginosa J-7 was performed to elucidate its genetic potential for biocontrol and plant growth promotion (Figure 7A). The complete genome comprises 6,448,507 bp with a GC content of 67.03%, encoding 4881 genes with an average length of 980.58 bp. Protein-coding sequences comprised 89.82% of the annotated genome. Genomic analysis identified 10 genes associated with biocontrol activities (Table S11). These include 20 phz genes involved in phenazine antibiotic biosynthesis, 9 genes (pvdA, pvdQ, pvdG, pvdP, pvdR, pvdF, pvdN, pvdS, pvdL) responsible for pyoverdine siderophore production, and 8 pch genes required for pyochelin siderophore synthesis. Additionally, the genome contains 1 rhlR, a key regulatory gene for rhamnolipid biosynthesis. Several plant growth-promoting genes were also identified, including phoQ involved in phosphate metabolism. These genomic features collectively indicate that P. aeruginosa J-7 possesses substantial potential for both biological control and plant growth promotion.

Figure 7.

Figure 7

Inhibition of spore germination and mycelial damage by P. aeruginosa J-7. (A) Circular genome map of P. aeruginosa J-7. Notes: The outermost circle indicates genome size; the second and third circles represent CDS on positive and negative strands, with different colors indicating functional classifications of COGs; the fourth circle shows rRNA and tRNA; the fifth circle displays GC content (outward red regions indicate higher than average GC content, inward blue regions indicate lower than average); the innermost circle shows GC skew values [(G-C)/(G + C)], which assists in identifying leading/lagging strands and replication origin/terminus in circular genomes. (B) In vitro detection of cell wall-degrading enzymes and growth-promoting factors production by P. aeruginosa J-7. (IVI): organic phosphate, siderophore, inorganic phosphate, protease, amylase, cellulase. (C) Inhibition of F. culmorum conidia germination by P. aeruginosa J-7 at 12 h and 24 h; line chart shows conidia germination inhibition from 6 to 24 h. While untreated spores germinated almost completely, the germination rate of XN22-1 conidia treated with the bacterial suspension started at only 6% after 6 h, reached 15% by 18 h, and was subsequently suppressed by the proliferating J-7, eventually ceasing entirely. (D) Microscopic observation of F. culmorum mycelial inhibition by P. aeruginosa J-7 (3–9 d). Note: Blue staining indicates trypan blue staining. Untreated hyphae appeared slender and smooth with uniform diameter, whereas the treated hyphae exhibited sequential structural alterations: initially, the internodal regions became shortened, swollen, and flattened; subsequently, the hyphal tips showed distinct swelling; further manifestations included overall shortening, vesicular swelling, and increased branching. Ultimately, the hyphae displayed progressive degenerative changes in the internal membrane structure (vacuolization), culminating in shrinkage, rupture, and cytoplasmic leakage leading to cell death.

3.9. Antagonistic Mechanisms of P. aeruginosa J-7 Against F. culmorum

P. aeruginosa J-7 demonstrated the ability to produce multiple cell wall-degrading enzymes, as evidenced by clear hydrolysis zones (48.86%, 31.11%, 13.63%) on specific detection media for protease, cellulase, and amylase (Figure 7B(IV–VI)). The strain also exhibited plant growth-promoting traits, showing siderophore production and phosphate solubilization capacity through formation of characteristic zones (57.36%, 44.23%, 29.85%) on CAS and phosphorus media (Figure 7B(I–III)).

To investigate the antifungal activity against F. culmorum, we examined the effect of P. aeruginosa J-7 on conidia germination and mycelial morphology. In co-culture experiments with P. aeruginosa J-7 bacterial suspension (OD600 = 1.0), F. culmorum XN22-1 conidia germination was strongly inhibited. Untreated conidia showed rapid germination, exceeding 50% at 6 h and nearly reaching completion (98%) by 12 h. In contrast, the germination of P. aeruginosa J-7-treated conidia was drastically inhibited, plateauing at only 15% by 18 h before ceasing entirely (Figure 7C). Microscopic examination revealed that P. aeruginosa J-7 induced severe morphological alterations in F. culmorum mycelia, such as hyphal shortening, swelling, tip deformation, vesiculation, and excessive branching (Figure 7D).

Trypan blue staining revealed a time-dependent loss of membrane integrity in P. aeruginosa J-7-treated hyphae, accompanied by progressive cellular degeneration—including vacuolization, cytoplasmic leakage, and eventual cell death—which intensified from 3 to 9 days of exposure. Collectively, our findings point to a multi-faceted antagonistic strategy employed by P. aeruginosa J-7. The combined action of cell wall-degrading enzymes, siderophore-mediated competition, and direct physical damage to fungal structures effectively suppresses the growth and development of F. culmorum.

4. Discussion

In 2024, Gao et al. confirmed the occurrence of FCR caused by F. culmorum on winter wheat in China’s Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region [12]. These findings suggest a more complex pathogenic composition in Xinjiang compared to other wheat-growing regions in China, compounded by notable environmental differences between the northern and southern parts of the region. Despite these insights, the overall occurrence and distribution of FCR in Xinjiang remain poorly characterized.

As a major and persistent disease in global wheat production, Fusarium crown rot (FCR) has emerged as a significant threat to wheat safety in Xinjiang. In this study, we identified F. culmorum as the core causal agent of wheat FCR in Xinjiang, accounting for 73.6% of the isolates. This result fills a knowledge gap regarding the causal agents of FCR in Xinjiang. Our findings show that F. culmorum is the dominant pathogen in this region. This differs from reports in major wheat-growing areas such as Australia and the U.S. Pacific Northwest, where F. pseudograminearum is more prevalent [36,37,38,39]. Most previous studies have suggested that F. pseudograminearum dominates in drier and warmer regions, while F. culmorum is more common in cooler and wetter environments [40,41,42,43,44,45]. In China, the distribution of FCR pathogens follows clear climate-dependent patterns. On the North China Plain (including Henan, Shandong, Jiangsu, and parts of Shaanxi and Shanxi), F. pseudograminearum has been the dominant pathogen since 2011. This matches the warm and relatively arid climate in this region [46,47]. In wheat–rice rotation areas such as Jiangsu and Anhui, frequent rainfall during wheat heading favors F. asiaticum as the primary pathogen, followed by F. graminearum. In cooler and more humid regions such as Xingtai and Handan in Hebei Province, F. culmorum is the dominant species, consistent with local climatic conditions [48]. Our results clarify the pathogen composition of FCR in this important wheat-producing region. They also reveal an interesting ecological pattern: Xinjiang has an arid climate, which would theoretically favor F. pseudograminearum, yet F. culmorum is dominant here.

The dominance of F. culmorum in an arid environment challenges simplistic climate-pathogen distribution models. This pattern is consistent with reports from dry regions such as Algeria, where F. culmorum is also dominant. Several factors may explain this contradiction. First, drought tolerance in some F. culmorum strains may support their adaptation to Xinjiang’s dry conditions [49,50]. Second, local irrigation creates favorable rhizosphere microenvironments that alleviate regional aridity. Niche specialization also differs between species: F. culmorum is more aggressive to seeds and heads, whereas F. pseudograminearum mainly damages crown tissues. This difference helps explain the dominance of F. culmorum in early wheat growth stages. Similar to Algeria, the low prevalence of F. pseudograminearum may result from local agronomic practices, microclimates, or historical pathogen establishment. Overall, pathogen distribution is shaped not only by climate but also by ecological adaptation and agricultural management. Future work should investigate the genetic diversity and functional traits of F. culmorum in Xinjiang to clarify its regional dominance.

The clear identification of F. culmorum as the dominant pathogen underscores the urgency of developing effective control measures. Compounding this urgency, the lack of resistant wheat varieties in Xinjiang is a major concern. Our resistance screening of 30 local and introduced varieties revealed that only three exhibited moderate resistance, underscoring an urgent need for breeding programs focused on FCR resistance. This aligns with global challenges where fully resistant varieties remain scarce, and most commercial cultivars show susceptibility [51,52,53]. Mid-resistance was observed in Xinchun 19, Xinchun 50, and Youpi 23, which provide valuable genetic resources for future breeding.

In this, we turn our attention to biological control. The enrichment of Pseudomonas in the rhizosphere of healthy seedlings suggests a protective role of specific bacterial consortia against FCR. P. aeruginosa J-7, which exhibits strong broad-spectrum antagonism against multiple pathogens, including F. culmorum, F. graminearum, and B. sorokiniana, highlights its potential as a biocontrol agent. The efficacy of P. aeruginosa J-7 in reducing disease incidence and index in pot experiments supports its practical applicability, although field trials are necessary to confirm these results under natural conditions. Genomic analysis of P. aeruginosa J-7 revealed the presence of genes involved in the synthesis of phenazines, pyoverdine, pyochelin, and rhamnolipids—compounds known to contribute to antibiosis and induced systemic resistance [54,55,56,57]. The production of siderophores and cell wall-degrading enzymes further enhances its antagonistic capability, facilitating direct damage to fungal structures and inhibition of conidia germination. These mechanisms are consistent with those reported in other pseudomonads used in biocontrol. Li et al. reported that P. aeruginosa strain Pa608, isolated from pepper rhizosphere, inhibited Phytophthora capsici with 88.0% efficacy in pot trials [58]. Similarly, strain CQ-40 suppressed gray mold in tomato, and strain ZL6 controlled cotton Verticillium wilt. P. aeruginosa also shows compatibility with Trichoderma spp., and their combination exhibits synergistic effects against Fusarium solani [59,60,61,62]. These studies collectively confirm that P. aeruginosa possesses broad-spectrum disease-suppressive capabilities, mediated by diverse mechanisms such as siderophore production, antibiotic synthesis (e.g., phenazine derivatives), cell wall-degrading enzyme secretion, and induction of systemic resistance. Therefore, further exploration of the multi-target antifungal functions of this bacterium holds great promise for developing integrated “one-strain-against-multiple-diseases” [63] strategies, with considerable theoretical and practical significance.

In conclusion, this study not only clarifies the pathogenic landscape of wheat FCR in Xinjiang but also offers a viable biocontrol candidate in P. aeruginosa J-7. Integrating such microbial agents with agronomic practices and resistant varieties could form a sustainable strategy for managing FCR, reducing reliance on chemical fungicides and contributing to eco-friendly agricultural practices.

The wheat rhizosphere-isolated P. aeruginosa J-7 is conspecific with the rhizosphere biocontrol strain P. aeruginosa M18 reported by Wu et al. (2011) [64], sharing prominent antifungal potential—consistent with M18’s ability to produce phenazine-1-carboxylic acid (PCA) and pyoluteorin (Plt). This confirms J-7 as an environmental isolate, analogous to M18, and provides a basis for agricultural biosafety evaluation. Wu’s comparative analysis of M18 and clinical P. aeruginosa strains (e.g., PAO1, LESB58) offers direct insights into J-7’s traits. Genetically, M18 lacks clinical strain-specific pathogenic genomic islands (e.g., PAPI-1) but harbors biocontrol-enriched accessory genomes and restriction-modification (RM) systems, while clinical strains carry complete virulence/drug-resistance gene clusters. Phenotypically, M18 exhibits attenuated pathogenicity (easily cleared in mouse models), weaker biofilm formation, and lower antibiotic resistance than clinical isolates. These characteristics are inferred to be shared by J-7, reflecting rhizosphere vs. clinical niche-driven divergence.

The agricultural biocontrol superiority of J-7 (and M18) stems from rhizosphere adaptive evolution: minimal insertion sequences (IS) and abundant CRISPR elements preserve biocontrol gene clusters; RM systems restrict exogenous pathogenic gene transfer; temperature-dependent transcription upregulates biocontrol genes at 28 °C (rhizosphere temperature) without activating virulence at 37 °C; and virulence gene degradation alongside plant-beneficial pathway enrichment enhances rhizosphere competitiveness. Key application challenges include inherent biosafety risks as a conditional pathogen, field temperature-induced biocontrol gene expression fluctuations, limited long-term colonization due to weak biofilm formation, and fungal resistance risks from reliance on a few secondary metabolites.

Future work should validate J-7’s genomic/phenotypic differences from clinical strains (following Wu’s framework), optimize temperature-stabilized formulations, and conduct long-term environmental monitoring to ensure sustainable application in wheat Fusarium crown rot control.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/microorganisms14030627/s1, Figure S1: Pathogenicity identification of class II Fusarium and class I Bipolaris; Figure S2: Morphological and molecular phylogenetic analysis of class II Fusarium and class I Bipolaris; Figure S3: Microbial diversity analysis of soil samples. (A) Dilution curve (left) Bacterial community dilution curve, (right) Fungal community dilution curve; Figure S4: Culture morphology of strain J-7; Table S1: Severity classification and symptom description of wheat crown rot at seedling stage; Table S2: Polymerase chain reaction system; Table S3: Reaction procedure of PCR amplif; Table S4: All primers used in this article; Table S5: All primers used in this article; Table S6: Occurrence of Fusarium crown rot in Yumin and Xinhe County; Table S7: Preliminary classification of fungus isolates in Fusarium crown; Table S8: Isolating frequency statistics of three pathogens; Table S9: Resistance evaluation of 30 wheat varieties to F. culmorum; Table S10: Physiological and biochemical characteristics of isolate J-7; Table S11: Annotation summary of isolate J-7. Refs. [29,65] can be found in Supplementary Materials.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, Q.L. and B.S.; methodology, C.Y. and B.Z.; experiments and all data analysis, C.Y., B.Z., Z.L., Y.D. and J.H.; writing—original draft, C.Y. and B.Z.; writing—review and editing, B.S., Z.L., Y.D., J.H. and Q.L.; funding acquisition, Q.L.; resources, J.H. and Q.L.; supervision, Q.L. and J.H. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

This study did not generate new unique reagents. They have shared my data at Genome Sequence Archive (GSA) BioProject No.: PRJCA048791, under the GSA accession number CRA032272, CRA032267, CRA037583. Lead contact: Requests for further information and resources should be directed to and will be fulfilled by the lead contact, Qinggui Lian (lianqg@shzu.edu.cn).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Funding Statement

This research was funded by the Shihezi University High-Level Talent Project (RCZK202339), the Tianchi Talents Program—Young Doctor of Xinjiang (CZ006013), the Guiding Scientific Research Project of the Xinjiang (2022ZD057), the Science and Technology Project of the Xinjiang (2024DA056).

Footnotes

Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

References

  • 1.Gazza L., Nocente F. The contribution of minor cereals to sustainable diets and agro-food biodiversity. Foods. 2023;12:3500. doi: 10.3390/foods12183500. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Melania F., Hammond-Kosack E., Solomon P. A review of wheat diseases-a field perspective. Mol. Plant Pathol. 2018;19:1523–1536. doi: 10.1111/mpp.12618. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Neupane B., Bisek B., Marais F. A diallel study to detect genetic background variation for FHB resistance in winter wheat. Sci. Rep. 2024;14:4614. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-53710-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Wearing A.H., Burgess L.W. The relative frequency of isolation of Fusaria from wheat soils in the eastern Australian wheat belt. Aust. Plant Pathol. Soc. Newsl. 1977;6:26–28. doi: 10.1071/APP9770026. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Su Y., Xu X., Wang Y., Wang T., Yu J., Yang J., Li J., Gao Y., Wang Y., Sang W., et al. Identification of genetic loci and candidate genes underlying Fusarium crown rot resistance in wheat. Theor. Appl. Genet. 2025;138:23. doi: 10.1007/s00122-025-04818-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Claude B., Paula B., Elisavet C., Francesco D., Paolo G. Pest categorisation of Fusarium pseudograminearum. EFSA J. 2022;20:e07399. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2022.7399. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Murray G.M., Brennan J.P. Estimating disease losses to the Australian wheat industry. Australas. Plant Pathol. 2009;38:558–570. doi: 10.1071/AP09053. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Hua L., Song R., Hao X., Zhang J., Liu Y., Luo J., Ren X., Li H., Wang G., Renhman S.U., et al. Manipulation of the brown glume and internode 1 gene leads to alterations in the colouration of lignified tissues, lignin content and pathogen resistance in wheat. Plant Biotechnol. J. 2025;23:1548–1564. doi: 10.1111/pbi.14604. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Li H.L., Yuan H.X., Fu B., Xing X.P., Sun B.J., Tang W.H. First report of Fusarium pseudograminearum causing crown rot of wheat in Henan, China. Plant Dis. 2012;96:1065. doi: 10.1094/PDIS-01-12-0007-PDN. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Zhang J., Zhan J., Wang J., Zhang M., Li C., Wang W., Suo Y., Song F. Population genetic analyses and trichothecene genotype profiling of Fusarium pseudograminearum causing wheat crown rot in Henan, China. J. Fungi. 2024;10:240. doi: 10.3390/jof10040240. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Xia Y., Yubo P., Singh P.K., He X., Ren Y., Zhao L., Zhang N., Cheng S., Chen F. Investigation and genome-wide association study for Fusarium crown rot resistance in Chinese common wheat. BMC Plant Biol. 2019;19:153. doi: 10.1186/s12870-019-1758-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Gao Y., Li J., Li Y., Cao W., Deng F., Niu W., Shen Y., Li Y., Li G., Gao H. Occurrence of Fusarium crown rot caused by Fusarium culmorum on winter wheat in Xinjiang uygur autonomous region, China. Plant Dis. 2024;108:3182. doi: 10.1094/PDIS-05-24-0985-PDN. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Yang M., Yii L.S., Li G.K., Li T.G., Zhang H., Gao H. First Report of Crown Rot Caused by Fusarium graminearum on Wheat in Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region, China. Plant Dis. 2024;108:1104. doi: 10.1094/PDIS-01-24-0047-PDN. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Lefan P., Farhan G., Zeng M., Wu D., Zeng Q., Han D., Li C. Source identification and genome-wide association analysis of crown rot resistance in wheat. Plants. 2022;11:1912. doi: 10.3390/plants11151912. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Alahmad S., Simpfendorfer S., Bentley A.R., Hickey L.T. Crown rot of wheat in Australia: Fusarium pseudograminearum taxonomy, population biology and disease management. Australas. Plant Pathol. 2018;47:285–299. doi: 10.1007/s13313-018-0554-z. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Bak G.R., Lee K.K., Clark I.M., Mauchline T.H., Kavamura V.N., Jee S., Lee J.T., Kim H., Lee H. Changes in the potato rhizosphere microbiota richness and diversity occur in a growth stage-dependent manner. Sci. Rep. 2025;15:2284. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-86944-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Sun T., Liu H., Wang N., Huang M., Banerjee S., Jousset A., Xu Y., Shen Q., Wang S., Wang X., et al. Interactions with native microbial keystone taxa enhance the biocontrol efficiency of Streptomyces. Microbiome. 2025;13:126. doi: 10.1186/s40168-025-02120-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Jin S., Alberti F. Advances in the discovery and study of Trichoderma natural products for biological control applications. Nat. Prod. Rep. 2025;42:1367–1386. doi: 10.1039/D5NP00017C. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Li P., Feng B., Sun Y., Yang Y. Biocontrol potential of rhizosphere Streptomyces LWT20 against postharvest decay on grape caused by Botrytis cinerea. LWT-Food Sci. Technol. 2025;232:118444. doi: 10.1016/j.lwt.2025.118444. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Li J., Song Z., Wang Y., Chen C., Jiang H., Ding T., Xie S. Root exudates mediate Bacillus velezensis FZB42’s colonization-independent biocontrol in maize. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2025;73:13618–13628. doi: 10.1021/acs.jafc.5c03726. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Zhu M., Liu J., Zhang F., Qiu Z., Zhao S. Biocontrol potential of Bacillus velezensis against the postharvest pink mold rot in Citrus reticulata and investigations on some of the mechanisms of action. Postharvest Biol. Technol. 2025;230:113799. doi: 10.1016/j.postharvbio.2025.113799. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Rupali G., Ravindran K., Meirav L.M., Sabina M., Dalia R., Ran S., Yigal E., Dana M., Maya B. Bacillus thuringiensis promotes systemic immunity in tomato, controlling pests and pathogens and promoting yield. Food Secur. 2024;16:675–690. doi: 10.1007/s12571-024-01441-4. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Xia X., Wei Q., Wu H., Chen X., Xiao C., Ye Y., Liu C., Yu H., Guo Y., Sun Y., et al. Bacillus species are core microbiota of resistant maize cultivars that induce host metabolic defense against corn stalk rot. Microbiome. 2024;12:156. doi: 10.1186/s40168-024-01887-w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Jiang N., Qiu J., Tian D., Shi H., Liu Z., Wen H., Xie S., Chen H., Wu M., Kou Y. Mixture of Bacillus amyloliquefaciens and Bacillus pumilus modulates community structures of rice rhizosphere soil to suppress rice seedling blight. Rice Sci. 2025;32:118–130. doi: 10.1016/J.RSCI.2024.09.001. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Zhang N., Wang Z., Shao J., Xu Z., Liu Y., Xun W., Miao Y., Shen Q., Zhang R. Biocontrol mechanisms of Bacillus: Improving the efficiency of green agriculture. Microb. Biotechnol. 2023;16:2250–2263. doi: 10.1111/1751-7915.14348. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Ren C., Li S., Li P., Wang Y., Yuan H., Zhao Q., Li H., Li F., Han Y. Pathogen-activated Chaetomium globosum G3 enhances iron competition and other antagonistic mechanisms to suppress maize seedling blight causal agent Fusarium verticillioides. Microbiol. Res. 2025;298:128237. doi: 10.1016/j.micres.2025.128237. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.O’Sullivan C.A., Roper M.M., Myers C.A., Thatcher L.F. Developing Actinobacterial endophytes as biocontrol products for Fusarium pseudograminearum in wheat. Front. Bioeng. Biotech. 2021;9:691770. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2021.691770. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Liu L., Jin Y., Lian H., Yin Q., Wang H. Exploring the biocontrol potential of Phanerochaete chrysosporium against wheat crown ro. J. Fungi. 2024;10:641. doi: 10.3390/jof10090641. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Martin A., Simpfendorfer S., Hare R.A., Sutherland M.W. Introgression of hexaploid sources of crown rot resistance into durum wheat. Euphytica. 2013;192:463–470. doi: 10.1007/s10681-013-0890-6. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Amelung D. Experiences with the Isolation of Plant Pathogenic Fungi. In: Dehne H., Adam G., Diekmann M., Frahm J., Mauler-Machnik A., van Halteren P., editors. Diagnosis and Identification of Plant Pathogens. Volume 11. Springer; Dordrecht, The Netherlands: 1997. pp. 35–36. [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Mitter V., Zhang M.C., Liu C.J., Ghosh M., Chakraborty S. A high-throughput glasshouse bioassay to detect crown rot resistance in wheat germplasm. Plant Pathol. 2006;55:433–441. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3059.2006.01384.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Leslie J., Summerell B. The Fusarium Laboratory Manual. Blackwell Publishing; Ames, IA, USA: 2006. Morphological Characters; pp. 111–119. [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Hyatt D., Chen G., LoCascio P.F., Land M., Larimer F.W., Hauser L.J. Prodigal: Prokaryotic gene recognition and translation initiation site identification. BMC Bioinform. 2010;11:19. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-11-119. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Besemer J., Borodovsky M. GeneMark: Web software for gene finding in prokaryotes, eukaryotes and viruses. Nucleic Acids Res. 2005;33:W451–W454. doi: 10.1093/nar/gki487. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Chan P.P., Lowe T.M. Gene Prediction. Springer; Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany: 1962. tRNAscan-SE: Searching for tRNA Genes in Genomic Sequences; pp. 1–14. Methods in molecular biology. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Pu L., Jin Q., Cai X., Qu C., Zhang J., Bai X., Gao J., Kang Z., Gao J. Crown rot in wheat: Pathogen biology, host responses, and management strategies. Stress Biol. 2025;5:52. doi: 10.1007/s44154-025-00247-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Bozoğlu T., Derviş S., Imren M., Amer M., Özdemir F., Paulitz T.C., Morgounov A., Dababat A.A., Öze.r G. Fungal pathogens associated with crown and root rot of wheat in central, eastern, and southeastern Kazakhstan. J. Fungi. 2022;8:417. doi: 10.3390/jof8050417. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Özer G., Erper İ., Yıldız Ş., Bozoğlu T., Zholdoshbekova S., Alkan M., Tekin F., Uulu T.E., İmren M., Dababat A.A., et al. Fungal pathogens associated with crown and root rot in wheat-growing areas of northern Kyrgyzstan. J. Fungi. 2023;9:124. doi: 10.3390/jof9010124. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Zhao X., Hou D., Xu J., Wang K., Hu Z. Antagonistic activity of fungal strains against Fusarium crown rot. Plants. 2022;11:255. doi: 10.3390/plants11030255. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Xu W., Yang Q., Xie X., Goodwin P.H., Deng X., Zhang J., Sun R., Wang Q., Xia M., Wu C., et al. Genomic and phenotypic insights into the potential of Bacillus subtilis YB-15 isolated from rhizosphere to biocontrol against crown rot and promote growth of wheat. Biology. 2022;11:778. doi: 10.3390/biology11050778. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Jamila B., Hugh W., Mohammed B., Mustapha L., Llyass M., Fatiha B. Evaluation of durum wheat genotypes for resistance against root rot disease caused by Moroccan Fusarium culmorum isolates. Plant Pathol. J. 2022;38:11. doi: 10.5423/ppj.oa.09.2021.0137. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Jagdeep S., Bhavit C., Ali R., Yang S., Sandhu S. Important wheat diseases in the US and their management in the 21st century. Front. Plant Sci. 2023;13:1010191. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2022.1010191. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Vandicke J., Visschere D.K., Croubels S., Saeger S.D., Audenaert K., Haesaert G. Mycotoxins in Flanders’fields: Occurrence and correlations with Fusarium species in whole-plant harvested maize. Microorganism. 2019;7:571. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms7110571. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Birr T., Hasler M., Verreet J., Klink H. Composition and predominance of Fusarium species causing Fusarium head blight in winter wheat grain depending on cultivar susceptibility and meteorological factors. Microorganisms. 2020;8:617. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms8040617. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Andrew M., Brad B., Steven S., Herdina, Daniele G.D., Yang N., Beverly O., Ben O. Improved quantification of Fusarium pseudograminearum (Fusarium crown rot) using qPCR measurement of infection in multi-species winter cereal experiments. Front. Plant Sci. 2023;14:1225283. doi: 10.3389/FPLS.2023.1225283. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Zhuo H., He X., Wang S., Ma Q., Sun B., Ding S., Chen L., Zhang M., Li H. Diversity of the Fusarium pathogens associated with crown rot in the Huanghuai wheat-growing region of China. Environ. Microbiol. 2019;21:2740–2754. doi: 10.1111/1462-2920.14602. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Deng Y., Li W., Zhang P., Sun H., Zhang X., Zhang A., Chen H. Fusarium pseudograminearum as an emerging pathogen of crown rot of wheat in eastern China. Plant Pathol. 2020;69:240–248. doi: 10.1111/ppa.13122. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Ji L., Li Q., Wang Y., Burgess L.W., Sun M., Cao K., Kong L. Monitoring of Fusarium species and trichothecene genotypes associated with Fusarium head blight on wheat in hebei province, China. Toxins. 2019;11:243. doi: 10.3390/toxins11050243. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Abdallah-Nekache N., Laraba I., Ducos C., Barreau C., Bouznad Z., Boureghda H. Occurrence of Fusarium head blight and Fusarium crown rot in Algerian wheat: Identification of associated species and assessment of aggressiveness. Eur. J. Plant Pathol. 2019;154:499–512. doi: 10.1007/s10658-019-01673-7. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Bennacer A., Halouane F.S., Alvarez M., Oukali Z., Bennacer N.E.H., Foughalia A., Delgado J. Talaromyces pinophilus strain HD25G2 as a novel biocontrol agent of Fusarium culmorum, the causal agent of root and crown rot of soft wheat. J. Fungi. 2025;11:588. doi: 10.3390/jof11080588. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Mahbubur R.M., Philip D., Urmil B., Raj P., Matthew H., Richard T. Relationship between resistance and tolerance of crown rot in bread wheat. Field Crop. Res. 2021;265:108106. doi: 10.1016/j.fcr.2021.108106. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Rahman M., Davies P., Bansal U., Pasam R., Hayden M., Trethowan R. Marker-assisted recurrent selection improves the crown rot resistance of bread wheat. Mol. Breed. 2020;40:28. doi: 10.1007/s11032-020-1105-1. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Martin A., Bovill W.D., Percy C.D., Herde D., Fletcher S., Kelly A., Neate S.M., Sutherland M.W. Markers for seedling and adult plant crown rot resistance in four partially resistant bread wheat sources. Theor. Appl. Genet. 2015;128:377–385. doi: 10.1007/s00122-014-2437-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Hossain M.S., Sharna A.A., Sharmin S., Tusty T.A., Hashem A., Sarker P.K. Exploring the antibacterial potential of environmental Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates: Insights from in vitro studies and genome mining approaches. J. Genet. Eng. Biotechnol. 2025;23:100508. doi: 10.1016/j.jgeb.2025.100508. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Vasquez-Rifo A., Ricci E.P., Ambros V. Pseudomonas aeruginosa cleaves the decoding center of Caenorhabditis elegans ribosomes. PLoS Biol. 2020;18:e3000969. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3000969. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Haripriyan J., Binu C.R., Menon N.D., Vanuopadath M., Hari M.B., Namitha N., Binoy K., Kumar A., Nair B.G., Nizet V., et al. Essential oils modulate virulence phenotypes in a multidrug-resistant pyomelanogenic Pseudomonas aeruginosa clinical isolate. Sci. Rep. 2025;15:3738. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-86515-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Phelan V.V., Fang J., Dorrestein P.C. Mass spectrometry analysis of Pseudomonas aeruginosa treated with azithromycin. J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom. 2015;26:873–877. doi: 10.1007/s13361-015-1101-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Li C., Gao X., Huo Y., Asseri T.A.Y., Tian X., Luo K. Evaluation of biocontrol efficacy of rhizosphere Pseudomonas aeruginosa for management of Phytophthora capsici of pepper. PLoS ONE. 2024;19:e309705. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0309705. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Wang X., Zhou X., Cai Z., Guo L., Chen X., Chen X., Liu J., Feng M., Qiu Y., Zhang Y., et al. A Biocontrol Strain of Pseudomonas aeruginosa CQ-40 Promote Growth and Control Botrytis cinerea in Tomato. Pathogens. 2021;10:22. doi: 10.3390/pathogens10010022. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Jatan R., Kamboj R., Kumar M., Nitin K., Priyanka J., Charu L., Joshitha V., Vandana R., Kumar S.N., Singh B.D. Isolation and whole genome sequencing of Pseudomonas aeruginosa strain RK1 and its biocontrol potential against phytopathogens of rice. Biologia. 2023;78:2357–2369. doi: 10.1007/s11756-023-01406-6. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Niu Q., Lei S., Zhang G., Wu G., Zhuo T., Chen K., Lin Z. Inhibition of Verticillium wilt in cotton through the application of Pseudomonas aeruginosa ZL6 derived from fermentation residue of kitchen waste. J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2024;34:10–11. doi: 10.4014/jmb.2401.01022. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Alemayehu D., Tesfaye A., Yitbarek W. In-vitro compatibility assay of indigenous Trichoderma and Pseudomonas species and their antagonistic activities against black root rot disease (Fusarium solani) of faba bean (Vicia faba L.) BMC Microbiol. 2021;21:115. doi: 10.1186/s12866-021-02181-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Wang R., Wang C., Zuo B., Liang X., Zhang D., Liu R., Yang L.N., Lu B.H., Wang X., Gao J. A novel biocontrol strain Bacillus amyloliquefaciens FS6 for excellent control of gray mold and seedling diseases of ginseng. Plant Dis. 2021;105:1926–1935. doi: 10.1094/PDIS-07-20-1593-RE. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Wu D.Q., Ye J., Ou H.Y., Wei X., Huang X., He Y.W., Xu Y. Genomic analysis and temperature-dependent transcriptome profiles of the rhizosphere originating strain Pseudomonas aeruginosa M18. BMC Genom. 2011;12:438. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-12-438. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Zhuang X. Resistance Identification and Resistance Gene Analysis of Main and New Wheat Varieties to Stem Base Rot in Huanghuai Wheat Area. Henan Agricultural University; Zhengzhou, China: 2023. [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Data Availability Statement

This study did not generate new unique reagents. They have shared my data at Genome Sequence Archive (GSA) BioProject No.: PRJCA048791, under the GSA accession number CRA032272, CRA032267, CRA037583. Lead contact: Requests for further information and resources should be directed to and will be fulfilled by the lead contact, Qinggui Lian (lianqg@shzu.edu.cn).


Articles from Microorganisms are provided here courtesy of Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI)

RESOURCES