Skip to main content
The Journal of Infectious Diseases logoLink to The Journal of Infectious Diseases
. 2024 Sep 10;230(Suppl 2):S150–S164. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jiae328

Sensory Dysfunction, Microbial Infections, and Host Responses in Alzheimer's Disease

Praveen Bathini 1,2,, Emanuele Brai 3, Brian J Balin 4,5,6, Lynn Bimler 7, David B Corry 8,9,10,11, Davangere P Devanand 12,13, Richard L Doty 14,15, Garth D Ehrlich 16,17, William A Eimer 18,19,20,21, Tamas Fulop 22,23, David L Hahn 24,25, Christine J Hammond 26,27, Joseph Infanti 28,29, Ruth Itzhaki 30,31, Richard Lathe 32,33, Christopher Scott Little 34,35, Rima McLeod 36,37, Shima T Moein 38,39, Amy R Nelson 40, George Perry 41,42,43, Or A Shemesh 44,45,46,47, Rudolph E Tanzi 48,49,50,51, Wilmore C Webley 52,53,54, Nikki M Schultek 55,56,, Lavinia Alberi Auber 57,58,59,60,61,62,
PMCID: PMC13032003  PMID: 39255393

Abstract

Sensory functions of organs of the head and neck allow humans to interact with the environment and establish social bonds. With aging, smell, taste, vision, and hearing decline. Evidence suggests that accelerated impairment in sensory abilities can reflect a shift from healthy to pathological aging, including the development of Alzheimer's disease (AD) and other neurological disorders. While the drivers of early sensory alteration in AD are not elucidated, insults such as trauma and infections can affect sensory function. Herein, we review the involvement of the major head and neck sensory systems in AD, with emphasis on microbes exploiting sensory pathways to enter the brain (the “gateway” hypothesis) and the potential feedback loop by which sensory function may be impacted by central nervous system infection. We emphasize detection of sensory changes as first-line surveillance in senior adults to identify and remove potential insults, like microbial infections, that could precipitate brain pathology.

Keywords: sensory dysfunction, host-pathogen interaction, Alzheimer’s disease, microbes, parasites


Alzheimer's disease (AD), the most prevalent form of dementia, is a progressive neurodegenerative disorder that affects millions of individuals worldwide [1]. Late-onset or sporadic AD is primarily linked to aging and partially penetrant genetic factors, representing the majority of AD cases. Among the most common AD-related symptoms there are memory loss, altered behavior, and personality changes, but diagnosis of cognitive and executive symptoms often occurs in later stages when irreversible processes commence [2]. Numerous works have shown the presence of amyloid β (Aβ) and tau pathology in the peripheral and central sensory-motor domains (smell, vision, hearing, balance) of AD patients. During their exploratory workshop, the National Institute of Aging emphasized the necessity for interventions aimed at addressing sensory-motor deficits to improve patient function in the context of aging and AD [3]. Despite studies indicating that sensory dysfunction precedes cognitive decline, the mechanistic relationship between sensory and cognitive deficits is primarily observational and correlative. While research on the clinical relevance of vision and hearing in AD is still emerging, chemosensory impairment, particularly loss of smell, is well-established in the progression of AD [4].

We posit here that one potential contributor to AD pathobiology is microbial infection. Neurotropic pathogens, including bacteria, amoebae, fungi, and viruses, can invade the central nervous system (CNS) and may exploit these sensory nerves as a route of infection. For instance, Treponema pallidum, the agent of syphilis, as well as Cryptococcus neoformans, measles virus, and human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) have been associated with dementing illnesses, including “reversible dementias” that remit with tailored antimicrobial therapy [5]. Evidence for direct brain infection in AD has been demonstrated for herpes simplex virus 1 (HSV-1) [6, 7], Borrelia burgdorferi [8], and Chlamydia pneumoniae [9]. Systemic analysis indicates that parasitic infections such as Toxoplasma gondii may impact neurodevelopment, immune response, and endocrine networks, providing insights into potential connections with epilepsy, movement disorders, and Alzheimer's dementia [10]. Helicobacter pylori, the agent of gastric ulcers, and periodontal pathogens in the oral cavity like Porphyromonas gingivalis, an agent of periodontitis, have been studied in late-onset AD [11, 12]. Both Alzheimer's and Parkinson's diseases (PD) have been associated with changes in microbial composition. Such dysbiosis has been implicated in the nasal, oral, and gut microbiome. For example in PD, the deep nasal sinus cavity microbiome revealed an increased relative abundance of proinflammatory bacteria like Moraxella catarrhalis with a positive correlation for an increase in clinical features [13]. The study from Bathini et al revealed stage-specific changes in the salivary microbial composition, with a decrease in periodontal pathogens like Filifactor villosus with the progression of dementia and an increase in oral opportunistic pathogen like Leptotrichia wadei, in patients with mild cognitive impairment [14].

Considering causes that may drive the accumulation of amyloid and tau in AD, infectious insults are significant and logical choices. Organisms likely to be involved in AD are those that can evade host defenses, gain entry to specific selectively vulnerable brain regions (such as through chemosensory systems), and establish chronic, persistent, latent, or relapsing infection. Infection may be the central hub that connects AD risk factors to the pathogenesis of the disease. Microbial linkage to AD risk factors has been established with APOE-ε4 genotype, chronic neuroinflammation, autoimmune mechanisms, oxidative and mitochondrial damage, cardiovascular disease, diabetes with insulin resistance, trauma to the blood-brain barrier (BBB), and selectively vulnerable brain insult [15]. Chronic infections and persistent reactivation may be an overarching unifying hypothesis for sporadic late-onset AD. Host immune defenses against common microbial infections vary, thus impacting infectivity. This may explain why certain ubiquitous microbes cause disease in certain individuals but merely colonize others [16].

While the central nervous system is safeguarded from many circulating microorganisms by barriers, like the BBB, specific peripheral sensory systems, such as the nose and olfactory bulb are directly vulnerable to external agents, including microbes. The sensory organ for hearing, the ear, is equipped with a barrier known as the blood-labyrinthine barrier, but it also has resident immune cells and can be susceptible to infections that may affect the CNS [17]. The eye, a unique sensory organ with its own immune system, has direct contact with the external environment with the cornea and the conjunctiva acting as barriers. Regardless, certain infections can impair the eye and have the potential to impact the CNS under specific circumstances. Ongoing research aims to understand the extent to which these sensory organs may serve as portals for microbes to enter the brain and any relevance to neurodegenerative diseases like AD. Despite the brain being protected by the BBB, microbes may enter through the bloodstream, neural pathways, intranasal route, sinuses, the oral cavity, and gut-brain axis. This review highlights the potential role of selected sensory organs as gateways for entry of infections relevant to AD development (Figure 1), the so-called gateway hypothesis.

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Sensory changes early on in dementia. Known pathogenic risk factors, genetics of the host (red), route of pathogen escape (black dotted arrows) into the central nervous system, and types of deficits manifested in the early phases of Alzheimer's disease. Abbreviations: CP, cribriform plate; HHV, human herpesvirus; HSV-1, herpes simplex virus 1; OE, olfactory epithelium; OSN, olfactory sensory neuron; TG, trigeminal nerve. Created on BioRender.

THE SENSORY PATHWAYS IN ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE

Olfactory Dysfunction in AD

The olfactory bulb, critical for odor processing, is characterized by pathological protein accumulation and volume changes contributing to olfactory dysfunction in neurodegenerative dementia [18, 19]. Early onset of olfactory dysfunction is a prominent feature in various dementia types, characterized by remarkably high prevalence rates, such as nearly 100% in AD, 90% in PD dementia, 96% in frontotemporal lobar dementia, and 15% in vascular dementia [20]. Recognized as an early marker for various neurological conditions, olfactory impairment collectively underscores the initial involvement of olfactory structures in PD, AD, Lewy body dementia, Huntington's disease, and, to some extent, Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease [21]. In contrast, frontotemporal dementia manifests later in olfactory network engagement [22]. Postmortem studies reveal early pathological changes in AD, impacting olfactory processing regions like the entorhinal and transentorhinal areas, anterior olfactory nucleus, and olfactory bulb [23]. In normal aging after 70 years old, olfactory deficits are accelerated with a reduction of the olfactory bulb volume. In AD, olfactory bulb atrophy occurs independently of age, inversely correlating with disease duration, with accumulation of amyloid and tau protein in olfactory regions. In synucleinopathies, abnormal α-synuclein or Lewy bodies accumulate in the olfactory bulb and projection areas, progressing along the olfactory pathway to other brain regions [24]. Importantly, significant correlations exist between odor identification test scores obtained before death in nondemented older persons and postmortem measures of plaques and tangles in multiple brain regions implicated in AD, including the entorhinal cortex. This, along with similar associations between test scores and volume losses in the amygdala, entorhinal cortex, and perirhinal cortices, strongly suggests olfactory dysfunction as a sign of incipient AD.

The nose serves both respiratory and olfactory functions and the nasal cavity contains specialized regions for each activity. The olfactory epithelium is crucial for our sense of smell and is vulnerable to various factors that can affect its integrity. The olfactory epithelium receives sensory input from the olfactory sensory neurons, the trigeminal nerve, and nervus terminalis, creating a potential route for microbial species to reach the brain and drive neuroinflammatory responses associated with dementia [25]. Additionally, the olfactory epithelium's sustentacular cells protect the olfactory sensory neurons, and their renewal can be affected by factors like head trauma or microbial infection [26]. Olfactory receptor cells play an important role in facilitating the transneuronal entry of viral species (retrograde transport of viruses to the brain), metals, and other xenobiotics into the olfactory bulb and interconnected brain regions [27, 28]. Imbalances in excitatory-inhibitory networks can further impact olfactory function in AD [29, 30]. The olfactory tract, which connects the olfactory bulb to higher olfactory areas, can undergo structural changes with age or neurodegenerative conditions [19, 31]. In humans, the regenerative capacity of the olfactory neuroepithelium decreases with age; this scenario is common in patients with chronic rhinosinusitis, who often exhibit structural and functional alterations in their neuroepithelium [32]. Chronic rhinosinusitis has been identified as a potential risk factor for the development of AD [33]. In summary, the complexity and integrity of the olfactory system can be influenced by various causes, especially microbial infections, that contribute to changes in smell perception and potentially play a role in neurodegenerative diseases.

Microbes in the Olfactory Route and Brain

The nasal cavity harbors a diverse microbiome, and some of these microorganisms can reach the CNS via the olfactory pathway or act directly (Figure 1). The colonization of the olfactory neuroepithelium by microorganisms appears to be instrumental in the development and the function of the olfactory circuit as demonstrated by the altered kinetics of odorant responses and odorant signal transduction in germ-free mice [34]. The olfactory vector hypothesis [27] emphasizes the fact that the olfactory receptor cells and associated perineural spaces provide a direct pathway for the brain invasion of such microbiota, xenobiotics, nanoparticles, and toxins. Entrance can be rapid because no intervening synapse is present and the BBB is bypassed. Certain microbial species, including Herpesviridae [6, 7], spirochetes [35], and C. pneumoniae [9], have been detected in the olfactory nerve and related limbic structures, probably indicating gateway of the microbes into the brain through these sensory structures. Interestingly, pathogens trigger Aβ deposition, which exerts a protective role in entrapping microbial cells, proposing a potential link between viral infection and AD pathology [36]. This suggests that pathogens infecting the respiratory tract can access the brain via the nasal cavity, causing neuroinflammation and stimulating the generation and dispersion of amyloid species for antimicrobial activity [37]. Below we present pathogens that may enter the CNS through the olfactory route.

Viruses

Herpesviridae infections are highly prevalent: HSV-1, the virus most frequently linked to AD, is detected in over 80% of the population in some countries but its prevalence is lower in countries of higher socioeconomic levels [38, 39]. After infection, HSV-1 remains chronically latent in sensory ganglia for life, periodically reactivating during conditions of stress or immune deficit, and causing symptomatic infection—cold sores (herpes labialis) in only 25%–40% of those infected. In 1991, HSV-1 was discovered in the brain (frontal and temporal cortices) at high prevalence in elderly humans—both AD patients and aged controls—using polymerase chain reaction (PCR) [40, 41]. This was the first definitive detection of a pathogen in nondiseased “sterile” human tissue. Subsequently, it was found that in some 60% of cases, HSV-1 in the brain of APOE-ɛ4 carriers conferred a risk of AD, and consistently that APOE-ɛ4 carriage was also a risk for cold sores [6, 7].

The presence of HSV-1 in the brain of younger people is rare, suggesting that the virus reaches the brain with aging and the decline of the immune system. This may be from the ganglia or from entry as a new infection via the olfactory route, remaining latent until reactivated. Reactivation can be caused via direct viral damage and inflammation, and repeated reactivations could lead to the development of neuropathological processes like AD. This was supported by later findings that AD-like phenotypes developed after HSV-1 infection of a 3-dimensional brain cell model [42], and in brains of HSV-1–infected mice after repeated reactivation of the virus by hyperthermia [43].

HSV-1 infection of cultured cells caused accumulation of Aβ and phosphorylated tau (pTau). In AD brains, in situ PCR showed HSV-1 to colocalize within amyloid plaques [44] and induce activation of microglia cells through Toll-like receptors (TLRs) [45]. Later studies indicated that Aβ acts by engaging the virus [37], supporting previous suggestions that it might be protective against neurotoxins [46, 47].

The possible clinical relevance of these findings was indicated by cellular studies showing that antivirals reduce Aβ and pTau accumulation [48]. Also, antiherpetic treatment of patients with severe HSV infection reduced their risk of dementia [49]. In fact, 500 studies using a variety of approaches, including genome-wide association studies and epidemiological approaches, support a major role for HSV-1 in AD. An association between HSV-1 systemic infection and cognitive decline was shown using serologic data in epidemiologic studies [50].

Many infections, including severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), cause the reactivation of latent herpesviruses [51]. They also increase the risk of AD, while vaccination against shingles and other infections lessens the risk [52]. In the 3-dimensional brain model, varicella-zoster virus infection reactivates quiescent HSV-1 [53], supporting the suggestion that repeated HSV-1 reactivation in the brain, caused by infections and other insults such as inflammation, stress, axonal damage, and immunosuppression, may lead to AD.

Human herpesvirus 6 (HHV-6) infects almost 100% of humans in infancy and has been detected in the same brain regions as HSV-1 [40, 54]. Infection of olfactory-ensheathing cells surrounding the olfactory nerve layer with HHV-6A or HHV-6B revealed productive infection and an inflammatory response only after HHV-6A infection [55]. However, the causative role of HHV-6A or HHV-6B in AD pathogenesis is yet to be established.

As a result of the recent pandemic, SARS-CoV-2 has been identified as one of the pathogens with distinctive tropism for the olfactory organ, causing hyposmia or dysosmia in 20%–70% of acute cases and “long-haulers” [56]. It was demonstrated that infection of sustentacular cells by SARS-CoV-2 can dampen the conduction of olfactory sensory neurons reducing olfactory acuity and perception, and likely gaining access to the brain through the olfactory bulb [57]. While brains from subjects that developed SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia showed the presence of the SARS-CoV-2 in the olfactory region [58], it is at present unclear whether this also happens in mild and long-COVID cases. However, recent research has indicated that cognitive symptoms persist 2 years following severe SARS-CoV-2 infection [59]. This could indicate that limbic and cortical regions have been invaded via the olfactory route, contributing to the memory sequelae.

Bacteria

Significant findings from various studies reveal that C. pneumoniae is associated with AD [9, 60]. C. pneumoniae was detected in 90% of postmortem AD brains (17/19) in the original 1998 report, with only 5% of non-AD brains from identical brain regions testing positive (1/19) using PCR for DNA, electron and immunoelectron microscopy, reverse transcription PCR for RNA, immunohistochemistry, and culturing. In a comparable study, C. pneumoniae was found by PCR in 20 of 25 AD brains and in only 3 of 27 controls [60]. C. pneumoniae is an obligate intracellular gram-negative bacterium. While it has been most often associated with acute respiratory infection and as an etiologic agent of community-acquired atypical pneumonia, it has also been associated with various chronic, autoimmune diseases, although in most individuals infection with C. pneumoniae is a mild and self-limiting infection. This bacterium can attach to nasal- and neuroepithelium and potentially access the brain via the olfactory bulb [9]. Studies in Balb/c mice confirm the intranasal spread of C. pneumoniae to the brain by showing the presence of its antigens and increase in amyloid plaque load [61]. Also, injury to the nasal epithelium leads to an enhanced spread of C. pneumoniae bacterial load into the peripheral nerves and olfactory bulb with Aβ deposition [62]. Furthermore, the load of C. pneumoniae in the AD brain varies with the APOE genotype, with APOE-ε4 carriers having higher C. pneumoniae copy numbers than either APOE-ε2 or APOE-ε3 [16]. Chlamydial lipopolysaccharides and membrane proteins can induce the secretion of proinflammatory cytokines and reactive oxygen species from astrocytes, contributing to neurotoxicity [63].

Spirochetes like B. burgdorferi and T. pallidum are also implicated in AD. They can trigger latent or persistent infections and have neurotrophic properties that enable them to reach the brain through various routes, including the olfactory tract [64, 65]. A meta-analysis suggests a significantly higher odds ratio for identifying spirochetes in AD brains or cerebrospinal fluid compared to controls [64, 65]. B. burgdorferi has been cultivated from postmortem AD brains [66] and DNA traces have been detected in brains, blood serum, and cerebrospinal fluid of AD patients [65]. Borrelia antigens are associated with neuritic plaques, especially in the olfactory tract, and appear to trigger amyloidogenesis and neuroinflammation [35]. In Lyme disease, B. burgdorferi frequently coinfects with other pathogens, for example, C. pneumoniae and herpes viruses [67, 68]. Spirochetes, via their surface lipoproteins, activate TLR signaling. In AD, there is an increased expression of pattern recognition receptors in the brain. Notably, polymorphisms in the TLR2 and TLR4 genes play a role in influencing the pathology of the disease. This underscores the impact of TLR polymorphisms on the susceptibility to the progression of sporadic AD [64, 65].

Fungi

Using antibodies developed against fungi, postmortem immunohistochemical studies of human AD brains have indicated that a variety of filamentous or irregular structures found intra- and extracellularly are fungal [69–71]. Additional analyses of brain and blood using metagenomic approaches and more sophisticated histology supported a possible link between disseminated fungal infection, AD, and cerebral mycosis, while also revealing that both bacteria and fungi were coinfecting AD brains [72–75]. Candida albicans is uniquely capable of infiltrating and disrupting key CNS-based sensory pathways. The nasal passages and paranasal sinuses are frequently infected with C. albicans [76], where proximal olfactory neurons could provide a route for the migration of fungal cells across the BBB directly into the olfactory bulbs and nearby entorhinal cortex and hippocampus.

Parallel analyses of human and mouse brains and experimental models of cerebral mycosis further support these neuropathological investigations. More recently, C. albicans was shown to cross the BBB of mice readily, induce senile-plaque-like Aβ aggregates that are generated from the cleavage of the amyloid precursor protein by fungal proteinases and induce transient memory loss during the time of infection [77–79]. The nearly ubiquitous presence of C. albicans within human populations points to this singularly common and pathogenic fungus as a potentially common microbial contributor to AD-related neurodegeneration and memory loss [80]. Further investigation is warranted to clarify mechanistic interactions between associated fungi, the sensory organs, and the development of AD pathology.

Protozoa

T. gondii is present in the brain of over 2 billion people worldwide across their lifetimes, as an incurable, chronic potentially active infection. There is considerable evidence that T. gondii infection can contribute to the initiation and progression of neurodegeneration [81]. Whether and when this occurs is influenced by human host and parasite genetics, environmental factors, and immune response. These factors determine outcomes at various times from fetal life to older ages. Mechanistically, Toxoplasma can modulate signature transcriptional pathways of neurodegeneration, including AD, tauopathies, amyloidosis, PD, epilepsy, and certain tumors [10]. Nuclear factor-κB (NF-κB) is central in this process [10], and this infection appears to affect the expression of genes critical for the development of AD [82]. Modulation of transcription occurred with the chronic dormant form in cultured human primary brain neuronal stem cells [83, 84], and also with the active form of the parasite and in mice [85]. In addition, STRING (search tool for recurring instances of neighbouring genes) analysis [86, 87] shows evidence for protein-protein interaction networks pertinent to smell in cultures infected with types I, II, or III parasites, identified as odorant receptor cluster 5 [10].

Interestingly, T. gondii modulates smell in mice and nonhuman primates [88–90]. This is beneficial for perpetuation of the parasite life cycle because attracting prey animals to predatory species such as feline definitive hosts of Toxoplasma leads to production of oocysts that can widely contaminate the environment.

These observations suggest another possible mechanism for odor attraction and indicate a central odorant node. There is some evidence reporting that this mechanism might occur in humans [91]. Studies of associations of Toxoplasma infection with human smell and AD have not been reported. The active infection is treatable and if eradication at dormant stages is successful then treatment trials investigating this potentially curable chronic infectious cause for damage to the brain and eye could be performed.

Host-Pathogen Interaction in Olfactory Deficit

Host susceptibility to infection is influenced by genetics, age, immune status, diet, infectious agent's dose, and virulence, with pathogens employing intricate strategies such as immune evasion to reach the immune-privileged brain (Figure 2). Also, sensory neurons innervating the local mucosal barriers can sense the mucosal environment, including the nutrients and microbial products, and stimulate the recruitment of local mucosal immune cells and release of cytokines, further activating the sensory neurons. This bidirectional communication could modulate mucosal inflammation and immunity [92]. APOE-ε4, CLU (clusterin), TREM2 (triggering receptor expressed on myeloid cells 2), and CD33 (cluster of differentiation 33) play important roles in innate immunity and are genetic risks for sporadic AD. TREM2 binds to lipoproteins and apolipoproteins including clusterin and ApoE4, enabling uptake of Aβ by microglia. Genetic variants or mutations in these genes can disrupt the binding of lipoproteins and Aβ lipoproteins complex formation and therefore cause defective clearance by microglia. CD33 expressed on microglial cells modulates innate immune response by binding to the sialic acid residues on the microbes, thereby regulating microglial activation [93, 94]. Importantly, the viral life cycle is modulated differently by various apoE isoforms with apoEe4 having an increased risk for HSV-1 and HIV infection and protection for hepatitis C virus. The lethality of the APOE 133–150 peptide extends to various gram-positive bacteria, including Staphylococcus aureus and Bacillus subtilis, as well as gram-negative bacteria such as Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Escherichia coli, and Klebsiella pneumoniae [95]. Individuals with APOE-ε4 allele often exhibit early olfactory identification errors and olfactory memory deficits, along with a higher risk of developing AD [96].

Figure 2.

Figure 2.

Risk factors for dementia with potential mechanism of microbiome entry into the brain via sensory neurons directly to the brain or through the damaged blood-brain barrier. Although many risk factors are associated, host genetics and dietary habits collectively influence microbial dysbiosis, leading to an imbalance in microbial composition and inflammatory signals promoting inflammation and a compromised barrier function. Viruses in particular are neurotrophic, can remain dormant for years, and undergo activation upon host stress. Antimicrobial peptide amyloid β (Aβ) is produced in response to microbial entry into the brain, and a phase of cytokine and immune cell recruitment leads to local inflammatory conditions and neuroinflammation followed by Alzheimer's disease pathology. Created on BioRender.

Together, these studies indicate that over a lifetime, during recurrent bacterial and viral infections, microbial pathogens exploit the nasal route to colonize the brain during asymptomatic phases that may contribute to neurocognitive decline later in life. This depends on the individual virulence of the pathogen as well as the host genetic vulnerability to progressive neuropathological changes of dementia. In summary, the progressive pathogenesis of AD is multifactorial, involving aging, a more permeable or disrupted BBB, a dystrophic olfactory neuroepithelium, microbial infection, and chronic inflammation [15].

Visual Dysfunction in AD

Vision is impacted in various dementias including AD, Lewy body dementia, and posterior cortical atrophy, a visual variant of AD. While in Lewy body dementia higher visual functions are affected, both lower and higher visual deficits are associated with posterior cortical atrophy [97]. In AD, early manifestation of the pathology can be observed in the pupil, lens (Aβ in the lens), retina, and optic nerve leading to visual deficiencies, including abnormalities in visual acuity, contrast sensitivity, color vision, and visual field loss [98, 99].

The eye provides a natural window to the brain for the acquisition of visual information with its retinal layer considered a part of the central nervous system (Figure 1). Many years prior to the development of cognitive impairment and AD it is reported that there are changes in the peripheral retinal vasculature identifiable by optical coherence tomography angiography that predicts the development of AD [100]. People with dementia can experience altered vision [101] and understanding these visual deficits in early stages is of potential interest in the diagnosis of AD [102]. Imaging studies show early changes in the posterior cortical regions, including the occipital cortex, and pathological examination confirms initial changes in the medial temporal lobe with a gradual increase of pathological hallmarks in neocortical regions. Interestingly, previous reports show extracerebral accumulation of Aβ in the eye with increased accumulation of Aβ 1–40 and Aβ 1–42 peptides in the lens (supranuclear lens fiber cells) and primary aqueous humor [103] with the progression of AD. Accumulation of amyloid plaques in the retinal layer was earlier reported in human AD specimens [99]. Aβ can coaggregate with αβ-crystallin, a cytosolic lens protein that has a structural function assisting in the proper maintenance of lenticular refractive index. Irregularities and discontinuities seen in the refractive index and local light scattering in the ocular system of AD patients may be due to Aβ aggregating in the supranuclear lens fiber cells [104]. Indeed, in the early stages of the disease, accumulation of Aβ is not limited to fiber cells alone but is also observed in retinal ganglion cells and retinal nerve fiber layers [105], along with pTau protein [106] in these retinal structures. Overall, evidence of Aβ deposits in the retina supports the development of noninvasive eye biomarkers for the clinical diagnosis of AD [105].

Sensory information from the retinal layer of the eye is relayed to the higher brain structures through the cranial nerve II (optic nerve) (Figure 1). In the early stages of AD, axonal degeneration of this nerve may contribute to vision impairments. As evident in moderate and severe pathological AD stages, the optic nerve undergoes neurodegeneration (optic neuropathy) and displays a decrease in its diameter [107, 108]. In other neurodegenerative diseases, like PD, such visual disturbances also correlate with the pathology progression [109]. Optic disc analysis using blue-light high-resolution photography reveals optic nerve damage, increased pallor area to the disc area, cup-to-disc ratio, cup volume, and a reduced disc rim area. Interestingly, in a study conducted to examine the optic nerve head in AD patients, a higher AD assessment score correlates with increased pallor to disc area [110]. Assessing the optic nerve in early stages of AD could therefore be advised to study the progression of the disease.

Microbiome and Host-Pathogen Interactions in the Visual System

Similar to the nasal system, the eye can be considered a conduit to the brain. T. gondii infection is the most common cause of infection in the back of the eye (choroid, retina) worldwide [10]. In addition, C. albicans, presumably blood-borne, is one of the most common causes of endophthalmitis [111], which can include retinitis [112]. In ophthalmic disorders like diabetic retinopathy, age-related macular degeneration (AMD), and glaucoma, the eye displays AD-like pathological features, including Aβ deposition, neurodegeneration, and vascular damage, comparable to the CNS [113]. Recent evidence document the increased risk of dementia associated with ocular disorders, as highlighted by a longitudinal study involving 3877 APOE-ε4–positive patients with AMD, diabetic retinopathy, and recent glaucoma, which reported a 40% to 50% higher likelihood of developing AD compared to subjects without these pathologies; notably, cataract did not represent a risk factor for AD [114].

AMD has also been associated with C. pneumoniae in both past systemic and current chronic eye infections. Kalayoglu et al were the first to report, in a case-control study, a serological association between C. pneumoniae and AMD [115]. An association of AMD and C. pneumoniae serology was confirmed in a second case-control study [116] and a cohort series of 233 individuals followed for AMD progression over a mean period of 7 years. The risk of progression was greatly increased to almost 12-fold (odds ratio, 11.8; 95% confidence interval, 2.1–65.8) when, in addition to having an AMD risk allele, subjects also were in the upper tertile of C. pneumoniae antibody level [117]. In a mouse model, early-life peripheral C. pneumoniae infection reprogrammed retinal microglia and aggravated neovascular AMD in later life [118]. The human serological and mouse model evidence cited here cannot directly address the gateway hypothesis, as the associations, if causal, could be mediated by infection outside the brain proper or by organism entry into the central nervous system via the vascular bed. Thus it is notable that, in humans with AMD, C. pneumoniae-positive staining was detected in 68% of paraffin sections from 26 surgically removed choroidal neovascular membranes of patients with AMD [119], raising the possibility of entry via the optic nerve. No direct evidence linking the ocular microbiome and its role in AD has been reported to our knowledge.

An infection in or trauma to the eye could recruit innate immune cells promoting inflammation as in bacterial keratitis caused by P. aeruginosa [120] and S. aureus [121]. In animal keratitis models, ocular administration of HSV-1 caused accumulation of corneal intracellular glutathione levels thereby altering the redox state potential of the corneal environment [122]. The ocular surface has the presence of bacteria, viruses, and fungi, with composition of antimicrobial peptides such as lactoferrin and β-lysin in human tears suggesting microbiome-host interaction at the ocular surface [123]. Interestingly, recent studies showed the role of Aβ as an antimicrobial peptide [40] and the presence of these peptides in the lens, retina, and primary aqueous humor [103] may indicate active infections in the eye. Further studies are needed to explore the role of the ocular microbiome in targeting the visual sensory structures as a gateway for entry and their engagement, if any, in the pathogenesis of AD.

Auditory Dysfunction in AD

Several studies suggest a connection between age-related hearing loss and risk of dementia [124, 125], raising questions about shared risk factors or a potential cause-and-effect relationship. Early autopsy studies showed AD hallmarks in the auditory midbrain, forebrain, central nucleus of the inferior colliculus, ventral division of the medial geniculate body, and primary and secondary auditory cortical areas, but with minimal AD pathology in peripheral processing regions like cochlea and cochlear nucleus [126]. Animal studies demonstrated that induced hearing loss through noise exposure leads to excitotoxicity in the hippocampus, leading to tau hyperphosphorylation, synaptic loss, cognitive decline, and hippocampal dysfunction, mirroring AD pathology [127]. Overall, this evidence indicates that hearing loss alone may not cause progressive degenerative dementia, emphasizing the requirement for additional components including the interaction between aging or genetic predisposition to trigger AD-like pathology.

Unlike the olfactory and visual deficits in AD, hearing impairment is not generally considered a predictor of cognitive decline and subsequent dementia. However, some studies suggest an association between hearing loss and acceleration of cognitive dysfunction or even the possibility of predicting the disease [128]. Hearing loss affects communication and contributes to social isolation and loneliness, which may further alter the integrity of cognitive processes [129] and promote cognitive deterioration. During aging, the prevalence of peripheral hearing loss is greatly increased, and it is also estimated that about 9%–14% of people aged >65 years show central auditory processing disorders [130]. The Framingham and Baltimore longitudinal aging population studies [131, 132] showed age-related hearing impairment (ARHI) with deficits in tonal frequencies, sensitivities, and frequency thresholds. Cochlear aging, noise (industrial, vibrations), ototoxicity (aminoglycosides, salicylates), head trauma, and comorbidities (diabetes, stroke, smoking) are risk factors associated with such ARHI [130, 132]. Such studies indicate a close association between ARHI, cognitive deficit, and central auditory processing disorders. However, it is still unresolved if the cognitive decline linked to hearing loss manifests with abnormalities either in peripheral or central auditory processing structures.

Microbiome and Host-Pathogen Interactions in the Auditory System

To our knowledge, there is no evidence that microbial entry via cranial nerve VIII (vestibulocochlear) plays a role in neurodegenerative disease. C. albicans as well as other fungal species are increasingly frequently identified as microbial causes of otitis media and hearing loss, especially in tropical and subtropical regions [133]. Parasites like T. gondii can also infect the ear and cause sensorineural hearing loss [134]. Other reports hypothesize that C. pneumoniae might be also investigated in this regard. Middle ear infections caused by a variety of viral and bacterial pathogens, including C. pneumoniae in a small number of cases, are prevalent in childhood. A case-control study found that C. pneumoniae immunoglobulin A (IgA) seropositivity, a putative biomarker for chronic infection, was associated with sudden-onset sensorineural hearing loss [135], suggesting possible direct infection of the eighth nerve. However, we found no studies investigating direct organism involvement in, or transport within, the auditory nerve, indicating limited evidence of infection and the auditory system in AD.

Gustatory Dysfunction in AD

Taste or gustatory dysfunction and changes in appetite, or altered food preferences are not common in early AD. They are, however, frequently observed in patients with frontal variant frontotemporal dementia, semantic dementia, and definite AD. These behavioral alterations reflect the network changes in the ventral frontal lobe, temporal lobe, and amygdala depending on the specific type of dementia [136–138].

Differently from AD, taste perception is markedly affected in other pathologies during their initial stages. For instance, upon SARS-CoV2 infection gustatory impairment was frequently experienced by a large segment of the affected individuals [139]. In addition, this sensory dysfunction, together with smell loss, was often the early and only sign described in otherwise asymptomatic subjects [140]. Another condition where taste sensitivity could be damaged is oral dysbiosis [141–143]. Among the factors linked to oral microbiome disruption, poor oral hygiene is a recurrent one [144]. Interestingly, the periodontal pathogen P. gingivalis is associated with (1) oral dysbiosis [145]; (2) multiple chronic pathologies, including AD [146–148]; and (3) taste dysfunction [149]. Altogether, the evidence on this bacterium further supports the hypothesis that, among the risk factors contributing to the onset and progression of AD and other neurodegenerative disorders, the microbial component could play a relevant role.

The Microbial Journey to Sensory Nerves

Reports examined in this review have consistently indicated the presence of diverse microorganisms, encompassing bacteria (such as Borrelia, Chlamydia, and P. gingivalis), fungi (particularly Candida), and viruses (including HSV-1, HSV-2, HHV-6A, HHV-6B, Epstein-Barr virus, cytomegalovirus, varicella zoster virus, and coronaviruses) within the brains of both AD patients and healthy controls. At the same time, our comprehensive analysis of the literature shows that many of these microbial species share a pathogenic link with more than one sensory organ of the head and neck area. Even if at this point speculative, a topological migration from one sensory organ to the other may occur, allowing progressive entry to the brain. Elucidating the mechanisms through which these microorganisms access the brain necessitates a refined consideration of the routes of entry, transcending the traditional perspective centered around the BBB. While the BBB regulates the passage of small molecules, its effectiveness as a deterrent against a multitude of microbes remains variable. Microbial access into the brain involves a spectrum of strategies, encompassing receptor-mediated transcytosis, migration within host cells (eg, macrophages; known as the Trojan horse hypothesis), and exploitation of circumventricular organs. Microbes exhibit a fascinating array of adaptations to cross these barriers, shedding light on the complex interplay between pathogens and the central nervous system [150, 151]. From the examined literature, microorganisms adapted to specific species exhibit an apparent evolution of efficient strategies to circumvent the BBB and facilitate their entry into the brain. This facilitated access to the brain may happen through sensory organs microbes colonizing the oral cavity and gut, microbial species and their byproducts (Figure 2) can exert a direct impact on the brain, bypassing the BBB through the associated peripheral sensory nerves like trigeminal, olfactory, facial, optic, and cochlear nerves, or through the enteric nervous system of the gut (gut-brain axis) [152]. Furthermore, microbiome dysbiosis can influence sensory functionality locally or have an impact on the brain via systemic inflammation.

In addition to age-related decline in sensory functions, acute microbial infections in peripheral sensory systems can contribute to sensory deficits, such as the loss of smell or hearing. For instance, microbial infections causing sinus inflammation can impede odor molecules from reaching the olfactory epithelium, while viral presence within cochlear nerve fibers may result in deafness [153, 154]. Importantly, in the context of AD, which is a pathological continuum of dementia with multiple factors, sensory impairments may precede decades before the onset of cognitive decline [2]. Whether sensory dysfunction is due to microbes trafficking to the brain, or because of the old microbes (past infection) that the immune system can no longer control, causing deficits in sensory processing, are some of the questions in the field of AD pathogenesis.

In future work, it will be crucial to understand which microbes stay in the peripheral sensory nerves versus those that reach the brain. Additionally, sensory issues could arise from a 2-way communication link between microbes located in the periphery and those present in the brain, which may also underlie sensory deficits.

As discussed above, sensory impairments may precede the onset of cognitive decline by decades; it is therefore widely believed that early sensory decline in AD could mostly arise due to progressive degeneration of key brain regions responsible for sensory processing. It remains to be unraveled whether these sensory deficits result from the microbes’ entry to the brain and intersect with the host vulnerability based on the genetic background, such as APOE-ε4, TREM2, and HLA-II (human leukocyte antigen class II), which amplify the inflammatory responses in the periphery and CNS.

CONCLUSIONS

Sensory functions decline naturally with age. Hyposmia, and visual and hearing impairment are further aggravated in dementia, and in some cases precede the onset of cognitive deficit. In light of recent studies corroborating the causal link between infection and amyloidogenesis, the sensory peripheral organs such as the nose and the eye assume particular clinical relevance for a neuroinflammatory spreading that can underlie the slow and progressive rostral to caudal neurodegeneration in AD.

While the functional anatomy of the sensory circuits is well characterized, host-pathogen mechanisms are just beginning to emerge. From an epidemiologic perspective, population-attributable risk is defined as the proportion of a disease that can theoretically be ameliorated by the elimination of a specific risk factor. If microbial mechanisms of sensory dysfunctions are identified as causally related to neurodegenerative processes, accessible and inexpensive smell, visual, or hearing testing could represent the first line of routine diagnostics. In cases of apparent deficit, a second-line determination of the causative microbial agents would allow therapeutic interventions tailored to the personal host-pathogen profile of each subject. For instance, combining the physiology with the medical history of the patients may be sufficient to categorize those with a higher risk and consequently adopt ad hoc measures, such as druggable targeting and/or sensory stimulation protocols, to prevent the occurrence or curb the progression of pathogenic mechanisms triggering neurodegenerative events.

Contributor Information

Praveen Bathini, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA; The Alzheimer's Pathobiome Initiative (AlzPI), Wake Forest, North Carolina, USA.

Emanuele Brai, BrainFit4Life, Fribourg, Switzerland.

Brian J Balin, The Alzheimer's Pathobiome Initiative (AlzPI), Wake Forest, North Carolina, USA; Center for Chronic Disorders of Aging, Philadelphia College of Osteopathic Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA; Intracell Research Group, LLC, Wake Forest, North Carolina, USA.

Lynn Bimler, Department of Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA.

David B Corry, The Alzheimer's Pathobiome Initiative (AlzPI), Wake Forest, North Carolina, USA; Department of Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA; Department of Medicine, Dan L. Duncan Comprehensive Cancer Center, Biology of Inflammation Center, and the Michael E. DeBakey VA Center for Translational Research in Inflammatory Diseases, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA; Department of Pathology and Immunology, Dan L. Duncan Comprehensive Cancer Center, Biology of Inflammation Center, and the Michael E. DeBakey VA Center for Translational Research in Inflammatory Diseases, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA.

Davangere P Devanand, The Alzheimer's Pathobiome Initiative (AlzPI), Wake Forest, North Carolina, USA; Department of Psychiatry and Neurology, Irving Medical Center, Columbia University, New York, USA.

Richard L Doty, The Alzheimer's Pathobiome Initiative (AlzPI), Wake Forest, North Carolina, USA; Smell and Taste Center, Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.

Garth D Ehrlich, The Alzheimer's Pathobiome Initiative (AlzPI), Wake Forest, North Carolina, USA; Center for Genomic Sciences, Institute for Molecular Medicine and Infectious Disease, Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Drexel University College of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.

William A Eimer, The Alzheimer's Pathobiome Initiative (AlzPI), Wake Forest, North Carolina, USA; Genetics and Aging Research Unit, Mass General Institute for Neurodegenerative Disease, Charlestown, Massachusetts, USA; Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Charlestown, Massachusetts, USA; Harvard Medical School, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.

Tamas Fulop, The Alzheimer's Pathobiome Initiative (AlzPI), Wake Forest, North Carolina, USA; Department of Medicine, Division of Geriatrics, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Research Center on Aging, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Québec, Canada.

David L Hahn, The Alzheimer's Pathobiome Initiative (AlzPI), Wake Forest, North Carolina, USA; Intracell Research Group, LLC, Wake Forest, North Carolina, USA.

Christine J Hammond, The Alzheimer's Pathobiome Initiative (AlzPI), Wake Forest, North Carolina, USA; Division of Research, Philadelphia College of Osteopathic Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.

Joseph Infanti, The Alzheimer's Pathobiome Initiative (AlzPI), Wake Forest, North Carolina, USA; Division of Research, Philadelphia College of Osteopathic Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.

Ruth Itzhaki, The Alzheimer's Pathobiome Initiative (AlzPI), Wake Forest, North Carolina, USA; Institute of Population Ageing, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.

Richard Lathe, The Alzheimer's Pathobiome Initiative (AlzPI), Wake Forest, North Carolina, USA; Division of Infection Medicine, University of Edinburgh Medical School, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.

Christopher Scott Little, The Alzheimer's Pathobiome Initiative (AlzPI), Wake Forest, North Carolina, USA; Center for Chronic Disorders of Aging, Philadelphia College of Osteopathic Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.

Rima McLeod, Departments of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA; Department of Pediatrics Infectious Diseases, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA.

Shima T Moein, The Alzheimer's Pathobiome Initiative (AlzPI), Wake Forest, North Carolina, USA; Smell and Taste Center, Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.

Amy R Nelson, Department of Physiology and Cell Biology, University of South Alabama, Mobile, Alabama, USA.

George Perry, The Alzheimer's Pathobiome Initiative (AlzPI), Wake Forest, North Carolina, USA; Intracell Research Group, LLC, Wake Forest, North Carolina, USA; Department of Biology, The University of Texas at San Antonio, San Antonio, Texas, USA.

Or A Shemesh, The Alzheimer's Pathobiome Initiative (AlzPI), Wake Forest, North Carolina, USA; Intracell Research Group, LLC, Wake Forest, North Carolina, USA; Department of Neurobiology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA; Department of Bioengineering, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.

Rudolph E Tanzi, The Alzheimer's Pathobiome Initiative (AlzPI), Wake Forest, North Carolina, USA; Genetics and Aging Research Unit, Mass General Institute for Neurodegenerative Disease, Charlestown, Massachusetts, USA; Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Charlestown, Massachusetts, USA; Harvard Medical School, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.

Wilmore C Webley, The Alzheimer's Pathobiome Initiative (AlzPI), Wake Forest, North Carolina, USA; Intracell Research Group, LLC, Wake Forest, North Carolina, USA; Department of Microbiology, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, Massachusetts, USA.

Nikki M Schultek, The Alzheimer's Pathobiome Initiative (AlzPI), Wake Forest, North Carolina, USA; Intracell Research Group, LLC, Wake Forest, North Carolina, USA.

Lavinia Alberi Auber, The Alzheimer's Pathobiome Initiative (AlzPI), Wake Forest, North Carolina, USA; BrainFit4Life, Fribourg, Switzerland; Intracell Research Group, LLC, Wake Forest, North Carolina, USA; Department of Medicine, University of Fribourg, Fribourg, Switzerland; VitalizeDx, Epalinges, Switzerland; VitalizeDx Eu, Trieste, Italy.

Notes

Acknowledgments. We acknowledge patients and their families to whom this work is dedicated. We thank The Sim Einstein Research Foundation, Inc. for supporting ongoing AlzPI research. We are grateful for the Infectious Diseases Society of America Foundation for supporting this research niche with grants and educational opportunities, and the Journal of Infectious Diseases for creating this special issue. We gratefully acknowledge the Alzheimer's Germ Quest and the Benter Foundation for recognizing the important contributions that microorganisms can make to the pathogenesis of neurodegenerative diseases. We acknowledge the humanistic, life-saving patient care and patient-centered research of the late Dr Charles W. Stratton IV, MD, a founding member of Intracell Research Group.

Supplement sponsorship. This article appears as part of the supplement “Advances in Identifying Microbial Pathogenesis in Alzheimer's Disease,” sponsored by the Infectious Diseases Society of America.

Financial support. This work was supported by the Susan and Richard Kiphart family; the Dominique Cornwell and Peter Mann Family Foundation; and The Rayni Foundation, Inc. on behalf of the Rodriguex Family (to R. Mc.) (grant number R00AG058780, National Institute on Aging, National Institutes of Health to A. R. N.).

Potential conflicts of interest. All authors: No reported conflicts. All authors have submitted the ICMJE Form for Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest. Conflicts that the editors consider relevant to the content of the manuscript have been disclosed.

References

  • 1. Long  S, Benoist  C, Weidner  W. World Alzheimer report 2023: reducing dementia risk: never too early, never too late. London, England: Alzheimer's Disease International, 2023. [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Tarawneh  R, Holtzman  DM. The clinical problem of symptomatic Alzheimer disease and mild cognitive impairment. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med  2012; 2:a006148. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Albers  MW, Gilmore  GC, Kaye  J, et al.  At the interface of sensory and motor dysfunctions and Alzheimer's disease. Alzheimers Dement  2015; 11:70–98. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Brai  E, Hummel  T, Alberi  L. Smell, an underrated early biomarker for brain aging. Front Neurosci  2020; 14:792. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Lathe  R, Schultek  NM, Balin  BJ, et al.  Establishment of a consensus protocol to explore the brain pathobiome in patients with mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer's disease: research outline and call for collaboration. Alzheimers Dement  2023; 19:5209–31. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Itzhaki  RF, Lin  WR, Shang  D, Wilcock  GK, Faragher  B, Jamieson  GA. Herpes simplex virus type 1 in brain and risk of Alzheimer's disease. Lancet  1997; 349:241–44. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Baringer  JR, Pisani  P. Herpes simplex virus genomes in human nervous system tissue analyzed by polymerase chain reaction. Ann Neurol  1994; 36:823–29. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Miklossy  J, Khalili  K, Gern  L, et al.  Borrelia burgdorferi persists in the brain in chronic Lyme neuroborreliosis and may be associated with Alzheimer disease. J Alzheimers Dis  2004; 6:639–49; discussion 673–81. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Balin  BJ, Gérard  HC, Arking  EJ, et al.  Identification and localization of Chlamydia pneumoniae in the Alzheimer's brain. Med Microbiol Immunol  1998; 187:23–42. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Ngô  HM, Zhou  Y, Lorenzi  H, et al.  Toxoplasma modulates signature pathways of human epilepsy, neurodegeneration and cancer. Sci Rep  2017; 7:11496. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Liu  N-Y, Sun  J-H, Jiang  X-F, Li  H. Helicobacter pylori infection and risk for developing dementia: an evidence-based meta-analysis of case-control and cohort studies. Aging  2021; 13:22571–87. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Dominy  SS, Lynch  C, Ermini  F, et al.  In Alzheimer's disease brains: evidence for disease causation and treatment with small-molecule inhibitors. Sci Adv  2019; 5:eaau3333. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Pal  G, Ramirez  V, Engen  PA, et al.  Deep nasal sinus cavity microbiota dysbiosis in Parkinson's disease. NPJ Parkinsons Dis  2021; 7:111. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Bathini  P, Foucras  S, Dupanloup  I, et al.  Classifying dementia progression using microbial profiling of saliva. Alzheimers Dement (Amst)  2020; 12:e12000. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Nelson  AR. Peripheral pathways to neurovascular unit dysfunction, cognitive impairment, and Alzheimer's disease. Front Aging Neurosci  2022; 14:858429. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Gérard  HC, Wildt  KL, Whittum-Hudson  JA, Lai  Z, Ager  J, Hudson  AP. The load of Chlamydia pneumoniae in the Alzheimer's brain varies with APOE genotype. Microb Pathog  2005; 39:19–26. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Hirose  K, Hartsock  JJ, Johnson  S, Santi  P, Salt  AN. Systemic lipopolysaccharide compromises the blood-labyrinth barrier and increases entry of serum fluorescein into the perilymph. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol  2014; 15:707–19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Attems  J, Jellinger  KA. Olfactory tau pathology in Alzheimer disease and mild cognitive impairment. Clin Neuropathol  2006; 25:265–71. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Bathini  P, Mottas  A, Jaquet  M, Brai  E, Alberi  L. Progressive signaling changes in the olfactory nerve of patients with Alzheimer's disease. Neurobiol Aging  2019; 76:80–95. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Zou  YM, Lu  D, Liu  LP, Zhang  HH, Zhou  YY. Olfactory dysfunction in Alzheimer's disease. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat  2016; 12:869–75. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Doty  RL. Olfactory dysfunction in neurodegenerative diseases: is there a common pathological substrate?  Lancet Neurol  2017; 16:478–88. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Rey  NL, Wesson  DW, Brundin  P. The olfactory bulb as the entry site for prion-like propagation in neurodegenerative diseases. Neurobiol Dis  2018; 109:226–48. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Braak  H, Braak  E. Neuropathological stageing of Alzheimer-related changes. Acta Neuropathol  1991; 82:239–59. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Parvand  M, Rankin  CH. Is there a shared etiology of olfactory impairments in normal aging and neurodegenerative disease?  J Alzheimers Dis  2020; 73:1–21. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Fülöp  T, Itzhaki  RF, Balin  BJ, Miklossy  J, Barron  AE. Role of microbes in the development of Alzheimer's disease: state of the art—an international symposium presented at the 2017 IAGG congress in San Francisco. Front Genet  2018; 9:362. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26. Choi  R, Goldstein  BJ. Olfactory epithelium: cells, clinical disorders, and insights from an adult stem cell niche. Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol  2018; 3:35–42. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27. Doty  RL. The olfactory vector hypothesis of neurodegenerative disease: is it viable?  Ann Neurol  2008; 63:7–15. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28. Herbert  RP, Harris  J, Chong  KP, Chapman  J, West  AK, Chuah  MI. Cytokines and olfactory bulb microglia in response to bacterial challenge in the compromised primary olfactory pathway. J Neuroinflammation  2012; 9:109. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29. Saiz-Sanchez  D, Flores-Cuadrado  A, Ubeda-Bañon  I, de la Rosa-Prieto  C, Martinez-Marcos  A. Interneurons in the human olfactory system in Alzheimer's disease. Exp Neurol  2016; 276:13–21. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30. Gu  Y, Zhang  J, Zhao  X, et al.  Olfactory dysfunction and its related molecular mechanisms in Parkinson's disease. Neural Regen Res  2024; 19:583–90. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31. Davies  DC, Brooks  JW, Lewis  DA. Axonal loss from the olfactory tracts in Alzheimer's disease. Neurobiol Aging  1993; 14:353–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32. Doty  RL, Mishra  A. Olfaction and its alteration by nasal obstruction, rhinitis, and rhinosinusitis. Laryngoscope  2001; 111:409–23. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33. Yasue  M, Sugiura  S, Uchida  Y, et al.  Prevalence of sinusitis detected by magnetic resonance imaging in subjects with dementia or Alzheimer's disease. Curr Alzheimer Res  2015; 12:1006–11. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34. François  A, Grebert  D, Rhimi  M, et al.  Olfactory epithelium changes in germfree mice. Sci Rep  2016; 6:24687. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35. Miklossy  J. Chronic inflammation and amyloidogenesis in Alzheimer's disease—role of spirochetes. J Alzheimers Dis  2008; 13:381–91. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36. Moir  RD, Lathe  R, Tanzi  RE. The antimicrobial protection hypothesis of Alzheimer's disease. Alzheimers Dement  2018; 14:1602–14. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37. Eimer  WA, Vijaya Kumar  DK, Navalpur Shanmugam  NK, et al.  Alzheimer's disease-associated β-amyloid is rapidly seeded by herpesviridae to protect against brain infection. Neuron  2018; 99:56–63.e3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38. James  C, Harfouche  M, Welton  NJ, et al.  Herpes simplex virus: global infection prevalence and incidence estimates, 2016. Bull World Health Organ  2020; 98:315–29. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39. Itzhaki  RF. Overwhelming evidence for a major role for herpes simplex virus type 1 (HSV1) in Alzheimer's disease (AD); underwhelming evidence against. Vaccines (Basel)  2021; 9:679. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40. Readhead  B, Haure-Mirande  J-V, Funk  CC, et al.  Multiscale analysis of independent Alzheimer's cohorts finds disruption of molecular, genetic, and clinical networks by human herpesvirus. Neuron  2018; 99:64–82.e7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41. Jamieson  GA, Maitland  NJ, Wilcock  GK, Craske  J, Itzhaki  RF. Latent herpes simplex virus type 1 in normal and Alzheimer's disease brains. J Med Virol  1991; 33:224–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42. Cairns  DM, Rouleau  N, Parker  RN, Walsh  KG, Gehrke  L, Kaplan  DL. A 3D human brain-like tissue model of herpes-induced Alzheimer's disease. Sci Adv  2020; 6:eaay8828. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43. De Chiara  G, Piacentini  R, Fabiani  M, et al.  Recurrent herpes simplex virus-1 infection induces hallmarks of neurodegeneration and cognitive deficits in mice. PLoS Pathog  2019; 15:e1007617. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44. Wozniak  MA, Frost  AL, Itzhaki  RF. Alzheimer's disease-specific Tau phosphorylation is induced by herpes simplex virus type 1. J Alzheimers Dis  2009; 16:341–50. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45. Itzhaki  RF. Herpes simplex virus type 1 and Alzheimer's disease: increasing evidence for a major role of the virus. Front Aging Neurosci  2014; 6:202. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46. Robinson  SR, Bishop  GM. Abeta as a bioflocculant: implications for the amyloid hypothesis of Alzheimer's disease. Neurobiol Aging  2002; 23:1051–72. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47. Wozniak  MA, Itzhaki  RF, Shipley  SJ, Dobson  CB. Herpes simplex virus infection causes cellular beta-amyloid accumulation and secretase upregulation. Neurosci Lett  2007; 429:95–100. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48. Wozniak  MA, Frost  AL, Preston  CM, Itzhaki  RF. Antivirals reduce the formation of key Alzheimer's disease molecules in cell cultures acutely infected with herpes simplex virus type 1. PLoS One  2011; 6:e25152. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49. Tzeng  N-S, Chung  C-H, Lin  F-H, et al.  Anti-herpetic medications and reduced risk of dementia in patients with herpes simplex virus infections-a nationwide, population-based cohort study in Taiwan. Neurotherapeutics  2018; 15:417–29. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50. Nimgaonkar  VL, Yolken  RH, Wang  T, et al.  Temporal cognitive decline associated with exposure to infectious agents in a population-based, aging cohort. Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord  2016; 30:216–22. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51. Kim  JYH, Ragusa  M, Tortosa  F, et al.  Viral reactivations and co-infections in COVID-19 patients: a systematic review. BMC Infect Dis  2023; 23:259. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52. Lophatananon  A, Carr  M, Mcmillan  B, et al.  The association of herpes zoster and influenza vaccinations with the risk of developing dementia: a population-based cohort study within the UK clinical practice research datalink. BMC Public Health  2023; 23:1903. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53. Cairns  DM, Itzhaki  RF, Kaplan  DL. Potential involvement of varicella zoster virus in Alzheimer's disease via reactivation of quiescent herpes simplex virus type 1. J Alzheimers Dis  2022; 88:1189–200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54. Lin  W-R, Wozniak  MA, Cooper  RJ, Wilcock  GK, Itzhaki  RF. Herpesviruses in brain and Alzheimer's disease. J Pathol  2002; 197:395–402. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55. Harberts  E, Yao  K, Wohler  JE, et al.  Human herpesvirus-6 entry into the central nervous system through the olfactory pathway. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A  2011; 108:13734–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56. Liu  N, Yang  D, Zhang  T, Sun  J, Fu  J, Li  H. Systematic review and meta-analysis of olfactory and gustatory dysfunction in COVID-19. Int J Infect Dis  2022; 117:155–61. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57. Verma  AK, Zheng  J, Meyerholz  DK, Perlman  S. SARS-CoV-2 infection of sustentacular cells disrupts olfactory signaling pathways. JCI Insight  2022; 7:24. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58. Stein  SR, Ramelli  SC, Grazioli  A, et al.  SARS-CoV-2 infection and persistence in the human body and brain at autopsy. Nature  2022; 612:758–63. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59. Cheetham  NJ, Penfold  R, Giunchiglia  V, et al.  The effects of COVID-19 on cognitive performance in a community-based cohort: a COVID symptom study biobank prospective cohort study. EClinicalMedicine  2023; 62:102086. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60. Gérard  HC, Dreses-Werringloer  U, Wildt  KS, et al.  Chlamydophila (Chlamydia) pneumoniae in the Alzheimer's brain. FEMS Immunol Med Microbiol  2006; 48:355–66. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61. Little  CS, Joyce  TA, Hammond  CJ, et al.  Detection of bacterial antigens and Alzheimer's disease-like pathology in the central nervous system of BALB/c mice following intranasal infection with a laboratory isolate of chlamydia pneumoniae. Front Aging Neurosci  2014; 6:304. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62. Chacko  A, Delbaz  A, Walkden  H, et al.  Chlamydia pneumoniae can infect the central nervous system via the olfactory and trigeminal nerves and contributes to Alzheimer's disease risk. Sci Rep  2022; 12:2759. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63. Boelen  E, Steinbusch  HWM, van der Ven  AJAM, Grauls  G, Bruggeman  CA, Stassen  FRM. Chlamydia pneumoniae infection of brain cells: an in vitro study. Neurobiol Aging  2007; 28:524–32. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64. Mann  DM, Tucker  CM, Yates  PO. Alzheimer's disease: an olfactory connection?. Mech Ageing Dev  1988; 42:1–15. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65. Miklossy  J. Alzheimer's disease—a neurospirochetosis. Analysis of the evidence following Koch's and Hill's criteria. J Neuroinflammation  2011; 8:90. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66. MacDonald  AB, Miranda  JM. Concurrent neocortical borreliosis and Alzheimer's disease. Hum Pathol  1987; 18:759–61. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67. Nicolson  GL. Chronic bacterial and viral infections in neurodegenerative and neurobehavioral diseases. Lab Med  2008; 39:291–9. [Google Scholar]
  • 68. Gylfe  A, Wahlgren  M, Fahlén  L, Bergström  S. Activation of latent Lyme borreliosis concurrent with a herpes simplex virus type 1 infection. Scand J Infect Dis  2002; 34:922–4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69. Pisa  D, Alonso  R, Juarranz  A, Rábano  A, Carrasco  L. Direct visualization of fungal infection in brains from patients with Alzheimer's disease. J Alzheimers Dis  2015; 43:613–24. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70. Pisa  D, Alonso  R, Rábano  A, Rodal  I, Carrasco  L. Different brain regions are infected with fungi in Alzheimer's disease. Sci Rep  2015; 5:15015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71. Alonso  R, Pisa  D, Fernández-Fernández  AM, Carrasco  L. Infection of fungi and bacteria in brain tissue from elderly persons and patients with Alzheimer's disease. Front Aging Neurosci  2018; 10:159. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72. Alonso  R, Pisa  D, Marina  AI, Morato  E, Rábano  A, Carrasco  L. Fungal infection in patients with Alzheimer's disease. J Alzheimers Dis  2014; 41:301–11. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73. Alonso  R, Pisa  D, Rábano  A, Carrasco  L. Alzheimer's disease and disseminated mycoses. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis  2014; 33:1125–32. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74. Alonso  R, Pisa  D, Aguado  B, Carrasco  L. Identification of fungal species in brain tissue from Alzheimer's disease by next-generation sequencing. J Alzheimers Dis  2017; 58:55–67. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75. Pisa  D, Alonso  R, Fernández-Fernández  AM, Rábano  A, Carrasco  L. Polymicrobial infections in brain tissue from Alzheimer's disease patients. Sci Rep  2017; 7:5559. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76. Porter  PC, Lim  DJ, Maskatia  ZK, et al.  Airway surface mycosis in chronic TH2-associated airway disease. J Allergy Clin Immunol  2014; 134:325–31. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77. Wu  Y, Du  S, Bimler  LH, et al.  Toll-like receptor 4 and CD11b expressed on microglia coordinate eradication of Candida albicans cerebral mycosis. Cell Rep  2023; 42:113240. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78. Roy  ER, Wang  B, Wan  Y-W, et al.  Type I interferon response drives neuroinflammation and synapse loss in Alzheimer disease. J Clin Invest  2020; 130:1912–30. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79. Wu  Y, Du  S, Johnson  JL, et al.  Microglia and amyloid precursor protein coordinate control of transient candida cerebritis with memory deficits. Nat Commun  2019; 10:58. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80. Mahalingam  SS, Jayaraman  S, Pandiyan  P. Fungal colonization and infections-interactions with other human diseases. Pathogens  2022; 11:212. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81. Yang  H-Y, Chien  W-C, Chung  C-H, et al.  Risk of dementia in patients with toxoplasmosis: a nationwide, population-based cohort study in Taiwan. Parasit Vectors  2021; 14:435. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82. McPhillie  M, Zhou  Y, Bissati  KE, et al.  New paradigms for understanding and step changes in treating active and chronic, persistent apicomplexan infections. Sci Rep  2016; 6:29179. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83. Silver  DJ, Steindler  DA. Common astrocytic programs during brain development, injury and cancer. Trends Neurosci  2009; 32:303–11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84. Matlaf  LA, Harkins  LE, Bezrookove  V, Cobbs  CS, Soroceanu  L. Cytomegalovirus pp71 protein is expressed in human glioblastoma and promotes pro-angiogenic signaling by activation of stem cell factor. PLoS One  2013; 8:e68176. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85. Hermes  G, Ajioka  JW, Kelly  KA, et al.  Neurological and behavioral abnormalities, ventricular dilatation, altered cellular functions, inflammation, and neuronal injury in brains of mice due to common, persistent, parasitic infection. J Neuroinflammation  2008; 5:48. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86. Franceschini  A, Szklarczyk  D, Frankild  S, et al.  STRING v9.1: protein-protein interaction networks, with increased coverage and integration. Nucleic Acids Res  2013; 41:D808–15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87. Szklarczyk  D, Franceschini  A, Wyder  S, et al.  STRING v10: protein-protein interaction networks, integrated over the tree of life. Nucleic Acids Res  2015; 43:D447–52. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88. Berdoy  M, Webster  JP, Macdonald  DW. Fatal attraction in rats infected with Toxoplasma gondii. Proc Biol Sci  2000; 267:1591–4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89. Vyas  A. Mechanisms of host behavioral change in Toxoplasma gondii rodent association. PLoS Pathog  2015; 11:e1004935. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90. Poirotte  C, Kappeler  PM, Ngoubangoye  B, Bourgeois  S, Moussodji  M, Charpentier  MJE. Morbid attraction to leopard urine in toxoplasma-infected chimpanzees. Curr Biol  2016; 26:R98–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91. Flegr  J, Lenochová  P, Hodný  Z, Vondrová  M. Fatal attraction phenomenon in humans: cat odour attractiveness increased for toxoplasma-infected men while decreased for infected women. PLoS Negl Trop Dis  2011; 5:e1389. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92. Eberl  G. A new age for (mucosal) neuroimmunology. Mucosal Immunol  2022; 15:1052–5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 93. Yeh  FL, Wang  Y, Tom  I, Gonzalez  LC, Sheng  M. TREM2 binds to apolipoproteins, including APOE and CLU/APOJ, and thereby facilitates uptake of amyloid-beta by microglia. Neuron  2016; 91:328–40. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 94. Bertram  L, Lange  C, Mullin  K, et al.  Genome-wide association analysis reveals putative Alzheimer's disease susceptibility loci in addition to APOE. Am J Hum Genet  2008; 83:623–32. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 95. Pane  K, Sgambati  V, Zanfardino  A, et al.  A new cryptic cationic antimicrobial peptide from human apolipoprotein E with antibacterial activity and immunomodulatory effects on human cells. FEBS J  2016; 283:2115–31. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 96. Murphy  C, Solomon  ES, Haase  L, Wang  M, Morgan  CD. Olfaction in aging and Alzheimer's disease: event-related potentials to a cross-modal odor-recognition memory task discriminate ApoE epsilon4+ and ApoE epsilon 4- individuals. Ann N Y Acad Sci  2009; 1170:647–57. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 97. Metzler-Baddeley  C, Baddeley  RJ, Lovell  PG, Laffan  A, Jones  RW. Visual impairments in dementia with Lewy bodies and posterior cortical atrophy. Neuropsychology  2010; 24:35–48. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 98. Javaid  FZ, Brenton  J, Guo  L, Cordeiro  MF. Visual and ocular manifestations of Alzheimer's disease and their use as biomarkers for diagnosis and progression. Front Neurol  2016; 7:55. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 99. Koronyo  Y, Biggs  D, Barron  E, et al.  Retinal amyloid pathology and proof-of-concept imaging trial in Alzheimer's disease. JCI Insight  2017; 2:e93621. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 100. Hui  J, Zhao  Y, Yu  S, Liu  J, Chiu  K, Wang  Y. Detection of retinal changes with optical coherence tomography angiography in mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer's disease patients: a meta-analysis. PLoS One  2021; 16:e0255362. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 101. Wu  SZ, Masurkar  AV, Balcer  LJ. Afferent and efferent visual markers of Alzheimer's disease: a review and update in early stage disease. Front Aging Neurosci  2020; 12:572337. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 102. Lim  JKH, Li  Q-X, He  Z, et al.  The eye as a biomarker for Alzheimer's disease. Front Neurosci  2016; 10:536. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 103. Inoue  T, Kawaji  T, Tanihara  H. Elevated levels of multiple biomarkers of Alzheimer's disease in the aqueous humor of eyes with open-angle glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci  2013; 54:5353–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 104. Goldstein  LE, Muffat  JA, Cherny  RA, et al.  Cytosolic beta-amyloid deposition and supranuclear cataracts in lenses from people with Alzheimer's disease. Lancet  2003; 361:1258–65. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 105. Colligris  P, Perez de Lara  MJ, Colligris  B, Pintor  J. Ocular manifestations of Alzheimer's and other neurodegenerative diseases: the prospect of the eye as a tool for the early diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease. J Ophthalmol  2018; 2018:8538573. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 106. Spires-Jones  TL, Stoothoff  WH, de Calignon  A, Jones  PB, Hyman  BT. Tau pathophysiology in neurodegeneration: a tangled issue. Trends Neurosci  2009; 32:150–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 107. Paris  D, Patel  N, DelleDonne  A, Quadros  A, Smeed  R, Mullan  M. Impaired angiogenesis in a transgenic mouse model of cerebral amyloidosis. Neurosci Lett  2004; 366:80–5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 108. Hinton  DR, Sadun  AA, Blanks  JC, Miller  CA. Optic-nerve degeneration in Alzheimer's disease. N Engl J Med  1986; 315:485–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 109. Bayer  AU, Keller  ON, Ferrari  F, Maag  K-P. Association of glaucoma with neurodegenerative diseases with apoptotic cell death: Alzheimer's disease and Parkinson's disease. Am J Ophthalmol  2002; 133:135–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 110. Tsai  CS, Ritch  R, Schwartz  B, et al.  Optic nerve head and nerve fiber layer in Alzheimer's disease. Arch Ophthalmol  1991; 109:199–204. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 111. Haseeb  AA, Elhusseiny  AM, Siddiqui  MZ, Ahmad  KT, Sallam  AB. Fungal endophthalmitis: a comprehensive review. J Fungi (Basel)  2021; 7:996. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 112. Rutzen  AR, Ortega-Larrocea  G, Dugel  PU, et al.  Clinicopathologic study of retinal and choroidal biopsies in intraocular inflammation. Am J Ophthalmol  1995; 119:597–611. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 113. London  A, Benhar  I, Schwartz  M. The retina as a window to the brain-from eye research to CNS disorders. Nat Rev Neurol  2013; 9:44–53. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 114. Lee  CS, Larson  EB, Gibbons  LE, et al.  Associations between recent and established ophthalmic conditions and risk of Alzheimer's disease. Alzheimers Dement  2018; 15:34–41. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 115. Kalayoglu  MV, Galvan  C, Mahdi  OS, Byrne  GI, Mansour  S. Serological association between Chlamydia pneumoniae infection and age-related macular degeneration. Arch Ophthalmol  2003; 121:478–82. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 116. Ishida  O, Oku  H, Ikeda  T, Nishimura  M, Kawagoe  K, Nakamura  K. Is Chlamydia pneumoniae infection a risk factor for age related macular degeneration?  Br J Ophthalmol  2003; 87:523–4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 117. Baird  PN, Robman  LD, Richardson  AJ, et al.  Gene-environment interaction in progression of AMD: the CFH gene, smoking and exposure to chronic infection. Hum Mol Genet  2008; 17:1299–305. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 118. Hata  M, Hata  M, Andriessen  EM, et al.  Early-life peripheral infections reprogram retinal microglia and aggravate neovascular age-related macular degeneration in later life. J Clin Invest  2023; 133:e159757. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 119. Wolf-Schnurrbusch  UEK, Hess  R, Jordi  F, et al.  Detection of Chlamydia and complement factors in neovascular membranes of patients with age-related macular degeneration. Ocul Immunol Inflamm  2013; 21:36–43. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 120. Hazlett  LD. Bacterial infections of the cornea (Pseudomonas aeruginosa). Chem Immunol Allergy  2007; 92:185–94. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 121. Asbell  P, Stenson  S. Ulcerative keratitis. Survey of 30 years’ laboratory experience. Arch Ophthalmol  1982; 100:77–80. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 122. Nucci  C, Palamara  AT, Ciriolo  MR, et al.  Imbalance in corneal redox state during herpes simplex virus 1-induced keratitis in rabbits. Effectiveness of exogenous glutathione supply. Exp Eye Res  2000; 70:215–20. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 123. Akpek  EK, Gottsch  JD. Immune defense at the ocular surface. Eye  2003; 17:949–56. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 124. Ford  AH, Hankey  GJ, Yeap  BB, Golledge  J, Flicker  L, Almeida  OP. Hearing loss and the risk of dementia in later life. Maturitas  2018; 112:1–11. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 125. Golub  JS, Luchsinger  JA, Manly  JJ, Stern  Y, Mayeux  R, Schupf  N. Observed hearing loss and incident dementia in a multiethnic cohort. J Am Geriatr Soc  2017; 65:1691–7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 126. Swords  GM, Nguyen  LT, Mudar  RA, Llano  DA. Auditory system dysfunction in Alzheimer disease and its prodromal states: a review. Ageing Res Rev  2018; 44:49–59. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 127. Nadhimi  Y, Llano  DA. Does hearing loss lead to dementia? A review of the literature. Hear Res  2021; 402:108038. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 128. Liu  C-M, Lee  CT-C. Association of hearing loss with dementia. JAMA Netw Open  2019; 2:e198112. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 129. Shukla  A, Harper  M, Pedersen  E, et al.  Hearing loss, loneliness, and social isolation: a systematic review. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg  2020; 162:622–33. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 130. Rosenhall  U. Epidemiology of age related hearing loss. Hear Balance Commun  2015; 13:46–50. [Google Scholar]
  • 131. Gates  GA, Cooper  JC  Jr, Kannel  WB, Miller  NJ. Hearing in the elderly: the Framingham cohort, 1983–1985. Part I. Basic audiometric test results. Ear Hear  1990; 11:247–56. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 132. Brant  LJ, Fozard  JL. Age changes in pure-tone hearing thresholds in a longitudinal study of normal human aging. J Acoust Soc Am  1990; 88:813–20. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 133. Durmaz  R, Durmaz  B, Arı  O, Abdulmajed  O, Çelik  S, Tayyar Kalcıoğlu  M. Mycobiome in the middle ear cavity with and without otitis media with effusion. Turk Arch Otorhinolaryngol  2021; 59:261–70. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 134. Corrêa  CC, Maximino  LP, Weber  SAT. Hearing disorders in congenital toxoplasmosis: a literature review. Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol  2018; 22:330–3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 135. Dünne  AA, Wiegand  A, Prinz  H, Slenczka  W, Werner  JA. Chlamydia pneumoniae IgA seropositivity and sudden sensorineural hearing loss. Otolaryngol Pol  2004; 58:427–8. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 136. Ikeda  M, Brown  J, Holland  AJ, Fukuhara  R, Hodges  JR. Changes in appetite, food preference, and eating habits in frontotemporal dementia and Alzheimer's disease. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry  2002; 73:371–6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 137. Sakai  M, Kazui  H, Shigenobu  K, Komori  K, Ikeda  M, Nishikawa  T. Gustatory dysfunction as an early symptom of semantic dementia. Dement Geriatr Cogn Dis Extra  2017; 7:395–405. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 138. Kouzuki  M, Ichikawa  J, Shirasagi  D, et al.  Detection and recognition thresholds for five basic tastes in patients with mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer's disease dementia. BMC Neurol  2020; 20:110. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 139. Srinivasan  M. Taste dysfunction and long COVID-19. Front Cell Infect Microbiol  2021; 11:716563. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 140. Vaira  LA, Salzano  G, Deiana  G, De Riu  G. Anosmia and ageusia: common findings in COVID-19 patients. Laryngoscope  2020; 130:1787. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 141. Maheswaran  T, Abikshyeet  P, Sitra  G, Gokulanathan  S, Vaithiyanadane  V, Jeelani  S. Gustatory dysfunction. J Pharm Bioallied Sci  2014; 6(Suppl 1):S30–3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 142. Leung  R, Covasa  M. Do gut microbes taste?  Nutrients  2021; 13:2581. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 143. Heisey  EM, McCluskey  LP. A possible role for taste receptor cells in surveying the oral microbiome. PLoS Biol  2023; 21:e3001953. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 144. Maier  T. Oral microbiome in health and disease: maintaining a healthy, balanced ecosystem and reversing dysbiosis. Microorganisms  2023; 11:1453. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 145. Simas  AM, Kramer  CD, Weinberg  EO, Genco  CA. Oral infection with a periodontal pathogen alters oral and gut microbiomes. Anaerobe  2021; 71:102399. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 146. Kanagasingam  S, von Ruhland  C, Welbury  R, Chukkapalli  SS, Singhrao  SK. Porphyromonas gingivalis conditioned medium induces amyloidogenic processing of the amyloid-β protein precursor upon infection of SH-SY5Y cells. J Alzheimers Dis Rep  2022; 6:577–87. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 147. Kanagasingam  S, Chukkapalli  SS, Welbury  R, Singhrao  SK. Porphyromonas gingivalis is a strong risk factor for Alzheimer's disease. J Alzheimers Dis Rep  2020; 4:501–11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 148. Liu  S, Butler  CA, Ayton  S, Reynolds  EC, Dashper  SG. Porphyromonas gingivalis and the pathogenesis of Alzheimer's disease. Crit Rev Microbiol  2024; 50:127–37. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 149. Takahashi  N. Oral microbiome metabolism: from ‘who are they?’ to ‘what are they doing?’  J Dent Res  2015; 94:1628–37. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 150. Lathe  R, St Clair  D. From conifers to cognition: microbes, brain and behavior. Genes, Brain Behav  2020; 19:e12680. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 151. Landry  RL, Embers  ME. Does dementia have a microbial cause?  NeuroSci  2022; 3:262–83. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 152. Narengaowa, Kong  W, Lan  F, Awan  UF, Qing  H, Ni  J. The oral-gut-brain axis: the influence of microbes in Alzheimer's disease. Front Cell Neurosci  2021; 15:633735. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 153. Cohen  BE, Durstenfeld  A, Roehm  PC. Viral causes of hearing loss: a review for hearing health professionals. Trends Hear  2014; 18:2331216514541361. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 154. Park  JW, Wang  X, Xu  R-H. Revealing the mystery of persistent smell loss in long COVID patients. Int J Biol Sci  2022; 18:4795–808. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Infectious Diseases are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES