Skip to main content
The Western Journal of Medicine logoLink to The Western Journal of Medicine
. 1996 Apr;164(4):355–358.

Clinical breast examination.

W H Goodson 3rd 1
PMCID: PMC1303521  PMID: 8732745

Abstract

An astute clinician has an appreciation of the wide variation possible in normal breasts, but anticipates that the palpation of the breasts of an individual woman will be determined by basic facts concerning typical relative distribution of gland tissue, breast symmetry, the influence of life history, and possibly previous surgery. If the findings of a CBE are not as anticipated, the clinician must find out why this is so. This is a different frame of reference from asking whether a given lump or area should be considered suspicious for cancer. The basic questions are whether the findings of a CBE are consistent with typical breast structure and anatomy and in the context of the woman's life history. If these questions can be answered in the affirmative, the examination is complete; if not, further evaluation is necessary.

Full text

PDF
355

Images in this article

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Donegan W. L. Evaluation of a palpable breast mass. N Engl J Med. 1992 Sep 24;327(13):937–942. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199209243271307. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Farwell M. F., Foster R. S., Jr, Costanza M. C. Breast cancer and earlier detection efforts. Realized and unrealized impact on stage. Arch Surg. 1993 May;128(5):510–514. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.1993.01420170040005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Goodson W. H., 3rd, Mailman R., Jacobson M., Hunt T. K. What do breast symptoms mean? Am J Surg. 1985 Aug;150(2):271–274. doi: 10.1016/0002-9610(85)90135-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Goodson W. H., 3rd, Miller T. R., Sickles E. A., Upton R. A. Lack of correlation of clinical breast examination with high-risk histopathology. Am J Med. 1990 Dec;89(6):752–756. doi: 10.1016/0002-9343(90)90217-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Grady D., Hodgkins M. L., Goodson W. H., 3rd The lumpy breast. West J Med. 1988 Aug;149(2):226–229. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Griffith C. D., Dowle C. S., Hinton C. P., Blamey R. W. The breast pain clinic: a rational approach to classification and treatment of breast pain. Postgrad Med J. 1987 Jul;63(741):547–549. doi: 10.1136/pgmj.63.741.547. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Hoskins K. F., Stopfer J. E., Calzone K. A., Merajver S. D., Rebbeck T. R., Garber J. E., Weber B. L. Assessment and counseling for women with a family history of breast cancer. A guide for clinicians. JAMA. 1995 Feb 15;273(7):577–585. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Love S. M., Gelman R. S., Silen W. Sounding board. Fibrocystic "disease" of the breast--a nondisease? N Engl J Med. 1982 Oct 14;307(16):1010–1014. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198210143071611. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Mahoney L., Csima A. Efficiency of palpation in clinical detection of breast cancer. Can Med Assoc J. 1982 Oct 15;127(8):729–730. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Mansel R. E. ABC of breast diseases. Breast pain. BMJ. 1994 Oct 1;309(6958):866–868. doi: 10.1136/bmj.309.6958.866. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Reeves M. J., Newcomb P. A., Remington P. L., Marcus P. M. Determinants of breast cancer detection among Wisconsin (United States) women, 1988-90. Cancer Causes Control. 1995 Mar;6(2):103–111. doi: 10.1007/BF00052770. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Saunders K. J., Pilgrim C. A., Pennypacker H. S. Increased proficiency of search in breast self-examination. Cancer. 1986 Dec 1;58(11):2531–2537. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(19861201)58:11<2531::aid-cncr2820581128>3.0.co;2-j. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Western Journal of Medicine are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES