Skip to main content
Wiley Open Access Collection logoLink to Wiley Open Access Collection
. 2026 Jan 16;32(12):e03407. doi: 10.1002/chem.202503407

Induced‐Fit Recognition by a Calixarene–Pyrene Conjugate for Single‐ and Dual‐Wavelength Fluorescence Sensing in Water

Joana N Martins 1, Márcia Pessêgo 2, Luis Garcia‐Rio 2, João Carlos Lima 1, Nuno Basílio 1,✉
PMCID: PMC13037348  PMID: 41543175

ABSTRACT

The discovery of fluorescence receptors that selectively bind small molecules with high affinity in aqueous media is critical for the development of new sensing and bioimaging assays. We herein report a new fluorescence receptor‐dye chemosensor based on the monofunctionalization of p‐sulfonatocalix[4]arene (SC4) receptor with pyrene (SC4‐4Py). The SC4‐4Py conjugate was found to retain the exceptional binding properties of SC4, allowing the high‐affinity recognition of neurotransmitters, amino acids, and biogenic amines in aqueous solution and their optical detection. The SC4‐4Py chemosensor operates through a photoinduced electron transfer (PET) mechanism triggered by conformational changes in the calixarene structure upon binding, allowing single‐wavelength fluorescence detection of target analytes and its expansion into a dual‐wavelength ratiometric indicator displacement assay (IDA) that relies on competitive PET between the pyrene and non‐covalently bound lucigenin dye.

Keywords: chemosensors, calixarenes, host‐guest systems, induced‐fit recognition, ratiometric probes


A sulfonatocalix[4]arene–pyrene conjugate functions as a fluorescence chemosensor for the optical detection of biorelevant analytes in water. Its photoinduced electron transfer (PET) response is triggered by an induced‐fit recognition mechanism. Noncovalent assembly with an additional dye affords dual‐color ratiometric signaling via competitive PET.

graphic file with name CHEM-32-e03407-g005.jpg

1. Introduction

The development of molecular sensors and probes capable of detecting small molecules and ions in aqueous environments is essential for a wider understanding of many biological and environmentally relevant processes. Sensing strategies based on supramolecular chemosensors explore molecular recognition and reversible self‐assembly phenomena to create stimuli‐responsive systems that can detect target analytes (e.g. disease biomarkers, pollutants, etc) and monitor their concentration fluctuations within specific environments [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6]. Water‐soluble macrocyclic receptors featuring hydrophobic cavities decorated with polar functional groups offer particularly useful recognition elements for the construction of supramolecular chemosensors [7, 8, 9, 10]. Their successful recognition properties emerge from a combination of factors that include the establishment of complementary non‐covalent interactions with the analytes of interest, the hydrophobic effect, and size‐ and shape selectivity associated to their highly preorganized and relatively rigid structures, which frequently enhances their affinity and selectivity with respect to their acyclic counterparts [11, 12, 13].

p‐Sulfonatocalix[n]arenes (SCn), a widely explored class of water‐soluble calixarene macrocycles, have been shown to be particularly useful synthetic receptors for the binding of ammonium ions in aqueous solution, presenting high affinity and selectivity toward relevant targets such as neurotransmitters, post‐translational trimethylated lysine residues, arginine‐ and lysine‐rich peptides, biogenic amines, among other molecules of interest [14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22]. The use of SCn as receptors in the construction of optical chemosensors has been dominated by the so‐called indicator displacement assay (IDA) [23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30]. This approach explores dynamic receptor‐dye assemblies to detect target analytes via competitive binding, using the fluorescence or colorimetric signal given by the replacement of the dye from the receptor binding site [31, 32]. IDA based on self‐assembled SCn‐dye chemosensors have been demonstrated to be highly useful and versatile molecular tools in the development of sensing assays for the monitoring and measurement of enzymatic activities, membrane transport or the uptake of small molecules in living cells [33, 34, 35, 36]. In contrast to SCn‐dye self‐assembled chemosensors, alternative sensing approaches involving the covalent modification of SCn with dye molecules remain practically unexplored. A rare example was reported by Hof and coworkers, who developed fluorescent p‐sulfonatocalix[4]arene (SC4) derivatives integrating merocyanine dyes into their macrocyclic structure which self‐assemble into nonemissive homodimers in aqueous solution [37]. These dimers can be competitively disassembled upon binding of analytes to form emissive host‐guest complexes, enabling a turn‐on fluorescence sensing mechanism to detect relevant targets such as methylated lysine or drugs in biological fluids. [37, 38] Despite the success of these strategies, nearly all SC4‐based chemosensors rely on single‐wavelength fluorescence signaling, which is highly sensitive to environmental conditions and probe concentration. This dependence can compromise quantitative accuracy and result in false positives or negatives in qualitative analysis. In contrast, ratiometric readout systems address these limitations by incorporating an internal reference signal, enabling correction for such variations. This approach enhances the reliability of quantitative measurements and reduces the need for extensive controls in qualitative applications [39, 40]. Host–guest ratiometric chemosensors typically employ dye‐functionalized macrocycles to achieve fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET) between complementary encapsulated dyes [41, 42, 43]. However, in SC4‐based architectures, this strategy can be severely hindered by significant dye quenching by this receptor and frequent aggregation of the resulting host–guest complexes [7, 30, 44, 45].

Herein we report a new monofunctionalized SC4‐Pyrene conjugate (SC4‐4Py) to introduce an optical sensing design that explores the conformational mobility of SC4 along with photoinduced electron transfer (PET) phenomenon (Scheme 1). Our approach leverages the ability of the conformationally mobile SC4‐4Py to adopt a fixed cone conformation upon binding target guest molecules. This process brings the phenolate anion closer to the pyrene unit, thereby enhancing the PET quenching efficiency. Notably, this sensing mechanism can be extended to a dual‐wavelength ratiometric indicator displacement assay (IDA) through competitive PET, using lucigenin (LCG) as a reporter dye for the detection of neurotransmitters, amino acids, and biogenic amines.

SCHEME 1.

SCHEME 1

– Previous works on self‐assembled chemosensors using sulfonatocalix[4]arene receptors: A—Conventional indicator displacement assay and B—Hof's dimeric assembly. The approach introduced in this work: C—The conformationally flexible SC4‐4Py adopts different conformations resulting from the free rotation of the unsubstituted phenol units through the macrocyclic annulus. This leads to an averaged weaker PET due to the conformations that place the phenolate oxygen distant to the pyrene dye. Binding of target guest molecules blocks SC4‐4Py in the cone conformation, bringing the phenolate closer to the pyrene thus increasing the PET efficiency. D—Combining the lucigenin dye with SC4‐4Py enabled a dual‐wavelength ratiometric displacement assay. E—Structures of the lucigenin dye and guest molecules explored in this work.

2. Results and Discussion

SC4‐4Py was synthesized by direct monoalkylation of SC4 with the respective pyrene derivative in basic media (see SI, Scheme S1), as previously reported for the monofunctionalization of SC4 with azobenzene units [46]. The novel macrocyclic receptor is soluble in aqueous solution and presents the characteristic absorption and emission spectra of the pyrene dye (see SI, Figure S5). A pH titration monitored by fluorescence emission (Figure 1A) shows a strong quenching on the pyrene emission when increasing the pH from pH 3 to pH 10. Fitting the fluorescence intensity versus pH data allows the determination of a pK a = 5.6, which can be assigned to deprotonation of one phenol unit in the SC4‐4Py macrocycle. This relatively strong acidity is consistent with the significant stabilization of the resulting phenolate provided by intramolecular hydrogen bonding with the vicinal phenols and in good agreement with what is observed for the parent SCn [47, 48]. Importantly, the observed pH‐dependent quenching is indicative of a PET mechanism from the phenolate to the excited pyrene dye. This is supported by the exergonic Gibbs free energy for the PET process, ΔG = ‐0.5 eV, which can be roughly estimated from the Rehm‐Weller equation [49] using the reduction potential of pyrene (−2.09 V versus SCE) [50], the oxidation potential of the SC4 unit (0.86 V vs Ag/AgCl, 0.83 V vs SCE) [28] and the E 0,0 = 3.45 eV for the singlet excited state of pyrene.

FIGURE 1.

FIGURE 1

– A. Fluorescence spectra of SC4‐4Py at different pH in 5 mM phosphate buffer. B. Direct fluorescence titration of SC4‐4Py (2 µM) with putrescine at pH = 7.4 in 5 mM phosphate buffer.

In order to evaluate the optical response of SC4‐4Py toward relevant analytes, a family of known SC4 guests with biological interest was chosen (Scheme 1). Direct fluorescence titration of SC4‐4Py with putrescine, a biogenic amine known to bind SC4 with µM affinity, caused a gradual quenching of the pyrene emission (see Figure 1B), approaching saturation at ca. 40 µM. The fluorescence intensity vs concentration data can be satisfactorily fitted to a 1:1 host‐guest model with a binding constant of K = 1.6 × 105 M−1, which compares well with the value previously reported for the parent SC4 [29]. Control experiments conducted under acidic conditions (pH = 3.4) showed unsignificant quenching effects upon addition of putrescine, pointing out to the critical importance of the anionic phenolate unit for the sensing mechanism (see SI, Figure S6). Similar fluorescence titration experiments were conducted for choline, acetylcholine and arginine at neutral pH which also resulted in partial quenching of the pyrene fluorescence emission upon binding to SC4‐4Py (see SI, Figure S7). Once again, data fitting retrieved the respective K values for this set of biologically relevant analytes (see Table 1), which align reasonably well with those previously reported for SC4 [19, 24]. In addition, fluorescence titration of SC4‐4Py with the high‐affinity SC4 binder DM‐DABCO [51] led to a K > 1 × 106 M−1 (see SI, Figure S7), further supporting the notion that the recognition properties of SC4 are conserved in SC4‐4Py. To rule out any contribution from complexation‐induced deprotonation of the SC4‐4Py phenol unit to the observed fluorescence quenching, the titration of SC4‐4Py with DM‐DABCO was also performed at pH 10, reproducing the same changes observed at pH 7.4 (see SI, Figure S8).

TABLE 1.

Affinity constants (K / M−1) of the several analytes, obtained by ratiometric IDA (rIDA), by fitting of the ratio between lucigenin and SC4‐4Py emission, and by direct titration of the SC4‐4Py receptor with the analytes and following the resulting quenching of pyrene emission and by ITC, at 25°C. All experiments were carried out in 5 mM phosphate buffer, pH = 7.4. ITC isotherms can be found in the Supplementary Information. The fluorescence switching ratios (as I f/I 0) are also presented.

Analyte K / M−1 a If/I0 K / M−1 b K / M−1 c ΔG / kJmol−1 ΔH / kJmol−1 −TΔS / kJmol−1
L‐Arginine 4.2 × 103 0.64 5.8 × 103 2.6 × 103 −19.5 −17.1 −2.4
Choline 2.0 × 104 0.67 3.9 × 104 1.1 × 104 −23.1 −21.4 −1.7
Acetylcholine 3.3 × 104 0.66 6.8 × 104 1.2 × 104 −23.2 −24.3 1.1
Putrescine 1.6 × 105 0.51 2.7 × 105 1.9 × 105 −30.2 −17.8 −12.4
DM‐DABCO 5.9 × 106 0.43 > 106 3.0 × 106 −37.0 −21.6 −15.4
a

Obtained by ratiometric IDA.

b

Obtained by direct fluorescence titration.

c

Obtained by ITC.

Having demonstrated that SC4‐4Py can be employed for the direct fluorescence detection of typical SC4 guests, we turned our attention to the mechanism behind the observed fluorescence quenching phenomena upon guest binding. Because PET efficiency is distance‐dependent, we anticipated that this quenching could be assigned to structural alterations induced by host‐guest association. The 1H‐NMR spectrum of SC4‐4Py in D2O (see SI, Figure S9) shows significant signal broadening for all aliphatic protons and for part of the aromatic protons assigned to the SC4 moiety, supporting the hypothesis that this calixarene is conformationally mobile, alternating between different conformations at intermediate exchange rate in the 1H‐NMR chemical shifts timescale. Though it was not possible to unequivocally assign the exchanging conformations due to signal broadening, the unusual high stabilization of one phenolate unit of SC4‐4Py (pK a = 5.6, ΔΔG ∼ 20.5 kJ.mol−1) relative to the 4‐hydroxybenzenosulfonate monomer (pK a = 9.2) [48] strongly suggests that the cone and partial cone conformers should predominate, as these structures allow the formation of bifurcated hydrogen bonds with the phenolate oxygen donor. Furthermore, the 1H‐NMR spectrum of SC4‐4Py at 5°C shows two upfield shifted signals in the aliphatic region at 1.4 and 0.1 ppm, indicating that alkyl chain linker is partially included in the pseudo‐aromatic cavity of the partial cone conformer. Finally, it is also worth noting that previous lower rim substituted SC4 derivatives also favor the cone and partial cone conformation [52].

To investigate possible structural changes upon binding, the spherically shaped high‐affinity binder, DM‐DABCO, was selected for 1H‐NMR studies. As can be observed from Figure 2, upon addition of the guest, the signals assigned to the SC4‐4Py become sharp and well resolved, indicating that the initial dynamic structure of the receptor is blocked into a single conformation. Furthermore, the appearance of two pairs of doublets assigned to the axial and equatorial protons of the methylene CH2 bridges of the macrocycle and together with 13C‐NMR signals at 29.59 and 32.48 ppm for same groups (see SI, Figure S10), show that SC4‐4Py adopts a cone conformation upon binding [53]. This conformation was also supported by a ROESY experiment, showing strong ROE cross signals between the equatorial protons of the CH2 bridges and meta protons of the phenolic units (see SI, Figure S12). It is worth noting that, the downfield shifts observed for the signals of the O‐CH2‐Py group and its vicinal aromatic proton upon complexation (blue arrows in Figure 2B), support pseudo‐inclusion of the alkyl chain linker in the partial cone conformation, as discussed above. In addition, the 1H‐NMR spectrum of DM‐DABCO in the presence of 1.3 equiv. of SC4‐4Py clearly shows large upfield shifts (see SI, Figure S13), demonstrating the inclusion of the guest in the aromatic binding pocket of SC4‐4Py.

FIGURE 2.

FIGURE 2

– A. Schematization of the blocking of the cone conformation by guest binding to SC4‐4Py. In the absence of guests, the SC4‐4Py receptor exists in dynamic conformational equilibrium. Please note that no direct experimental evidence supports the deprotonation of this specific phenol unit; it is therefore arbitrary, and any of the other two phenol groups could equally have been chosen for illustrative purposes. B. 1H‐NMR (500 MHz) spectra of SC4‐4Py at 0.2 mM in D2O, in the absence and presence 1.2 equivalents of DM‐DABCO (signals identified by pink squares). A considerable sharpening of the signals assigned to the methylene bridges (blue triangles) and aliphatic chain signals is observed in the presence of the guest, concordant with decrease in flexibility of SC4‐4Py. 1H‐13C HSQC (se SI, Figure S10) shows the methylene bridge carbon chemical shifts between 30 and 32 ppm, which supports the locking of the calixarene in cone formation upon binding the guest.

Although less resolved, due to weaker binding, similar changes in the 1H‐NMR spectrum of SC4‐4Py are observed in the presence of other guests, such as Ach (see Figure S14 in the SI). Overall, this evidence supports the proposed PET mechanism controlled by an induced fit model in which guest binding leads to a conformational alteration of SC4‐4Py, bridging the phenolate unit closer to pyrene dye. This improves PET efficiency, resulting in the observed fluorescence quenching in the presence of guest molecules. It is important to emphasize that the PET mechanism requires short contact distances between the donor and acceptor for efficient quenching, a condition that is much more readily achieved in the cone conformation. This contrasts with, for example, the FRET mechanism, which operates via dipole–dipole interactions and can occur over much longer through‐space distances (typically up to ∼10 nm).

After establishing the mechanism of sensing for the SC4‐4Py, the LCG dye was titrated with this host, yielding almost complete quenching of LCG emission (Figure 3A) under saturation concentrations. The changes in fluorescence intensity were fitted to a 1:1 host‐guest binding model to obtain an affinity constant of K = 1.7 × 107 M−1, which is within the same order of magnitude of those previously reported by our group for other mono‐O‐substituted SC4 [46]. The high affinity of LCG towards SC4‐4Py, the significant quenching observed upon complexation and the fact that both LCG and SC4‐4Py can be simultaneous excited at 340 nm, offered ideal conditions for the construction of a ratiometric IDA (rIDA). Competitive assays were performed with >90% SC4‐4Py‐LCG complex, monitoring both pyrene (360‐400 nm) and lucigenin (450‐600 nm) emissions. Figure 3 B shows the spectroscopic changes observed for the rIDA using putrescine as the analyte (see the SI for analog experiments conducted for the remaining analytes, Figure S16). As observed, the emission of LCG is enhanced upon the addition of putrescine, which promotes its competitive release from the cavity, while the pyrene emission is quenched. This ratiometric signal variation is consistent with a PET‐based quenching mechanism involving both LCG and pyrene dyes. When LCG occupies the SC4‐4Py binding site, PET predominantly targets LCG due to its superior electron‐accepting ability and closer proximity to the phenolate. However, upon its competitive release, PET is redirected toward the pyrene dye, leading to the observed quenching of pyrene emission and the simultaneous enhancement of LCG fluorescence.

FIGURE 3.

FIGURE 3

– A. Direct titration of LCG, 0.19 µM, with SC4‐4Py. B. Displacement assay of putrescine, done with LCG at 0.5 µM and SC4‐4Py at 3 µM and corrected for quenching of LCG emission.

Analysis of the LCG displacement experiments reveal that its emission seems to reach a plateau at lower intensity than expected, most likely due to the documented quenching of this dye by halide anions, present as the counterions of the analytes (see SI, Figure S15) [54]. Nevertheless, the mathematical approach employed to obtain the affinity constants from the ratiometric emission data (I505 nm/I398 nm), was based in a modified version of competitive model that also accounts for anion quenching of LCG emission. As can be observed from Table 1, the K values were in the same order of magnitude of those obtained by direct fluorescence titration of SC4‐4Py, validating the rIDA introduced in this work.

Finally, the binding properties of SC4‐4Py were independently validated by ITC experiments (see SI, Figure S17). The ITC results (see Table 1) are also consistent with the 1:1 host:guest complexes showing binding affinities in reasonable agreement to those obtained by spectroscopic titrations. The thermodynamic parameters demonstrate that the complexation of the investigated guest molecules is enthalpy driven (ΔH values ∼ −20±4 kJ.mol−1), which is consistent with previous reported data for the binding of organic ammonium ions with parent SC4 [16]. Noteworthy, the higher affinity of SC4‐4Py towards the dicationic guests (putrescine and DM‐DABCO) is mostly determined by favorable entropic contributions, which can be tentatively assigned to the release of hydration water molecules upon additional ionic interactions between the oppositely charged groups of the host and guest.

3. Conclusion

To conclude, we introduced a novel sulfonatocalix[4]arene‐pyrene conjugate (SC4‐4Py) which retains the excellent binding properties of the parent sulfonatocalix[4]arene receptor toward biologically relevant analytes, while enabling their direct detection by fluorescence emission. Our design strategy leveraged the intrinsic conformational flexibility of calixarene receptors and the enhanced acidity of their phenolic units. To achieve fluorescence signaling, we employed a bioinspired induced‐fit mechanism, wherein the flexible SC4‐4Py receptor adopts a cone conformation upon guest binding. This conformational transition positions the phenolate unit within the macrocyclic ring closer to the pyrene dye, thereby increasing the efficiency of photoinduced electron transfer (PET) and leading to stronger fluorescence quenching. The SC4‐4Py conjugate was further utilized to construct a self‐assembled chemosensor with the lucigenin dye, enabling dual‐wavelength ratiometric fluorescence sensing of SC4 targets through an indicator displacement assay. Unlike most ratiometric fluorescence chemosensors based on receptor–dye conjugates that operate via Förster resonance energy transfer (FRET), our system relies on a competitive PET process. This strategy offers a simple yet effective alternative to FRET‐based approaches, which are often difficult to implement in SC4‐based systems due to complexation‐induced quenching and aggregation of host–dye complexes commonly observed with this class of receptors. Given the demonstrated potential of the SC4‐4Py conjugate for developing new optical assays and chemosensing schemes, as well as the ease with which our design strategy can be extended to other dye conjugates, we anticipate promising new applications of calixarene‐based receptors in bioimaging and optical sensing.

Supporting Information

The authors have cited additional references within the Supporting Information [55, 56].

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Supporting information

Supporting File 1: chem70685‐sup‐0001‐SuppMat.docx

CHEM-32-e03407-s001.docx (8.1MB, docx)

Acknowledgments

“This work was financed by national funds from FCT—Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia, I.P., under the scope of the project UID/50006/2023 of the Associate Laboratory for Green Chemistry‐ LAQV REQUIMTE. FCT is also acknowledged for supporting the National Portuguese NMR Network (ROTEIRO/0031/2013‐PINFRA/22161/2016, cofinanced by FEDER through COMPETE 2020, POCI, PORL, and FCT through PIDDAC) and for the project 2022.02538.PTDC. J. N. M. acknowledges FCT for the PhD grant (2021.06296.BD).”

Open access publication funding provided by FCT (b‐on).

Data Availability Statement

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

References

  • 1. Krämer J., Kang R., Grimm L. M., De Cola L., Picchetti P., and Biedermann F., “Molecular Probes, Chemosensors, and Nanosensors for Optical Detection of Biorelevant Molecules and Ions in Aqueous Media and Biofluids,” Chemical Reviews 122 (2022): 3459–3636, 10.1021/acs.chemrev.1c00746. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Pinalli R., Pedrini A., and Dalcanale E., “Biochemical Sensing with Macrocyclic Receptors,” Chemical Society Reviews 47 (2018): 7006–7026, 10.1039/C8CS00271A. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Wu J., Kwon B., Liu W., Anslyn E. V., Wang P., and Kim J. S., “Chromogenic/Fluorogenic Ensemble Chemosensing Systems,” Chemical Reviews 115 (2015): 7893–7943, 10.1021/cr500553d. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. You L., Zha D., and Anslyn E. V., “Recent Advances in Supramolecular Analytical Chemistry Using Optical Sensing,” Chemical Reviews 115 (2015): 7840–7892, 10.1021/cr5005524. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Wu D., Sedgwick A. C., Gunnlaugsson T., Akkaya E. U., Yoon J., and James T. D., “Fluorescent Chemosensors: The Past, Present and Future,” Chemical Society Reviews 46 (2017): 7105–7123, 10.1039/C7CS00240H. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Beatty M. A. and Hof F., “Host–guest Binding in Water, Salty Water, and Biofluids: General Lessons for Synthetic, Bio‐targeted Molecular Recognition,” Chemical Society Reviews 50 (2021): 4812–4832, 10.1039/D0CS00495B. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Dsouza R. N., Pischel U., and Nau W. M., “Fluorescent Dyes and Their Supramolecular Host/Guest Complexes With Macrocycles in Aqueous Solution,” Chemical Reviews 111 (2011): 7941–7980, 10.1021/cr200213s. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Zhong W. and Hooley R. J., “Combining Excellent Selectivity with Broad Target Scope: Biosensing With Arrayed Deep Cavitand Hosts,” Accounts of Chemical Research 55 (2022): 1035–1046, 10.1021/acs.accounts.2c00026. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Escobar L. and Ballester P., “Molecular Recognition in Water Using Macrocyclic Synthetic Receptors,” Chemical Reviews 121 (2021): 2445–2514, 10.1021/acs.chemrev.0c00522. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Martins J. N., Lima J. C., and Basílio N., “Selective Recognition of Amino Acids and Peptides by Small Supramolecular Receptors,” Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) 26 (2020): 106, 10.3390/molecules26010106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Biedermann F., Nau W. M., and Schneider H.‐J., “The Hydrophobic Effect Revisited—Studies With Supramolecular Complexes Imply High‐Energy Water as a Noncovalent Driving Force,” Angewandte Chemie International Edition 53 (2014): 11158–11171. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Biedermann F. and Schneider H.‐J., “Experimental Binding Energies in Supramolecular Complexes,” Chemical Reviews 116 (2016): 5216–5300, 10.1021/acs.chemrev.5b00583. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Chen F., Fu R., Gong Z., Li C., Guo D., and Cai K., “Ultrahigh‐Affinity Molecular Recognition in Water and Biomedical Applications,” Angewandte Chemie International Edition 64 (2025): e202500916, 10.1002/anie.202500916. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Shinkai S., Araki K., Matsuda T., et al., “NMR and Crystallographic Studies of a p‐sulfonatocalix[4]Arene‐guest Complex,” Journal of the American Chemical Society 112 (1990): 9053–9058, 10.1021/ja00181a004. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Shinkai S., Araki K., and Manabe O., “NMR Determination of Association Constants for Calixarene Complexes. Evidence for the Formation of a 1:2 Complex With Calix[8]Arene,” Journal of the American Chemical Society 110 (1988): 7214–7215, 10.1021/ja00229a046. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Guo D.‐S., Wang K., and Liu Y., “Selective Binding Behaviors of p‐sulfonatocalixarenes in Aqueous Solution,” Journal of Inclusion Phenomena and Macrocyclic Chemistry 62 (2008): 1–21, 10.1007/s10847-008-9452-2. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Guo D.‐S. and Liu Y., “Supramolecular Chemistry of p ‐Sulfonatocalix[ n]Arenes and Its Biological Applications,” Accounts of Chemical Research 47 (2014): 1925–1934, 10.1021/ar500009g. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Perret F. and Coleman A. W., “Biochemistry of Anionic Calix[n]Arenes,” Chemical Communications 47 (2011): 7303. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Romero M. A., Mateus P., Matos B., et al., “Binding of Flavylium Ions to Sulfonatocalix[4]Arene and Implication in the Photorelease of Biologically Relevant Guests in Water,” Journal of Organic Chemistry 84 (2019): 10852–10859, 10.1021/acs.joc.9b01420. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Beshara C. S., Jones C. E., Daze K. D., Lilgert B. J., and Hof F., “A Simple Calixarene Recognizes Post‐translationally Methylated Lysine,” Chembiochem 11 (2009): 63–66, 10.1002/cbic.200900633. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Pan Y.‐C., Barba‐Bon A., Tian H.‐W., et al., “An Amphiphilic Sulfonatocalix[5]arene as an Activator for Membrane Transport of Lysine‐rich Peptides and Proteins,” Angewandte Chemie International Edition 60 (2021): 1875–1882, 10.1002/anie.202011185. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Peng S., Barba‐Bon A., Pan Y.‐C., Nau W. M., Guo D.‐S., and Hennig A., “Phosphorylation‐Responsive Membrane Transport of Peptides,” Angewandte Chemie International Edition 56 (2017): 15742–15745, 10.1002/anie.201707979. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Koh K. N., Araki K., Ikeda A., Otsuka H., and Shinkai S., “Reinvestigation of Calixarene‐Based Artificial‐Signaling Acetylcholine Receptors Useful in Neutral Aqueous (Water/Methanol) Solution,” Journal of the American Chemical Society 118 (1996): 755–758, 10.1021/ja951488k. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Bakirci H. and Nau W. M., “Fluorescence Regeneration as a Signaling Principle for Choline and Carnitine Binding: A Refined Supramolecular Sensor System Based on a Fluorescent Azoalkane,” Advanced Functional Materials 16 (2006): 237–242, 10.1002/adfm.200500219. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Korbakov N., Timmerman P., Lidich N., Urbach B., Sa'ar A., and Yitzchaik S., “Acetylcholine Detection at Micromolar Concentrations with the Use of an Artificial Receptor‐Based Fluorescence Switch,” Langmuir 24 (2008): 2580–2587, 10.1021/la703010z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26. Zhang Y.‐J., Cao W.‐X., and Xu J., “Interaction of Sulfonated Calix[ n]Arenes with Rhodamine B and Its Application to Determine Acetylcholine in a Real Neutral Aqueous Medium,” Chinese Journal of Chemistry 20 (2002): 322–326, 10.1002/cjoc.20020200406. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 27. Jin T., “A New Fluorometric Method for the Detection of the Neurotransmitter Acetylcholine in Water Using a Dansylcholine Complex with p‐Sulfonated Calix[8]Arene,” Journal of inclusion phenomena and macrocyclic chemistry 45 (2003): 195–201, 10.1023/A:1024506714332. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 28. Guo D.‐S., Uzunova V. D., Su X., Liu Y., and Nau W. M., “Operational Calixarene‐based Fluorescent Sensing Systems for Choline and Acetylcholine and Their Application to Enzymatic Reactions,” Chemical Science 2 (2011): 1722–1734, 10.1039/c1sc00231g. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 29. Pires A. S., Droguett Muñoz K., de Freitas V., Basílio N., and Cruz L., “Host–Guest Chemosensor Ensembles based on Water‐Soluble Sulfonated Calix[ n ]arenes and a Pyranoflavylium Dye for the Optical Detection of Biogenic Amines,” Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 72 (2024): 3719–3729, 10.1021/acs.jafc.3c08695. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30. Basílio N., Piñeiro Á., Da Silva J. P., and García‐Río L., “Cooperative Assembly of Discrete Stacked Aggregates Driven by Supramolecular Host–Guest Complexation,” Journal of Organic Chemistry 78 (2013): 9113–9119. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31. Wiskur S. L., Ait‐Haddou H., Lavigne J. J., and Anslyn E. V., “Teaching Old Indicators New Tricks,” Accounts of Chemical Research 34 (2001): 963–972, 10.1021/ar9600796. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32. Sedgwick A. C., Brewster J. T., Wu T., et al., “Indicator Displacement Assays (IDAs): The Past, Present and Future,” Chemical Society Reviews 50 (2021): 9–38, 10.1039/C9CS00538B. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33. Hennig A., Bakirci H., and Nau W. M., “Label‐free Continuous Enzyme Assays with Macrocycle‐fluorescent Dye Complexes,” Nature Methods 4 (2007): 629–632, 10.1038/nmeth1064. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34. Barba‐Bon A., Pan Y.‐C., Biedermann F., Guo D.‐S., Nau W. M., and Hennig A., “Fluorescence Monitoring of Peptide Transport Pathways Into Large and Giant Vesicles by Supramolecular Host–Dye Reporter Pairs,” Journal of the American Chemical Society 141 (2019): 20137–20145. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35. Pangeni S., Prajapati J. D., Bafna J., et al., “Large‐Peptide Permeation Through a Membrane Channel: Understanding Protamine Translocation Through CymA from Klebsiella Oxytoca **,” Angewandte Chemie International Edition 60 (2021): 8089–8094, 10.1002/anie.202016943. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36. Norouzy A., Azizi Z., and Nau W. M., “Indicator Displacement Assays Inside Live Cells,” Angewandte Chemie International Edition 54 (2015): 792–795, 10.1002/anie.201407808. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37. Beatty M. A., Borges‐González J., Sinclair N. J., Pye A. T., and Hof F., “Analyte‐Driven Disassembly and Turn‐On Fluorescent Sensing in Competitive Biological Media,” Journal of the American Chemical Society 140 (2018): 3500–3504, 10.1021/jacs.7b13298. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38. Beatty M. A., Selinger A. J., Li Y., and Hof F., “Parallel Synthesis and Screening of Supramolecular Chemosensors That Achieve Fluorescent Turn‐On Detection of Drugs in Saliva,” Journal of the American Chemical Society 141 (2019): 16763–16771, 10.1021/jacs.9b07073. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39. Huang X., Song J., Yung B. C., Huang X., Xiong Y., and Chen X., “Ratiometric Optical Nanoprobes Enable Accurate Molecular Detection and Imaging,” Chemical Society Reviews 47 (2018): 2873–2920, 10.1039/C7CS00612H. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40. Lee M. H., Kim J. S., and Sessler J. L., “Small Molecule‐based Ratiometric Fluorescence Probes for Cations, Anions, and Biomolecules,” Chemical Society Reviews 44 (2015): 4185–4191, 10.1039/C4CS00280F. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41. Zhang S., Assaf K. I., Huang C., Hennig A., and Nau W. M., “Ratiometric DNA Sensing With a Host–guest FRET Pair,” Chemical Communications 55 (2019): 671–674. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42. Kim K. L., Sung G., Sim J., et al., “Supramolecular Latching System Based on Ultrastable Synthetic Binding Pairs as Versatile Tools for Protein Imaging,” Nature Communications 9 (2018): 1712, 10.1038/s41467-018-04161-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43. Sierra A. F., Hernández‐Alonso D., Romero M. A., González‐Delgado J. A., Pischel U., and Ballester P., “Optical Supramolecular Sensing of Creatinine,” Journal of the American Chemical Society 142 (2020): 4276–4284, 10.1021/jacs.9b12071. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44. Guo D.‐S., Jiang B.‐P., Wang X., and Liu Y., “Calixarene‐induced Aggregation of Perylene Bisimides,” Organic & Biomolecular Chemistry 10 (2012): 720–723, 10.1039/C2OB06973C. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45. Wang K., Guo D.‐S., and Liu Y., “Temperature‐Controlled Supramolecular Vesicles Modulated by p ‐Sulfonatocalix[5]Arene with Pyrene,” Chem—A Eur J 16 (2010): 8006–8011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46. Martins J. N., Raimundo B., Rioboo A., Folgar‐Cameán Y., Montenegro J., and Basílio N., “Photoswitchable Calixarene Activators for Controlled Peptide Transport Across Lipid Membranes,” Journal of the American Chemical Society 145 (2023): 13126–13133, 10.1021/jacs.3c01829. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47. Arena G., Cali R., Lombardo G. G., et al., “Water Soluble Calix[4]Arenes. A Thermodynamic Investigation of Proton Complex Formation,” Supramolecular Chemistry 1 (1992): 19–24, 10.1080/10610279208027437. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 48. Suga K., Ohzono T., Negishi M., Deuchi K., and Morita Y., “Effect of Various Cations on the Acidity of p ‐sulfonatocalixarenes,” Supramolecular Science 5 (1998): 9–14, 10.1016/S0968-5677(97)00074-6. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 49. Rehm D. and Weller A., “Kinetics of Fluorescence Quenching by Electron and H‐Atom Transfer,” Israel Journal of Chemistry 8 (1970): 259–271, 10.1002/ijch.197000029. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 50. Kubota T., Kano K., Uno B., and Konse T., “Energetics of the Sequential Electroreduction and Electrooxidation Steps of Benzenoid Hydrocarbons,” Bulletin of the Chemical Society of Japan 60 (1987): 3865–3877, 10.1246/bcsj.60.3865. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 51. Zhao H.‐X., Guo D.‐S., and Liu Y., “Binding Behaviors of p ‐Sulfonatocalix[4]Arene With Gemini Guests,” Journal of Physical Chemistry B 117 (2013): 1978–1987, 10.1021/jp312744d. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52. Shaurya A., Garnett G. A. E., Starke M. J., et al., “An Easily Accessible, Lower Rim Substituted Calix[4]Arene Selectively Binds N, N ‐dimethyllysine,” Organic & Biomolecular Chemistry 19 (2021): 4691–4696, 10.1039/D1OB00524C. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53. Jaime C., De Mendoza J., Prados P., Nieto P. M., and Sanchez C., “Carbon‐13 NMR Chemical Shifts. A Single Rule to Determine the Conformation of Calix[4]Arenes,” Journal of Organic Chemistry 56 (1991): 3372–3376, 10.1021/jo00010a036. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 54. Legg K. D. and Hercules D. M., “Quenching of Lucigenin Fluorescence,” Journal of Physical Chemistry 74 (1970): 2114–2118, 10.1021/j100909a011. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 55. Basilio N., García‐Río L., and Martín‐Pastor M., “Counterion Binding in Solutions of p ‐Sulfonatocalix[4]Arene,” Journal of Physical Chemistry B 114 (2010): 7201–7206, 10.1021/jp101474a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56. Dai Q., Liu W., Zhuang X., Wu J., Zhang H., and Wang P., “Ratiometric Fluorescence Sensor Based on a Pyrene Derivative and Quantification Detection of Heparin in Aqueous Solution and Serum,” Analytical Chemistry 83 (2011): 6559–6564, 10.1021/ac2008724. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supporting File 1: chem70685‐sup‐0001‐SuppMat.docx

CHEM-32-e03407-s001.docx (8.1MB, docx)

Data Availability Statement

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.


Articles from Chemistry (Weinheim an Der Bergstrasse, Germany) are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES