The authors regret that errors appeared in Figure 4a and 6d in the original publication of this article due to an oversight during manuscript formatting and image assembly. In Figure 4a, the hydrogen peroxide fluorescence image of the LRh group was inadvertently used as the image for the gel@F-LRh group. In Figure 6d, the immunofluorescence staining image of the entire LRh group was inadvertently used as that of the gel@LRh group. The incorrect images of the LRh group in Figure 4a and 6d have been replaced with the correct images based on the original data. The corrected Figure 4 and 6 are presented below. The authors confirm that these errors do not affect the original results or the scientific conclusions of the study.
Fig. 4.Multi-functional properties of gel@F-LRh. (a) ROS scavenging activity of the living hydrogel on macrophages; Polarization effect of macrophages via (b) immunofluorescence examination and (c) flow cytometry assay; Antibacterial activity of gel@F-LRh by (d) dilution coating plate method, (e) Oxford cup method: A) nafcillin, B) LRh, C) gel@F-LRh, D) gel@LRh, and E)gel containing Na2SeO3.(f) biofilm assay, and (g) SEM examination; (h) △TEWL analysis of SC detachment in a mouse model treated with F-LRh; (i) ATR-FTIR examination of mouseskin samples.
Fig. 6.Regulatory effect of gel@F-LRh on the inflammatory microenvironment of wounds. Immunohistochemical analysis of the wound content for (a) iNOS and (b) CD206; (c) Heatmap analysis from ELISA assays; (d) Immunofluorescence analysis of TNF-α, IL-6, VEGF, and MMP-9 levels in the wounds; (e) Western blot analysis of the PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway in the wound sites; (f) Grayscale analysis of the proteins(n = 3, mean ± SD),∗p < 0.05, ∗∗p < 0.01, ∗∗∗p < 0.001.
The authors would like to apologise for any inconvenience caused.
Contributor Information
Yuan Liu, Email: liuyuan513@kust.edu.cn.
Qiling Zhang, Email: zhangql@kust.edu.cn.
Chengxiao Wang, Email: wcx1192002@126.com.


