Abstract
Background
The gut microbiota is a key modulator of immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) efficacy, yet the contribution of the gut virome remains poorly defined, particularly in advanced non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Here, we characterized the gut virome and explored its potential role in shaping response to PD-1 blockade.
Methods
We performed metagenomic virome profiling of fecal samples from 338 advanced NSCLC patients treated with PD-1 inhibitors and evaluated model generalizability in an independent external cohort (n = 30). Viral diversity, taxonomic composition, and functional potential were analyzed. Virus–bacteria co-occurrence networks were constructed, and random forest classifiers were developed to predict treatment response.
Results
Viral Shannon diversity decreased progressively with poorer clinical response, and β-diversity analyses revealed distinct virome community structures between responders (R) and non-responders (NR). Differential abundance analysis identified 194 NR-enriched vOTUs, predominantly assigned to Peduoviridae and Inoviridae, and 594 R-enriched vOTUs, mainly from Herelleviridae and Microviridae. Host prediction indicated that NR-enriched vOTUs frequently targeted bacterial genera such as Clostridium_M, Bacteroides, and Escherichia, whereas R-enriched vOTUs targeted beneficial genera such as Faecalibacterium and Roseburia. Network analyses further revealed response-specific virus–bacteria interaction modules. Functional profiling showed that NR-enriched vOTUs were associated with metabolic functions, including K01689 (eno; enolase). A virus-only random forest model outperformed a bacterium-only model in predicting response (area under the curve [AUC] = 0.768 vs. 0.664) and maintained superior performance in the external cohort (AUC = 0.742). In addition, Akkermansia muciniphila positivity was associated with a higher-diversity, responder-favorable virome configuration.
Conclusions
The gut virome undergoes marked remodeling during anti–PD-1 therapy in advanced NSCLC and displays distinct taxonomic, ecological, and functional signatures associated with clinical outcome. These findings support the gut virome as a strong predictor of ICI response and highlight its potential as both a biomarker and a therapeutic target.
Supplementary Information
The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12967-026-07900-0.
Keywords: Non-small cell lung cancer, Immune checkpoint inhibitors, PD-1 blockade, Gut virome, Bacteriophage, Akkermansia muciniphila
Introduction
Lung cancer is a leading malignancy worldwide, with approximately 2.48 million new cases in 2024, accounting for about one-eighth of all cancers [1]. Non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) constitutes 80–85% of all lung cancer cases and is characterized by poor prognosis, exhibiting one of the lowest five-year survival rates among solid tumors [2, 3]. Since early-stage NSCLC is typically asymptomatic, most patients are diagnosed at an advanced or metastatic stage, which limits opportunities for curative treatment [3]. Although conventional cytotoxic chemotherapy long served as the primary treatment, the introduction of targeted therapies and immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) has substantially improved survival in selected patient subgroups [4–7]. In particular, ICIs targeting the programmed cell death protein 1/programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-1/PD-L1) axis have reshaped the therapeutic landscape for advanced NSCLC [8, 9]. However, only about 20–30% of patients derive durable clinical benefit, while the majority develop primary or acquired resistance [10, 11], underscoring the need to identify biomarkers and mechanisms that influence treatment response.
In recent years, the gut microbiota has attracted considerable attention as a key modulator of host immunity and a determinant of ICI efficacy. Several studies have demonstrated that specific bacterial taxa, such as Bifidobacterium, can positively regulate antitumor immunity in vivo [12]. Patients enriched with Ruminococcaceae and Faecalibacterium exhibit enhanced systemic and intratumoral immune responses, characterized by more effective antigen presentation and more robust effector T-cell functions in both the peripheral circulation and the tumor microenvironment [13]. In NSCLC patients, Akkermansia muciniphila (Akk) has been consistently associated with favorable responses to PD-1 blockade, underscoring the significant impact of host–microbiome interactions on immunotherapy outcomes [14].
In contrast to the rapidly expanding literature on gut bacteria, research on the gut virome remains relatively limited, particularly with respect to bacteriophages, which constitute its dominant component. Accumulating evidence indicates that bacteriophages can shape bacterial community composition and metabolic activity, modulate mucosal immune homeostasis, and thereby potentially influence host antitumor immunity [15, 16]. However, whether and how the gut virome influences the response to ICIs in patients with NSCLC remains to be systematically elucidated.
To address this gap, we integrated fecal metagenomic sequencing data and clinical information from two cohorts of NSCLC patients treated with PD-1 inhibitors. We reanalyzed the primary cohort of 338 samples [14] and used an independent dataset of 30 samples [17] as an external validation set for the random forest model, aiming to characterize virome alterations associated with treatment response. Furthermore, we investigated the interactions between Akkermansia muciniphila and gut viruses to uncover potential virus–bacteria interplay that may influence immunotherapy outcomes. Our study provided novel insights into the underappreciated role of the gut virome in shaping the efficacy of immune checkpoint blockade.
Materials and methods
Sample information and preprocessing
This study analyzed a total of 368 fecal metagenomic samples collected from patients with advanced NSCLC receiving ICI therapy, sourced from two independent clinical cohorts (Table S1). The primary cohort consisted of 338 patients with histologically confirmed advanced NSCLC enrolled in a clinical study investigating the association between gut microbiota and ICI efficacy [14]. Based on RECIST 1.1 criteria [18], treatment responses were categorized as follows: 75 patients achieved complete or partial response (CR/PR), 102 had stable disease (SD), and 161 had progressive disease (PD). Accordingly, the cohort was stratified into 75 responders and 263 non-responders (comprising 102 SD and 161 PD cases). Patients received standard ICI therapies, including nivolumab or atezolizumab as second-line treatment following platinum-based chemotherapy failure, or pembrolizumab—either as monotherapy or combined with chemotherapy—for those with PD-L1 expression ≥ 1%.
The validation cohort comprised 30 patients with advanced NSCLC who received ICI treatment between 2019 and 2020. This cohort included 11 patients with CR/PR, 7 with SD, and 12 with PD. Treatment involved first-line pembrolizumab monotherapy or second-line nivolumab or atezolizumab.
Raw metagenomic sequencing data from both cohorts were obtained from the Sequence Read Archive (SRA) of the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI). The corresponding BioProject accession numbers are PRJNA751792 and PRJNA1068493 respectively. Quality control of raw sequencing reads was conducted using fastp with parameters “-u 30 -q 20 -l 60 -y -trim_poly_g” [19]. High-quality reads were subsequently aligned to the human reference genome GRCh38 using Bowtie2 [20] to remove host-derived sequences.
Gut virome analysis
We constructed a comprehensive gut virome reference catalog, termed the Chinese Gut Virome Catalog (cnGVC) [21], which was built from over 10,000 publicly available human fecal metagenomic datasets and comprises more than 90,000 non-redundant viral operational taxonomic units (vOTUs). High-quality reads from all samples were aligned against the cnGVC database using Bowtie2 [20], with viral species-level delineation defined at 95% nucleotide identity.
To generate vOTU abundance profiles for each fecal sample, reads mapped to each vOTU was counted and normalized by the total number of mapped reads per sample to obtain relative abundances. Relative abundances of vOTUs belonging to the same viral family were subsequently aggregated to determine family-level viral abundance.
Functional annotation of viral proteins was performed using DIAMOND [22], against the Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) database [23], with the parameters “–query-cover 50 –subject-cover 50 -e 1e-5 –min-score 50 –max-target-seqs 50”. Each protein was assigned to a KEGG Ortholog (KO) identifier based on the top-scoring hit in the database.
Host prediction was performed using both CRISPR spacer matching and homology-based approaches. Specifically, CRISPR-based host assignments were inferred from spacer–vOTU alignments identified by BLASTn (bit score ≥ 45 with full-length coverage). Homology-based predictions were derived from BLASTn alignments between vOTUs and prokaryotic genomes showing ≥ 90% nucleotide identity across ≥ 30% of the vOTU length. These curated host annotations were subsequently used for downstream functional and host-association analyses in this study.
Gut bacteriome analysis
Taxonomic profiling of bacterial communities was performed on all fecal metagenomes using MetaPhlAn4 [24]. The relative abundances of microbial tax were estimated and subsequently aggregated at the genus and species levels to generate comprehensive taxonomic profiles.
Functional comparison of responder- and non-responder-enriched vOtus
For each KOs, its prevalence within the responder (R) or non-responder (NR) group was calculated as the proportion of vOTUs encoding that KO relative to the total number of vOTUs in the group. Fisher’s exact test was performed using the fisher.test function in the R platform to assess whether the prevalence of each KO differed significantly between R and NR groups. KOs with p-values < 0.05 were considered significantly different prevalent.
Statistical analysis
All statistical analyses and visualizations were performed in the R platform unless otherwise specified. Alpha-diversity indices, including the Shannon index and Simpson index, were computed using the diversity function in the vegan package [25], while observed vOTU numbers were calculated using the specnumber function. Differences in alpha-diversity between groups were assessed using two-tailed Wilcoxon rank-sum tests. Beta-diversity was assessed based on Bray–Curtis dissimilarities, calculated with the vegdist function. Principal coordinate analysis (PCoA) was conducted on the Bray–Curtis distances using the cmdscale function in vegan. Permutational multivariate analysis of variance (PERMANOVA) with 999 permutations was performed using the adonis2 function (vegan package) to test for compositional differences between groups.
Differential abundance analysis of microbial features (viruses and bacteria) was performed using microbiome multivariate association with linear models (MaAsLin2), adjusting for potential confounders (sex, age, and antibiotic exposure) [26]. Using the R group as the reference, comparisons were made between R vs. SD (stable disease) and R vs. PD (progressive disease). Only features with a minimum relative abundance > 0.01% and a prevalence > 10% were retained for analysis, and the MaAsLin2 model was specified as “CPLM”. For each microbial feature, the two p-values from the R vs. SD and R vs. PD comparisons were combined using Fisher’s method. Features present in both comparisons with a combined p-value < 0.05 were considered differentially abundant between R and NR group.
Correlations between significantly altered gut viruses and bacteria were evaluated using Spearman’s rank correlation. Correlation pairs with an absolute coefficient |ρ| > 0.6 and p-value < 0.05 were retained for network construction and visualized using the ggraph package.
Random forest models were built using viral markers, bacterial markers, or a combination of both. Model training was followed by 10-fold cross-validation. Model performance was evaluated based on the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), calculated with the roc function. Feature importance was ranked using the importance function. The robustness of the optimal model was further validated using the independent validation cohort.
Results
Altered gut virome diversity and composition across clinical response groups
To investigate differences in the gut virome among advanced NSCLC patients with distinct clinical outcomes (R, SD, and PD), we first compared α-diversity at the vOTU level using the Shannon index, Simpson index, and observed vOTU numbers (Fig. 1A). Both the SD and PD groups exhibited significantly lower Shannon diversity than the R group (p < 0.05), with the lowest values observed in PD and the highest in R, indicating stepwise reduction in viral community diversity associated with poorer clinical outcomes. We next conducted PCoA and PERMANOVA based on Bray–Curtis dissimilarities. The first two principal coordinates explained 6.2% and 10% of the total variance, respectively, and PERMANOVA confirmed that clinical response status had a significant effect on overall virome composition (adonis, p < 0.05; Fig. 1B). These findings suggest a marked disruption of the gut virome in individuals with less favorable treatment responses. At the viral family level, stacked bar plots showed that Microviridae and Winoviridae were the most dominant families across all three groups (Fig. 1C).
Fig. 1.
Gut virome diversity and structure across clinical response groups. A box plots showing Shannon (left), Simpson (middle), and observed vOTU numbers (right) across the responders (R), stable disease (SD), and progressive disease (PD) groups. Statistical significance is assessed using Wilcoxon rank-sum tests. Asterisks denote significance levels as follows: *, p < 0.05; **, p < 0.01; and ***, p < 0.001. B PCoA plots based on Bray–Curtis distances illustrating virome compositional differences across the three clinical groups. PERMANOVA is used to evaluate statistical significance. C stacked bar plots displaying viral family–level compositions across R, SD, and PD individuals, only the top 10 most abundant viral families are displayed
Identification of viral signatures of different clinical response groups
To identify virome signatures associated with differential clinical responses to PD-1 inhibitor therapy in advanced NSCLC, we performed differential abundance analyses using MaAsLin2 with the R group as the reference, adjusting for sex, age, and antibiotic exposure. At the family level, Crevaviridae was the only viral family that differed significantly in both the R vs. SD and R vs. PD comparisons (p < 0.05; Fig. 2A). Fisher’s combined test further confirmed its significant association when comparing the R group to the combined NR groups (combined p < 0.05; Fig. 2B).
Fig. 2.
Differential viral families, vOTUs, and predicted hosts associated with clinical outcomes. A Bar plot showing the relative abundance of Crevaviridae, the only viral family significantly different in both R vs. SD and R vs. PD comparisons based on MaAsLin2. Asterisks denote significance levels as follows: *, p < 0.05; **, p < 0.01; and ***, p < 0.001. B Bar plot displaying combined significance (Fisher’s method) of crevaviridae between R and NR individuals. C volcano showing the numbers of R-enriched (n = 594) and NR-enriched (n = 194) vOTUs identified through MaAsLin2 after covariate adjustment. D pie charts displaying the taxonomic distribution of R-enriched and NR-enriched vOTUs at the family level. E Bar plots showing predicted bacterial host genera for R- and NR-enriched vOTUs. Viruses predicted to infect multiple genera are labeled as “multiple.”
We then conducted MaAsLin2 at the vOTU level using the same covariate adjustments. After combining the p-values from the R vs. SD and R vs. PD comparisons, a total of 194 vOTUs were found to be significantly enriched in the NR group, whereas 594 vOTUs were enriched in the R group (combined p < 0.05; Fig. 2C; Table S2). Taxonomically, NR-enriched vOTUs predominantly belonged to the families Peduoviridae and Inoviridae, while R-enriched vOTUs were largely affiliated with Herelleviridae and Microviridae (Fig. 2D).
Host prediction analyses revealed that 86.7% of R-enriched vOTUs were bacteriophages, with predicted bacterial hosts mainly from Ruminococcus_D (n = 45), Faecalibacterium (n = 34), Roseburia (n = 19), Bacteroides (n = 16), and Blautia_A (n = 14) (Table S3). In contrast, 75.6% of NR-enriched vOTUs were predicted to be bacteriophages targeting bacterial genera such as Clostridium_M (n = 26), Bacteroides (n = 20), and Escherichia (n = 11) (Fig. 2E). Notably, no R-enriched vOTUs were predicted to infect Escherichia, whereas no NR-enriched vOTUs were predicted to target Ruminococcus_D, suggesting fundamentally different virus–host ecological structures between R and NR.
Altered bacterium–virus co-abundance networks between R and NR
To identify bacterial features for network construction, we first performed differential abundance analysis. Using MaAsLin2 with the R group as reference and adjusting for sex, age, and antibiotic use, we identified 71 bacterial species that were significantly differentially abundant between R and NR groups (Table S4).
To investigate differences in virus–bacteria interactions differ between patients with distinct clinical response, we constructed co-occurrence networks for the R and NR groups based on Spearman correlation (|ρ| > 0.6, p < 0.05). Topological analysis showed that the R network consisted of 228 nodes and 204 edges, with an average degree of 1.964 and an average path length of 1.964. The NR network contained 212 nodes and 190 edges, with both the average degree and average path length equal to 1.960 (Fig. 3A–B; Table S5).
Fig. 3.
Cross-kingdom co-occurrence networks between NR-associated vOTUs and bacterial species. A, B network visualization of correlations between differential vOTUs and bacterial species. Correlations were assessed using Spearman’s correlation coefficient, and only significant associations (|ρ| > 0.60, p < 0.05) are displayed. Triangles represent bacterial species, circles represent vOTUs. The text in the middle of the network diagram represents comparison of network topological metrics, including node number, edge number, average path length, and average node degree. C, D Bar plots showing the top 20 taxa with the highest degree in R (C) and NR-associated networks. E Bar plots showing the relationships between differential vOTUs and bacterial families. The left panels distinguish between shared associations and those unique to R or NR networks, while the right panels indicate the number of vOTUs enriched in R or NR with each bacterial family
Comparison of node connectivity revealed that 20 features displayed higher degrees in the NR network, including bacterial nodes such as Enterocloster aldensis and Enterocloster bolteae, and viral nodes such as v10923 and v05571, suggesting distinct virus–bacterium ecological organization between R and NR (Fig. 3C–D).
We next compared the shared and group-specific vOTUs associated with bacterial families across the two networks (Fig. 3E). Overall, most vOTUs were shared between the R and NR groups. For Lachnospiraceae and Erysipelotrichaceae, vOTUs were largely shared but also included network-specific subsets in both groups, with more Lachnospiraceae-associated vOTUs uniquely observed in the R network than in the NR network. Notably, among vOTUs related to Ruminococcaceae, a distinct subset of associated vOTUs was unique to the R network, whereas all Ruminococcaceae-associated vOTUs observed in the NR network were shared between the two groups.
Regarding enrichment patterns, vOTUs related to Tannerellaceae, Enterobacteriaceae, and Erysipelotrichaceae tend to be enriched in the NR groups, while vOTUs related to most other bacterial families were primarily enriched in the R group. Consistently, the NR network also contained a higher proportion of NR-enriched vOTUs, with Lachnospiraceae-associated vOTUs showing a greater enrichment ratio in NR than in R.
Functional annotation of differential vOTUs
To explore the potential functional mechanisms of the gut virome associated with ICIs outcomes in advanced NSCLC, we performed KEGG functional annotation on the 788 differentially abundant vOTUs identified in the previous analyses. A total of 17 KOs showed significant differences in their prevalence between the R and NR groups (Fisher’s exact test, p < 0.05; Fig. 4A; Table S6).
Fig. 4.
Differential functional potential of the gut virome between NR and R groups. A volcano plot showing the log2 Fold change of significant KEGG orthologs (KOs) between the two groups. B occurrence rates of 17 differential viral functions identified in R-enriched and NR-enriched vOTUs. Statistical significance was determined using Fisher’s exact test, with p < 0.05 considered significant. Significance levels are indicated as follows: *, p < 0.05; **, p < 0.01; and ***, p < 0.001
Among these, only one KO term (K01449) occurred more frequently in the R group and was therefore classified as R-enriched. All remaining KO terms were detected more frequently in the NR group and were classified as NR-enriched (Fig. 4B). Most NR-enriched KOs encoded metabolic functions, including enzymes involved in amino acid metabolism (e.g., asparagine synthase, K01953), central carbohydrate metabolism (e.g., enolase, K01689), and cofactor/vitamin biosynthesis (e.g., a folate biosynthesis enzyme, K01737, and a vitamin B12/porphyrin-related enzyme, K09883). Notably, the NR group also showed enrichment of UDP-glucuronic acid 4-epimerase (K08679), a key enzyme involved in O-antigen nucleotide-sugar biosynthesis. In contrast, the only R-enriched function was a cell-wall hydrolase (K01449), suggesting enhanced phage-encoded lytic activity that may preferentially target clinically detrimental bacteria and thereby contribute to favorable treatment responses.
Predictive performance of gut viral and bacterial profiles for immunotherapy response
We next built random forest classification models with 10-fold cross-validation to assess the predictive performance of viral, bacterial, and combined virus–bacteria profiles in distinguishing clinical outcomes (R vs. NR) among advanced NSCLC patients treated with PD-1 blockade. In the discovery cohort, the model based solely on viral features demonstrated the highest discriminative power (AUC = 76.8%, 95% CI: 74.3%–79.2%), followed by the combined model (AUC = 76.2%, 95% CI: 73.7%–78.7%), whereas the bacterium-only model showed the lowest performance (AUC = 66.4%, 95% CI: 63.6%–69.1%) (Fig. 5A–B). Feature importance analysis revealed that the top 20 predictors in both the virus-only and combined models consisted predominantly of viral taxa enriched in the R group. In the combined model, most of the important features were viral, with only three bacterial features ranking among the top predictors (Fig. 5C).
Fig. 5.
Gut virome-based and gut bacterial-based classification of R and NR individuals. A line chart showing the average AUC values of random forest models constructed with increasing numbers of features. B receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves of classifiers built on bacterial, viral, and combined features, with corresponding AUC values indicated. C Bar plots illustrating the top 20 most important features identified by the random forest models: combined bacterial mode(left), viral model (right). D ROC curves showing external validation results using an independent cohort, with the virus-only model exhibiting the highest performance
To evaluate model generalizability, we validated all three models in an independent external cohort. Consistent with the discovery cohort, the virus-only model again yielded the best predictive performance (AUC = 74.2%, 95% CI: 53.6%–94.7%), followed by the combined model (AUC = 70.8%, 95% CI: 52.6%–89.1%) and the bacterium-only model (AUC = 67.0%, 95% CI: 46.7%–87.3%) (Fig. 5D).
Association between Akk colonization status and gut virome structure
To further investigate the potential influence of Akk on gut virome structure, we stratified samples based on its presence (Akk-positive) or absence of Akk (Akk-negative) and compared their virome profiles. At the vOTU level, α-diversity indices—including the Shannon, Simpson, and observed vOTUs numbers)—were significantly higher in Akk-positive individuals, indicating greater viral richness and diversity compared to Akk-negative subjects (Fig. 6A; Table S7). We next assessed overall community structure using PCoA based on Bray–Curtis distance. The first two principal coordinates (PCo1 and PCo2) explained 10% and 6.2% of the variance, respectively. PERMANOVA analysis confirmed a significant separation of virome composition between the Akk-positive and Akk-negative groups (R2 = 0.008, p = 0.002; Fig. 6B).
Fig. 6.
Virome differences between Akk+ (Akk-positive) and Akk–(Akk-negative) individuals. A box plots comparing Shannon(left), Simpson(middle), and observed vOTU numbers(right) between Akk+ and Akk – individuals. Statistical significance is assessed using Wilcoxon tests. Asterisks denote significance levels as follows: *, p < 0.05; **, p < 0.01; and ***, p < 0.001. B PCoA plot based on Bray–Curtis distances illustrating compositional separation between Akk+ and Akk – groups, evaluated using PERMANOVA. C stacked bar plots showing viral family–level compositions in Akk+ and Akk – individual. D volcano plot showing significant vOTUs (p < 0.05) identified by MaAsLin2 when comparing Akk+ and Akk – individuals. This analysis was performed on the 788 vOTUs previously identified as significantly different between the R and NR groups, adjusting for age, sex, and antibiotic use
At the viral family level, both groups were dominated by Microviridae and Winoviridae. However, Akk-positive individuals exhibited higher relative abundances of Herelleviridae and Suoliviridae, whereas Peduoviridae and Inoviridae were enriched in Akk-negative samples (Fig. 6C).
To further characterize virome features associated with Akk status, we restricted the analysis the 788 response-associated vOTUs previously identified as differentially abundant between clinical outcomes groups. Afte reanalyzing these vOTUs using MaAsLin2 while adjusting for age, sex, and antibiotic use, Akk-positive and Akk-negative samples remained clearly separated based on this subset of vOTUs (Fig. 6D), suggesting that Akk colonization is independently associated with gut virome composition.
Discussion
Accumulating evidence indicates that the gut microbiome as a key modulator of antitumor immunity and clinical response to ICIs in advanced NSCLC [27–29]. However, although bacterial components have been extensively investigated, the gut virome remains comparatively understudied, despite being dominated by bacteriophages that can regulate bacterial community structure, metabolic outputs, and mucosal immune homeostasis [30]. Here, we conducted a large-scale virome-focused analysis by integrating fecal metagenomic data from 338 NSCLC patients treated with PD-1 blockade, together with an independent external validation cohort. Using a multi-step framework that included differential abundance testing, phage–host prediction, cross-kingdom co-occurrence network analysis, functional annotation, and random forest modeling, we systematically characterized virome alterations associated with treatment response. Notably, virome features showed stronger discriminatory power for predicting clinical response than bacterial features, and they exhibited distinct compositional, ecological, and functional patterns linked to clinical outcomes. These findings establish the gut virome as a pivotal and previously underappreciated determinant of immunotherapy efficacy in NSCLC.
Virome signatures and putative mechanisms linking to clinical response
We observed a stepwise decline in the viral Shannon index with worsening therapeutic outcomes, mirroring the reduced bacterial diversity reported in NR [31]. This concordant pattern indicates a coordinated dysbiosis of the intestinal ecosystem that may accompany resistance to PD-1 blockade. Moreover, NR-enriched vOTUs were predominantly assigned to Peduoviridae and Inoviridae. Notably, members of Inoviridae have been reported to carry virulence-associated genes and can enhance bacterial pathogenicity by converting otherwise non-virulent hosts into strains with increased virulence [32].
Host prediction analysis further revealed that these NR-enriched vOTUs frequently targeted bacterial genera including Clostridium_M, Bacteroides, and Escherichia. The Clostridium_M has been reported to be enriched in patients with non-gastrointestinal cancers, consistent with clinical observations [33]. In addition, Bacteroides has been consistently associated with poor prognosis during ICI therapy across multiple cancer types, including NSCLC [34], melanoma [35], and gastric cancer [36]. The enrichment of these taxa may not merely reflect a dysbiosis state but could indicate an active, virus-mediated modulation of their functional activity.
Supporting this notion, functional annotation of the differentially enriched vOTUs provides crucial molecular insights. KOs significantly overrepresented in the NR group includeK01448 (amiABC; N−acetylmuramoyl−L−alanine amidase) and K01689 (ENO1_2_3; enolase). K01448 is involved in peptidoglycan hydrolysis—a key step in viral progeny release—and also regulates bacterial cell division and wall metabolism [37]. K01689 is a central glycolytic enzyme whose human homologues (ENO1 and ENO3) are upregulated in colorectal and pancreatic cancers, with high expression correlating positively with poor patient prognosis and advanced disease [38, 39]. The enrichment of these viral-encoded genes points to a potential two-pronged mechanism fostering a resistance phenotype in NR patients: 1) direct disruption of bacterial community integrity via enzymes like K01448 that interfere with cell wall dynamics, and 2) viral reprogramming of core host bacterial metabolism (e.g., glycolysis via K01689), which may subsequently alter the gut metabolite landscape to favor an immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment.
In stark contrast, phages enriched in the R group predominantly targeted bacterial genera with established beneficial roles in host immunity, including Ruminococcus_D, Faecalibacterium, and Roseburia. Consistent with our observations, Ruminococcus was significantly enriched in patients with stage III/IV NSCLC who responded to ICI treatment [40], and the Ruminococcaceae has also been associated with response to anti-PD-1 treatment in melanoma [41], and higher baseline Faecalibacterium abundance predicts better outcomes in multiple cancers [40, 41]. Roseburia, a key butyrate producer, has been shown to enhance anti-PD-1 efficacy in preclinical models by promoting butyrate-mediated activation of CD8+ T cells [42, 43]. This is particularly relevant as NSCLC responders exhibit higher PD-1 expression on peripheral CD8+ T cells, indicative of a more activated state [44].
Our co-occurrence network analysis further substantiated these findings, revealing distinct ecological architectures. Beyond differences in abundance, vOTUs linked to Ruminococcaceae (encompassing Faecalibacterium and Ruminococcus) and Lachnospiraceae (encompassing Roseburia) formed interaction modules that were unique to the R network and absent or less prominent in the NR network. This finding suggests that, in responders, these beneficial bacteria are embedded within a specialized phage–bacteria ecological framework, rather than merely being present at higher abundance.
Integrating this evidence, we propose that R-enriched phages infecting genera like Roseburia may modulate the abundance and/or metabolic output of their hosts, thereby influencing the production of immunoregulatory metabolites such as butyrate. This phage-mediated tuning could enhance CD8+ T-cell activation and potentially affect PD-1 expression dynamics, collectively contributing to a more effective anti-tumor immune response. Consequently, butyrate-related readouts and specific Roseburia-phage interaction patterns emerge as promising candidate biomarkers for predicting clinical outcomes under anti–PD-1 outcomes.
Clinical translation: predictive modeling and ecological insights
Accurate patient stratification prior to immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy remains an unmet clinical need. Our machine learning analysis directly addresses this challenge by demonstrating the superior predictive value of the gut virome. A random forest classifier based solely on viral features achieved the highest prediction performance (AUC = 76.8%), significantly outperforming a model using only bacterial data (AUC = 66.4%). Crucially, this advantage was robustly confirmed in an independent external validation cohort, where the virus-only model maintained the highest AUC. Notably, integrating bacterial features did not enhance model performance and even led to a slight decrease compared to the virus-only model. This suggests that bacterial signatures may contain more unrelated variants, thereby weakening the stronger and more specific signal provided by viral markers. These findings highlight the potential of virome based classifiers as clinically valuable tools for pre-treatment stratification and highlight the need to incorporate virome analysis into precision immuno-oncology research.
Previous studies have established the relative abundance of Akk as a reliable biomarker for favorable prognosis in NSCLC patients receiving PD-1 blockade [14], However, its relationship with the gut virome in this context was undefined. Our analysis revealed that Akk-negative individuals harbored a gut virome with significantly lower alpha diversity compared to Akk-positive subjects. Furthermore, the virome composition in Akk-negative patients was dominated by viral families such as Peduoviridae and Inoviridae, a pattern that mirrors the signatures enriched in non-responders. These findings suggest that Akk may not act in isolation but instead that its colonization may depend on, or contribute to, a healthier and more diverse gut virome ecosystem.
Limitations and future perspectives
Our study has several limitations should be acknowledged. First, although the primary cohort is sizable for metagenomic analysis, the validation cohort is relatively small; future multi-center prospective studies with larger sample sizes are needed to confirm the generalizability of our findings. Second, both viral host prediction and functional annotation depend on existing reference databases, which remain incomplete and may not fully capture novel or uncharacterized phage taxa. Third, the observational nature of our study precludes causal inference. Future mechanistic investigations using gnotobiotic animal models or targeted phage manipulation will be essential to establish whether the identified viral signatures actively modulate antitumor immunity. Finally, profiling fecal samples may not fully capture the mucosa-associated microbial communities or localized immune interactions within the tumor microenvironment.
Despite these limitations, our findings collectively highlight the gut virome as a critical and previously underappreciated determinant of immunotherapy response in NSCLC. By integrating assessments of viral diversity, taxonomic, ecological networks, and functional potential, we show that phage communities can distinguish between immune-favorable and immune-dysregulated gut ecosystems with a resolution superior to bacterial markers alone. These insights advocate for the incorporating virome profiling into the framework of microbiome-guided precision immunotherapy and suggest that targeted modulation of phage–bacteria interactions could represent a novel strategy to enhance antitumor efficacy. Future research aimed at dissecting the mechanistic basis of phage–host–immune crosstalk will be crucial for translating virome signatures into clinically actionable interventions.
Conclusion
In conclusion, this large-scale, integrative analysis establishes the gut virome as a critical determinant of clinical response to anti-PD-1 therapy in patients with advanced NSCLC. Clinical outcomes were associated with coordinated remodeling of the gut viral community, including changes in diversity, taxonomic composition, ecological interaction networks, and functional potential. Notably, the virus-only classifier consistently outperformed the bacteria-based model in both the discovery and validation cohorts, highlighting the distinct and robust predictive signal carried by the viral component of the microbiome. We further delineated a poor-response virome signature characterized by Peduoviridae and Inoviridae phages that preferentially target potential pathobionts and are enriched in auxiliary metabolic genes, in contrast to a favorable-response signature marked by Herelleviridae phages targeting beneficial butyrate-producing genera and forming more stable ecological networks. Together, these findings support a model in which the gut virome contributes to shaping host responses to ICIs, potentially through phage-mediated modulation of bacterial communities and their immunoregulatory outputs. Our results underscore the value of incorporating virome profiling into future microbiome-informed strategies for precision immunotherapy and suggest that targeting specific phage–bacteria interactions may represent a promising therapeutic avenue.
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Acknowledgements
Not applicable.
Abbreviations
- ICI
Immune checkpoint inhibitor
- NSCLC
Non-small cell lung cancer
- vOTU
Viral operational taxonomic unit
- Akk
Akkermansia muciniphila
- PD-1/PD-L1
programmed cell death protein 1/programmed cell death ligand 1
- CR/PR
Vartial response
- SD
Stable disease
- PD
Progressive disease
- SRA
Sequence Read Archive
- NCBI
National Center for Biotechnology Information
- cnGVC
Chinese Gut Virome Catalog
- KEGG
Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes
- KO
KEGG Orthology
- PERMANOVA
Permutational multivariate analysis of variance
- PCoA
Principal coordinate analysis
- MaAsLin2
Microbiome multivariate association with linear models
- AUC
Area under the receiver operating characteristic curve
Author contributions
ZL1(Zhixin Lei), MF, and YL contributed to the conception, planning, and managing of the study. ZL2(Zhou Liu), ML1(Meihong Liu), HC carried out the bioinformatic analyses. SL, NZ, GX, YZ, JX, and ML2(Min Li) participated in the interpretation of data and results. CX, TL, and QY participated in the development of analytical methods. ZL1 and ZL2 drafted the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final version of the manuscript.
Funding
This work was supported by the Natural Science Foundation of Liaoning Province (No.2025JH2/101800230), DMU-1&DICP (UN202209), National Natural Science Foundation of China (32202857), 2024 Hubei Key research and development project (2024BBB073), Open Research Project of Sichuan Provincial Clinical Research Center for Imaging Medicine in 2025 (YXYX2506), The Open Project of Key Laboratory of Prevention and treatment of cardiovascular and cerebrovascular diseases, Ministry of Education (XN202402).
Data availability
All data generated are available in the article and supplementary data files, as well as from the corresponding authors upon request.
Declarations
Ethical approval and consent to participate
Not applicable. This study involves secondary analysis of publicly available data hence no ethical approval was required.
Consent for publication
All authors have agreed to this manuscript.
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Footnotes
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Contributor Information
Zhixin Lei, Email: leizhixin@whut.edu.cn.
Min Feng, Email: fengfeng0716@163.com.
Yanxia Li, Email: liyanxia001@163.com.
References
- 1.Siegel RL, Giaquinto AN, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2024. CA Cancer J Clin. 2024;74(1):12–49. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Sorin M, et al. Neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy for NSCLC: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Oncol. 2024;10(5):621–33. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Kumar M, Sarkar AJEO. Current therapeutic strategies and challenges in NSCLC treatment: a comprehensive review. Exp Oncol. 2022;44(1):7–16. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Barr Kumarakulasinghe N, Zanwijk NV, Soo RAJR. Molecular targeted therapy in the treatment of advanced stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Respirology. 2015;20(3):370–78. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Marrone KA, Naidoo J, Brahmer JR. Immunotherapy for lung cancer: no longer an abstract concept. Semin Respir Crit Care Med. 2016;37(5):771–82. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Hirsch FR, et al. New and emerging targeted treatments in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. Lancet. 2016;388(10048):1012–24. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Zago G, et al. New targeted treatments for non-small-cell lung cancer-role of nivolumab. Biologics. 2016;103–17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 8.Peters S, Kerr KM, Stahel RJCTR. PD-1 blockade in advanced NSCLC: a focus on pembrolizumab. Cancer Treat Rev. 2018;62:39–49. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Niu M, et al. Predictive biomarkers of anti-PD-1/PD-L1 therapy in NSCLC. Exp Hematol Oncol. 2021;10(1):18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Liu Y, et al. The landscape of immune checkpoints expression in non-small cell lung cancer: a narrative review. Transl Lung Cancer Res. 2021;10(2):1029. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Ferrara R, et al. Hyperprogressive disease in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer treated with PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors or with single-agent chemotherapy. JAMA Oncol. 2018;4(11):1543–52. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Sivan A, et al. Commensal Bifidobacterium promotes antitumor immunity and facilitates anti-PD-L1 efficacy. Science. 2015;350(6264):1084–89. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Gopalakrishnan V, et al. Gut microbiome modulates response to anti-PD-1 immunotherapy in melanoma patients. Science. 2018;359(6371):97–103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Derosa L, et al. Intestinal Akkermansia muciniphila predicts clinical response to PD-1 blockade in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. Nat Med. 2022;28(2):315–24. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Clinton NA, et al. Crosstalk between the Intestinal virome and other components of the microbiota, and its effect on Intestinal mucosal response and diseases. J Immunol Res. 2022;1:7883945. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Broecker F, Moelling K. The roles of the virome in cancer. Microorganisms. 2021;9(12):2538. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Iwan E, et al. Gut resistome of NSCLC patients treated with immunotherapy. Front Genet. 2024;15:1378900. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Eisenhauer EA, et al. New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1). Eur J Cancer. 2009;45(2):228–47. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Chen S, et al. Fastp: an ultra-fast all-in-one FASTQ preprocessor. Bioinformatics. 2018;34(17):i884–90. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 20.Langmead B, Salzberg SL. Fast gapped-read alignment with bowtie 2. Nat Methods. 2012;9(4):357–59. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Yan Q, et al. The Chinese gut virus catalogue reveals gut virome diversity and disease-related viral signatures. Genome Med. 17, 30 (2025). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 22.Buchfink B, Xie C, Huson DH. Fast and sensitive protein alignment using DIAMOND. Nat Methods. 2015;12(1):59–60. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Kanehisa M, et al. KEGG: new perspectives on genomes, pathways, diseases and drugs. Nucleic Acids Res. 2017;45(D1):D353–61. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 24.Blanco-Míguez A, et al. Extending and improving metagenomic taxonomic profiling with uncharacterized species using MetaPhlAn 4. Nat Biotechnol. 2023;41(11):1633–44. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Dixon P. VEGAN, a package of R functions for community ecology. J Veg Sci. 2003;14(6):927–30. [Google Scholar]
- 26.Mallick H, et al. Multivariable association discovery in population-scale meta-omics studies. PLoS Comput Biol. 2021;17(11):e1009442. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 27.Hakozaki T, et al. The gut microbiome associates with immune checkpoint inhibition outcomes in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer. Cancer Immunol Res. 2020;8(10):1243–50. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Katayama Y, et al. The role of the gut microbiome on the efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors in Japanese responder patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer. Transl Lung Cancer Res. 2019;8(6):847–53. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Grenda A, et al. Presence of akkermansiaceae in gut microbiome and immunotherapy effectiveness in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer. AMB Express. 2022;12(1):86. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Chica Cardenas LA, et al. Gut virome dynamics: from commensal to critical player in health and disease. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2025;1–19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 31.Yang Y, et al. Gut microbiota and SCFAs improve the treatment efficacy of chemotherapy and immunotherapy in NSCLC. NPJ Biofilms Microbiomes. 2025;11(1):146. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Boyd EF, Brüssow H. Common themes among bacteriophage-encoded virulence factors and diversity among the bacteriophages involved. Trends Microbiol. 2002;10(11):521–29. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Byrd AL, et al. Gut microbiome stability and dynamics in healthy donors and patients with non-gastrointestinal cancers. J Exp Med. 2021;218(1). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 34.Xu H, et al. Efficacy of intestinal microorganisms on immunotherapy of non-small cell lung cancer. Heliyon. 2024;10(9). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 35.Chaput N, et al. Baseline gut microbiota predicts clinical response and colitis in metastatic melanoma patients treated with ipilimumab. Ann Oncol. 2017;28(6):1368–79. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Peng Z, et al. The gut microbiome is associated with clinical response to anti-PD-1/PD-L1 immunotherapy in gastrointestinal cancer. Cancer Immunol Res. 2020;8(10):1251–61. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Mesnage S, Foster SJ. Chapter 261 - N-Acetylmuramoyl-l-alanine amidase. In: Handbook of proteolytic enzymes. Academic Press, Academic Press; 2025. p. 1671–77.
- 38.Chen J, et al. ENO3 promotes colorectal cancer progression by enhancing cell glycolysis. Med Oncol. 2022;39(5):80. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Huang CK, et al. ENO1 promotes immunosuppression and tumor growth in pancreatic cancer. Clin Transl Oncol. 2023;25(7):2250–64. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Newsome RC, et al. Interaction of bacterial genera associated with therapeutic response to immune checkpoint PD-1 blockade in a United States cohort. Genome Med. 2022;14(1):35. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Spencer CN, et al. Dietary fiber and probiotics influence the gut microbiome and melanoma immunotherapy response. Science. 2021;374(6575):1632–40. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Hillman ET, et al. Comparative genomics of the genus Roseburia reveals divergent biosynthetic pathways that may influence colonic competition among species. Microb. Genomics. 2020;6(7):e000399. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 43.Kang X, et al. Roseburia intestinalis generated butyrate boosts anti-PD-1 efficacy in colorectal cancer by activating cytotoxic CD8+ T cells. Gut. 2023;72(11):2112–22. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Zhu X, et al. Microbial metabolite butyrate promotes anti-PD-1 antitumor efficacy by modulating T cell receptor signaling of cytotoxic CD8 T cell. Gut Microbes. 2023;15(2):2249143. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
All data generated are available in the article and supplementary data files, as well as from the corresponding authors upon request.







