Abstract
Patent foramen ovale (PFO) is a congenital heart condition with a prevalence of 20%–35% in the general population. It is associated with various paroxysmal neurological seizures. We report four patients who presented to our hospital with transient loss of consciousness (TLOC). They were diagnosed with PFO after a comprehensive examination. In this article, we discuss the mechanism related to PFO and TLOC, which provides a new clinical perspective for the diagnosis of TLOC.
Keywords: paradoxical embolism, PFO, syncope, TLOC, transcranial Doppler ultrasound bubble test
Introduction
Transient loss of consciousness (TLOC) can be categorized into two types: syncope and non-syncope (Puppala et al., 2014). Syncope is defined as TLOC resulting from transient global cerebral hypoperfusion, which is characterized by a sudden onset, short duration, and spontaneous complete recovery (Costantino et al., 2016). Syncope can be caused by many conditions including cardiogenic syncope, orthostatic hypotension, neurally mediated syncope, and cerebral syncope (Bassetti, 2014). Cardiogenic syncope is typically caused by arrhythmia or organic cardiovascular diseases (Chen-Scarabelli and Scarabelli, 2004). Neurally mediated syncope includes carotid sinus hypersensitivity and vasovagal syncope. This syncope is often triggered by predisposing factors such as coughing, urination, and defecation (Gauer, 2011). Cerebral syncope can be caused by transient ischemic attack or subclavian steal syndrome. In addition, TLOC caused by epileptic seizure, concussions, hypoglycemia, and other causes is classified as non-syncope (Koene et al., 2017). What other causes should we consider when the medical history and clinical examination of the above causes of TLOC do not find obvious abnormalities? Here we provide a new clinical approach.
Patent foramen ovale (PFO) is a common anatomical variation, accounting for about 20%–35% of the population (Calvert et al., 2011). PFO plays an important role in the occurrence and development of various diseases, such as cryptogenic stroke (Lee et al., 2018), migraine (Trabattoni et al., 2022), decompression sickness (Bove, 1998), platypnea–orthodeoxia syndrome (Blanche et al., 2013), obstructive sleep apnea syndrome and so on (Hoole et al., 2017). In recent years, TLOC caused by PFO has gradually received extensive attention from clinicians (Wêglarz et al., 2024). Although TLOC is benign in most patients,
recurrent episodes of TLOC can affect quality of life and lead to associated injuries. It is important to identify the risk factors for TLOC and take effective preventive measures to reduce its episodes (Zou et al., 2024). Here, we introduce four cases of TLOC caused by PFO.
Case reports
Case 1
A 38-years-old woman, previously healthy, was admitted due to headache and TLOC for more than 10 years. Physical examination was unremarkable. Hematological examination, including complete blood count (CBC), liver and kidney function tests, electrolytes, blood profile, coagulation function test, homocysteine, troponin, and B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) were all in the normal range. Chest CT showed a small nodule in the lower lobe of the right lung (Figure 1A). Brain MRI and MRA showed no significant abnormalities (Figures 1B, C). Cervical vascular ultrasound, 24-h video EEG, and echocardiography also showed no abnormalities. A 24-h holter electrocardiogram showed sinus rhythm. Right heart catheterization confirmed a PFO with significant right-to-left shunting (grade 3, characterized by many microbubbles) (Figure 1D). The patient decided to undergo PFO closure due to long-term headaches, and the headache did not recur after surgery. After long-term follow-up, we discovered that the patient did not experience recurrence of TLOC. This suggests that PFO may be a contributing factor in TLOC.
FIGURE 1.
Main examination findings for case 1: (A) chest CT; (B) cranial MRA; (C) cranial MRI; (D) right heart catheterization imaging.
Case 2
A 44-years-old female underwent PFO closure 10 years ago due to a heart murmur. Recently, she presented to our hospital with sudden TLOC. Physical examination revealed no positive findings. Hematological examination showed hyperlipidemia, with total cholesterol of 5.96 mmol/L and LDL of 4.4 mmol/L. Routine hematological parameters, including CBC, liver and kidney function tests, electrolytes, coagulation function test, homocysteine, troponin and BNP were in the normal range. Chest CT showed postoperative changes in the atrial septum (Figure 2A). Brain MRI and MRA revealed no significant abnormalities (Figures 2B, C). Cervical vascular ultrasound and 24-h video EEG also showed no abnormalities. Cardiac ultrasound showed postoperative changes in the atrial septum. A 24-h holter electrocardiogram showed sinus rhythm. No obvious abnormalities were found in the above results. Considering the relevant clinical manifestations of the case 1, we wondered whether the patient still had right-to-left shunting. We decided to conduct the transcranial Doppler ultrasound bubble test again. The result revealed 2 microemboli signals at rest and 10 microemboli signals after Valsalva maneuver (Figure 2D), indicating recurrent right-to-left shunting following PFO closure. Considering the patient’s history of PFO closure, we initiated antiplatelet therapy with aspirin. After 1 year of follow-up, the patient has not experienced TLOC.
FIGURE 2.
Main examination findings for case 2: (A) chest CT; (B) cranial MRA; (C) cranial MRI; (D) transcranial Doppler ultrasound bubble test.
Based on the clinical symptoms of the two patients, we hypothesized: Could PFO contribute to the occurrence of TLOC? Subsequently, we collected another two cases of PFO complicated by TLOC (Table 1).
TABLE 1.
Clinicalcharacteristics and test results of patients Case 3 and Case 4.
| Case 3 | Case 4 | |
|---|---|---|
| Age | 66 | 50 |
| Gender | Male | Female |
| Past medical history | Hypertension and sudden deafness in his right ear. | Two similar episodes of syncope. |
| Triggering factors | Lifting heavy objects | Exercise |
| Physical examination | No positive physical signs | No positive physical signs |
| Blood test | D-dimer: 760 ng/ml, CBC, blood glucose, electrolytes, liver and kidney function tests, lipid profile, troponin, BNP, and homocysteine were all in the normal range. | CBC, blood glucose, electrolytes, liver and kidney function tests, lipid profile, troponin, BNP, and homocysteine were all in the normal range. |
| Chest CT | Normal | Normal |
| Cranial MR | Multiple cerebral softening lesions in the pons, right basal ganglia, and left corona radiata region | Normal |
| Cranial MRA | Cerebral atherosclerosis (AS) | Cerebral AS |
| Carotid CTA | AS and mild stenosis of part of blood vessels | – |
| Cervical vascular ultrasound | – | Localized thickening of the intima-media in both common carotid arteries. |
| 24-h video EEG | Normal | Normal |
| Cardiac ultrasound | Left ventricular septal hypertrophy and degenerative changes of the aortic valve | Normal |
| Coronary CTA | Mild atherosclerotic changes in the coronary arteries | – |
| 24-h holter electrocardiogram | Sinus rhythm | Sinus rhythm |
| Transcranial Doppler ultrasound bubble test | Microemboli passed both at rest and during Valsalva maneuver, with a total count greater than 25, and more during the Valsalva maneuver. | No microemboli detected at rest, but 23 microembolic signals were observed during the Valsalva maneuver. |
| Transesophageal echocardiography/right cardiac catheterization | Transesophageal echocardiography: PFO | Right cardiac catheterization: PFO, with a moderate amount of contrast microbubbles visible in the left atrium after provocative maneuver. |
| Treatment | Aspirin | Aspirin |
| Table | Figure 3 | Figure 4 |
“–” indicates that the relevant examination was not performed.
FIGURE 3.
Main examination findings for case 3: (A) chest CT; (B) coronary CTA; (C) cranial MRI; (D) cranial MRA; (E) carotid CTA; (F) transcranial Doppler ultrasound bubble test.
FIGURE 4.
Main examination findings for case 4: (A) chest CT; (B) cranial MRA; (C) cranial MRI; (D) transcranial Doppler ultrasound bubble test.
Discussion
The foramen ovale is a normal fetal structure that allows oxygenated blood returning to the right atrium to reach the brain and vital organs directly (Abdelghani et al., 2019; Mojadidi et al., 2015). It is formed by the incomplete fusion of the primary and secondary septa (Abdelghani et al., 2019). After birth, the drop in pulmonary pressure causes left atrial pressure to exceed right atrial pressure, pushing the septum primum against the septum secundum and leading to functional closure of the foramen ovale (Kjeld et al., 2018; Wessler and Kent, 2015). This closure is usually completed before the age of two (Barrios et al., 2017). However, PFO still occurs in 20%–35% of the population (Beelke et al., 2003). PFO is associated with the development of various diseases. In this article, we mainly discuss TLOC caused by PFO.
There are two mechanisms of TLOC caused by PFO: first, abnormal embolism mechanism. Paradoxical embolism refers to the process where emboli from the venous system enter the arterial system through an abnormal cardiac pathway (Kottoor and Arora, 2018). Under normal physiological conditions, left atrial pressure exceeds the right, resulting in a pressure gradient that prevents or minimizes shunting through a PFO (Guo et al., 2007).
During some Valsalva maneuvers, such as coughing, sneezing, squatting, or weightlifting, the pressure of right atrial will increase, resulting in right-to-left shunting (Beelke et al., 2003). At the same time, the region of foramen ovale is prone to persistent impact from the inferior vena cava, and long-term blood flow impingement may lead to local tissue microulcers (Zhu et al., 2024). In addition, the hemodynamic changes caused by PFO may promote activation of coagulation factors and adhesion of blood cells (Elgendy et al., 2020). Under conditions that satisfy Virchow’s triad, the formation of in situ microthrombus is likely to occur. Thrombi or vasoactive substances from the venous system can enter the intracranial arterial system through right-to-left shunting, causing arterial spasms and transient cerebral ischemia, further inducing syncope (Kizer and Devereux, 2005; Ravi et al., 2024). When the microemboli enter the cerebral cortex via the bloodstream, the cortex is suppressed, and the patient will also experience syncope (Kelley and Kelley, 2021).
The second mechanism is hypoxia. Deoxygenated venous blood from the right atrium directly enters the left atrium through a PFO and mixes with oxygenated arterial blood to cause hypoxia in the body (Dehnert et al., 2007). When patients are in a hypoxic environment for a long time, pulmonary blood vessel constriction leads to elevated pulmonary blood vessel pressure. The elevated right atrial pressure can lead to the opening of the foramen ovale (Moses et al., 2015). There is a vicious cycle between hypoxia and PFO.
Case 1 had no further TLOC episodes during the year following PFO closure. However, case 2 presented with TLOC after recanalization of the previously closed foramen ovale. These two cases illustrate the potential causal relationship between PFO and TLOC from complementary perspectives. This also prompted our subsequent attention to the relationship between PFO and TLOC. In case 3 and 4, the patients experienced TLOC during physical exertion (e.g., heavy lifting or exercise). The increased right atrial pressure from these activities likely caused transient right-to-left shunting through a PFO, enabling microemboli to enter the arterial system and reach the cerebral vasculature. Additionally, case 4 experienced TLOC during exercise. In addition to the above mentioned possible induction of Valsava maneuver, there may also be a possible mechanism related to hypoxia. In case 4, TLOC occurred during physical exertion. This may involve not only the Valsalva-related mechanism described above but also a hypoxic component. Hayashida et al. (2001) found that embolism caused by PFO mainly occurred in cerebral cortex and vertebrobasilar artery regions through radionuclide venography. Previous deafness in case 3 could also be attributed to embolism in the vertebrobasilar artery. This is mainly because the anterior inferior cerebellar artery, which originates from the vertebrobasilar artery, is the main blood vessel supplying the inner ear (Baldi et al., 2012). The diameter of the PFO is an independent risk factor for ischemic stroke (Beelke et al., 2003). PFO diameters ranging from 1 to 19 mm (mean 4.9 mm) allow emboli to pass through the venous system. These emboli are often large enough to occlude the middle cerebral artery or its cortical branches upon reaching the cerebral circulation (Abdelghani et al., 2019; Yan et al., 2023). The multiple cerebral softening lesions observed in Case 3 are also associated with these microemboli.
Currently, international guidelines suggest that closure of PFO is superior to medical therapy alone for PFO-related stroke (Lee et al., 2018; Mas et al., 2017; Søndergaard et al., 2017; Saver et al., 2017). For patients with TLOC and PFO, both PFO closure and medical therapy are effective, but there is no relevant expert consensus. Further research is needed to determine whether PFO closure is superior to medical therapy in these patients.
This case report aims to provide a new diagnostic approach for TLOC in clinical practice. However, due to the small sample size of this study, its findings have certain limitations in terms of generalizability. Furthermore, due to the lack of direct monitoring data during the episodes and advanced imaging evidence, the exact pathophysiological mechanism of this condition requires further investigation and confirmation.
Conclusion
At present, TLOC caused by PFO has not been concerned by the majority of neurologists. Here we provide a new clinical idea for clinicians. Meanwhile, large sample clinical studies are still needed to determine whether PFO closure is superior to medical therapy in patients with unexplained TLOC and PFO.
Acknowledgments
We thanks for every author for efforts and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant no. 82001251) for help.
Funding Statement
The author(s) declared that financial support was received for this work and/or its publication. This research was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant no. 82001251).
Footnotes
Edited by: Gian Paolo Anzola, Casa di Cura Villa Gemma, Italy
Reviewed by: Li-Na Gao, Jining Medical University, China
Haiying Li, First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, China
Data availability statement
The original contributions presented in this study are included in this article/supplementary material, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding authors.
Ethics statement
The studies involving humans were approved by the Ethics Committee of the Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University. The studies were conducted in accordance with the local legislation and institutional requirements. The participants provided their written informed consent to participate in this study. Written informed consent was obtained from the individual(s) for the publication of any potentially identifiable images or data included in this article. Written informed consent was obtained from the participant/patient(s) for the publication of this case report.
Author contributions
YL: Writing – original draft, Conceptualization. CG: Writing – original draft, Conceptualization. WJ: Conceptualization, Writing – original draft. XT: Conceptualization, Writing – original draft. CL: Conceptualization, Writing – review & editing. XC: Conceptualization, Writing – review & editing. XR: Writing – review & editing, Conceptualization. JS: Conceptualization, Writing – review & editing. SY: Writing – review & editing, Funding acquisition.
Conflict of interest
The author(s) declared that this work was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Generative AI statement
The author(s) declared that generative AI was not used in the creation of this manuscript.
Any alternative text (alt text) provided alongside figures in this article has been generated by Frontiers with the support of artificial intelligence and reasonable efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, including review by the authors wherever possible. If you identify any issues, please contact us.
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
References
- Abdelghani M., El-Shedoudy S. A. O., Nassif M., Bouma B. J., de Winter R. J. (2019). Management of patients with patent foramen ovale and cryptogenic stroke: An update. Cardiology 143 62–72. 10.1159/000501028 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Baldi A., Tenaglia S., D’Anna S. (2012). Auditory dysfunction. Front. Neurol. Neurosci. 30 26–29. 10.1159/000333380 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Barrios D. D., Roncancio J., Avila A. A., Alvarado J. A., Montenegro A. C. (2017). Paradoxical embolism due to persistent foramen ovale; A case report. Emerg 5:e46. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bassetti C. L. (2014). Transient loss of consciousness and syncope. Handb. Clin. Neurol. 119 169–191. 10.1016/B978-0-7020-4086-3.00013-8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Beelke M., Angeli S., Del Sette M., Gandolfo C., Cabano M. E., Canovaro P., et al. (2003). Prevalence of patent foramen ovale in subjects with obstructive sleep apnea: A transcranial Doppler ultrasound study. Sleep Med. 4 219–223. 10.1016/s1389-9457(02)00256-3 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Blanche C., Noble S., Roffi M., Testuz A., Müller H., Meyer P., et al. (2013). Platypnea-orthodeoxia syndrome in the elderly treated by percutaneous patent foramen ovale closure: A case series and literature review. Eur. J. Intern. Med. 24 813–817. 10.1016/j.ejim.2013.08.698 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bove A. A. (1998). Risk of decompression sickness with patent foramen ovale. Undersea Hyperb. Med. 25 175–178. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Calvert P. A., Rana B. S., Kydd A. C., Shapiro L. M. (2011). Patent foramen ovale: Anatomy, outcomes, and closure. Nat. Rev. Cardiol. 8 148–160. 10.1038/nrcardio.2010.224 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Chen-Scarabelli C., Scarabelli T. M. (2004). Neurocardiogenic syncope. BMJ 329 336–341. 10.1136/bmj.329.7461.336 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Costantino G., Sun B. C., Barbic F., Bossi I., Casazza G., Dipaola F., et al. (2016). Syncope clinical management in the emergency department: A consensus from the first international workshop on syncope risk stratification in the emergency department. Eur. Heart J. 37 1493–1498. 10.1093/eurheartj/ehv378 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Dehnert C., Bärtsch P., Grünig E., Mereles D. (2007). High-altitude pulmonary edema and patent foramen ovale. JAMA 297 1432–1433. 10.1001/jama.297.13.1432-b [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Elgendy A. Y., Saver J. L., Amin Z., Boudoulas K. D., Carroll J. D., Elgendy I. Y., et al. (2020). Proposal for updated nomenclature and classification of potential causative mechanism in patent foramen ovale-associated stroke. JAMA Neurol. 77 878–886. 10.1001/jamaneurol.2020.0458 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gauer R. L. (2011). Evaluation of syncope. Am. Fam. Physician 84 640–650. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Guo S., Roberts I., Missri J. (2007). Paradoxical embolism, deep vein thrombosis, pulmonary embolism in a patient with patent foramen ovale: A case report. J. Med. Case Rep. 1:104. 10.1186/1752-1947-1-104 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hayashida K., Fukuchi K., Inubushi M., Fukushima K., Imakita S., Kimura K. (2001). Embolic distribution through patent foramen ovale demonstrated by (99m)Tc-MAA brain SPECT after Valsalva radionuclide venography. J. Nucl. Med. 42 859–863. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hoole S. P., Hernández-Sánchez J., Davies W. R., McNab D. C., Calvert P. A., Rana B. S., et al. (2017). Effects of patent foramen ovale closure on obstructive sleep Apnea syndrome: Pcosa Study. Can. J. Cardiol. 33 1708–1715. 10.1016/j.cjca.2017.09.005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kelley R. E., Kelley B. P. (2021). Heart-brain relationship in stroke. Biomedicines 9:1835. 10.3390/biomedicines9121835 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kizer J. R., Devereux R. B. (2005). Clinical practice. Patent foramen ovale in young adults with unexplained stroke. N. Engl. J. Med. 353 2361–2372. 10.1056/NEJMcp043981 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kjeld T., Jørgensen T. S., Fornitz G., Roland J., Arendrup H. C. (2018). Patent foramen ovale and atrial fibrillation as causes of cryptogenic stroke: Is treatment with surgery superior to device closure and anticoagulation? A review of the literature. Acta Radiol. Open 7:2058460118793922. 10.1177/2058460118793922 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Koene R. J., Adkisson W. O., Benditt D. G. (2017). Syncope and the risk of sudden cardiac death: Evaluation, management, and prevention. J. Arrhythm. 33 533–544. 10.1016/j.joa.2017.07.005 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kottoor S. J., Arora R. R. (2018). Cryptogenic stroke: To close a patent foramen ovale or not to close? J. Cent. Nerv. Syst. Dis. 10:1179573518819476. 10.1177/1179573518819476 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lee P. H., Song J. K., Kim J. S., Heo R., Lee S., Kim D. H., et al. (2018). Cryptogenic stroke and high-risk patent foramen ovale: The DEFENSE-PFO Trial. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 71 2335–2342. 10.1016/j.jacc.2018.02.046 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Mas J. L., Derumeaux G., Guillon B., Massardier E., Hosseini H., Mechtouff L., et al. (2017). Patent foramen ovale closure or anticoagulation vs. antiplatelets after stroke. N. Engl. J. Med. 377 1011–1021. 10.1056/NEJMoa1705915 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Mojadidi M. K., Christia P., Salamon J., Liebelt J., Zaman T., Gevorgyan R., et al. (2015). Patent foramen ovale: Unanswered questions. Eur. J. Intern. Med. 26 743–751. 10.1016/j.ejim.2015.09.017 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Moses K. L., Beshish A. G., Heinowski N., Baker K. R., Pegelow D. F., Eldridge M. W., et al. (2015). Effect of body position and oxygen tension on foramen ovale recruitment. Am. J. Physiol. Regul. Integr. Comp. Physiol. 308 R28–R33. 10.1152/ajpregu.00263.2014 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Puppala V. K., Dickinson O., Benditt D. G. (2014). Syncope: Classification and risk stratification. J. Cardiol. 63 171–177. 10.1016/j.jjcc.2013.03.019 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ravi D., Parikh R. V., Aboulhosn J. A., Tobis J. M. (2024). Patent foramen ovale and coronary artery spasm: A new patent foramen ovale-associated condition that may explain the mechanism of vasospastic angina. Cardiol. Clin. 42 559–571. 10.1016/j.ccl.2024.02.003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Saver J. L., Carroll J. D., Thaler D. E., Smalling R. W., MacDonald L. A., Marks D. S., et al. (2017). Long-term outcomes of patent foramen ovale closure or medical therapy after stroke. N. Engl. J. Med. 377 1022–1032. 10.1056/NEJMoa1610057 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Søndergaard L., Kasner S. E., Rhodes J. F., Andersen G., Iversen H. K., Nielsen-Kudsk J. E., et al. (2017). Patent foramen ovale closure or antiplatelet therapy for cryptogenic stroke. N. Engl. J. Med. 377 1033–1042. 10.1056/NEJMoa1707404 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Trabattoni D., Brambilla M., Canzano P., Becchetti A., Teruzzi G., Porro B., et al. (2022). Migraine in patients undergoing pfo closure: Characterization of a platelet-associated pathophysiological mechanism: The LEARNER study. JACC Basic Transl. Sci. 7 525–540. 10.1016/j.jacbts.2022.02.002 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wêglarz P., Wêgiel M., Kuszewski P., Konarska-Kuszewska E., Staszel M., Mizia-Stec K., et al. (2024). Characteristics of patients diagnosed for cardiac cause of ischemic neurological events and prescreened with a transcranial Doppler examination. Pol. Arch. Intern. Med. 134:16832. 10.20452/pamw.16832 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wessler B. S., Kent D. M. (2015). Prevention of recurrent stroke in patients with patent foramen ovale. Neurol. Clin. 33 491–500. 10.1016/j.ncl.2015.01.002 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Yan C., Li H., Wang C., Yu H., Guo T., Wan L., et al. (2023). Frequency and size of in situ thrombus within patent foramen ovale. Stroke 54 1205–1213. 10.1161/STROKEAHA.122.041524 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zhu J., Chen A., Zhu L., Li Y., Jiang Z., Ni D., et al. (2024). Right atrial septal in situ microthrombus: A potential novel cause of patent foramen ovale-associated stroke. J. Am. Heart Assoc. 13:e035838. 10.1161/JAHA.124.035838 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zou R., Wang S., Liu P., Chen D., Yan J., Cai H., et al. (2024). The association between patent foramen ovale and unexplained syncope in pediatric patients. Ital. J. Pediatr. 50:2. 10.1186/s13052-023-01572-y [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Data Availability Statement
The original contributions presented in this study are included in this article/supplementary material, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding authors.




