Skip to main content
Frontiers in Veterinary Science logoLink to Frontiers in Veterinary Science
. 2026 Mar 19;13:1783278. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2026.1783278

Evaluation of Escherichia coli drug resistance of relict gull (Larus relictus) in Hongjian Nur, Shaanxi, China

Anwen He 1,2,3,, Dingding Wu 1,2,3,, Na Zhao 1,2,3, Nan Wang 1,2,3, Ping Feng 1,3, Junjun Zhai 1,2,3,*, Yan Zhang 1,2,3,*
PMCID: PMC13043378  PMID: 41938762

Abstract

Antibiotic resistance (AMR) is one of today’s most pressing global public health crises, which effective containment of its potential negative effects requires regular monitoring of bacterial resistance. Wild birds are recognized as reservoirs and potential transmitters of antibiotic resistance, thus playing a critical role in the dissemination of resistant bacteria. Therefore, we evaluated the resistance phenotypes and resistance genes of E. coli in the intestinal tract of relict gulls in the Hongjian Nur area of Shaanxi Province. In this study, fecal samples from relict gulls were collected for E. coli isolation and identification, drug susceptibility testing, drug resistance gene detection, phylogenetic clustering, and multi-locus sequence typing. A total of 172 E. coli strains were isolated. The results of the drug susceptibility tests indicated phenotypic resistance rates of 37.21% for azithromycin, 12.21% for ampicillin, and 9.88% for tetracycline, with 19.95% of the strains exhibiting multiple drug resistance. PCR amplification results showed that the carrying rates of the first five resistance genes were all above 90%, with resistance rates for tem and strA both at 99.42%. The phylogenetic clustering of multi-drug resistant E. coli predominantly belonged to the B2 group. Sequence typing revealed that several E. coli alleles were primarily ST4162, ST1299, ST1196, ST297, and ST2570. Our findings indicate a serious level of drug resistance among E. coli from relict gulls, characterized by a high proportion of multiple drug resistance and a relatively high detection rate of various antibiotic resistance genes. By further investigating the distribution of drug-resistant bacteria in relict gulls, this study provides foundational data for understanding the resistance phenotypes and distribution of drug-resistant genes in migratory birds, thereby contributing to efforts aimed at alleviating the increasingly severe global antibiotic resistance issue.

Keywords: drug resistance gene, Escherichia coli, Hongjian Nur, relict gull, resistance phenotype

Background

Migratory animals are integral to ecosystem biodiversity, and their biological activities contribute to the functioning and stability of ecosystems. Among migratory species, birds have received substantial attention as potential vectors of pathogens because they can travel long distances within short time periods (1–4). Birds that are closely associated with urban habitats and other areas of human activity are more likely to carry drug-resistant Escherichia coli (E. coli), thereby providing transmission routes between urban and natural environments (5). Concurrently, scientists speculate that migratory birds may serve as reservoirs for drug-resistant bacteria and resistance genes, facilitating their spread to various regions across the globe (6). Consequently, assessing the epidemiological role of migratory birds as vectors of drug resistance is essential for evaluating ecosystem health, reflecting human activities and their impacts in a timely manner (7, 8).

Relict gulls (Larus relictus) are endangered migrant birds belonging to a European family of medium-sized waterfowl. They primarily inhabit desert saltwater lakes, and alkaline lakes at altitudes of 1,200–1,500 meters, thriving under desert and semi-desert ecological conditions. These birds migrate north in March and south in October each year (9). Recognized as an effective species in 1971, relict gulls were subsequently listed in Appendix I of the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora (CITES) and the Convention on Migrant Species (CMS). They are categorized as a threatened species in the “Red Book” published by the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN). As a rare and endangered species globally, relict gulls are also classified as a Class I protected bird in China (10).

Escherichia coli is found in the intestines of humans and various animal species, including birds, and is recognized as one of the most prevalent zoonotic pathogens (11). It is frequently utilized as an indicator bacterium for assessing antimicrobial selective pressure in laboratory settings. E. coli is frequently utilized as an indicator bacterium for assessing antimicrobial selective pressure in laboratory settings (12). Furthermore, E. coli not only acquires drug resistance genes from other bacteria but also disseminates these genes to other bacterial strains through various mechanisms, enabling horizontal gene transfer among different bacterial types (13). Among the reported pathogens affecting wild birds, E. coli is the most significant (4).

Currently, drug resistant microorganisms have emerged as one of the most significant health challenges in both public health and veterinary medicine (14). The rapid spread of multi-drug-resistant bacteria has increasingly propelled humanity into what is referred to as the “post-antibiotic era” (15). E. coli, being the most widely distributed bacterium, is frequently monitored as a key indicator of antibiotic resistance due to its inherent characteristics (16). During the surveillance of E. coli resistance, numerous resistance genes have been identified as being closely linked to both human and animal health (17). Additionally, E. coli isolates from wild birds across various regions of the world exhibit commonalities with other host-associated resistant pathogens (18–20). Notably, the majority of bacterial pathogens that produce extended-spectrum β-lactamases (Esbl) in wild birds are E. coli (21). Islam et al. (22) found that migratory birds in Bangladesh carry high levels of E. coli resistance. Nearly 40% of E. coli isolates produce extended-spectrum beta-lactamases, and all of these are multi resistant strains, with resistance to tetracycline, fluoroquinolones, and streptomycin being the most prevalent. This finding aligns with the research conclusions of Guenther et al. (23) regarding common wild birds in Europe. The abuse of antibiotics has accelerated the emergence of multi resistance; however, the mechanisms of antibiotic resistance and the distribution of resistance genes within wild bird populations remain inadequately understood (24). Investigating antibiotic resistance and gaining a comprehensive understanding of resistant bacteria and resistance gene distribution in wild birds are essential for designing effective prevention strategies against the threat of antibiotic resistance. Therefore, this study aimed to determine the E. coli resistance phenotypes and antibiotic resistance gene profiles. E. coli was isolated from relict gulls feces collected in Shenmu City, Shaanxi Province, and its resistance to 15 different antibiotics and the presence of 49 resistance genes were assessed. This research is significant for the conservation of species diversity, the assessment of clinical safety, the prediction and early warning of drug-resistant strain risks, and the safeguarding of public health.

Materials and methods

Sample collection and bacterial isolation

In this study, 67 fecal samples from relict gulls were randomly collected in the Hongjian Nur area of Shenmu City, stored at low temperatures, and subsequently sent to the laboratory. In the laboratory, the stool samples were placed in centrifuge tubes, to which an appropriate volume of 0.9% normal saline was added, and the mixture was thoroughly ground. E. coli was isolated from the feces using McConkey solid medium. Subsequently, a single colony was picked from the McConkey agar and Gram-stained according to established protocols, with the results observed under an oil immersion microscope. After confirmation via staining and microscopic examination, the single colonies were enriched in LB liquid medium for further research. All media were incubated at 37 °C for 18 to 24 h to facilitate bacterial growth.

Bacterial DNA extraction

For bacterial DNA extraction, 1 mL of pure LB culture colonies was selected according to the instructions provided in the bacterial genomic DNA extraction kit. The supernatant obtained during centrifugation was stored at −20 °C and utilized as template DNA.

Escherichia coli molecular bioassay

The E. coli housekeeper gene icd was amplified via PCR using the pure bacterial solution DNA from the isolated strain as a template, allowing for the determination of the E. coli genotype. The primer sequences were as follows: icd (F): ATGGAAAGTAAAGTAGTTGTTCCGGCACA; icd (R): GGACGCAGCAGGATCTGTT, with the 878 relict gulls band being considered positive. The PCR mixture was prepared with a total volume of 10 μL, comprising 5 μL of 2 × Taq PCR premix reagent II, 0.5 μL of each primer, 1 μL of template DNA, and 3 μL of ddH2O. The PCR amplification conditions included an initial denaturation step at 94 °C for 5 min, followed by 30 cycles of denaturation (30 s at 94 °C), annealing (30 s at 54 °C), and extension (30 s at 72 °C), concluding with a final extension at 72 °C for 10 min. After mixing the amplified PCR products with loading dyes, 10 μL of the mixture was transferred using a micropipette and loaded onto a 1.5% agarose gel. The mixture was then validated by gel electrophoresis at 120 V for 25 min and observed using an ultraviolet (UV) transilluminator. The E. coli strain ATCC 25922 was provided by Professor Zhu Zhanbo of Heilongjiang Bayi Agricultural University as a quality control strain, while mixtures without template DNA served as negative controls.

Antimicrobial susceptibility testing

Isolates were assessed for resistance to commonly used antibiotics using the Kirby-Bauer disk diffusion method, in accordance with the protocols outlined in the CLSI guidelines. The selection of antibiotics was primarily based on their prevalent use and significance to both public and animal health. Ultimately, the antibiotic groups (β-lactams, aminoglycosides, quinolones, lincomycin, macrolides, colistin, chloramphenicol, cephalosporins, sulfonamides, and tetracyclines) and specific antibiotics (imipenem, ampicillin, cefazolin, gentamicin, streptomycin, tetracycline, enrofloxacin, norfloxacin, lincomycin, azithromycin, chloramphenicol, florfenicol, cefquinome, fonomide, and polymyxin B) were selected.

The bacterial suspension for the drug susceptibility test was prepared in advance. In a sterile environment, 100 μL of the bacterial suspension was inoculated onto LB solid medium, which was evenly coated using a coater. Drug susceptibility tablets were then uniformly placed onto the medium using tweezers and appropriately labeled. The plates were inverted and incubated at 37 °C for 16–18 h. The results were interpreted by measuring the diameter of the inhibition zone according to CLSI guidelines and recorded as resistant (R), intermediate (I), or sensitive (S). Bacterial isolates that exhibited resistance to at least three antibiotics from different classes (≥3 antibiotic groups) were classified as multidrug-resistant (MDR) isolates.

Antibiotic resistance genes determination

Using specific primers, single PCR was employed to identify antibiotic resistance genes. This study focused on the resistance genes conferred to E. coli by antibiotics such as quinolones, tetracyclines, sulfonamides, and aminoglycosides. Based on the resistance genes, primers, and annealing temperatures (as outlined in Supplementary Table 1), the presence of E. coli resistance genes in relict gulls was assessed. The PCR was conducted in a reaction mixture with a total volume of 10 μL, with the composition mirroring the PCR fractions specified in the E. coli Molecular Bioassay. Amplification conditions were tailored according to the annealing temperature and the length of the target fragment. The amplified products were subjected to electrophoresis on a 1.5% agarose gel, and the results were observed and documented.

Phylogenetic clustering of Escherichia coli and MLST

According to the method reported by Tang et al. (25), the chuA, yiaA, and tspE4.C2 genes (Table 1) were detected simultaneously using single PCR. Based on the various combinations of chuA, yiaA, and tspE4.C2, E. coli can be categorized into four populations: Group A (chuA−, TspE4.C2−), Group B1 (chuA−, tspE4.C2+), Group B2 (chuA+, yiaA+), and Group D (chuA+, yiaA−). Screening multidrug resistant E.coli Strains from Drug Susceptibility Test for Multilocus Sequence Typing (MLST). Primers were synthesized based on seven housekeeping genes, including adk, fumC, gyrB, icd, mdh, purA, and recA, as listed in the E. coli MLST database1 (Table 1) (26, 27). These primers were employed to amplify the genes of multidrug-resistant strains, and the resulting products were sequenced. The sequencing results were analyzed using the ChromasPro software, and the outcomes were subsequently uploaded to the MLST database2 to identify the corresponding sequence number and ST type.

Table 1.

Escherichia coli clustering and housekeeping gene primers.

Gene Primer Nucleotide sequence (5′–3′) Amplicon size (bp) Tm (°C)
chuA chuA-F GACGAACCAACGGTCAGGAT 279 57
chuA-R TGCCGCCAGTACCAAAGACA
yiaA yiaA-F TGCCGCCAGTACCAAAGACA 211 57
yiaA-R ATGGAGAATGCGTTCCTCAAC
TspE4.C2 TspE4.C2-F GAGTAATGTCGGGGCATTCA 152 57
TspE4.C2-R CGCGCCAACAAAGTATTACG
adk adk-F ATTCTGCTTGGCGCTCCGGG 583 52
adk-R CCGTCAACTTTCGCGTATTT
fumC fumC-F TCACAGGTCGCCAGCGCTTC 806 52
fumC-R TACGCAGCGAAAAAGATTC
gyrB gyrB-F TCGGCGACACGGATGACGGC 911 58
gyrB-R ATCAGGCCTTCACGCGCATC
icd icd-F ATGGAAAGTAAAGTAGTTGTTCCGGC 878 54
icd-R GGACGCAGCAGGATCTGTT
mdh mdh-F AGCGCGTTCTGTTCAAATGC 932 60
mdh-R CAGGTTCAGAACTCTCTCTGT
purA purA-F CGCGCTGATGAAAGAGATGA 816 54
purA-R CATACGGTAAGCCACGCAGA
recA recA-F CGCATTCGCTTTACCCTGACC 780 58
recA-R TCGTCGAAATCTACGGACCGGA

Statistical analysis

The laboratory results were analyzed descriptively using SPSS. A chi-square test was employed to assess the relationship between the carriage of specific resistance genes and the expression of phenotypic resistance. Statistical significance was determined at a p-value of less than 0.05.

Results

Isolation and molecular bioassay of Escherichia coli

A total of 172 E. coli strains were isolated using morphological and molecular biological identification methods. The colonies appeared fresh peach red or reddish on the medium, with a dark peach red center. They were round, flat, and characterized by neat edges, a smooth surface, and a moist texture (Figure 1A). Gram staining revealed that the bacteria were rod-shaped and stained red, confirming their classification as Gram-negative bacteria (Figure 1B). PCR amplification was conducted using E. coli-specific primer icd, resulting in a pre-amplified fragment length of 878 bp (Figure 1C).

Figure 1.

Panel A displays a petri dish with pink agar and isolated round bacterial colonies. Panel B shows a microscopic view of numerous small, red-stained rod-shaped bacteria on a yellow background. Panel C presents an agarose gel electrophoresis image with multiple lanes, a DNA ladder, clear bands near 878 base pairs, and labeled lanes M, P, N, and 1–10 for sample identification.

Isolation and identification of E. coli: (A) Growth on McConkey medium; (B) observation of Gram staining under a microscope; (C) identification of E. coli (M: Marker; P: Positive control; N: Negative control; 1–10: Isolate strains).

Antimicrobial susceptibility testing

The drug susceptibility test results indicated (as illustrated in Figure 2 and Table 2) that among the 172 E. coli strains examined, 64 (37.21%) were resistant to azithromycin, 21 (12.21%) to ampicillin, 17 (9.88%) to tetracycline, 10 (5.81%) to streptomycin, 7 (4.07%) to cefazolin, 6 (3.49%) to imipenem, and 4 (2.33%) to enrofloxacin. Furthermore, 1.74% of the isolates exhibited phenotypic resistance to florfenicol, polymyxin B, chloramphenicol, cefquinoxime, fonomine, and norfloxacin. Notably, all but one isolate (171 strains, or 99.42%) were found to be resistant to lincosamines. Additionally, it was observed that 19.95% of E. coli strains displayed multiple drug resistance (as shown in Figure 2), with triple drug resistance accounting for 62.5% (15/24), quadruple drug resistance for 20.8% (5/24), quintuple drug resistance for 8.3% (2/24), six-drug resistance for 4.2% (1/24), and seven-drug resistance for 4.2% (1/24).

Figure 2.

Bar chart showing multidrug resistance profiles, with each colored bar representing a unique antibiotic resistance combination listed in the legend. Most profiles have a resistance count of one, except for one tan bar (S-MY-AZM-TET) with a resistance count of six.

Illustrates the results of the multidrug resistance of E. coli isolated from relict gulls. The vertical axis represents the number of E. coli strains, while the horizontal axis depicts the combinations of phenotypic resistance, including GM (Gentamicin), S (Streptomycin), AMP (Ampicillin), CEZ (Cefazolin), IPM (Imipenem), ENR (Enrofloxacin), NOR (Norfloxacin), MY (Lincomycin), SXT (Paediatric Compound Sulfamethoxazole Tablets), AZM (Azithromycin), TET (Tetracycline), PB (Polymyxin B), EFC (Florfenicol), C (Chloramphenicol), and CTX (Cefquinome).

Table 2.

Results of phenotypic drug susceptibility tests of E. coli isolated from relict gulls.

Antibiotic Antibiotic abbreviations n = 172
Resistance (%) Intermediary (%) Sensitivity (%)
Aminoglycoside GM 2 (1.16) 17 (9.88) 153 (88.95)
S 10 (5.81) 40 (23.26) 122 (70.93)
Beta-lactam AMP 21 (12.21) 38 (22.09) 113 (65.70)
CEZ 7 (4.07) 12 (6.98) 153 (88.95)
IPM 6 (3.49) 6 (3.49) 160 (93.02)
Fluoroquinolone ENR 4 (2.33) 15 (8.72) 153 (88.95)
NOR 3 (1.74) 2 (1.16) 167 (97.09)
Lincosamide MY 171 (99.42) 0 (0.00) 1 (0.58)
Sulfonamide SXT 3 (1.74) 2 (1.16) 167 (97.09)
Macrolide AZM 64 (37.21) 51 (29.65) 57 (33.14)
Tetracycline TET 17 (9.88) 89 (51.74) 66 (38.37)
Colistin PB 3 (1.74) 5 (2.91) 164 (95.35)
Phenicols EFC 3 (1.74) 14 (8.14) 155 (90.12)
C 3 (1.74) 8 (4.65) 161 (93.60)
Cephalosporin CTX 3 (1.74) 42 (24.42) 127 (73.84)

Antibiotic resistance genes determination

A total of 40 resistance genes were identified in 172 E. coli strains obtained from relict gulls. The detection rates of the tem and strA genes were assessed through PCR amplification, with both genes present in 171 strains (99.42%) (Figure 3). The positive rates for gyrA, tem, aac(3)-IID, and aac(6)-IB were slightly lower, found in 170 (98.84%), 160 (93.02%), 157 (91.28%), and 153 (88.95%) strains, respectively. Notably, more than 90% of the 172 E. coli strains carried the first five resistance genes. Both tem primer and tem-1 primer, which are classified as beta-lactam resistance genes, were detected in 160 E. coli strains (Supplementary Figures 1, 2). The sul1 gene was identified in 95 isolates (55.23%), although most sulfonamide-resistant genes were found to be combined genes. The sul3 gene was not detected in any of the 172 E. coli isolates from relict gulls, and only four isolates exhibited simultaneous detection of both sul1 and sul2. Tetracycline resistance gene determinants, tetA and tetB, were found in 14 (8.14%) and 23 (13.37%) E. coli isolates, respectively (Figures 3 and Supplementary Figure 3). Among the chloramphenicol resistance genes, only floR was detected, accounting for 14 strains (4.65%), while neither cmlA1 nor cat was identified. Furthermore, the 172 E. coli strains from relict gulls harbored a significant number of resistance genes, with each strain carrying at least five resistance genes; notably, 29 E. coli strains (16.86%) possessed 15 or more resistance genes.

Figure 3.

Bar chart illustrating the percentage of resistance genes detected, with tem, strA, gyrA, and sul1 genes reaching nearly one hundred percent, and other genes showing progressively lower resistance percentages down to mcr-1, sul3, and cat with percentages close to zero.

Gene detection results (horizontal axis: resistance genes; longitudinal axis: percentage in 172 E. coli strains).

Correlation between resistance gene and phenotype

From the correlation of phenotypic and genotypic resistance profiles, 23.52% (4/17) and 35.29% (6/17) of tetracycline-resistant strains carried tetA and tetD, respectively. The carrying of these genes were significantly associated with tetracycline phenotypic resistance (p < 0.05). All E. coli isolates with tetracycline phenotypic resistance had teA, tetD or both. Similarly, there was a significant correlation between ctx-M gene carrying and cefazolin (p < 0.05, X2 = 5.65). Two E. coli strains with phenotypic resistance to cefazolin did not have ctx-M gene, but had both tem. The rest were found in cefazolin resistant strains (12) and (153), and 48 strains had ctx-M gene (Table 3).

Table 3.

Relationship between phenotype and genotype of relict gull E. coli.

Drug group and resistance genes Number of isolates carrying the resistance gene X2 p-value
Resistanta Non-resistantb
Cefazolin ctx-M 5 (71.43%) 48 (29.09%) 5.65 0.047
Ampicillin cmy-2 0 (0.00%) 37 (24.50%) 6.556 0.023
Tetracycline tetA 4 (23.52%) 10 (6.45%) 5.976 0.048
Tetracycline tetD 6 (35.29%) 19 (12.26%) 6.544 0.028
a

Isolates that are phenotypically resistant to the indicated antibiotic and carry the resistance gene.

b

Isolates phenotypically susceptible or intermediately resistant to the indicated antibiotic but carry the resistance gene.

Phylogenetic clustering of Escherichia coli and MLST

A total of 172 E. coli strains were amplified for different bands of the chuA, yiaA, and TspE4.C2 genes (Supplementary Figure 4). The results indicated that there were 117 strains (68.02%) belonging to the E. coli group B2 and 41 strains (23.84%) in group B1. Additionally, 13 strains (7.56%) were identified in group D, while only one strain (0.58%) was classified in group A (Figure 4). Seven housekeeping gene fragments of the expected size were amplified from 24 E. coli strains exhibiting multiple resistances, alongside 5 strains demonstrating the highest number of resistance genes. Sequence comparison results revealed that 29 strains of multidrug-resistant E. coli (MDR E. coli) were categorized into 14 sequence types (STs), with 9 strains (31.03%) identified as ST4162, the most prevalent type. ST1299 was observed in 4 strains (13.79%) of E. coli, making it the second most common after ST4162. Furthermore, ST1196, ST297, ST2570, and ST2611 were each detected in 2 strains (6.09%) of E. coli, while 1 strain (6.09%) represented the remaining STs (Figure 5).

Figure 4.

Bar chart with four colored bars represents group percentages labeled B2, B1, D, and A. B2 has the highest value near sixty-eight percent, B1 is about twenty-eight percent, D is around ten percent, and A is just above zero percent.

Results of evolutionary clustering of E. coli system.

Figure 5.

Bar chart illustrating the distribution of sequence types as percentages, with sequence type four thousand one hundred sixty-two representing over thirty percent and other types, identified in the legend by numbers, contributing lower percentages.

Multidrug-resistant E. coli genotype results.

Discussion

Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is a major global threat to human and animal health and is projected to cause up to 10 million deaths annually by 2050 if not effectively controlled (20, 28). Wild birds serve as sentinels for the dissemination of antimicrobial resistance. Widespread use of antibiotics produces a large amount of wastewater and garbage, and relict gulls often inhabit aquatic environments affected by human activities, which may contribute to the spread of drug-resistant bacteria in different geographical areas (29). A study conducted in Russia revealed that wild birds exhibit high levels of resistance to critical antibiotics, such as extended-spectrum cephalosporins, fluoroquinolones, colistin, and carbapenems (30). Therefore, monitoring migratory birds is essential, as they represent a significant pathway for the spread of bacterial resistance, warranting attention for potential risks associated with this issue.

This study investigated the resistance phenotype and genotype of E. coli in the gut of gulls. A total of 172 isolates of E. coli were subjected to drug sensitivity tests, revealing that 95.35% of the isolates were resistant to polymyxin B, which aligns with findings from Kwaśna et al. (31). Phenotypic resistance was observed for while azithromycin (37.21%), ampicillin (12.21%), and tetracycline (9.88%) also exhibited some levels of resistance. Among the 172 strains of E. coli, multidrug resistance was found in 19.95% of the isolates. Zhao et al. (32) reported on E. coli sampled from Dalian Bathing Beach, where drug resistance testing indicated a high resistance rate to tetracycline (24.6%). The multidrug resistance rate for E. coli in that study was 58%, which differs from our findings, this discrepancy may be attributed to differences in sample sources and sizes. Furthermore, studies from various regions worldwide have documented high multidrug resistance rates ranging from 60 to 100% (33–35). The findings of Turkey (36) and Li et al. (37) are consistent with our results. These findings confirm that E. coli exhibits high resistance to lincosamide antibiotics while showing relatively lower resistance to ampicillin.

Tetracyclines play a crucial role in treating various infections in animals and are categorized as “highly important antimicrobial agents” for human infections (20). Studies on wild bird resistance conducted globally have reported high rates of tetracycline resistance, ranging from 40 to 80% (2, 38, 39). In contrast, the detection rate of tetracycline resistance gene was 9.88%, which differs significantly from recent studies on tetracycline resistance in E. coli (40). Given the significance of tetracycline in clinical treatment, the relatively low resistance rate observed in the current study may be attributed to the predominant breeding of sheep in the local area. Previous research indicated that E. coli derived from sheep demonstrates relatively high resistance to tetracycline, which could be linked to local animal treatment practices, thereby resulting in reduced transmission of tetracycline resistance genes in China.

The results of the tetracycline resistance gene detection indicated a close relationship between the presence of tetracycline resistance genes tetA and tetB and tetracycline resistance itself. The positive detection rate of tetB among tetracycline-resistant strains was found to be 13.37%, which slightly differs from the drug resistance levels reported by Wang et al. (41) This discrepancy may be attributed to variations in regional backgrounds and distinct drug-resistant flora. Additionally, a study conducted by Fashae et al. (42) found that 85 and 18% of tetracycline-resistant E. coli isolates possessed the tetA and tetB genes, respectively.

The resistance genes for eight different antibiotics were detected through PCR amplification. The results indicated a relatively high detection rate for aminoglycosides, with positive detection rates of strA (99.42%), aac(3)-IID (91.28%), and aac(6)-IB (88.92%), all exceeding 80%. This finding is consistent with the detection rates of aminoglycoside resistance genes in E. coli from sheep reported by Gu et al. (43). This suggests that E. coli possesses a significant ability to harbor drug resistance genes and can facilitate the spread of drug resistance genes among various animal populations. The inappropriate use of antibiotics may lead to the horizontal transfer of drug resistance genes, thereby posing a threat to public health. Notably, the positive detection rates for tem-1 primer in beta-lactams (99.42%) and tem primer (93.02%) also exceeded 90%. Furthermore, Yu et al. (15) noted a slight increase in the detection of tem β-lactamase resistance genes. In contrast, the positive rates for other classes, including glycopeptides, quinolones, macrolides, and chloramphenicol, were lower than those of the aforementioned four classes. By assessing the degree of resistance to various antibiotics, this study enhances the accuracy and effectiveness of antibiotic treatment, thereby reducing unnecessary antibiotic use and mitigating the risk of drug resistance.

Drug resistance genes can confer resistance to specific antibiotics in bacteria. The results presented in Table 3 indicate that certain drug resistance genes in E. coli are associated with antibiotic resistance. A significant association was observed between tetA/tetD and tetracycline resistance (p ≤ 0.05), whereas most other genes showed no statistical correlation, highlighting the complexity of genotype–phenotype relationships. Additionally, gene editing and other technological advancements may provide valuable insights into the molecular mechanisms underlying bacterial drug resistance and offer potential strategies for mitigating this issue in the future.

E. coli phylogenetic groups are categorized into A, B1, B2, and D based on their pathogenicity and drug resistance. Groups A and B1 primarily consist of symbiotic E. coli, whereas groups B2 and D contain a higher prevalence of pathogenic E. coli. In this study, most isolates belonged to phylogroup B2, and the detection rate of drug-resistant genes is notably high, suggesting the presence of potentially virulent E. coli lineages in relict gulls. These findings underscore the ecological relevance of migratory birds in the environmental maintenance of antimicrobial resistance. Among the 29 multidrug-resistant E. coli isolates, 14 distinct sequence types (STs) were identified, with ST4162 being the predominant lineage. The predominance of ST4162 among MDR isolates warrants further surveillance to clarify its ecological and epidemiological significance. Although ST4162 has been reported in human-associated contexts, its detection in relict gulls should be interpreted within a One Health framework rather than as evidence of direct transmission. In a study conducted by Martínez-Álvarez et al. (44) in Spain, the ST genotype carrying the blaCTX-M-1 resistance gene was isolated from the cloaca samples of white stork nestlings. This finding aligns with the results of the current experiment, although the relic gulls exhibited a greater variety of resistance genes. In contrast, poultry-derived E. coli in Henan exhibited distinct ST distributions and markedly higher resistance levels than those observed in relict gulls, likely reflecting stronger antimicrobial selection pressure in intensive production systems (45). ST1196 has been reported in both clinical and animal-associated settings and is known to carry extended-spectrum β-lactamase and carbapenemase genes, indicating potential clinical relevance (46–49). Additionally, ST297, belonging to the O25b: H4 ST131 clonal complex, represents a globally disseminated antibiotic-resistant lineage frequently associated with human infections (50). The identification of these STs in relict gulls highlights the ecological connectivity between wildlife and human-associated bacterial populations.

Antibiotic-resistant bacteria in wild birds are generally associated with indirect exposure to anthropogenic contamination, such as wastewater discharge and livestock runoff, rather than direct antimicrobial treatment (42). Variations in environmental management practices may therefore influence resistance prevalence across regions. This study has several limitations. First, although 67 fecal samples were collected (yielding 172 E. coli isolates), the sample size and sampling frame may not fully capture temporal variability in resistance patterns within the relict gull population. Second, sampling was restricted to a single geographical location (Hongjian Nur, Shenmu City, Shaanxi Province), which limits the generalizability of the results to other breeding or migratory stopover sites where antibiotic exposure pressures may differ. Third, methodological constraints may have influenced resistance estimates: disk diffusion testing provides phenotypic categorization but can vary by breakpoint interpretation and does not quantify MICs. Finally, fecal sampling and culture-based isolation may underrepresent non-culturable bacteria or strains present at low abundance. Future work multi-site, multi-season surveillance incorporating MIC testing and genome-based approaches would strengthen inference on sources and transmission pathways.

Conclusion

This study shows that wild relict gulls in the Hongjian Nur region carry antimicrobial-resistant E. coli, including multidrug-resistant isolates. The detection of multiple resistance determinants and diverse sequence types suggests that migratory birds may contribute to the maintenance and environmental dissemination of antimicrobial resistance at the wildlife–environment–human interface. These findings support incorporating migratory birds into One Health AMR surveillance, and further work is needed to clarify the sources and transmission pathways of resistance in this system.

Acknowledgments

We thank the staff of Hongjian Nur for their support during sample collection.

Funding Statement

The author(s) declared that financial support was received for this work and/or its publication. This work was supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China Regional Science Foundation (Project No.: 32060810), Title: Molecular Mechanism of PGAM5 Regulating the cGAS-STING Signaling Pathway against CPV Infection; National Natural Science Foundation of China Regional Science Foundation (Project No.: 31960710), Title: Screening and Identification of Main Pathogens Causing Diarrhea in Lambs in Northern Shaanxi Based on Metagenomics. Shaanxi Provincial Department of Science and Technology Fund Project (Project No.: 2025ZY-XCZXJX-12), Title: Integrated Demonstration of Efficient Production of White Cashmere Goat Mutton and Meat Quality Evaluation Technology in Northern Shaanxi and integrated demonstration of meat quality evaluation technology.

Edited by: Valentina Virginia Ebani, University of Pisa, Italy

Reviewed by: Sultan Ali, University of Agriculture, Faisalabad, Pakistan

Shaopeng Wu, Shandong Province Animal Disease Prevention and Control Center, China

Data availability statement

The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/supplementary material, further inquires can be directed to the corresponding author/s.

Ethics statement

The animal study was approved by Ethical Review Board of Yulin University. The study was conducted in accordance with the local legislation and institutional requirements.

Author contributions

AH: Conceptualization, Formal analysis, Investigation, Validation, Writing – original draft. DW: Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Writing – original draft. NZ: Supervision, Writing – review & editing. NW: Supervision, Writing – review & editing. PF: Resources, Writing – review & editing. JZ: Conceptualization, Funding acquisition, Methodology, Project administration, Supervision, Writing – review & editing. YZ: Conceptualization, Funding acquisition, Supervision, Writing – review & editing.

Conflict of interest

The author(s) declared that this work was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Generative AI statement

The author(s) declared that Generative AI was not used in the creation of this manuscript.

Any alternative text (alt text) provided alongside figures in this article has been generated by Frontiers with the support of artificial intelligence and reasonable efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, including review by the authors wherever possible. If you identify any issues, please contact us.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Supplementary material

The Supplementary material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fvets.2026.1783278/full#supplementary-material

References

  • 1.Allen HK, Donato J, Wang HH, Cloud-Hansen KA, Davies J, Handelsman J. Call of the wild: antibiotic resistance genes in natural environments. Nat Rev Microbiol. (2010) 8:251–9. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro2312, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Wang MY, Lu X, Kan B, Chen SG, Fan YB. Research progress on bacterial drug resistance and carrying drug resistance genes in migratory birds. Chin J Prev Med. (2021) 2:271–6. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112150-20200914-01199 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Ramey AM, Ahlstrom CA. Antibiotic resistant bacteria in wildlife: perspectives on trends, acquisition and dissemination, data gaps, and future directions. J Wildl Dis. (2020) 56:1–15. doi: 10.7589/2019-04-099 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Rahman A, Chowdhury MSR, Hossain H, Elsaid FG, Almutairi LA, Begum R, et al. Identification of virulence genes and multidrug resistance in Shiga-toxin producing Escherichia coli (STEC) from migratory and captive wild birds. Pak Vet J. (2024) 44:1120–30. doi: 10.29261/pakvetj/2024.264 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Sánchez-Cano A, López-Calderón C, Cardona-Cabrera T, Green AJ, Höfle U. Connectivity at the human-wildlife interface: starling movements relate to carriage of E. coli. Sci Total Environ. (2024) 926:171899. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.171899, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Carter MQ, Quiñones B, He X, Pham A, Carychao D, Cooley MB, et al. Genomic and phenotypic characterization of Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia albertii strains isolated from wild birds in a major agricultural region in California. Microorganisms. (2023) 11:2803. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms11112803, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Gargiulo A, Fioretti A, Russo TP, Varriale L, Rampa L, Paone S, et al. Occurrence of enteropathogenic bacteria in birds of prey in Italy. Lett Appl Microbiol. (2018) 66:202–6. doi: 10.1111/lam.12836, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Jarma D, Sánchez MI, Green AJ, Peralta-Sánchez JM, Hortas F, Sánchez-Melsió A, et al. Faecal microbiota and antibiotic resistance genes in migratory waterbirds with contrasting habitat use. Sci Total Environ. (2021) 783:146872. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.146872, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Zhang YS, He FQ, Chen RB, Wu Y, Bai L. Breeding habitat selection of relict gull and study on bird community in wetland. Zool Res. (1993) 2:128–35. [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Lei X, Wang WQ, Lian ZM. Analysis of the present situation of the research on the relic gulls in Hongjiannao, Shaanxi. J Yan'an Univ. (2011) 30:93–6. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-602X.2011.04.027 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Yang YF. Isolation, Identification, Drug Resistance gene Detection and multi-locus Sequence Typing of Clinical animal-Derived Escherichia coli. [Ph.D. Thesis]. Yangzhou: Yangzhou University; (2022). [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Lu HL. Isolation, Identification and Drug Resistance Analysis of Pathogenic Escherichia coli from Pigs and Chickens. Chongqing: Southwestern University; (2020). [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Poirel L, Madec JY, Lupo A, Schink AK, Kieffer N, Nordmann P, et al. Antimicrobial resistance in Escherichia coli. Microbiol Spectrum. (2018) 6. doi: 10.1128/microbiolspec.ARBA-0026-2017, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Sadi M, Akkou M, Martínez-Álvarez S, Carvalho I, Fernández-Fernández R, Abdullahi IN, et al. Antimicrobial resistance of Escherichia coli involved in algerian bovine carriage, ESBL detection, integron characterization and genetic lineages. Kafkas Univ Vet Fak Derg. (2024) 30:191–9. doi: 10.9775/kvfd.2023.30670 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Yu R, Ma WJ, Gao S, Zhang QY, Ju HM, Yang YF, et al. Antimicrobial resistance analysis of avian Escherichia coli and detection of β-lactam resistance genes. Chin J Vet Med. (2018) 54:106–8. [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Guo ZW. Isolation, Identification, Drug Resistance gene Detection and multi-locus Sequence Typing of Escherichia coli from Sheep in Northern Shaanxi. [Master Thesis]. Yulin: Yulin University; (2024). [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Song H, Yi S, Kim WH, Guk JH, Ha M, Kwak I, et al. Environmental perturbations during the rehabilitation of wild migratory birds induce gut microbiome alteration and antibiotic resistance acquisition. Microbiol Spectrum. (2022) 10:e0116322. doi: 10.1128/spectrum.01163-22, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Wu J, Huang Y, Rao D, Zhang Y, Yang K. Evidence for environmental dissemination of antibiotic resistance mediated by wild birds. Front Microbiol. (2018) 9:745. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2018.00745, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Antilles N, García-Bocanegra I, Alba-Casals A, López-Soria S, Pérez-Méndez N, Saco M, et al. Occurrence and antimicrobial resistance of zoonotic enteropathogens in gulls from southern Europe. Sci Total Environ. (2021) 763:143018. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.143018, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Ahmed NA, Gulhan T. Determination of antibiotic resistance patterns and genotypes of Escherichia coli isolated from wild birds. Microbiome. (2024) 12:8. doi: 10.1186/s40168-023-01729-1, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Souguir M, Châtre P, Drapeau A, Azaiez S, Hmidi I, Ncir S, et al. CTX-M-15/27-positive Escherichia coli and VIM-2-producing Pseudomonas putida in free-living pigeons (Columba livia) in Tunisia. J Glob Antimicrob Resist. (2024) 36:70–5. doi: 10.1016/j.jgar.2023.12.013, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Islam MS, Sobur MA, Rahman S, Ballah FM, Ievy S, Siddique MP, et al. Detection of bla(TEM), bla(CTX-M), bla(CMY), and bla(SHV) genes among extended-spectrum Beta-lactamase-producing Escherichia coli isolated from migratory birds travelling to Bangladesh. Microb Ecol. (2022) 83:942–50. doi: 10.1007/s00248-021-01803-x, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Guenther S, Grobbel M, Lübke-Becker A, Goedecke A, Friedrich ND, Wieler LH, et al. Antimicrobial resistance profiles of Escherichia Coli from common European wild bird species. Vet Microbiol. (2010) 144:219–25. doi: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2009.12.016, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Zhao H, Sun R, Yu P, Alvarez PJJ. High levels of antibiotic resistance genes and opportunistic pathogenic bacteria indicators in urban wild bird feces. Environ Pollut. (2020) 266:115200. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2020.115200, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Tang F, Wang J, Li D, Gao S, Ren J, Ma L, et al. Comparative genomic analysis of 127 Escherichia coli strains isolated from domestic animals with diarrhea in China. BMC Genomics. (2019) 20:212. doi: 10.1186/s12864-019-5588-2, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Kimura B. Will the emergence of core genome MLST end the role of in silico MLST? Food Microbiol. (2018) 75:28–36. doi: 10.1016/j.fm.2017.09.003, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Hibbing ME, Dodson KW, Kalas V, Chen SL, Hultgren SJ. Adaptation of arginine synthesis among uropathogenic branches of the Escherichia coli phylogeny reveals adjustment to the urinary tract habitat. mBio. (2020) 11:e02318–20. doi: 10.1128/mBio.02318-20, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.O'Neill J. Tackling Drug-Resistant Infections Globally: Final Report and Recommendations. London, England: Review on Antimicrobial Resistance; (2016). [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Elsohaby I, Samy A, Elmoslemany A, Alorabi M, Alkafafy M, Aldoweriej A, et al. Migratory wild birds as a potential disseminator of antimicrobial-resistant bacteria around Al-Asfar Lake, eastern Saudi Arabia. Antibiotics. (2021) 10:260. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics10030260, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Mukerji S, Stegger M, Truswell AV, Laird T, Jordan D, Abraham RJ, et al. Resistance to critically important antimicrobials in Australian silver gulls (Chroicocephalus novaehollandiae) and evidence of anthropogenic origins. J Antimicrob Chemother. (2019) 74:2566–74. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkz242, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Kwaśna N, Majewska M, Karwańska M, Siedlecka M, Pałucki A, Piasecki T. Occurrence and molecular characterization of Escherichia coli strains isolated from black grouse (Lyrurus tetrix) from the Karkonosze National Park in Poland. BMC Vet Res. (2024) 20:38. doi: 10.1186/s12917-024-03886-3, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Zhao S. Study on the Drug Resistance of Escherichia coli and Plasmid-Mediated Drug Resistance Transmission in Fujiazhuang Beach, Dalian. Dalian: Dalian Ocean University; (2018). [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Islam MS, Nayeem MMH, Sobur MA, Ievy S, Islam MA, Rahman S, et al. Virulence determinants and multidrug resistance of Escherichia coli isolated from migratory birds. Antibiotics. (2021) 10:190. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics10020190, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Tarabai H, Krejci S, Karyakin I, Bitar I, Literak I, Dolejska M. Clinically relevant antibiotic resistance in Escherichia coli from black kites in southwestern Siberia: a genetic and phenotypic investigation. mSphere. (2023) 8:e0009923. doi: 10.1128/msphere.00099-23, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Navedo JG, Araya V, Verdugo C. Upraising a silent pollution: antibiotic resistance at coastal environments and transference to long-distance migratory shorebirds. Sci Total Environ. (2021) 777:146004. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.146004, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Şahan Yapicier O, Hesna Kandir E, Öztürk D. Antimicrobial resistance of E. coli and Salmonella isolated from wild birds in a rehabilitation center in Turkey. Arch Razi Inst. (2022) 77:257–67. doi: 10.22092/ari.2021.356322.1823, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Li XQ, Li XD, Lin YH, Zhang W, Xu H, Yang GQ, et al. Analysis of antibiotic resistance of Escherichia coli and enterococci in Sansha Bay. Mar Sci. (2023) 47:138–48. doi: 10.11759/hykx20220524003 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Barguigua A, Rguibi Idrissi H, Nayme K, Timinouni M. Virulence and antibiotic resistance patterns in E. coli, Morocco. EcoHealth. (2019) 16:570–5. doi: 10.1007/s10393-019-01404-8, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Nowaczek A, Dec M, Stępień-Pyśniak D, Urban-Chmiel R, Marek A, Różański P. Antibiotic resistance and virulence profiles of Escherichia coli strains isolated from wild birds in Poland. Pathogens. (2021) 10:1059. doi: 10.3390/pathogens10081059, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Russo TP, Pace A, Varriale L, Borrelli L, Gargiulo A, Pompameo M, et al. Prevalence and antimicrobial resistance of enteropathogenic bacteria in yellow-legged gulls (Larus michahellis) in southern Italy. Animals. (2021) 11:275. doi: 10.3390/ani11020275, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Wang XJ, Tan AJ, Lu SM, Du AD, Chen BL, Zhang SX. Resistance of swine-derived Escherichia coli to tetracyclines and detection of resistance genes in Guizhou Province. Chin Anim Husb Vet Med. (2018) 45:1367–73. doi: 10.16431/j.cnki.1671-7236.2018.05.030 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Fashae K, Engelmann I, Monecke S, Braun SD, Ehricht R. Molecular characterisation of extended-spectrum ß-lactamase producing Escherichia coli in wild birds and cattle, Ibadan, Nigeria. BMC Vet Res. (2021) 17:33. doi: 10.1186/s12917-020-02734-4, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Gu XX, Wu Q, Tao Qiao XC, Ma X, Li J, Zhou X, et al. Detection of aminoglycoside drug resistance phenotypes and resistance genes of sheep-derived Escherichia coli. J Chin Vet Med. (2020) 40:1566–70. doi: 10.16303/j.cnki.1005-4545.2020.08.22 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Martínez-Álvarez S, Châtre P, Cardona-Cabrera T, François P, Sánchez-Cano A, Höfle U, et al. Detection and genetic characterization of bla(ESBL)-carrying plasmids of cloacal Escherichia coli isolates from white stork nestlings (Ciconia ciconia) in Spain. J Glob Antimicrob Resist. (2023) 34:186–94. doi: 10.1016/j.jgar.2023.07.011, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Li Z, Jia C, Hu Z, Jin Y, Li T, Zhang X, et al. Antimicrobial resistance and genomic characteristics of Escherichia coli strains isolated from the poultry industry in Henan Province, China. Microorganisms. (2024) 12:575. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms12030575, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Koreň J, Andrezál M, Ozaee E, Drahovská H, Wawruch M, Liptáková A, et al. High emergence of multidrug-resistant sequence type 131 subclade C2 among extended-Spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL)-producing Escherichia coli isolated from the university hospital Bratislava, Slovakia. Antibiotics. (2023) 12:1209. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics12071209, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Fuentes-Castillo D, Esposito F, Cardoso B, Dalazen G, Moura Q, Fuga B, et al. Genomic data reveal international lineages of critical priority Escherichia coli harbouring wide resistome in Andean condors (Vultur gryphus Linnaeus, 1758). Mol Ecol. (2020) 29:1919–35. doi: 10.1111/mec.15455, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Ievy S, Hoque MN, Islam MS, Sobur MA, Ballah FM, Rahman MS, et al. Genomic characteristics, virulence, and antimicrobial resistance in avian pathogenic Escherichia coli Mtr_Bau02 strain isolated from layer farm in Bangladesh. J Glob Antimicrob Resist. (2022) 30:155–62. doi: 10.1016/j.jgar.2022.06.001, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Kuan NL, Chen YP, Shien JH, Yeh KS. Characteristics of the extended-Spectrum-Β-lactamase-producing Escherichia coli isolated from diseased livestock and poultry in Taiwan. Sci Rep. (2024) 14:29459. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-80943-9, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Dadashi M, Yaslianifard S, Hajikhani B, Kabir K, Owlia P, Goudarzi M, et al. Frequency distribution, genotypes and prevalent sequence types of New Delhi Metallo-β-lactamase-producing Escherichia coli among clinical isolates around the world: a review. J Glob Antimicrob Resist. (2019) 19:284–93. doi: 10.1016/j.jgar.2019.06.008, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/supplementary material, further inquires can be directed to the corresponding author/s.


Articles from Frontiers in Veterinary Science are provided here courtesy of Frontiers Media SA

RESOURCES