Skip to main content
NCBI home page
The Western Journal of Medicine logoLink to The Western Journal of Medicine
. 1997 Sep;167(3):145–148.

Rapid hospital discharge following laparoscopy for ectopic pregnancy. A promise unfulfilled?

L A Learman 1, D A Grimes 1
PMCID: PMC1304513  PMID: 9308406

Abstract

This study was done to determine whether laparoscopy for ectopic pregnancy in the United States is associated with rapid postoperative discharge, defined as 2 days or less, and to estimate how often ambulatory treatment of ectopic pregnancy occurs without subsequent hospital admission. We used the National Hospital Discharge Survey to estimate the frequency of ectopic pregnancy admissions, operations, and length of hospital stays in 1990. We used the National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey to estimate the number, type, and disposition of office visits for ectopic pregnancy in 1990. According to National Hospital Discharge Survey data, tubal pregnancy led to an estimated 57,000 hospital admissions in 1990. Most (70%) of the 26,000 patients treated with laparoscopy were in the hospital 3 days or more, and most (73%) underwent salpingectomy. The number of ambulatory visits for ectopic pregnancy was too low to estimate reliably according to the standards of the National Center for Health Statistics. We found that laparoscopy was used frequently for the treatment of ectopic pregnancy but was not associated with rapid postoperative discharge. Further research is needed to determine whether these findings persist and whether reimbursement incentives, patient preference, or problems with the diffusion of technology are responsible.

Full text

PDF
145

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Baumann R., Magos A. L., Turnbull A. Prospective comparison of videopelviscopy with laparotomy for ectopic pregnancy. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1991 Aug;98(8):765–771. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1991.tb13480.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Brumsted J., Kessler C., Gibson C., Nakajima S., Riddick D. H., Gibson M. A comparison of laparoscopy and laparotomy for the treatment of ectopic pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol. 1988 Jun;71(6 Pt 1):889–892. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Creinin M. D., Washington A. E. Cost of ectopic pregnancy management: surgery versus methotrexate. Fertil Steril. 1993 Dec;60(6):963–969. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Goldner T. E., Lawson H. W., Xia Z., Atrash H. K. Surveillance for ectopic pregnancy--United States, 1970-1989. MMWR CDC Surveill Summ. 1993 Dec 17;42(6):73–85. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Gray D. T., Thorburn J., Lundorff P., Strandell A., Lindblom B. A cost-effectiveness study of a randomised trial of laparoscopy versus laparotomy for ectopic pregnancy. Lancet. 1995 May 6;345(8958):1139–1143. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(95)90977-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Layde P. M., Ory H. W., Peterson H. B., Scally M. J., Greenspan J. R., Smith J. C., Fleming D. The declining length of hospitalization for tubal sterilization. JAMA. 1981 Feb 20;245(7):714–718. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Lipscomb G. H., Stovall T. G., Ling F. W. Basic laparoscopic knowledge among gynecologic laparoscopists. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1994 Dec;171(6):1455–1459. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(94)90387-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Maruri F., Azziz R. Laparoscopic surgery for ectopic pregnancies: technology assessment and public health implications. Fertil Steril. 1993 Mar;59(3):487–498. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(16)55787-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Munro M. G., Reiter R. C., Gambone J. C. Technology assessment in women's health care. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 1994 Mar;37(1):180–191. doi: 10.1097/00003081-199403000-00021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Murphy A. A., Nager C. W., Wujek J. J., Kettel L. M., Torp V. A., Chin H. G. Operative laparoscopy versus laparotomy for the management of ectopic pregnancy: a prospective trial. Fertil Steril. 1992 Jun;57(6):1180–1185. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(16)55070-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Oskowitz S. P., Berger M. J., Mullen L., Smalky M., Alper M., Thompson I. Safety of a freestanding surgical unit for the assisted reproductive technologies. Fertil Steril. 1995 Apr;63(4):874–879. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Ou C. S. Laparoscopic management of ectopic pregnancy. J Reprod Med. 1993 Nov;38(11):849–852. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Rulin M. C. Is salpingostomy the surgical treatment of choice for unruptured tubal pregnancy? Obstet Gynecol. 1995 Dec;86(6):1010–1013. doi: 10.1016/0029-7844(95)00330-T. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Slaughter J. L., Grimes D. A. Methotrexate therapy. Nonsurgical management of ectopic pregnancy. West J Med. 1995 Mar;162(3):225–228. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Vermesh M., Silva P. D., Rosen G. F., Stein A. L., Fossum G. T., Sauer M. V. Management of unruptured ectopic gestation by linear salpingostomy: a prospective, randomized clinical trial of laparoscopy versus laparotomy. Obstet Gynecol. 1989 Mar;73(3 Pt 1):400–404. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Washington A. E., Katz P. Ectopic pregnancy in the United States: economic consequences and payment source trends. Obstet Gynecol. 1993 Feb;81(2):287–292. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Western Journal of Medicine are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES