Skip to main content
Cureus logoLink to Cureus
. 2026 Mar 3;18(3):e104603. doi: 10.7759/cureus.104603

A Case of Cystic Neutrophilic Granulomatous Mastitis in a Young Breastfeeding Woman

Isabella Bayramov 1,, Daniel Glotzer 2
Editors: Alexander Muacevic, John R Adler
PMCID: PMC13045330  PMID: 41939629

Abstract

Cystic neutrophilic granulomatous mastitis (CNGM) is a rare, benign inflammatory breast condition with an unclear etiology. Proposed theories include infection and autoimmune conditions. CNGM often mimics infectious mastitis and inflammatory breast carcinoma, making diagnosis a challenge, especially in breastfeeding patients. Here, we present the case of a 29-year-old breastfeeding woman who developed a painful, ulcerating left breast mass initially suspected to be mastitis or malignancy. Imaging revealed a mixed solid and cystic lesion, and biopsy confirmed CNGM. Her symptoms improved with cephalexin and corticosteroid therapy, and the lesion resolved over two months. This case highlights the diagnostic challenges posed by CNGM and underscores the importance of biopsy for accurate diagnosis. It further suggests that both microbial and immune-mediated processes may contribute to disease development and response to therapy. Continued research is needed to clarify the roles of infectious and autoimmune factors in the pathogenesis and how these etiologies drive the management of CNGM.

Keywords: benign breast condition, benign breast mass, breast disease, cystic neutrophilic granulomatous mastitis, ultrasound breast

Introduction

Granulomatous mastitis (GM) is a rare, benign inflammatory breast condition of uncertain etiology characterized by granuloma formation within the breast tissue. A histologically distinct subtype, cystic neutrophilic granulomatous mastitis (CNGM), is characterized by lipogranulomas containing central lipid vacuoles rimmed by neutrophils and epithelioid histiocytes [1]. Incidence of CNGM is highest in women of child-bearing age, often with a history of pregnancy, and typically presents with a painful, unilateral breast mass [1,2]. Associated clinical features may include erythema, edema, ulceration, an abscess, or nipple involvement.

The rarity of this condition and its similar presentation to other breast conditions, such as inflammatory breast carcinoma, creates a diagnostic challenge. Increasing evidence suggests that CNGM may arise from a combination of microbial and immune-mediated processes. Several studies have demonstrated an association between CNGM and Corynebacterium species, particularly Corynebacterium kroppenstedtii, a lipophilic organism that preferentially colonizes lipid-rich breast tissue and is difficult to culture using standard techniques [3-5]. Other reports describe response to corticosteroid therapy and other immune modulator medications, suggesting a possible autoimmune basis for the disease [1,6,7]. Additionally, associations with hyperprolactinemia, pregnancy, and lactation further suggest a multifactorial process involving hormonal, microbial, and immune mechanisms [2,8,9].

Given the lack of standardized treatment guidelines, management of CNGM remains individualized and guided by limited published data. Here, we present a case of CNGM in a 29-year-old breastfeeding woman that highlights proposed etiologies, diagnostic challenges, and therapeutic considerations relevant to this uncommon but clinically significant condition.

Case presentation

A 29-year-old Caucasian woman presented to the general surgery clinic with a two-week history of a non-healing ulcer of the left breast. She described a palpating lesion in the outer left breast that became erythematous, ulcerated, and started draining. She was four months postpartum at presentation and was breastfeeding. She denied recent fever, nipple discharge, or systemic symptoms. Her medical history was unremarkable. Her maternal grandmother had breast cancer in her 40s.

Physical examination revealed an ulcerated, granulating lesion with an underlying palpable mass at the 3 o’clock position in the left breast. No supraclavicular, infraclavicular, or axillary lymphadenopathy was detected.

Ultrasound mammography of the left breast identified an ill-defined 6.6 cm solid and cystic area in the 3 o’clock position that extended to the dermis (Figure 1). An in-office fine-needle aspiration and incisional biopsy were performed at her initial visit, with cytology negative for malignant cells. Due to persistent concern for underlying pathology, she underwent an ultrasound-guided biopsy two months after initial presentation, revealing histopathologic features consistent with cystic neutrophilic granulomatous mastitis (Figure 2).

Figure 1. Ultrasound at initial visit: (A) antiradial and (B) radial view.

Figure 1

Targeted ultrasound of the left breast at the area of palpable concern obtained at the patient’s initial evaluation demonstrated an ill-defined mixed solid and cystic lesion extending toward the dermis, corresponding to the site of clinical palpation.

Figure 2. Ultrasound at the two-month follow-up: (A) antiradial, (B) radial, and (C) oblique view.

Figure 2

Targeted ultrasound of the left breast performed at the time of ultrasound-guided biopsy, approximately two months after initiation of treatment at the initial visit, demonstrated the previously identified lesion at the biopsy site.

Treatment with antibiotic therapy was initiated prior to consultation with general surgery. An initial trial of doxycycline was ineffective, whereas treatment with cephalexin resulted in symptomatic improvement. Continued treatment with cephalexin was chosen, as well as initiation of a corticosteroid taper. At the two-week follow-up, she had completed all medications, the ulcer was shallower, and only local wound care was continued. The wound was closed at the two-month follow-up, and the mass was barely palpable. Rheumatologic evaluation for underlying autoimmune disease was recommended due to a possible immune-mediated component of CNGM.

Discussion

CNGM is a unique subtype of GM, most commonly presenting in parous women of child-bearing age. Due to overlapping clinical features with more common breast conditions, CNGM is often underrecognized and frequently misdiagnosed. Literature describing cases of CNGM in actively breastfeeding patients remains limited.

The etiology of CNGM is likely multifactorial, involving microbial and autoimmune mechanisms. C. kroppenstedtii has been strongly implicated. Taylor et al. reviewed 34 cases of CNGM in 2003 and identified a correlation with this Corynebacterium species [3]. Although cultures in this case did not isolate the organism, a bacterial cause cannot be excluded. Corynebacterium species are difficult to culture, relatively rare, and often localized within the cystic spaces of the lesion [4]. In 2023, Li et al. demonstrated that in patients with isolated C. kroppenstedtii, bacterial growth was more prominent in lipid-rich areas of the breast, and patients had an increased likelihood of sinus tract formation, similar to the presentation observed in our patient [5].

Hormonal influences may also contribute to disease pathogenesis. Although CNGM has rarely been reported in actively breastfeeding women, associations with hyperprolactinemia, prior parity, and lactation have been described [2,8,9]. In cases reported by Kutsuna et al., two patients with hyperprolactinemia were diagnosed and treated for granulomatous mastitis in which C. kroppenstedtii was isolated [8]. Similarly, Wang et al. examined 62 patients with CNGM and found that 26% had elevated prolactin levels [2]. Elevated prolactin may promote inflammatory responses or facilitate bacterial growth within breast tissue. Further research is needed to clarify the role of prolactin in the development of CNGM.

The clinical course of this patient highlights the diagnostic complexity of CNGM. Presentation with a painful unilateral breast mass accompanied by erythema and ulceration raises concern for infectious mastitis with abscess or inflammatory breast carcinoma. Sarcoidosis, autoimmune conditions, and mycobacterial infection must also be considered in the differential diagnosis [10]. Although cultures were negative, early antibiotic therapy and the known difficulty in culturing Corynebacterium species likely contributed to these findings. Ultrasound imaging and cytology helped narrow the differential diagnosis to granulomatous mastitis and sarcoid granuloma. Ultrasound-guided biopsy was ultimately essential for histopathologic evaluation, definitive diagnosis, and differentiation of CNGM from other subtypes of granulomatous mastitis.

There are currently no established treatment guidelines for CNGM. Antibiotic therapy, particularly with lipophilic agents, has been reported to be beneficial due to the lipid-rich environment favored by Corynebacterium species [2,4,5,11-13]. The use of cephalexin, a more hydrophilic antibiotic, in this patient after a lack of improvement with doxycycline deviates from existing literature recommendations. This finding raises questions regarding the proposed etiologies of the disease and the relative contributions of infectious versus immune-mediated mechanisms.

Corticosteroids and other immunosuppressive therapies have demonstrated efficacy in reported cases, including treatment with dapsone and adalimumab [1,6,7]. Remission in our case following therapy that included immunosuppressive agents supports consideration of rheumatologic evaluation to reduce the risk of recurrence. Surgical excision has not been consistently shown to be effective for CNGM [1]. In this case, conservative medical management resulted in remission, and surgical intervention was not required.

This report has several limitations. It describes a single patient from a single center, which limits generalizability. Microbiologic confirmation of C. kroppenstedtii was not obtained, and prolactin levels were not measured. Additionally, follow-up was limited to two months, precluding assessment of long-term recurrence. Larger prospective studies are needed to better define optimal diagnostic and therapeutic strategies for this condition.

Conclusions

This case underscores the diagnostic and therapeutic challenges of CNGM, particularly in the setting of active lactation. Awareness of CNGM as a potential diagnosis is essential when evaluating atypical or refractory breast inflammation. Tissue biopsy is critical for accurate diagnosis and to avoid unnecessary surgical intervention. The patient’s favorable response to combined antimicrobial and corticosteroid therapy supports a multifactorial disease process involving microbial, immune, and hormonal factors. However, as this report describes a single case with limited follow-up, conclusions regarding pathogenesis and optimal management should be interpreted with caution and are not broadly generalizable. Increased recognition of this entity may facilitate earlier diagnosis, appropriate management, and improved patient outcomes. Further research is needed to clarify the roles of C. kroppenstedtii, hyperprolactinemia, and autoimmune mechanisms in the pathogenesis and management of CNGM.

Disclosures

Human subjects: Informed consent for treatment and open access publication was obtained or waived by all participants in this study. Florida State University Division of Research Office for Human Subjects Protection issued approval STUDY00006948.

Conflicts of interest: In compliance with the ICMJE uniform disclosure form, all authors declare the following:

Payment/services info: All authors have declared that no financial support was received from any organization for the submitted work.

Financial relationships: All authors have declared that they have no financial relationships at present or within the previous three years with any organizations that might have an interest in the submitted work.

Other relationships: All authors have declared that there are no other relationships or activities that could appear to have influenced the submitted work.

Author Contributions

Concept and design:  Isabella Bayramov, Daniel Glotzer

Acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data:  Isabella Bayramov, Daniel Glotzer

Drafting of the manuscript:  Isabella Bayramov, Daniel Glotzer

Critical review of the manuscript for important intellectual content:  Isabella Bayramov, Daniel Glotzer

Supervision:  Daniel Glotzer

References

  • 1.Cystic neutrophilic granulomatous mastitis: an update. Wu JM, Turashvili G. J Clin Pathol. 2020;73:445–453. doi: 10.1136/jclinpath-2019-206180. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Clinical features of cystic neutrophil granulomatous mastitis in 62 cases. Wang M, Zhang D, Fu N, et al. Heliyon. 2025;11:0. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2025.e42415. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.A clinicopathological review of 34 cases of inflammatory breast disease showing an association between corynebacteria infection and granulomatous mastitis. Taylor GB, Paviour SD, Musaad S, Jones WO, Holland DJ. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12745457/ Pathology. 2003;35:109–119. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Cystic neutrophilic granulomatous mastitis: an underappreciated pattern strongly associated with gram-positive bacilli. Renshaw AA, Derhagopian RP, Gould EW. Am J Clin Pathol. 2011;136:424–427. doi: 10.1309/AJCP1W9JBRYOQSNZ. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Clinical characteristics and therapeutic strategy of granulomatous mastitis accompanied by Corynebacterium kroppenstedtii: a retrospective cohort study. Li S, Huang Q, Song P, Han X, Liu Z, Zhou L, Ning P. BMC Womens Health. 2023;23:388. doi: 10.1186/s12905-023-02509-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Cystic neutrophilic granulomatous mastitis treatment with consecutive dapsone and adalimumab. Kamat S, Schaffenburg W, Bongiorno M. Dermatopathology (Basel) 2022;9:408–412. doi: 10.3390/dermatopathology9040047. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Cystic neutrophilic granulomatous mastitis regression with the tumor necrosis factor-α inhibitor, adalimumab. Chiu LW, Goodwin K, Vohra P, Amerson E. Eur J Breast Health. 2022;18:94–101. doi: 10.4274/ejbh.galenos.2021.2021-7-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Two cases of granulomatous mastitis caused by Corynebacterium kroppenstedtii infection in nulliparous young women with hyperprolactinemia. Kutsuna S, Mezaki K, Nagamatsu M, et al. Intern Med. 2015;54:1815–1818. doi: 10.2169/internalmedicine.54.4254. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Analysis of the clinical characteristics and ultrasonographic features in 141 cases of cystic neutrophilic granulomatous mastitis. Wang M, Liu Y, Zhang D, Fu N, Wang Y, Liu M, Zhang H. Acad Radiol. 2025;32:2489–2496. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2024.12.034. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.The histologic diagnosis and the management of cystic neutrophilic granulomatous mastitis: a case report. Houcine Y, Maaoui A, Riahi N, Sakhri S, Driss M. J Med Case Rep. 2024;18:541. doi: 10.1186/s13256-024-04787-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Corynebacterium species isolated from patients with mastitis. Paviour S, Musaad S, Roberts S, et al. Clin Infect Dis. 2002;35:1434–1440. doi: 10.1086/344463. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Cystic neutrophilic granulomatous mastitis - a review of 12 consecutive cases. Maung MH, Bethune GC, Patriquin G, Barnes PJ. Histopathology. 2020;77:781–787. doi: 10.1111/his.14187. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Cystic neutrophilic granulomatous mastitis: The Cleveland Clinic experience with diagnosis and management. Gautham I, Radford DM, Kovacs CS, et al. Breast J. 2019;25:80–85. doi: 10.1111/tbj.13160. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Cureus are provided here courtesy of Cureus Inc.

RESOURCES