Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2026 Apr 3.
Published in final edited form as: Curr Biol. 2025 Jul 7;35(13):R659–R661. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2025.05.022

Development: Growing up to become a regenerative powerhouse

Rachel H Roberts-Galbraith 1
PMCID: PMC13045865  NIHMSID: NIHMS2157205  PMID: 40628232

Summary:

Adult planarian flatworms respond to nearly any injury with a robust, whole-body regenerative response. Recent results demonstrate that planarians develop their regenerative prowess late in embryogenesis, following a late-emerging ability to reestablish anterior polarity.


Freshwater flatworms called planarians have captured the attention of scientists and naturalists for hundreds of years due to their robust regenerative capacity1, 2. Adult planarians respond to injury with a suite of molecular and cellular responses that includes mobilization of adult, pluripotent stem cells called “neoblasts”3, 4. Stem cells divide and differentiate to produce diverse progeny after injury, leading to full reestablishment of organ systems that include an intestine, muscles, neurons, epidermis, and an osmoregulatory protonephridia system5. New organs are created in the correct sizes and places due to the quick reestablishment of axial polarity after injury2. While great progress has been made on understanding regeneration of adult planarians, far less is understood about how and when planarians acquire their regenerative abilities during embryogenesis.

Planarians develop within a brown, opaque cocoon that makes their embryonic development difficult to observe. Scientists spent over a hundred years completing meticulous studies on dissected planarian embryos, which together revealed a process that defies conventions of animal development6-12. Through these studies, planarian embryos were determined to be ectolecithal, with initial blastomeres existing within a soup of yolk cells that eventually fuse into a syncytium. Blastomeres then enter a season of “blastomere anarchy,” dividing and detaching from one another to “wander” through the sea of yolk11. Eventually these wandering blastomeres rise to a sufficient cell number that permits reorganization into a transient epidermis and embryonic pharynx; these structures allow the embryo to ingest the remaining yolk to provide building blocks for growth and to create an internal structure around which form cell layers and, eventually, the intestine11. From mid-development onward, definitive organs are formed. New, columnar epidermal cells replace the transient epidermis, and a definitive pharynx and intestine arise. Similarly, neurons, muscle cells, and protonephridial cells are born and converge into organ primordia. As true organs begin to form, the embryo elongates. Prior to hatching from the cocoon, the embryonic body plan is very similar to that of the earliest juvenile stages. Juvenile planarians emerge with most body systems complete, with one major exception being reproductive structures that are elaborated later. During studies of planarian embryos, evidence emerged that regenerative ability was gained rather than retained over the course of embryogenesis. Several scientists noted that planarian embryos lacked the ability to regenerate until later stages7, 10. In fact, until mid-embryogenesis, planarians fail to complete superficial wound healing and cannot survive outside of the cocoon7. Late in development, planarians gain regenerative capacity, acquiring adult-like regenerative abilities shortly before or after hatching.

The cellular and molecular reason(s) for regenerative failure in planarian embryos has remained unknown. In this issue, Booth and colleagues tackle this exciting, century-old developmental biology mystery13. One plausible reason for regenerative failure could be the lack of neoblasts capable of powering regeneration. Indeed, Davies and colleagues previously profiled dividing stem cells of the planarian Schmidtea mediterranea, revealing key molecular differences between the blastomeres of the embryo and adult neoblasts14. The differences between early blastomeres and late neoblasts have functional importance, as well. Mid-regeneration (stage 5), stem cells transplanted into an irradiated host can engraft but not divide14. By the latest stages of development, stem cells can engraft, divide, and also reestablish the stem cell population of the host14. Using a related planarian, Schmidtea polychroa, Booth and colleagues confirm the central role of stem cells in acquisition of regenerative ability, but also determine that the presence of adult-like stem cells is not sufficient to allow regeneration to proceed13. They also show that stem cells become heterogeneous and respond to injury at a stage prior to onset of full regenerative capacity.

Next, Booth and colleagues sought to determine the proximate cause of regenerative failure in planarian embryos. One important clue came from the observation that tail regeneration in embryos occurs at least a stage earlier than head regeneration13. The posterior bias of regenerative acquisition had also been noted prior in additional planarian species7, 10. Therefore, Booth and colleagues hypothesized that while axial polarity is established relatively early during embryogenesis, the ability to reset axes might be acquired later. Indeed, embryos from nonregenerative stages failed to reestablish anteroposterior markers while embryos in regenerative stages succeeded in resetting polarity13. The posterior bias in embryonic regeneration could also be explained by the observation that planarian embryos gained the ability to reset the posterior pole a stage or more earlier than they succeeded at resetting the anterior pole13. In planarians, anterior polarity is inhibited by the Wnt pathway, through beta-catenin2. Thus, Booth and colleagues confirmed that anterior polarity reset is critical for the acquisition of regenerative ability through an experiment in which they inhibited Wnt signaling in Stage 7 embryos and observed precocious head regeneration13. Taken together, this landmark study convincingly demonstrates that regeneration occurs only in planarian embryos with both regeneration-competent stem cells and an adult-like ability to rebuild all axes of polarity.

One question that remains is why planarian embryos fail at anterior polarity reset up until late in embryogenesis. Planarian polarity cues are produced in body wall muscle15 and anterior polarity cues are produced in longitudinal muscle fibers that depend on the transcription factor-encoding gene myoD16. Interestingly, myoD(RNAi) animals fail at both anterior and posterior regeneration, partly phenocopying the regenerative failure of embryonic planarians. Nonetheless, myoD transcript is expressed in planarian embryos prior to regeneration competence and myocytes are also evident early in development11, 13, 14, suggesting that muscle cell presence is not sufficient for anterior reestablishment. However, muscle maturation and muscle fiber organization have not been fully assessed during planarian embryogenesis, raising the possibility that muscle physiology continues to change in late embryogenesis in ways that promote resilient polarity and regeneration. Further, the nervous system continues to mature in late embryogenesis, with brain condensation, axonal projections, and the nerve plexus all arising in Stage 711, so innervation of muscle could also be important for its anterior-promoting functions.

Another fascinating area of study will be comparative analyses of regeneration through the lens of embryogenesis. Regenerative abilities vary among flatworms and even between planarian species17. Strikingly, adults of several planarian species—Procotyla fluviatilis, Phagocata kawakatsui, and Dendrocoelum lacteum—fail at head regeneration. In all three species, beta-catenin(RNAi) rescues head regeneration18-20, just as it does in the late S. polychroa embryo13. It will be fascinating to see if the mechanisms that drive failure of head regeneration overlap in non-regenerating species and non-regenerating developmental stages. More broadly, there are numerous animals in disparate animal phyla that complete whole-body regeneration, including acoels and Hydra, so the work in this issue sets a strong foundation for discovering and comparing how evolutionarily distant organisms establish their regenerative powers during embryogenesis.

Figure:

Figure:

Planarians regenerate during a series of embryonic stages. Embryonic organs develop and are later replaced by definitive organs that include an intestine, a pharynx, epidermis, a central and peripheral nervous system, muscle, and protonephridia5. Sexual maturation occurs post-embryonically. The gradual exchange of embryonic tissues for definitive organs is represented in a color change from grays to blues. Yellow labels indicate distinct stages of organogenesis, while arrows indicate the timing with which stem cells adopt adult-like properties and embryos adopt adult-like regenerative abilities.

References:

  • 1.Ivankovic M, Haneckova R, Thommen A, Grohme MA, Vila-Farre M, Werner S, and Rink JC (2019). Model systems for regeneration: planarians. Development 146. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Reddien PW (2018). The Cellular and Molecular Basis for Planarian Regeneration. Cell 175, 327–345. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Wenemoser D, Lapan SW, Wilkinson AW, Bell GW, and Reddien PW (2012). A molecular wound response program associated with regeneration initiation in planarians. Genes and Development 26, 988–1002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Wagner DE, Wang IE, and Reddien PW (2011). Clonogenic neoblasts are pluripotent adult stem cells that underlie planarian regeneration. Science 332, 811–816. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Roberts-Galbraith RH, and Newmark PA (2015). On the organ trail: insights into organ regeneration in the planarian. Curr Opin Genet Dev 32, 37–46. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Martin-Duran JM, Monjo F, and Romero R (2012). Planarian embryology in the era of comparative developmental biology. Int J Dev Biol 56, 39–48. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Bardeen C. (1902). Embryonic and Regenerative Development in Planarians. Biological Bulletin 3, 262–288. [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Stevens NM (1904). On the germ cells and the embryology of Planaria simplissima. Proceedings of the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia 56, 208–220. [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Iijima I. (1884). Untersuchungen über den Bau und die Entwicklungsgeschichte der süsswasser-Dendrocoelen (Tricladen). Zeitschrift für wissenschaftliche Zoologie 40, 359–464. [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Le Moigne A. (1966). Etude du développement embryonnaire et recherches sur les cellules de régénération chez l’embryon de la Planaire Polycelis nigra (Turbellarié, Triclade). Journal Embryology and Experimental Morphology 15, 39–60. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Cardona A, Hartenstein V, and Romero R (2005). The embryonic development of the triclad Schmidtea polychroa. Dev Genes Evol 215, 109–131. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Metschnikoff E. (1883). Die Embryologie von Planaria polychroa. Zeitschrift für wissenschaftliche Zoologie 38, 331–354. [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Booth CLT, Stevens BC, Stubbert CA, Kallgren NT, Dieihl EW, and Davies EL (2025). Irradiation-sensitive cells and axis reset are necessary for onset of whole-body regenerative abilities during planarian development. Curr Biol X, X–X. [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Davies EL, Lei K, Seidel CW, Kroesen AE, McKinney SA, Guo L, Robb SM, Ross EJ, Gotting K, and Alvarado AS (2017). Embryonic origin of adult stem cells required for tissue homeostasis and regeneration. eLife 6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Witchley JN, Mayer M, Wagner DE, Owen JH, and Reddien PW (2013). Muscle cells provide instructions for planarian regeneration. Cell reports 4, 633–641. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Scimone ML, Cote LE, and Reddien PW (2017). Orthogonal muscle fibres have different instructive roles in planarian regeneration. Nature 551, 623–628. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Vila-Farre M, Rozanski A, Ivankovic M, Cleland J, Brand JN, Thalen F, Grohme MA, von Kannen S, Grosbusch AL, Vu HT, et al. (2023). Evolutionary dynamics of whole-body regeneration across planarian flatworms. Nat Ecol Evol 7, 2108–2124. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Sikes JM, and Newmark PA (2013). Restoration of anterior regeneration in a planarian with limited regenerative ability. Nature 500, 77–80. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Liu SY, Selck C, Friedrich B, Lutz R, Vila-Farre M, Dahl A, Brandl H, Lakshmanaperumal N, Henry I, and Rink JC (2013). Reactivating head regrowth in a regeneration-deficient planarian species. Nature 500, 81–84. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Umesono Y, Tasaki J, Nishimura Y, Hrouda M, Kawaguchi E, Yazawa S, Nishimura O, Hosoda K, Inoue T, and Agata K (2013). The molecular logic for planarian regeneration along the anterior-posterior axis. Nature 500, 73–76. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES