Skip to main content
Springer logoLink to Springer
. 2026 Apr 2;177(2):88. doi: 10.1007/s11060-026-05545-z

Therapeutic efficacy of dendritic cell vaccination in a novel syngeneic mouse model of diffuse hemispheric glioma, H3 G34-mutant

Geoffrey C Owens 1, Erick M Contreras 1, Jenny C Kienzler 1,8, Janet Treger 1, Horacio Soto 1, Joey R Orpilla 1, Chloe Qiao 1, Julia W Chang 2, Alexander Lee 1, Wi-Jin Kim 1, Matthew Z Sun 1, Sophie F Peeters 1, Jacob A Bethel 1, Aditya M Kondajji 1, Eric C Holland 6, Oren J Becher 7, Linda M Liau 1,3,4, Robert M Prins 1,3,4,5, Anthony C Wang 1,4,
PMCID: PMC13046641  PMID: 41925941

Abstract

Purpose

The prognosis for pediatric high-grade gliomas associated with mutations in the H3-3A gene is very poor. To investigate whether tumor lysate-pulsed dendritic cells (DC) together with checkpoint blockade might be a potential treatment modality for diffuse hemispheric glioma H3 G34-mutant (DHG), we have developed a novel syngeneic mouse model.

Methods

We used the RCAS/tv-A system to target the expression of H3G34R and PDGFβ and knock out p53 in neural progenitors in C57BL/6 neonatal mice. Three independent cell lines were obtained that expressed transcripts associated with oligodendrocyte and interneuron lineages. Lethal tumor developed following intracranial injection.

Results

Two cycles of DC vaccination with PD-1 blockade decreased tumor burden and increased survival. In treatment resistant tumors we found higher expression of several genes involved in remodeling the extracellular matrix compared with tumors from untreated animals, suggesting a causal link to resistance to immunotherapy in this tumor model.

Conclusion

Immunotherapy involving autologous dendritic cells pulsed with tumor lysate and combined with anti-PD-1 antibody might be an effective treatment for DHG. Treatment failure in our tumor model is associated with increased expression of genes implicated in remodeling extracellular matrix in the tumor microenvironment.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11060-026-05545-z.

Keywords: Diffuse hemispheric glioma, Dendritic cell vaccine, PD-1 checkpoint blockade, Syngeneic mouse tumor, Extracellular matrix

Introduction

High-grade gliomas (HGG) are among the most lethal human cancers with median overall survival typically under two years from initial diagnosis [1, 2]. Recurrence after surgery is almost universal because tumor cells infiltrate the surrounding brain making a complete surgical excision essentially impossible. Pre-clinical studies involving checkpoint blockade and active vaccination have shown promise in addressing the problem of recurrence in HGG [3]. HGG seen in adult patients tend to be heterogeneous and often involve copy number variability, without highly conserved truncal mutations suitable for immune targeting [4]. HGG are generally low in somatic mutational burden [5], which is frequently a negative predictor of response to immunotherapy [6].

There are reasons to believe that the pediatric forms of HGG will respond differently to immunotherapy than adult forms of HGG, as they consistently carry a small number of oncogenic driver mutations [7]. Juvenile presentation of HGG has been shown to frequently involve somatic mutations in the H3-3A gene, which encodes a histone H3 variant [7, 8]. Missense mutations at codons K27 or G34 have divergent effects on gene expression [9, 10] that is context-dependent [1113]. Diffuse hemispheric glioma, H3 G34-mutant (DHG) display distinct characteristics that differentiate it from the better-characterized diffuse midline glioma H3 K27-altered (DMG). DHG most commonly occurs later in childhood, and is typically cortical and lobar in location, in contrast with the midline or diencephalic location of DMG. TP53 and ATRX/DAXX mutations have been reported in 95% and 84% of DHG respectively, with PDGFRA alterations in 44% of newly diagnosed tumors, and 81% at recurrence [1417].

Cellular profiling of resected DHG has revealed that they are relatively devoid of infiltrating immune cells [18], and indicate that there may be few immunogenic tumor-specific antigens (TSAs), however recent work indicates that DHG may be amenable to immune therapy [19]. In order to study susceptibility of DHG to immunotherapy, we used the Replication-Competent Avian leukosis virus long terminal repeat with Splice acceptor (RCAS)/tumor virus-a (tv-a) system [20, 21] to generate syngeneic H3G34R pediatric HGG lines. We then utilized this immunocompetent model to test the efficacy of targeted dendritic cell (DC) vaccination in combination with anti-PD-1 checkpoint blockade in pre-clinical experiments.

Results

Generation of syngeneic murine H3G34R pediatric high-grade gliomas

Intraventricular injections of DF-1 cells producing viruses encoding PDGF-B, Cre recombinase, and H3-3A G34R into postnatal day 2–3 C56Bl/6J Tp53fl/fl Tg (Nestin-tv-A) mice were made, and three non-clonal tumor lines were established from three different animals. The presence of the H3G34R mutation in each independently derived line was confirmed by genomic PCR using a primer set that would only amplify the inserted H3-3 A G34R transgene (Fig. 1a). We used Gene Set Variation Analysis (GSVA) to compare RNA transcripts from the three lines (Table S1) with gene signatures derived from single cell RNA-sequencing 14 human DHG G34R tumors [22]. On a scale of -1 to + 1 positive scores indicate higher expression of genes associated with a gene signature. RCAS1 and RCAS2 cells had attributes of radial glia neural progenitor-like cells; in addition, RCAS2 cells expressed genes associated with a metaprogram that defines an interneuron-like progenitor (Fig. 1b and Fig. S1). As shown in Fig. 1c, genes that define oligodendrocyte progenitor cells (Cspg4, Olig1, Pdgfra, Sox10) [23, 24], and stemness (Olig2, Pou3f2, Sall2 and Sox2) [25] were expressed in the three RCAS-derived H3G34R lines (RCAS/H3G34R) (Fig. 1c). Figure 1c also shows the expression of transcription factors involved in specifying GABAergic interneurons (Arx, Gsx1, Hes1, and Prox1) [2628], and Gad1, the gene encoding a glutamate decarboxylase, which catalyzes the synthesize of gamma-aminobutyric acid from glutamate. All three lines expressed nestin RNA (Table S1), and protein expression in RCAS2 cells was confirmed by immunostaining (Fig. 1d). The RCAS2 cell line showed the highest concordance with both RGNPC and INPCeIN gene signatures and was selected for the in vivo experiments. Orthotopic delivery of RCAS2 cells expressing firefly luciferase resulted in the robust growth of intracranial tumors after 28 days (Fig. 1e and f).

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

DHG model. (a) Chromatograms showing the presence of the G34R mutation in three independently derived RCAS/H3G34R tumor lines. The G to A transition results in a T on the opposite strand (highlighted in grey). The H3-3A G34R sequence was amplified with primers that flanked the transgene within the integrated RCAS provirus. (b) Bar graph showing Gene Set Variation Analysis (GSVA) scores derived by comparing the normalized filtered transcripts from the three RCAS cell lines with gene signatures derived from single cell RNA-sequencing human DHG G34R tumors. Ac-like, astrocyte-like cells; Mes-like, mesenchymal-like cels; RGNPC, radial glia-like to neuron progenitor-like cells; INPCeIN, interneuron progenitor to early GABAergic interneuron-like cells (c) Heat map of z scores calculated from the normalized transcript data showing variable expression between the RCAS/H3G34R lines of selected genes linked to oligodendrocyte progenitor cells (Cspg4, Olig1, Pdgfra, Sox10), neural stem cells (Olig2, Pou3f2, Sall2, and Sox2), and development of GABAergic interneurons (Arx, Gad1, Gsx1, Hes1, and Prox1). (d) Immunofluorescence image of RCAS2 cells stained for nestin. Scale bar = 50 microns (e) Hematoxylin/eosin-stained coronal section of cerebral cortex showing the development of a large tumor mass after implantation of RCAS2/H3G34R cells. Scale bar = 250 microns. The inset shows the position of the tumor in a coronal section of the whole brain. (f) Bioluminescence signal in the brains of mice implanted with RCAS2/H3G34R cells

Treatment with tumor lysate-pulsed dendritic cells and anti-PD-1 monoclonal antibodies provides a survival benefit

We next asked whether DC vaccination together with checkpoint blockade would provide a survival benefit in our syngeneic DHG model. Forty animals were implanted with RCAS/H3G34R tumor cells via intracranial injection and randomized into two groups. After 7 days the presence of tumors was assessed by luciferase-catalyzed bioluminescence. Animals with evidence of tumor (n = 19) were injected intradermally with 106 bone marrow-derived DCs pulsed with tumor lysate, followed by an intraperitoneal injection of PD-1 monoclonal antibody (mAb). Control tumor-bearing animals (n = 17) received an IgG1 isotype mAb without DC vaccination. PD-1 mAb and isotype mAb were administered again 48 h later [29]. The treatment group received a second round of DC vaccination and PD-1 mAb after 14 days (Fig. 2a). Tumor growth was monitored by measuring bioluminescence, and we observed a decrease in average tumor size between the treated and control 22 days after the second DC vaccination, coincident with the loss of more control animals (Fig. 2b), after which we stopped the in vivo imaging. As shown in Fig. 2c DC vaccinated animals survived longer than any of the animals in the control group. All the surviving mice were sacrificed on day 83.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

DC vaccination provides survival benefit (a) Schematic outline of the protocol used to treat animals after orthotopic placement of RCAS/H3G34R tumor cells. (b) Tumor growth monitored by in vivo imaging (mean radiance within region of interest in photons/second/cm2/solid angle). (c) Kaplan-Meier plot showing a significant survival benefit over time after DC vaccination combined with PD-1 blockade (p = 0.0187, Mantel-Cox test)

Increased number of CD8+ T cells in tumors treated with tumor lysate-pulsed dendritic cells

We have previously shown that the survival benefit of DC vaccination with concurrent PD-1 blockade is completely dependent upon CD8+ T cells [29]. To determine whether DC vaccination plus PD-1 inhibition resulted in increased T cells in implanted RCAS/H3G34R tumors we repeated the first in vivo experiment and sacrificed tumor-bearing animals on day 7 after the second injection of DCs (28 days after tumor implantation). Brains were dissociated to obtain an immune cell-enriched fraction. As shown in Fig. 3, the proportion of CD8+ T cells in CD45+/CD3+ cells in tumor infiltrating leukocytes (TILs) from animals treated with DCs pulsed with tumor lysate was markedly higher. CD3/CD11b+ myeloid cells were predominantly Ly6C+, indicating that they were likely derived from circulating monocytes (Fig. 3).

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

Increased CD8+ T cells in TIL fractions from DC-treated animals. Seven days after the second DC vaccination, TILs were isolated from the brains of treated and untreated animals (two animals per group) and analyzed by flow cytometry. TILs were stained with a panel comprising CD45, CD3, CD4, CD8, CD11b, and Ly6C antibodies

Increased expression of genes associated with remodeling the extracellular matrix in animals that failed treatment

Although the immunotherapy protocol appeared to be effective in our tumor model, only a quarter of the treated mice survived to the end of the experiment. To investigate the cause of treatment failure, we dissected the tumors from three treated animals that had succumbed to the tumor burden after the second DC vaccine, and tumors from three untreated animals that died in the same timeframe (40 to 60 days post implantation) and extracted RNA for RNAseq. The estimated tumor purity of all six samples was approximately the same (58% ± 2.5%) [30].

Principal Component Analysis (PCA) using all normalized transcript counts did not show any obvious similarity between each sample (Fig. S2). However, by grouping the treated and untreated samples and applying differential gene expression analysis (DESeq2, adjusted p-value of < 0.01 and > 2-fold difference) we identified six genes, Col9a1, Fkbp10, Postn, Adamts12, Adamts20 and Cpxm1 with higher levels of expression in the tumors taken from treated tumor-bearing mice compared with tumors from untreated animals (Fig. 4a). Col19a1 encodes an alpha chain of Type IX collagen a fibril-associated collagen with interrupted triple helices (FACIT) collagen [31]; Fkb10 encodes FK506 binding protein 65, a peptidyl-prolyl cis-trans isomerase that catalyzes a rate limiting step in triple helical procollagen formation [32]; Postn encodes periostin, a secreted signaling protein found in extracellular matrix (ECM) [33]; ADAMTS12 and 20 are extracellular metalloproteases [34], and CPXM1 is a secreted collagen-binding protein [35]. Higher levels of POSTN, FKBP10, CPXM1, and COL9A1 mRNAs in brain tumors are associated with shorter survival times [36] (Fig. S3).

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4

RNA transcripts associated with treatment failure encode extracellular matrix genes. (a) Volcano plot showing the results of the pairwise comparison between RNA transcripts between tumors taken from treated and untreated animals that succumbed to tumor burden. The top 6 genes overrepresented in the treated tumors are shown in orange. (b) Heat map of the z scores calculated from the normalized counts of 27 genes whose expression was significantly higher in treatment resistant tumors compared to untreated tumors (padj < 0.05; 1.5-fold difference). (c) GSEA plot showing significant enrichment in an epithelial to mesenchymal transition gene signature in treatment resistant tumors. Nominal p-value and false discovery rate are calculated from a permutation statistic (d) Heat map of the z scores calculated from the normalized counts of the highest ranked genes (metric score > 1). Vcan, Postn, and Col6a2 are found in both heatmaps

By relaxing the significance and fold difference thresholds to p < 0.05 and 1.5-fold difference, we identified an additional 21 genes (Fig. 4b). PCA using these genes clearly partitioned the treated and untreated tumor samples (Fig. S2). Postn was the most connected node in a network constructed from Pearson correlation coefficients > 0.9, between these differentially expressed genes (Fig. S4a). Gene set enrichment analysis [37] showed a significant enrichment in a gene signature associated with epithelial to mesenchymal transition (EMT) (Fig. 4c), and periostin was among the top ranked genes in this gene signature (Fig. 4d). Immunocytochemistry confirmed the expression of periostin in implanted RCAS/H3G34 tumors (Fig. S4b).

Discussion

In this report, we provide preclinical support for treating DHG with tumor-targeted DCs. In our survival experiment, combined tumor lysate-pulsed DCs and PD1 blockade provided a demonstrable therapeutic benefit. This personalized treatment approach does not require the identification of specific neoantigens and has been shown to result in extended survival of some adult patients with recurrent HGG [38]. Although it has been reported that oncohistone-driven pediatric HGG in the HERBY Phase II trial were immunologically cold [39], a peptide that spans the H3K27M mutation has been shown to elicit a CD8+ T cell response in patients with DMG [40]. While the HLA-A*02 restricted peptide vaccine alone may be not therapeutically effective [41], a longer K27M-spanning peptide targeting a CD4+ T cell response showed significant promise [42]. The H3G34R/V mutant protein has not been shown to serve as an immunogenic tumor specific antigen; however, our experiments demonstrate that DHG might be, in principle, susceptible to this type of immunotherapy.

In the syngeneic murine tumor model of DHG that we developed autocrine PDGF signaling was driven by introducing a transgene encoding PDGFβ, which has been shown to lead to the development of high grade gliomas in the context of inactivating or suppressing CDKN2A or P53 [24, 43]. It has been reported that while H3G34R may be necessary to transform neural progenitor cells, it may not be required for persistence of the transformed state [13], which may involve activating PDGFRA mutations or PDGFRA copy number amplification [17]. Further work is required to determine the relative contributions of the H3G34R transgene and PDGF signaling to oncogenesis in our tumor model.

Recent reports provide evidence that the cell of origin of DHG G34 tumors is a ventral forebrain interneuron progenitor [17, 22]. The RCAS/H3G34R lines we generated expressed transcripts linked to both interneuron and oligodendroglia lineages, and to transcripts encoding TFs that maintain neural stem cells in a proliferative and uncommitted state [25]. Both neuronal and glia progenitors are present in the subventricular zone (SVZ) of early postnatal mouse brain [44], and would be the likely targets of the viruses produced by the DF-1 cells that we injected. In future work employing single cell RNA-sequencing we will determine whether genes linked to each lineage are expressed by the same cells. It should be noted that the different gene signatures derived from single cell RNA sequencing DHG GR34 tumors that we used in GSVA attests to the heterogeneity of these tumors [22].

Starting from an approximately equal tumor burden, about a quarter of the animals that were treated survived to the stopping point of the experiment while the rest did not. This difference might be attributable to technical variability; however, we obtained transcriptomic data from non-survivors to indicate that changes in gene expression may account for therapeutic failure. Specifically, we found that genes associated with ECM were significantly higher in treated non survivors compared with untreated non survivors suggesting the possibility of an active response by the tumor to the immunotherapy that involves remodeling the ECM. Periostin is the top ranked gene in the EMF gene signature and Postn transcripts were significantly higher in the treatment resistant tumors. Periostin promotes procollagen maturation via interaction with BMP-1 (Bone morphogenetic protein-1, pro-collagen C-proteinase), which activates lysyl oxidase preprotein (LOX) by cleaving the N-terminal propeptide [45]. LOX catalyzes the covalent crosslinking of collagen fibrils, thus periostin promotes the assembly of triple helical collagen [45]. It has been reported that periostin secreted by glioma stem cells recruits immunosuppressive macrophages to the TME via integrin binding [46], and we detected Postn RNA transcripts in our RCAS/HG34R cell lines (Table S1). Stromal cells are also a source of periostin [47]. Higher POSTN mRNA in brain tumors is associated with poorer patient survival (Fig. S3), and resistance to temozolamide by glioblastomas is correlated with increased expression of periostin [48]. Pre-clinical studies with peripheral tumor models have shown that specifically blocking periostin with an antibody [49, 50] or a DNA aptamer [51] inhibited tumor growth and metastasis.

Materials and methods

Derivation of a model of diffuse hemispheric glioma, H3 G34-mutant

All animal experimental protocols were approved by the UCLA Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee. Surgical procedures were performed in a BSL2 biological safety cabinet. RCAS/H3G34R were generated similarly to Misuraca et al. [21]. Postnatal day 2–3 pups were anesthetized with a mixture isofluorane/oxygen delivered through a nose cone trimmed to fit the neonate. Two microliters of packaging cells comprising equal numbers of DF1 cells producing RCAS viruses encoding H3G34R, Cre recombinase, and PDGF-B in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) were injected (1.0 × 105 cells per µl) into the left lateral ventricle through a 28-gauge needle attached to a 10 µl Hamilton syringe. The needle penetrated the skull to a depth of 2 mm at a location 0.25 mm lateral to the sagittal suture and 0.5–0.75 mm rostral to the neonatal coronary suture. Animals were returned to their home cages and monitored daily after weaning for signs of tumor formation as evidenced by loss of body weight and problems with locomotion, at which point the animal was euthanized with CO2, and the brain removed. The Brain Tumor Dissociation Kit (P) (Miltenyi Biotec Inc., Auburn, CA) was used to dissociate mouse brains, which were then fractionated on a 70%/30% Percoll® gradient (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO) to the remove myelin. Cells were placed in culture in medium formulated to support the growth of human pediatric DMG [52]: 1: 1 DME/F12: Neural Basal medium, 1x Minimum Essential Amino Acids, sodium pyruvate (10mM), HEPES (10mM), 1x GlutaMAX and EGF (10 ng/ml), bFGF (10 ng/ml), PDGFa/b (10 ng/ml) (ThermoFisher, Waltham, MA), and heparin solution (5 IU/ml; Sigma Aldrich St. Lous, MO). All injected animals were sacrificed after eighteen weeks.

Orthotopic delivery of tumor cells and treatment protocol

RCAS/H3G34R tumor cells were expanded and transduced with a third generation VSV-G pseudo-typed HIV-based recombinant lentivirus encoding strawberry fluorescent protein and firefly luciferase open reading frames linked by an internal ribosome entry site, and under the transcriptional control of the CMV IE promoter. Under ketamine/xylazine anesthesia, a burr hole was drilled in the skull 2 mm lateral to Bregma and 0.5 mm caudal and injections of 1 × 105 RCAS/H3G34R tumor cells in 2 µL of PBS were made into the left hemispheres of eight-week-old syngeneic C57Bl/6J female mice. Cells were injected through a 28-gauge needle attached to a 10 µl Hamilton syringe at a depth of 2.5 mm. DCs were prepared from bone marrow (BM) essentially as previously described [29]. In brief, BM cells were plated in RPMI-1640 plus 10% fetal bovine serum (PBS) with antibiotics, and after 24 h the nonadherent cells were counted and re-plated in 12-well tissue culture plates (~ 2 × 106 cells per well) in RPMI-1640 plus 10% FBS supplemented with murine granulocyte-macrophage colony stimulating factor (100 ng/ml; Biolegend, San Diego, CA) and interleukin-4 (500 U/ml; Biolegend). The medium was replaced after three days, and three days later the adherent differentiated DCs were pulsed overnight with 250 µg per well of a freeze thawed lysate of untransduced RCAS/H3G34R tumors cells per well. An aliquot of cells was stained with anti-mouse CD11c, F4/80, CD86 and I-Ad antibodies and analyzed by flow cytometry to confirm that they were differentiated DCs. Cells were harvested, washed, resuspended in PBS and 1 × 106 cells were injected intradermally seven days after tumor implantation together with an IP injection of anti-mouse PD-1 (250 µg per animal; clone RMP1-14; Bio X Cell, Lebanon, NH). PD-1 mAb was re-administered 48 h later. The same treatment regimen was repeated 21 days after tumor implantation. In vivo imaging was performed under isoflurane anesthesia after IP injection of luciferin (100 µl of 5 mg/ml stock solution). Chemiluminescence images were captured using an IVIS Lumina II imaging system (Perkin Elmer, Waltham, MA) to measure tumor burden. Log transformed mean radiance values and standard errors, and survival data were analyzed and plotted in GraphPad Prism (GraphPad Software Corp., San Diego, CA). Graphs were exported as enhanced metafiles to CorelDraw2023 (Corel Corporation, Ottawa, Canada).

DNA sequencing

Genomic DNA was isolated from cultured RCAS/H3G34R tumor cells using a commercially available kit (Quick-DNA miniprep kit, Zymo Research, Irvine CA). To confirm the presence of the G34R mutation, PCR primers flanking the cloning site in the RCAS vector were used to amplify inserted sequences (forward primer 5’ GTCTGTGTGCTGCAGGAGCTGAGCTGACTCTGCTG 3’, reverse primer 5’ GATACGCGTATATCTGGCCCGTACATCGCATCG 3’) using Q5® DNA polymerase (New England Biolabs, Ipswich, MA) with the following conditions: 98 °C 2 min → 35 cycles (98 °C 15 s, 68 °C 30 s, 72 °C 30 s) → 72º C 2 min. PCR products were treated with ExoSAP-IT™ (ThermoFisher)) then sequenced using an H3.3-specific primer (5’GCACGTTCTCCACGTATGCGGCGTG 3’).

RNA sequencing

Total RNA was extracted using a commercially available kit (Direct-zol RNA kit; Zymo Research) from mouse RCAS/H3G34R cells and RCAS/H3G34R tumors dissected from mouse brains. Libraries were constructed with a KAPA Stranded mRNA-Seq Kit (Roche Diagnostics Corp, Indianapolis, IN), and sequencing was performed on a HiSeq3000 sequencer to produce 50 base-pair single-end reads (1 × 50 bp) (Illumina Inc., San Diego, CA). Reads were aligned to genes in the mouse genome assembly GRCm38 (mm10) using STAR [53]. The R package DEBrowser was used to filter (< 1 counts per million) and normalize (Trimmed median of the M-values) [54] raw counts, and for differential gene expression using the filtered counts (DESeq2) [55].The R package GSVA was used for gene set variation analysis [56]; Graphia [57], Gene Set Enrichment Analysis [37, 58], and Morpheus by Broad Institute (RRID: SCR_017386) were also used. Graphical data were exported in pdf format to CorelDraw2023.

Flow Cytometry

A leukocyte fraction was isolated from tumor-bearing animals by dissociating brain tissue as described above and fractionating on a 30%:70% Percoll® gradient. The following mAbs were used to label cells: CD45 (Alexa Fluor (AF) 700-conjugated; clone 30-F11), CD3 (Allophycocyanin (APC)-Cyanine 7 (Cy7)-conjugated; clone 145-2C11), CD4 (APC-conjugated; clone RM4-5), CD8 (Phycoerythrin (PE)-Cy7-conjugated; clone 53 − 6.7), CD11b (PE-conjugated; clone M1/70, Ly6C (BV650-conjugated; clone Hk1.4), plus Zombie Violet™. DCs were stained both with CD11c (PerCP-Cyanine5.5-conjugated; clone) and F4/80 (FITC-conjugated, clone BM8), and with CD86 (PerCP-Cyanine5.5-conjugated; clone GL-1) and IAd (FITC-conjugated; clone AF6-120.1). All antibodies were purchased from Biolegend (San Diego, CA), and samples were run on a LSRII analytical flow cytometer (Becton Dickinson, Franklin Lakes, NJ). Individual FCS files were analyzed using FlowJo® software (FlowJo LLC, Ashland, OR); 2-D contour plots were exported as scalable graphics vector files to CorelDraw2023.

Immunocytochemistry

Brains from tumor-bearing animals were fixed by immersion in formalin-free zinc fixative (Becton Dickinson, San Diego, CA), embedded in paraffin and sectioned. Deparaffinized sections were treated with hydrogen peroxide (3%) for 10 min., followed by antigen retrieval in 10 mM citrate buffer (pH 6.0 containing 0.05% Tween20) for 15 min. at 114–121 ℃ in a TintoRetriever Pressure Cooker (BioSB, Inc., Santa Barbara, CA). Sections were blocked and stained with a periostin mouse monoclonal antibody Ab (1:2000, ProteinTech Group, Inc., Rosemont, IL). Staining was visualized with an HRP-conjugated horse anti-mouse secondary Ab and 3, 3’-diaminobenzidine (ImmPRESS kit, Vector Laboratories, Inc., Newark, CA), Vector Laboratories, Inc., Newark, CA), followed by counterstaining with hematoxylin. Images were acquired using an Aperio ScanScope XT scanner (Aperio, Vista CA), then transferred to CorelPhoto-Paint, and rescaled from 72 dpi to 600 dpi. Brightness and contrast were adjusted in CorelDraw. RCAS2 were grown in a chamber slide on a poly L-lysine/laminin substratum (Life Technologies), then fixed with paraformaldehyde (4% in PBS), and blocked with 10% goat serum in Tris-buffered saline containing 0.3% Triton X100. Cells were incubated overnight at 4 °C with an anti-mouse nestin antibody (1:500, 10C2, Life Technologies) in blocking solution followed by washing then incubation in Alexa Fluor® 568 goat anti-mouse secondary antibody (1:1000, Life Technologies) in blocking solution for 1 h at room temperature, and cover-slipping with ProLong® Gold anti-fade reagent containing DAPI (Life Technologies). Fluorescent images were acquired with an Olympus spinning disk confocal microscope (Olympus America, Inc., Center Valley, PA) controlled by SlideBook™ image acquisition and analysis software (Intelligent Imaging Innovations, Inc. Denver CO). Images were transferred to CorelPhoto-Paint, and rescaled from 72 dpi to 600 dpi, and brightness and contrast were adjusted in CorelDraw.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary Material 1 (43.6KB, pdf)
Supplementary Material 3 (52.7KB, pdf)
Supplementary Material 5 (1.7MB, xlsx)

Acknowledgements

RNA sequencing was performed by the Technology Center for Genomics and Bioinformatics, Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine, UCLA.

Author contributions

Conceptualization: GO, EH, OB, LL, RP, AWInvestigation: GO, EC, JT, HS, JO, CQ, JC, AL, WJK, MS, SP, JB, AK, AWResources: EH, OB, LL, RP, AWFunding acquisition: SP, RP, LL, AWProject Administration: GO, RP, AWWriting – original draft: GO, AWWriting – review & editing: GO, WJK, MS, SP, RP, AWAll authors reviewed the manuscript.

Funding

DOD CDMRP RA220179 (AW), NIH/NCI SPORE in Brain Cancer P50CA211015 (LL), Parker Institute for Cancer Immunotherapy (RP), Southeastern Brain Tumor Foundation and NREF Research Fellowship Grant on behalf of the AANS/CNS Section on Tumors (SP).

Data availability

All data supporting the findings of this study are available within the paper and its Supplementary Information.

Declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Footnotes

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

References

  • 1.Deorah S, Lynch CF, Sibenaller ZA, Ryken TC (2006) Trends in brain cancer incidence and survival in the United States: Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program, 1973 to 2001. Neurosurg Focus 20:E1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Stupp R, Mason WP, van den Bent MJ, Weller M, Fisher B, Taphoorn MJ, Belanger K, Brandes AA, Marosi C, Bogdahn U, Curschmann J, Janzer RC, Ludwin SK, Gorlia T, Allgeier A, Lacombe D, Cairncross JG, Eisenhauer E, Mirimanoff RO (2005) R. European Organisation for, T. Treatment of Cancer Brain, G. Radiotherapy, and G. National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials, Radiotherapy plus concomitant and adjuvant temozolomide for glioblastoma. N Engl J Med 352:987–996 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Weller M, Roth P, Preusser M, Wick W, Reardon DA, Platten M, Sampson JH (2017) Vaccine-based immunotherapeutic approaches to gliomas and beyond. Nat Rev Neurol 13:363–374 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Brennan CW, Verhaak RG, McKenna A, Campos B, Noushmehr H, Salama SR, Zheng S, Chakravarty D, Sanborn JZ, Berman SH, Beroukhim R, Bernard B, Wu CJ, Genovese G, Shmulevich I, Barnholtz-Sloan J, Zou L, Vegesna R, Shukla SA, Ciriello G, Yung WK, Zhang W, Sougnez C, Mikkelsen T, Aldape K, Bigner DD, Van Meir EG, Prados M, Sloan A, Black KL, Eschbacher J, Finocchiaro G, Friedman W, Andrews DW, Guha A, Iacocca M, O’Neill BP, Foltz G, Myers J, Weisenberger DJ, Penny R, Kucherlapati R, Perou CM, Hayes DN, Gibbs R, Marra M, Mills GB, Lander E, Spellman P, Wilson R, Sander C, Weinstein J, Meyerson M, Gabriel S, Laird PW, Haussler D, Getz G, Chin L (2013) and T.R. Network, The somatic genomic landscape of glioblastoma. Cell 155 462 – 77 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 5.Chalmers ZR, Connelly CF, Fabrizio D, Gay L, Ali SM, Ennis R, Schrock A, Campbell B, Shlien A, Chmielecki J, Huang F, He Y, Sun J, Tabori U, Kennedy M, Lieber DS, Roels S, White J, Otto GA, Ross JS, Garraway L, Miller VA, Stephens PJ, Frampton GM (2017) Analysis of 100,000 human cancer genomes reveals the landscape of tumor mutational burden. Genome Med 9:34 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Yarchoan M, Hopkins A, Jaffee EM (2017) Tumor Mutational Burden and Response Rate to PD-1 Inhibition. N Engl J Med 377:2500–2501 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Schwartzentruber J, Korshunov A, Liu XY, Jones DT, Pfaff E, Jacob K, Sturm D, Fontebasso AM, Quang DA, Tonjes M, Hovestadt V, Albrecht S, Kool M, Nantel A, Konermann C, Lindroth A, Jager N, Rausch T, Ryzhova M, Korbel JO, Hielscher T, Hauser P, Garami M, Klekner A, Bognar L, Ebinger M, Schuhmann MU, Scheurlen W, Pekrun A, Fruhwald MC, Roggendorf W, Kramm C, Durken M, Atkinson J, Lepage P, Montpetit A, Zakrzewska M, Zakrzewski K, Liberski PP, Dong Z, Siegel P, Kulozik AE, Zapatka M, Guha A, Malkin D, Felsberg J, Reifenberger G, von Deimling A, Ichimura K, Collins VP, Witt H, Milde T, Witt O, Zhang C, Castelo-Branco P, Lichter P, Faury D, Tabori U, Plass C, Majewski J, Pfister SM, Jabado N (2012) Driver mutations in histone H3.3 and chromatin remodelling genes in paediatric glioblastoma. Nature 482:226–231 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Wu G, Broniscer A, McEachron TA, Lu C, Paugh BS, Becksfort J, Qu C, Ding L, Huether R, Parker M, Zhang J, Gajjar A, Dyer MA, Mullighan CG, Gilbertson RJ, Mardis ER, Wilson RK, Downing JR, Ellison DW, Zhang J, Baker SJ (2012) St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital-Washington University Pediatric Cancer Genome, Somatic histone H3 alterations in pediatric diffuse intrinsic pontine gliomas and non-brainstem glioblastomas. Nat Genet 44:251–253 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Lewis PW, Muller MM, Koletsky MS, Cordero F, Lin S, Banaszynski LA, Garcia BA, Muir TW, Becher OJ, Allis CD (2013) Inhibition of PRC2 activity by a gain-of-function H3 mutation found in pediatric glioblastoma. Science 340:857–861 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Bjerke L, Mackay A, Nandhabalan M, Burford A, Jury A, Popov S, Bax DA, Carvalho D, Taylor KR, Vinci M, Bajrami I, McGonnell IM, Lord CJ, Reis RM, Hargrave D, Ashworth A, Workman P, Jones C (2013) Histone H3.3. mutations drive pediatric glioblastoma through upregulation of MYCN. Cancer Discov 3:512–519 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Sturm D, Witt H, Hovestadt V, Khuong-Quang DA, Jones DT, Konermann C, Pfaff E, Tonjes M, Sill M, Bender S, Kool M, Zapatka M, Becker N, Zucknick M, Hielscher T, Liu XY, Fontebasso AM, Ryzhova M, Albrecht S, Jacob K, Wolter M, Ebinger M, Schuhmann MU, van Meter T, Fruhwald MC, Hauch H, Pekrun A, Radlwimmer B, Niehues T, von Komorowski G, Durken M, Kulozik AE, Madden J, Donson A, Foreman NK, Drissi R, Fouladi M, Scheurlen W, von Deimling A, Monoranu C, Roggendorf W, Herold-Mende C, Unterberg A, Kramm CM, Felsberg J, Hartmann C, Wiestler B, Wick W, Milde T, Witt O, Lindroth AM, Schwartzentruber J, Faury D, Fleming A, Zakrzewska M, Liberski PP, Zakrzewski K, Hauser P, Garami M, Klekner A, Bognar L, Morrissy S, Cavalli F, Taylor MD, van Sluis P, Koster J, Versteeg R, Volckmann R, Mikkelsen T, Aldape K, Reifenberger G, Collins VP, Majewski J, Korshunov A, Lichter P, Plass C, Jabado N, Pfister SM (2012) Hotspot mutations in H3F3A and IDH1 define distinct epigenetic and biological subgroups of glioblastoma. Cancer Cell 22 425 – 37. [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 12.Nagaraja S, Quezada MA, Gillespie SM, Arzt M, Lennon JJ, Woo PJ, Hovestadt V, Kambhampati M, Filbin MG, Suva ML, Nazarian J, Monje M (2019) Histone Variant and Cell Context Determine H3K27M Reprogramming of the Enhancer Landscape and Oncogenic State. Mol Cell 76:965–980e12 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Bressan RB, Southgate B, Ferguson KM, Blin C, Grant V, Alfazema N, Wills JC, Marques-Torrejon MA, Morrison GM, Ashmore J, Robertson F, Williams CAC, Bradley L, von Kriegsheim A, Anderson RA, Tomlinson SR, Pollard SM (2021) Regional identity of human neural stem cells determines oncogenic responses to histone H3.3 mutants. Cell Stem Cell 28:877–893e9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Haase S, Nunez FM, Gauss JC, Thompson S, Brumley E, Lowenstein P, Castro MG (2020) Hemispherical Pediatric High-Grade Glioma: Molecular Basis and Therapeutic Opportunities. Int J Mol Sci 21 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 15.Williams EA, Brastianos PK, Wakimoto H, Zolal A, Filbin MG, Cahill DP, Santagata S, Juratli TA (2023) A comprehensive genomic study of 390 H3F3A-mutant pediatric and adult diffuse high-grade gliomas, CNS WHO grade 4. Acta Neuropathol 146:515–525 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Bonada M, Pittarello M, De Fazio E, Gans A, Alimonti P, Slika H, Legnani F, Di Meco F, Tyler B (2024) Pediatric Hemispheric High-Grade Gliomas and H3.3-G34 Mutation: A Review of the Literature on Biological Features and New Therapeutic Strategies. Genes (Basel) 15 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 17.Chen CCL, Deshmukh S, Jessa S, Hadjadj D, Lisi V, Andrade AF, Faury D, Jawhar W, Dali R, Suzuki H, Pathania M, Dubois DAF, Woodward E, Hebert S, Coutelier M, Karamchandani J, Albrecht S, Brandner S, De Jay N, Gayden T, Bajic A, Harutyunyan AS, Marchione DM, Mikael LG, Juretic N, Zeinieh M, Russo C, Maestro N, Bassenden AV, Hauser P, Virga J, Bognar L, Klekner A, Zapotocky M, Vicha A, Krskova L, Vanova K, Zamecnik J, Sumerauer D, Ekert PG, Ziegler DS, Ellezam B, Filbin MG, Blanchette M, Hansford JR, Khuong-Quang DA, Berghuis AM, Weil AG, Garcia BA, Garzia L, Mack SC, Beroukhim R, Ligon KL, Taylor MD, Bandopadhayay P, Kramm C, Pfister SM, Korshunov A, D. Sturm, D.T.W., Jones P, Salomoni CL, Kleinman, Jabado N (2020) Histone H3.3G34-Mutant Interneuron Progenitors Co-opt PDGFRA for Gliomagenesis. Cell 183 1617–1633 e22 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 18.Mackay A, Burford A, Carvalho D, Izquierdo E, Fazal-Salom J, Taylor KR, Bjerke L, Clarke M, Vinci M, Nandhabalan M, Temelso S, Popov S, Molinari V, Raman P, Waanders AJ, Han HJ, Gupta S, Marshall L, Zacharoulis S, Vaidya S, Mandeville HC, Bridges LR, Martin AJ, Al-Sarraj S, Chandler C, Ng HK, Li X, Mu K, Trabelsi S, Brahim DH, Kisljakov AN, Konovalov DM, Moore AS, Carcaboso AM, Sunol M, de Torres C, Cruz O, Mora J, Shats LI, Stavale JN, Bidinotto LT, Reis RM, Entz-Werle N, Farrell M, Cryan J, Crimmins D, Caird J, Pears J, Monje M, Debily MA, Castel D, Grill J, Hawkins C, Nikbakht H, Jabado N, Baker SJ, Pfister SM, Jones DTW, Fouladi M, von Bueren AO, Baudis M, Resnick A, Jones C (2017) Integrated Molecular Meta-Analysis of 1,000 Pediatric High-Grade and Diffuse Intrinsic Pontine Glioma. Cancer Cell 32:520–537e5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Crowell C, Zhu Z, Li Y, Varela ML, Ostrom Q, Cimino PJ, Patel SH, Baker SJ, Bettegowda C, Noushmehr H, Kleinman CL, Canty L, Cruzeiro GAV, Nellan A, Becher O, Davidson TB, Hambardzumyan D, Green A, Thorne R, Wilson K, Theeler B, Gregory J, Mathen P, Biassou N, McThenia S, Erker C, Galvin R, Soldatos A, Lowenstein PR, Castro MG, Jackson S (2025) A review of diffuse hemispheric glioma, H3 G34-mutant disease development, DNA repair, microenvironment, and treatments on the horizon. NPJ Precis Oncol 9:283 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Hambardzumyan D, Amankulor NM, Helmy KY, Becher OJ, Holland EC (2009) Modeling Adult Gliomas Using RCAS/t-va Technology. Transl Oncol 2:89–95 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Misuraca KL, Barton KL, Chung A, Diaz AK, Conway SJ, Corcoran DL, Baker SJ, Becher OJ (2014) Pax3 expression enhances PDGF-B-induced brainstem gliomagenesis and characterizes a subset of brainstem glioma. Acta Neuropathol Commun 2:134 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Liu I, Alencastro Veiga Cruzeiro G, Bjerke L, Rogers RF, Grabovska Y, Beck A, Mackay A, Barron T, Hack OA, Quezada MA, Molinari V, Shaw ML, Perez-Somarriba M, Temelso S, Raynaud F, Ruddle R, Panditharatna E, Englinger B, Mire HM, Jiang L, Nascimento A, LaBelle J, Haase R, Rozowsky J, Neyazi S, Baumgartner AC, Castellani S, Hoffman SE, Cameron A, Morrow M, Nguyen QD, Pericoli G, Madlener S, Mayr L, Dorfer C, Geyeregger R, Rota C, Ricken G, Ligon KL, Alexandrescu S, Cartaxo RT, Lau B, Uphadhyaya S, Koschmann C, Braun E, Danan-Gotthold M, Hu L, Siletti K, Sundstrom E, Hodge R, Lein E, Agnihotri S, Eisenstat DD, Stapleton S, King A, Bleil C, Mastronuzzi A, Cole KA, Waanders AJ, Montero Carcaboso A, Schuller U, Hargrave D, Vinci M, Carceller F, Haberler C, Slavc I, Linnarsson S, Gojo J, Monje M, Jones C, Filbin MG (2024) GABAergic neuronal lineage development determines clinically actionable targets in diffuse hemispheric glioma, H3G34-mutant. Cancer Cell 42 1528–1548 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 23.Pozniak CD, Langseth AJ, Dijkgraaf GJ, Choe Y, Werb Z, Pleasure SJ (2010) Sox10 directs neural stem cells toward the oligodendrocyte lineage by decreasing Suppressor of Fused expression. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 107:21795–21800 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Weng Q, Wang J, Wang J, He D, Cheng Z, Zhang F, Verma R, Xu L, Dong X, Liao Y, He X, Potter A, Zhang L, Zhao C, Xin M, Zhou Q, Aronow BJ, Blackshear PJ, Rich JN, He Q, Zhou W, Suva ML, Waclaw RR, Potter SS, Yu G, Lu QR (2019) Single-Cell Transcriptomics Uncovers Glial Progenitor Diversity and Cell Fate Determinants during Development and Gliomagenesis. Cell Stem Cell 24:707–723e8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Suva ML, Rheinbay E, Gillespie SM, Patel AP, Wakimoto H, Rabkin SD, Riggi N, Chi AS, Cahill DP, Nahed BV, Curry WT, Martuza RL, Rivera MN, Rossetti N, Kasif S, Beik S, Kadri S, Tirosh I, Wortman I, Shalek AK, Rozenblatt-Rosen O, Regev A, Louis DN, Bernstein BE (2014) Reconstructing and reprogramming the tumor-propagating potential of glioblastoma stem-like cells. Cell 157 580 – 94. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 26.Pei Z, Wang B, Chen G, Nagao M, Nakafuku M, Campbell K (2011) Homeobox genes Gsx1 and Gsx2 differentially regulate telencephalic progenitor maturation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 108:1675–1680 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Shi Y, Wang M, Mi D, Lu T, Wang B, Dong H, Zhong S, Chen Y, Sun L, Zhou X, Ma Q, Liu Z, Wang W, Zhang J, Wu Q, Marin O, Wang X (2021) Mouse and human share conserved transcriptional programs for interneuron development. Science 374:eabj6641 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Tsuboi A, Yoshihara S (2025) Arx revisited: involved in the development of GABAergic interneurons. Front Cell Dev Biol 13:1563515 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Antonios JP, Soto H, Everson RG, Orpilla J, Moughon D, Shin N, Sedighim S, Yong WH, Li G, Cloughesy TF, Liau LM, Prins RM (2016) PD-1 blockade enhances the vaccination-induced immune response in glioma. JCI Insight 1:e87059 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Revkov E, Kulshrestha T, Sung KW, Skanderup AJ (2023) PUREE: accurate pan-cancer tumor purity estimation from gene expression data. Commun Biol 6:394 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.He Y, Karsdal MA, Type IX (2016) Collagen. In: Karsdal MA (ed) Biochemistry of Collagens, Laminins and Elastin. Elsevier, pp 67–71
  • 32.Ishikawa Y, Bachinger HP (2013) A molecular ensemble in the rER for procollagen maturation. Biochim Biophys Acta 1833:2479–2491 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Kudo A, Kii I (2018) Periostin function in communication with extracellular matrices. J Cell Commun Signal 12:301–308 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Cal S, Lopez-Otin C (2015) ADAMTS proteases and cancer. Matrix Biol 44–46 77–85 [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 35.Kim YH, O’Neill HM, Whitehead JP (2015) Carboxypeptidase X-1 (CPX-1) is a secreted collagen-binding glycoprotein. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 468:894–899 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Ang P, Venugopal C, Singh SK, Escudero L (2025) Using GlioVis to Explore, Analyze, and Visualize Brain Tumor Multi-Omics Datasets. Methods Mol Biol 2944:239–256 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Subramanian A, Tamayo P, Mootha VK, Mukherjee S, Ebert BL, Gillette MA, Paulovich A, Pomeroy SL, Golub TR, Lander ES, Mesirov JP (2005) Gene set enrichment analysis: a knowledge-based approach for interpreting genome-wide expression profiles. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 102:15545–15550 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Liau LM, Ashkan K, Brem S, Campian JL, Trusheim JE, Iwamoto FM, Tran DD, Ansstas G, Cobbs CS, Heth JA, Salacz ME, D’Andre S, Aiken RD, Moshel YA, Nam JY, Pillainayagam CP, Wagner SA, Walter KA, Chaudhary R, Goldlust SA, Lee IY, Bota DA, Elinzano H, Grewal J, Lillehei K, Mikkelsen T, Walbert T, Abram S, Brenner AJ, Ewend MG, Khagi S, Lovick DS, Portnow J, Kim L, Loudon WG, Martinez NL, Thompson RC, Avigan DE, Fink KL, Geoffroy FJ, Giglio P, Gligich O, Krex D, Lindhorst SM, Lutzky J, Meisel HJ, Nadji-Ohl M, Sanchin L, Sloan A, Taylor LP, Wu JK, Dunbar EM, Etame AB, Kesari S, Mathieu D, Piccioni DE, Baskin DS, Lacroix M, May SA, New PZ, Pluard TJ, Toms SA, Tse V, Peak S, Villano JL, Battiste JD, Mulholland PJ, Pearlman ML, Petrecca K, Schulder M, Prins RM, Boynton AL, Bosch ML (2023) Association of Autologous Tumor Lysate-Loaded Dendritic Cell Vaccination With Extension of Survival Among Patients With Newly Diagnosed and Recurrent Glioblastoma: A Phase 3 Prospective Externally Controlled Cohort Trial. JAMA Oncol 9:112–121 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Mackay A, Burford A, Molinari V, Jones DTW, Izquierdo E, Brouwer-Visser J, Giangaspero F, Haberler C, Pietsch T, Jacques TS, Figarella-Branger D, Rodriguez D, Morgan PS, Raman P, Waanders AJ, Resnick AC, Massimino M, Garre ML, Smith H, Capper D, Pfister SM, Wurdinger T, Tam R, Garcia J, Thakur MD, Vassal G, Grill J, Jaspan T, Varlet P, Jones C (2018) Molecular, Pathological, Radiological, and Immune Profiling of Non-brainstem Pediatric High-Grade Glioma from the HERBY Phase II Randomized Trial. Cancer Cell 33:829–842e5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Mueller S, Taitt JM, Villanueva-Meyer JE, Bonner ER, Nejo T, Lulla RR, Goldman S, Banerjee A, Chi SN, Whipple NS, Crawford JR, Gauvain K, Nazemi KJ, Watchmaker PB, Almeida ND, Okada K, Salazar AM, Gilbert RD, Nazarian J, Molinaro AM, Butterfield LH, Prados MD, Okada H (2020) Mass cytometry detects H3.3K27M-specific vaccine responses in diffuse midline glioma. J Clin Invest 130:6325–6337 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Wang SS, Pandey K, Watson KA, Abbott RC, Mifsud NA, Gracey FM, Ramarathinam SH, Cross RS, Purcell AW, Jenkins MR (2023) Endogenous H3.3K27M derived peptide restricted to HLA-A *02:01 is insufficient for immune-targeting in diffuse midline glioma. Mol Ther Oncolytics 30:167–180 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Grassl N, Poschke I, Lindner K, Bunse L, Mildenberger I, Boschert T, Jahne K, Green EW, Hulsmeyer I, Junger S, Kessler T, Suwala AK, Eisele P, Breckwoldt MO, Vajkoczy P, Grauer OM, Herrlinger U, Tonn JC, Denk M, Sahm F, Bendszus M, von Deimling A, Winkler F, Wick W, Platten M, Sahm K (2023) A H3K27M-targeted vaccine in adults with diffuse midline glioma. Nat Med 29:2586–2592 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Ross JL, Chen Z, Herting CJ, Grabovska Y, Szulzewsky F, Puigdelloses M, Monterroza L, Switchenko J, Wadhwani NR, Cimino PJ, Mackay A, Jones C, Read RD, MacDonald TJ, Schniederjan M, Becher OJ, Hambardzumyan D (2021) Platelet-derived growth factor beta is a potent inflammatory driver in paediatric high-grade glioma. Brain 144:53–69 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Marshall CAG, Suzuki SO, Goldman JE (2003) Gliogenic and neurogenic progenitors of the subventricular zone: who are they, where did they come from, and where are they going? Glia 43:52–61 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Maruhashi T, Kii I, Saito M, Kudo A (2010) Interaction between periostin and BMP-1 promotes proteolytic activation of lysyl oxidase. J Biol Chem 285:13294–13303 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Zhou W, Ke SQ, Huang Z, Flavahan W, Fang X, Paul J, Wu L, Sloan AE, McLendon RE, Li X, Rich JN, Bao S (2015) Periostin secreted by glioblastoma stem cells recruits M2 tumour-associated macrophages and promotes malignant growth. Nat Cell Biol 17:170–182 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Malanchi I, Santamaria-Martinez A, Susanto E, Peng H, Lehr HA, Delaloye JF, Huelsken J (2011) Interactions between cancer stem cells and their niche govern metastatic colonization. Nature 481:85–89 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Shang Y, Liang Y, Zhang B, Wu W, Peng Y, Wang J, Zhang M, Niu C (2025) Periostin-mediated activation of NF-kappaB signaling promotes tumor progression and chemoresistance in glioblastoma. Sci Rep 15:13955 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Zhu M, Saxton RE, Ramos L, Chang DD, Karlan BY, Gasson JC, Slamon DJ (2011) Neutralizing monoclonal antibody to periostin inhibits ovarian tumor growth and metastasis. Mol Cancer Ther 10:1500–1508 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Kyutoku M, Taniyama Y, Katsuragi N, Shimizu H, Kunugiza Y, Iekushi K, Koibuchi N, Sanada F, Oshita Y, Morishita R (2011) Role of periostin in cancer progression and metastasis: inhibition of breast cancer progression and metastasis by anti-periostin antibody in a murine model. Int J Mol Med 28:181–186 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Lee YJ, Kim IS, Park SA, Kim Y, Lee JE, Noh DY, Kim KT, Ryu SH, Suh PG (2013) Periostin-binding DNA aptamer inhibits breast cancer growth and metastasis. Mol Ther 21:1004–1013 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Meel MH, Sewing ACP, Waranecki P, Metselaar DS, Wedekind LE, Koster J, van Vuurden DG, Kaspers GJL, Hulleman E (2017) Culture methods of diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma cells determine response to targeted therapies. Exp Cell Res 360:397–403 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Dobin A, Davis CA, Schlesinger F, Drenkow J, Zaleski C, Jha S, Batut P, Chaisson M, Gingeras TR (2013) STAR: ultrafast universal RNA-seq aligner. Bioinformatics 29:15–21 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Robinson MD, Oshlack A (2010) A scaling normalization method for differential expression analysis of RNA-seq data. Genome Biol 11:R25 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Love MI, Huber W, Anders S (2014) Moderated estimation of fold change and dispersion for RNA-seq data with DESeq2. Genome Biol 15:550 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Hanzelmann S, Castelo R, Guinney J (2013) GSVA: gene set variation analysis for microarray and RNA-seq data. BMC Bioinformatics 14:7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Freeman TC, Horsewell S, Patir A, Harling-Lee J, Regan T, Shih BB, Prendergast J, Hume DA, Angus T (2022) Graphia: A platform for the graph-based visualisation and analysis of high dimensional data. PLoS Comput Biol 18:e1010310 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Fang Z, Liu X, Peltz G (2023) GSEApy: a comprehensive package for performing gene set enrichment analysis in Python. Bioinformatics 39 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary Material 1 (43.6KB, pdf)
Supplementary Material 3 (52.7KB, pdf)
Supplementary Material 5 (1.7MB, xlsx)

Data Availability Statement

All data supporting the findings of this study are available within the paper and its Supplementary Information.


Articles from Journal of Neuro-Oncology are provided here courtesy of Springer

RESOURCES