Skip to main content
Frontiers in Neuroscience logoLink to Frontiers in Neuroscience
. 2026 Mar 20;20:1787955. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2026.1787955

Postnatal maturation of the basolateral and paralaminar amygdala in rodents: implications for social–emotional development

David Saxon 1, Joshua G Corbin 2,*
PMCID: PMC13047059  PMID: 41938699

Abstract

Across vertebrate species, the amygdala is a central node of the social brain network, an interconnected set of nuclei for regulation of innate and learned social and emotional behaviors. The amygdala undergoes significant structural and functional changes from juvenile to adult stages of life, driving the emergence of complex social and emotional behaviors. Focusing primarily on rodent animal models, in this review we describe the dramatic changes that unfold from juvenile stages to young adulthood in two amygdala nuclei that undergo significant post-natal growth, the basolateral amygdala (BLA) and paralaminar nucleus (PL). Interestingly, while both the BLA and PL mature during post-natal stages, neurons in the BLA mature earlier than the PL. The differing maturational rates along with differences in input/output connectivity of these nuclei indicate that they play complementary roles in the emergence of amygdala-driven social–emotional behaviors, such as responses to fear, social hierarchical behaviors and responses to novel cues. The post-natal development of the BLA, and likely the PL, which is less well studied, is highly shaped by the environment, particularly the quality of early caregiving. Understanding the developmental processes that unfold during this critical period of life and their sensitivity to environmental disruption will be key to developing biologically informed interventional strategies for a host of human disorders characterized by neuro-atypical social–emotional behaviors.

Keywords: adolescent brain development, basolateral amygdala, paralaminar amygdala, postnatal maturation, social–emotional development

Introduction

The amygdala is a key brain region involved in integrating environmental stimuli for appropriate behavioral outputs related to social navigation and avoidance of threats. Importantly, the amygdala undergoes remarkable post-natal growth which is critical for the behavioral transition from the juvenile period to adulthood. The amygdala comprises approximately 10–12 distinct nuclei that perform different roles in social–emotional behavior (Aerts and Seuntjens, 2021; Adolphs, 2010; Newman, 1999; Phelps and LeDoux, 2005). Of these nuclei, the basolateral (BLA) and paralaminar (PL) amygdala nuclei appear to uniquely display structural and functional changes between juvenile and adult ages. Anatomically, in rodents these nuclei abut each other in the ventral telencephalon (Figure 1), yet are distinct in their neuronal composition, connectivity and as we describe in detail below, their maturational trajectories. While the postnatal development of the BLA is well-characterized in rodents, the PL has thus far been almost exclusively studied in larger mammals, including humans, non-human primates, cats, sheep, and tree shrews (Avino et al., 2018; Bernier et al., 2002; Braak and Braak, 1983; Caroline Crosby and Humphrey, 1939; Chareyron et al., 2016; de Campo et al., 2017; Page et al., 2022; Piumatti et al., 2018; Sah et al., 2003; Sorrells et al., 2019; Yachnis et al., 2000). However, the recent identification of the PL in the mouse has opened the opportunity for mechanistic studies in a genetically tractable model, as well as comparisons to the BLA (Alderman et al., 2024). In this review, we describe the maturational trajectories of the rodent BLA and PL from juvenile to adult ages, focusing on hallmark changes in molecular expression, morphology, electrophysiological properties, and synaptic connectivity. We conclude by discussing how these developmental processes are affected by external stressors in the rodent model resulting in atypical behaviors.

Figure 1.

Coronal brain section stained purple is shown with a red box highlighting the amygdala region. A schematic close-up outlines specific amygdala subregions: basolateral amygdala (BLA) in orange, centromedial (CeA), medial (MeA), and cortical (CoA) subregions, with the prelimbic cortex (PL) indicated in pink.

Anatomy the major amygdala showing major nuclei and highlighting the location of the basolateral (BLA, light brown) and paralaminar (PL, pink) nuclei in the mouse in coronal view. Like in larger mammals, the PL is adjacent to the BLA. Abbreviations: CeA central amygdala, CoA cortical amygdala, MeA medial amygdala.

In mammals, brain development begins gestationally and continues into post-natal life, with major changes in growth and connectivity of neurons into early adulthood. The post-natal period from birth to adulthood is divided into infancy, juvenile and adolescent stages. In humans the juvenile period is from about age two until ten with adolescence defined as the period from the onset of sexual maturation, which varies from individual to individual, from about age ten until age nineteen (Bell, 2018). In rodents, the juvenile period is approximately from weaning at three weeks until about four weeks, with adolescence occurring between about the fourth to the sixth postnatal week (Schneider, 2013) (Figure 2). However, in both rodents and humans, the onset and completion of adolescence are not defined by clear timepoints. In addition to the onset and progression of puberty adolescence is characterized by numerous and dramatic behavioral changes occurring before and after the pubertal window. These include increased social independence, pursuit of novelty and risk, the enhanced ability to navigate a complex social environment, and maturation of emotional processing (Juraska and Willing, 2017; Schneider, 2013; Spear, 2000). Across mammalian species, these changes support a shift from caregiver bonding and exploratory social behaviors in juvenile ages, to complex affiliative, aversive, and defensive behaviors in adolescence and adulthood (Ferrara and Opendak, 2023; Harda et al., 2025; Harlow and Zimmermann, 1959; Lloyd et al., 2023; Meaney and Stewart, 1981; Panksepp, 1981; Sullivan et al., 2000). This transition is linked to the changing needs of the individual for survival, which at early ages are tied to the primary caregiver, but later require independent detection of resources and threats.

Figure 2.

Developmental timeline diagram comparing mouse and rat brain maturation stages, including gestation, infant, juvenile, adolescent, and adult periods, with annotations for neural maturation events and early life stress (ELS) impacts in BLA and PL regions; bottom illustration contrasts immature and mature neuron morphology and functional attributes.

Timelines and benchmarks of BLA and PL maturation in mouse and rat. (A) Timelines of the major changes during maturation of BLA and PL principal neurons, and the consequences of early life stress (ELS) on BLA maturation. (B) Major characteristics of neuronal maturation. Immature neurons display a simple, migratory morphology and lack elaborated dendrites and elongated axons. Mature neurons have large cell bodies with complex dendritic trees and ramified axons, display abundant synaptic connectivity, no longer express migratory proteins, and exhibit electrophysiological properties that promote efficient input–output coding. Created in https://BioRender.com.

The overwhelming majority of neurons in the mammalian brain are born during gestation, after which they undergo several developmental steps, culminating in reaching their full maturational state upon completion of adolescence (Figure 2). Neuronal maturation is defined as the process whereby a postmitotic neuron undergoes changes in molecular, morphological, electrophysiological, and synaptic connectivity, which subsequently remain relatively stable, equipping the neuron to reliably process stimuli and drive behaviors within dedicated circuits. Early to mid-gestation is characterized by extensive proliferation of neural precursors. Once neurons exit the cell cycle, they undergo both long- and short-range migration to their final destinations. The period of late gestation to early infancy is characterized by the elaboration of dendrites and axons, myelination and the formation of nascent synapses (Zeiss, 2021). Juvenile and adolescent periods are characterized by modeling and strengthening of neuronal connectivity, processes of which underly behavioral transitions. Each of these steps of development are identified by distinct molecular, morphological and electrophysiological readouts (Figure 2). For example, migrating immature postmitotic neurons in the developing brain are defined by their expression of doublecortin (Dcx) and polysialyated cell adhesion molecule (Psa-Ncam) (Gleeson et al., 1999; Ono et al., 1994), and at this stage of their lifecycle lack axons and dendrites and are generally devoid of synaptic connectivity. Once settling in their final locations, neurons undergo extensive changes in morphological complexity, including a growth in soma size and the ramification of dendritic trees (Hoshiba et al., 2016; Wise et al., 1979). Along with these morphological changes, there is a reduction in membrane excitability and an increase in the speed, amplitude, and frequency of action potentials, which result in more effective input–output coding (Gao and Ziskind-Conhaim, 1998; Nikitin et al., 2017; Schulz, 2006). Finally, the establishment and refinement of synaptic connections is seen from both local interneurons and long-range input from projection neurons from other brain regions, which can be observed at the structural and electrophysiological levels as stronger and more frequent inhibitory and excitatory post synaptic currents. These connections then undergo pruning and reorganization as a neuron adopts more specific roles in maturing circuits (Harrill et al., 2015; Ichikawa et al., 1993).

Neuronal maturation in the postnatal BLA and PL

Principal output neurons in both the BLA and PL are excitatory (Alderman et al., 2024; McDonald, 2020). However, the trajectory of neuronal maturation differs between the two nuclei (Figure 2). Electrophysiological and morphological maturation in the BLA occurs much earlier than the PL, primarily during the first postnatal month. From P7-28, BLA neurons in the rat increase in soma size and dendritic complexity, and display a reduction in membrane excitability driven by decreased input resistance and time constant (Ehrlich et al., 2012; Ryan et al., 2016). During this same window, action potentials become faster, maximum firing frequency increases, and neurons begin to exhibit burst firing. From P28 to later ages (>P35) in the rat, BLA principal neurons do not show significant electrophysiological changes, and are therefore considered physiologically mature (Ehrlich et al., 2012). Interestingly, during this stage there is an emergence of sex differences in electrophysiological and morphological properties; action potentials become slightly smaller and faster in males, with increased excitability at adulthood compared to females, while females undergo a greater change in spine morphology (Guily et al., 2022).

Unlike BLA neurons, which are largely mature by the end of the first postnatal month, PL neurons are still in early stages of maturation through juvenile ages. In the mouse, from P7-28, expression of Dcx is approximately 100-fold more dense in the PL than in the BLA; though Dcx expression is not specific to neurons, the majority (65–80%) of Dcx + cells in the PL co-express the neuronal marker NeuN (Alderman et al., 2024). From P21-28, a substantial number of mouse PL neurons continue to express Dcx. These Dcx-expressing neurons show interesting heterogeneity: some feature a small soma, lack dendrites, and exhibit immature electrophysiological features including high input resistance and slow, low-amplitude action potentials, while others show more developed dendritic trees and spike properties despite retaining Dcx expression. Mouse PL neurons that no longer express Dcx at P21-28 display more developed morphological and electrophysiological profiles, such as decreased excitability, faster and higher amplitude action potential spikes, and hallmark features of synaptic connectivity at both the structural and electrophysiological levels (Alderman et al., 2024). From juvenile ages (P21-28) to early adulthood (P60), majority of mouse PL neurons remain in the PL; no neurons are lost to cell death, but interestingly a small population migrates to the nearby ventral endopiriform (VEn) and a trace number (<10%) maintain Dcx expression into adulthood (Alderman et al., 2024). From P59-78, mouse PL neurons express much lower membrane excitability, greater amplitude, speed, and frequency of action potentials, highly complex dendritic trees, and increased input/output connectivity compared to P21-28 (Alderman et al., 2024; Saxon et al., 2024).

Therefore, maturation of molecular, morphological and electrophysiological properties is more protracted in the PL compared to the BLA, continuing through adolescence. Upon reaching maturity, the PL and BLA both exhibit electrophysiological heterogeneity, containing projection neurons with bursting and delayed-spiking phenotypes (Rainnie et al., 1993; Sah et al., 2003; Saxon et al., 2024; Washburn and Moises, 1992), which is a broadly conserved feature of excitatory projection neurons across the brain (Agmon and Connors, 1992; Chen et al., 2022; Connors and Gutnick, 1990; Kasper et al., 1994; Sun et al., 2013; Suzuki and Bekkers, 2006). Importantly, however, mature PL neurons are distinct from their BLA counterparts, exhibiting distinctive electrophysiological and morphological properties (Ehrlich et al., 2012; Guily et al., 2022; Saxon et al., 2024), as well as different connectivity (discussed below).

Changes in inputs to the BLA and PL

The BLA receives major inputs from prefrontal, insular, visual, auditory and olfactory cortices, the hippocampus, and thalamus, as well as from other amygdala nuclei (Hintiryan et al., 2021; McDonald, 2020, 1998). Interestingly, the number of postnatal changes in these BLA inputs is region-specific. From P7-19 in the rat BLA, inputs from the thalamus and substantia innominata are stable, and inputs from the auditory cortex increase only slightly. However, the greatest increase in inputs comes from the prefrontal cortex (PFC), where BLA- projecting neurons are almost absent at P7 but increase in number, density, and distribution from P9-19 (Bouwmeester et al., 2002). Alongside the significant increase in PFC neuronal projections to the BLA, afferent tracing from the PFC shows that the density of their fibers in the BLA increases starting as early as P10, spreading from the medial to lateral aspect and peaking at P30 (Arruda-Carvalho et al., 2017). This is coupled with electrophysiological strengthening of these PFC-BLA connections from P15-30 both presynaptically (decreased paired-pulse ratio) and postsynaptically (increased AMPA/NMDA ratio) (Arruda-Carvalho et al., 2017). Following this growth of input connectivity, PFC inputs are pruned: after P30, PFC fiber density in the BLA drops (Arruda-Carvalho et al., 2017), and the number of neurons projecting from the PFC decreases substantially from P45 to 90 (Cressman et al., 2010). Thus, postnatal maturation of the BLA is characterized by significant strengthening of inputs specifically from the PFC peaking at the beginning of adolescence, followed by synaptic pruning through adolescence. Parallel to these changes in long range input from the PFC to the BLA, there are changes in inhibitory inputs from local interneurons to the BLA. GABA responses in the rat BLA shift from depolarizing to hyperpolarizing around P21 (Ehrlich et al., 2013). This postnatal GABA shift, a critical event in the transition from spontaneous to sensory-driven synaptic plasticity (Peerboom and Wierenga, 2021; Toyoizumi et al., 2013), occurs later in the BLA than the neocortex and hippocampus, where it occurs before P14 (Rivera et al., 1999; Tyzio et al., 2007). Following this GABA shift, feedforward inhibition from the PFC increases dramatically from P21 to P30, and inhibitory signaling to BLA neurons continues strengthening through adolescence until adult ages (Arruda-Carvalho et al., 2017; Selleck et al., 2018).

In the mouse, inputs to the PL emanate from other amygdala nuclei, including the BLA and cortical amygdala, as well as from multiple regions of the olfactory, insular, piriform, and entorhinal cortices (Saxon et al., 2024). While some of these inputs overlap with the BLA, the PL is more closely connected with the main olfactory network. During juvenile ages (P21-28), immature Dcx-expressing PL neurons display sparse spontaneous synaptic activity, suggesting that inputs remain immature alongside other neuronal properties. In contrast, synaptic responses at adult ages (P59-78) are of higher frequency and amplitude, particularly in inhibitory synaptic currents which are nearly absent at P21-28 (Alderman et al., 2024; Saxon et al., 2024). This indicates that, like in the BLA, synaptic inputs are dynamic during postnatal PL development, with PL input connectivity maturing on a delayed timeline compared to BLA neurons. The delayed development of PL inputs during adolescence, as well as its connectivity with olfactory systems, suggests different roles for these nuclei in navigating the changing environment from juvenile ages through adolescence.

Postnatal changes in the amygdala support social and emotional development from juvenile ages to adulthood

In infancy, when maternal care is required for survival, innate preference for a caregiver is hard-wired (Harlow and Zimmermann, 1959; Hess, 1959). For example, newborn rodents are unable to detect danger: in the first postnatal week conditioned odors universally produce affiliative responses, even those that predict painful stimuli (Sullivan et al., 2000). As the BLA develops during the second postnatal week, it supports the emergence of fear conditioning (Camp and Rudy, 1988; Haroutunian and Campbell, 1979; Thompson et al., 2008). This coincides with locomotion in juvenile rodents, and may equip animals to better detect danger during bouts of independent exploration (Altman and Sudarshan, 1975; Bolles and Woods, 1964). Interestingly, at these ages the presence of the maternal caregiver suppresses fear conditioning, likely through reduced glucocorticoid activation of the BLA (Moriceau and Sullivan, 2006). Thus, in infancy the BLA facilitates the delicate balance between affiliation with a caregiver, which is critical immediately after birth, and the recognition of danger, which becomes important with increased independence at juvenile ages. Thus, as discussed below, deficient or low-quality maternal care during early infancy has lasting consequences both on the developing amygdala and social behaviors.

As rodents approach weaning age (~P21), efficient processing of novel cues, both social and non-social, is necessary for navigating an unpredictable environment free from a caregiver. At this age, the BLA enables the processing of novel affiliative and aversive cues, both with conspecifics as well as the broader environment. Fear conditioning behaviors become robust around P21-24, including trace fear conditioning and fear extinction (Barnet and Hunt, 2005; Burman et al., 2014; Kim and Richardson, 2008). The BLA is strongly activated during fear expression at this age (Deal et al., 2016), before synaptic pruning of PFC afferents and increased inhibitory activity develops during adolescence as discussed above (Arruda-Carvalho et al., 2017; Ehrlich et al., 2012; Selleck et al., 2018). Animals at weaning age also begin to display more complex social behaviors, including affiliative play and territorial behaviors (Meaney and Stewart, 1981; Panksepp, 1981), which continue to develop in adolescence and endow animals the ability to navigate their place in the social hierarchy (Burghardt, 2001; Panksepp, 1998). While the brain networks contributing to these social behaviors are widely distributed, both the PFC and BLA are implicated. The PFC may play a role in adequate discrimination of social partners and receptiveness to play-fighting during development (Bell et al., 2009; Pellis et al., 1992). The adolescent BLA, on the other hand, is necessary for social drive (Ferrara et al., 2021), and dopaminergic activity in the BLA modulates approach-avoidance decisions toward novel peers (Opendak et al., 2021).

Much less is known about the behavioral role of the PL. However, a recent study examined c-fos expression in the mouse PL in response to novel and predator odorants (Alderman et al., 2024). From juvenile ages (P25-27) to adulthood (P60-100), PL neurons acquired a responsiveness to novel non-predator odors. These results suggest that as PL neurons mature, they may acquire a role in processing salient non-threatening cues. This would contrast with the earlier maturing BLA, which is more dedicated to the needs of the animal for survival, changing from early care-giver dependence to discrimination of threatening cues as the animal becomes independent. However, mechanistic studies linking PL neuronal maturation to specific behaviors are still lacking, and the functional role of the PL remains an open question for future investigation.

Postnatal BLA and PL development is sensitive to altered environments

The postnatal development of the amygdala is greatly influenced by the social environment. During preweaning ages, the most well-known environmental factor is the quality of parental care. Cellular and circuit development of the BLA occurs before weaning, when rodent pups are almost entirely dependent on the mother for survival. Thus, even small variations in maternal care have lasting effects on BLA architecture. For example, in adult rats the density of GABA and benzodiazepine receptors in the BLA is predicted by the quality of maternal care received during infancy (Caldji et al., 2003, 1998). To test the effects of inadequate maternal care as a model of early life stress (ELS) in rodents, one widely used paradigm is the limitation of nesting available to the nursing dam. Mouse and rat pups raised in this limited nesting environment display abnormal behaviors into adolescence and adulthood, including anxiety and depressive-like behaviors, cognitive dysfunction and social deficits (Chen and Baram, 2016). Alongside these behavioral abnormalities, many changes in BLA structure and function are seen in this model. After a limited nesting environment from P1-9, male rats display increased BLA dendrite complexity and spine density by P20, followed by increased LTP and perineuronal net density at P22-28 (Guadagno et al., 2018b, 2020). Further, both male and female rats display reduced functional connectivity between the BLA and PFC into adulthood (P74-76), alongside impaired fear extinction (Guadagno et al., 2018a). Limited bedding from P2-21 increases anxiety behaviors and BLA activity from P21-68 during a stress-induced hyperphagia paradigm (Malter Cohen et al., 2013). Rats raised with limited bedding from P8-12 display reduced social interaction at P20 and P45, as well as depressive-like behavior at P45 in the forced swim test that is correlated with increased c-fos activity in the amygdala, including the basal and lateral nuclei, and rescued by chemical inhibition broadly targeting the amygdala (Raineki et al., 2012). Overall, inadequate maternal care produces changes in the BLA, characterized by increased neuronal sensitivity, enhanced synaptic plasticity, and altered connectivity with the PFC. These alterations emerge by weaning age, when fear conditioning and social behaviors are beginning to peak, and contributes to the social and emotional dysfunctions seen into adulthood.

In contrast, the effects of ELS on PL development are less well studied. However, to date a single study in primates suggests a dramatic effect. In this study, a week of maternal deprivation at one week or one month of age reduced the expression of the excitatory marker tbr1 in the PL at three months of age, suggesting a defect in gene expression, a decrease in the number of mature PL excitatory neurons or excessive excitatory activity (de Campo et al., 2017). This suggests that the postnatal development of the PL is closely shaped by, and subsequently influences, early social behaviors, presenting a testable hypothesis for future studies. Regardless of the exact role of the PL, the adolescent time frame of neuronal maturation makes it well placed to be susceptible to environmental insults during this critical phase, especially stress-inducing paradigms.

Discussion

The postnatal development of the amygdala is characterized by structural and functional transformations that coincide with the behavioral transition from juvenile ages to adulthood with these changes occurring primarily in the BLA and PL nuclei. In rodents, the BLA undergoes rapid maturation during juvenile ages, supporting the emergence of fear learning and early social behaviors. In parallel, the PL undergoes a different maturational trajectory characterized by neurons that are highly immature by the beginning of juvenile stages. Although less explored than the BLA, the PL potentially contributes to the refinement of the discrimination of novel cues during this period. The BLA is highly sensitive to environmental input, particularly the quality of early caregiving, with disruptions producing lasting circuit abnormalities and social–emotional behavioral disruptions in animal models. The PL is likely also sensitive to disrupted care environments, though further work is needed to evaluate this relationship. Future research into how the BLA and PL individually and collectively drive social–emotional changes from juvenile ages to adulthood and how these processes are disrupted in both environmental and genetic models of neurodevelopmental and behavioral disorders, will be essential for the prevention, evaluation, and treatment of a host of human conditions.

Funding Statement

The author(s) declared that financial support was received for this work and/or its publication. This work was supported by NIH RO1 MH128745, NIH R56 MH10714382 and the Florence Nesh Charitable Trust through the PNC Charitable Trusts Grant Review Committee (JGC) and NIH F30MH133305 (DS).

Footnotes

Edited by: Dhananjay Huilgol, Duke University, United States

Reviewed by: Navjot Kaur, Yale University, United States

Julie L. Fudge, University of Rochester Medical Center, United States

Author contributions

DS: Conceptualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. JGC: Writing – original draft, Conceptualization, Writing – review & editing.

Conflict of interest

The author(s) declared that this work was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Generative AI statement

The author(s) declared that Generative AI was not used in the creation of this manuscript.

Any alternative text (alt text) provided alongside figures in this article has been generated by Frontiers with the support of artificial intelligence and reasonable efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, including review by the authors wherever possible. If you identify any issues, please contact us.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

References

  1. Adolphs R. (2010). What does the amygdala contribute to social cognition? Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 1191, 42–61. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2010.05445.x, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Aerts T., Seuntjens E. (2021). Novel perspectives on the development of the amygdala in rodents. Front. Neuroanat. 15:786679. doi: 10.3389/fnana.2021.786679, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Agmon A., Connors B. W. (1992). Correlation between intrinsic firing patterns and thalamocortical synaptic responses of neurons in mouse barrel cortex. J. Neurosci. 12, 319–329. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.12-01-00319.1992, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Alderman P. J., Saxon D., Torrijos-Saiz L. I., Sharief M., Page C. E., Baroudi J. K., et al. (2024). Delayed maturation and migration of excitatory neurons in the juvenile mouse paralaminar amygdala. Neuron 112, 574–592.e10. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2023.11.010, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Altman J., Sudarshan K. (1975). Postnatal development of locomotion in the laboratory rat. Anim. Behav. 23, 896–920. doi: 10.1016/0003-3472(75)90114-1, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Arruda-Carvalho M., Wu W.-C., Cummings K. A., Clem R. L. (2017). Optogenetic examination of prefrontal-amygdala synaptic development. J. Neurosci. 37, 2976–2985. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3097-16.2017, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Avino T. A., Barger N., Vargas M. V., Carlson E. L., Amaral D. G., Bauman M. D., et al. (2018). Neuron numbers increase in the human amygdala from birth to adulthood, but not in autism. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 115, 3710–3715. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1801912115, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Barnet R. C., Hunt P. S. (2005). Trace and long-delay fear conditioning in the developing rat. Learn. Behav. 33, 437–443. doi: 10.3758/BF03193182, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Bell M. R. (2018). Comparing postnatal development of gonadal hormones and associated social behaviors in rats, mice, and humans. Endocrinology 159, 2596–2613. doi: 10.1210/en.2018-00220, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Bell H. C., McCaffrey D. R., Forgie M. L., Kolb B., Pellis S. M. (2009). The role of the medial prefrontal cortex in the play fighting of rats. Behav. Neurosci. 123, 1158–1168. doi: 10.1037/a0017617, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Bernier P. J., Bedard A., Vinet J., Levesque M., Parent A. (2002). Newly generated neurons in the amygdala and adjoining cortex of adult primates. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 99, 11464–11469. doi: 10.1073/pnas.172403999, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Bolles R. C., Woods P. J. (1964). The ontogeny of behaviour in the albino rat. Anim. Behav. 12, 427–441. doi: 10.1016/0003-3472(64)90062-4 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  13. Bouwmeester H., Smits K., Van Ree J. M. (2002). Neonatal development of projections to the basolateral amygdala from prefrontal and thalamic structures in rat. J. Comp. Neurol. 450, 241–255. doi: 10.1002/cne.10321, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Braak H., Braak E. (1983). Neuronal types in the basolateral amygdaloid nuclei of man. Brain Res. Bull. 11, 349–365. doi: 10.1016/0361-9230(83)90171-5, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Burghardt G. M. (2001). “Play: attributes and neural substrates,” in Developmental Psychobiology, Handbook of Behavioral Neurobiology, ed. Blass E. M. (Boston, MA: Springer US; ), 317–356. [Google Scholar]
  16. Burman M. A., Erickson K. J., Deal A. L., Jacobson R. E. (2014). Contextual and auditory fear conditioning continue to emerge during the periweaning period in rats. PLoS One 9:e100807. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0100807, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Caldji C., Diorio J., Meaney M. J. (2003). Variations in maternal care Alter GABAA receptor subunit expression in brain regions associated with fear. Neuropsychopharmacol 28, 1950–1959. doi: 10.1038/sj.npp.1300237, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Caldji C., Tannenbaum B., Sharma S., Francis D., Plotsky P. M., Meaney M. J. (1998). Maternal care during infancy regulates the development of neural systems mediating the expression of fearfulness in the rat. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 95, 5335–5340. doi: 10.1073/pnas.95.9.5335, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Camp L. L., Rudy J. W. (1988). Changes in the categorization of appetitive and aversive events during postnatal development of the rat. Dev. Psychobiol. 21, 25–42. doi: 10.1002/dev.420210103, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Caroline Crosby E., Humphrey T. (1939). Studies of the vertebrate telencephalon. I. The nuclear configuration of the olfactory and accessory olfactory formations and of the nucleus olfactorius anterior of certain reptiles, birds, and mammals. J. Comp. Neurol. 71, 121–213. doi: 10.1002/cne.900710108 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  21. Chareyron L. J., Amaral D. G., Lavenex P. (2016). Selective lesion of the hippocampus increases the differentiation of immature neurons in the monkey amygdala. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 113, 14420–14425. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1604288113, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Chen Y., Baram T. Z. (2016). Toward understanding how early-life stress reprograms cognitive and emotional brain networks. Neuropsychopharmacology 41, 197–206. doi: 10.1038/npp.2015.181, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Chen S., Xu H., Dong S., Xiao L. (2022). Morpho-electric properties and diversity of oxytocin neurons in paraventricular nucleus of hypothalamus in female and male mice. J. Neurosci. 42, 2885–2904. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2494-21.2022, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Connors B. W., Gutnick M. J. (1990). Intrinsic firing patterns of diverse neocortical neurons. Trends Neurosci. 13, 99–104. doi: 10.1016/0166-2236(90)90185-D, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Cressman V. L., Balaban J., Steinfeld S., Shemyakin A., Graham P., Parisot N., et al. (2010). Prefrontal cortical inputs to the basal amygdala undergo pruning during late adolescence in the rat. J. Comp. Neurol. 518, 2693–2709. doi: 10.1002/cne.22359, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. de Campo D. M., Cameron J. L., Miano J. M., Lewis D. A., Mirnics K., Fudge J. L. (2017). Maternal deprivation alters expression of neural maturation gene tbr1 in the amygdala paralaminar nucleus in infant female macaques: early maternal deprivation alters tbr1 expression. Dev. Psychobiol. 59, 235–249. doi: 10.1002/dev.21493, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Deal A. L., Erickson K. J., Shiers S. I., Burman M. A. (2016). Limbic system development underlies the emergence of classical fear conditioning during the third and fourth weeks of life in the rat. Behav. Neurosci. 130, 212–230. doi: 10.1037/bne0000130, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Ehrlich D. E., Ryan S. J., Hazra R., Guo J.-D., Rainnie D. G. (2013). Postnatal maturation of GABAergic transmission in the rat basolateral amygdala. J. Neurophysiol. 110, 926–941. doi: 10.1152/jn.01105.2012, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Ehrlich D. E., Ryan S. J., Rainnie D. G. (2012). Postnatal development of electrophysiological properties of principal neurons in the rat basolateral amygdala. J. Physiol. 590, 4819–4838. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.2012.237453, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Ferrara N. C., Opendak M. (2023). Amygdala circuit transitions supporting developmentally-appropriate social behavior. Neurobiol. Learn. Mem. 201:107762. doi: 10.1016/j.nlm.2023.107762, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Ferrara N. C., Trask S., Avonts B., Loh M. K., Padival M., Rosenkranz J. A. (2021). Developmental shifts in amygdala activity during a high social drive state. J. Neurosci. 41, 9308–9325. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1414-21.2021, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Gao B. X., Ziskind-Conhaim L. (1998). Development of ionic currents underlying changes in action potential waveforms in rat spinal motoneurons. J. Neurophysiol. 80, 3047–3061. doi: 10.1152/jn.1998.80.6.3047, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Gleeson J. G., Lin P. T., Flanagan L. A., Walsh C. A. (1999). Doublecortin is a microtubule-associated protein and is expressed widely by migrating neurons. Neuron 23, 257–271. doi: 10.1016/S0896-6273(00)80778-3, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Guadagno A., Kang M. S., Devenyi G. A., Mathieu A. P., Rosa-Neto P., Chakravarty M., et al. (2018a). Reduced resting-state functional connectivity of the basolateral amygdala to the medial prefrontal cortex in preweaning rats exposed to chronic early-life stress. Brain Struct. Funct. 223, 3711–3729. doi: 10.1007/s00429-018-1720-3, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Guadagno A., Verlezza S., Long H., Wong T. P., Walker C.-D. (2020). It is all in the right amygdala: increased synaptic plasticity and Perineuronal nets in male, but not female, juvenile rat pups after exposure to early-life stress. J. Neurosci. 40, 8276–8291. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1029-20.2020, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Guadagno A., Wong T. P., Walker C.-D. (2018b). Morphological and functional changes in the preweaning basolateral amygdala induced by early chronic stress associate with anxiety and fear behavior in adult male, but not female rats. Prog. Neuro-Psychopharmacol. Biol. Psychiatry 81, 25–37. doi: 10.1016/j.pnpbp.2017.09.025, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Guily P., Lassalle O., Chavis P., Manzoni O. J. (2022). Sex-specific divergent maturational trajectories in the postnatal rat basolateral amygdala. iScience 25:103815. doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2022.103815, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Harda Z., Klimczak M., Misiołek K., Chrószcz M., Szumiec Ł., Kaczmarczyk-Jarosz M., et al. (2025). Changes in social reward across adolescence in male mice. Sci. Rep. 16:1094. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-30755-2, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Harlow H. F., Zimmermann R. R. (1959). Affectional responses in the infant monkey; orphaned baby monkeys develop a strong and persistent attachment to inanimate surrogate mothers. Science 130, 421–432. doi: 10.1126/science.130.3373.421 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Haroutunian V., Campbell B. A. (1979). Emergence of interoceptive and Exteroceptive control of behavior in rats. Science 205, 927–929. doi: 10.1126/science.472715, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Harrill J. A., Chen H., Streifel K. M., Yang D., Mundy W. R., Lein P. J. (2015). Ontogeny of biochemical, morphological and functional parameters of synaptogenesis in primary cultures of rat hippocampal and cortical neurons. Mol. Brain 8:10. doi: 10.1186/s13041-015-0099-9, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Hess E. H. (1959). Imprinting, an effect of early experience, imprinting determines later social behavior in animals. Science 130, 133–141. doi: 10.1126/science.130.3368.133, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Hintiryan H., Bowman I., Johnson D. L., Korobkova L., Zhu M., Khanjani N., et al. (2021). Connectivity characterization of the mouse basolateral amygdalar complex. Nat. Commun. 12:2859. doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-22915-5, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Hoshiba Y., Toda T., Ebisu H., Wakimoto M., Yanagi S., Kawasaki H. (2016). Sox11 balances dendritic morphogenesis with neuronal migration in the developing cerebral cortex. J. Neurosci. 36, 5775–5784. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3250-15.2016, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Ichikawa M., Muramoto K., Kobayashi K., Kawahara M., Kuroda Y. (1993). Formation and maturation of synapses in primary cultures of rat cerebral cortical cells: an electron microscopic study. Neurosci. Res. 16, 95–103. doi: 10.1016/0168-0102(93)90076-3, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Juraska J. M., Willing J. (2017). Pubertal onset as a critical transition for neural development and cognition. Brain Res. 1654, 87–94. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2016.04.012, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Kasper E. M., Larkman A. U., Lübke J., Blakemore C. (1994). Pyramidal neurons in layer 5 of the rat visual cortex. I. Correlation among cell morphology, intrinsic electrophysiological properties, and axon targets: morphology and physiology of adult layer 5 pyramidal neurons. J. Comp. Neurol. 339, 459–474. doi: 10.1002/cne.903390402, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Kim J. H., Richardson R. (2008). The effect of temporary amygdala inactivation on extinction and Reextinction of fear in the developing rat: unlearning as a potential mechanism for extinction early in development. J. Neurosci. 28, 1282–1290. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4736-07.2008, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Lloyd A., Viding E., McKay R., Furl N. (2023). Understanding patch foraging strategies across development. Trends Cogn. Sci. 27, 1085–1098. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2023.07.004, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Malter Cohen M., Jing D., Yang R. R., Tottenham N., Lee F. S., Casey B. J. (2013). Early-life stress has persistent effects on amygdala function and development in mice and humans. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 110, 18274–18278. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1310163110, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. McDonald A. J. (1998). Cortical pathways to the mammalian amygdala. Prog. Neurobiol. 55, 257–332. doi: 10.1016/S0301-0082(98)00003-3, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. McDonald A. J. (2020). Functional neuroanatomy of the basolateral amygdala: neurons, neurotransmitters, and circuits. Handb. Behav. Neurosci. 26, 1–38. doi: 10.1016/b978-0-12-815134-1.00001-5, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Meaney M. J., Stewart J. (1981). A descriptive study of social development in the rat (Rattus norvegicus). Anim. Behav. 29, 34–45. doi: 10.1016/S0003-3472(81)80149-2 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  54. Moriceau S., Sullivan R. M. (2006). Maternal presence serves as a switch between learning fear and attraction in infancy. Nat. Neurosci. 9, 1004–1006. doi: 10.1038/nn1733, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Newman S. W. (1999). The medial extended amygdala in male reproductive behavior. A node in the mammalian social behavior network. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 877, 242–257. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1999.tb09271.x, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. Nikitin E. S., Bal N. V., Malyshev A., Ierusalimsky V. N., Spivak Y., Balaban P. M., et al. (2017). Encoding of high frequencies improves with maturation of action potential generation in cultured neocortical neurons. Front. Cell. Neurosci. 11:28. doi: 10.3389/fncel.2017.00028, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. Ono K., Tomasiewicz H., Magnuson T., Rutishauser U. (1994). N-CAM mutation inhibits tangential neuronal migration and is phenocopied by enzymatic removal of polysialic acid. Neuron 13, 595–609. doi: 10.1016/0896-6273(94)90028-0, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. Opendak M., Raineki C., Perry R. E., Rincó n-Corté s M., Song S. C., Zanca R. M., et al. (2021). Bidirectional control of infant rat social behavior via dopaminergic innervation of the basolateral amygdala. Neuron 109, 4018–4035.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2021.09.041, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  59. Page C. E., Biagiotti S. W., Alderman P. J., Sorrells S. F. (2022). Immature excitatory neurons in the amygdala come of age during puberty. Dev. Cogn. Neurosci. 56:101133. doi: 10.1016/j.dcn.2022.101133, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  60. Panksepp J. (1981). The ontogeny of play in rats. Dev. Psychobiol. 14, 327–332. doi: 10.1002/dev.420140405, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  61. Panksepp J. (1998). Affective Neuroscience: The Foundations of human and animal Emotions, Affective Neuroscience: The Foundations of human and animal Emotions. New York, NY: Oxford University Press. [Google Scholar]
  62. Peerboom C., Wierenga C. J. (2021). The postnatal GABA shift: a developmental perspective. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 124, 179–192. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2021.01.024, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  63. Pellis S. M., Pellis V. C., Whishaw I. Q. (1992). The role of the cortex in play fighting by rats: developmental and evolutionary implications. Brain Behav. Evol. 39, 270–284. doi: 10.1159/000114124, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  64. Phelps E. A., LeDoux J. E. (2005). Contributions of the amygdala to emotion processing: from animal models to human behavior. Neuron 48, 175–187. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2005.09.025, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  65. Piumatti M., Palazzo O., La Rosa C., Crociara P., Parolisi R., Luzzati F., et al. (2018). Non-newly generated, “immature” neurons in the sheep brain are not restricted to cerebral cortex. J. Neurosci. 38, 826–842. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1781-17.2017, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  66. Raineki C., Cortés M. R., Belnoue L., Sullivan R. M. (2012). Effects of early-life abuse differ across development: infant social behavior deficits are followed by adolescent depressive-like behaviors mediated by the amygdala. J. Neurosci. 32, 7758–7765. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5843-11.2012, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  67. Rainnie D. G., Asprodini E. K., Shinnick-Gallagher P. (1993). Intracellular recordings from morphologically identified neurons of the basolateral amygdala. J. Neurophysiol. 69, 1350–1362. doi: 10.1152/jn.1993.69.4.1350, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  68. Rivera C., Voipio J., Payne J. A., Ruusuvuori E., Lahtinen H., Lamsa K., et al. (1999). The K+/cl− co-transporter KCC2 renders GABA hyperpolarizing during neuronal maturation. Nature 397, 251–255. doi: 10.1038/16697, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  69. Ryan S. J., Ehrlich D. E., Rainnie D. G. (2016). Morphology and dendritic maturation of developing principal neurons in the rat basolateral amygdala. Brain Struct. Funct. 221, 839–854. doi: 10.1007/s00429-014-0939-x, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  70. Sah P., Faber E. S. L., Lopez De Armentia M., Power J. (2003). The Amygdaloid complex: anatomy and Physiology. Physiol. Rev. 83, 803–834. doi: 10.1152/physrev.00002.2003, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  71. Saxon D., Alderman P. J., Sorrells S. F., Vicini S., Corbin J. G. (2024). Neuronal subtypes and connectivity of the adult mouse Paralaminar amygdala. eNeuro 11, ENEURO.0119–ENEU24.2024. doi: 10.1523/ENEURO.0119-24.2024, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  72. Schneider M. (2013). Adolescence as a vulnerable period to alter rodent behavior. Cell Tissue Res. 354, 99–106. doi: 10.1007/s00441-013-1581-2, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  73. Schulz D. J. (2006). Plasticity and stability in neuronal output via changes in intrinsic excitability: it’s what’s inside that counts. J. Exp. Biol. 209, 4821–4827. doi: 10.1242/jeb.02567, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  74. Selleck R. A., Zhang W., Mercier H. D., Padival M., Rosenkranz J. A. (2018). Limited prefrontal cortical regulation over the basolateral amygdala in adolescent rats. Sci. Rep. 8:17171. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-35649-0, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  75. Sorrells S. F., Paredes M. F., Velmeshev D., Herranz-Pérez V., Sandoval K., Mayer S., et al. (2019). Immature excitatory neurons develop during adolescence in the human amygdala. Nat. Commun. 10:2748. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-10765-1, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  76. Spear L. P. (2000). The adolescent brain and age-related behavioral manifestations. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 24, 417–463. doi: 10.1016/S0149-7634(00)00014-2, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  77. Sullivan R. M., Landers M., Yeaman B., Wilson D. A. (2000). Good memories of bad events in infancy. Nature 407, 38–39. doi: 10.1038/35024156, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  78. Sun Y. J., Kim Y.-J., Ibrahim L. A., Tao H. W., Zhang L. I. (2013). Synaptic mechanisms underlying functional dichotomy between intrinsic-bursting and regular-spiking neurons in auditory cortical layer 5. J. Neurosci. 33, 5326–5339. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4810-12.2013, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  79. Suzuki N., Bekkers J. M. (2006). Neural coding by two classes of principal cells in the mouse piriform cortex. J. Neurosci. 26, 11938–11947. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3473-06.2006, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  80. Thompson J. V., Sullivan R. M., Wilson D. A. (2008). Developmental emergence of fear learning corresponds with changes in amygdala synaptic plasticity. Brain Res. 1200, 58–65. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2008.01.057, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  81. Toyoizumi T., Miyamoto H., Yazaki-Sugiyama Y., Atapour N., Hensch T. K., Miller K. D. (2013). A theory of the transition to critical period plasticity: inhibition selectively suppresses spontaneous activity. Neuron 80, 51–63. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2013.07.022, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  82. Tyzio R., Holmes G. L., Ben-Ari Y., Khazipov R. (2007). Timing of the developmental switch in GABAA mediated signaling from excitation to inhibition in CA3 rat hippocampus using gramicidin perforated patch and extracellular recordings. Epilepsia 48, 96–105. doi: 10.1111/j.1528-1167.2007.01295.x, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  83. Washburn M. S., Moises H. C. (1992). Electrophysiological and morphological properties of rat basolateral amygdaloid neurons in vitro. J. Neurosci. 12, 4066–4079. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.12-10-04066.1992, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  84. Wise S. P., Fleshman J. W., Jones E. G. (1979). Maturation of pyramidal cell form in relation to developing afferent and efferent connections of rat somatic sensory cortex. Neuroscience 4, 1275–1297. doi: 10.1016/0306-4522(79)90157-X, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  85. Yachnis A. T., Roper S. N., Love A., Fancey J. T., Muir D. (2000). Bcl-2 immunoreactive cells with immature neuronal phenotype exist in the nonepileptic adult human brain. J. Neuropathol. Exp. Neurol. 59, 113–119. doi: 10.1093/jnen/59.2.113, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  86. Zeiss C. J. (2021). Comparative milestones in rodent and human postnatal central nervous system development. Toxicol. Pathol. 49, 1368–1373. doi: 10.1177/01926233211046933, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Frontiers in Neuroscience are provided here courtesy of Frontiers Media SA

RESOURCES