Skip to main content
Frontiers in Microbiology logoLink to Frontiers in Microbiology
. 2026 Mar 20;17:1786817. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2026.1786817

Deciphering genotype and geography dependent microbiome composition and its role in disease suppression in Ashwagandha

Samadhan Yuvraj Bagul 1,*, Shreedevasena S 1, Parmeshwar Lal Saran 1, Ganesh Navnath Khadke 1, Manish Das 1
PMCID: PMC13047081  PMID: 41939697

Abstract

Ashwagandha, Withania somnifera (L.) Dunal is a perennial evergreen shrub widely used to treat mental health disorders and physical debility, and to enhance overall physiological function. Variations in genotype and geographic origin significantly influence rhizospheric microbial communities by altering soil physicochemical properties. This study applied shotgun metagenomic sequencing to investigate microbial community shifts in the rhizosphere of Nagori Ashwagandha (RN) from Rajasthan, Vallabh Ashwagandha-1 (GV) from Gujarat, and Nagori Ashwagandha from Rajasthan cultivated in Gujarat (GN). Fusarium wilt incidence was 67%, affecting the roots, which represent the most economically important part of ashwagandha. Taxonomic analysis identified Actinomycetota (46–60%) and Pseudomonadota (35–42%) as the predominant phyla, with Nocardioides (3.1–8.8%), Streptomyces (4.5–6.5%), and Bradyrhizobium (1–1.6%) as dominant genera across all groups in metagenomic analysis. Alpha-diversity analysis revealed higher species richness and Simpson's index in the GV group compared to the GN and RN groups. Beta-diversity assessment using Bray–Curtis distances showed partial clustering of GN and RN relative to GV in principal coordinate analysis and hierarchical dendrograms. Functional profiling based on KEGG annotation indicated that core metabolic and cellular pathways predominated across all genotypes, with no significant differences in Tier 1 and Tier 2 functional categories. To our knowledge, this represents the first shotgun metagenomic analysis of ashwagandha. Culturomics analysis yielded seventeen isolates from two rhizospheric locations; among these, Bacillus subtilis DMA1 exhibited the highest mycelial inhibition against Fusarium solani (64%), with a germination rate of 98%, root length of 2.1 cm, shoot length of 1.3 cm, seed vigor index of 333.2, and maximum fresh biomass of 1.12 g. Co-inoculation with F. solani and Bacillus subtilis DMA1 in pot trials significantly increased root length (20.1 cm), shoot length (39.5 cm), root girth (14.9 mm), and total biomass (51.1 g) compared to control and Fusarium-only treatments. These findings indicate that Bacillus subtilis DMA1 reduced wilt incidence by 70% and enhanced plant growth under pathogen-stress conditions.

Keywords: Ashwagandha, landrace, microbiome, Nagori, rhizosphere

Graphical Abstract

Infographic illustrating an experimental workflow for soil and rhizosphere bacterial analysis in two plant genotypes from Rajasthan and Gujarat, including sample collection, metagenome sequencing, diversity analysis, bacterial identification, functional and antifungal assessment, correlation studies, and visualization of results with charts and maps.

1. Introduction

Ashwagandha (Withania somnifera (L) Dunal) is a dry, woody herb widely cultivated in tropical and subtropical regions of Asia, Africa, and parts of Europe (Paul et al., 2021). The species exhibits multiple morphotypes characterized by variations in berry color, root thickness, root brittleness, and a harvesting cycle of 180 to 300 days (Saran and Das, 2023; Saran et al., 2025a). Recently, the landrace ‘Nagori Ashwagandha' was officially registered under the Geographical Indications (GI) system as “The Fringes of the ‘Thar Desert' and ‘Nagori' Ashwagandha” by the Nagauri Welfare Society, based in Nagaur, Rajasthan (GI Application No. 1143; accessed on 19.02.2026), highlighting its importance within the Indian medicinal system. Ashwagandha, a powerful adaptogenic medicinal herb used in Ayurvedic medicine, is widely used to control chronic stress and anxiety, treat insomnia, boost immune function, enhance memory and cognitive function, and exhibit strong anti-inflammatory and antioxidant properties. It also plays a role in boosting testosterone levels and improving fertility in men. It lowers blood sugar and insulin resistance, modulates thyroid hormone levels, reduces blood pressure and cholesterol, and supports cardiovascular health (Mikulska et al., 2023; Sprengel et al., 2025). Different parts of the plant, such as the roots, shoots, leaves, and fruits, are generally used to prepare herbal medicines. However, the root extract of Ashwagandha is more commonly used in the production of commercial herbal supplements (Sengupta et al., 2018; Shinde et al., 2023; Saran et al., 2025b). India is the largest exporter of ashwagandha, producing an average of 6,720.7 metric tons of dry root from 10,000 hectares of cultivated land (Pandey et al., 2024). Over the past decade, India exported 26,784 shipments of ashwagandha through 1,683 exporters to 6,419 international buyers, highlighting its dominant role in the global ashwagandha market (Berra et al., 2024). The term “rhizospheric microbiome” refers to the community of microorganisms residing in the root zone of plants (Li et al., 2021; Ling et al., 2022). Different plant varieties secrete distinct root exudates, which strongly influence the structure and composition of microbial communities in the rhizosphere, phyllosphere, and endosphere. The rhizospheric microbiome is a highly engineered microbial community that is essential for several processes associated with plant nutrient uptake, plant growth promotion, and secondary metabolite biosynthesis, their contributions to plant through pathogen suppression, competition for niches, and induction of host immunity is well documented (Kushwaha et al., 2021; El sayed et al., 2023). Plants emit ‘cry for help' signals through their associated microbiome, which leads to the selective recruitment of beneficial microbes from the soil. This microbiome-mediated protective effect, often referred to as a soil-borne legacy, can persist across subsequent plant generations (Courtney et al., 2026). Plant genotype governs immune signaling, defense responses, and the production of secondary metabolites. The colonization of specific microbes depends on host-specific recognition. Deeper root architecture promotes more lateral roots, which provide ideal microhabitats for colonization by diverse microbes. Several environmental factors, such as soil physical, chemical, and biological properties; climatic conditions, including temperature and humidity; and plant genotypes, greatly influence the composition and function of the rhizosphere microbiota (Zhang et al., 2021; Park et al., 2023). Therefore, it is essential to investigate how different genotypes interact with soil properties and shape the surrounding microbial communities. These understandings of interactions promote microbiome-assisted breeding that leverages diverse beneficial microbiomes to enhance tolerance to abiotic and biotic stresses, improve nutrient use efficiency, and increase metabolite accumulation in medicinal plants. Previous research on medicinal plants has often relied on amplicon-based sequencing approaches (Mishra et al., 2021; Steinberger et al., 2024; Wang et al., 2023; Zhang et al., 2025). However, very few studies have investigated the rhizosphere microbiome of Withania somnifera root microbiome using either amplicon or shotgun metagenomic approaches. Amplicon sequencing is widely used for microbial taxonomic profiling and functional prediction due to its cost-effectiveness and relatively simple data analysis (Bharti and Grimm, 2021). It has been applied successfully in various environments, including soil (Oliveira et al., 2022; He et al., 2023), water (Galagoda et al., 2023), and animal gut systems (Thakur et al., 2022). However, this approach has limitations, including primer bias, restricted taxonomic resolution (often limited to the genus level), and limited insight into microbial functional capacity. To overcome these limitations, shotgun metagenomic sequencing provides a more detailed view of microbial communities by allowing strain-level identification and direct access to the functional gene content of the microbiome (Bharti and Grimm, 2021). This includes information on metabolic pathways, resistance genes, and other important microbial functions. These data are particularly useful for exploring complex plant–microbe interactions and their role in influencing plant health and secondary metabolite production (Li et al., 2024; Wiseschart et al., 2019). Thakur et al. (2025) employed shotgun sequencing to investigate microbial responses to tillage and crop-residue management, emphasizing their significance for nutrient cycling. A study by Yue et al. (2024) found evidence that microbiome assembly depends on genotype and showed the potential for using host-driven microbial recruitment, especially key fungi like Mortierella, in the wheat rhizosphere

Microbiome profiling of medicinal plants, such as Ashwagandha, elucidates how root-associated microbes affect secondary metabolite accumulation and plant adaptation to environmental stresses. The present study characterizes and compares the rhizospheric microbiomes of two widely cultivated Ashwagandha varieties, Nagori and Vallabh Ashwagandha-1, through shotgun metagenomic sequencing. Although Ashwagandha is recognized for its medicinal properties, the role of rhizosphere microbes in disease suppression remains underexplored. This study analyzes the rhizosphere microbiome in relation to the ashwagandha wilt pathogen Fusarium solani, a persistent challenge. Examining genotype-specific rhizosphere microbiomes enables the identification of microbial consortia associated with pathogen suppression and assesses how plant genotype influences the composition and function of the rhizosphere microbiome, particularly with respect to disease-suppressive communities. The findings aim to inform the development of microbiome-assisted strategies for sustainable wilt management and enhanced therapeutic quality in Ashwagandha.

2. Materials and methods

2.1. Sample collection and experimental setup

The study was conducted at two locations in India, and details of the experimental sites are provided in Table 1. Vallabh Ashwagandha-1 and Landrace Nagori Ashwagandha were selected for comparative microbiome compositional analysis and cultivated in both Gujarat and Rajasthan. Rhizosphere soil samples were collected from five randomly selected plants per plot at maturity (180 days). Soil adhering to the root surface was brushed off and pooled to form a single composite rhizosphere sample. Sampling was conducted at two independent locations, with two biological replicates collected at each location. These replicates were divided into two fractions for metagenomic and culturomics analyses of microbial diversity. Root samples exhibiting symptoms of Fusarium infection in Ashwagandha were collected, and disease incidence was assessed and recorded at both study sites.

Table 1.

Brief description of the sites and experimental design.

Group Sample name Seed variety Soil type Exact site Lat/Lon
GN GN-1 Landrace ‘Nagori Ashwgandha' Clay loam Boriavi, Anand, Gujarat, India 22°59′94” N; 72°93′36” E
GN-2
GV GV-1 Vallabh Ashwagandha-1 Clay loam Lambhvel, Anand, Gujarat, India 23°34′07” N; 72°56′38” E
GV-2
RN RN-1 Landrace ‘Nagori Ashwgandha' Sandy loam type Churu, Rajasthan, India 27°40′31” N, 74°08′55.3” E
RN-2

GN, Nagori Ashwagandha grown in Anand; GV, Vallabh Ahwagandha-1 grown in Gujarat; RN, Nagori Ashwgandha grown in Rajasthan.

2.2. Metagenomic library preparation, diversity, analysis, and functional analysis

Metagenomic DNA was extracted from rhizospheric soils using the PowerSoil DNA extraction kit (Qiagen, USA). DNA quality was verified by gel electrophoresis, and concentration was measured with a Nanodrop spectrophotometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA). Sequencing libraries were prepared using the Illumina Nextera XT DNA Library Preparation Kit (Illumina, Inc., USA). Library insert selection was performed with an Agilent TapeStation 4150 system and high-sensitivity D1000 screentape (Agilent, USA). The V3-V4 hypervariable regions of the 16S rRNA gene were amplified using region-specific primers (Forward primer: CCTAYGGGRBGCASCAG; Reverse primer: GGACTACNNGGGTATCTAAT) (Hjelmsø et al., 2014). Shotgun metagenomic sequencing was conducted on an Illumina NovaSeq 6000 system using 2 × 150 bp paired-end chemistry at Unigenome Pvt. Ltd, Ahmedabad, India. Quality assessment of raw reads was performed using FastQC v.0.11.9 with default parameters (Andrews, 2017). Adapter trimming was conducted using Fastp v.0.20.1 (parameters: –trim_front1 2 –trim_front2 2 –trim_tail1 0 –trim_tail2 0 –length_required 50 –correction –trim_poly_g –qualified_quality_phred 30) (Chen et al., 2018), followed by a subsequent quality re-assessment with FastQC (Andrews, 2017). High-quality reads were annotated using Kraken2 v.2.1.1 (Wood et al., 2019) against the RefSeq standard database. Taxonomic abundances were analyzed using the Bracken Bayesian method (Lu et al., 2017) with default parameters. Bracken outputs were converted into a biological observation matrix (BIOM) using the kraken-biom tool (Dabdoub, 2016). Amplicon sequence variants were generated, filtered, and taxonomically classified using a Naive Bayes classifier trained on the SILVA rRNA gene database (Release 138) for the extracted amplicon region. Classification was implemented in QIIME2 using the feature-classifier plugin (Bokulich et al., 2018). Relative abundances were extracted from BIOM files and summarized using the summarize_taxa.py script within the QIIME v.1.9 package (Caporaso et al., 2010). Metagenomic sequences are deposited in the NCBI SRA under biosample accession (SAMN56297678, SAMN56297679, SAMN56297680).

2.3. Assessment of chemical properties of the soil

Soil samples collected from the experimental site were analyzed for pH and electrical conductivity (EC) following the protocol described by Jackson (1973). Soil organic carbon (SOC) was determined using the Walkley and Black (1934) wet oxidation method. Available nitrogen (AvN) was quantified using the alkaline permanganate method (Subbiah and Asija, 1956). The ascorbic acid reductant method was employed to evaluate available phosphorus (AvP) content (Olsen, 1954). Available potassium (AvK) content was measured by flame photometry using a neutral 1N ammonium acetate (NH4CH3CO2) extractant (Jackson, 1973).

2.4. Identification of native bacterial isolates from Ashwagandha rhizosphere

Rhizosphere soil samples from both locations were serially diluted to 10−6 and 10−7, and 100 μl from each dilution was spread onto Nutrient Agar, ISP medium-5, and ISP medium-2. Plates were incubated at 28 ±2 °C for 3–7 days. Bacterial colonies were subcultured onto fresh media to obtain pure cultures. Genomic DNA was extracted from purified bacterial isolates using the QIAprep spin Miniprep kit according to the manufacturer's protocol. DNA quality and concentration were assessed using a Denovix spectrophotometer (USA), and integrity was confirmed on a 1% agarose gel. Bacterial DNA was amplified using universal primers (27F: 5′ AGAGTTTGATCMTGGCTCAG-3′, 1492R: 5′-TACGGYTACCTTGTTACGACTT-3′). PCR reactions were conducted in a 20 μL volume containing 1 μL template DNA, 0.5 μM of each primer, 10 μL of 2 × PCR master mix, and nuclease-free water. Amplification conditions consisted of an initial denaturation at 94 °C for 5 min, followed by 35 cycles of 94 °C for 30 s, 55 °C for 45 s, and 72 °C for 1 min, with a final extension at 72 °C for 7 min. Amplicons were visualized on a 1.5% agarose gel stained with ethidium bromide and submitted for sequencing via commercial services. Raw sequences were edited and aligned using MEGA 11. Taxonomic identity was determined by comparing sequences against the NCBI GenBank database using BLASTn.

2.5. In vitro antifungal assay against Ashwagandha wilt

The antifungal activity of cultured rhizosphere soil isolates against Fusarium solani was assessed using a dual-culture assay on potato dextrose agar (PDA). A 5 mm mycelial disc of Fusarium solani was placed on one side of the PDA plate, and the rhizospheric isolate was streaked on the opposite side. Plates were incubated at 28 ± 2 °C for 5 to 7 days, with pathogen-only plates serving as controls. Experiments were conducted in triplicate. Antagonistic activity was quantified by measuring the pathogen's radial growth inhibition. The percentage inhibition of mycelial growth (PIMG) was calculated as follows: PIMG (%) = [(R1 - R2)/R1] × 100, where R1 represents radial growth in the control plate, and R2 represents growth in the dual culture plate. Isolates exhibiting a clear inhibition zone or a significant reduction in pathogen growth were classified as possessing antifungal potential (Mageshwaran et al., 2022).

2.6. Growth parameters assessment

The plant growth-promoting activity of selected rhizospheric isolates was assessed using a germination paper assay under controlled conditions. Surface-sterilized ashwagandha seeds (Vallabh Ashwagandha-1) were treated with bacterial suspensions (108 CFU/mL) and placed on sterile germination paper moistened with sterile distilled water. Samples were incubated in a growth chamber at 25 ± 2 °C with a 12-hour light/dark cycle for 10 days. Control samples were prepared identically but without bacterial inoculation. All experiments were conducted in triplicate. After incubation, growth parameters, including germination percentage, root length, shoot length, fresh weight, and vigor index, were recorded. The Seedling Vigor Index was calculated as SVI = (Root length + Shoot length) × Germination percentage)/100 (Abdul-Baki and Anderson, 1973). Similarly, seeds of the tomato cultivar Gujarat Anand Tomato-5 were utilized to evaluate plant growth–promoting activity under experimental conditions.

2.7. Evaluation of Bacillus subtilis DMA1 for wilt management in pot trial

Preliminary screening using seed germination and dual-culture assays identified Bacillus subtilis DMA1 as having potential antagonistic and growth-promoting activity evaluated under pot conditions. The biocontrol efficacy of DMA1 against Fusarium solani was assessed through three treatments: Control, Fusarium solani inoculation alone, and co-inoculation of both Bacillus subtilis DMA1 and Fusarium solani. Growth parameters, including root length, shoot length, root girth, total plant biomass, and disease incidence, were recorded.

2.8. Statistical analysis

All analyses were performed using R software (Horton and Kleinman, 2015). Microbial community clustering at the phylum and genus levels was conducted using relative abundance data with the Microeco R package (Liu et al., 2021). Alpha diversity indices, including Good's coverage, observed species, Shannon, and Simpson, were calculated using Phyloseq and Microeco. Beta diversity was evaluated with the Bray–Curtis dissimilarity index and visualized using Principal Coordinate Analysis (PCoA) and hierarchical clustering. Differences in community composition were determined by PERMANOVA. Functional annotation of the shotgun metagenomic reads was performed by aligning high-quality sequences against the KEGG Orthology (KO) database using DIAMOND tool (Bagcl et al., 2021) (blastx mode) with an e-value cutoff of 1e−5. KO assignments were based on the best-hit criterion and classified into KEGG Level 1 and Level 2 pathways. To account for variation in sequencing depth, KO counts were normalized using relative abundance scaling by dividing individual KO counts by the total annotated reads per sample. Statistical comparisons of KEGG Level 2 pathway abundances among the three groups (GN, GV, and RN) were conducted using the Kruskal–Wallis test. Statistical significance was considered at p < 0.05. Functional profiles were visualized using the R statistical environment. Correlation analysis matrices, Mantel tests, and Pearson correlation analyses were performed on soil chemical properties and the relative abundance of dominant bacterial phyla, using the vegan package for the Mantel test and base R functions for the Pearson correlation analyses. Antifungal and growth-promotion activities were evaluated using one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey's HSD test (P ≤ 0.05). All wet lab experiments were conducted in triplicate, and results are presented as mean ± standard deviation (SD).

3. Results

3.1. Metagenomic analysis and taxonomic assignment of soil samples

Shotgun sequencing generated 232.56 million raw reads across all samples, averaging 38.76 million per sample (range: 30.84 to 58.94 million). After quality filtering, 228.48 million high-quality reads remained, averaging 38.08 million per sample (range: 30.14 to 57.60 million). These reads were classified taxonomically using Kraken2 and the GTDB v207 database for bacterial identification. In total, 17.04 million reads were assigned to bacterial taxa, resulting in a diverse community of 9,356 bacterial species in the final dataset. Taxonomic assignment identified distinct microbial community patterns among the three treatment groups. Clustering analysis indicated that the Landrace ‘Nagori' groups (GN and RN) shared more similar bacterial taxa than the Vallabh ashwagandha-1 group (GV) (Figures 1a, b). The dominant bacterial phyla across all samples were Actinomycetota, Pseudomonadota, Planctomycota, Myxococcota, and Bacillota. GN and RN exhibited more similar phyla distributions than GV (Figure 1a). In GN, Actinomycetota (56%), Pseudomonadota (36%), Planctomycota (2.6%), Myxococcota (2%), and Bacillota (1.5%) comprised 98.1% of total abundance. In RN, Actinomycetota (60%), Pseudomonadota (35%), Planctomycota (1%), Bacillota (1.5%), and Myxococcota (1%) accounted for 98.5%. The GV group consisted of Actinomycetota (46%), Pseudomonadota (42%), Planctomycota (3%), Myxococcota (2.5%), and Bacillota (2.5%), totaling 96%. At the genus level, Nocardioides, Streptomyces, and Bradyrhizobium were the top three genera in all groups (Figure 1b). In GN, Nocardioides (8.8%), Streptomyces (6.5%), and Bradyrhizobium (1.5%) were most abundant. RN was characterized by Nocardioides (6.6%), Streptomyces (4.5%), and Bradyrhizobium (1.0%), while GV showed lower Nocardioides (3.1%) but higher Streptomyces (5.6%) and Bradyrhizobium (1.6%). Overall, the Nagori variety (GN and RN) supported a more Actinomycetota-dominated rhizosphere, whereas GV was relatively enriched in Pseudomonadota, highlighting the influence of host variety on rhizosphere microbial composition.

Figure 1.

Panel a shows a principal coordinates analysis (PCoA) plot with three color-coded groups (GN, GV, RN), each containing two points connected by lines, differentiated by shape for Nagori and Valsabh varieties. Panel b displays a dendrogram depicting hierarchical clustering with labeled branches for GV-1, GV-2, GN-1, GN-2, RN-1, and RN-2.

Hierarchical clustering-based relative abundance of dominant bacterial taxa in the rhizosphere of landrace ‘Nagori Ashwagandha' (GN and RN) and Vallabh Ashwagandha-1 (GV) across three experimental sites. (a) Phylum-level distribution and (b) Genus-level distribution.

3.2. Diversity and functional analysis

Alpha diversity metrics showed variation among all groups, but this variation was not statistically significant (p<0.05) (Figure 3). Good's coverage values were consistently high across all genotypes, at 0.99, indicating that sequencing depth captured most bacterial taxa (Figure 3a). Observed species richness was highest in the GV group, followed by the RN and GN groups (Figure 3b). The Simpson index exhibited a similar pattern, with GV showing the highest value, followed by GN, and RN the lowest (Figure 3d). Overall, GN and RN groups displayed similar diversity patterns compared to GV (Figures 3a-d). However, alpha-diversity metrics did not differ significantly (p > 0.05).

Figure 3.

Bar charts comparing the relative abundance of bacterial communities in RN, GN, and GV groups; panel (a) shows abundance at the phylum level, while panel (b) shows abundance at the genus level, both with color-coded keys.

Alpha diversity analysis of rhizosphere bacterial communities associated with GN, GV, and RN. (a) Good's coverage, (b) observed species richness, (c) Shannon diversity index, and (d) Simpson diversity index. Boxplots represent median values with interquartile ranges; whiskers indicate minimum and maximum values. Differences among genotypes were evaluated using one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey's HSD test. “ns” indicates non-significant differences (p > 0.05).

Beta diversity was evaluated using the Bray-Curtis distance index and visualized through PCoA and dendrogram plots. The GN and RN groups clustered closely in ordination space relative to the GV group. The first two principal coordinates explained 50.8% and 28.5% of the variation, together accounting for 79.3% of the variability in bacterial community composition (Figure 4a). Hierarchical clustering further grouped GN and RN within the same clade, while GV formed a separate cluster (Figure 4b). Although partial clustering trends were observed, PERMANOVA analysis indicated that genotype did not significantly affect overall community composition (p > 0.05). These findings suggest that genotype may influence community structure; however, the differences were not statistically significant under the tested conditions.

Figure 4.

Four box plots compare GN, GV, and RN across four diversity metrics: (a) Coverage, (b) Observed, (c) Shannon, and (d) Simpson indexes. No statistically significant differences are indicated, as all comparisons are labeled “ns.”.

Beta diversity analysis of rhizosphere bacterial communities associated with GN, GV, and RN. (a) Principal Coordinates Analysis (PCoA) based on Bray–Curtis dissimilarity showing clustering patterns among samples. (b) Hierarchical clustering dendrogram constructed using Bray–Curtis distance, illustrating similarity relationships among samples.

Functional profiling based on Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) annotation showed that Tier-1 categories namely Metabolism, Organismal Systems, and Human Diseases were predominant across all genotypes; however, these assignments primarily represent conserved, homologous pathway modules rather than pathways directly related to disease processes (Figure 5a). Similarly, Tier 2 modules such as signal transduction, biosynthesis of secondary metabolites, cell growth and death, and folding, sorting, and degradation were prevalent in all groups (Figure 5b). No significant variations were observed in Tier 1 and Tier 2 KEGG modules, indicating that microbial functional capabilities are conserved across genotypes.

Figure 5.

Heatmap and network graph illustrating Pearson's correlation coefficients between environmental variables including pH, electrical conductivity (EC), organic carbon (OC), available nitrogen (AvN), available phosphorus (AvP), and available potassium (AvK) with major bacterial phyla Actinomycetota and Pseudomonadota. Colored squares indicate correlation strength and direction ranging from blue (positive) to red (negative), with black dots marking significant Mantel's r values and red lines representing significant Mantel's p values.

KEGG-based functional profiling of rhizosphere bacterial communities associated with GN, GV, and RN. Relative abundance (%) of predicted functional pathways is shown at (a) KEGG Tier 1 categories and (b) KEGG Tier 2 categories. Functional annotations were assigned using KEGG database classifications, and values represent the proportional distribution of predicted metabolic pathways across genotypes.

3.3. Soil chemical properties and their correlations with the bacterial taxa

Soil pH ranged from 7.8 to 8.0 across genotypes, indicating alkaline conditions across treatments. Electrical conductivity (EC) varied between 0.14 and 0.26 dS m−1. Organic carbon (OC) content was highest in GN (0.53%), followed by RN (0.30%) and GV (0.24%). Available nitrogen (AvN) was highest in GN (244.6 kg ha−1), followed by GV (219.5 kg ha−1) and RN (175.65 kg ha−1). Available phosphorus (AvP) was also highest in GN (33.2 kg ha−1), with GV (22.7 kg ha−1) and RN (20.3 kg ha−1) showing lower levels. Conversely, available potassium (AvK) was highest in RN (566.5 kg ha−1), followed by GV (404 kg ha−1) and GN (326.2 kg ha−1). The physicochemical properties of soil at the two experimental sites are summarized in Table 2. The Mantel test was used to evaluate correlations between soil chemical properties (pH, EC, OC, AvN, AvP, and AvK) and the relative abundance of two bacterial phyla (Actinomycetota and Pseudomonadota). This analysis revealed moderate correlation coefficients (r = 0.3–0.6) between soil nutrients (AvK and AvN) and the relative abundance of Actinomycetota and Pseudomonadota. Pearson correlation analysis indicated a negative trend between AvK and other soil parameters, whereas pH, EC, OC, AvN, and AvP exhibited positive intercorrelations (Figure 2).

Table 2.

The chemical properties analysis of soil samples across the groups.

Group Soil texture pH EC (dS m−1) OC (%) AvN (kg ha−1) AvP (kg ha−1) AvK (kg ha−1)
GN clay loam type 8.0 ± 0.10 0.24 ± 0.0045 0.54 ± 0.01 245.3 ± 0.75 34.25 ± 1.05 326.8 ± 0.60
GV clay loam type 7.7 ± 0.025 0.18 ± 0.005 0.24 ± 0.0025 219.5 ± 1.20 22.7 ± 0.55 404. ± 3.25
RN sandy loam type 7.7 ± 0.05 0.14 ± 0.01 0.30 ± 0.01 175.6 ± 2.4 20.3 ± 1.2 566.5 ± 1.8

All the values are presented in the mean ± standard error (n=2).

Figure 2.

Two adjacent stacked bar charts compare the relative abundance of KEGG functional categories in three sample groups labeled RN, GN, and GV. Chart (a) displays broad KEGG Tier 1 categories with color-coded sections for cellular processes, environmental information processing, genetic information processing, human diseases, metabolism, and organismal systems. Chart (b) provides a detailed breakdown by KEGG Tier 2 categories, highlighting specific processes such as amino acid metabolism, carbohydrate metabolism, and transport, with an extensive color legend matching categories to bar segments. Both charts use percentage on the y-axis to indicate abundance.

Correlation analysis between dominant bacterial phyla and soil physicochemical properties. Pearson correlation coefficients (r) among soil variables (pH, EC, OC, available N, P, and K) are presented in the upper triangular matrix, with color intensity indicating the strength and direction of the correlation (blue = positive; red = negative). Asterisks indicate significance levels (p < 0.05, *p < 0.01, **p < 0.001). Mantel tests were performed to assess the association between bacterial community composition (Actinomycetota and Pseudomonadota) and soil properties. Line thickness represents the strength of Mantel's correlation coefficient (r), and line color indicates statistical significance (p ≥ 0.05 as indicated).

3.4. Identification of native bacterial isolates from Ashwagandha rhizosphere

The seventeen isolates were obtained from culturomics at two rhizospheric locations listed in Supplementary Table 1, along with their NCBI accession numbers

Bacillus species were represented in metagenomic profiles from both locations and included multiple strains, including Bacillus subtilis (ASN1, DMA1, DMA5, AF14, ASN16), Bacillus altitudinus (DMA2), and Bacillus tequilensis (CM6). Within the genus Pseudomonas, Pseudomonas synxantha IS5 and Pseudomonas oryzihabitans A15 were identified. Members of Actinobacteria, particularly Nocardiopsis, were detected in both sequencing-based analyses and culturable fractions, represented by Nocardiopsis salina AN10 and Nocardiopsis dassonvillei A5. The identification of Achromobacter xylosoxidans A26, Achromobacter xylosoxidans AN2 Mesobacillus foraminis ASN10, Brevibacillus nitrificans Ngy2, Priestia aryabhattai ASN8 and Leclercia tamurae PL2, in both metagenomic data and cultured isolates, highlight the overlap between culture-dependent and culture-independent approaches. Pure cultures of Bacillus subtilis DMA1 (NAIMCC-B-04593) were deposited at the National Agriculturally Important Microbial Culture Collection (NAIMCC-WDCM60), Mau, Uttar Pradesh, India.

3.5. In vitro antifungal and plant growth promotion activity against the Fusarium wilt pathogen

The antagonistic activity and plant growth-promoting potential of 17 microbial treatments were evaluated against Fusarium solani AF2 (PQ066037) isolated from ICAR-DMAPR Boriavi Anand, Gujarat (Shreedevasena et al., 2025). Bacillus subtilis DMA1 exhibited the highest mycelial inhibition (64%), with germination percentage (98%), root length (2.1 cm), and shoot length (1.3 cm), seed vigor index (333.2), and maximum fresh biomass (1.12 g), demonstrating both antagonistic and growth-promoting efficacy. Pseudomonas synxantha IS5 with 60% mycelial inhibition, high germination (83%), root length 2.0 cm; shoot length 1.2 cm, seed vigor index (265.6), and increased fresh biomass (1.02 g). Similarly, Bacillus tequilensis CM6 showed antagonistic activity (58%), with 78% germination rate, seed vigor (210.6), and fresh biomass (0.98 g). Brevibacillus nitrificans Ngy 2, Leclercia tamurae PL2 and Mesobacillus foraminis ASN10 showed 23–28% mycelial inhibition with reduced growth-promoting activity (Supplementary Figure 1). Tomato seeds treated with Bacillus subtilis strain DMA1 showed significant growth improvements. Plant height and root length increased by 1.4 and 1.5 times, respectively, compared to untreated seeds. Fresh shoot biomass was 1.4 times higher, while fresh root weight was slightly higher than that of controls (Supplementary Figure 2).

3.6. Evaluation of Bacillus subtilis DMA1 for Wilt Management under Pot Trial

The wilt incidence of ashwagandha was 67% under field conditions, and infected plants showed yellowing leaves and wilting symptoms accompanied by root rotFusarium solani alone significantly reduced root length (7.4 cm), shoot length (19.1 cm), root girth (7.23 mm), and total biomass (19.4 g) compared to the control (15.3 cm, 28.4 cm, 9.25 mm, and 28.3 g, respectively), with the highest disease incidence of 80%. Co-inoculation with F. solani and Bacillus subtilis DMA 1 significantly increased root length (20.1 cm), shoot length (39.5 cm), root girth (14.9 mm), and total biomass (51.1 g) compared to both control and pathogen-alone treatments (Figure 6, Supplementary Figure 3). Disease incidence was reduced by 70% in Bacillus subtilis DMA1 treatment.

Figure 6.

Panel a shows two rows of 18 plant seedlings next to a ruler, each with varied root and shoot lengths. Panel b displays three mature plants with exposed roots, and a close-up of root damage. Panel c features three labeled potted plants, each displaying differences in leaf health and growth. Panel e presents two petri dishes with fungal colonies, showing distinct growth patterns. All panels are labeled with letters and numbers for reference.

Evaluation of bacterial isolates for growth promotion and biocontrol activity against Fusarium solani. (a) Roll paper towel germination assay showing the effects of seventeen bacterial isolates on seedling growth (1. Bacillus subtilis DMA1, 2. Pseudomonas synxantha IS5, 3. Bacillus tequilensis CM6, 4. Bacillus altitudinis DMA2, 5. Bacillus subtilis ASN16, 6. Bacillus subtilis AF 14, 7. Pseudomonas oryzihabitans A15, 8.Control, 9. Nocardiopsis salina AN10, 10.Nocardiopsis dassonvillei A510, 11. Bacillus subtilis DMA5, 12. Bacillus subtilis ASN1, 13. Priestia aryabhattai ASN8, 14. Mesobacillus foraminis ASN10, 15. Leclercia tamurae PL2, 16. Achromobacter xylosoxidans AN2, 17. Achromobacter xylosoxidans A26, 18. Brevibacillus nitrificans Ngy 2) (b) and (c) Pot experiment demonstrating the effect of Bacillus subtilis DMA1 on plant growth and disease suppression under pathogen challenge: (1) Control, (2) Fusarium solani + Bacillus subtilis DMA1 (co-inoculation), and (3) Fusarium solani alone. (d) Root infection symptoms caused by Fusarium solani, showing characteristic discoloration and tissue necrosis. (e) Dual culture assay (a) Fusarium solani control plate and (b) Mycelial inhibition of Bacillus subtilis DMA1.

4. Discussion

This study examined the effects of Ashwagandha genotypes on soil chemical properties, microbial community structure, diversity, and functional profiles across two agroecological locations. A comparative analysis of the rhizomicrobiome of Nagori and Vallabh ashwagandha-1 was conducted to elucidate the combined effects of plant genotype and geography. Metagenomic sequencing revealed a highly diverse bacterial community, with approximately 9,000 bacterial species identified across three groups. Community composition analysis indicated greater similarity between GN and RN samples (Nagori) than between GV (Vallabh) and GN/RN samples, suggesting that host plant genotype is a primary determinant of rhizosphere microbial structure, even across distinct geographic locations. This genotype-driven clustering is consistent with previous research demonstrating strong host control over rhizosphere microbiome assembly (Singh et al., 2022; Zhang et al., 2022; Zheng et al., 2023; Steinberger et al., 2024; Sutherland et al., 2022). Actinomycetota were the dominant bacterial phylum in Nagori (GN and RN), whereas the Vallabh variety (GV) showed a higher relative abundance of Pseudomonadota. The predominance of Actinomycetota in the Nagori rhizosphere suggests a genotype-associated core microbiome adapted to nutrient-poor, semi-arid soils. Actinomycetota are recognized for producing dormant spores and osmoprotective compounds, which enhance resilience under low-moisture and nutrient-limited conditions (Delgado-Baquerizo et al., 2018; Naylor et al., 2017). At the genus level, Nocardioides, Streptomyces, and Bradyrhizobium were dominant and are known for their plant growth-promoting functions, including nitrogen fixation, phytohormone production, and antimicrobial activity (Hnini and Aurag, 2024). The reduced abundance of these genera in the GV group indicates weaker maintenance of functionally important taxa, potentially due to genotype-specific root exudation patterns or microbe–plant compatibility shaped by agroecological and edaphic factors. Alpha diversity indices in the GV group consistently showed higher richness and evenness, as indicated by observed species counts, Shannon's index, and Simpson's index, and increased diversity was associated with lower nutrient availability, suggesting that nutrient richness alone does not determine microbial diversity. Nutrient-rich environments may promote dominance by fast-growing taxa, reducing community evenness (Wang et al., 2020; Zhu et al., 2022). Although the difference was not statistically significant, a similar observation was also reported by Alawiye and Babalola (2021) in the sunflower rhizosphere microbiome. GN and GV were cultivated under similar environmental conditions; the observed differences in diversity likely reflect genotype-driven effects, potentially mediated by variations in root exudate composition and secondary metabolite profiles that influence microbial recruitment (Anderson et al., 2024; Han et al., 2025). Beta-diversity analyses further supported these findings, with partial clustering of GN and RN together, and GV forming a distinct group, reinforcing the influence of plant genotype on rhizosphere microbial assemblages. Functional profiling using KEGG pathway analysis revealed that core microbial functions related to metabolism, signal transduction, and cell growth and death were conserved across all groups. This functional redundancy indicates that, despite taxonomic shifts, essential ecological processes remain stable within the rhizosphere. Such redundancy is considered essential for maintaining ecosystem resilience and functional stability under environmental stress, a pattern frequently observed in soil microbiomes (Chen et al., 2022).

Variations in soil chemical properties among the three groups (GN, GV, and RN) reflect the combined effects of site-specific edaphic conditions and host genotypes. The Gujarat-grown Nagori (GN) group exhibited higher soil pH, electrical conductivity, organic carbon, and macronutrient availability, particularly nitrogen and phosphorus, indicating a nutrient-enriched rhizosphere. Previous studies have demonstrated that elevated organic carbon and available nitrogen are key drivers of microbial activity and nutrient turnover, supporting a more functionally active microbial community (Prommer et al., 2020; Chauhan et al., 2023; Lv et al., 2024). The Nagori group in Rajasthan (RN) displayed the highest available potassium levels but lower concentrations of other soil nutrients. This pattern likely reflects the mineralogical properties of Rajasthan soils, which are often enriched in potassium minerals, rather than being solely attributable to varietal effects (Sharma et al., 2023). Such edaphic constraints limit organic matter accumulation and nutrient availability, thereby shaping distinct rhizosphere conditions. Gujarat Vallabh (GV) group exhibited intermediate soil chemical parameters, with lower organic carbon content than GN. Although both GN and GV were cultivated under the same conditions, these differences suggest a potential genotype influence on rhizosphere nutrient dynamics within the same geographic setting (Steinberger et al., 2024). The results for GN indicate enhanced organic carbon and nitrogen availability, favoring greater microbial activity and nutrient mineralization, whereas the elevated potassium levels in RN soils primarily reflect intrinsic soil mineralogy. Collectively, these findings underscore the combined influence of plant genotype and regional soil characteristics on the structuring of rhizosphere nutrient environments. Mantel test analysis revealed moderate positive correlations between the dominant bacterial phyla (Actinomycetota and Pseudomonadota) and the availability of nitrogen and potassium. These trends align with previous reports indicating that soil nutrient availability influences microbial community composition, often in a genotype-dependent manner (Sharma et al., 2023). The preferential enrichment of Actinomycetota in potassium-rich, nutrient-limited soils may confer a selective advantage by enhancing nutrient mobilization and stress tolerance in arid environments (Delgado-Baquerizo et al., 2018). Additionally, available potassium exhibited a negative correlation with most other soil chemical properties, suggesting complex nutrient trade-offs within the rhizosphere. These interactions may indirectly influence microbial community dynamics by altering nutrient accessibility and competitive interactions among microbial taxa (Steinberger et al., 2024).

A consistent set of dominant bacterial phyla was identified across both geographic locations, indicating a core Ashwagandha-associated microbiome. Actinomycetota were consistently detected at both sites, although their relative abundance varied with environmental conditions. Few studies have examined both culturable and unculturable microbial diversity in Ashwagandha; however, these findings align with rhizosphere microbiome studies in other crops, such as citrus, where similar phyla were observed across locations and seasons (Lima et al., 2024). Traditional culture-based methods capture only a small fraction of total microbial diversity (0.1–10%), underscoring the importance of metagenomic approaches for comprehensive microbiome characterization (D'Onofrio et al., 2010; Goulart et al., 2019).

A comparative analysis of culture-independent metagenomic profiling and culture-dependent isolation demonstrated strong concordance between the dominant bacterial taxa in the Ashwagandha rhizosphere and the native bacterial strains isolated from it. Shotgun metagenomic sequencing and culturomics analysis identified Bacillaceae, Pseudomonadaceae, Nocardiopsaceae, and Alcaligenaceae as the predominant families. Functional annotation of metagenomic reads using the KEGG database revealed enrichment of pathways related to secondary metabolite biosynthesis, nutrient cycling, and stress response. The combined use of metagenomics and culturomics enabled the identification of dominant, functionally relevant bacterial taxa in the Ashwagandha rhizosphere, thereby supporting the selection of promising native isolates for biocontrol and plant growth promotion This functional convergence indicates that culturable members are key contributors to the rhizosphere microbiome's metabolic potential.

The functional significance of the rhizosphere microbiome was further demonstrated by the antifungal activity of bacterial isolates against Fusarium solani, the causal agent of Ashwagandha wilt. Numerous studies have established the biocontrol efficacy of Bacillus subtilis and Pseudomonas fluorescens against soil-borne pathogens, including Fusarium species, through mechanisms such as antibiosis, competition, and induction of systemic resistance (Gowtham et al., 2016; Khan et al., 2018; Duan et al., 2023; Lu et al., 2024). The functional profiling further indicated the presence of genes associated with terpenoid and polyketide metabolism in the rhizosphere metagenomes, which are putatively linked to microbial secondary metabolite production and may contribute to plant defense–related interactions in the rhizosphere B. subtilis DMA1 exhibited strong in vitro antagonistic activity (64% inhibition) against F. solani reduces disease incidence by 70% in pot trials with increased growth-promoting activity, highlighting its potential as a beneficial rhizosphere inhabitant that contributes to disease suppression. Although reports on the biological control of Ashwagandha wilt are limited, these results, together with previous studies on stress mitigation and growth promotion by B. subtilis strains (Patel et al., 2023) underscore the importance of indigenous rhizosphere microbes in promoting plant health. Collectively, these findings suggest that genotype-driven recruitment of beneficial microbial consortia may enhance stress tolerance and disease resistance in Ashwagandha. The study demonstrates that Ashwagandha genotype strongly influences soil chemical properties, rhizosphere microbial composition, and functional potential. The indigenous Nagori genotype consistently supports a microbiome enriched in stress-resilient Actinomycetota across contrasting environments, reinforcing its adaptation to semi-arid agroecological conditions. These results emphasize the importance of integrating plant genotype, soil chemistry, and microbiome interactions in future strategies for sustainable cultivation and microbiome-assisted breeding of medicinal plants.

5. Conclusion

The rhizospheric microbial communities of two Ashwagandha genotypes, Nagori and Vallabh-1, were analyzed at two distinct agroecological sites. The results indicate that plant genotype significantly affects both soil chemical properties and rhizomicrobiome composition. The Nagori genotype in Rajasthan (RN) and Gujarat (GN) consistently exhibited Actinomycetota-dominated microbiomes, demonstrating that genotype-specific microbial associations persist across locations. Both metagenomic and laboratory analyses showed that Nagori and Vallabh Ashwagandha-1 (VA-1) predominantly recruited Bacillus and Pseudomonas, taxa recognized for their antifungal and biocontrol properties. These findings clarify genotype-specific recruitment patterns and suggest the potential to incorporate beneficial microbial communities into sustainable Ashwagandha production. Overall, the study highlights that host genotype-microbiome interactions can support the development of climate-resilient medicinal crops through microbiome-assisted breeding, especially in nutrient-poor, semi-arid soils, thereby improving stress resilience, nutrient use efficiency, and bioactive compound accumulation.

Acknowledgments

Research was supported by the Indian Council of Agricultural Research, Department of Agricultural Research and Education, Government of India.

Funding Statement

The author(s) declared that financial support was not received for this work and/or its publication.

Footnotes

Edited by: Dharmendra Kumar, Central Potato Research Institute (ICAR), India

Reviewed by: Vishal Srivastava, Cleveland Clinic, United States

Devendra Singh, Central Arid Zone Research Institute (ICAR), India

Data availability statement

The datasets presented in this study can be found in online repositories. The names of the repository/repositories and accession number(s) can be found in the article/Supplementary material.

Author contributions

SYB: Writing – review & editing, Software, Writing – original draft, Methodology, Formal analysis, Investigation, Visualization, Data curation, Conceptualization, Project administration, Supervision. SS: Software, Methodology, Writing – original draft, Investigation, Validation. PLS: Resources, Writing – review & editing. GNK: Writing – review & editing, Investigation, Resources. MD: Writing – review & editing, Resources, Supervision.

Conflict of interest

The author(s) declared that this work was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Generative AI statement

The author(s) declared that generative AI was not used in the creation of this manuscript.

Any alternative text (alt text) provided alongside figures in this article has been generated by Frontiers with the support of artificial intelligence and reasonable efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, including review by the authors wherever possible. If you identify any issues, please contact us.

Publisher's note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Supplementary material

The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fmicb.2026.1786817/full#supplementary-material

Table_1.DOCX (3.5MB, DOCX)

References

  1. Abdul-Baki A. A., Anderson J. D. (1973). Vigor determination in soybean seed by multiple criteria 1. Crop Sci. 13, 630–633. doi: 10.2135/cropsci1973.0011183X001300060013x [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  2. Alawiye T. T., Babalola O. O. (2021). Metagenomic insight into the community structure and functional genes in the sunflower rhizosphere microbiome. Agriculture 11:167. doi: 10.3390/agriculture11020167 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  3. Anderson H. M., Cagle G. A., Majumder E. L.-W., Silva E., Dawson J., Simon P., et al. (2024). ‘Root exudation and rhizosphere microbial assembly are influenced by novel plant trait diversity in carrot genotypes', Soil Biol. Bioche. 197:109516. doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2024.109516 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  4. Andrews S. A. (2017). FastQC: A Quality Control Tool for High Throughput Sequence Data. Available online at: http://www.bioinformatics.babraham.ac.uk/projects/fastqc
  5. Bagcl C., Patz S., Huson D. H. (2021). DIAMOND+ MEGAN: fast and easy taxonomic and functional analysis of short and long microbiome sequences. Curr. protocol. 1:e59. doi: 10.1002/cpz1.59 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Berra J. L., Chernigoy S., Alvarez K., Wernisch M. J. (2024). Ashwagandha under fire: a critical scientific analysis of regulatory decisions. Int. J. Ayurveda Res. 5, 148–153. doi: 10.4103/ijar.ijar_192_24 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  7. Bharti R., Grimm D. G. (2021). Current challenges and best-practice protocols for microbiome analysis. Brief. Bioinform. 22, 178–193. doi: 10.1093/bib/bbz155 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Bokulich N. A., Kaehler B. D., Rideout J. R., Dillon M., Bolyen E., Knight R., et al. (2018). Optimizing taxonomic classification of marker-gene amplicon sequences with QIIME 2's q2-feature-classifier plugin. Microbiome 6:90. doi: 10.1186/s40168-018-0470-z [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Caporaso J. G., Kuczynski J., Stombaugh J., Bittinger D., Bushman F. D., Costello E. K., et al. (2010). QIIME allows analysis of high-throughput community sequencing data. Nat. Methods 7, 335–336. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.f.303 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Chauhan P., Sharma N., Tapwal A., Kumar A., Verma G. S., Meena M., et al. (2023). Soil microbiome: diversity, benefits and interactions with plants. Sustainability 15:14643. doi: 10.3390/su151914643 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  11. Chen H., Ma K., Lu C., Fu Q., Qiu Y., Zhao J., et al. (2022). Functional redundancy in soil microbial community based on metagenomics across the globe. Front. Microbiol. 13:878978. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2022.878978 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Chen S., Zhou Y., Chen Y., Gu J. (2018). Fastp: an ultra-fast all-in-one FASTQ preprocessor. Bioinformatics 34, i884–i890. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bty560 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Courtney L. Tharp Gordon F. Custer Gabriel C.astrillo. Francisco Dini-Andreote. (2026). Revisiting the cry-for-help hypothesis in plant–microbe interactions. Trends Plant Sci. 31, 14–16. doi: 10.1016/j.tplants.2025.07.015 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Dabdoub S. (2016). Kraken-Biom: Enabling Interoperative Format Conversion for Kraken Results (Version 1.2). Available online at: https://github.com/smdabdoub/kraken-biom (Accessed August 10, 2022).
  15. Delgado-Baquerizo M., Oliverio A., Brewer T., Benavent-González A., Eldridge D., Bardgett R., et al. (2018). A global atlas of the dominant bacteria found in soil. Science 359, 320–325. doi: 10.1126/science.aap9516 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. D'Onofrio J. M., Crawford J. M., Stewart E. J., Witt K., Gavrish E., Epstein S. (2010). Siderophores from neighboring organisms promote the growth of uncultured bacteria. Che. Biol. 17, 254–264. doi: 10.1016/j.chembiol.2010.02.010 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Duan Y., Pang Z., Yin S., Xiao W., Hu H., Xie J. (2023). Screening and analysis of antifungal strains Bacillus subtilis JF-4 and B. amylum JF-5 for the biological control of Fusarium Wilt of Banana. J. Fungi. 9:886. doi: 10.3390/jof9090886 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. El-Sayed E. S. R., Mohamed S. S., Mousa S. A., Abo El Seoud M. A., Elmehlawy A. A., Abdou D. A. M. (2023) Bifunctional role of some biogenic nanoparticles in controlling wilt disease and promoting growth of common bean. AMB Expr 13:41 doi: 10.1186/s13568-023-01546-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Galagoda R., Chanto M., Takemura Y., Tomioka N., Syutsubo K., Honda R., et al. (2023). Quantitative 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing for comprehensive pathogenic bacterial tracking in a municipal wastewater treatment plant. ACS ES T Water 3, 923–933. doi: 10.1021/acsestwater.2c00349 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  20. Goulart M. C., Cueva-Yesquén L. G., Hidalgo Martinez K. J., Attili-Angelis D., Fantinatti-Garboggini F. (2019). Comparison of specific endophytic bacterial communities in different developmental stages of passiflora incarnata using culture-dependent and culture-independent analysis. Microbiol.Open 8:e896. doi: 10.1002/mbo3.896 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Gowtham H. G., Hariprasad P., Nayak S. C., Niranjana S. R. (2016). Application of rhizobacteria antagonistic to Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. lycopersici for the management of Fusarium wilt in tomato. Rhizosphere 2, 72–74. doi: 10.1016/j.rhisph.2016.07.008 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  22. Han X., Zhang X., Su M., Yang S., Feng S., Tian T., et al. (2025). Genotype-specific rhizosphere microbiome assembly and its impact on soybean (Glycine max (L.) Merr.) yield traits. Front. Sustain. Food Syst. 9:1518597. doi: 10.3389/fsufs.2025.1518597 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  23. He Z., Yuan C., Chen P., Rong Z., Peng T., Farooq T. H., et al. (2023). Soil microbial community composition and diversity analysis under different land use patterns in Taojia River Basin. Forests, 14:1004. doi: 10.3390/f14051004 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  24. Hjelmsø M. H., Hansen L. H., Bælum J., Feld L., Holbenm W. E., Jacobsen C. S. (2014). High-resolution melt analysis for rapid comparison of bacterial com-munity compositions. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 80, 3568–3575. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2006.11.030 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Hnini M., Aurag J. (2024). Prevalence, diversity and applications potential of nodules endophytic bacteria: a systematic review. Front. Microbiol. 15:1386742. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2024.1386742 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Horton N. J., Kleinman K. (2015). Using R and RStudio for Data Management, Statistical Analysis, and Graphics, 2nd Edn. Chapman and Hall/CRC. doi: 10.1201/b18151 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  27. Jackson M. L. (1973). Soil Chemical Analysis. New Delhi: Prentice Hall of India Pvt. Ltd. [Google Scholar]
  28. Khan N., Martínez-Hidalgo P., Ice T. A., Maymon M., Humm E. A., Nejat N., et al. (2018). Antifungal Activity of Bacillus Species Against Fusarium and analysis of the potential mechanisms used in biocontrol. Front. Microbiol. 9:2363. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2018.02363 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Kushwaha P., Srivastava R., Pandiyan K., Singh A., Chakdar H., Kashyap P. L., et al. (2021). Enhancement in Plant Growth and Zinc Biofortification of Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) by Bacillus altitudinis. J. Soil Sci. Plant Nutrit. 21, 922–935. doi: 10.1007/s42729-021-00411-5 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  30. Li C., Song J., Chen Q., Ge D., Li Q., Yang Y. (2024). ‘Whole-genome shotgun sequencing unravels the influence of environmental microbial co-infections on the treatment efficacy for severe pediatric infectious diseases. Front. Microbiol. 15:1308871. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2024.1308871 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Li J., Wang C., Liang W., Liu S. (2021). Rhizosphere microbiome: the emerging barrier in plant–pathogen interactions. Front. Microbiol. 12:772420. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2021.772420 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Lima H. S., Mancine N., Peruchi G. B., Francisco C. S., Wang N., de Souza R. S. C., et al. (2024). Microbial community of cultivated and uncultivated citrus rhizosphere microbiota in Brazil. Scientific Data 11:1294. doi: 10.1038/s41597-024-04141-y [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Ling N., Wang T., Kuzyakov Y. (2022). Rhizosphere bacteriome structure and functions, Nat. Commun. 13:836. doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-28448-9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Liu X., Wu X., Liang G., Zheng F., Zhang M., Li S. (2021). A global meta-analysis of the impacts of no-tillage on soil aggregation and aggregate-associated organic carbon. Land Degrada. Dev. 32, 5292–5305. doi: 10.1002/ldr.4109 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  35. Lu J., Breitwieser F. P., Thielen P., Salzberg S. L. (2017). Bracken: estimating species abundance in metagenomics data. PeerJ. Comput. Sci. 3:e104. doi: 10.7717/peerj-cs.104 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Lu J., Huang Y., Liu R., Liang Y., Zhang H., Shen N., et al. (2024). Antimicrobial mechanisms and antifungal activity of compounds generated by banana rhizosphere Pseudomonas aeruginosa Gxun-2 against fusarium oxysporum f. sp. cubense. Front. Microbiol. 15:1456847. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2024.1456847 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Lv H., He P., Zhao S. (2024). Optimized nitrogen fertilization promoted soil organic carbon accumulation by increasing microbial necromass carbon in potato continuous cropping field. Agronomy 14:307. doi: 10.3390/agronomy14020307 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  38. Mageshwaran V., Gupta R., Singh S., Sahu P. K., Singh U. B., Chakdar H., et al. (2022). Endophytic Bacillus subtilis antagonize soil-borne fungal pathogens and suppress wilt complex disease in chickpea plants (Cicer arietinum L.). Front. Microbiol. 13:994847. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2022.994847 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Mikulska P., Malinowska M., Ignacyk M., Szustowski P., Nowak J., Pesta K., et al. (2023). Ashwagandha (Withania somnifera)—Current research on the health-promoting activities: a narrative review. Pharmaceutics 15:1057. doi: 10.3390/pharmaceutics15041057 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Mishra S., Goyal D., Phurailatpam L. (2021). Targeted 16S rRNA gene and ITS2 amplicon sequencing of leaf and spike tissues of piper longum identifies new candidates for bioprospecting of bioactive compounds. Archives Microbiol. 203, 3851–3867. doi: 10.1007/s00203-021-02356-w [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Naylor D., DeGraaf S., Purdom E., Coleman-Derr D. (2017). Drought and host selection influence bacterial community dynamics in the grass root microbiome. ISME J. 11, 2691–2704. doi: 10.1038/ismej.2017.118 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Oliveira C., Shakiba E., North D., McGraw M., Ballard E., Barrett-D'Amico M., et al. (2022). 16S rRNA gene-based metagenomic analysis of rhizosphere soil bacteria in arkansas rice crop fields. Agronomy 12:222. doi: 10.3390/agronomy12010222 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Olsen S. R. (1954). Estimation of Available Phosphorus in Soils by Extraction with Sodium Bicarbonate. USDA Circular 939. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office. [Google Scholar]
  44. Pandey P., Dwivedi S., Jangir H., Lal K., Srivastava J., Jhang T. (2024). Delineating Ashwagandha (Withania somnifera (L.) Dunal varieties in Indian commerce using seed morphometric, quality and spermoderm pattern traits: combating seed adulteration. Ind. Crops Prod. 222:119651. doi: 10.1016/j.indcrop.2024.119651 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  45. Park I., Seo Y. S., Mannaa M. (2023). ‘Recruitment of the rhizo-microbiome army: assembly determinants and engineering of the rhizosphere microbiome as a key to unlocking plant potential. Front. Microbiol. 14:1163832. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2023.1163832 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Patel M., Islam S., Husain F. M., Yadav V. K., Park H. K., Yadav K. K., et al. (2023). Bacillus subtilis ER-08, a multifunctional plant growth-promoting rhizobacterium, promotes the growth of fenugreek (Trigonella foenum-graecum L.) plants under salt and drought stress. Front. Microbiol. 14:1208743. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2023.1208743 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Paul S., Chakraborty S., Anand U., Dey S., Nandy S., Ghorai M., et al. (2021). Withania somnifera (L.) Dunal (Ashwagandha): a comprehensive review on ethnopharmacology, pharmacotherapeutics, biomedicinal and toxicological aspects. Biomed. Pharmacother. 143:112175. doi: 10.1016/j.biopha.2021.112175 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Prommer J., Walker T. W., Wanek W., Braun J., Zezula D., Hu Y., et al. (2020). Increased microbial growth, biomass, and turnover drive soil organic carbon accumulation at higher plant diversity. Global Change Biol. 26:669–681. doi: 10.1111/gcb.14777 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Saran P.L., Sarkar R., Kalariya K.A. (2025a). Can available potash mitigate the root quality of Withania somnifera L. Dunal under the arid phytogeographic region. Vegetos 1–10. doi: 10.1007/s42535-025-01204-2 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  50. Saran P. L., Das M. (2023). Nagori ashwagandha: a viable alternative crop for arid ecosystem. Indian Hortic. 68, 22–24. Available online at: https://epubs.icar.org.in/index.php/IndHort/article/view/144770 (Accessed Auguts 13, 2025). [Google Scholar]
  51. Saran P. L., Kumar S., Sarkar R., Kalariya K. A., Reddy R. N., Das M. (2025b). Identification of elite accession of Ashwagandha (Withania somnifera L. Dunal) for root yield and brittleness. Ind. Crops Prod. 223:120161. doi: 10.1016/j.indcrop.2024.120161 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  52. Sengupta P., Agarwal A., Pogrebetskaya M., Roychoudhury S., Durairajanayagam D., Henkel R. (2018). Role of Withania somnifera (Ashwagandha) in the management of male infertility. Reprod. Biomed. Online 3, 311–326. doi: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2017.11.007 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Sharma S., Kumar P., Salvi K., Hasan A. (2023). Evaluation of soil fertility and physico-chemical properties of the semi-arid region of Eastern Jaipur Rajasthan, India. Int. J. Plant Soil Sci. 35, 584–591. doi: 10.9734/ijpss/2023/v35i183323 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  54. Shinde S., Balasubramaniam A. K., Mulay V., Saste G., Girme A., Hingorani L. (2023). Recent advancements in extraction techniques of Ashwagandha (Withania somnifera) with insights on phytochemicals, structural significance, pharmacology, and current trends in food applications. ACS Omega 8, 40982–41003. doi: 10.1021/acsomega.3c03491 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Shreedevasena S., Bagul S. Y., Divija S. D., Das M. (2025). Disease Catalogue of Medicinal and Aromatic Plants of India. ICAR-Directorate of Medicinal and Aromatic Plants Research. Gujarat, India: Anand Press. 34p. [Google Scholar]
  56. Singh A., Kumar M., Chakdar H., Pandiyan K., Kumar S. C., Zeyad M. T., et al. (2022). ‘Influence of host genotype in establishing root associated microbiome of indica rice cultivars for plant growth promotion. Front. Microbiol. 13:1033158. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2022.1033158 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. Sprengel M., Laskowski R., Jost Z. (2025). Withania somnifera (Ashwagandha: ) supplementation: a review of its mechanisms, health benefits, and role in sports performance, Nutrition Metab. Clin. Exp. 22:9. doi: 10.1186/s12986-025-00902-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. Steinberger Y., Doniger T., Sherman C., Jeyaraman M., Applebaum I. (2024). Soil bacterial community of medicinal plant rhizosphere in a Mediterranean system. Agriculture 14:664. doi: 10.3390/agriculture14050664 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  59. Subbiah B. V., Asija G. L. (1956). A rapid procedure for the estimation of available nitrogen in soils. Curr. Sci. 25:259. [Google Scholar]
  60. Sutherland J., Bell T., Trexler R. V., Carlson J. E., Lasky J. R. (2022). Host genomic influence on bacterial composition in the switchgrass rhizosphere. Mol. Ecol. 31, 3934–3950. doi: 10.1111/mec.16549 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  61. Thakur S. S., González S. S., Suravajhala P., Jain S. K., Yadav S., Narayan K. S., et al. (2025). Metagenomic insights of microbial functions under conventional and conservation agriculture. World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 41, 1–18. doi: 10.1007/s11274-025-04312-y [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  62. Thakur S. S., Lone A. R., Yellaboina S., Tambat S., Yadav A. N., Jain S. K., et al. (2022). Metagenomic insights into the gut microbiota of Eudrilus eugeniae (Kinberg) and its potential roles in agroecosystem. Curr. Microbiol. 79:295. doi: 10.1007/s00284-022-02988-1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  63. Walkley A. J., Black I. A. (1934). Estimation of soil organic carbon by the chromic acid titration method. Soil Sci. 37, 29–38. doi: 10.1097/00010694-193401000-00003 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  64. Wang M., Lei M., He H. (2023). Catalog of operational taxonomic units and unified amplicon sequencing data for the microbiomes of medicinal plant roots. Eng. Life Sci. Microbiol. 3:100087. doi: 10.1016/j.engmic.2023.100087 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  65. Wang Y., Cao X., Zeng J., Li H., Zhao D., Wu Q. (2020). Distinct shifts in bacterioplankton community composition and functional gene structure between macrophyte- and phytoplankton-dominated regimes in a large shallow lake. Limnol. Oceanogr. 65, S208–S219. doi: 10.1002/lno.11373 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  66. Wiseschart A., Mhuantong W., Tangphatsornruang S., Chantasingh D., Pootanakit K. (2019). Shotgun metagenomic sequencing from Manao-Pee cave, Thailand, reveals insight into the microbial community structure and its metabolic potential. BMC Microbiol. 19, 1–14. doi: 10.1186/s12866-019-1521-8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  67. Wood D. E., Lu J., Langmead B. (2019). Improved metagenomic analysis with Kraken2′, Genome Biol. 20, 257. doi: 10.1186/s13059-019-1891-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  68. Yue H., Sun X., Wang T., Zhang A., Han D., Wei G., et al. (2024). Host genotype-specific rhizosphere fungus enhances drought resistance in wheat. Microbiome 12:44. doi: 10.1186/s40168-024-01770-8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  69. Zhang J., Liu P., Nie B., Liu X., Zhang Z., He R., et al. (2022). Effects of genotype and ecological environment on the community structure and function of symbiotic bacteria in rhizosphere of ginseng. BMC Microbiol. 22:235. doi: 10.1186/s12866-022-02649-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  70. Zhang X., Yang S., Yu J., Liu X., Tang X., Wang L., et al. (2025). Integrated amplicon sequencing and transcriptomic sequencing technology reveals changes in the bacterial community and gene expression in the rhizosphere soil of Asparagus cochinchinensis. Med. Plant Biol. 4:e003. doi: 10.48130/mpb-0025-0001 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  71. Zhang Y., Jiang W., Li Q., Xu W., Wang J., Hu J., et al. (2021). ‘Soil nutrient levels determine the variation of bacterial communities in the rhizosphere of rice under different conditions of climate and genotype. Appl. Soil Ecol. 167:104025. doi: 10.1016/j.apsoil.2021.104025 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  72. Zheng Q., Li Y., Xu W., Chen W., Hu Y., Wang Z. (2023). Different genotypes regulate the microbial community structure in the soybean rhizosphere. J. Integr. Agric. 22, 585–597. doi: 10.1016/j.jia.2022.08.010 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  73. Zhu W., Liu J., Li Q., Gu P., Gu X., Wu L., et al. (2022). Effects of nutrient levels on microbial diversity in sediments of a eutrophic shallow lake. Front. Ecol. Evol. 10:909983. doi: 10.3389/fevo.2022.909983 [DOI] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Table_1.DOCX (3.5MB, DOCX)

Data Availability Statement

The datasets presented in this study can be found in online repositories. The names of the repository/repositories and accession number(s) can be found in the article/Supplementary material.


Articles from Frontiers in Microbiology are provided here courtesy of Frontiers Media SA

RESOURCES