Abstract
Pulmonary nocardiosis, a rare and diagnostically challenging infection, usually presents with heterogeneous radiographic findings, compounded by the low sensitivity of traditional confirmatory cultures. In their most recent work, Wang et al analyzed 102 patients with pulmonary nocardiosis to address these concerns, investigating species-characteristic imaging patterns, pathological associations, and the role of metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS) in the diagnostic approach. High-resolution computed tomography (CT) in adult patients with pulmonary infections caused by Nocardia wallacei was demonstrated to have a sensitive (85.71%) and specific (83.34%) presentation of bronchopneumonia in relation to the five Nocardia species in the sample with CT data. The authors also compared traditional cultures to mNGS, finding that traditional cultures and mNGS were concordantly positive in only 3.3% of cases. This letter supports a combined radiologic and molecular diagnostic approach, enabling earlier and more accurate species identification in pulmonary nocardiosis, thereby informing treatment decisions, and enhancing epidemiologic understanding.
Keywords: Bacterial cultures, Chest computed tomography, Metagenomic next-generation sequencing, Nocardia, Pulmonary nocardiosis, Radiographic presentation
Core Tip: The current understanding of pulmonary nocardiosis as presenting with heterogeneous computed tomography (CT) findings is changing, as in their recent work, Wang et al recently suggested a potential role for radiology in species-level diagnosis. By integrating high-resolution CT and molecular-based diagnostics, the authors provide evidence for a two-step diagnostic workflow for species identification in pulmonary nocardiosis, using imaging to rapidly build species-level suspicion followed by confirmation with metagenomic next-generation sequencing.
TO THE EDITOR
We read with great interest the high-quality article by Wang et al[1] recently published in the World Journal of Radiology. In retrospectively analyzing 102 patients with pulmonary nocardiosis, the authors further our collective understanding of the radiographic features, common co-infections, and associations of pulmonary nocardiosis, all while demonstrating the importance of metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS) diagnostics in this disease. Furthermore, by systematically comparing imaging manifestations across different Nocardia species, this study found a species-specific and sensitive computed tomography (CT) chest presentation for Nocardia wallacei (N. wallacei), as bronchopneumonia, spurring the need for further investigation into this and other species-characteristic imagery presentations. In this letter, we aim to contextualize the authors’ findings within the evolving landscape of radiology and microbiological diagnosis of pulmonary nocardiosis, with emphasis on the implications of identifying species-specific imaging features, the limitations of conventional culture-based confirmation, and the potential impact of mNGS on both diagnostic practice and epidemiologic understanding of Nocardia infections.
Radiographic patterns in pulmonary nocardiosis
Previous literature described pulmonary nocardiosis as radiographically heterogeneous, commonly presenting with consolidation, nodules, cavitation, and pleural effusion, without reliable species-level distinctions with imaging alone[2,3]. However, Wang et al[1] in their recent work, have identified a unique CT presentation of a relatively rare species of Nocardia, N. wallacei, as bronchopneumonia without cavitation. Specifically, the authors found that of the seven patients in their sample with N. wallacei, six presented with bronchopneumonia and none with cavitation. To our knowledge, this finding represents the first such multi-patient report of species-level distinction of Nocardia species on CT alone. It is important to recognize that bronchopneumonia is also a rare but possible finding present in pulmonary nocardiosis caused by Nocardia species other than N. wallacei. Despite this, when using the authors’ data, the finding of bronchopneumonia is both sensitive (85.71%) and specific (83.34%) at discriminating N. wallacei from other species in patients with pulmonary nocardiosis within the sample of five species with CT data when considering cases caused by species other than N. wallacei as “negatives”. These findings are promising but are limited by the commonality of coinfections in pulmonary nocardiosis, previously reported at 21%, which can mask or complicate radiographic findings[4]. This challenge is heightened by the fact that pulmonary nocardiosis is more common in immunocompromised hosts, in which cytomegalovirus, Aspergillus spp., and Pneumocystis jirovecii, among others, are common co-infections[5,6]. Furthermore, several other causes of pulmonary disease besides Nocardia species present similarly to this proposed pattern. Pulmonary infections with Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Staphylococcus aureus, Haemophilus influenzae, Actinomyces israelii, Aspergillus spp., Mycobacterium tuberculosis, and the Mycobacterium avium complex pathogens are all known to possibly present with similar CT findings of bronchopneumonia[7,8]. Even when limited to Nocardia spp. caused pulmonary disease, 35 species are known to cause pulmonary nocardiosis, and no prior studies have characterized or compared the prevalence of different CT findings across all species[9]. These observations underscore the reality that CT alone is limited in absolute diagnostic specificity when used in isolation, as each patient will present at a varying stage of disease and with varying immune status, which influences the radiographic presentation[2,10,11]. The work by Wang et al[1], comparing the features of nine species thus represents a strong first step toward understanding the radiographic presentation of specific Nocardia species, with gaps that require additional confirmatory testing in the diagnosis of pulmonary nocardiosis and potential causative species.
Clinical implications of Nocardia species differentiation and the role of molecular diagnostics
The ability to differentiate species can influence treatment and prognosis prediction. For instance, the largest meta-analysis to date on nocardiosis found that infections with specific species can have significantly different mortality rates: 26.6% and 23.4% for Nocardia asteroides and Nocardia farcinica, respectively, compared to 1.6% for N. wallacei[12]. Another study also found that species influences drug resistance, with 2.3% of N. farcinica being resistant to the first-line treatment of TMP-SMX[13]. These findings highlight the importance of the authors’ work, as they suggest that radiology can play a role in identifying the causative species in pulmonary nocardiosis at the point of care before molecular-based diagnostic results are returned. Current molecular-based diagnostics, such as mNGS, have an average turnaround time of 48 hours, excluding delivery, underscoring the need for rapid imaging-based diagnosis, especially in remote hospitals and clinics[14]. Although slower than radiographic evaluation, molecular-based diagnostics still play a crucial role. Confirmatory testing is required for diagnosis in pulmonary nocardiosis, regardless of clinical and radiographic presentation, and traditional cultures are much slower. One report found that the turnaround time for traditional cultures was 7.5 ± 1.92 days, and another found that the speed of diagnosis greatly influenced patient outcomes[15,16]. Adding to this, one of the more surprising findings in the article by Wang et al[1] is that traditional cultures had very low sensitivity, detecting only 3.3% of those diagnosed using mNGS in this paper. Similar reports have previously found sensitivity of traditional cultures ranging from 36.84% to 66.67% compared to mNGS in pulmonary nocardiosis. Still, none, to our knowledge, have reported rates quite so low[4,15,17]. This finding by Wang et al[1] strongly supports the use of molecular diagnostics, such as mNGS, for confirming pulmonary nocardiosis rather than cultures. An added benefit of mNGS is that, by sequencing all RNA and DNA within a sample in a non-targeted manner, it is ideal for identifying the specific causative Nocardia species, as well as other species or pathogens present[4]. That level of detail, in combination with improved species-level discrimination via CT, as the work by Wang et al[1] has set forth, can provide a two-step diagnostic workflow for identifying the causative species in pulmonary nocardiosis. Furthermore, mNGS paired with CT imaging would address the limitations of CT for species identification posed by coinfections, which complicate radiographic findings.
Epidemiologic insights from molecular diagnostics
The latest research by Wang et al[1] demonstrates another use case for mNGS in providing insights into the epidemiology of pulmonary nocardiosis. By enabling highly specific and sensitive species identification, mNGS can characterize the relative prevalence of Nocardia species. The authors report Nocardia gelsenkin (N. gelsenkin) as the most common Nocardia species in their sample of pulmonary infections. However, upon searching the literature, the N. gelsenkin species has not previously been described. Elsewhere in the paper, they mention Nocardia gelsenkirchenensis (N. gelsenkirchenensis), which also does not belong to a valid species of Nocardia and can be presumed to refer to the same species (N. gelsenkin) discussed previously. Based on the available information, we believe the name N. gelsenkirchenensis may refer to Nocardia cyriacigeorgici (N. cyriacigeorgici), which was first isolated in the German town of Gelsenkirchen and described by Yassin et al[18]. After changing the names as described, Wang et al[1] would have found N. cyriacigeorgici (22%) to be the most common, followed by Nocardia abscessus (14%) and N. farcinica (12%), the three most common in China, where the study was conducted[13]. While similar epidemiological data have previously been collected in this manner, the authors build on this idea, using mNGS to characterize the prevalence of common coinfections in patients with pulmonary nocardiosis and bronchiectasis. The authors found Aspergillus to be the most common within their sample, which, in this context, has previously been described as a rare co-infection with Nocardia cyriacigeorgica[19]. The authors’ findings are in line with the shared risk factor between pulmonary nocardiosis and Aspergillus, namely bronchiectasis, and provide further evidence for an association previously reported only sparingly[19-21].
Conclusion
The most recent work done by Wang et al[1] meaningfully advances the diagnostic understanding of pulmonary nocardiosis by demonstrating the potential for species-specific CT patterns and common associations via mNGS. The authors’ findings suggest a potential complementary two-step diagnostic framework in which imaging, with fast turnaround, raises species-level suspicion, and molecular diagnostics, such as mNGS, provide later definitive confirmation. With further research into this area with larger sample sizes, these approaches may enable earlier, more accurate diagnosis, refine epidemiologic knowledge, and ultimately improve clinical outcomes in pulmonary nocardiosis.
Footnotes
Conflict-of-interest statement: The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
Peer review: Externally peer reviewed.
Peer-review model: Single blind
Specialty type: Radiology, nuclear medicine and medical imaging
Country of origin: United States
Peer-review report’s classification
Scientific quality: Grade B
Novelty: Grade B
Creativity or innovation: Grade C
Scientific significance: Grade C
P-Reviewer: Nagoba B, PhD, Professor, India S-Editor: Lin C L-Editor: A P-Editor: Lei YY
Contributor Information
John Halphen, Jr, Department of Radiology, Section of Interventional Radiology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030, United States.
Mohadese Ahmadzade, Department of Radiology, Section of Interventional Radiology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030, United States.
Babith Mankidy, Department of Pulmonary, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030, United States.
Ashkan Berenji, Department of Radiology, Section of Interventional Radiology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030, United States.
Mohammad Ghasemi-Rad, Department of Radiology, Section of Interventional Radiology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030, United States. mohammad.ghasemirad@bcm.edu.
References
- 1.Wang HJ, Zhang YN, An L. Clinical and radiographic feature of pulmonary nocardiosis: A study of 102 cases. World J Radiol. 2026;18:114552. doi: 10.4329/wjr.v18.i1.114552. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Lee HN, Do KH, Kim EY, Choe J, Sung H, Choi SH, Kim HJ. Comparative Analysis of CT Findings and Clinical Outcomes in Adult Patients With Disseminated and Localized Pulmonary Nocardiosis. J Korean Med Sci. 2024;39:e107. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2024.39.e107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Martínez R, Reyes S, Menéndez R. Pulmonary nocardiosis: risk factors, clinical features, diagnosis and prognosis. Curr Opin Pulm Med. 2008;14:219–227. doi: 10.1097/MCP.0b013e3282f85dd3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Chen Y, Fu H, Zhu Q, Ren Y, Liu J, Wu Y, Xu J. Clinical Features of Pulmonary Nocardiosis and Diagnostic Value of Metagenomic Next-Generation Sequencing: A Retrospective Study. Pathogens. 2025;14:656. doi: 10.3390/pathogens14070656. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Steinbrink J, Leavens J, Kauffman CA, Miceli MH. Manifestations and outcomes of nocardia infections: Comparison of immunocompromised and nonimmunocompromised adult patients. Medicine (Baltimore) 2018;97:e12436. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000012436. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Wang L, Xu Y, Chen Z, Jiang W, Xiao X, Shen Y, Ye Y. Corrigendum: Nocardiosis: A two-center analysis of clinical characteristics. Front Med (Lausanne) 2023;10:1143851. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2023.1143851. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Miller WT Jr, Panosian JS. Causes and imaging patterns of tree-in-bud opacities. Chest. 2013;144:1883–1892. doi: 10.1378/chest.13-1270. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Franquet T, Müller NL, Giménez A, Guembe P, de La Torre J, Bagué S. Spectrum of pulmonary aspergillosis: histologic, clinical, and radiologic findings. Radiographics. 2001;21:825–837. doi: 10.1148/radiographics.21.4.g01jl03825. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Conville PS, Brown-Elliott BA, Smith T, Zelazny AM. The Complexities of Nocardia Taxonomy and Identification. J Clin Microbiol. 2018;56:e01419–e01417. doi: 10.1128/JCM.01419-17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Su R, Wen Y, Liufu Y, Pan X, Guan Y. The Computed Tomography Findings and Follow-up Course of Pulmonary Nocardiosis. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2023;47:418–423. doi: 10.1097/RCT.0000000000001439. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Chen J, Zhou H, Xu P, Zhang P, Ma S, Zhou J. Clinical and radiographic characteristics of pulmonary nocardiosis: clues to earlier diagnosis. PLoS One. 2014;9:e90724. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0090724. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Du B, Song Z, Ren Z, Tang D, Shen J, Yao J, Qiu X, Xu S, Yuan M, Liu Z, Li Z. The global epidemiology, risk factors, and mortality prediction of nocardiosis: an easily missed opportunistic infection. Sci Rep. 2025;15:42090. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-26244-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Wang H, Zhu Y, Cui Q, Wu W, Li G, Chen D, Xiang L, Qu J, Shi D, Lu B. Epidemiology and Antimicrobial Resistance Profiles of the Nocardia Species in China, 2009 to 2021. Microbiol Spectr. 2022;10:e0156021. doi: 10.1128/spectrum.01560-21. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Simner PJ, Miller S, Carroll KC. Understanding the Promises and Hurdles of Metagenomic Next-Generation Sequencing as a Diagnostic Tool for Infectious Diseases. Clin Infect Dis. 2018;66:778–788. doi: 10.1093/cid/cix881. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Weng SS, Zhang HY, Ai JW, Gao Y, Liu YY, Xu B, Zhang WH. Rapid Detection of Nocardia by Next-Generation Sequencing. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2020;10:13. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2020.00013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Liu P, Wang Z, Jian Z, Liu X, Li Y, Yan Q, Zhong B, Liao M, Liang X, Liu W. The Clinical Characteristic and Management of Patients with Nocardiosis in a Tertiary Hospital in China. J Microbiol Biotechnol. 2023;33:574–581. doi: 10.4014/jmb.2209.09034. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Gao L, Yang T, Zhang X, Lei W, Huang JA. Rapid detection of pulmonary nocardiosis by metagenomic next generation sequencing. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2023;106:115928. doi: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2023.115928. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Yassin AF, Rainey FA, Steiner U. Nocardia cyriacigeorgici sp. nov. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2001;51:1419–1423. doi: 10.1099/00207713-51-4-1419. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Ye J, Li Y, Hao J, Song M, Guo Y, Gao W, Zheng C, Huang Y, Feng Z, Zhang L. Rare occurrence of pulmonary coinfection involving Aspergillus fumigatus and Nocardia cyriacigeorgica in immunocompetent patients based on NGS: A case report and literature review. Medicine (Baltimore) 2023;102:e36692. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000036692. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Yang B, Kim T, Ryu J, Park HY, Hwangbo B, Kong SY, Kwon YS, Lee SJ, Ra SW, Oh YM, Sohn JW, Choe KH, Choi H, Lee H. Increased Incidence and Associated Risk Factors of Aspergillosis in Patients with Bronchiectasis. J Pers Med. 2021;11:422. doi: 10.3390/jpm11050422. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Chen LD, Li HY, Xie JJ, Hu MF, Chen XX, Cai ZM, Lin L, Zhang XB, Chen GP, Liu KX. Clinical characteristics and outcome analysis of pulmonary nocardiosis in southern China: a two-center retrospective study. BMC Infect Dis. 2024;24:1073. doi: 10.1186/s12879-024-09933-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
