Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2026 Apr 4.
Published in final edited form as: CNS Neurol Disord Drug Targets. 2024;23(7):906–916. doi: 10.2174/1871527323666230817102125

Neuroprotection or sex bias; A protective response to traumatic brain injury in the females

Mohammad I Yatoo 1,$, Ghaith A Bahader 2,$, Shafayat A Beigh 1, Adil M Khan 1, Antonisamy William James 2, Maleha R Asmi 2, Zahoor A Shah 2,*
PMCID: PMC13047639  NIHMSID: NIHMS2154472  PMID: 37592792

Abstract

Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is a major healthcare problem and a common cause of mortality and morbidity. Clinical and preclinical research suggests sex-related differences in short- and long-term outcomes following TBI; however, males have been the main focus of TBI research. Females show a protective response against TBI. Female animals in preclinical studies and women in clinical trials have shown comparatively better outcomes against mild, moderate, or severe TBI. This reflects a favorable protective nature of the females compared to the males, primarily attributed to various protective mechanisms that provide better prognosis and recovery in the females after TBI. Understanding the sex difference in the TBI pathophysiology and the underlying mechanisms remains an elusive goal. In this review, we provide insights into various mechanisms related to the anatomical, physiological, hormonal, enzymatic, inflammatory, oxidative, genetic, or mitochondrial basis that support the protective nature of females compared to males. Furthermore, we sought to outline the evidence of multiple biomarkers that are highly potential in the investigation of TBI’s prognosis, pathophysiology, and treatment and which can serve as objective measures and novel targets for individualized therapeutic interventions in TBI treatment. Implementations from this review are important for the understanding of the effect of sex on TBI outcomes and possible mechanisms behind the favorable response in females. It also emphasizes the critical need to include female as a biological variable and in sufficient numbers in future TBI studies.

Keywords: Traumatic brain injury, Biomarkers, Female, Sex differences, Protective Response

1. Introduction

Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is the leading cause of disability and death [1,2]. Globally 50 million people suffer TBI annually, and about 50% of the global population will suffer a TBI in their lifetime [3]. In the USA, 1.7 million people suffer TBI annually, and 5 million live with TBI-related complications, costing a healthcare cost of $60 to $221 billion annually [4,5]. Of the reported studies, around 80% of cases are mild TBI, with only 7% being based on sex differences as a variable, while 93% of those studies have only focused on males [6,7]. Male rodents have been predominantly used in preclinical studies [6]. Likewise, women are less likely to be included in clinical trials than men partly because TBI has a greater incidence in men than in women [5]. Thus, there is a sex-based bias denoted by the under-representation of females in these reports [8], which creates a critical need to include females as a biological variable in TBI-related studies [5].

The pathophysiology of TBI is complicated and is classified into primary and secondary brain injury [9]. The acute primary injury results from the initial mechanical insult and based on the severity, it can lead to focal or diffuse injury. Axonal and blood vasculature damage are primary brain insult hallmark features and can result in cognitive and behavioral deficits [10]. The pathophysiological cascades of the primary injury often progress into the delayed, degenerative, and prolonged secondary injury that can remain up to days, weeks, and even years after the injury [11]. Mechanistically, several biochemical, cellular, and molecular pathways mediate secondary brain injury. Multiple mechanisms are responsible for neuronal damage, including neuroinflammatory, oxidative stress, excitotoxicity, axonal degeneration, lipid peroxidation, mitochondrial dysfunction, and apoptotic cell death [12]. Manipulating the different factors involved in these mechanisms is considered a major therapeutic strategy to improve recovery and enhance functional outcomes following TBI [13].

Many studies predict that females perform better in prognosis and outcomes and have fewer complications following TBI than males [14]. However, there are quite a few sex-based variations in response and recovery to TBI in animals and humans [5,15]. Studies on moderate to severe TBI have revealed that females show comparatively better outcomes than males [5]. However, mild TBI studies based on subjective outcome measures have demonstrated better outcomes for females in preclinical TBI studies and worse outcomes for women in human clinical TBI studies [5,16]. As subjective measures are usually biased, including more objective measures may reveal more reliable outcomes [17,18]. A close analysis of clinical and preclinical studies shows similar trends, with females having better prospects. Concerning clinical studies, analysis of human studies showed that sample size distribution has a significant effect on sex-related outcomes [5]. In this context, 53% of studies with small sample sizes (less than 1000 patients) showed worse outcomes in women than men; however, that was reversed in studies with large sample sizes (more than 10,000 patients), where 67% of the studies described better outcomes in women than men [5]. In agreement with this evidence, sex-based differences have also been reported in other neurodegenerative diseases, such as multiple sclerosis [19]. Compared to women, multiple sclerosis in men have a worse prognosis, as demonstrated by poor relapse recovery, greater brain volume loss, and higher disability rates and cognitive dysfunctions [20,21].

Although the mechanisms behind TBI-related sex differences are not fully understood, sex-related physiological differences have confirmed that females have underlying protective mechanisms that might be responsible for providing them with better outcomes. The available literature hints at various morphological, cellular, and molecular basis of these mechanisms in females [14,15]. Studies have reported that females undergo reduced neuroinflammation compared to males after TBI, which suggests neuroprotection in females [22]. Hormonal differences play a major role in the neuroprotective effects observed in animal models of TBI [23]. Studies have shown that estrogen and progesterone, two essential hormones found primarily in women, have protective properties that help protect neurons from damage caused by TBI [24]. These hormones reduce inflammation and promote neuronal survival [24]. In addition, estrogen and progesterone can potentially improve cognitive function after TBI [25]. In this review, we have explored anatomical, physiological/biochemical [8,14], hormonal [26–28], enzymatic [28–31], anti-inflammatory [14,32,33], antioxidant [34–36], genetic [14,27,37] or mitochondrial [38,39] basis for protective mechanisms of females in comparison to males. However, considering the scarcity of literature on female sex-based studies, comparative evaluations, and contradictory revelations, there should be a future emphasis on including females as a biological variable in TBI studies to reveal the relevance of various findings. Further, this review details multiple markers/measures that can be objectively estimated to better interpret sex differences in TBI studies. It will also give insights on potential targets for developing therapeutic interventions for treating TBI.

2. Potential protective mechanisms

There is a morphological, cellular, and molecular basis of response to TBI in both males and females. However, due to the lack of research involving morphological, cellular, and subcellular criteria with sufficient sex-based numbers, sex differences in TBI studies are still not fully understood. To explore the differences in response or protective mechanisms, we summarized the available literature about sex-based responses to TBI and the factors that regulate these differences directly or indirectly. We came across various studies that provide anatomical, physiological/biochemical [5,8], pathobiological [15,40], hormonal [26,27], enzymatic [15,29,31], anti-inflammatory [14,32], antioxidant [34,35], genetic [37,41] and mitochondrial [36,38] basis of sex difference in protective response against TBI. There are interrelationships between these mechanisms and interdependence on one another. A structure (such as the blood-brain barrier (BBB) and mitochondria) may have anatomical, physio-biochemical, or pathobiological relevance to providing a protective response against TBI. Hence, it has been discussed under different headings with the relevant information. We also outlined all the possible limitations in these comparisons and the need for future explorations of sex-based TBI-related studies.

2.1. Anatomical/morphological response

There are subtle structural and functional differences in different parts of the brain of males and females that may have a bearing on disagreements in TBI outcomes [42]. Post-trauma variations in anatomy have been reported with larger volume and surface area of the insula’s anterior circular sulcus in males than in females with post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) [43]. Less damage in females than males on similar TBI has been reported [44]. Higher blood-brain barrier (BBB) disruption in males compared to females after TBI also reflects sex-based differences [44,45]. Differences in anatomy can cause discrepancies in circulating biomarkers after injury [8]. Smaller diameter axons in females may be associated with increased vulnerability to shear deformation [46]. Sex-based variations in cellular infiltration or response (macrophages and microglia), which have been reported, can also determine different post-TBI outcomes in males and females [47].

2.2. Physiological/Biochemical response

There are diverse post-trauma physiological/biochemical alterations that are sex-based. These alterations may provide a more favorable response to females. Post-traumatic brain edema and hyperthermia, the most critical prognosticator of impairment, affect males more than females [15]. Hypoperfusion is sex-specific and is another prominent indicator of TBI severity [48]. Better BBB integrity and delayed edema formation have been reported in females post-TBI [49]. Novel techniques, including “BBB on a chip”, neuroimaging or intravenous tracers, can elucidate BBB physiology and functions in normal and TBI-affected patients and can be explored to evaluate sex-based variations [50]. In females, dysfunction of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis post-TBI occurs by improper regulation of pre-autonomic neurons.

In contrast, in males, it is due to the disruption of limbic pathways [51]. Sex variations in methionine metabolism, an essential proteinogenic amino acid that regulates many cellular functions, have been reported [52]. Estrogen and progesterone in females provide neuroprotection against cranial edema, pressure, and perfusion during trauma [53]. Similarly, modification of cellular pathophysiological responses, like microglia activation, can favor females, as a deteriorated response in males has been previously reported [22,54]. Alteration of mitochondrial physiology and the subsequent mitochondrial dysfunction post-TBI has a greater effect in males than females, further aiding poor outcomes following TBI in males [5,55]. So, there are physiological mechanisms underlying the different sex-based responses to TBI.

2.3. Pathobiological response

There are sex differences in pathobiological mechanisms initiated after TBI [15]. These are related to the injury-recovery processes. TBI-induced edema occurs more in males than in females [45,56]. This is attributed to the protective effect of hormones (estrogen, progesterone) in females or changes in BBB [15,57]. Sex differences in the BBB permeability in rodent models of TBI have been reported with more permeability in males than females [40,58]. Hyperthermia following TBI occurs more in males than females [59]. Another protective mechanism is less hypoperfusion in females than males [15,48]. This may be due to more arterial constriction in males following TBI than in females [60]. Vasoconstriction or dilation is found to be related to arterial K channel response [60,61] and expression of endothelin-1 (ET-1) [62] following TBI, with females showing better compliance [63,64]. Additionally, increased endothelial activation and expression of β-catenin in males post-injury is reported [65].

Females have mostly a protective advantage over males when considering numerous pathological features such as lesion size, cell death, and recovery/neurogenesis, with few aspects being related to the model used [15]. The smaller size of the brain lesion and lower mortality on similar TBI models in females compared to males is reported. In this context, females exhibited numerous protective mechanisms, including hormonal, anti-apoptotic, or regional regenerative capability [22,66,67]. Progesterone is reduced to its metabolites locally during brain injury, which plays a role in recovery [68]. Upregulation of the X-linked inhibitor of apoptosis (XIAP) [69] and reduced expression of caspase-3 [70] in females compared to males is considered a protective mechanism against cell death following TBI. Furthermore, cytoskeletal protein degradation and neurodegeneration occur rapidly in males compared to females after TBI [15].

2.4. Hormonal response

Hormones play an essential role in female response against TBI, with various hormones having been reported to provide a protective function through different mechanisms [14,27]. Steroid hormones like estrogen [71] and progesterone [72] are considered as main sex-specific mechanisms that protect females compared to males against TBI [73]. Other hormones having a notable role in TBI response include prolactin [74], cortisol [75], thyroid hormones, and thyroid stimulating hormone [76]. Dopamine [77,78] and growth hormone [79] have also shown alterations in post-traumatic brain injury; however, their role in TBI response is yet to be thoroughly investigated.

2.4.1. Estrogen

Estrogen provides neuroprotection to females through multiple mechanisms [71]. It promotes neurogenesis and neuronal recovery by attenuating neurite outgrowth and glial activity [80,81]. Following TBI, it prevents inflammatory cascade [82], apoptosis [83], and oxidative stress [84]. Estrogen decreases injury-induced neuroinflammation and increases cell survival and neuroprotection [81]. Moreover, estrogen helps reduce glutamate concentrations that are elevated due to trauma, thus preventing cellular excitotoxicity [24]. In this paradigm, it increases the expression of the astrocytic glutamate uptake transporters GLAST (glutamate and aspartate transporters) and GLT-1 (glutamate transporter) that mediate the reduction of glutamate concentrations in the brain [85,86]. Besides, estrogen enhances mitochondrial biogenesis, function, and oxidative protection through upregulation of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-γ coactivator-1 beta (PGC-1β and/or PGC-1 related coactivator (PRC) [87].

2.4.2. Progesterone

Numerous mechanisms of progesterone protective response against TBI in females have been elucidated. Studies have shown that progesterone is involved in various pathways during TBI-induced primary and secondary brain damage [88]. In this context, progesterone prevents cerebral edema formation and BBB disruption[89], reduces neuroinflammation [90] and oxidative stress [88] and prevents demyelination [91]. It helps to regulate fluid and ion exchange through water channel proteins aquaporins and stabilize the BBB [92]. Furthermore, It regulates the synthesis of p-glycoproteins which are protein transporters associated with expulsing free radicals and inflammatory mediators [92]. Progesterone suppresses the synthesis of proinflammatory mediators like tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α), interleukin (IL) 1 (IL-1), and IL-6 and influences the anti-inflammatory cytokines like transforming growth factor beta (TGF-β) [14], thus preventing the inflammatory cascade [93]. Moreover, progesterone suppresses the expression of inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS) and cyclooxygenase 2 (COX-2) and subsequently prevents oxidative disturbance [94]. The suppression of activated NF-κB through decreasing inhibitory κBα and NF-κB p65 phosphorylation and p65 nuclear translocation [94] reduces neuronal loss and glutamate levels [24,95]. Progesterone also reduces mitochondrial dysfunction and cell apoptosis [96] by inhibiting proapoptotic enzymes, cytochrome c, activated caspase-3, and the Bcl-2-associated death-promoter [92].

2.4.3. Prolactin

The protective role of prolactin in neuronal damage and neuroinflammation has been reviewed in detail [74]. Prolactin protects against brain damage, most likely through glial cells with some specific relevance to the female sex [97,98]. TBI affects the transport of prolactin inhibitory factors down the pituitary stalk into the gland resulting in disturbances of prolactin levels [99]. However, supplementation of prolactin in TBI subjects improves prolactin receptors, apolipoprotein E, and glial fibrillary acidic protein expression [98]. It decreases lesion-induced microgliosis, modifies the expression of microglial activation-related genes, and also protects from neuroinflammation by inhibiting NF-κB pathways via the extracellular regulated kinase 1/2 (ERK1/2) [97,100].

2.4.4. Cortisol

Glucocorticoids, including cortisol, are known for their life-saving roles in critical conditions like TBI. Their homeostatic, anti-inflammatory, and balancing hypothalamic-pituitary axis roles are well established; however, during TBI, their actions on metabolic, inflammatory, and neurochemical signaling are vital [75,101]. There is sex variation in cortisol-mediated response to TBI with some protective favor towards the female sex [3,51]. TBI disrupts limbic pathways involved in HPA axis coordination in males, and cortisol-induced immunosuppression is highly protective during the early stage of TBI as it decreases intracellular cAMP and decreases T cell infiltration and inflammatory responses in female mice [3].

2.4.5. Thyroid hormones and stimulating thyroid hormone

Thyroid hormones play a role in the protection and recovery after TBI [76]. They regulate neuronal plasticity processes, stimulate angiogenesis and neurogenesis, and modulate the dynamics of cytoskeletal elements and intracellular transport processes [102]. Nevertheless, few studies have demonstrated the sex-dependent and independent variation in thyroid hormones in TBI [103].

2.4.6. Dopamine

Similar to the mentioned hormones, neurotransmitters such as dopamine are affected during TBI [14]. A decrease in dopamine transporter (DAT) expression in males than in females following trauma has been reported [78]. Typically, females have a higher density of DAT binding sites than males [104], as estrogen regulates the dopamine system through genomic and nongenomic mechanisms, which are yet to be fully detailed [105].

Other neuroendocrine hormones like growth, adrenocorticotrophic (ACTH), TDH, and DHEA-S may have shown sex variation in TBI-affected individuals. Still, their role in neuroprotection needs more in-depth investigations [89,106].

2.5. Enzymatic response

Numerous enzymatic actions are identified as protective mechanisms in females against TBI [29,107]. Some of these enzymes are involved in hormone synthesis [108], antioxidant system [5], inflammatory mediator/protein synthesis, or apoptosis [38]. Enzymes involved in estrogen synthesis like estrogen synthase [81], estrogen-2-hydroxylase [109], phosphoinositide 3-kinase/Akt [108], p38α, Jun N-terminal kinase (JNK) and p38 [81,110], cycline-2 dependent kinases [111,112] and estrogen-metabolizing enzymes (EME) [81] including aromatase [81,113], steroid sulfatase [114], and estrogen steroid sulfotransferases [115] have a protective role in TBI. These estrogen metabolizing enzymes (EME) include aromatase, steroid sulfatase (STS), estrogen sulfotransferase (EST/SULT1E1), and some forms of 17β-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase (HSD17B). These enzymes are involved in both the initial conversion and interconversion of estrogen from precursors [81] and thus are involved in the protective response mediated through estrogen in TBI. Similarly, progesterone-related enzymes, including 3β-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase (3β-HSD) and 5α-reductase [116], play a role in mediating progesterone-linked neuroprotective actions, with many shown to be effective in females [90,116]. Several antioxidant/oxidant enzymes have been reported to have a role in aggravating or protecting against TBI. The enzymes that alleviate oxidative stress and thereby reduce the severity of TBI, including superoxide dismutase (SOD) [88], glutathione peroxidase, catalase, heme oxygenase, and thioredoxin [117], show sex variations. The enzymes that may aggravate TBI severity include nitric oxide (NO) synthase, xanthine dehydrogenase (XDH), xanthine oxidase (XO), phospholipases, cyclooxygenase, and 5-lipoxygenases which have also shown sex alterations [118]. Many studies have also reported higher oxidative stress in males compared to females post-TBI [5,14]. Males also have higher lipid peroxidation than females after severe TBI indicating sex-based aggravation in males [35]. Even brain cell mitochondria have shown less oxidative stress in females than males owing to more expression and enzymatic activity of the antioxidant system in females than males [36,39]. Mitochondrial-specific proapoptotic enzymes such as cytochrome c and activated caspase-3 [92] also showed sex variations, and their inhibition is beneficial in TBI [117]. Caspase mediates cell death in TBI is observed in females, whereas cell death is caspase-independent in males [38].

2.6. Neuroinflammatory response

The neuroinflammatory response is a major hallmark in TBI-induced injury, repair, and recovery pathophysiology. As a vital component of the secondary injury, glial cell activation and the infiltration of peripheral myeloid cells (macrophage, neutrophils, lymphocytes) play a major role in the acute neuroinflammatory cascade following TBI, which is directly associated with neuronal death [13]. The impact of sex differences on post-traumatic neuroinflammatory reactions has been disputed, and conflicting findings have been reported. While an earlier report showed no significant difference in microglial activation [119], recent studies have described a sex-based difference in preclinical models of TBI [120,121]. Villapol et al. have recently reported a completely divergent sex-based inflammatory response in the acute and subacute phases following TBI [22]. A rapid and significant increase and activation in microglial cells was found in male mice in different brain regions after TBI compared to female mice.

Moreover, rapid activation and infiltration of peripheral macrophage and other phagocytic cells were more pronounced in male mice but not in females. Acute astrogliosis measured by glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) was also significantly higher in the ipsilateral cortex of male mice [22]. Glial and peripheral immune cells exert the neuroinflammatory response by producing inflammatory cytokines and chemokines [13]. Studying the sex difference in cytokine expression demonstrated that although females exhibit higher proinflammatory cytokines (IL-1β and TNFα) at an earlier time, a delayed anti-inflammatory phase was observed up to 30 days post-injury [22]. In agreement with this evidence, Doran et al. reported a sexually dimorphic acute neuroinflammatory response following TBI represented by rapid and exaggerated activation and infiltration of myeloid cells in males, but not in females [122]. These divergent inflammatory responses are directly translated into increased neuronal death, lesion volume, and behavioral impairments in males than females. Understanding the basis of how neuroinflammatory responses are affected by sex is a key step in the development of individualized and effective therapeutics for TBI.

2.7. Oxidative response

There is a differential oxidative/antioxidant stress response in males and females against TBI [14,115]. In addition to the oxidative-related enzymatic response mentioned earlier, males have more oxidative stress owing to more lipid peroxidation [35] and less expression and enzymatic activity of the antioxidant system in mitochondria [36,39]. An earlier clinical study showed that women had remarkably lower F2-isoprostane levels, a marker of lipid peroxidation, than men in cerebrospinal fluid samples following severe TBI [35]. Likewise, a recent preclinical study reported higher post-TBI peroxide production in the pericontusional cortex in male rats, while no significant change was noticed in females [123]. Moreover, female and male rats have a distinct increase in protein carbonylation after TBI in the injured area [14]. Progesterone and estrogen also provide antioxidant effects by regulating mitochondrial oxidative metabolism in the brain and reducing protein carbonylation. Interaction of sex hormones like estrogen [87] or progesterone [94] with the antioxidant system reduces oxidative stress in females as compared to males [87,94].

2.8. Genetic response

Differential expression of genes and pathways associated with brain injury and recovery in males and females highlights sex-specific response towards TBI [15,124]. Genetics and sex hormones influence inflammation, edema, oxidative stress, excitotoxicity, and mitochondrial function [29,38]. Neuronal trophic factors, such as brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) is essential for neuronal growth and function but show differential expression in males and females following TBI [125]. The expression of dopamine transporter (DAT), important in the brain’s dopaminergic system and involved in cellular function and CNS inflammation, is reduced more in males than females [78,126]. Females carrying the APOE4 allele have shown worse Glasgow Outcome Scale-Extended (GOS-E) scores than males [127]. Race and sex affect race-specific single nucleotide polymorphisms in genes affecting inflammation and predisposition to genetic diseases [128].

2.9. Mitochondrial response

There are sex differences in mitochondrial function or dysfunction that influence the neuroprotective response in males and females [38] and might contribute to differential sex-dependent outcomes following TBI [5]. Mitochondria play a sex-specific role in metabolism, inflammation, oxidative stress, and apoptosis and are sex-specific [55]. Reduced expression of mitochondrial-specific proapoptotic caspase-3 [70] in females compared to males is considered a protective mechanism against cell death following TBI, similar to cytochrome C [92]. Mitochondria and sex hormone interaction and the defensive response against TBI in females have also revealed favorable outcomes by supporting mitochondria biogenesis, reducing oxidative stress and apoptosis [87].

3. Discrepancies in sex-based response to TBI; reasons and solutions

As reported by many studies, females are suggested to have a greater degree of protection against TBI. We provided the possible detailed mechanisms with scientific evidence. However, we came across numerous studies wherein either nonsignificant sex differences to TBI or more vulnerability of females compared to males or more protective response by males were found. Limited studies have shown unfavorable results or poor outcomes for females or no significant difference compared to males like lesion volume [129], edema [45], neurodegeneration [129], increased neuroinflammation, astrocytosis [130], microglia activation [22,129], BBB permeability [58,129], and inflammatory cytokines (TNF-α, IL-1β, and IL-17) [40]. After analyzing the literature, we came across various possible reasons for the sex differences in TBI. Less or no inclusion of females in TBI studies is one of the main reasons for getting inconclusive sex-based differences. Many studies have used male subjects, but studies on female subjects are limited. Hence, including the female sex as a biological variable in TBI studies can help remove sex-based bias [7].

A small sample size of the population or group can be another reason. In most of the TBI studies, females are under-represented [17]; as a result, there are inappropriate results, and data interpretation becomes difficult. Increasing the sample size or the number of participants in TBI studies can produce reliable results without bias. The types of TBI, viz. mild, moderate, or severe to be studied, also reflect variations. Studying similar TBI types simultaneously in different sexes can reveal differences in response. TBI of a moderate to severe nature generates an equivocal response in females compared to males in both animals and humans. Sex differences in animals and humans result in variable responses and recovery against TBI of mild nature. On subjective measures, mild injuries tend to have a better outcome in female animals and worst in women reflecting variation between responses; however, on closer observation, similar trends of preclinical and clinical studies are noted concerning the female sex [14,15]. In animal models, a difference in sex-based outcomes has been revealed depending on the model used and the parameter assessed. In animal studies, contrary to human studies, most females have better outcomes than males after TBI. Of the studies conducted by the controlled cortical impact (CCI) model of TBI, 55% have shown that females have better outcomes in post-injury evaluation, including behavioral and motor functions [5,40]. In the closed head injury (CHI) model of TBI, 31% reported better outcomes in females based on the evaluation of cytoskeletal degradation, reactive astrogliosis, and cortical blood flow. Of the TBI fluid percussion injury (FPI) model, 60% noticed that females have worse survival and regulation of cell apoptosis [5,40]. This shows parameters to be evaluated pre-, or post-TBI also determine the nature of sex variations, while females have favor in some parameters and males in others. For example, when choosing hormones as parameters, females have specific or more relevant hormones, and males have their own set of hormones. So, evaluating only one kind of hormone may provide a biased result. Just like estrogen and progesterone, the male hormone testosterone has shown neuroprotective actions, such as increased levels of antioxidants, BNDF [131], decreased reactive astroglia and microglia [132], favoring neurogenesis [131], protecting mitochondrial function [133], and regulating the expression of neuroglobin in astrocytes [134].

Similarly, subjective outcomes like cognitive and psychosocial outcomes may raise bias concerns. The selection of parameters based on objective measures would be helpful. Age, puberty, duration, differential patterning, social involvement, or environmental interaction also affects the sex-specific evaluation of TBI [5,8,15]. In addition, understanding sex-based differences in neurogenesis post-TBI may reveal some hidden facets, as there are pieces of evidence for such differences in normal genders. In this context, there are sex differences in neurogenesis, with females having more favor than males in most of the studies [135]. Neurogenesis is reflected by cell proliferation, migration, differentiation, and survival. Some of these events can be independent or interdependent [136]. Variation in neurogenesis steps post-TBI is rarely explored but may have sex-based influence at different levels, including angiogenesis or vasculature [102,129], neurogenesis [80], mitochondrial biogenesis [87], or antioxidant defense [131]. Lastly, the use of experimental TBI models, advanced techniques, preferably non-invasive ones, and specific biomarkers can help remove sex-related biases.

4. Conclusion

Although considered to have protective mechanisms against TBI, the female sex needs to be studied in detail concerning various TBI-related models and mechanisms. Multiple factors affect the outcome of TBI studies, and normalizing these factors against different variables can help to uniform the investigation. In addition to subjective outcomes against TBI, the female sex needs to be evaluated on objective measures for various protective mechanisms discussed here. This review outlines these mechanisms from morphological, cellular, and molecular aspects to provide an understanding of the demonstrated protective nature of females against TBI. It also reveals an interrelation among these mechanisms wherein they supplement each other.

Furthermore, it summarises various biomarkers based on physiological, pathobiological, biochemical, hormonal, hematological/serological, oxidative, inflammatory, genetic, or cellular backgrounds that can be explored for diagnostic and prognostic purposes of TBI (Figure 1). These biomarkers provide a set of objective measures that can be monitored over time to assess discrete sex variations in the TBI response being investigated. These can also serve as potential molecular targets for designing future individualized therapeutic interventions against TBI. Ultimately, the foremost requirement in future research is to include the female sex as a biological variable in sufficient numbers to overcome the under-representation in TBI research.

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

The potential mechanisms involved in the sex-related difference in response to TBI. Various basis of responsive mechanisms is represented in the pathophysiology of TBI and some of them are found to be sexually distinct. Several components are included under each mechanical response which can be investigated as essential biomarkers for the development of individualized therapeutic strategies for the treatment of TBI (created with BioRender.com).

Funding:

The study was supported by a grant from the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke of the National Institutes of Health #R01NS112642 to ZAS

Footnotes

Declaration of competing interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Data availability

No data was used for the research described in the article.

References:

  • 1.Taylor CA; Bell JM; Breiding MJ; Xu L Traumatic brain injury–related emergency department visits, hospitalizations, and deaths—United States, 2007 and 2013. MMWR Surveillance Summaries 2017, 66, 1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Esterov D; Bellamkonda E; Mandrekar J; Ransom JE; Brown AW Cause of death after traumatic brain injury: a population-based health record review analysis referenced for nonhead trauma. Neuroepidemiology 2021, 55, 180–187. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Blaya MO; Raval AP; Bramlett HM Traumatic brain injury in women across lifespan. Neurobiology of disease 2022, 105613. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Coronado VG; McGuire LC; Sarmiento K; Bell J; Lionbarger MR; Jones CD; Geller AI; Khoury N; Xu L Trends in traumatic brain injury in the US and the public health response: 1995–2009. Journal of safety research 2012, 43, 299–307. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Gupte RP; Brooks WM; Vukas RR; Pierce JD; Harris JL Sex differences in traumatic brain injury: what we know and what we should know. Journal of neurotrauma 2019, 36, 3063–3091. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Späni CB; Braun DJ; Van Eldik LJ Sex-related responses after traumatic brain injury: Considerations for preclinical modeling. Frontiers in neuroendocrinology 2018, 50, 52–66. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Thomas TC; Bromberg CE; Krishna G Female sex in experimental traumatic brain injury research: forging a path forward. Neural regeneration research 2022, 17, 550. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Valera EM; Joseph A-LC; Snedaker K; Breiding MJ; Robertson CL; Colantonio A; Levin H; Pugh MJ; Yurgelun-Todd D; Mannix R Understanding traumatic brain injury in females: a state-of-the-art summary and future directions. The Journal of head trauma rehabilitation 2021, 36, E1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Blennow K; Brody DL; Kochanek PM; Levin H; McKee A; Ribbers GM; Yaffe K; Zetterberg H Traumatic brain injuries. Nature reviews Disease primers 2016, 2, 1–19. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Saatman KE; Duhaime A-C; Bullock R; Maas AI; Valadka A; Manley GT Classification of traumatic brain injury for targeted therapies. Journal of neurotrauma 2008, 25, 719–738. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Wilson L; Stewart W; Dams-O’Connor K; Diaz-Arrastia R; Horton L; Menon DK; Polinder S The chronic and evolving neurological consequences of traumatic brain injury. The Lancet Neurology 2017, 16, 813–825. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Ray S; Dixon C; Banik N Molecular mechanisms in the pathogenesis of traumatic brain injury. Histology and histopathology 2002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Ng SY; Lee AYW Traumatic brain injuries: pathophysiology and potential therapeutic targets. Frontiers in cellular neuroscience 2019, 13, 528. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Ma C; Wu X; Shen X; Yang Y; Chen Z; Sun X; Wang Z Sex differences in traumatic brain injury: a multi-dimensional exploration in genes, hormones, cells, individuals, and society. Chinese neurosurgical journal 2019, 5, 1–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Rubin TG; Lipton ML Sex differences in animal models of traumatic brain injury. Journal of experimental neuroscience 2019, 13, 1179069519844020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Munivenkatappa A; Agrawal A; Shukla DP; Kumaraswamy D; Devi BI Traumatic brain injury: Does gender influence outcomes? International journal of critical illness and injury science 2016, 6, 70. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Biegon A Considering biological sex in traumatic brain injury. Frontiers in neurology 2021, 12, 576366. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Dennis YR(2000). Alternative models of government-nonprofit section. [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Coyle PK What can we learn from sex differences in MS? Journal of Personalized Medicine 2021, 11, 1006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Safi NV; Krieger S Men with Multiple Sclerosis. Pract. Neurol 2021, 37–40. [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Golden LC; Voskuhl R The importance of studying sex differences in disease: The example of multiple sclerosis. Journal of neuroscience research 2017, 95, 633–643. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Villapol S; Loane DJ; Burns MP Sexual dimorphism in the inflammatory response to traumatic brain injury. Glia 2017, 65, 1423–1438. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Ma C; Wu X; Shen X; Yang Y; Chen Z; Sun X; Wang Z Sex differences in traumatic brain injury: a multi-dimensional exploration in genes, hormones, cells, individuals, and society. Chinese neurosurgical journal 2019, 5, 1–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Brotfain E; E Gruenbaum S; Boyko M; Kutz R; Zlotnik A; Klein M Neuroprotection by estrogen and progesterone in traumatic brain injury and spinal cord injury. Current neuropharmacology 2016, 14, 641–653. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Roof RL; Duvdevani R; Braswell L; Stein DG Progesterone facilitates cognitive recovery and reduces secondary neuronal loss caused by cortical contusion injury in male rats. Experimental neurology 1994, 129, 64–69. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Haider AH; Crompton JG; Chang DC; Efron DT; Haut ER; Handly N; Cornwell III EE Evidence of hormonal basis for improved survival among females with trauma-associated shock: an analysis of the National Trauma Data Bank. Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery 2010, 69, 537–540. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Caplan B; Bogner J; Brenner L; Arciniegas D; Myrga JM; Failla MD; Ricker JH; Dixon CE; Conley YP; Arenth PM A dopamine pathway gene risk score for cognitive recovery following traumatic brain injury: methodological considerations, preliminary findings, and interactions with sex. Journal of head trauma rehabilitation 2016, 31, E15–E29. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Kövesdi E; Szabó-Meleg E; Abrahám IM The role of estradiol in traumatic brain injury: mechanism and treatment potential. International journal of molecular sciences 2020, 22, 11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Günther M; Plantman S; Davidsson J; Angéria M; Mathiesen T; Risling M COX-2 regulation and TUNEL-positive cell death differ between genders in the secondary inflammatory response following experimental penetrating focal brain injury in rats. Acta Neurochirurgica 2015, 157, 649–659. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Lazarus RC; Buonora JE; Jacobowitz DM; Mueller GP Protein carbonylation after traumatic brain injury: cell specificity, regional susceptibility, and gender differences. Free Radical Biology and Medicine 2015, 78, 89–100. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Moore EE; Moore HB; Kornblith LZ; Neal MD; Hoffman M; Mutch NJ; Schöchl H; Hunt BJ; Sauaia A Author Correction: Trauma-induced coagulopathy. Nature Reviews Disease Primers 2022, 8, 1–1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Chiaretti A; Antonelli A; Riccardi R; Genovese O; Pezzotti P; Di Rocco C; Tortorolo L; Piedimonte G Nerve growth factor expression correlates with severity and outcome of traumatic brain injury in children. European Journal of Paediatric Neurology 2008, 12, 195–204. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Xiong Y; Mahmood A; Lu D; Qu C; Goussev A; Schallert T; Chopp M Role of gender in outcome after traumatic brain injury and therapeutic effect of erythropoietin in mice. Brain research 2007, 1185, 301–312. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Hall ED; Pazara KE; Linseman KL Sex differences in postischemic neuronal necrosis in gerbils. Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow & Metabolism 1991, 11, 292–298. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Bayir H; Marion DW; Puccio AM; Wisniewski SR; Janesko KL; Clark RS; Kochanek PM Marked gender effect on lipid peroxidation after severe traumatic brain injury in adult patients. Journal of neurotrauma 2004, 21, 1–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Borrás C; Sastre J; García-Sala D; Lloret A; Pallardó FV; Viña J Mitochondria from females exhibit higher antioxidant gene expression and lower oxidative damage than males. Free radical biology and medicine 2003, 34, 546–552. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Duncan KA; Garijo-Garde S Sex, genes, and traumatic brain injury (TBI): a call for a gender inclusive approach to the study of TBI in the lab. Frontiers in neuroscience 2021, 520. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Demarest TG; McCarthy MM Sex differences in mitochondrial (dys) function: Implications for neuroprotection. Journal of bioenergetics and biomembranes 2015, 47, 173–188. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Gaignard P; Savouroux S; Liere P; Pianos A; Thérond P; Schumacher M; Slama A; Guennoun R Effect of sex differences on brain mitochondrial function and its suppression by ovariectomy and in aged mice. Endocrinology 2015, 156, 2893–2904. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Scott MC; Prabhakara KS; Walters AJ; Olson SD; Cox CS Jr Determining sex-based differences in inflammatory response in an experimental traumatic brain injury model. Frontiers in immunology 2022, 13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Mollayeva T; Mollayeva S; Pacheco N; Colantonio A Systematic review of sex and gender effects in traumatic brain injury: equity in clinical and functional outcomes. Frontiers in neurology 2021, 12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Ruigrok AN; Salimi-Khorshidi G; Lai M-C; Baron-Cohen S; Lombardo MV; Tait RJ; Suckling J A meta-analysis of sex differences in human brain structure. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews 2014, 39, 34–50. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Klabunde M; Weems CF; Raman M; Carrion VG The moderating effects of sex on insula subdivision structure in youth with posttraumatic stress symptoms. Depression and anxiety 2017, 34, 51–58. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Bramlett HM; Dietrich WD Neuropathological protection after traumatic brain injury in intact female rats versus males or ovariectomized females. Journal of neurotrauma 2001, 18, 891–900. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Roof RL; Duvdevani R; Stein DG Gender influences outcome of brain injury: progesterone plays a protective role. Brain research 1993, 607, 333–336. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Dollé J-P; Jaye A; Anderson SA; Ahmadzadeh H; Shenoy VB; Smith DH Newfound sex differences in axonal structure underlie differential outcomes from in vitro traumatic axonal injury. Experimental neurology 2018, 300, 121–134. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Spychala MS; Honarpisheh P; McCullough LD Sex differences in neuroinflammation and neuroprotection in ischemic stroke. Journal of neuroscience research 2017, 95, 462–471. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Coates BM; Vavilala MS; Mack CD; Muangman S; Suz P; Sharar SR; Bulger E; Lam AM The influence of definition and location of hypotension on outcome following severe pediatric traumatic brain injury. Critical care medicine 2005, 33, 2645. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.O’Connor C; Cernak I; Vink R The temporal profile of edema formation differs between male and female rats following diffuse traumatic brain injury. In Proceedings of the Brain Edema XIII, 2006; pp. 121–124. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Cash A; Theus MH Mechanisms of blood–brain barrier dysfunction in traumatic brain injury. International journal of molecular sciences 2020, 21, 3344. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Russell AL; Richardson MR; Bauman BM; Hernandez IM; Saperstein S; Handa RJ; Wu TJ Differential responses of the HPA axis to mild blast traumatic brain injury in male and female mice. Endocrinology 2018, 159, 2363–2375. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Dash PK; Hergenroeder GW; Jeter CB; Choi HA; Kobori N; Moore AN Traumatic brain injury alters methionine metabolism: implications for pathophysiology. Frontiers in systems neuroscience 2016, 10, 36. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Shahrokhi N; Khaksari M; Soltani Z; Mahmoodi M; Nakhaee N Effect of sex steroid hormones on brain edema, intracranial pressure, and neurologic outcomes after traumatic brain injury. Canadian journal of physiology and pharmacology 2010, 88, 414–421. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Ransohoff RM; Perry VH Microglial physiology: unique stimuli, specialized responses. Annual review of immunology 2009, 27, 119–145. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Kalimon OJ; Sullivan PG Sex differences in mitochondrial function following a controlled cortical impact traumatic brain injury in rodents. Frontiers in molecular neuroscience 2021, 236. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Roof RL; Duvdevani R; Heyburn JW; Stein DG Progesterone rapidly decreases brain edema: treatment delayed up to 24 hours is still effective. Experimental neurology 1996, 138, 246–251. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.O’Connor C; Cernak I; Vink R The temporal profile of edema formation differs between male and female rats following diffuse traumatic brain injury. In Brain Edema XIII; Springer: 2006; pp. 121–124. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.O’Connor CA; Cernak I; Vink R Both estrogen and progesterone attenuate edema formation following diffuse traumatic brain injury in rats. Brain Research 2005, 1062, 171–174. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Taylor AN; Tio DL; Paydar A; Sutton RL Sex differences in thermal, stress, and inflammatory responses to minocycline administration in rats with traumatic brain injury. Journal of neurotrauma 2018, 35, 630–638. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Armstead WM; Vavilala MS Adrenomedullin reduces gender-dependent loss of hypotensive cerebrovasodilation after newborn brain injury through activation of ATP-dependent K channels. Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow & Metabolism 2007, 27, 1702–1709. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Armstead WM; Kiessling JW; Bdeir K; Kofke WA; Vavilala MS Adrenomedullin prevents sex-dependent impairment of autoregulation during hypotension after piglet brain injury through inhibition of ERK MAPK upregulation. Journal of Neurotrauma 2010, 27, 391–402. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Armstead WM; Kiessling JW; Riley J; Kofke WA; Vavilala MS Phenylephrine infusion prevents impairment of ATP-and calcium-sensitive potassium channel-mediated cerebrovasodilation after brain injury in female, but aggravates impairment in male, piglets through modulation of ERK MAPK upregulation. Journal of neurotrauma 2011, 28, 105–111. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Armstead WM; Riley J; Vavilala MS TBI sex dependently upregulates ET-1 to impair autoregulation, which is aggravated by phenylephrine in males but is abrogated in females. Journal of neurotrauma 2012, 29, 1483–1490. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Armstead WM; Kiessling JW; Kofke WA; Vavilala MS Impaired cerebral blood flow autoregulation during postraumatic arterial hypotension after fluid percussion brain injury is prevented by phenylephrine in female but exacerbated in male piglets by ERK MAPK upregulation. Critical care medicine 2010, 38, 1868. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.ROOF RL; HALL ED Estrogen-related gender difference in survival rate and cortical blood flow after impact-acceleration head injury in rats. Journal of neurotrauma 2000, 17, 1155–1169. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Geddes RI; Peterson BL; Stein DG; Sayeed I Progesterone treatment shows benefit in female rats in a pediatric model of controlled cortical impact injury. PLoS One 2016, 11, e0146419. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Free KE; Greene AM; Bondi CO; Lajud N; Patricia B; Kline AE Comparable impediment of cognitive function in female and male rats subsequent to daily administration of haloperidol after traumatic brain injury. Experimental neurology 2017, 296, 62–68. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Meffre D; Pianos A; Liere P; Eychenne B; Cambourg A; Schumacher M; Stein D; Guennoun R Steroid profiling in brain and plasma of male and pseudopregnant female rats after traumatic brain injury: analysis by gas chromatography/mass spectrometry. Endocrinology 2007, 148, 2505–2517. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Bramlett HM; Furones-Alonso O; Lotocki G; Rodriguez-Paez A; Sanchez-Molano J; Keane RW Sex differences in XIAP cleavage after traumatic brain injury in the rat. Neuroscience letters 2009, 461, 49–53. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.O’Connor CA; Cernak I; Johnson F; Vink R Effects of progesterone on neurologic and morphologic outcome following diffuse traumatic brain injury in rats. Experimental Neurology 2007, 205, 145–153. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Raghava N; Das BC; Ray SK Neuroprotective effects of estrogen in CNS injuries: insights from animal models. Neuroscience and neuroeconomics 2017, 6, 15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Espinoza TR; Wright DW The role of progesterone in traumatic brain injury. The Journal of head trauma rehabilitation 2011, 26, 497. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Clevenger AC; Kim H; Salcedo E; Yonchek JC; Rodgers KM; Orfila JE; Dietz RM; Quillinan N; Traystman RJ; Herson PS Endogenous sex steroids dampen neuroinflammation and improve outcome of traumatic brain injury in mice. Journal of Molecular Neuroscience 2018, 64, 410–420. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Ramos-Martinez E; Ramos-Martínez I; Molina-Salinas G; Zepeda-Ruiz WA; Cerbon M The role of prolactin in central nervous system inflammation. Reviews in the Neurosciences 2021, 32, 323–340. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Weil ZM; White B; Whitehead B; Karelina K The role of the stress system in recovery after traumatic brain injury: A tribute to Bruce S. McEwen. Neurobiology of Stress 2022, 100467. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Liu Y-Y; Brent GA Thyroid hormone and the brain: mechanisms of action in development and role in protection and promotion of recovery after brain injury. Pharmacology & therapeutics 2018, 186, 176–185. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Wagner AK; Bayir H; Ren D; Puccio A; Zafonte RD; Kochanek PM Relationships between cerebrospinal fluid markers of excitotoxicity, ischemia, and oxidative damage after severe TBI: the impact of gender, age, and hypothermia. Journal of neurotrauma 2004, 21, 125–136. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Wagner AK; Chen X; Kline AE; Li Y; Zafonte RD; Dixon CE Gender and environmental enrichment impact dopamine transporter expression after experimental traumatic brain injury. Experimental neurology 2005, 195, 475–483. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Gasco V; Cambria V; Bioletto F; Ghigo E; Grottoli S Traumatic brain injury as frequent cause of hypopituitarism and growth hormone deficiency: epidemiology, diagnosis, and treatment. Frontiers in endocrinology 2021, 12, 634415. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Acaz-Fonseca E; Avila-Rodriguez M; Garcia-Segura LM; Barreto GE Regulation of astroglia by gonadal steroid hormones under physiological and pathological conditions. Progress in neurobiology 2016, 144, 5–26. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Duncan KA Estrogen formation and inactivation following TBI: what we know and where we could go. Frontiers in endocrinology 2020, 345. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Cox A; Varma A; Barry J; Vertegel A; Banik N Nanoparticle estrogen in rat spinal cord injury elicits rapid anti-inflammatory effects in plasma, cerebrospinal fluid, and tissue. Journal of neurotrauma 2015, 32, 1413–1421. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Hill RA; Chua HK; Jones ME; Simpson ER; Boon WC Estrogen deficiency results in apoptosis in the frontal cortex of adult female aromatase knockout mice. Molecular and Cellular Neuroscience 2009, 41, 1–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Culmsee C; Vedder H; Ravati A; Junker V; Otto D; Ahlemeyer B; Krieg J-C; Krieglstein J Neuroprotection by estrogens in a mouse model of focal cerebral ischemia and in cultured neurons: evidence for a receptor-independent antioxidative mechanism. Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow & Metabolism 1999, 19, 1263–1269. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Brann DW; Dhandapani K; Wakade C; Mahesh VB; Khan MM Neurotrophic and neuroprotective actions of estrogen: basic mechanisms and clinical implications. Steroids 2007, 72, 381–405. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Cimarosti H; O’Shea RD; Jones NM; Horn AP; Simão F; Zamin LL; Nassif M; Frozza R; Netto CA; Beart PM The effects of estradiol on estrogen receptor and glutamate transporter expression in organotypic hippocampal cultures exposed to oxygen--glucose deprivation. Neurochemical research 2006, 31, 483–490. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Kemper MF; Stirone C; Krause DN; Duckles SP; Procaccio V Genomic and non-genomic regulation of PGC1 isoforms by estrogen to increase cerebral vascular mitochondrial biogenesis and reactive oxygen species protection. European journal of pharmacology 2014, 723, 322–329. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Wei J; Xiao G.-m. The neuroprotective effects of progesterone on traumatic brain injury: current status and future prospects. Acta Pharmacologica Sinica 2013, 34, 1485–1490. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89.Lopez-Rodriguez AB; Acaz-Fonseca E; Giatti S; Caruso D; Viveros M-P; Melcangi RC; Garcia-Segura LM Correlation of brain levels of progesterone and dehydroepiandrosterone with neurological recovery after traumatic brain injury in female mice. Psychoneuroendocrinology 2015, 56, 1–11. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90.Webster KM; Wright DK; Sun M; Semple BD; Ozturk E; Stein DG; O’Brien TJ; Shultz SR Progesterone treatment reduces neuroinflammation, oxidative stress and brain damage and improves long-term outcomes in a rat model of repeated mild traumatic brain injury. Journal of neuroinflammation 2015, 12, 1–13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91.Garay L; Deniselle MCG; Lima A; Roig P; De Nicola AF Effects of progesterone in the spinal cord of a mouse model of multiple sclerosis. The Journal of steroid biochemistry and molecular biology 2007, 107, 228–237. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92.Stein DG; Wright DW Progesterone in the clinical treatment of acute traumatic brain injury. Expert opinion on investigational drugs 2010, 19, 847–857. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 93.Chen G; Shi J; Ding Y; Yin H; Hang C Progesterone prevents traumatic brain injury-induced intestinal nuclear factor kappa B activation and proinflammatory cytokines expression in male rats. Mediators of inflammation 2007, 2007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 94.Lei B; Mace B; Dawson HN; Warner DS; Laskowitz DT; James ML Anti-inflammatory effects of progesterone in lipopolysaccharide-stimulated BV-2 microglia. PloS one 2014, 9, e103969. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 95.Zlotnik A; Gurevich B; Tkachov S; Maoz I; Shapira Y; Teichberg VI Brain neuroprotection by scavenging blood glutamate. Experimental neurology 2007, 203, 213–220. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 96.Robertson CL; Puskar A; Hoffman GE; Murphy AZ; Saraswati M; Fiskum G Physiologic progesterone reduces mitochondrial dysfunction and hippocampal cell loss after traumatic brain injury in female rats. Experimental neurology 2006, 197, 235–243. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 97.Reyes-Mendoza J; Morales T Post-treatment with prolactin protects hippocampal CA1 neurons of the ovariectomized female rat against kainic acid-induced neurodegeneration. Neuroscience 2016, 328, 58–68. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 98.Yousefvand S; Keshavarzi Z; Dolatshad H; Vafaee F; Mahmoudabady M; Virany ZG Effects of prolactin on movement disorders and APOE, GFAP, and PRL receptor gene expression following intracerebral hemorrhage in rats. Iranian Journal of Basic Medical Sciences 2021, 24, 1709. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 99.Scranton RA; Baskin DS Impaired pituitary axes following traumatic brain injury. Journal of clinical medicine 2015, 4, 1463–1479. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 100.Zhu Z; Yan J; Geng C; Wang D; Li C; Feng S; Wang H A polymorphism Within the 3′ UTR of NLRP3 is associated with susceptibility for ischemic stroke in chinese population. Cellular and molecular neurobiology 2016, 36, 981–988. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 101.Collaborators CT Effect of intravenous corticosteroids on death within 14 days in 10 008 adults with clinically significant head injury (MRC CRASH trial): randomised placebo-controlled trial. The Lancet 2004, 364, 1321–1328. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 102.Talhada D; Santos CRA; Gonçalves I; Ruscher K Thyroid hormones in the brain and their impact in recovery mechanisms after stroke. Frontiers in Neurology 2019, 10, 1103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 103.Mele C; Pagano L; Franciotta D; Caputo M; Nardone A; Aimaretti G; Marzullo P; Pingue V Thyroid function in the subacute phase of traumatic brain injury: a potential predictor of post-traumatic neurological and functional outcomes. Journal of Endocrinological Investigation 2022, 45, 379–389. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 104.Morissette M; Di Paolo T Sex and estrous cycle variations of rat striatal dopamine uptake sites. Neuroendocrinology 1993, 58, 16–22. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 105.Küppers E; Ivanova T; Karolczak M; Beyer C Estrogen: a multifunctional messenger to nigrostriatal dopaminergic neurons. Journal of neurocytology 2000, 29, 375–385. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 106.Di Battista AP; Rhind SG; Churchill N; Richards D; Lawrence DW; Hutchison MG Peripheral blood neuroendocrine hormones are associated with clinical indices of sport-related concussion. Scientific reports 2019, 9, 1–10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 107.Moore EE; Moore HB; Kornblith LZ; Neal MD; Hoffman M; Mutch NJ; Schöchl H; Hunt BJ; Sauaia A Trauma-induced coagulopathy. Nature Reviews Disease Primers 2021, 7, 1–23. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 108.Zhu C; Wang S; Wang B; Du F; Hu C; Li H; Feng Y; Zhu R; Mo M; Cao Y 17β-Estradiol up-regulates Nrf2 via PI3K/AKT and estrogen receptor signaling pathways to suppress light-induced degeneration in rat retina. Neuroscience 2015, 304, 328–339. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 109.Balthazart J; Stoop R; Foidart A; Granneman J; Lambert J Distribution and regulation of estrogen-2-hydroxylase in the quail brain. Brain research bulletin 1994, 35, 339–345. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 110.Han D; Scott EL; Dong Y; Raz L; Wang R; Zhang Q Attenuation of mitochondrial and nuclear p38α signaling: a novel mechanism of estrogen neuroprotection in cerebral ischemia. Molecular and cellular endocrinology 2015, 400, 21–31. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 111.Leitman DC; Paruthiyil S; Vivar OI; Saunier EF; Herber CB; Cohen I; Tagliaferri M; Speed TP Regulation of specific target genes and biological responses by strogen receptor subtype agonists. Current opinion in pharmacology 2010, 10, 629–636. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 112.Koos RD Minireview: putting physiology back into estrogens’ mechanism of action. Endocrinology 2011, 152, 4481–4488. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 113.Almadhidi J; Moslemi S; Drosdowsky MA; Séralini G-E Equine cytochrome P450 aromatase exhibits an estrogen 2-hydroxylase activity in vitro. The Journal of Steroid Biochemistry and Molecular Biology 1996, 59, 55–61. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 114.Purohit A; Potter B; Parker M; Reed M Steroid sulphatase: expression, isolation and inhibition for active-site identification studies. Chemico-Biological Interactions 1998, 109, 183–193. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 115.Kim H; Yu T; Cam-Etoz B; van Groen T; Hubbard WJ; Chaudry IH Treatment of traumatic brain injury with 17α-ethinylestradiol-3-sulfate in a rat model. Journal of neurosurgery 2016, 127, 23–31. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 116.Schumacher M; Hussain R; Gago N; Oudinet J-P; Mattern C; Ghoumari AM Progesterone synthesis in the nervous system: implications for myelination and myelin repair. Frontiers in neuroscience 2012, 6, 10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 117.Ismail H; Shakkour Z; Tabet M; Abdelhady S; Kobaisi A; Abedi R; Nasrallah L; Pintus G; Al-Dhaheri Y; Mondello S Traumatic brain injury: oxidative stress and novel anti-oxidants such as mitoquinone and edaravone. Antioxidants 2020, 9, 943. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 118.Di Pietro V; Yakoub KM; Caruso G; Lazzarino G; Signoretti S; Barbey AK; Tavazzi B; Lazzarino G; Belli A; Amorini AM Antioxidant therapies in traumatic brain injury. Antioxidants 2020, 9, 260. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 119.Bruce-Keller AJ; Dimayuga FO; Reed JL; Wang C; Angers R; Wilson ME; Dimayuga VM; Scheff SW Gender and estrogen manipulation do not affect traumatic brain injury in mice. Journal of neurotrauma 2007, 24, 203–215. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 120.Acaz-Fonseca E; Duran JC; Carrero P; Garcia-Segura LM; Arevalo MA Sex differences in glia reactivity after cortical brain injury. Glia 2015, 63, 1966–1981. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 121.Clevenger AC; Kim H; Salcedo E; Yonchek JC; Rodgers KM; Orfila JE; Dietz RM; Quillinan N; Traystman RJ; Herson PS Endogenous sex steroids dampen neuroinflammation and improve outcome of traumatic brain injury in mice. Journal of Molecular Neuroscience 2018, 64, 410–420. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 122.Doran SJ; Ritzel RM; Glaser EP; Henry RJ; Faden AI; Loane DJ Sex differences in acute neuroinflammation after experimental traumatic brain injury are mediated by infiltrating myeloid cells. Journal of neurotrauma 2019, 36, 1040–1053. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 123.Greco T; Vespa PM; Prins ML Alternative substrate metabolism depends on cerebral metabolic state following traumatic brain injury. Experimental neurology 2020, 329, 113289. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 124.Gray J; Milner T; McEwen B Dynamic plasticity: the role of glucocorticoids, brain- derived neurotrophic factor and other trophic factors. Neuroscience 2013, 239, 214–227. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 125.Chen X; Li Y; Kline A; Dixon C; Zafonte R; Wagner A Gender and environmental effects on regional brain-derived neurotrophic factor expression after experimental traumatic brain injury. Neuroscience 2005, 135, 11–17. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 126.Lan Y-L; Li S; Lou J-C; Ma X-C; Zhang B The potential roles of dopamine in traumatic brain injury: a preclinical and clinical update. American journal of translational research 2019, 11, 2616. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 127.Öst M; Nylen K; Csajbok L; Blennow K; Rosengren L; Nellgård B Apolipoprotein E polymorphism and gender difference in outcome after severe traumatic brain injury. Acta anaesthesiologica scandinavica 2008, 52, 1364–1369. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 128.Huang T; Shu Y; Cai Y-D Genetic differences among ethnic groups. BMC genomics 2015, 16, 1–10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 129.Jullienne A; Salehi A; Affeldt B; Baghchechi M; Haddad E; Avitua A; Walsworth M; Enjalric I; Hamer M; Bhakta S Male and female mice exhibit divergent responses of the cortical vasculature to traumatic brain injury. Journal of neurotrauma 2018, 35, 1646–1658. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 130.Bromberg CE; Condon AM; Ridgway SW; Krishna G; Garcia-Filion PC; Adelson PD; Rowe RK; Thomas TC Sex-dependent pathology in the HPA axis at a sub-acute period after experimental traumatic brain injury. Frontiers in Neurology 2020, 11, 946. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 131.Fanaei H; Karimian SM; Sadeghipour HR; Hassanzade G; Kasaeian A; Attari F; Khayat S; Ramezani V; Javadimehr M Testosterone enhances functional recovery after stroke through promotion of antioxidant defenses, BDNF levels and neurogenesis in male rats. Brain research 2014, 1558, 74–83. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 132.Barreto G; Veiga S; Azcoitia I; Garcia-Segura LM; Garcia-Ovejero D Testosterone decreases reactive astroglia and reactive microglia after brain injury in male rats: role of its metabolites, oestradiol and dihydrotestosterone. European Journal of Neuroscience 2007, 25, 3039–3046. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 133.Toro-Urrego N; Garcia-Segura LM; Echeverria V; Barreto GE Testosterone protects mitochondrial function and regulates neuroglobin expression in astrocytic cells exposed to glucose deprivation. Frontiers in aging neuroscience 2016, 8, 152. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] [Retracted]
  • 134.Bharadwaj VN; Copeland C; Mathew E; Newbern J; Anderson TR; Lifshitz J; Kodibagkar VD; Stabenfeldt SE Sex-dependent macromolecule and nanoparticle delivery in experimental brain injury. Tissue Engineering Part A 2020, 26, 688–701. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 135.Yagi S; Galea LA Sex differences in hippocampal cognition and neurogenesis. Neuropsychopharmacology 2019, 44, 200–213. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 136.Westenbroek C; Den Boer JA; Veenhuis M; Ter Horst GJ Chronic stress and social housing differentially affect neurogenesis in male and female rats. Brain research bulletin 2004, 64, 303–308. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

No data was used for the research described in the article.

RESOURCES