Skip to main content
APL Bioengineering logoLink to APL Bioengineering
. 2026 Apr 2;10(2):021501. doi: 10.1063/5.0312953

Research advances in intelligent microenvironment-responsive hydrogels for myocardial infarction therapy

Jian Li 1, Jinglin Gao 2, Kaiyi Zhu 1,a), Yuping Gao 1,a)
PMCID: PMC13048829  PMID: 41940261

Abstract

Myocardial infarction (MI) poses a severe threat to human life and health. During acute MI, persistent myocardial ischemia and hypoxia induce pathological alterations in the microenvironment. Traditional therapeutic approaches exhibit limited capacity for targeted modulation of this infarcted microenvironment. Consequently, developing therapeutic strategies capable of precisely responding to the pathological microenvironment holds significant importance. Hydrogels, as a class of polymeric biomaterials with excellent biocompatibility, can be engineered into intelligent responsive hydrogels by incorporating environmentally responsive functional groups or constructing intelligent network architectures. These hydrogels are designed to sense and respond to key features of the MI pathological microenvironment, such as temperature, pH, reactive oxygen species, and enzyme concentrations. This review systematically summarizes the design strategies and research advances in intelligent responsive hydrogels for MI therapy over recent years, focusing on their distinct functional capabilities: alleviating oxidative damage, suppressing excessive inflammatory responses, enabling precise drug delivery, and modulating immune activity. Although current research predominantly remains at the preclinical stage and faces numerous challenges, the convergence of materials science and biomedical engineering positions smart responsive hydrogels as promising candidates to deliver innovative solutions for the precise treatment of MI.

I. INTRODUCTION

Myocardial infarction (MI), representing the most severe clinical manifestation of coronary artery disease, remains one of the leading causes of mortality worldwide.1,2 The underlying pathophysiology involves acute coronary occlusion, which results in regional myocardial ischemia and hypoxia.3 This disruption of oxygen and nutrient delivery triggers a cascade of biochemical and cellular events that ultimately lead to irreversible cardiomyocyte death.4 Current therapeutic strategies include pharmacological treatments, percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), and coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG).5 Although these interventions effectively restore coronary perfusion and improve cardiac performance, they are unable to regenerate lost myocardial tissue.6 This limitation maintains metabolic dysfunction within surviving cardiomyocytes, which, in turn, promotes adverse ventricular remodeling and progressive cardiac deterioration.7,8 Moreover, conventional pharmacological therapies are limited by poor targeting capability, short retention time, and the complex challenges arising from the dynamic changes of the microenvironment, making it difficult to achieve precise therapeutic regulation.9 These limitations highlight the urgent need for innovative therapeutic approaches that preserve viable myocardium, restore cardiac function, and prevent the transition to heart failure.

Recent advances in biomaterials science have introduced new possibilities for the diagnosis and treatment of MI. Emerging biomedical materials, including cardiac patches, hydrogels, nanobiomaterials, and vascular grafts, have shown significant potential in both experimental and clinical settings.10–12 In the diagnostic phase, it can monitor abnormal electrocardiogram signals and release drugs on demand, thereby significantly improving the clinical diagnosis and treatment efficiency of MI.13,14 In therapeutic contexts, they can serve as delivery platforms for drugs and bioactive molecules that modulate inflammation, regulate immune responses, promote angiogenesis, and suppress post-infarction fibrosis.15,16 Collectively, these functionalities provide promising strategies for precise intervention and functional cardiac repair.17,18 Among these materials, hydrogels have attracted particular attention in myocardial tissue engineering due to their excellent biocompatibility, tunable mechanical properties, three-dimensional porous structure, and similarity to the native extracellular matrix (ECM).19,20 When injected intramyocardially at the infarct site, appropriately engineered hydrogels form in situ physical scaffolds that reduce pathological ventricular remodeling and support tissue regeneration.21 By restoring the mechanical integrity of the myocardium and enhancing reparative processes, hydrogels contribute to improved cardiac function and better long-term outcomes for patients with MI.22,23

Intelligent responsive hydrogels, representing an advanced subclass of hydrogel-based biomaterials, preserve the inherent advantages of conventional hydrogels while integrating specific chemical bonds or functional groups that enable real-time and sensitive responses to dynamic changes in the post-infarction microenvironment.24–26 These properties allow precise and controlled release of therapeutic agents, thereby achieving more targeted and effective treatment of MI.27,28 During MI progression, the infarcted myocardium undergoes a series of pathological alterations, including tissue ischemia, hypoxia, abnormal reactive oxygen species (ROS) accumulation, pH fluctuations, excessive collagen deposition, and immune-inflammatory responses.29 These pathological characteristics not only indicate disease severity but also provide biological cues for the rational design of intelligent responsive hydrogels. By exploiting specific pathological signals such as elevated ROS levels, acidic pH, and overexpression of matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs), these hydrogels can achieve spatiotemporally controlled drug release at the lesion site.30,31 This mechanism enhances therapeutic efficacy and minimizes systemic side effects, thereby offering a promising avenue for the development of precision myocardial repair therapies.32

This review provides a comprehensive overview of the design principles, recent progress, and therapeutic potential of intelligent responsive hydrogels in the context of MI. Special emphasis is placed on their ability to enable precise, controlled, and adaptive drug delivery in response to pathological cues within the infarcted microenvironment. In addition, the functional advantages and existing challenges that limit the clinical translation of these materials are discussed. Finally, future perspectives and emerging strategies are proposed to overcome these limitations and to promote cardiovascular regeneration and improved clinical outcomes for patients with MI.

Literature search strategy: This narrative review was based on a comprehensive literature search of PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, and Google Scholar for publications from January 2010 to October 2025. Search terms included “myocardial infarction,” “intelligent hydrogel,” “responsive hydrogel,” “stimuli-responsive,” “pH-responsive,” “ROS-responsive,” “MMP-responsive,” “thermoresponsive,” “drug delivery,” and “cardiac repair.” We primarily included original research articles and selected reviews providing critical mechanistic or translational insights. Inclusion criteria were: (1) studies on intelligent responsive hydrogels for MI therapy; (2) English-language publications; (3) peer-reviewed articles with clear material design and therapeutic outcome descriptions. Exclusion criteria included: (1) conventional non-responsive hydrogels; (2) non-MI cardiovascular diseases; (3) conference abstracts or reviews without original data. While not following a systematic review protocol, the selection process was guided by these criteria to ensure comprehensive coverage of representative, high-quality studies, illustrating key design principles and therapeutic strategies in this field.

II. DESIGN PRINCIPLES OF INTELLIGENT RESPONSIVE HYDROGELS

A comprehensive understanding of the dynamic evolution of the pathological microenvironment during MI is fundamental to the rational design of polymer networks that can achieve spatiotemporally controlled release of therapeutic agents. In this context, intelligent responsive hydrogels, which are constructed from functional polymer backbones and cross-linking moieties, exhibit environment-specific disassembly behaviors when exposed to pathological conditions characteristic of MI.33,34 For instance, certain dynamic covalent bonds or supramolecular cross-linking structures remain stable under physiological pH but undergo rapid dissociation in acidic microenvironments, thereby enabling the precise release of encapsulated drugs at the infarct site.35,36 Similarly, hydrogels that incorporate ROS-responsive groups, such as disulfide bonds or boronate esters, undergo oxidative degradation in the presence of elevated ROS levels.37 This process not only allows controlled release of therapeutic payloads but also contributes to local ROS scavenging, thereby exerting dual therapeutic effects.38,39 In addition, MMP-responsive hydrogels, which are engineered with MMP-cleavable peptide sequences, are selectively degraded by these enzymes that are overexpressed in the infarcted myocardium.40,41 This enzymatic responsiveness induces localized structural changes in the hydrogel network, promoting site-specific accumulation and targeted delivery of bioactive agents.42 The following sections provide an in-depth discussion of the pathological features of the MI microenvironment, the fundamental design strategies underlying stimuli-responsive hydrogel systems, and the latest advancements in preclinical and clinical research (Fig. 1). Collectively, these insights aim to inform future directions in the development of intelligent biomaterial-based cardiac therapies.

FIG. 1.

FIG. 1.

Schematic illustration of the design strategies and therapeutic mechanisms of intelligent microenvironment-responsive hydrogels for MI treatment.

A. pH-responsive hydrogels

1. pH dynamics in the MI microenvironment

Under normal physiological conditions, cardiomyocytes primarily rely on aerobic metabolism to generate Adenosine Triphosphate (ATP). However, during MI, coronary artery obstruction induces local myocardial ischemia and hypoxia, forcing cells to shift from aerobic to anaerobic metabolism.43,44 This metabolic shift is accompanied by substantial lactate production, which subsequently dissociates into lactate and H+.45 The rapid accumulation of H+ in the ischemic region decreases intracellular pH to approximately 6.0–6.5, thereby creating a locally acidic microenvironment.46,47 In addition, impaired ischemic conditions hinder the timely clearance of CO2 generated by cardiomyocyte metabolism. CO2 reacts with water to form carbonic acid, which further dissociates into H+, exacerbating intracellular acidification.48 The resulting acidosis triggers a cascade of pathological responses: accumulated H+ activates the Na+/H+ exchanger (NHE), which extrudes H+ in exchange for Na+ influx. This exchange causes intracellular Na+ overload and subsequently drives the Na+/Ca2+ exchanger (NCX) to operate in the reverse mode, leading to Ca2+ influx.49,50 The resultant calcium overload activates calcium-dependent proteases, endonucleases, and phospholipases, ultimately promoting apoptosis and necrosis. Furthermore, the acidic environment destabilizes lysosomal membranes, releasing acid hydrolases that further compromise cellular integrity.51 These pH alterations not only represent a pathophysiological hallmark of MI but also provide a compelling biochemical rationale for the design of pH-responsive hydrogel systems.

2. Design principles of pH-responsive hydrogels

a. pH-sensitive group chemical responsiveness.

pH-responsive hydrogels are engineered with acid-labile chemical linkages such as imines, hydrazones, and boronate esters that undergo reversible hydrolysis under acidic conditions, thereby enabling the controlled release of encapsulated therapeutic agents56–58 (Table I). Imine bonds, formed by the condensation of an aldehyde and a primary amine group, exhibit dynamic reversibility and pH-tunable stability, making them valuable linkages in the hydrogel design.59 They remain stable under physiological pH (7.4), maintaining network integrity and preventing premature drug release. Within the mildly acidic microenvironment of infarcted myocardium, protonation of the imine nitrogen increases its susceptibility to hydrolysis, resulting in C=N bond cleavage and subsequent network degradation [Fig. 2(A-a)]. UV-Vis spectroscopic analysis revealed pronounced spectral changes during imine bond cleavage, where the absorbance intensity at 240–340 nm increased markedly at pH 5.0 compared with pH 7.5 [Figs. 2(A-b)–2(A-c)]. Moreover, pH-dependent release kinetics showed strong sensitivity to acidic conditions, with significantly accelerated drug release at pH 5.5, confirming the pH-responsive degradation mechanism [Fig. 2(A-d)]. This selective, acid-sensitive response underscores their potential for controlled and localized therapy in cardiac repair applications. For instance, Li et al. developed an injectable hydrogel, Gel@MSN/miR-21-5p, composed of functional mesoporous silica nanoparticles (MSNs) and microRNA-21-5p encapsulated within a hydrogel matrix.60 The matrix is formed from amino-functionalized MSN and aldehyde-terminated polyethylene glycol (PEGCHO). The positively charged MSN binds to miR-21-5p, while the aldehyde groups of PEGCHO react with the amino groups on MSN through imine (Schiff base) cross-linking, resulting in the formation of a stable hydrogel network. According to in vitro studies, the sol-to-gel phase transition of this system was completed in about 5 min. When the hydrogel is injected into the MI site, the locally acidic microenvironment breaks the imine bonds, causing degradation of the hydrogel matrix and the consequent release of MSN/miR-21-5p complexes, which promote immunoregulation and angiogenesis. It should be noted that the optimal therapeutic time window of the hydrogel has not yet been clearly defined in this study. Further optimization of the Gel@MSN/miR-21-5p dosage, along with long-term efficacy and safety evaluations, is required to facilitate its eventual translation into clinical applications. Similarly, Cheng et al. reported a pH-responsive conductive hydrogel fabricated via Schiff base reactions between oxidized hyaluronic acid (OHA) and carboxylated multi-walled carbon nanotube (MWCNT)-modified collagen (Col-CDH)61 [Fig. 3(a)]. When both OHA and Col-CDH were at a concentration of 10%, the gelation time was approximately 20 s, ensuring rapid in situ gel formation and good injectability. In vitro results showed that both metformin and exosomes exhibited faster release at pH 6.8 than at pH 7.0. Owing to the amino groups in metformin and the acid-sensitive imine bonds in the hydrogel, metformin showed a more pronounced initial release. This reversible linkage enables pH-responsive, intelligent release while maintaining bioactivity and therapeutic efficacy [Fig. 3(b)]. In another study, Li et al. designed a conductive and bioadhesive hydrogel through dynamic cross-linking of dopamine-functionalized gelatin (Gel-DA) with cyclodextrin-modified Pluronic F127 (F127-CHO), incorporating polydopamine–polypyrrole (PDAPpy) nanoparticles to enhance electrical conductivity, mechanical strength, and tissue adhesion62 [Figs. 3(c) and 3(d)]. The incorporation of PDA–PPy also accelerated the gelation process of the hydrogel, enabling FGPP4 to achieve rapid gelation within 2 min. Thermosensitive F127 micelles were used to encapsulate astragaloside IV (AST), while the pH-responsive Schiff base linkages ensured targeted release within the infarcted myocardium. This system effectively activated the Nrf2/HO-1 signaling pathway, inhibited hypoxia-induced ferroptosis, and improved post-infarction cardiac function [Figs. 3(e) and 3(f)]. The hydrogel showed a sustained-release effect for AST, but the release amount remains difficult to control precisely. Future studies will develop more controllable systems and explore the addition of other active components, such as vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) or stem cells, to improve cardiac repair.

TABLE I.

Microenvironment-responsive chemical bonds: degradation mechanisms, kinetics, and release characteristics.

Responsive chemical bonds Chemical structure Stimulus type in MI Bond dissociation mechanism Degradation kinetics Release characteristics References
Imine (Schiff base) R1-CH=N-R2 pH < 6.5 Acid-catalyzed hydrolysis
Nucleophilic addition of water to protonated imine
pH > 7.0 t1/2 6–12 h
pH < 5.0 t1/2 1–3 h
Sustained pH-responsive release; reversible gelation enables self-healing and adaptability 58 and 59
Boronate ester Ar-B(OR)2B(OR)3 pH < 7.4ROS pH: reversible hydrolysis
ROS: irreversible oxidation
pH 6.5–7.0 slow
pH < 5.0 faster
1 mM H2O2 t1/2 5 min
10 mM H2O2 t1/2 70 s
pH/ROS dual-responsive release
Higher physiological stability and specific release ability of the lesion
206–208
Diselenide R1-Se-Se-R2 ROS R1-Se-Se-R2 + H2O2 → [R1-Se(O)-Se-R2] → R1-SeOH + R2-SeOH; R1-SeOH + H2O2 → R1-SeO2H + H2O H2O2 t1/2 about 30 min–2 h Sustained and controlled ROS-responsive irreversible release 209 and 210
Thioketal R1-S-C(CH3)2-S-R2 ROS ROS oxidation of sulfur oxides
Hydrolysis and cleavage of the C–S bond
H2O2 t1/2 11–20 h ROS-responsive release ROS scavenger 211 and 212
FIG. 2.

FIG. 2.

Schematic illustration of the environmentally responsive degradation mechanisms of imine, boronate ester, diselenide, and thioketal linkages. (A) (a) Schematic illustration of the degradation of pH-responsive imine crosslinkers under acidic conditions, resulting in the release of cinnamaldehyde. (b) and (c) UV-visible absorption spectra of the system. (d) Cumulative release profiles of cinnamaldehyde at pH 5.0 and pH 7.4. Reproduced with permission from Han et al., ACS Appl. Bio Mater. 4, 2465–2474 (2021). Copyright 2021 ACS Publications.52 (B) Schematic illustration of the dissolution mechanisms of arylboronate ester-crosslinked hydrogels. The network can be disrupted by lowering the pH, introducing diol-containing molecules, or exposure to ROS. The ROS-triggered cleavage of arylboronate esters is irreversible, whereas the effects induced by pH or diols are reversible. Reproduced with permission from Han et al., J. Mater. Chem. B, 10, 6263 (2022). Copyright 2022 Royal Society of Chemistry.53 (C) (a) TK bonds are formed via the reaction between thiols and ketones. (b) TK bonds can be cleaved by ROS. Reproduced with permission from Rinaldi et al., Polymers 14, 687 (2022). Licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license/Copyright 2022 MDPI.54 (D) Schematic illustration of the pH/oxidation dual‐triggered degradation of PDOX, leading to the release of selenious acid (DOX‐SeOOH). Reproduced with permission from Hu et al., Molecules 29, 3837 (2024). Licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license/Copyright 2024 MDPI.55

FIG. 3.

FIG. 3.

Application of pH-responsive hydrogels in the treatment of MI. (a) Schematic illustration of the preparation and composition of Gel@MSN/miR-21-5p hydrogel. (b) Release profiles of metformin and exosomes from the hydrogel under pH 6.8 and pH 7.4 conditions. Reproduced with permission from Cheng et al., Adv. Sci. 12, 2410590 (2025). Licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license/Copyright 2025 Wiley.61 (c) The schematic illustrates the formation of F127-CHO-GelDA through a Schiff base reaction between F127-CHO and GelDA. (d) The FGPP1 hydrogel maintained strong adhesion to cardiac tissue even after bending and twisting and exhibited excellent adhesion on various substrates (skin, paper, polyethylene, and iron) as well as in vivo cardiac tissue after MI surgery. (e) Compared with the MI group, the FGPP1@AST hydrogel group showed markedly increased expression of ferroptosis-related proteins (xCT, GPX4, and FTH-1) and Nrf2/HO-1 pathway proteins. (f) Representative echocardiographic images of hearts from different groups at two weeks after MI and following treatment. Reproduced with permission from Li et al., J. Controlled Release 384, 113874 (2025). Copyright 2025 Elsevier.62 (g) Schematic illustration of the preparation process of the PSTM/Adipose-Derived Stem Cell (ADSC) hydrogel. (h) Comparison of electrical conductivity and elastic modulus among PS, PST, and PSTM(x) hydrogels. (i) The NADH scavenging activity of the PSTM hydrogel was measured at pH 6.5, 7.4, and 8.8 using a colorimetric assay. Reproduced with permission from Chen et al., Research 8, 0973 (2025). Licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license/Copyright 2025 Research.63

Boronate ester bonds represent a class of multifunctional, stimuli-responsive linkages that show dual sensitivity to pH and ROS.56 This unique feature makes them particularly well suited for addressing the complex pathological microenvironment of MI, which is characterized by acidosis and oxidative stress. These dynamic B–O bonds are formed through the reversible condensation of boronic acids with cis-diol compounds and can undergo cleavage by hydrolysis under acidic conditions or by oxidation in the presence of ROS. Boronate-based hydrogels can be designed as either reversible or irreversible crosslinked networks, each showing distinct degradation behaviors in response to environmental stimuli [Fig. 2(B)]. Their dual responsiveness to pH and ROS enables controlled drug release, allowing a rapid burst of antioxidants during acute oxidative stress followed by sustained release as tissue recovery progresses. In addition, the reversible nature of boronate linkages confers self-healing ability and good biocompatibility, since the resulting degradation products exhibit low cytotoxicity and can be readily metabolized and eliminated. For instance, Luo et al. fabricated a hydrogel using 2-formylphenylboronic acid (2-FPBA) as a crosslinker, forming Schiff bases with quaternized carboxymethyl chitosan (QCMCS) and boronate esters with tannic acid (TA).64 Elevated ROS in ischemic regions cleaved boronate bonds, while acidic pH destabilized both linkages, triggering the release of S1QEL1.1 and FT011 to attenuate myocardial injury. Chen et al. designed a multifunctional hydrogel integrating metabolic, electrical, and mechanical regulation.63 The PVA/OSA/borax/tannic acid hydrogel (PSTM) was crosslinked through boronate ester bonds, enabling adaptive mechanical strength and conductivity under acidic conditions [Figs. 3(g) and 3(h)]. At pH 6.5, the hydrogel exhibited the highest NADH scavenging activity, confirming that the borate ester bonds in the system respond to the acidic environment, triggering the release of embedded MXene-TA nanozymes to catalyze the oxidation of NADH to NAD+ [Fig. 3(i)]. This process improved myocardial energy metabolism, enhanced stem cell viability and electrical coupling, and ultimately restored cardiac function after injury.

b. pH-responsive materials.

pH-responsive materials, a specialized subclass of stimuli-responsive polymers, can dynamically modulate their physicochemical properties in response to variations in environmental pH.65 This adaptive behavior provides distinct advantages for the drug delivery system design, enabling site-specific and temporally controlled release of therapeutic agents. By leveraging the pH gradients that exist between healthy and pathological tissues or among intracellular compartments, these materials facilitate targeted drug delivery with enhanced bioavailability and reduced off-target effects, thereby improving therapeutic efficacy while minimizing systemic toxicity.66,67

Poly(acrylic acid) (PAA), synthesized through the polymerization of acrylic acid monomers, is one of the most extensively studied pH-responsive polymers because of its high density of ionizable carboxyl groups (–COOH) along the polymer backbone.68 These functional groups undergo reversible protonation and deprotonation in response to environmental pH fluctuations, which underpin the pH sensitivity of PAA. With an intrinsic pKa of approximately 4.25, PAA remains predominantly protonated under acidic conditions (pH < 4.25) and becomes progressively deprotonated as the pH exceeds this threshold. Within the pH range of 4.0–6.4, deprotonation of carboxyl groups induces electrostatic repulsion among polymer chains, leading to network expansion and increased hydrogel swelling.69 At higher pH levels, counterions partially screen these repulsive interactions, thereby reducing the swelling capacity.70 This responsive swelling behavior enables PAA-based hydrogels to dynamically regulate their physical state and to achieve controlled release of encapsulated agents, demonstrating significant potential for MI therapy. Garbern et al. developed a dual pH and temperature-responsive injectable hydrogel based on the terpolymer p(NIPAAm-co-PAA-co-BA), composed of N-isopropylacrylamide (NIPAM), acrylic acid (AA), and butyl acrylate (BA).71 In this system, NIPAM imparts thermosensitivity, whereas PAA introduces pH responsiveness, enabling the hydrogel to transform from a sol to a gel state at 37 °C under acidic conditions characteristic of ischemic myocardial tissue. This property facilitates localized and sustained delivery of basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF), thereby promoting angiogenesis and cardiac repair. At 28 days post-surgery, a chronic inflammatory response was observed near the polymer injection site, warranting further investigation into its duration and potential effects on angiogenesis and cardiac function. Future studies should strengthen safety evaluations, including assessments of potential side effects, toxicity, and long-term complications. In another study, Shahid et al. fabricated a pH-sensitive nanocomposite hydrogel (NCH) for ticagrelor (TG) delivery via free-radical polymerization of chitosan (CH) and AA, using N,N′-methylenebisacrylamide (MBAA) as the crosslinker and potassium persulfate (KPS) as the initiator, with incorporation of thiolated chitosan (TCH)-based nanoparticles.72 The resulting NCH exhibited pH-dependent drug release, improved bioavailability, an extended half-life, and an increased area under the plasma concentration–time curve (AUC). By reducing dosing frequency and effectively inhibiting platelet aggregation, this system represents a promising therapeutic platform for MI management with enhanced patient compliance. It is worth noting that this study mainly examined the in vitro and in vivo release behavior of NCHs, but their stability requires further investigation. Although the prepared NCHs showed pH-responsive properties, they lacked targeting ability. Future research should consider linking NCHs with targeting ligands to improve delivery efficiency at specific sites.

These studies indicate that pH-responsive hydrogels can effectively utilize the acidic microenvironment of infarcted myocardium to achieve controlled drug release and targeted cardiac repair. By combining tunable chemical linkages with bioactive components, these materials promote angiogenesis, regulate inflammation, and improve cardiac function after myocardial infarction. However, regional differences in myocardial pH may lead to variations in degradation behavior and drug release profiles in vivo, highlighting the need for more precise spatiotemporal control. Furthermore, the structural stability, reproducibility, and scalability of multifunctional hydrogels require further optimization to meet clinical translation requirements. Future research should emphasize hydrogels with multiple stimuli responsiveness and feedback-regulated release mechanisms, integrating 3D bioprinting and injectable microgel technologies for controllable cardiac repair. Developing multi-level pH-sensitive systems with diverse pKa linkages will better match infarct evolution. pH gradient microfluidics, isotope tracking, and cardiac co-culture models can elucidate structure–function correlations, providing optimization strategies that advance these materials from bench to bedside for MI treatment.

B. ROS-responsive hydrogels

1. ROS dynamics in the MI microenvironment

ROS is single-electron reduction products of oxygen in vivo, primarily including superoxide anion (O2−), hydrogen peroxide (H2O2), and hydroxyl radical (• OH).73 Their dynamic fluctuations are closely associated with pathological processes in the body. At low or physiological levels, ROS acts as signaling molecules participating in intracellular signal transduction within cardiac cells, regulating physiological activities such as cardiomyocyte growth, proliferation, and differentiation.74 However, during MI, particularly following myocardial reperfusion, ROS concentrations in ischemic myocardium surge to levels tens of times higher than normal, inducing oxidative stress, disrupting cell membranes, and ultimately leading to cell death.75,76

Under cardiac physiological conditions, ROS generation mainly originates from the mitochondrial electron transport system, xanthine oxidase-catalyzed reactions, NADPH oxidase (NOX)-mediated oxidation processes, and nitric oxide (NO) synthase metabolic activity.77 During MI, ischemia impedes mitochondrial oxidative phosphorylation, increasing electron leakage from complexes I and III of the electron transport chain, directly generating O2−.78 In the process of myocardial I/R, xanthine oxidase activity is significantly enhanced, catalyzing the oxidation of hypoxanthine and xanthine to produce O2− and H2O2, becoming a major source of ROS.79 Additionally, infiltrating neutrophils and macrophages in the infarct zone generate substantial ROS through NOX catalysis.80 In certain cases, endothelial nitric oxide synthase undergoes uncoupling, producing O2− instead of NO. Excessive ROS exhibits potent oxidative activity, attacking biological macromolecules such as cell membranes, proteins, and nucleic acids, leading to cardiomyocyte injury and death, thereby exacerbating myocardial tissue damage.73 Therefore, antioxidant therapeutic strategies targeting ROS, such as ROS-responsive hydrogels, hold significant clinical importance in the treatment of MI.

2. Design principles of ROS-responsive hydrogels

ROS-responsive hydrogels designed for MI therapy can generally be classified into three major design strategies. (1) Bond-based systems, which employ ROS-labile linkages such as diselenides, boronate esters, or thioacetals that undergo oxidative cleavage; (2) Material-based systems, which rely on the intrinsic physicochemical transformations of ROS-sensitive polymers; and (3) Composite systems, which incorporate exogenous ROS scavengers to enhance antioxidant capacity. These strategies share a common goal of targeted drug delivery and attenuation of oxidative stress.

a. ROS-sensitive chemical bonds.

To achieve targeted drug release within the oxidative stress-enriched microenvironment of MI, some ROS-responsive hydrogels rely on the oxidative cleavage of specific chemical bonds. This section focuses on three commonly used ROS-labile linkages: diselenide, boronate ester, and thioketal. Each type exhibits distinct degradation kinetics, and under elevated ROS levels, these bonds undergo oxidative scission, triggering controlled therapeutic release while also contributing to ROS scavenging and antioxidative effects81–83 (Table I). The diselenide (Se–Se) bond is a highly ROS-responsive linkage in smart hydrogel systems. ROS such as H2O2 oxidizes the Se–Se bond, generating hydrophilic selenic acid that converts the hydrophobic diselenide into water-soluble selenium oxide, leading to rapid network breakdown and drug release55 [Fig. 2(D)]. Because of its low bond energy (∼172 kJ mol−1), the Se–Se bond reacts sensitively to pathological oxidative stress. The oxidation product, selenic acid, can also catalyze ROS scavenging, providing a self-regulating antioxidant effect.84 In contrast, proton-induced degradation serves only as a secondary pathway. The pronounced ROS responsiveness of the diselenide bond enables targeted degradation within infarcted myocardium, making it a promising platform for localized drug delivery and oxidative stress therapy. Wang et al. developed an injectable ROS-scavenging hydrogel composed of cyclodextrin (CD)-terminated diselenide hyperbranched polymer (HSe-CD), CD-modified hyaluronic acid (HA-CD), adamantane-modified HA (HA-Ad), and miR-19a/b-cholesterol85 (Fig. 4). Due to the high ROS sensitivity of diselenide bonds, the hydrogel injected into the infarcted myocardium gradually degraded, enabling the specific and sustained release of miR-19a/b. This system effectively attenuated inflammation, reduced apoptosis and cardiac fibrosis, and promoted functional recovery in post-MI rat models. At day 5 post-injection in MI rats, Ki67, pH3, and Aurora B staining showed that the R+/miR hydrogel markedly increased cardiomyocyte proliferation, confirming the synergistic effect of ROS-scavenging hydrogel and miR-19a/b [Fig. 5(a)]. The synergistic effect between this intelligent responsive hydrogel and the loaded drug or mRNA holds significant innovative potential for improving cardiac function after MI.

FIG. 4.

FIG. 4.

Schematic illustration of the synthesis of miR‐19a/b@HA‐Ad/HA‐CD/HSe‐CD hydrogel and its injection into the infarcted region of a porcine heart. The hydrogel achieves ROS‐responsive sustained release of miR‐19a/b via diselenide bonds, effectively promoting cardiomyocyte proliferation, scavenging excessive ROS in the MI microenvironment, and thereby improving inflammation and cardiac function. Reproduced with permission from Wang et al., Biomaterials 312, 122732 (2025). Copyright 2025 Elsevier.85

FIG. 5.

FIG. 5.

Application of ROS-responsive hydrogels in the treatment of MI. (a) Representative images and quantitative analysis of Ki67, pH3, and Aurora B staining in cardiomyocytes and non-cardiomyocytes from MI rats on day 5, showing enhanced cardiomyocyte proliferation in hearts treated with the R+/miR hydrogel. Reproduced with permission from Wang et al., Biomaterials 312, 122732 (2025). Copyright 2025 Elsevier.85 (b) Schematic illustration of the synthesis of the ROS-responsive CS-B-NO hydrogel and its therapeutic application in myocardial I/R injury. (c) In vitro degradation of the CS-B-NO hydrogel with or without H2O2 (100 μM). The residual weight of the dried hydrogel was recorded at various time points to evaluate degradation behavior. (d) In vitro cumulative NO release from CS-B-NO hydrogel (5 mg) in 5 ml PBS (pH 7.4) containing various concentrations of H2O2. Reproduced with permission from Hao et al., Adv. Sci. 9, 2105408 (2022). Licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license/Copyright 2022 Wiley.86 (e) 1H NMR spectra of 4-arm-PEG-SG and PAMB-G-TK. (f) Release of S1P/SS-31/Lipo from hydrogels at PBS, 0.1, and 0.5 mM H2O2 concentrations. (g) TEM images of the infarcted mitochondrial structure. Reproduced with permission from Zheng et al., Adv. Healthcare Mater. 11, 2200990 (2022). Copyright 2022 Wiley.91

As discussed in Sec. II A 2 a, boronate ester bonds are responsive to changes in both pH and ROS. In contrast to reversible pH-dependent hydrolysis, oxidation by ROS is an irreversible process because boric acid, formed as the oxidation product, cannot react with diols to regenerate boronate esters under physiological conditions [Fig. 2(B)]. This mechanism enables continuous drug release once oxidative stress occurs. Moreover, the oxidative degradation pathway itself helps to scavenge excessive ROS in the infarcted myocardium, offering dual therapeutic effects through regulated drug delivery and inherent antioxidant activity. The combined features of pH and ROS responsiveness, irreversible oxidation behavior, and natural ROS-neutralizing ability set boronate ester bonds apart from other ROS-responsive linkages and make them promising candidates for adaptive drug release in cardiac repair. Hao et al. developed a hydrogel named CS-B-NO, which possesses dual functions of ROS responsiveness and nitric oxide (NO) release86 [Fig. 5(b)]. In this system, boronate ester groups act as protective moieties and react with azide-modified diols through ozonide coupling to form a small-molecule NO donor (B-NO). The resulting B-NO moieties are then grafted onto the side chains of natural chitosan (CS) via a click reaction, yielding the CS-B-NO hydrogel. In vitro degradation experiments demonstrated that the CS-B-NO hydrogel remained stable in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), whereas the presence of H2O2 accelerated its decomposition, suggesting that oxidative stress facilitates hydrogel degradation [Fig. 5(c)]. With increasing H2O2 levels, the hydrogel exhibited gradual and sustained NO release, which can be ascribed to the strong ROS sensitivity of the boronate ester bonds [Fig. 5(d)]. This ROS-responsive design enables the hydrogel to both scavenge excessive ROS and release NO in a controlled manner, providing combined antioxidative and therapeutic effects, thereby mitigating myocardial I/R injury. However, the ischemic duration used in this study was limited to 30 min. Future studies could extend the ischemia period to better mimic clinical myocardial I/R conditions and evaluate the therapeutic efficacy of the CS-B-NO hydrogel under more severe ischemic injury. It is also important to determine the optimal therapeutic window for achieving the best treatment outcomes. In another study, Shen et al. constructed a melatonin (MLT)-loaded hydrogel by cross-linking polyvinyl alcohol (PVA) with a boronate-containing crosslinker-N1-(4-boronobenzyl)-N3-(4-boronophenyl)-N1, N1, N3, N3-tetramethylpropane-1,3-diamine (TSPBA) via boronate ester bonds.87 ROS-induced cleavage of these bonds in infarcted tissue triggered on-demand MLT release, thereby reducing systemic side effects, improving bioavailability, and achieving precise treatment of myocardial I/R injury.

Analogous to boronate esters, the thioketal (TK) bond is an important ROS-responsive linkage characterized by a central quaternary carbon atom flanked by two thioether groups [R1SC(CH3)2–S–R2]. This structure has been widely employed in the design of smart hydrogels for myocardial repair88 [Fig. 2(C)]. When exposed to ROS, thioketal groups undergo cleavage, generating two thiol compounds: acetone and oxygen. Such ROS-triggered degradation enables controllable drug release and simultaneously scavenges pathological ROS, thereby alleviating oxidative stress. In addition, thioketal synthesis is straightforward, and the resulting materials show excellent biocompatibility.89 By tuning the hydrophilicity or hydrophobicity of the thiolated components, the swelling and degradation behavior of the hydrogel can be precisely regulated, making thioketal chemistry a versatile tool for constructing multifunctional delivery systems in cardiac tissue repair.90 Zheng et al. developed a liposome-composite hydrogel——poly-3-amino-4-methoxybenzoic acid withTK-NH2-modified gelatin (PAMB-G-TK) crosslinked via TK bonds for the co-delivery of mitochondria-targeted SS-31 peptides and sphingosine-1-phosphate (S1P).91 The hydrogel precursor solution containing 3% (w/v) PAMB-G-TK and 1.5% (w/v) four-arm-PEG-succinimidyl glutarate ester (PEG-SG) exhibited a gelation time of 30–50 s, making it particularly suitable for intramyocardial injection. The (1H NMR) spectrum verified the successful synthesis of PAMB-G-TK [Fig. 5(e)]. In vitro release analysis showed that S1P/SS-31/Lipo reached about 95% release under 0.5 mM H2O2 within 14 days, much higher than at 0.1 mM H2O2, confirming that liposome release from the hydrogel depends on ROS levels [Fig. 5(f)]. Furthermore, on day 3 after myocardial infarction, TEM analysis showed that treatment with the S1P/SS-31/Lipo-loaded hydrogel markedly improved mitochondrial morphology and integrity, thereby mitigating cardiomyocyte injury [Fig. 5(g)]. In a rat MI model, this hydrogel exhibited pronounced therapeutic efficacy by scavenging excessive ROS, restoring mitochondrial function, and promoting angiogenesis, ultimately enhancing myocardial repair and functional recovery.

In summary, the strategic incorporation of chemical bonds with ROS-labile properties enables the design of hydrogels that undergo site-specific degradation and controlled drug release in oxidative stress environments. These systems provide a promising therapeutic platform for the targeted treatment of MI, combining controlled delivery with intrinsic ROS-scavenging capabilities to achieve synergistic cardioprotection. Despite encouraging outcomes, several challenges limit clinical translation. The balance between ROS elimination and physiological redox signaling remains unclear, and excessive antioxidant activity may hinder macrophage polarization, fibroblast activation, and endothelial migration essential for repair. The proposed synergy between ROS-scavenging hydrogels and therapeutic agents lacks mechanistic support. Moreover, irreversible boronate ester oxidation, though enabling continuous release, fails to adjust to fluctuating oxidative stress after infarction, potentially causing early drug exhaustion and insufficient support during later healing. For true clinical translation to be realized, these challenges need to be critically evaluated and overcome.

b. ROS-responsive materials.

Building upon the mechanisms of ROS-labile chemical bonds, another design strategy focuses on the intrinsic physicochemical responsiveness of materials themselves. Polymers possessing both hydrophilic and hydrophobic properties are commonly employed in the design of ROS-responsive hydrogels.92 In the absence of ROS, the hydrophobic segments interact to maintain the hydrogel in an aggregated state with low solubility. However, upon exposure to ROS, these hydrophobic domains undergo oxidative reactions that convert them into hydrophilic moieties.93 This transformation disrupts the original hydrophobic interactions, thereby increasing the overall hydrophilicity and solubility of the hydrogel.94 Consequently, this structural change triggers the release of encapsulated drugs or cytokines. Based on this principle, Luo et al. developed a hydrogel composed of a methoxy polyethylene glycol-poly(L-methionine-co-L-alanine) (PMA) copolymer and the immunomodulatory drug FTY720.95 At the site of MI, the methionine units within the PMA act as antioxidants, scavenging ROS. Simultaneously, the thioether groups in their side chains are oxidized by ROS, inducing a transition of PMA from hydrophobic to hydrophilic. This gel-to-sol transformation enables controlled, ROS-dependent release of the encapsulated FTY720. Such a release mechanism ensures targeted drug delivery to the site of myocardial reperfusion injury, thereby enhancing drug utilization efficiency. It effectively inhibits cardiomyocyte apoptosis, modulates macrophage polarization, and attenuates inflammation while promoting angiogenesis. Similarly, Wang et al. designed an ROS-responsive, crosslinked polyvinyl alcohol-N1-(4-boronobenzyl)-N3-(4-boronophenyl)-N1,N1,N3,N3-tetramethylpropane-1,3-diamine (PVA-TSPBA) hydrogel capable of encapsulating an IL-1β-targeting nanobody.96 In the ROS-rich microenvironment of MI, oxidation of the TSPBA moieties led to hydrogel degradation and facilitated the precise, controlled release of the nanobody. The hydrophilic–hydrophobic transition mechanism of ROS-responsive hydrogels offers a versatile strategy for the targeted delivery of drugs and cytokines. By exploiting the elevated ROS concentrations in pathological tissues and the inherent ROS sensitivity of specific polymers, these systems achieve site-specific drug release, improved bioavailability, and enhanced therapeutic efficacy.

Amphiphilic polymer-based ROS-responsive hydrogels achieve effective drug delivery in MI regions through hydrophobic–hydrophilic transitions, leading to notable therapeutic benefits. However, this strategy, which relies on global hydrophobicity changes, may cause premature drug release under mild oxidative stress or incomplete release in severely necrotic areas with uneven ROS distribution. Future studies should quantify the transition kinetics under physiologically relevant ROS gradients and integrate spatial ROS mapping to guide polymer design, enabling delivery dynamics that better match cardiac pathological progression.

c. Integration of exogenous ROS scavengers.

Although the cleavage of ROS-sensitive chemical bonds enables targeted drug release and contributes to ROS neutralization, this intrinsic mechanism alone often provides limited antioxidant efficacy. To overcome this limitation, the incorporation of exogenous ROS scavengers into the hydrogel matrix has emerged as an effective strategy.97,98 These exogenous agents enhance the overall ROS-clearing capacity of the hydrogel, exert potent antioxidant activity, and synergize with the responsive polymeric network to more effectively modulate the pathological microenvironment.

Metallo-nanozymes, a class of nanomaterials with enzyme-like catalytic activity, typically possess a metal or metal oxide core, such as iron, copper, or manganese nanoparticles.99 By mimicking the catalytic functions of natural antioxidant enzymes, these nanozymes exhibit broad application potential in biomedicine.100 Hydrogels serve as ideal carriers for the localized delivery and controlled release of metallo-nanozymes, thereby prolonging their retention at infarcted sites and enhancing their antioxidant and tissue-reparative functions.101 Metal–organic frameworks (MOFs), such as zeolitic imidazolate framework-8 (ZIF-8), are porous crystalline structures self-assembled from metal ions and organic ligands.102,103 MOFs have attracted increasing attention in nanozyme fabrication due to their intrinsic biocompatibility, efficient catalytic activity, and the beneficial role of Zn2+ as a catalytic cofactor. Zhong et al. designed and synthesized a ZIF-8 nanozyme, which was further incorporated into sodium alginate to prepare a composite hydrogel [ALG-(ZIF-8)].104 The resulting hydrogel exhibited both superoxide dismutase (SOD)-like and catalase (CAT)-like enzymatic activities, enabling the efficient elimination of excessive ROS in the MI region. Moreover, ALG-(ZIF-8) effectively suppressed inflammatory responses, promoted angiogenesis, and modulated collagen remodeling, ultimately leading to improved cardiac function. Building upon this, Xu et al. proposed a biomimetic strategy by integrating polyphenols with metallo-nanozymes to construct tannic acid-coated Mn-Co3O4 (MCT) nanoparticles, which were embedded within an injectable collagen hydrogel.105

Beyond their potent ROS-scavenging capability, the MCT nanoparticles targeted mitochondria to suppress excessive ROS generation. This dual-functional system significantly reduced cellular apoptosis and inflammation while enhancing cardiac performance, offering new insights into the synergistic integration of nanozymes and natural biomaterials for myocardial repair.

Glutathione (GSH), an endogenous antioxidant composed of glutamate, cysteine, and glycine, plays a crucial role in ROS scavenging within biological systems.106 Its incorporation into hydrogel matrices can effectively suppress ROS generation and alleviate oxidative stress. However, the thiol group (–SH) in GSH exhibits high chemical reactivity and is readily affected by environmental factors such as light, temperature, and oxygen, leading to a reduction in antioxidant activity.107 To overcome this limitation, chemical modification strategies such as disulfide bond formation and the introduction of protective groups have been employed to enhance GSH stability.108 Li et al. further grafted GSH onto chitosan (CS) chains via amide bonds and combined it with a zero-length bioactive crosslinker to synthesize CSCleGSH copolymers.109 These copolymers were subsequently mixed with glycerophosphate and hydroxyethyl cellulose to fabricate an injectable CSCleGSH hydrogel. This design markedly improved the thermal stability of GSH, allowing it to maintain antioxidant activity within the hydrogel network. As a result, the system effectively inhibited oxidative stress-induced cardiomyocyte damage, demonstrating substantial potential for myocardial repair applications.

ROS-responsive hydrogels can further enhance antioxidant capacity by incorporating exogenous scavengers beyond conventional bond-cleavage mechanisms. However, the potential metal ion toxicity arising from sustained Zn2+/Mn2+ release and the impact of GSH modification on redox-cycling efficiency remain insufficiently studied. Future research should quantify the optimal scavenging threshold, evaluate the long-term toxicity associated with metal accumulation, and develop feedback-regulated systems that dynamically modulate antioxidant activity according to real-time ROS levels rather than continuous depletion.

C. MMP-responsive hydrogels

1. MMP dynamics in the MI microenvironment

MMPs are a family of zinc-dependent endopeptidases secreted by various cell types, including fibroblasts, vascular smooth muscle cells (VSMCs), and leukocytes.110 They play a crucial role in the degradation and remodeling of the ECM.111 Under pathological conditions such as MI, fibrotic diseases, osteoarthritis, and cancer, excessive MMP expression becomes a major contributor to tissue damage and disease progression.112,113 This dysregulation disturbs ECM homeostasis and accelerates pathological remodeling.

During MI, ischemia and hypoxia induce extensive apoptosis and necrosis of cardiomyocytes, subsequently initiating an inflammatory response. Inflammatory cells, including macrophages and neutrophils, infiltrate the infarcted region and release pro-inflammatory cytokines such as Tumor Necrosis Factor (TNF-α) and Interleukin-1 (IL-1), which stimulate the expression and activity of MMPs.114,115 As primary ECM-degrading enzymes, MMPs exhibit markedly elevated expression during MI, leading to excessive ECM degradation.116 Elevated MMP levels further amplify inflammatory cytokine production, forming a positive feedback loop that perpetuates MMP activation.117,118 However, sustained inflammatory stimulation also induces increased expression of tissue inhibitors of metalloproteinases (TIMPs), ultimately reducing the MMP/TIMP ratio and promoting maladaptive cardiac remodeling.114 Excessive ventricular remodeling causes ventricular wall thinning and dilation, severely compromising cardiac structure and function, leading to systolic and diastolic dysfunction.119 Moreover, MMPs regulate scar formation and myocardial fibrosis; dysregulated scarring impairs cardiac electrophysiological stability and mechanical integrity, thereby increasing the risk of arrhythmias and cardiac rupture.120 Consequently, targeting MMP activity represents a promising therapeutic strategy for MI, holding substantial clinical potential.

2. Design principles of MMP-responsive hydrogels

TIMPs, a critical class of regulatory proteins, primarily modulate MMP activity to maintain ECM homeostasis.121 They have been extensively investigated for treating adverse tissue remodeling driven by excessive MMP activity.122 By incorporating MMP-specific peptide sequences into hydrogels and loading TIMP-3 or therapeutic agents, site-specific degradation can be achieved exclusively in regions with elevated MMP expression.123 This strategy enables localized MMP inhibition, thereby modulating the pathological microenvironment and enabling targeted therapy. Building on this principle, Fan et al. engineered a dual-functional intelligent responsive hydrogel for on-demand growth factor release and MMP inhibition in MI zones124 [Fig. 6(a)]. The hydrogel, composed of collagen and GSH, was loaded with the fusion protein GST-TIMP-bFGF. In infarcted myocardium where the MMP-2/9 expression is upregulated, the TIMP peptide undergoes specific cleavage, releasing bFGF to promote angiogenesis and significantly improve post-infarction cardiac function. In vitro release studies demonstrated that bFGF release from the GST-TIMP-bFGF group was significantly higher than that observed in the absence of MMP-2 or in the presence of the MMP-2 inhibitor marimastat, confirming the hydrogel system's specific MMP-2-responsive release behavior [Fig. 6(b)]. Furthermore, bFGF release from the GST-TIMP-bFGF hydrogel gradually increased from day 3 to day 5, aligning with the upregulation pattern of MMP-2 following MI. This correlation further demonstrates that the hydrogel system dynamically responds to MMP-2 levels in the microenvironment to achieve sustained bFGF release [Figs. 6(c) and 6(d)]. Although collagen served as the biomaterial scaffold in this study, future investigations should consider integrating materials with improved biocompatibility, controllable degradation profiles, and optimized mechanical properties to enhance therapeutic efficacy. Furthermore, engineering drug release systems responsive to specific MMP subtypes could provide greater spatiotemporal control over therapeutic agent delivery. Similarly, Chen et al. developed an intelligent hydrogel system named MPGC4, which is composed of CTL4 consisting of carbon dots (CDots) and interleukin-4 plasmid DNA (IL4-pDNA), and an MMP-2/9-responsive polyethylene glycol (PEG) hydrogel (MPG)125 [Fig. 6(e)]. CTL4, serving as a composite gene nanocarrier, was encapsulated within the MPG network through a photopolymerization reaction. The crosslinked structure of MPG contains MMP-sensitive peptide chains, which enable the targeted release of CTL4 in the MI region with elevated MMP-2/9 expression. As the solid content of the hydrogel system increased, the gelation time decreased. At an 8% concentration of MPG, the gelation time was approximately 63 s, indicating a rapid sol–gel transition. In vitro assays demonstrated concentration-dependent acceleration of CTL4 release in response to increasing MMP-2 levels, confirming the enzyme-specific degradation mechanism of MPGC4 [Fig. 6(f)]. The released CTL4 from the degradable hydrogel system effectively inhibits MMP-2/9 expression [Fig. 6(g)], facilitates M2 macrophage polarization, reduces inflammatory responses, enhances therapeutic angiogenesis, and ultimately restores cardiac function.

FIG. 6.

FIG. 6.

Application of MMP-responsive hydrogels in the treatment of MI. (a) Schematic illustration of the preparation and MMP-responsive drug release mechanism of the Gel/GST-TIMP-bFGF hydrogel in a rat MI model. The fusion protein GST-TIMP-bFGF was prepared via recombinant expression and mixed with Gel-GSH (constructed by chemically cross-linking GSH), utilizing the specific GST–GSH interaction for coupling. Upon injection into the infarcted site, the hydrogel responds to upregulated MMP-2/9, leading to matrix degradation and the release of GST-TIMP-bFGF. The released protein subsequently inhibits MMP activity and promotes angiogenesis to treat myocardial infarction. (b) In vitro cumulative release kinetics of bFGF from the hydrogel system mediated by MMP-2 enzymatic degradation at various time points. (c) Western blot analysis showing the progressive upregulation of MMP-2 expression at different time points post-MI. (d) Cumulative bFGF release from the MMP-responsive hydrogel in vivo at various time points. Reproduced with permission from Fan et al., Adv. Mater. 31, 1902900 (2019). Copyright 2019 Wiley.124 (e) The synthesized four-armed polyethylene glycol-norbornene (tetra-PEG-NB) was dissolved with MMP-sensitive peptides in CTL4 solution to form the MPGC4 hydrogel system with a crosslinked network structure. (f) Cumulative release curves of CTL4 from MPGC4 hydrogel in MMP-2 solutions at different concentrations. (g) Quantitative PCR analysis of MMP-2 mRNA expression levels at days 1 and 3 following MI. Reproduced with permission from Chen et al., Adv. Mater. 35, 2209041 (2023). Copyright 2023 Wiley.125

Additionally, Wei et al. designed an injectable hydrogel integrating hyaluronic acid (HA), oxidized alginate (ALG-CHO), tetraaniline (TA), and DPCA nanoparticles.126 Here, TA imparts electrical conductivity, DPCA stabilizes HIF-1α, while ALG-CHO and HA provide structural support. The hydrogel was functionalized with MMP-sensitive peptides (MMP-SP) and polydopamine (PDA), enabling MMP-responsive degradation and sustained DPCA release. Following intramyocardial administration in infarcted rats, this system enhanced cardiac conductivity, significantly improved cardiac function, reduced fibrosis, and promoted angiogenesis (Fig. 7). To advance clinical translation, future studies must address several key challenges: optimizing the physicochemical properties and delivery kinetics of the hydrogel system, and comprehensively investigating the molecular mechanisms governing DPCA-mediated HIF-1α stabilization and its associated signaling cascades in the context of MI therapy.

FIG. 7.

FIG. 7.

Schematic diagram showing the fabrication of the ALG-CHO-TA/DPCA@PDA/MMP-SP/HA-SH hydrogel system and its therapeutic treatment following injection into the infarcted rat heart. The hydrogel was fabricated from functionalized HA and ALG, with TA incorporated into ALG-CHO for electrical conductivity and PDA-coated DPCA nanoparticles for high drug loading and sustained release. The multifunctional network was formed via cross-linking of ALG-CHO and DPCA@PDA with HA-SH and thiolated MMP-SP. When injected into the infarcted myocardium, the system provides intelligent, sustained DPCA release that stabilizes HIF-1α, thereby conferring multiple therapeutic benefits including inflammation suppression, angiogenic promotion, fibrosis reduction, and cardiac functional improvement. Reproduced with permission from Wei et al., Theranostics 12(1), 127–142 (2022). Licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license/Copyright 2022 Ivysping International Publisher.126

An alternative approach to controlled TIMP-3 delivery exploits the intrinsic biochemical properties of the protein itself. The C-terminal domain of TIMP-3 contains an abundance of lysine and arginine residues, which confer a net positive charge. These positively charged amino acids facilitate electrostatic interactions with the negatively charged sulfate groups on glycosaminoglycans, enabling the formation of stable molecular complexes.127 Leveraging this property, Burdick and colleagues developed an innovative strategy by engineering dextran sulfate (DS) as an anionic polymer and chemically modifying hyaluronic acid (HA) to introduce aldehyde (ALD) and hydrazide (HYD) functional groups.128 An injectable hydrogel network was constructed by conjugating hydrazide-terminated MMP-degradable peptides with negatively charged hyaluronic acid (HYD-HA), followed by cross-linking with aldehyde-functionalized hyaluronic acid (ALD-HA) through a Schiff base reaction. In this system, recombinant TIMP-3 (rTIMP-3), bearing a net positive charge, was stably incorporated into the hydrogel matrix through electrostatic interactions with the anionic polysaccharides. Upon intramyocardial injection, the elevated MMP activity in the infarcted myocardium specifically cleaved the MMP-sensitive peptide linkers, thereby disrupting the hydrogel's crosslinked structure and enabling controlled release of rTIMP-3. This targeted release strategy effectively suppressed MMP activity within the infarct zone and led to significant improvements in post-infarction left ventricular function.

Beyond protein and drug release applications, MMP-responsive hydrogels have also emerged as promising platforms for stem cell-based therapies in MI treatment.129 Human induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs), generated by reprogramming somatic cells to an embryonic stem cell-like pluripotent state, are widely utilized in cell therapy and tissue engineering. Effective cardiac repair using iPSCs requires precise differentiation into cardiomyocytes; however, current technologies struggle to achieve complete directed differentiation. Upon transplantation into infarcted myocardium, residual undifferentiated iPSCs may undergo aberrant proliferation and form tumors.130 Furthermore, challenges persist in achieving electrophysiological and structural integration between iPSC-derived cardiomyocytes (hiPS-CMs) and host cardiomyocytes, potentially leading to arrhythmic complications.131 Thus, critical modifications are essential to enhance the quality and safety of hiPS-CMs prior to clinical application for MI. To overcome these limitations, Li et al. developed an AuNP/HA composite hydrogel matrix loaded with hiPS-CMs.132 The hydrogel is based on a methacrylate-modified HA backbone and crosslinked via an MMP-2-cleavable peptide, enabling in situ degradation in response to the elevated MMP-2 activity present in ischemic myocardium. RGD peptides were incorporated to enhance biocompatibility. The incorporation of AuNPs is intended to modulate the stiffness and topological structure of the nanomatrix, thereby promoting gap junction formation in hiPS-CMs and regulating calcium handling through the αnβ1 integrin-mediated ILK-1/p-AKT/GATA4 signaling pathway. The results demonstrated that this hydrogel system improved cardiomyocyte electrophysiological and contractile function, enhanced cardiac performance in MI mice, reduced fibrosis, and promoted angiogenesis, thereby offering a novel biomaterial strategy for cardiac repair using hiPS‐CMs. However, this study only examined a single hiPS-CM dose, making it difficult to fully assess arrhythmia risk and long-term graft survival due to the short observation period. Future studies will optimize the AuNP-HA hydrogel, evaluate the safety of gradient hiPS-CM transplantation, and establish precise cell-tracking methods for real-time monitoring of cell fate.

Collectively, these studies underscore the versatility and therapeutic potential of MMP-responsive hydrogels in myocardial repair. Whether through the localized delivery of proteins, genes, small molecules, or stem cells, these intelligent biomaterials offer spatiotemporal control over therapeutic release and precise microenvironment modulation. However, it is worth noting that complete inhibition of MMP activity may impair the physiological tissue remodeling and angiogenesis essential for cardiac repair. Future studies should define the therapeutic window for MMP inhibition and integrate advanced cell-tracking technologies, such as bioluminescence imaging and MRI-detectable cell labeling, together with computational models based on patient-specific MMP profiles to predict release kinetics, ultimately enabling personalized biomaterial-based cardiac therapy.

D. Thermoresponsive hydrogels

Human body temperature exhibits regional heterogeneity, with pathological tissues often displaying distinct thermal profiles compared to adjacent healthy regions.133 This physiological characteristic offers a unique advantage for the application of thermosensitive hydrogels in targeted drug delivery and controlled therapeutic release.134 Temperature-sensitive polymers, as thermoresponsive macromolecular materials, can undergo a rapid and reversible sol–gel phase transition near their lower critical solution temperature (LCST), which is close to human body temperature, and this process can be precisely regulated by temperature.135,136 These polymers are typically composed of both hydrophilic and hydrophobic functional groups. Such polymers typically contain hydrophobic groups (e.g., methyl, ethyl, and propyl) and hydrophilic groups (e.g., hydroxyl, carboxyl, and amide).137 The interactions among these groups, particularly hydrophobic interactions and hydrogen bond formation, are highly sensitive to temperature variations.138 When the ambient temperature falls below the LCST, enhanced hydrophobic interactions and increased hydrogen bonding promote hydrogel network contraction, leading to a reduction in volume. In contrast, temperatures above the LCST weaken hydrophobic interactions, resulting in network relaxation and volume expansion.139 This thermally responsive behavior enables rapid in situ gelation at physiological temperatures, making thermosensitive hydrogels highly adaptable to the dynamic cardiac microenvironment. This characteristic enables the hydrogel to rapidly gelate at body temperature, thereby adapting to the physiological environment of myocardial tissue.

Poly(N‐isopropylacrylamide) (PNIPAAm) hydrogels, widely utilized as thermosensitive materials, serve as versatile carriers in therapeutic delivery systems.146 Li et al. fabricated single-walled carbon nanotube (SWCNT)‐modified PNIPAAm hydrogels, which not only enhanced cellular adhesion and proliferation but also demonstrated therapeutic efficacy in MI.140 In their study, brown adipose‐derived stem cells (BASCs) were encapsulated within the hydrogel and injected into the infarcted regions of rat hearts. Notably, the PNIPAAm hydrogel remained in a liquid state below 32 °C, facilitating injection and cell encapsulation, whereas it rapidly transitioned to a gel state at 37 °C, providing structural support for the embedded cells [Fig. 8(a)]. In addition, SWCNT modification provided a more favorable microenvironment for transplanted cell adhesion and survival under ROS conditions, thereby enhancing stem cell-mediated cardiac repair [Fig. 8(b)]. Similarly, Zhu et al. synthesized a thermoresponsive injectable hydrogel termed TEMPO Gel, composed of poly (N‐isopropylacrylamide‐co‐vinyl pyrrolidone‐co‐polylactic acid methacrylate‐co‐TEMPO methacrylate) (pNVMT).141 This material exhibited exceptional antioxidant properties, efficiently scavenging multiple ROS to mitigate I/R injury [Fig. 8(c)]. Concurrently, it improved post‐infarction left ventricular geometry and promoted angiogenesis. Zhao et al. designed biodegradable poly(L‐lactide)‐b‐poly(ethyleneglycol)‐b‐poly(N‐isopropylacrylamide) (PLLA‐PEG‐PNIPAAm) triblock copolymers, which self‐assembled into nanofibrous gelatin microspheres (NF‐GMS)142 [Fig. 8(d)]. These NF‐GMS exhibited excellent cell adhesion and thermoresponsiveness, undergoing rapid hydrolysis‐driven hydrophobic transitions at 37 °C to form three‐dimensional hydrogels that provided structural support and protection to cardiomyocytes. Furthermore, co‐transplantation of human embryonic stem cell‐derived cardiomyocytes (hESC‐CMs) with NF‐GMS into infarcted rat hearts significantly improved cell survival, promoted angiogenesis, reduced infarct size, and restored cardiac function.

FIG. 8.

FIG. 8.

Application of thermoresponsive hydrogels in the treatment of MI. (a) Morphological states of PNIPAAm/SWCNTs and PNIPAAm hydrogels at 31 and 37 °C. Both hydrogels exhibit temperature-responsive behavior, remaining in a sol (liquid) state at 31 °C and transforming into a gel state at 37 °C. (b) Quantitative analysis of BASC adhesion on PNIPAAm/SWCNTs and PNIPAAm hydrogels under ROS conditions. Reproduced with permission from Li et al., Biomaterials 35, 5679–5688 (2014). Copyright 2014 Elsevier.140 (c) Quantitative analysis of the hydroxyl radical scavenging ability of the hydrogels determined by the pyrogallol assay. Reproduced with permission from Zhu et al., Biomaterials 177, 98–112 (2018). Copyright 2018 Elsevier.141 (d) The PLLA–PEG–PNIPAAm triblock copolymer self-assembled into nanofibrous microspheres (NF-GMS), which subsequently formed hydrogels through thermo-induced physical cross-linking. Reproduced with permission from Zhao et al., Adv. Funct. Mater. 30, 2000776 (2020). Copyright 2020 Wiley.142 (e) Schematic illustration of the fabrication and thermoresponsive behavior of the Col@Gel system. At 25 °C, the PLGA–PEG–PLGA-based sol remains flowable, whereas at physiological temperature (37 °C), it undergoes spontaneous and reversible sol-to-gel transition, forming a semi-solid hydrogel suitable for in situ application. Reproduced with permission from Chen et al., J. Mater. Chem. B 8(5), 980–992 (2020). Copyright 2019 Royal Society of Chemistry.143 (f) Quantitative analysis of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) in the infarcted myocardium 24 h after hydrogel injection. Reproduced with permission from Xu et al., Exp. Ther. Med. 13, 588–594 (2017). Licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license/Copyright 2017 Spandidos Publications.144 (g) In vitro release profiles of TPL@F127, TPL@PLGA, and TPL@PLGA@F127 formulations. TPL@PLGA@F127 demonstrated the slowest and most controlled release behavior. (h) In vivo fluorescence imaging showing cardiac retention of DIR@PLGA and DIR@PLGA@F127 nanoparticles. The incorporation of F127 hydrogel significantly prolonged the in vivo retention of PLGA nanoparticles. Reproduced with permission from Wang et al., J. Nanobiotechnol. 21, 227 (2023). Licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license/Copyright 2023 Springer.32 (i) Schematic illustration of the in vitro thermogelation behavior of the aqueous hydrogel solution. Reproduced with permission from Zhang et al., ACS Nano 18, 10216–10229 (2024). Copyright 2024 ACS Publications.145

The triblock copolymer hydrogel composed of poly (lactic-co-glycolic acid)–polyethylene glycol–poly (lactic-co-glycolic acid) (PLGA–PEG–PLGA) has been widely investigated for drug delivery in various diseases, including cancer, diabetes, and osteomyelitis, owing to its excellent thermosensitivity, biocompatibility, and biodegradability.147,148 This hydrogel undergoes a sol–gel transition at physiological temperature and exhibits favorable injectability, gel-forming ability, and drug-loading capacity, making it particularly advantageous for sustained-release delivery systems.149,150 However, its application in the treatment of MI remains relatively underexplored. Chen et al. developed a PLGA–PEG–PLGA-based hydrogel network system (Col@Gel) encapsulating colchicine as a therapeutic agent.143 The system remains in a free-flowing sol state at 25 °C, facilitating local myocardial injection, and undergoes a sol–gel transition at 35 °C to form a stable gel at 37 °C, thereby enabling sustained and localized colchicine release [Fig. 8(e)]. Both in vitro and in vivo studies demonstrated that this hydrogel system effectively inhibited post-MI inflammation, apoptosis, and myocardial fibrosis, improved cardiac function, and enhanced survival rates in animal models while significantly reducing the systemic toxicity of colchicine. These findings highlight the promising potential of PLGA–PEG–PLGA hydrogels in the treatment of MI.

Thermosensitive chitosan hydrogels have emerged as ideal carriers for stem cell transplantation, demonstrating distinct advantages in preclinical studies.151–153 Embryonic stem cells (ESCs) hold significant promise for MI therapy due to their pluripotency and capacity to differentiate into cardiomyocytes.154 However, the clinical efficacy of ESC transplantation is constrained by poor post-transplantation survival rates and suboptimal differentiation efficiency.155 To address these limitations, Lv et al. investigated the combinatorial delivery of somatic cell nuclear transfer (SCNT)-derived and fertilization-derived ESCs via thermosensitive chitosan hydrogels into infarcted rat hearts.156 Their findings revealed that, compared with ESC transplantation alone, hydrogel-encapsulated ESCs exhibited significantly enhanced retention and increased graft size within the infarcted myocardium. Notably, SCNT-ESC delivery via hydrogels markedly improved cardiac function and significantly increased arterial and venous density in the infarct zone. Similarly, Xu et al. utilized thermosensitive chitosan hydrogels to deliver mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) to the post-infarction myocardium in rats.144 This strategy substantially improved MSC retention in the infarcted tissue [Fig. 8(f)], promoted their differentiation into cardiomyocytes, and enhanced pro-angiogenic effects, leading to significant improvements in cardiac function and hemodynamic parameters in MI rats. This approach provides a novel clinical paradigm for MSC-based MI therapy. In a more advanced design, Niu et al. developed a series of injectable, photoluminescent, thermosensitive, rapid-gelling, highly flexible, and biodegradable hydrogels.157 These materials were synthesized by copolymerizing NIPAAm, 2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate (HEMA), 1-vinyl-2-pyrrolidone (VP), and acrylic acid–oligolactide (AOLA), followed by conjugation with hypericin (HYP) to confer photoluminescent properties. The hydrogels enabled targeted stem cell delivery to infarcted cardiac and skeletal muscle tissues. Both in vitro and in vivo studies demonstrated excellent biocompatibility, stimulation of MSC proliferation and paracrine activity, and suitability as stem cell carriers. Critically, HYP-mediated photoluminescence allowed noninvasive tracking of hydrogel distribution and degradation via fluorescence imaging. This integrated approach represents a promising strategy for advancing stem cell therapies through real-time monitoring and optimized delivery.

Poloxamer 407 (Pluronic F-127), an FDA-approved triblock copolymer (PEO–PPO–PEO), exhibits thermosensitive gelation, excellent biocompatibility, and drug delivery capabilities.158 At low temperatures (25 °C), Pluronic F-127 exists as a free-flowing liquid.159 Upon exposure to physiological temperature, it undergoes a sol–gel transition, where loose micelles reorganize into a close-packed crystalline-like structure. At concentrations ≥15–20 wt. %, this forms a continuous hydrogel network, enabling precise injectable delivery to infarcted regions for controlled drug release.160 Triptolide (TPL), a bioactive compound isolated from Tripterygium wilfordii, possesses anti-inflammatory, antitumor, and immunomodulatory properties.161 Studies further demonstrate its ability to inhibit NF-κB activity and expression, significantly attenuating cardiac inflammation and fibrosis.162 However, systemic administration of TPL induces notable hepatotoxicity and nephrotoxicity, limiting its clinical utility.163 To address this, Wang et al. engineered a dual sustained-release system (TPL@PLGA@F127) comprising TPL-loaded PLGA nanoparticles embedded in Pluronic F-127 hydrogel.32 This system achieved slow, stable TPL release with enhanced myocardial retention, mitigating off-target toxicity [Figs. 8(g) and 8(h)]. Mechanistically, the system modulated macrophage polarization toward the anti-inflammatory M2 phenotype, thereby suppressing cardiomyocyte apoptosis, ameliorating the post-infarction inflammatory microenvironment, inhibiting myocardial fibrosis, improving cardiac function, and preventing adverse ventricular remodeling. Similarly, Zhang et al. developed an injectable, highly flexible, conductive composite hydrogel by encapsulating hydrophobic α-tocopherol (α-TOH) within diacrylate-functionalized Pluronic F-127 micelles and incorporating in situ-synthesized PDA with conductive components.145 This multicomponent hydrogel maintained its thermosensitive property, showing a rapid sol‐to‐gel transition when exposed to water at 37 °C [Fig. 8(i)]. Moreover, this multifunctional hydrogel effectively improved the post-infarction microenvironment, promoted myocardial repair, and enhanced therapeutic outcomes for MI.

Thermoresponsive hydrogels have emerged as optimal candidates for intramyocardial injection owing to their distinctive physicochemical properties. Current thermosensitive hydrogel therapies, though promising, remain largely in the preclinical validation stage. Existing models tend to oversimplify factors such as tissue temperature uniformity, mechanical behavior, and passive degradation. Future research will emphasize the development of integrated, hierarchically responsive platforms capable of staged and precise drug release. At the same time, efforts will focus on designing mechanically adaptive networks with dynamically tunable stiffness. Guided by artificial intelligence, treatment strategies will be tailored to the unique infarction characteristics of individual patients. Ultimately, the goal is to transform these materials from passive delivery carriers into intelligent, self-adaptive therapeutic systems that work in concert with the body's intrinsic cardiac regeneration processes.

E. Multi-stimuli-responsive hydrogels

The pathological microenvironment at the infarcted site following MI is characterized by pronounced dynamic complexity and heterogeneity. While single-stimulus responsive hydrogels can achieve targeted drug delivery under specific triggers, their therapeutic efficacy often remains limited due to the multifaceted nature of the pathological milieu. In contrast, multi-stimulus responsive hydrogels exploit diverse environmental cues within the infarcted region to achieve spatiotemporally controlled release and precise localization of therapeutic agents or cells. This strategy enhances the local bioavailability of therapeutics, amplifies treatment efficacy, and holds substantial promise for advancing MI therapy.

Among the most extensively studied systems are thermo/pH dual-responsive hydrogels, which undergo specific structural transformations in the acidic and temperature-sensitive infarcted microenvironment. These systems enable controlled, phase-specific drug release, achieving rapid therapeutic action during the early inflammatory phase and sustained release throughout later fibrotic stages. Furthermore, the incorporation of multiple stimuli-responsiveness confers greater functional stability amid physiological variability. When one trigger is weakened by patient-specific factors, alternative stimuli maintain therapeutic efficacy, ensuring continuity in cardiac repair.

For instance, Jiang et al. developed a pH/thermoresponsive injectable hydrogel [P(CS-CA-NIPAM)] for localized oncostatin M (OSM) delivery.164 The N-isopropylacrylamide (NIPAM) units enabled in situ gelation at body temperature, while acid-triggered swelling in ischemic myocardium facilitated sustained OSM release. Following injection into MI rats, this system significantly improved cardiac function, reduced infarct size, and promoted cardiomyocyte proliferation, angiogenesis, and anti-fibrotic effects. Zhang et al. developed a pH/ROS dual-responsive injectable conductive hydrogel by dual cross-linking of xanthan gum (OXP) and gelatin (GD) through reversible imine and borate ester bonds, with the incorporation of conductive composites to enhance electrical conductivity and mechanical strength.28 By encapsulating polydopamine rosmarinic acid nanoparticles (PDA-RA NPs) within the hydrogel, an on-demand release of RA was achieved through the synergistic pH and ROS responsiveness. This system enables RA to exert multifunctional therapeutic effects, including anti-inflammatory, anti-apoptotic, and anti-fibrotic activities, at different stages of MI, thereby effectively improving cardiac function and promoting myocardial repair. In another study, Zhang et al. designed a dual dynamic covalent hydrogel encapsulating mitochondria-targeted, ROS-scavenging nanoparticles (PLGA-TK-PEG-SS31) and cyclosporine A (CsA).165 Constructed from diol/hydrazide-modified hyaluronic acid (HA-Diol-HYD) and aldehyde/FPBA-modified HA (HA-FPBA-ALD) via Schiff base and boronate crosslinks, the system responded to low pH and high ROS levels in MI/R hearts. This dual sensitivity enabled controlled nanoparticle release to inhibit mitochondrial apoptotic pathways, thereby protecting cardiomyocytes. Finally, Ding et al. synthesized a dual-responsive hydrogel via thiol-ene click chemistry, coupling pH-responsive allyl-modified chitosan (OAL-CS) with thermoresponsive PNIPAM.166 Precise swelling control under pH and temperature stimuli, combined with excellent cytocompatibility, rapid gelation, and minimal inflammation, positions this system as a promising injectable platform for controlled drug delivery and minimally invasive tissue engineering applications.

Together, these studies underscore the transformative potential of multi-stimulus responsive hydrogels as next-generation therapeutic platforms for MI. Based on the aforementioned studies, the design strategies of different intelligent responsive hydrogels applied in MI treatment are systematically summarized (Table II). Additionally, quantitative therapeutic outcomes of various intelligent responsive hydrogels in MI treatment are presented (Table III). These comparative analyzes enable evidence-based evaluation of material selection, degradation profiles, mechanical compatibility, and therapeutic efficacy across different responsive platforms.

TABLE II.

Characteristics and therapeutic effects of different responsive hydrogels for MI therapy.

Type of responsive hydrogel Material or chemical bond Load composition Injection method Degradation time Mechanical properties Crucial therapeutic effects on MI References
pH-responsive hydrogel Imine bonds, MSN-NH-TMA, PEGCHO, α-CD miR-21-5p Intramyocardial injection 28 days G′ > G″ Immune modulation Angiogenesis 60
Schiff base, OHA, Col-CDH, MWCNT Metformin MSC-Exos Intramyocardial injection 21 days G′ > G″ conductivity (7.61 × 10−4 S/cm) Elastic modulus (38 kPa) (OHA/Col-CDH/MWCNT-0.2) Restoration of electrical signal conduction
Antioxidation
Angiogenesis
61
Borate ester bonds PVA, OSA, borax, tannic MXene-TA nanozymes Intramyocardial injection ———— G′ > G″
Conductivity (5.0 × 10−4 S/cm (PST0.4%)
Elastic modulus > 40 kPa (PST6%) Self-healing
Reprogrammed metabolism activated NAD+-dependent pathways 63
ROS-responsive hydrogel Diselenide bonds, HSe-CD, HA-CD, HA-Ad miR-19a/b-cholesterol Intramyocardial injection >20 days Shear-thinning behavior Promotes cardiomyocyte proliferation
Functional recovery
85
Boronate ester Chitosan NO Intramyocardial injection >21 days G′ > G″ Shear-thinning behavior Regulates ROS/NO balance 86
mPEG-P (Met-co-Ala) FTY720 Intramyocardial injection 35 days G′ 490.0 Pa (6.0 wt. % PM) Antioxidation
Anti-apoptotic
95
MMP-responsive hydrogel Collagen, GSH,
Sulfo-SMCC,
Amide bond
Recombinant protein GST-TIMP-bFGF Intramyocardial injection >8 days G′ > G″ Angiogenesis,
Improve heart function
124
HA-SH, ALG-CHO, TA,
MMP-2-cleavable peptides
DPCA Intramyocardial injection >6 days G′ > G″
Soft mechanical property (200–300 Pa)
Shear-thinning behavior
Conductivity (8.8 × 10−5 S/cm)
Stabilize HIF-1α
Improve heart function
126
Thermoresponsive hydrogel PNIPAAm, SWCNTs BASCs Intramyocardial injection ———— Conductivity Enhance cell adhesion and proliferation 140
Pluronic F127, PEDOT:PSS, PDA α-TOH Surface of the infarct area ———— G′ > G″ conductivity (1.5 S/m)
High stretchability (>140%)
Low elastic modulus (>35 kPa)
Young's modulus (80 kPa)
Modulate the post-MI infarct microenvironment
Enhances cardiac repair
Improve heart function
145
pH/thermo-Responsive hydrogel P(CS–CA–NIPAM) OSM Intramyocardial injection >30 days G′ > G″ Stimulate cell proliferation Angiogenesis
Improve heart function
164
pH/ROS-responsive hydrogel Imine bonds
Borate ester bonds
OXP, GD
PDA-RA NPs Intramyocardial injection >8 days G′ > G″ (OGPDR)
Shear-thinning behavior
Conductivity (6.27 × 10−4 S/cm)
Elastic modulus (45.35 kPa)
Improve heart function
Promotes repair
28

TABLE III.

Quantitative comparison of therapeutic outcomes among different stimuli-responsive hydrogel systems. Data are presented as percentage reduction or improvement relative to MI control groups, or as fold change (angiogenesis markers) compared to controls, as reported in the original studies. “————” indicates data not reported in the original publication. Myocardial infarct size was assessed by triphenyltetrazolium chloride (TTC) staining. Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) was evaluated by echocardiography at 4 weeks post-treatment. Angiogenesis was quantified by immunohistochemical staining of endothelial and vascular smooth muscle cell markers, including CD31+ (endothelial cells), α-SMA+ (vascular smooth muscle cells), and vWF+ (von Willebrand factor).

Hydrogel type Responsive mechanism Animal model Infarct size reduction (%) LVEF improvement (%) Angiogenesis References
Gel@MSN/miR-21-5p pH-responsive Mini pig MI About 20% About 10% Vascular volume +50 mm3 α-SMA+ density (fold) +2.0
CD31+ density (fold) +1.8
60
OHA/Col-CDH/MWCTN-Met-EXO hydrogel pH-responsive Rat MIRI About 50% About 25% α-SMA+ density (fold) +2.4
vWF+ density (fold) +2.5
CD31+ density (fold) +1.1
61
HSe-CD-HA-CD-HA-Ad-miR-19a/b hydrogel ROS-responsive Mini pig
Rat MI
About 22%
About 12%
About 28%
About 34%
CD31+/α-SMA+
vessel density↑
85
S1P/SS-31/lipo-loaded hydrogel ROS-responsive Rat MI About 42% About 24% α-SMA+ density (fold) +1.8
vWF+ density (fold) +1.5
91
GST-TIMP-bFGF/collagen-GSH hydrogel MMP-responsive Rat MI ———— About 20% α-SMA+ density (fold) +1.1
vWF+ density (fold) +2.2
CD31+ density (fold) +2.0
124
FPDA hydrogel Thermoresponsive Rabbit MI ———— About 12% α-SMA+ density (fold) +4.0
CD31+ density (fold) +2.1
145
OGDPR hydrogel pH/ROS-responsive Rat MI About 32% About 40% α-SMA+ density (fold) +2.5
vWF+ density (fold) +2.5
28
FGPP@AST hydrogel pH/thermo-responsive Rat MI About 12% About 30% α-SMA+ density (fold) +6.8
vWF+ density (fold) +5.7
62

However, current studies still show clear limitations. Most designs focus on simple dual-stimuli systems, neglecting other key pathological cues such as elevated MMP levels and hypoxia. Many platforms also lack hierarchical responsiveness, failing to align stimulus activation with the dynamic stages of MI from inflammation to proliferation and remodeling. Evidence to date does not identify a single optimal responsive mechanism for MI therapy, as variations in models, protocols, and evaluation timelines make comparisons difficult. Future work should emphasize standardized head-to-head studies with unified criteria and stage-matched interventions to clarify which mechanisms or combinations yield the best outcomes. Researchers should also aim to establish integrated multi or quadruple responsive frameworks sensitive to pH, ROS, MMPs, and hypoxia, supported by computational modeling to predict synergistic effects and guide rational design. Incorporating feedback regulation will allow therapeutics to dynamically modulate subsequent responses. Before clinical translation, careful assessment is needed to determine whether added system complexity delivers tangible therapeutic benefits in large animal models.

F. Stage-specific MI microenvironmental characteristics and matched responsive strategies

The pathophysiological evolution of MI follows a temporal sequence comprising three overlapping yet distinct stages: the inflammatory phase, the proliferative phase, and the remodeling phase.167 Each stage is characterized by specific microenvironmental alterations, which provide unique opportunities for the intervention of stimulus-responsive hydrogels (Table IV).

TABLE IV.

Temporal framework of MI pathophysiology and optimal responsive hydrogel strategies.

MI phase Timeline Dominant microenvironmental characteristics Optimal responsive mechanisms Representative systems Key therapeutic outcomes
Inflammatory phase 0–7 days Explosive ROS generation
Inflammatory cell infiltration
Severe tissue acidosis
pH-responsive
ROS-responsive
Thermoresponsive
Gel@VHH96
Col@Gel-colchicine143
Attenuate myocardial injury
Anti-inflammation
Anti-oxidation
Proliferative phase 7–28 days Macrophage polarization
Fibroblast proliferation
Peak MMP-2/9 expression
Sustained oxidative stress
Active angiogenesis
MMP-responsive
ROS/MMP-responsive
pH/MMP-responsive
MPGC4125
HSD/DFO@GMs38
Regulate macrophage polarization
Promote angiogenesis
Suppress oxidative stress
Remodeling phase 28 days-months Scar tissue maturation
Collagen cross-linking
Chronic oxidative stress
Electrical decoupling
Multi-stimuli responsive OGDPR28
S1&FT/Lipo-QCFT91
Anti-fibrosis
Suppress oxidative stress
Inhibit myocardial remodeling
Improves heart function

During the early pathophysiological progression of MI, the inflammatory phase emerges and is characterized by severe ischemia-induced cardiomyocyte death, which subsequently triggers extensive inflammatory cell infiltration and oxidative burst.168,169 The microenvironment becomes profoundly acidotic owing to anaerobic metabolism, excessive ROS generation, and localized hyperthermia.170 During this critical window, ROS-responsive, pH-responsive, and thermoresponsive hydrogels loaded with antioxidants or anti-inflammatory agents can provide rapid therapeutic intervention, effectively mitigating oxidative damage and suppressing excessive inflammatory responses. In the proliferative phase, macrophages undergo phenotypic transition from M1 to M2, while fibroblasts proliferate and differentiate into myofibroblasts to facilitate tissue repair.171,172 This phase is marked by active angiogenesis, tissue consolidation, and granulation tissue formation with organized collagen deposition.173 The microenvironment is defined by elevated MMP-2/9 expression, persistent oxidative stress, and gradual pH normalization. At this stage, MMP-responsive hydrogels and dual-responsive systems (ROS/MMP or pH/MMP) are particularly suitable for targeted intervention, enabling controlled release of pro-angiogenic factors and immunomodulatory agents to support constructive tissue remodeling while suppressing excessive inflammatory responses. The remodeling phase is characterized by scar maturation, in which type I collagen replaces type III collagen, resulting in significantly increased tissue stiffness, reduced cellular density accompanied by fibroblast apoptosis, stabilization and partial regression of the vascular network, chronic redistribution of mechanical stress, and potential progression toward adverse ventricular remodeling that may lead to heart failure.174 Multi-stimuli-responsive hydrogels offer sustained and controlled release profiles to address the complex and evolving microenvironment, preventing adverse ventricular remodeling and supporting long-term functional recovery. These systems can simultaneously respond to residual ROS, subtle pH fluctuations, and sustained matrix metalloproteinase activity, thereby delivering anti-fibrotic agents, improving electrical conduction, and promoting favorable ventricular remodeling throughout extended therapeutic windows.

The responsive release kinetics of hydrogels should be highly consistent with the pathological progression of MI. pH-responsive hydrogels can sense the acidic microenvironment, with degradation rates dependent on the type of chemical bonds. For instance, imine bonds typically exhibit a degradation half-life (t1/2) of 1–3 h at pH < 5, and within a certain range, the reaction rate positively correlates with the pH value, thereby enabling rapid drug release. In ROS-responsive hydrogels, diselenide demonstrates rapid oxidation characteristics with degradation occurring within minutes to hours, while thioether bonds undergo relatively slower cleavage reactions, with reaction rates positively correlating with local ROS concentrations. In contrast, the degradation rate of MMP-responsive hydrogels primarily depends on local MMP-2/9 expression levels, typically requiring 3–7 days for significant degradation and drug release in MI treatment. Temperature-responsive hydrogels, relying on physical phase transitions, can achieve nearly instantaneous responses, representing the fastest response among all stimuli-responsive types, albeit with limited specificity. Therefore, during the acute phase of myocardial infarction, where the infarct microenvironment is characterized by severe oxidative stress and low pH conditions, ROS- and pH-responsive hydrogels demonstrate greater advantages due to their degradation kinetics. Conversely, during the proliferative repair phase, MMP-responsive hydrogels are more suitable. Only by precisely matching the degradation kinetics of various responsive hydrogels with different pathological stages of MI can optimal therapeutic outcomes be achieved.

III. ADVANTAGES AND CHALLENGES OF INTELLIGENT RESPONSIVE HYDROGELS

With the rapid advancement of materials science and biotechnology, intelligent responsive hydrogels have demonstrated remarkable potential in the treatment of MI. These materials can dynamically respond to pathological microenvironments, enabling on-demand release of therapeutic agents. Their precise modulation capabilities open new avenues for MI therapy. Despite encouraging research progress, the development of intelligent responsive hydrogels still faces significant challenges. Future efforts should focus on continuous innovation to develop diversified, intelligent responsive materials and to integrate them with emerging therapeutic strategies, with the ultimate goal of providing more effective and precise treatment options for patients with MI.

A. Advantages of intelligent responsive hydrogels

1. Spatiotemporally controlled drug release

By incorporating environmentally sensitive moieties or polymers into hydrogel structures, engineered intelligent responsive hydrogels exhibit specific responsiveness to the pathological microenvironment of MI, surpassing the capabilities of conventional hydrogels. This feature enables spatiotemporally controlled, dose-dependent release of drugs or therapeutic factors at the lesion site, effectively increasing local drug concentrations while significantly reducing systemic side effects. Furthermore, hydrogels can be designed to target distinct pathological phases of MI, including the inflammatory, proliferative, and maturation phases, thereby delivering stage-specific therapeutic effects to enhance treatment efficacy. For instance, Hu et al. constructed a MI-responsive hydrogel by forming boronate ester linkages between the 3-aminophenylboronic acid (BA) groups of CMC-BA and the dihydroxyl groups of polyvinyl alcohol (PVA).175 The hydrogel was further loaded with curcumin-encapsulated PLGA nanoparticles (PLGA@Cur NPs) and recombinant human collagen type III (rhCol III). This multifunctional hydrogel degraded under acidic and high ROS conditions, enabling on-demand release of Cur and rhCol III. In vitro results showed that at pH 5.0 and 0.2 mM H2O2, the cumulative release of Cur and rhCol III reached around 80% and 60% by day 8, respectively, due to the hydrogel's dual responsiveness. During the acute inflammatory phase of MI, rapid Cur release suppressed early oxidative damage and inflammation, while sustained rhCol III release supported later cell proliferation and angiogenesis.

2. Excellent biocompatibility and inherent safety

The clinical translation potential of intelligent responsive hydrogels for MI therapy is critically dependent on their biocompatibility, a property that governs the safety of dynamic interactions between materials and biological systems at the molecular, cellular, and systemic levels.176,177 Biocompatible materials are defined by their ability to interact with biological entities, including cells, tissues, and immune systems, without eliciting toxicity, inflammation, or immune rejection in specific applications.178 Intelligent responsive hydrogels are typically fabricated from biocompatible materials such as natural polysaccharide-derived hydrogels. These hydrogels exhibit molecular structures that closely resemble those of the ECM, demonstrating high affinity and low immunogenicity, thereby ensuring their safe and effective application in MI treatment.179,180 For example, Jiang et al. designed a responsive injectable hydrogel [P(CS-CA-NIPAM)].164 CCK-8 and live/dead staining showed H9C2 cell viability above 90%, indicating negligible cytotoxicity of the polymer. Calcein-AM/PI staining further confirmed the excellent biocompatibility of the material, as almost no cell death was observed in H9C2 cells.

Intelligent responsive hydrogels generally exhibit favorable biodegradability, enabling safe in vivo degradation and effectively mitigating long-term retention risks.181,182 Their degradation process is temporally synchronized with the myocardial repair cycle. Prior to clinical application, intelligent responsive hydrogels must undergo rigorous biocompatibility and safety assessments. Evaluation methodologies include cytotoxicity assays, such as the MTT assay or lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) release assay, to assess toxicity to cardiomyocytes or fibroblasts, and Hematoxylin-Eosin (H&E) staining to evaluate potential damage to visceral cells, including hepatic, splenic, pulmonary, and renal tissues.183 These stringent evaluations ensure the safety and efficacy of intelligent responsive hydrogels for clinical use.

3. Multifunctional integration and synergistic therapy

Multifunctional integration and synergistic therapy have emerged as the core development direction for intelligent responsive hydrogels, aiming to achieve efficient and precise drug delivery while promoting tissue repair and regeneration through multiple functional modules. Specifically, therapeutic agents or nanoparticles can be encapsulated within hydrogels, with drug release triggered by environmental stimuli to enable targeted therapy.184,185 Furthermore, bioactive factors such as growth factors and cytokines can also be incorporated to enhance cell proliferation and migration, thereby accelerating tissue repair.186,187 Concurrently, hydrogels with biocompatibility and biodegradability can serve as scaffolds for cell delivery, providing robust support for tissue regeneration and repair.188 Innovatively, research is exploring the integration of biosensors into hydrogels to enable real-time monitoring of physiological parameters, offering critical insights for disease diagnosis and treatment. This direction undoubtedly opens new frontiers for future research.

B. Challenges of intelligent responsive hydrogels

1. Complexity in material design and fabrication

Intelligent responsive hydrogels face significant clinical translation hurdles due to complex chemical synthesis and modification, leading to difficult fabrication and high costs. From a material design perspective, key performance indicators must be satisfied: excellent biocompatibility to prevent immune rejection, mechanical properties matching cardiac tissue to provide optimal support, and molecular features responsive to specific stimuli for environmental adaptability.189,190

To achieve multifunctionality in intelligent hydrogels, multicomponent systems typically require the integration of polymers, bioactive substances, and nanoparticles. However, the nonuniform distribution of these components within the hydrogel matrix can lead to inconsistent material properties, thereby compromising therapeutic efficacy. Furthermore, microstructural parameters such as pore size and porosity significantly influence cell migration, nutrient transport, and tissue regeneration.191 Consequently, precise control over the microstructure necessitates optimization of fabrication methodologies. Notably, large-scale production encounters critical technical hurdles in ensuring batch-to-batch consistency and stability.192,193 This challenge underscores the need to establish stringent quality control systems with real-time monitoring throughout all manufacturing stages. Additionally, appropriate storage conditions, including cryopreservation, controlled humidity, and protection from light, are essential for preserving the integrity of the three-dimensional hydrogel network and preventing structural denaturation.194

In addition, understanding structure–activity relationships (SARs) is fundamental to rational hydrogel design. Building on the representative intelligent responsive hydrogels discussed in the previous sections, several key structure–activity relationships can be identified. First, chemical bond stability plays a crucial role, as lower bond dissociation energy not only provides higher sensitivity to external stimuli but also increases the risk of premature degradation.195,196 Second, cross-linking density should be optimized so that the elastic modulus matches the stiffness of cardiac tissue, balancing mechanical support with cellular infiltration.197 Third, maintaining a proper balance between hydrophilic and hydrophobic components is essential for responsiveness and structural stability.198 Fourth, conductive filler loading must be carefully controlled to achieve adequate conductivity while preserving biocompatibility.199 Looking ahead, future studies should aim to develop quantitative structure–activity relationship models that link structural parameters with therapeutic outcomes, enabling predictive material design.

2. Limitations in sensitivity and controllability of intelligent responsive systems

The responsive behavior of intelligent hydrogels typically relies on bond cleavage or material responses triggered by specific chemical signals, exhibiting distinct threshold characteristics.200 Significant hydrogel responses occur only when the stimulus intensity exceeds a critical threshold; otherwise, incomplete bond cleavage may compromise therapeutic efficacy.201 For pH-responsive hydrogels, the typical activation condition occurs at pH values below 7. However, variations in patients' infarct size, metabolic status, or local blood supply may cause pH fluctuations beyond the trigger range, leading to premature degradation or delayed drug release, thereby impairing therapeutic outcomes. Moreover, physiological states and microenvironmental heterogeneity among individuals further modulate hydrogel responsiveness. Enzyme-responsive hydrogels depend on specific enzyme expression levels; however, patient age, genetic background, or medication use may alter enzymatic activity, thereby affecting drug release profiles. Finally, most intelligent hydrogels display single-phase release behavior, limiting their ability to dynamically adapt to disease progression. For instance, thermoresponsive hydrogels release drugs at physiological temperatures, but sustained fever in patients can exhaust the material's phase-transition capacity, resulting in reduced therapeutic efficacy.

The optimization of sensitivity and responsive performance in intelligent responsive hydrogels fundamentally represents the challenge of achieving compatibility between the material design and complex pathophysiological microenvironments, posing new difficulties for researchers. Future studies should focus on further refining hydrogel materials, constructing multimodal cooperative response systems, mimicking the hierarchical structures of biological tissues, and optimizing response mechanisms. An emerging research frontier involves leveraging artificial intelligence to predict individual patient parameters, such as enzymatic activity and pH fluctuations, in order to tailor hydrogel activation thresholds for personalized therapeutic applications.

3. Clinical translation barriers

Despite significant research breakthroughs in the hydrogel field, intelligent responsive hydrogels continue to encounter substantial bottlenecks in clinical translation (Fig. 9).

FIG. 9.

FIG. 9.

Clinical translation pathways and bottlenecks of intelligent responsive hydrogels.

One major obstacle to clinical translation is that hydrogels showing promising results in vitro often fail to reproduce the same therapeutic outcomes in vivo. This inconsistency stems from several fundamental limitations. The pathological process of MI is inherently complex, involving multiple cell types, dynamic microenvironmental changes, and systemic regulation, whereas simplified in vitro models cannot fully mimic these conditions.202 Moreover, static culture systems fail to replicate the cyclic mechanical stress generated by the beating heart, leading to mechanical fatigue, shear-induced drug leakage, and delamination at the implant-tissue interface. In addition, pharmacokinetic factors such as systemic clearance, vascular washout, and protein binding reduce local drug availability.203 Finally, immune activation, foreign body reactions, and chronic inflammation in vivo can all diminish therapeutic efficacy, despite favorable biocompatibility results in preliminary tests.204,205 To bridge this translational gap, future studies should prioritize the development of dynamic in vitro models that mimic temporal fluctuations in pH, ROS, and MMP levels as well as mechanical loading. Advanced imaging modalities such as Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) and Positron Emission Tomography (PET) are needed to track hydrogel distribution, degradation, and drug release in real time. Furthermore, the identification of relevant biomarkers will be essential to recognize early predictors of in vivo failure during in vitro screening.

In addition, in order to achieve true clinical translation, patient stratification is essential, requiring comprehensive consideration of the pathological stage, clinical characteristics, and hydrogel properties to enable precise and personalized therapy. It is essential to evaluate strategies that maximize therapeutic efficacy while minimizing potential risks, aligning hydrogel functionalities with the individualized pathological needs of patients. According to the pathophysiological progression of myocardial infarction, appropriate responsive hydrogels were matched to each disease stage (Table IV) to meet stage-specific therapeutic requirements and achieve precise drug release. However, it is worth noting that during the acute phase of myocardial infarction, when hemodynamic instability may occur, intramyocardial injection should be used with caution. In such cases, catheter-based delivery may represent a safer and more feasible alternative. Additionally, patient stratification based on the infarct size and location is also crucial. For anterior wall myocardial infarction, priority may be given to mechanically supportive intelligent responsive hydrogels, which can provide maximal structural reinforcement to prevent cardiac rupture and limit ventricular remodeling. In contrast, for inferior wall myocardial infarction, intelligent responsive hydrogels designed to modulate fluid balance and electrical conduction may be more appropriate. Finally, a comprehensive assessment of the patient's overall clinical profile is paramount. Age, comorbidities, and revascularization status must inform hydrogel selection. For younger patients, intelligent responsive hydrogels with enhanced bioactivity that promote long-term repair and tissue regeneration may be preferable. In contrast, for elderly patients or those with multiple comorbidities, mechanically supportive hydrogels with high safety and low immunogenicity are more suitable. Moreover, in patients with diabetes or impaired renal function, hydrogel components that rely on renal metabolism should be avoided to minimize potential systemic risks. Future research should focus on developing an evidence-based stratification framework and validating it through prospective clinical studies, ultimately achieving truly individualized therapy for MI.

Several fundamental barriers also continue to impede clinical translation. First, long-term safety assessment of intelligent responsive hydrogels remains significantly inadequate. Although these hydrogels exhibit favorable in vivo biocompatibility, the long-term immunogenicity and toxicity of their degradation products or loaded nanomaterials remain poorly characterized. Current studies are largely restricted to short-term observations, leaving long-term effects insufficiently evaluated. Therefore, establishing a standardized safety evaluation framework will require systematic animal model studies and multicenter clinical trials. Second, the clinical research infrastructure remains underdeveloped. As an emerging class of biomaterials, intelligent responsive hydrogels are still primarily investigated in preclinical animal studies, with extremely limited clinical research. Consequently, their therapeutic efficacy cannot be directly extrapolated to human outcomes. Clinical patients, often elderly individuals with comorbidities such as diabetes or hypertension, present more complex physiological microenvironments, placing greater demands on smart responsive hydrogels. Furthermore, the absence of unified clinical trial design protocols and efficacy evaluation criteria hinders cross-study data comparison and integration, severely impeding clinical translation. Thus, developing standardized clinical research frameworks has become pivotal for advancing this field. Finally, in the context of MI therapy, although endocardial injection has emerged as a major research focus due to its precision, this technique requires considerable operator expertise and carries the risk of severe complications, including myocardial perforation and arrhythmias. A critical technical challenge persists: ensuring injection precision while mitigating procedural risks through the development of safer and more effective delivery technologies.

IV. CONCLUSION

Intelligent microenvironment-responsive hydrogels offer precise and adaptive therapeutic strategies for MI by responding to pathological cues such as pH, ROS, temperature, and enzyme activity. These hydrogels enable controlled drug release, modulate inflammation, and promote tissue regeneration, showing great promise in targeted MI therapy. However, complex fabrication, high production costs, and limited clinical data hinder their translation. Future research should emphasize material optimization, biosafety evaluation, and artificial intelligence-guided design to achieve personalized and precise treatment. With continued interdisciplinary innovation, intelligent responsive hydrogels are poised to transform cardiac repair and advance regenerative cardiovascular medicine.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

This study was supported by the Basic Research Program of Shanxi Province (202403021221247), the Shanxi Traditional Chinese Medicine Administration research topic (2024ZYYC032), and the Scientific research start-up fund project for talent introduction of Shanxi Bethune Hospital (2023RC23).

Figure 1 support was provided by Figdraw.

Contributor Information

Kaiyi Zhu, Email: mailto:zhukaiyi@sxbqeh.com.cn.

Yuping Gao, Email: mailto:gaoyuping@sxbqeh.com.cn.

AUTHOR DECLARATIONS

Conflict of Interest

The authors have no conflicts to disclose.

Ethics Approval

Ethics approval was not required.

Author Contributions

Jian Li: Conceptualization (equal); Investigation (equal); Writing – original draft (equal). Jinglin Gao: Formal analysis (equal); Methodology (equal); Visualization (equal). Kaiyi Zhu: Funding acquisition (equal); Methodology (equal); Resources (equal); Writing – review & editing (equal). Yuping Gao: Funding acquisition (equal); Supervision (equal); Writing – review & editing (equal).

DATA AVAILABILITY

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding authors upon reasonable request.

References

  • 1.Reed G. W., Rossi J. E., and Cannon C. P., “Acute myocardial infarction,” Lancet 389(10065), 197–210 (2017). 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)30677-8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Lan W., He B., and Hu S., “Admission heart rate and in-hospital mortality in acute myocardial infarction: A contemporary analysis of the MIMIC-III cohort,” BMC Cardiovasc. Disord. 25(1), 484 (2025). 10.1186/s12872-025-04957-5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Zhu L., Liu Y., Wang K., and Wang N., “Regulated cell death in acute myocardial infarction: Molecular mechanisms and therapeutic implications,” Ageing Res. Rev. 104, 102629 (2025). 10.1016/j.arr.2024.102629 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Saito Y., Oyama K., Tsujita K., Yasuda S., and Kobayashi Y., “Treatment strategies of acute myocardial infarction: Updates on revascularization, pharmacological therapy, and beyond,” J. Cardiol. 81(2), 168–178 (2023). 10.1016/j.jjcc.2022.07.003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Chapman A. R., Taggart C., Boeddinghaus J., Mills N. L., and Fox K. A. A., “Type 2 myocardial infarction: Challenges in diagnosis and treatment,” Eur. Heart J. 46(6), 504–517 (2025). 10.1093/eurheartj/ehae803 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Gil-Cabrerizo P., Scacchetti I., Garbayo E., and Blanco-Prieto M. J., “Cardiac tissue engineering for myocardial infarction treatment,” Eur. J. Pharm. Sci. 185, 106439 (2023). 10.1016/j.ejps.2023.106439 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Xu Q., Xiao Z., Yang Q. et al. , “Hydrogel-based cardiac repair and regeneration function in the treatment of myocardial infarction,” Mater. Today Bio 25, 100978 (2024). 10.1016/j.mtbio.2024.100978 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Rao S. V., O'Donoghue M. L., Ruel M. et al. , “2025 ACC/AHA/ACEP/NAEMSP/SCAI guideline for the management of patients with acute coronary syndromes: A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines,” Circulation 151(13), e771–e862 (2025). 10.1161/cir.0000000000001309 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Iravani S. and Varma R. S., “Advanced drug delivery micro- and nanosystems for cardiovascular diseases,” Molecules 27(18), 5843 (2022). 10.3390/molecules27185843 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Zhang J., Guo Y., Bai Y., and Wei Y., “Application of biomedical materials in the diagnosis and treatment of myocardial infarction,” J. Nanobiotechnol. 21(1), 298 (2023). 10.1186/s12951-023-02063-2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Liu T., Hao Y., Zhang Z. et al. , “Advanced cardiac patches for the treatment of myocardial infarction,” Circulation 149(25), 2002–2020 (2024). 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.123.067097 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Xue F., Zhao S., Tian H. et al. , “Two way workable microchanneled hydrogel suture to diagnose, treat and monitor the infarcted heart,” Nat. Commun. 15(1), 864 (2024). 10.1038/s41467-024-45144-y [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Wu T., Cui C., Huang Y. et al. , “Coadministration of an adhesive conductive hydrogel patch and an injectable hydrogel to treat myocardial infarction,” ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 12(2), 2039–2048 (2020). 10.1021/acsami.9b17907 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.He Z., Chen Q., Duan X. et al. , “Reactive oxygen species-responsive nano-platform with dual-targeting and fluorescent lipid-specific imaging capabilities for the management of atherosclerotic plaques,” Acta Biomater. 181, 375–390 (2024). 10.1016/j.actbio.2024.05.011 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Yuan J., Yang H., Liu C. et al. , “Microneedle patch loaded with exosomes containing microRNA-29b prevents cardiac fibrosis after myocardial infarction,” Adv. Healthcare Mater. 12(13), e2202959 (2023). 10.1002/adhm.202202959 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Ding C., Qin C., Sun Y. et al. , “Bioceramics-enhanced patch activates epicardial epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition via Notch pathway for cardiac repair,” Sci. Adv. 11(23), eads5978 (2025). 10.1126/sciadv.ads5978 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Wu C., Zhang Y., Xu Y. et al. , “Injectable polyaniline nanorods/alginate hydrogel with AAV9-mediated VEGF overexpression for myocardial infarction treatment,” Biomaterials 296, 122088 (2023). 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2023.122088 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Hu W., Yang C., Guo X. et al. , “Research advances of injectable functional hydrogel materials in the treatment of myocardial infarction,” Gels 8(7), 423 (2022). 10.3390/gels8070423 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Song Y., Zhang C., Zhang J. et al. , “An injectable silk sericin hydrogel promotes cardiac functional recovery after ischemic myocardial infarction,” Acta Biomater. 41, 210–223 (2016). 10.1016/j.actbio.2016.05.039 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Lee M., Park J., Choe G. et al. , “A conductive and adhesive hydrogel composed of MXene nanoflakes as a paintable cardiac patch for infarcted heart repair,” ACS Nano 17(13), 12290–12304 (2023). 10.1021/acsnano.3c00933 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Matsumura Y., Zhu Y., Jiang H. et al. , “Intramyocardial injection of a fully synthetic hydrogel attenuates left ventricular remodeling post myocardial infarction,” Biomaterials 217, 119289 (2019). 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2019.119289 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Shilo M., Oved H., Wertheim L. et al. , “Injectable nanocomposite implants reduce ROS accumulation and improve heart function after infarction,” Adv. Sci. 8(24), e2102919 (2021). 10.1002/advs.202102919 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Melvinsdottir I. H., Midgett D., Lee S. R. et al. , “Intramyocardial hydrogel delivery decreases left ventricular remodeling and increases angiogenesis post myocardial infarction,” Circulation 18(10), e018357 (2025). 10.1161/circimaging.125.018357 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Zhang J., Sun D., Guo Y. et al. , “Targeted delivery of black phosphorus nanosheets by ROS responsive complex hydrogel based on angiogenesis and antioxidant promotes myocardial infarction repair,” J. Nanobiotechnol. 22(1), 433 (2024). 10.1186/s12951-024-02685-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Regato-Herbella M., Morhenn I., Mantione D. et al. , “ROS-responsive 4D printable acrylic thioether-based hydrogels for smart drug release,” Chem. Mater. 36(3), 1262–1272 (2024). 10.1021/acs.chemmater.3c02264 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Zong S., Wen H., Lv H. et al. , “Intelligent hydrogel with both redox and thermo-response based on cellulose nanofiber for controlled drug delivery,” Carbohydr. Polym. 278, 118943 (2022). 10.1016/j.carbpol.2021.118943 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Mura S., Nicolas J., and Couvreur P., “Stimuli-responsive nanocarriers for drug delivery,” Nat. Mater. 12(11), 991–1003 (2013). 10.1038/nmat3776 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Zhang L., Bei Z., Li T., and Qian Z., “An injectable conductive hydrogel with dual responsive release of rosmarinic acid improves cardiac function and promotes repair after myocardial infarction,” Bioact. Mater. 29, 132–150 (2023). 10.1016/j.bioactmat.2023.07.007 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Yu C., Qiu Y., Yao F., Wang C., and Li J., “Chemically programmed hydrogels for spatiotemporal modulation of the cardiac pathological microenvironment,” Adv. Mater. 36(32), e2404264 (2024). 10.1002/adma.202404264 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Qiu Y., Yu C., Yue Z. et al. , “Chronological-programmed black phosphorus hydrogel for responsive modulation of the pathological microenvironment in myocardial infarction,” ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 16(14), 17323–17338 (2024). 10.1021/acsami.4c01956 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Yang J., Wang J., Zeng Z., Chen Z., Wang D., and Wu Y., “Injectable sustained-release danshensu sodium-loaded nanoparticle hydrogel targets macrophages to improve myocardial microenvironment for myocardial infarction treatment,” Bioact. Mater. 54, 159–178 (2025). 10.1016/j.bioactmat.2025.08.014 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Wang K., Zhu K., Zhu Z. et al. , “Triptolide with hepatotoxicity and nephrotoxicity used in local delivery treatment of myocardial infarction by thermosensitive hydrogel,” J. Nanobiotechnol. 21(1), 227 (2023). 10.1186/s12951-023-01980-6 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.He Y. Y., Wen Y., Zheng X. X., and Jiang X. J., “Intramyocardial delivery of HMGB1 by a novel thermosensitive hydrogel attenuates cardiac remodeling and improves cardiac function after myocardial infarction,” J. Cardiovasc. Pharmacol. 61(4), 283–290 (2013). 10.1097/FJC.0b013e31827ecd50 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Kong Y., Wang L., Duan F. et al. , “Injectable and pH-activated self-feedback hydrogel encapsulating stem cells for augmented acute myocardial infarction therapy,” Adv. Healthcare Mater. 15(5), e03324 (2026). 10.1002/adhm.202503324 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Bastings M. M., Koudstaal S., Kieltyka R. E. et al. , “A fast pH-switchable and self-healing supramolecular hydrogel carrier for guided, local catheter injection in the infarcted myocardium,” Adv. Healthcare Mater. 3(1), 70–78 (2014). 10.1002/adhm.201300076 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Qian C., Zhang T., Gravesande J., Baysah C., Song X., and Xing J., “Injectable and self-healing polysaccharide-based hydrogel for pH-responsive drug release,” Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 123, 140–148 (2019). 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2018.11.048 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Kim K. S., Lee D., Song C. G., and Kang P. M., “Reactive oxygen species-activated nanomaterials as theranostic agents,” Nanomedicine 10(17), 2709–2723 (2015). 10.2217/nnm.15.108 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Gong J., Qiu Y., Yu C. et al. , “Injectable hydrogel for cardiac repair via dual inhibition of ferroptosis and oxidative stress,” ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 17(19), 27906–27922 (2025). 10.1021/acsami.5c02666 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Zhen P., Jiang Q., Yu F. et al. , “ROS-differentiated release of Apelin-13 from hydrogel comprehensively treats myocardial ischemia-reperfusion injury,” J. Controlled Release 379, 609–620 (2025). 10.1016/j.jconrel.2025.01.039 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Wang L. L., Chung J. J., Li E. C., Uman S., Atluri P., and Burdick J. A., “Injectable and protease-degradable hydrogel for siRNA sequestration and triggered delivery to the heart,” J. Controlled Release 285, 152–161 (2018). 10.1016/j.jconrel.2018.07.004 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Jha A. K., Tharp K. M., Browne S. et al. , “Matrix metalloproteinase-13 mediated degradation of hyaluronic acid-based matrices orchestrates stem cell engraftment through vascular integration,” Biomaterials 89, 136–147 (2016). 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2016.02.023 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Chen X., Wu Y., Song P. et al. , “Matrix metalloproteinase-responsive controlled release of self-assembly nanoparticles accelerates heart valve regeneration in situ by orchestrating immunomodulation,” Adv. Sci. 12(2), e2403351 (2025). 10.1002/advs.202403351 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Ma R., Lu D., Yang Z. et al. , “Emerging therapy strategies for energy metabolism in acute myocardial infarction,” J. Transl. Med. 23(1), 1140 (2025). 10.1186/s12967-025-07088-9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Contessotto P. and Pandit A., “Therapies to prevent post-infarction remodelling: From repair to regeneration,” Biomaterials 275, 120906 (2021). 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2021.120906 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Yu H., Gu L., Ma H., and Yu L., “Identification and analysis of diagnostic markers related to lactate metabolism in myocardial infarction,” Pathol. Res. Pract. 271, 156010 (2025). 10.1016/j.prp.2025.156010 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Vander Heiden M. G., Cantley L. C., and Thompson C. B., “Understanding the Warburg effect: The metabolic requirements of cell proliferation,” Science 324(5930), 1029–1033 (2009). 10.1126/science.1160809 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Halestrap A. P., Kerr P. M., Javadov S., and Woodfield K. Y., “Elucidating the molecular mechanism of the permeability transition pore and its role in reperfusion injury of the heart,” Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1366(1–2), 79–94 (1998). 10.1016/S0005-2728(98)00122-4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Bopassa J. C., “Protection of the ischemic myocardium during the reperfusion: Between hope and reality,” Am. J. Cardiovasc. Dis. 2(3), 223–236 (2012). [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Buerke M., Rupprecht H. J., vom Dahl J. et al. , “Sodium-hydrogen exchange inhibition: Novel strategy to prevent myocardial injury following ischemia and reperfusion,” Am. J. Cardiol. 83(10), 19–22 (1999). 10.1016/S0002-9149(99)00316-1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Murphy E. and Steenbergen C., “Mechanisms underlying acute protection from cardiac ischemia-reperfusion injury,” Physiol. Rev. 88(2), 581–609 (2008). 10.1152/physrev.00024.2007 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Wang F., Gómez-Sintes R., and Boya P., “Lysosomal membrane permeabilization and cell death,” Traffic 19(12), 918–931 (2018). 10.1111/tra.12613 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Han S., Lee J., Jung E. et al. , “Mechanochemical drug conjugation via pH-responsive imine linkage for polyether prodrug micelles,” ACS Appl. Bio Mater. 4(3), 2465–2474 (2021). 10.1021/acsabm.0c01437 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Han G. S. and Domaille D. W., “Connecting the dynamics and reactivity of arylboronic acids to emergent and stimuli-responsive material properties,” J. Mater. Chem. B 10(33), 6263–6278 (2022). 10.1039/D2TB00968D [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Rinaldi A., Caraffi R., Grazioli M. V. et al. , “Applications of the ROS-responsive thioketal linker for the production of smart nanomedicines,” Polymers 14(4), 687 (2022). 10.3390/polym14040687 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Hu Y. and Liu P., “Design of pH/redox co-triggered degradable diselenide-containing polyprodrug via a facile one-pot two-step approach for tumor-specific chemotherapy,” Molecules 29(16), 3837 (2024). 10.3390/molecules29163837 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Terriac L., Helesbeux J. J., Maugars Y., Guicheux J., Tibbitt M. W., and Delplace V., “Boronate ester hydrogels for biomedical applications: Challenges and opportunities,” Chem. Mater. 36(14), 6674–6695 (2024). 10.1021/acs.chemmater.4c00507 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Liu L., Wang W., Huang L. et al. , “Injectable pathological microenvironment-responsive anti-inflammatory hydrogels for ameliorating intervertebral disc degeneration,” Biomaterials 306, 122509 (2024). 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2024.122509 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Bhat M. A., Rather R. A., and Shalla A. H., “Texture and rheological features of strain and pH sensitive chitosan-imine graphene-oxide composite hydrogel with fast self-healing nature,” Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 222(Pt B), 3129–3141 (2022). 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2022.10.086 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Yang A., Yang P., Shen N. et al. , “Bond-centric modifications of hyaluronic acid: Synthesis, processing, and biomedical applications,” Int. J. Nanomed. 20, 15063–15108 (2025). 10.2147/IJN.S560798 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Li Y., Chen X., Jin R. et al. , “Injectable hydrogel with MSNs/microRNA-21-5p delivery enables both immunomodification and enhanced angiogenesis for myocardial infarction therapy in pigs,” Sci. Adv. 7(9), eabd6740 (2021). 10.1126/sciadv.abd6740 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Cheng N., Luo Q., Yang Y. et al. , “Injectable pH responsive conductive hydrogel for intelligent delivery of metformin and exosomes to enhance cardiac repair after myocardial ischemia-reperfusion injury,” Adv. Sci. 12(24), e2410590 (2025). 10.1002/advs.202410590 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Li X., Zhang X., Qi Y. et al. , “Conductive bioadhesive hydrogel with controlled astragaloside IV release for ferroptosis-mediated cardiac repair,” J. Controlled Release 384, 113874 (2025). 10.1016/j.jconrel.2025.113874 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Chen Y., Liang Y., Shen J. et al. , “A NADH oxidase nanozyme restores redox homeostasis to ameliorate multi-organ aging and ischemic cardiomyopathy,” Research 8, 0973 (2025). 10.34133/research.0973 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Luo Q., Cheng N., Yang Y. et al. , “Multi-stage cooperative ROS-responsive hydrogel platform for drug delivery in myocardial ischemia-reperfusion injury repair,” Mater. Today Bio 32, 101854 (2025). 10.1016/j.mtbio.2025.101854 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Cheng M., Cui Y., Guo Y. et al. , “Design of carboxymethyl chitosan-reinforced pH-responsive hydrogels for on-demand release of carvacrol and simulation of release kinetics,” Food Chem. 405(Pt A), 134856 (2023). 10.1016/j.foodchem.2022.134856 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Naeem S., Barkat K., Shabbir M. et al. , “Fabrication of pH responsive hydrogel blends of chondroitin sulfate/pluronic F-127 for the controlled release of ketorolac: Its characterization and acute oral toxicity study,” Drug Dev. Ind. Pharm. 48(11), 611–622 (2022). 10.1080/03639045.2022.2150773 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Noureen S., Noreen S., Ghumman S. A. et al. , “A novel pH-responsive hydrogel system based on Prunus armeniaca gum and acrylic acid: Preparation and evaluation as a potential candidate for controlled drug delivery,” Eur. J. Pharm. Sci. 189, 106555 (2023). 10.1016/j.ejps.2023.106555 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Zhou Y. and Jin L., “Hydrolysis-induced large swelling of polyacrylamide hydrogels,” Soft Matter 16(24), 5740–5749 (2020). 10.1039/D0SM00663G [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Hwang U., Moon H., Park J., and Jung H. W., “Crosslinking and swelling properties of pH-responsive poly(ethylene glycol)/poly(acrylic acid) interpenetrating polymer network hydrogels,” Polymers 16(15), 2149 (2024). 10.3390/polym16152149 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Guaragnone T., Rossi M., Chelazzi D. et al. , “pH-responsive semi-interpenetrated polymer networks of pHEMA/PAA for the capture of copper ions and corrosion removal,” ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 14(5), 7471–7485 (2022). 10.1021/acsami.1c22837 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Garbern J. C., Minami E., Stayton P. S., and Murry C. E., “Delivery of basic fibroblast growth factor with a pH-responsive, injectable hydrogel to improve angiogenesis in infarcted myocardium,” Biomaterials 32(9), 2407–2416 (2011). 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2010.11.075 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Shahid N., Erum A., Zaman M. et al. , “pH-responsive nanocomposite based hydrogels for the controlled delivery of ticagrelor; in vitro and in vivo approaches,” Int. J. Nanomed. 16, 6345–6366 (2021). 10.2147/IJN.S330186 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Hori M. and Nishida K., “Oxidative stress and left ventricular remodelling after myocardial infarction,” Cardiovasc. Res. 81(3), 457–464 (2009). 10.1093/cvr/cvn335 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Brieger K., Schiavone S., F. J. Miller, Jr., and Krause K. H., “Reactive oxygen species: From health to disease,” Swiss Med. Wkly. 142, w13659 (2012). 10.4414/smw.2012.13659 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Webster K. A., “Mitochondrial membrane permeabilization and cell death during myocardial infarction: Roles of calcium and reactive oxygen species,” Future Cardiol. 8(6), 863–884 (2012). 10.2217/fca.12.58 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.He F. and Zuo L., “Redox roles of reactive oxygen species in cardiovascular diseases,” Int. J. Mol. Sci. 16(11), 27770–27780 (2015). 10.3390/ijms161126059 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Sarniak A., Lipińska J., Tytman K., and Lipińska S., “Endogenous mechanisms of reactive oxygen species (ROS) generation,” Postepy Hig. Med. Dosw. 70(0), 1150–1165 (2016). 10.5604/17322693.1224259 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Cadenas S., “Mitochondrial uncoupling, ROS generation and cardioprotection,” Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1859(9), 940–950 (2018). 10.1016/j.bbabio.2018.05.019 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Nambu H., Takada S., Maekawa S. et al. , “Inhibition of xanthine oxidase in the acute phase of myocardial infarction prevents skeletal muscle abnormalities and exercise intolerance,” Cardiovasc. Res. 117(3), 805–819 (2021). 10.1093/cvr/cvaa127 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Ling S. and Xu J. W., “Phenotypes and functions of ‘aged’ neutrophils in cardiovascular diseases,” Biomed. Pharmacother. 179, 117324 (2024). 10.1016/j.biopha.2024.117324 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Zhou F., He Y., Zhang M. et al. , “Polydopamine (PDA)-coated diselenide-bridged mesoporous silica-based nanoplatform for neuroprotection by reducing oxidative stress and targeting neuroinflammation in intracerebral hemorrhage,” J. Nanobiotechnol. 22(1), 731 (2024). 10.1186/s12951-024-03023-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Yuan X., Jia Z., Li J. et al. , “A diselenide bond-containing ROS-responsive ruthenium nanoplatform delivers nerve growth factor for Alzheimer's disease management by repairing and promoting neuron regeneration,” J. Mater. Chem. B 9(37), 7835–7847 (2021). 10.1039/D1TB01290H [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Shen J., Jiao W., Yuan B. et al. , “Oral curcumin-thioketal-inulin conjugate micelles against radiation-induced enteritis,” Antioxidants 13(4), 417 (2024). 10.3390/antiox13040417 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Xiong Z., Huang G., Huang J. R., Liu Y., He L., and Chen T., “Organic-inorganic covalent selenium reversing ischemic reperfusion injury,” Nat. Commun. 16(1), 8030 (2025). 10.1038/s41467-025-62986-2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Wang K., Wen J., Liang T. et al. , “Enhancing miR-19a/b induced cardiomyocyte proliferation in infarcted hearts by alleviating oxidant stress and controlling miR-19 release,” Biomaterials 312, 122732 (2025). 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2024.122732 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Hao T., Qian M., Zhang Y. et al. , “An injectable dual-function hydrogel protects against myocardial ischemia/reperfusion injury by modulating ROS/NO disequilibrium,” Adv. Sci. 9(15), e2105408 (2022). 10.1002/advs.202105408 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Shen H., Bao X., Qi B. et al. , “Reactive oxygen species-responsive hydrogel loaded with melatonin as a minimally invasive treatment for myocardial I/R injury,” iScience 28(7), 112834 (2025). 10.1016/j.isci.2025.112834 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Martin J. R., Patil P., Yu F., Gupta M. K., and Duvall C. L., “Enhanced stem cell retention and antioxidative protection with injectable, ROS-degradable PEG hydrogels,” Biomaterials 263, 120377 (2020). 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2020.120377 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89.Wang Y., Li S., Li W. et al. , “Cardiac-targeted and ROS-responsive liposomes containing puerarin for attenuating myocardial ischemia-reperfusion injury,” Nanomedicine 19(28), 2335–2355 (2024). 10.1080/17435889.2024.2402678 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90.Yao Y., Ding J., Wang Z. et al. , “ROS-responsive polyurethane fibrous patches loaded with methylprednisolone (MP) for restoring structures and functions of infarcted myocardium in vivo,” Biomaterials 232, 119726 (2020). 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2019.119726 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91.Zheng Z., Lei C., Liu H. et al. , “A ROS-responsive liposomal composite hydrogel integrating improved mitochondrial function and pro-angiogenesis for efficient treatment of myocardial infarction,” Adv. Healthcare Mater. 11(19), e2200990 (2022). 10.1002/adhm.202200990 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92.Criado-Gonzalez M. and Mecerreyes D., “Thioether-based ROS responsive polymers for biomedical applications,” J. Mater. Chem. B 10(37), 7206–7221 (2022). 10.1039/D2TB00615D [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 93.Liang J. and Liu B., “ROS-responsive drug delivery systems,” Bioeng. Transl. Med. 1(3), 239–251 (2016). 10.1002/btm2.10014 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 94.Wang S., Liu Q., Li L., and Urban M. W., “Recent advances in stimuli-responsive commodity polymers,” Macromol. Rapid Commun. 42(18), e2100054 (2021). 10.1002/marc.202100054 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 95.Luo Q., Li Z., Sun W. et al. , “Myocardia-injected synergistically anti-apoptotic and anti-inflammatory poly(amino acid) hydrogel relieves ischemia-reperfusion injury,” Adv. Mater. 37(11), e2420171 (2025). 10.1002/adma.202420171 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 96.Wang L., Yu C., You T. et al. , “Injection of ROS-responsive hydrogel loaded with IL-1β-targeted nanobody for ameliorating myocardial infarction,” Bioact. Mater. 46, 273–284 (2025). 10.1016/j.bioactmat.2024.12.013 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 97.Wang H., Gong X., Guo X. et al. , “Characterization, release, and antioxidant activity of curcumin-loaded sodium alginate/ZnO hydrogel beads,” Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 121, 1118–1125 (2019). 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2018.10.121 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 98.Guo Y., Qu Y., Yu J. et al. , “A chitosan-vitamin C based injectable hydrogel improves cell survival under oxidative stress,” Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 202, 102–111 (2022). 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2022.01.030 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 99.Ren X., Chen D., Wang Y. et al. , “Nanozymes-recent development and biomedical applications,” J. Nanobiotechnol. 20(1), 92 (2022). 10.1186/s12951-022-01295-y [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 100.Li D., Dai D., Xiong G., Lan S., and Zhang C., “Metal-based nanozymes with multienzyme-like activities as therapeutic candidates: Applications, mechanisms, and optimization strategy,” Small 19(7), e2205870 (2023). 10.1002/smll.202205870 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 101.Wei Y. J., Chen H., Zhou Z. W. et al. , “Kill two birds with one stone: Dual-metal MOF-nanozyme-decorated hydrogels with ROS-scavenging, oxygen-generating, and antibacterial abilities for accelerating infected diabetic wound healing,” Small 20(48), e2403679 (2024). 10.1002/smll.202403679 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 102.Baranwal A., Polash S. A., Aralappanavar V. K., Behera B. K., Bansal V., and Shukla R., “Recent progress and prospect of metal-organic framework-based nanozymes in biomedical application,” Nanomaterials 14(3), 244 (2024). 10.3390/nano14030244 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 103.Zhu Z., Wang X., Wang N. et al. , “Raspberry-shaped ZIF-8/Au nanozymes with excellent peroxidase-like activity for simple and visual detection of glutathione,” Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 416(19), 4417–4426 (2024). 10.1007/s00216-024-05378-7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 104.Zhong Y., Yang Y., Xu Y. et al. , “Design of a Zn-based nanozyme injectable multifunctional hydrogel with ROS scavenging activity for myocardial infarction therapy,” Acta Biomater. 177, 62–76 (2024). 10.1016/j.actbio.2024.01.015 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 105.Xu H., Zhao Z., She P. et al. , “Salvaging myocardial infarction with nanoenzyme-loaded hydrogels: Targeted scavenging of mitochondrial reactive oxygen species,” J. Controlled Release 375, 788–801 (2024). 10.1016/j.jconrel.2024.09.038 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 106.Liu T., Sun L., Zhang Y., Wang Y., and Zheng J., “Imbalanced GSH/ROS and sequential cell death,” J. Biochem. Mol. Toxicol. 36(1), e22942 (2022). 10.1002/jbt.22942 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 107.Vandermeulen G. W. and Klok H. A., “Peptide/protein hybrid materials: Enhanced control of structure and improved performance through conjugation of biological and synthetic polymers,” Macromol. Biosci. 4(4), 383–398 (2004). 10.1002/mabi.200300079 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 108.Dringen R., Koehler Y., Derr L. et al. , “Adsorption and reduction of glutathione disulfide on α-Al2O3 nanoparticles: Experiments and modeling,” Langmuir 27(15), 9449–9457 (2011). 10.1021/la201856p [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 109.Li J., Shu Y., Hao T. et al. , “A chitosan-glutathione based injectable hydrogel for suppression of oxidative stress damage in cardiomyocytes,” Biomaterials 34(36), 9071–9081 (2013). 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2013.08.031 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 110.Cui N., Hu M., and Khalil R. A., “Biochemical and biological attributes of matrix metalloproteinases,” Prog. Mol. Biol. Transl. Sci. 147, 1–73 (2017). 10.1016/bs.pmbts.2017.02.005 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 111.Jabłońska-Trypuć A., Matejczyk M., and Rosochacki S., “Matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs), the main extracellular matrix (ECM) enzymes in collagen degradation, as a target for anticancer drugs,” J. Enzyme Inhib. Med. Chem. 31(sup1), 177–183 (2016). 10.3109/14756366.2016.1161620 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 112.Zitka O., Kukacka J., Krizkova S. et al. , “Matrix metalloproteinases,” Curr. Med. Chem. 17(31), 3751–3768 (2010). 10.2174/092986710793213724 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 113.He L., Kang Q., Chan K. I., Zhang Y., Zhong Z., and Tan W., “The immunomodulatory role of matrix metalloproteinases in colitis-associated cancer,” Front. Immunol. 13, 1093990 (2023). 10.3389/fimmu.2022.1093990 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 114.DeLeon-Pennell K. Y., Meschiari C. A., Jung M., and Lindsey M. L., “Matrix metalloproteinases in myocardial infarction and heart failure,” Prog. Mol. Biol. Transl. Sci. 147, 75–100 (2017). 10.1016/bs.pmbts.2017.02.001 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 115.Phatharajaree W., Phrommintikul A., and Chattipakorn N., “Matrix metalloproteinases and myocardial infarction,” Can. J. Cardiol. 23(9), 727–733 (2007). 10.1016/s0828-282x(07)70818-8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 116.Nagase H., Visse R., and Murphy G., “Structure and function of matrix metalloproteinases and TIMPs,” Cardiovasc. Res. 69(3), 562–573 (2006). 10.1016/j.cardiores.2005.12.002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 117.Matta C., Fellows C. R., Quasnichka H. et al. , “Clusterin secretion is attenuated by the proinflammatory cytokines interleukin-1β and tumor necrosis factor-α in models of cartilage degradation,” J. Orthop. Res. 39(5), 1017–1029 (2021). 10.1002/jor.24814 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 118.Stone A. V., Loeser R. F., Vanderman K. S., Long D. L., Clark S. C., and Ferguson C. M., “Pro-inflammatory stimulation of meniscus cells increases production of matrix metalloproteinases and additional catabolic factors involved in osteoarthritis pathogenesis,” Osteoarthritis Cartilage 22(2), 264–274 (2014). 10.1016/j.joca.2013.11.002 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 119.Janicki J. S., Brower G. L., Gardner J. D., Chancey A. L., and J. A. Stewart, Jr., “The dynamic interaction between matrix metalloproteinase activity and adverse myocardial remodeling,” Heart Fail. Rev. 9(1), 33–42 (2004). 10.1023/B:HREV.0000011392.03037.7e [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 120.Weng C. H., Chung F. P., Chen Y. C. et al. , “Pleiotropic effects of myocardial MMP-9 inhibition to prevent ventricular arrhythmia,” Sci. Rep. 6, 38894 (2016). 10.1038/srep38894 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 121.Cabral-Pacheco G. A., Garza-Veloz I., Castruita-De la Rosa C. et al. , “The roles of matrix metalloproteinases and their inhibitors in human diseases,” Int. J. Mol. Sci. 21(24), 9739 (2020). 10.3390/ijms21249739 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 122.Kazemi A., Fathy M., Jahanian A. et al. , “The role of MMPs and TIMPs in regenerative medicine: From pathological ECM remodeling to therapeutic applications,” Biomed. Pharmacother. 191, 118457 (2025). 10.1016/j.biopha.2025.118457 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 123.Purcell B. P., Barlow S. C., Perreault P. E. et al. , “Delivery of a matrix metalloproteinase-responsive hydrogel releasing TIMP-3 after myocardial infarction: Effects on left ventricular remodeling,” Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol. 315(4), H814–H825 (2018). 10.1152/ajpheart.00076.2018 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 124.Fan C., Shi J., Zhuang Y. et al. , “Myocardial-infarction-responsive smart hydrogels targeting matrix metalloproteinase for on-demand growth factor delivery,” Adv. Mater. 31(40), e1902900 (2019). 10.1002/adma.201902900 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 125.Chen W., Wang C., Liu W. et al. , “A matrix-metalloproteinase-responsive hydrogel system for modulating the immune microenvironment in myocardial infarction,” Adv. Mater. 35(13), e2209041 (2023). 10.1002/adma.202209041 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 126.Wei X., Chen S., Xie T. et al. , “An MMP-degradable and conductive hydrogel to stabilize HIF-1α for recovering cardiac functions,” Theranostics 12(1), 127–142 (2022). 10.7150/thno.63481 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 127.Zhang F., Lee K. B., and Linhardt R. J., “SPR biosensor probing the interactions between TIMP-3 and heparin/GAGs,” Biosensors 5(3), 500–512 (2015). 10.3390/bios5030500 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 128.Purcell B. P., Lobb D., Charati M. B. et al. , “Injectable and bioresponsive hydrogels for on-demand matrix metalloproteinase inhibition,” Nat. Mater. 13(6), 653–661 (2014). 10.1038/nmat3922 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 129.Kraehenbuehl T. P., Ferreira L. S., Hayward A. M. et al. , “Human embryonic stem cell-derived microvascular grafts for cardiac tissue preservation after myocardial infarction,” Biomaterials 32(4), 1102–1109 (2011). 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2010.10.005 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 130.Cao S., Loh K., Pei Y., Zhang W., and Han J., “Overcoming barriers to the clinical utilization of iPSCs: Reprogramming efficiency, safety and quality,” Protein Cell 3(11), 834–845 (2012). 10.1007/s13238-012-2078-6 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 131.Kadota S., Tanaka Y., and Shiba Y., “Heart regeneration using pluripotent stem cells,” J. Cardiol. 76(5), 459–463 (2020). 10.1016/j.jjcc.2020.03.013 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 132.Li H., Yu B., Yang P. et al. , “Injectable AuNP-HA matrix with localized stiffness enhances the formation of gap junction in engrafted human induced pluripotent stem cell-derived cardiomyocytes and promotes cardiac repair,” Biomaterials 279, 121231 (2021). 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2021.121231 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 133.Guan S., Li J., Zhang K., and Li J., “Environmentally responsive hydrogels for repair of cardiovascular tissue,” Heart Fail. Rev. 26(5), 1273–1285 (2021). 10.1007/s10741-020-09934-y [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 134.Cheng N. C., Lin W. J., Ling T. Y., and Young T. H., “Sustained release of adipose-derived stem cells by thermosensitive chitosan/gelatin hydrogel for therapeutic angiogenesis,” Acta Biomater. 51, 258–267 (2017). 10.1016/j.actbio.2017.01.060 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 135.Fitzpatrick S. D., Fitzpatrick L. E., Thakur A., Mazumder M. A., and Sheardown H., “Temperature-sensitive polymers for drug delivery,” Expert Rev. Med. Devices 9(4), 339–351 (2012). 10.1586/erd.12.24 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 136.Abdulsalam L., Abubakar S., Permatasari I. et al. , “Advanced biocompatible and biodegradable polymers: A review of functionalization, smart systems, and sustainable applications,” Polymers 17(21), 2901 (2025). 10.3390/polym17212901 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 137.Stetsyshyn Y., Ohar H., Budkowski A., and Lazzara G., “Molecular design and role of the dynamic hydrogen bonds and hydrophobic interactions in temperature-switchable polymers: From understanding to applications,” Polymers 17(11), 1580 (2025). 10.3390/polym17111580 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 138.Wu J., Lu Q., Wang H., Lu B., and Huang B., “Controllable construction of temperature-sensitive supramolecular hydrogel based on cellulose and cyclodextrin,” Polymers 14(18), 3801 (2022). 10.3390/polym14183801 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 139.Kasiński A., Zielińska-Pisklak M., Oledzka E., and Sobczak M., “Smart hydrogels—Synthetic stimuli-responsive antitumor drug release systems,” Int. J. Nanomed. 15, 4541–4572 (2020). 10.2147/IJN.S248987 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 140.Li X., Zhou J., Liu Z. et al. , “A PNIPAAm-based thermosensitive hydrogel containing SWCNTs for stem cell transplantation in myocardial repair,” Biomaterials 35(22), 5679–5688 (2014). 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2014.03.067 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 141.Zhu Y., Matsumura Y., Velayutham M., Foley L. M., Hitchens T. K., and Wagner W. R., “Reactive oxygen species scavenging with a biodegradable, thermally responsive hydrogel compatible with soft tissue injection,” Biomaterials 177, 98–112 (2018). 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2018.05.044 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 142.Zhao C., Tian S., Liu Q. et al. , “Biodegradable nanofibrous temperature-responsive gelling microspheres for heart regeneration,” Adv. Funct. Mater. 30(21), 2000776 (2020). 10.1002/adfm.202000776 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 143.Chen Y., Shi J., Zhang Y. et al. , “An injectable thermosensitive hydrogel loaded with an ancient natural drug colchicine for myocardial repair after infarction,” J. Mater. Chem. B 8(5), 980–992 (2020). 10.1039/C9TB02523E [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 144.Xu B., Li Y., Deng B., Liu X., Wang L., and Zhu Q. L., “Chitosan hydrogel improves mesenchymal stem cell transplant survival and cardiac function following myocardial infarction in rats,” Exp. Ther. Med. 13(2), 588–594 (2017). 10.3892/etm.2017.4026 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 145.Zhang F., Zhang Y., Qian S. et al. , “Injectable and conductive nanomicelle hydrogel with α-tocopherol encapsulation for enhanced myocardial infarction repair,” ACS Nano 18(14), 10216–10229 (2024). 10.1021/acsnano.4c00509 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 146.Nagase K., “Thermoresponsive interfaces obtained using poly(N-isopropylacrylamide)-based copolymer for bioseparation and tissue engineering applications,” Adv. Colloid Interface Sci. 295, 102487 (2021). 10.1016/j.cis.2021.102487 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 147.Chen J., Liu Y., Cheng G. et al. , “Tailored hydrogel delivering niobium carbide boosts ROS-scavenging and antimicrobial activities for diabetic wound healing,” Small 18(27), e2201300 (2022). 10.1002/smll.202201300 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 148.Yuan B., Zhang Y., Wang Q. et al. , “Thermosensitive vancomycin@PLGA-PEG-PLGA/HA hydrogel as an all-in-one treatment for osteomyelitis,” Int. J. Pharm. 627, 122225 (2022). 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2022.122225 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 149.López-Cano J. J., Sigen A., Andrés-Guerrero V. et al. , “Thermo-responsive PLGA-PEG-PLGA hydrogels as novel injectable platforms for neuroprotective combined therapies in the treatment of retinal degenerative diseases,” Pharmaceutics 13(2), 234 (2021). 10.3390/pharmaceutics13020234 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 150.Khodaverdi E., Kheirandish F., Mirzazadeh Tekie F. S., Khashyarmanesh B. Z., Hadizadeh F., and Moallemzadeh Haghighi H., “Preparation of a sustained release drug delivery system for dexamethasone by a thermosensitive, in situ forming hydrogel for use in differentiation of dental pulp,” Int. Scholarly Res. Not. 2013, 983053. 10.1155/2013/983053 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 151.Yang J., Liu Y., Deng G. et al. , “Thermosensitive and injectable chitosan-based hydrogel embedding umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cells for β-cell repairing in type 2 diabetes mellitus,” Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 279(Pt 4), 135546 (2024). 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2024.135546 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 152.He S., Lin B., Zhang C. et al. , “Injectable chitosan-based thermosensitive hydrogel loaded with adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cells promotes pressure ulcer healing,” Colloids Surf., B 256(Pt 2), 115089 (2025). 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2025.115089 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 153.Luo Y. and Gao Y., “Potential role of hydrogels in stem cell culture and hepatocyte differentiation,” Nano Biomed. Eng. 16(2), 188–202 (2024). 10.26599/NBE.2024.9290055 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 154.Goushki M. A., Kharat Z., Kehtari M. et al. , “Applications of extraembryonic tissue-derived cells in vascular tissue regeneration,” Stem Cell Res. Ther. 15(1), 205 (2024). 10.1186/s13287-024-03784-3 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 155.Takagi Y., Nishimura M., Morizane A. et al. , “Survival and differentiation of neural progenitor cells derived from embryonic stem cells and transplanted into ischemic brain,” J. Neurosurg. 103(2), 304–310 (2005). 10.3171/jns.2005.103.2.0304 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 156.Lü S., Wang H., Lu W. et al. , “Both the transplantation of somatic cell nuclear transfer- and fertilization-derived mouse embryonic stem cells with temperature-responsive chitosan hydrogel improve myocardial performance in infarcted rat hearts,” Tissue Eng., Part A 16(4), 1303–1315 (2010). 10.1089/ten.tea.2009.0434 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 157.Niu H., Li X., Li H., Fan Z., Ma J., and Guan J., “Thermosensitive, fast gelling, photoluminescent, highly flexible, and degradable hydrogels for stem cell delivery,” Acta Biomater. 83, 96–108 (2019). 10.1016/j.actbio.2018.10.038 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 158.Shriky B., Kelly A., Isreb M. et al. , “Pluronic F127 thermosensitive injectable smart hydrogels for controlled drug delivery system development,” J. Colloid Interface Sci. 565, 119–130 (2020). 10.1016/j.jcis.2019.12.096 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 159.Bodratti A. M. and Alexandridis P., “Formulation of poloxamers for drug delivery,” J. Funct. Biomater. 9(1), 11 (2018). 10.3390/jfb9010011 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 160.Al Khateb K., Ozhmukhametova E. K., Mussin M. N. et al. , “In situ gelling systems based on Pluronic F127/Pluronic F68 formulations for ocular drug delivery,” Int. J. Pharm. 502(1–2), 70–79 (2016). 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2016.02.027 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 161.Hou W., Liu B., and Xu H., “Triptolide: Medicinal chemistry, chemical biology and clinical progress,” Eur. J. Med. Chem. 176, 378–392 (2019). 10.1016/j.ejmech.2019.05.032 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 162.Shen J., Ma H., and Wang C., “Triptolide improves myocardial fibrosis in rats through inhibition of nuclear factor kappa B and NLR family pyrin domain containing 3 inflammasome pathway,” Korean J. Physiol. Pharmacol. 25(6), 533–543 (2021). 10.4196/kjpp.2021.25.6.533 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 163.Xu H. and Liu B., “Triptolide-targeted delivery methods,” Eur. J. Med. Chem. 164, 342–351 (2019). 10.1016/j.ejmech.2018.12.058 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 164.Jiang Y. L., Niu S., Lin Z. et al. , “Injectable hydrogel with dual-sensitive behavior for targeted delivery of oncostatin M to improve cardiac restoration after myocardial infarction,” J. Mater. Chem. B 10(34), 6514–6531 (2022). 10.1039/D2TB00623E [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 165.Zhang X., Sun Y., Yang R. et al. , “An injectable mitochondria-targeted nanodrug loaded-hydrogel for restoring mitochondrial function and hierarchically attenuating oxidative stress to reduce myocardial ischemia-reperfusion injury,” Biomaterials 287, 121656 (2022). 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2022.121656 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 166.Ding H., Li B., Liu Z. et al. , “Decoupled pH- and thermo-responsive injectable chitosan/PNIPAM hydrogel via thiol-ene click chemistry for potential applications in tissue engineering,” Adv. Healthcare Mater. 9(14), e2000454 (2020). 10.1002/adhm.202000454 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 167.Borrelli M. A., Turnquist H. R., and Little S. R., “Biologics and their delivery systems: Trends in myocardial infarction,” Adv. Drug Delivery Rev. 173, 181–215 (2021). 10.1016/j.addr.2021.03.014 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 168.Moris D., Spartalis M., Tzatzaki E. et al. , “The role of reactive oxygen species in myocardial redox signaling and regulation,” Ann. Transl. Med. 5(16), 324 (2017). 10.21037/atm.2017.06.17 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 169.Liu J., Liu F., Liang T. et al. , “The roles of Th cells in myocardial infarction,” Cell Death Discovery 10(1), 287 (2024). 10.1038/s41420-024-02064-6 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 170.Liu Y., Wang S., Zhang J. et al. , “Reprogramming the myocardial infarction microenvironment with melanin-based composite nanomedicines in mice,” Nat. Commun. 15(1), 6651 (2024). 10.1038/s41467-024-50854-4 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 171.Xu A., Xu S., Tan X. et al. , “Dynamic regulation of macrophage polarization in acute myocardial infarction and its therapeutic potential,” J. Inflammation Res. 18, 17363–17385 (2025). 10.2147/JIR.S543139 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 172.van den Borne S. W., Diez J., Blankesteijn W. M., Verjans J., Hofstra L., and Narula J., “Myocardial remodeling after infarction: The role of myofibroblasts,” Nat. Rev. Cardiol. 7(1), 30–37 (2010). 10.1038/nrcardio.2009.199 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 173.Xiong Z., An Q., Chen L., Xiang Y., Li L., and Zheng Y., “Cell or cell derivative-laden hydrogels for myocardial infarction therapy: From the perspective of cell types,” J. Mater. Chem. B 11(41), 9867–9888 (2023). 10.1039/D3TB01411H [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 174.Venugopal H., Hanna A., Humeres C., and Frangogiannis N. G., “Properties and functions of fibroblasts and myofibroblasts in myocardial infarction,” Cells 11(9), 1386 (2022). 10.3390/cells11091386 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 175.Hu C., Liu W., Long L. et al. , “Regeneration of infarcted hearts by myocardial infarction-responsive injectable hydrogels with combined anti-apoptosis, anti-inflammatory and pro-angiogenesis properties,” Biomaterials 290, 121849 (2022). 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2022.121849 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 176.Zhang Q., Wei X., Ji Y. et al. , “Adjustable and ultrafast light-cured hyaluronic acid hydrogel: Promoting biocompatibility and cell growth,” J. Mater. Chem. B 8(25), 5441–5450 (2020). 10.1039/C9TB02796C [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 177.Kim M. H. and Park W. H., “Chemically cross-linked silk fibroin hydrogel with enhanced elastic properties, biodegradability, and biocompatibility,” Int. J. Nanomed. 11, 2967–2978 (2016). 10.2147/ijn.S106467 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 178.Klinkmann H., Wolf H., and Schmitt E., “Definition of biocompatibility,” Contrib. Nephrol. 37, 70–77 (1984). 10.1159/000408553 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 179.Highley C. B., Prestwich G. D., and Burdick J. A., “Recent advances in hyaluronic acid hydrogels for biomedical applications,” Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 40, 35–40 (2016). 10.1016/j.copbio.2016.02.008 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 180.Landa N., Miller L., Feinberg M. S. et al. , “Effect of injectable alginate implant on cardiac remodeling and function after recent and old infarcts in rat,” Circulation 117(11), 1388–1396 (2008). 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.727420 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 181.Ho T. C., Chang C. C., Chan H. P. et al. , “Hydrogels: Properties and applications in biomedicine,” Molecules 27(9), 2902 (2022). 10.3390/molecules27092902 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 182.Van Tomme S. R. and Hennink W. E., “Biodegradable dextran hydrogels for protein delivery applications,” Expert Rev. Med. Devices. 4(2), 147–164 (2007). 10.1586/17434440.4.2.147 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 183.Wang D., Hu Y., Zhang L., Cai H., Wang Y., and Zhang Y., “Dual delivery of an NF-κB inhibitor and IL-10 through supramolecular hydrogels polarizes macrophages and promotes cardiac repair after myocardial infarction,” Acta Biomater. 164, 111–123 (2023). 10.1016/j.actbio.2023.03.035 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 184.Haley K. E., Almas T., Shoar S. et al. , “The role of anti-inflammatory drugs and nanoparticle-based drug delivery models in the management of ischemia-induced heart failure,” Biomed. Pharmacother. 142, 112014 (2021). 10.1016/j.biopha.2021.112014 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 185.Zhu S., Zhang W., Xu C., Huang J., and Zou C., “An injectable polyacrylamide/chitosan-based hydrogel with highly adhesive, stretchable and electroconductive properties loaded with irbesartan for treatment of myocardial ischemia-reperfusion injury,” Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 266(Pt 1), 131175 (2024). 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2024.131175 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 186.Montazeri L., Sobat M., Kowsari-Esfahan R. et al. , “Vascular endothelial growth factor sustained delivery augmented cell therapy outcomes of cardiac progenitor cells for myocardial infarction,” J. Tissue Eng. Regener. Med. 14(12), 1939–1944 (2020). 10.1002/term.3125 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 187.Lv Z., Hu T., Bian Y. et al. , “A MgFe-LDH nanosheet-incorporated smart thermo-responsive hydrogel with controllable growth factor releasing capability for bone regeneration,” Adv. Mater. 35(5), e2206545 (2023). 10.1002/adma.202206545 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 188.Yang Q., Peng J., Xiao H., Xu X., and Qian Z., “Polysaccharide hydrogels: Functionalization, construction and served as scaffold for tissue engineering,” Carbohydr. Polym. 278, 118952 (2022). 10.1016/j.carbpol.2021.118952 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 189.Maji S. and Lee H., “Engineering hydrogels for the development of three-dimensional in vitro models,” Int. J. Mol. Sci. 23(5), 2662 (2022). 10.3390/ijms23052662 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 190.Razzaq A., Ashraf M. U., Barkat K. et al. , “Development and characterization of pH-responsive Delonix regia/mucin co-poly (acrylate) hydrogel for controlled drug delivery of metformin HCl,” Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 274(Pt 1), 132767 (2024). 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2024.132767 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 191.Li Y., Liu S., Zhang J. et al. , “Elastic porous microspheres/extracellular matrix hydrogel injectable composites releasing dual bio-factors enable tissue regeneration,” Nat. Commun. 15(1), 1377 (2024). 10.1038/s41467-024-45764-4 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 192.Tohfafarosh M., Baykal D., Kiel J. W., Mansmann K., and Kurtz S. M., “Effects of gamma and e-beam sterilization on the chemical, mechanical and tribological properties of a novel hydrogel,” J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater. 53, 250–256 (2016). 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2015.08.024 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 193.Sutradhar S. C., Shin H., Kim W., and Jang H., “Hydrogel films in biomedical applications: Fabrication, properties and therapeutic potential,” Gels 11(11), 918 (2025). 10.3390/gels11110918 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 194.Luong P. T., Browning M. B., Bixler R. S., and Cosgriff-Hernandez E., “Drying and storage effects on poly(ethylene glycol) hydrogel mechanical properties and bioactivity,” J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 102(9), 3066–3076 (2014). 10.1002/jbm.a.34977 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 195.Xie R., Yan X., Yu J. et al. , “pH-responsive bioadhesive with robust and stable wet adhesion for gastric ulcer healing,” Biomaterials 309, 122599 (2024). 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2024.122599 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 196.Dong L., Chen H., Liu T., Zhu J., Yu M., and Yuan Q., “Poly(l-cysteine) peptide amphiphile derivatives containing disulfide bonds: Synthesis, self-assembly-induced β-sheet nanostructures, pH/reduction dual response, and drug release,” Biomacromolecules 22(12), 5374–5381 (2021). 10.1021/acs.biomac.1c01324 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 197.Guan H., Liu J., Liu D. et al. , “Elastic and conductive melanin/poly(vinyl alcohol) composite hydrogel for enhancing repair effect on myocardial infarction,” Macromol. Biosci. 22(12), e2200223 (2022). 10.1002/mabi.202200223 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 198.Liao F., Tian Z., Yang X. et al. , “Hydrophobic association: A facile approach to prepare physical cross-linked gelatin hydrogel with desirable thermal stability, flexibility and self-healing ability,” Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 262(Pt 1), 130058 (2024). 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2024.130058 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 199.Zhang L., Li T., Yu Y. et al. , “An injectable conductive hydrogel restores electrical transmission at myocardial infarct site to preserve cardiac function and enhance repair,” Bioact. Mater. 20, 339–354 (2023). 10.1016/j.bioactmat.2022.06.001 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 200.Gong T., Jiang J., Chen C. et al. , “Temperature-responsive two-dimensional polydopamine hydrogel: Preparation, mechanisms, and applications in cancer treatment,” Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 282(Pt 2), 136891 (2024). 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2024.136891 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 201.Ma Y., Tang Y., Fan J. et al. , “A pH-responsive dual-network biopolysaccharide hydrogel with enhanced self-healing and controlled drug release properties,” RSC Adv. 14(52), 38353–38363 (2024). 10.1039/D4RA05775A [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 202.Song M., Choi D. B., Im J. S. et al. , “Modeling acute myocardial infarction and cardiac fibrosis using human induced pluripotent stem cell-derived multi-cellular heart organoids,” Cell Death Dis. 15(5), 308 (2024). 10.1038/s41419-024-06703-9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 203.Robertson I., Wai Hau T., Sami F. et al. , “The science of resveratrol, formulation, pharmacokinetic barriers and its chemotherapeutic potential,” Int. J. Pharm. 618, 121605 (2022). 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2022.121605 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 204.Zhang D., Chen Q., Zhang W. et al. , “Silk-inspired β-peptide materials resist fouling and the foreign-body response,” Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 59(24), 9586–9593 (2020). 10.1002/anie.202000416 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 205.Lanis M. R., Kim S., and Schneck J. P., “Hydrogels in the immune context: In vivo applications for modulating immune responses in cancer therapy,” Gels 11(11), 889 (2025). 10.3390/gels11110889 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 206.Zielonka J., Podsiadły R., Zielonka M., Hardy M., and Kalyanaraman B., “On the use of peroxy-caged luciferin (PCL-1) probe for bioluminescent detection of inflammatory oxidants in vitro and in vivo—Identification of reaction intermediates and oxidant-specific minor products,” Free Radical Biol. Med. 99, 32–42 (2016). 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2016.07.023 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 207.Radan M., Carev I., Miloš M., and Tranfić Bakić M., “Phenylboronic acid in targeted cancer therapy and diagnosis,” Theranostics 15(9), 3733–3748 (2025). 10.7150/thno.104558 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 208.Lee D., Park S., Bae S. et al. , “Hydrogen peroxide-activatable antioxidant prodrug as a targeted therapeutic agent for ischemia-reperfusion injury,” Sci. Rep. 5, 16592 (2015). 10.1038/srep16592 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 209.Gao F. and Xiong Z., “Reactive oxygen species responsive polymers for drug delivery systems,” Front. Chem. 9, 649048 (2021). 10.3389/fchem.2021.649048 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 210.Lee S. H., Gupta M. K., Bang J. B., Bae H., and Sung H. J., “Current progress in reactive oxygen species (ROS)—Responsive materials for biomedical applications,” Adv. Healthcare Mater. 2(6), 908–915 (2013). 10.1002/adhm.201200423 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 211.Zhang N., Wang D., Jing X., Yang T., Yang H., and Meng L., “pH/ROS dual-responsive polymer-drug-based nanocarriers: Click-reaction preparation and fluorescence imaging-guided chemotherapy and photodynamic therapy,” ACS Appl. Bio Mater. 4(8), 6294–6303 (2021). 10.1021/acsabm.1c00569 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 212.Zhang W., Hu X., Shen Q., and Xing D., “Mitochondria-specific drug release and reactive oxygen species burst induced by polyprodrug nanoreactors can enhance chemotherapy,” Nat. Commun. 10(1), 1704 (2019). 10.1038/s41467-019-09566-3 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding authors upon reasonable request.


Articles from APL Bioengineering are provided here courtesy of American Institute of Physics

RESOURCES