Skip to main content
ACS AuthorChoice logoLink to ACS AuthorChoice
. 2026 Mar 20;18(12):18428–18435. doi: 10.1021/acsami.5c24444

From π to σ: Enhanced Charge Transport in Iodine-Substituted Benzene Junctions

Shintaro Fujii †,*, Itsuki Yoshikawa , Motomu Miura , Haruki Goto , Tomoaki Nishino , Masaichi Saito ‡,*
PMCID: PMC13051429  PMID: 41860342

Abstract

Understanding how nonbonded atoms contribute to charge transport offers a pathway to molecular conduction mechanisms beyond conventional π-delocalization. Iodine-substituted benzenes provide a simple and structurally well-defined platform in which halogen–metal anchoring and potential σ-type interactions can be modulated solely by substituent number and topology. Here we investigate p-, m-, and o-diiodobenzene, 1,2,4,5-tetraiodobenzene, and hexaiodobenzene to elucidate how substitution patterns regulate the balance between π-dominated and σ-involved transport in single-molecule junctions. Break-junction measurements reveal conventional π-HOMO transport in the para isomer, destructive quantum interference in the meta isomer, and the absence of stable junction formation in the ortho isomer, where adjacent iodine atoms create a very short and geometrically constrained effective junction length. The tetraiodo derivative shows only modest conductance enhancement, indicating that partial substitution does not generate a continuous σ-framework. In contrast, hexaiodobenzene exhibits a single, narrow, and contact-insensitive conductance peak and positive thermopower, and the corresponding IV analysis yields a HOMO level only ∼0.9 eV from the Fermi level. Together with molecular-orbital calculations, these results lead us to conclude that σ-involved HOMO-mediated transport emerges only when a complete peripheral iodine ring is present. By establishing a substituent-number-controlled transition from π-dominated to σ-involved transport in a chemically simple series, this work provides a concise design principle for accessing nonbonded σ-delocalized channels in aromatic molecular junctions.

Keywords: break junction, σ-delocalization, charge transport, thermopower, I−V characteristics


graphic file with name am5c24444_0008.jpg


graphic file with name am5c24444_0007.jpg

1. Introduction

Understanding and controlling charge transport through single molecules is a central challenge in molecular electronics, offering prospects for the realization of ultrasmall electronic devices with tailored quantum functionalities. Molecular junctions, in which an individual molecule bridges two metal electrodes, provide a powerful platform to probe fundamental charge transport phenomena at the single molecule scale. Over the past two decades, research in this field has primarily focused on π-conjugated molecules, where delocalized π-orbitals facilitate efficient charge transport and underpin a variety of quantum interference and thermoelectric effects at the nanoscale. Although these studies have deepened our knowledge of π-mediated conduction, relying exclusively on π-delocalized systems constrains the structural and functional diversity available for molecular design.

σ-Delocalized systems formed through through-space interactions among nonbonded atoms represent a complementary and less explored class of molecular conductors. In this work, the term σ-delocalization does not refer to covalent σ-conjugation along bonded backbones, as in alkanes or oligosilanes, nor to σ-bonds within an aromatic ring. Instead, it specifically denotes a σ-type orbital manifold arising from through-space overlap among nonbonded peripheral atoms, such as the in-plane lone-pair orbitals of iodine substituents. In fully substituted halogenated benzenes, dense peripheral substitution enables adjacent iodine atoms to interact electronically without direct covalent bonding, forming a σ-type orbital manifold distributed around the molecular periphery (Figure a). Importantly, charge transport is governed not by the formation of σ bonds themselves but by the transport-relevant frontier orbital within this σ-type manifold; its phase characteristics, which are critical for electronic coupling, are illustrated schematically in Figure b. Because these orbitals are spatially extended and can couple to metal electrodes through multiple equivalent anchoring sites, they provide an alternative pathway for charge transport that differs fundamentally from conventional π-mediated conduction.

1.

1

Schematic illustration of σ-involved charge transport in iodine-substituted benzene junctions. (a) Formation of a σ-type orbital manifold via through-space overlap of nonbonded iodine lone-pair orbitals in hexaiodobenzene (C6I6). Dense peripheral iodine substitution enables electronic interactions among adjacent iodine atoms without formation of covalent I–I bonds, giving rise to a delocalized σ-type orbital manifold around the molecular periphery. (b) Transport-relevant frontier orbital corresponding to the HOMO within this σ-type manifold. Charge transport is governed by this frontier orbital, which exhibits antibonding character, rather than by σ-bond formation itself. For comparison, the π-type HOMO of p-C6H4I2 is shown as an inset. (c) Chemical structures of the iodine-substituted benzene molecules investigated in this study.

In this work, we investigate single-molecule transport through iodine-substituted benzenes (Figure c) to elucidate the cooperative effects of anchoring and σ-delocalization. In this study, σ-delocalization refers to through-space interactions among nonbonded peripheral iodine atoms, distinct from σ-conjugation in covalently bonded backbones such as alkanes or oligosilanes. , Compared with the previously studied selenium-substituted systems, ,, the iodine-substituted systems form well-defined metal–molecule contacts through Au–halogen bonding , and serve as model systems for elucidating the interplay between anchoring effects and σ-type charge transport, owing to their single binding motif and the relatively simple junction structures and electronic states. This framework allows us to identify substituent-controlled transitions between π-dominated and σ-involved transport pathways across a structurally simple molecular series. However, the electron-withdrawing nature of iodine substitution shifts the HOMO energy further from the electrode Fermi level (E F) in π-delocalized systems, thereby reducing both conductance and thermopower. Systematic break junction (BJ) measurements on para- and meta-diiodobenzene and hexaiodobenzene reveal a clear structure–property relationship: the para isomer shows reproducible conductance plateaus and finite thermopower, the meta isomer exhibits strongly suppressed conductance due to destructive quantum interference. The tetraiodo derivative shows only modest conductance enhancement. In contrast, the hexa-substituted derivative achieves enhanced conductance via the σ-involved system. Notably, only hexaiodobenzene exhibits a single, narrow conductance peak that is relatively insensitive to the specific Au–I binding site. This behavior suggests that, owing to the high symmetry of C6I6 and the presence of multiple equivalent Au–I binding sites, the conductance distribution is relatively insensitive to the specific iodine atoms involved in electrode contact, compared with lower-symmetry derivatives.

Together with theoretical analysis, these findings establish iodine substitution as a fundamental model for a unique molecular design principle that leverages both robust metal–halogen contacts and σ-mediated charge transport. Beyond expanding the scope of molecular junction architectures, our results demonstrate that σ-systems can be strategically harnessed to complement π-systems, thereby advancing the fundamental understanding and practical design of molecular conductors.

2. Methods

2.1. Materials

1,4-Diiodobenzene (p-C6H4I2, Tokyo Chemical Industry, purity >98%),1,3-diiodobenzene (m-C6H4I2, Tokyo Chemical Industry, purity >99%), 1,2-diiodobenzene (o-C6H4I2, Tokyo Chemical Industry, purity >98%), 1,2,4,5-tetraiodobenzene (1,2,4,5-C6H2I4, BLD Pharmatech, purity >95%), and 1,2,3,4,5,6-hexaiodobenzene (C6I6, Sigma-Aldrich, L162558) were purchased from commercial sources and used without further purification. A gold (Au) wire (Nilaco, 0.3 mm diameter, 99.95% purity) was mechanically cut to fabricate STM tips. Au(111) substrates were prepared by thermal evaporation of Au onto freshly cleaved mica, followed by annealing at 500 °C for 2 h. The Au(111) substrates were flame annealed and cleaned before use. For sample preparation, Au substrates were immersed in 1 mg/mL DMF solution of each molecule for at least 1 h. After immersion, the substrates were dried under an inert gas flow.

2.2. Conductance Measurements

The conductance measurements were performed by a commercially available ambient scanning tunnelling microscopy (STM) (MS-10 and Nanoscope V, Bruker) with a signal access module III (Bruker), an external piezo driver (M-2141, MES-TEK), and a data-acquisition-device with LabVIEW2016 (NI PXI-4461, National Instruments). In BJ method, an Au-tip was repeatedly moved in and out of contact with the Au(111) substrate in the presence of the molecules. After the breakage of the Au point contact, a small gap with nanosized electrodes was prepared between the Au tip and the Au substrate. A surface-deposited molecule can be trapped into the nanogap and a single-molecule junction (SMJ) can be fabricated using the BJ technique. The left panels of Figure show 2D conductance versus stretching distance histograms of the conductance traces of the SMJs, in which electronic currents of the SMJs are repeatedly measured during the stretching process of the junctions by applying a fixed bias voltage between the Au sample electrodes and the Au-STM tip (Figure S1). In the 2D histograms, the displacement was defined as zero at the point where the conductance dropped below 0.01 G 0 for m- and o-C6H4I2, and below 0.5 G 0 for the other molecules, and all conductance traces were overlaid accordingly. As a result, the statistical distributions in the 2D histograms reflect the most probable conductance values and effective junction elongation of the SMJs. The 1D conductance histograms in Figure were constructed from the same data set used in the 2D histograms.

2.

2

Two-dimensional (2D) histograms of conductance vs junction-stretching distance traces and 1D conductance histograms for (a) p-C6H4I2, (b) m-C6H4I2, (c) o-C6H4I2, (d) 1,2,4,5-C6H2I4, and (e) C6I6. The bias voltage was 0.4 V for o-C6H4I2, 0.25 V for m-C6H4I2, and 0.1 V for the others. G 0 denotes the conductance quantum (G 0 = 2e 2/h). A linear bin size of 0.01 nm and a logarithmic bin size (Δlog­(G/G 0)) of 0.01 are used. The histograms were constructed from 3000 measurements for o-C6H4I2 and 10 000 measurements for the others. In the 1D conductance histograms, the distributions were fitted with a Gaussian function, except for o-C6H4I2, and each Gaussian function is represented by blue lines. (f) Plots of the observed peak conductance values. The y-axis is shown on a logarithmic scale (left) and a linear scale (right). The error bars represent the fwhm.

2.3. Thermopower Measurements

In the thermopower measurements, the temperature of the STM tip was maintained at room temperature while that of the substrate was controlled by a Peltier device (CP0.8–31–06L, Laird Technologies) using a temperature controller (Model 331, Lake Shore Cryotronics). The substrate temperature was monitored with a resistive thermometer. Meanwhile, SMJs were made by the BJ method at a constant bias voltage of 5 mV. After forming the SMJ, the current–voltage (IV) curve of the junction was measured by varying the tip bias voltage from 5 mV to – 5 mV at a constant electrode spacing, while applying a constant temperature difference to the junction (Figure S2). The thermoelectric voltage was determined as the bias voltage shift at zero current in the IV curve with and without a temperature gradient in the molecular junction. Details of the experimental setup are described in previous reports. ,

2.4. Current–Voltage Characteristic Measurements

The IV curves of the SMJs26–28 were obtained according to the following procedure. An Au STM tip was brought into contact with an Au substrate until the formation of an Au point contact was confirmed by a conductance greater than 1 G 0. The tip was then withdrawn at a speed of approximately 10 nm s–1 to break the point contact, resulting in a nanoscale gap between the Au electrodes and enabling the stochastic formation of a SMJ. The current passing through the molecular junction was monitored at a fixed bias voltage of 100 mV. After the conductance decreased below 1 G 0, the tip position was fixed and an IV curve was recorded by sweeping the bias voltage from 100 to 2000 mV, then from 100 to −2000 mV, and finally back to 100 mV at a constant tip–sample separation. The SMJ was subsequently broken by retracting the tip from the substrate. To capture the structural variations of the junction, the making/breaking cycle was repeated so that a new junction configuration was formed prior to each IV measurement. ,

2.5. DFT Calculations

The optimized geometries were obtained by DFT calculations at the B3LYP/6–31+G­(d) for C and H atoms and the B3LYP/SDD level for I atoms using the Gaussian 16 program (Figures ,).

4.

4

Calculated molecular orbital levels and spatial distributions for p-C6H4I2 and C6I6. The HOMO of p-C6H4I2 is dominated by π-orbitals, whereas that of C6I6 is dominated by σ-orbitals. Gray, white, and purple spheres represent C, H, and I atoms, respectively.

5.

5

Calculated HOMO levels of benzene with increasing iodine substitution. Red and black lines represent orbital levels with π- and σ-character, respectively. Spatial distributions are shown for the σ-character orbitals. As the degree of substitution increases, interactions among the peripheral iodine atoms lead to splitting of σ-type orbitals into bonding and antibonding states, as indicated by the green arrows. A similar upward shift of HOMO energy levels, attributed to σ-delocalization among adjacent selenium atoms, is experimentally observed in the series of selenium-substituted benzenes.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Single-Molecule Conductance of Iodine-Substituted Benzenes

Guided by the conceptual framework illustrated in Figure , we examine how the number and topology of iodine substituents regulate the balance between π-dominated and σ-involved transport pathways in single-molecule junctions. We first investigated the charge transport properties of iodine-substituted benzenes using the break junction (BJ) technique under ambient conditions (Figure and Figure S1). Figure a shows a representative two-dimensional (2D) plot of conductance versus stretching distance, together with a one-dimensional (1D) conductance histogram for para-diiodobenzene (p-C6H4I2), both exhibiting a distinct distribution centered at 0.9 × 10–4 G 0 (log G/G 0 ≈ – 4.0 ± 0.8). We note that no irreversible conductance changes or abrupt switching events were observed under the low-bias conditions employed in this study, indicating that Au–I coordination remains stable and that Au–C bond formation does not occur during the measurements. Although p-C6H4I2 is the shortest molecule among those investigated, its conductance remains on the order of 10–4 G 0 rather than reaching higher values expected for such a short tunneling length. This behavior reflects the balance between the short molecular length, which favors higher conductance, and the Au–I molecule–electrode coupling, which is weaker than that of covalent anchoring groups such as Au–S and thus limits the overall conductance. The present value is somewhat reduced compared with the previous measurement for 1,4-diiodobenzene in solution (3.6 × 10–4 G 0). Nevertheless, it is still in reasonable agreement, which may partly reflect the different experimental environments (air vs solution), thereby confirming that the Au–I interaction enables stable junction formation. In contrast, meta-diiodobenzene (m-C6H4I2) displays a significantly reduced conductance of ∼ 10–6 G 0 with log G/G 0 ∼ −6.0 ± 0.4 (Figure b), which is over 2 orders of magnitude lower than that of the para isomer. Such pronounced suppression is consistent with destructive quantum interference (DQI) in π-orbital-mediated transport, a phenomenon well established for meta-connected π systems. For the ortho-diiodobenzene (o-C6H4I2), no junction formation is confirmed (Figure c). The geometric arrangement of the substituents reduces the effective molecular span between the iodine atoms, which may lead to ill-defined contacts and hinder the reliable formation of stable junctions and reproducible conductance. For the tetraiodobenzene (1,2,4,5-C6H2I4), a slight increase in conductance to 1.5 × 10–4 G 0 (log G/G 0 ≈ – 3.8 ± 0.8) is observed compared with p-C6H4I2. (Figure d). Strikingly, the hexaiodobenzene (C6I6) junctions exhibit a higher conductance peak at 2.6 × 10–4 G 0 (log G/G 0 ≈ – 3.6 ± 0.5, Figure e). It should be noted that the displacement axis in the conductance–displacement histograms represents an effective junction elongation, which includes contributions from electrode snapback and atomic rearrangements and does not correspond directly to the geometric molecular length. Within the width of the conductance distributions, a systematic upward trend is observed from p-C6H4I2 to 1,2,4,5-C6H2I4 and C6I6 (Figure f), suggesting that full peripheral iodine substitution is associated with enhanced charge transport. This enhancement cannot be rationalized solely by the contact geometry in π-orbital-mediated transport but rather suggests the emergence of a transport pathway consistent with σ-type orbital involvement. These results establish a clear structure–conductance relationship: para connectivity enables finite π-type conduction, meta connectivity enforces strong DQI, and full substitution yields conductance behavior consistent with σ-involved charge transport with enhanced conductance. Notably, the C6I6 junctions display a single conductance peak, similar to what was previously observed for hexa-selenium-substituted benzene. This behavior suggests that, in σ-involved systems, the overall conductance is likely to be relatively insensitive to which iodine sites are in contact with the Au electrodes, in contrast to π-mediated transport, where the conductance strongly depends on the specific contact geometry (Figure a,b).

3.2. Thermoelectric Properties

To further probe the nature of the conducting orbitals, we performed thermopower measurements ,,, of p-C6H4I2. The distribution of thermoelectric voltages as a function of temperature difference yielded a positive thermopower of +4.0 ± 3.2 μV K–1 (Figure a). The positive sign indicates that hole transport dominates, consistent with conduction through the HOMO, and confirms that the transport pathway in p-C6H4I2 is HOMO-mediated. In addition, thermopower measurements of C6I6 revealed thermopower of +5.0 ± 1.2 μV K–1 (Figure b,c and Figure S2). The thermopower values obtained for p-C6H4I2 and C6I6 overlap within experimental uncertainty. However, the thermopower distribution of C6I6 is narrower and more symmetric, indicating a more well-defined transport channel. As thermopower measurements primarily reflect the sign and energetic proximity of the dominant transport orbital, these results are consistent with HOMO-mediated transport but do not, by themselves, distinguish between π- and σ-type orbitals. Taking the expanded experimental data set as a whole, we therefore conclude that C6I6 exhibits σ-involved HOMO-mediated transport, with this assignment supported by the combined evidence from substituent-dependent conductance trends, geometric considerations, and the molecular orbital analysis described below.

3.

3

(a) Distribution of thermopower measured at a temperature difference (ΔT) of 19.4 K for p-C6H4I2, based on 1000 measurements. Thermopower S was calculated as S = −V thT, where V th and ΔT are the thermoelectric voltage and temperature difference across the molecular junction, respectively. Because the junction formation probability of p-C6H4I2 is relatively low under a temperature gradient, data collection was limited, and the thermopower was determined from thermoelectric voltage measurements at a single ΔT. The distribution of S was fitted with a Gaussian function (blue line), yielding a peak value of 4.0 ± 3.2 μV K–1. (b) Distributions of V th for C6I6 measured at different ΔT values, each based on 5000 measurements (left). Peak values were obtained by fitting the distributions with Gaussian functions. Plot of peak V th values vs ΔT for C6I6 (right). (c) Distribution of thermopower for C6I6 at ΔT = 25.5 K, based on 5000 measurements. The S value was calculated as S = −V thT, with a peak value of 5.0 ± 1.2 μV K–1.

3.3. Molecular Orbital Analysis

Density functional theory (DFT) calculations (Figures and ) provide deeper insight into the origin of the observed conductance trends. For p-C6H4I2, the HOMO is a π-type orbital on the benzene ring, whereas in C6I6 it transforms into a σ-type orbital distributed over the peripheral iodine atoms (Figure ). Within the single-level tunneling model, charge transport is governed by the frontier orbital energy ε relative to the electrode Fermi level and by the electronic coupling to electrodes Γ. At the zero bias limit, the transmission τ at E F is expressed as τ = Γ2/(ε 2 + Γ2). With increasing iodine substitution, the electron-withdrawing effect pushes the π-orbital levels to lower energies (larger |ε|), thereby suppressing π-mediated transport. At the same time, interactions among the iodine lone pairs generate σ-type orbitals, among which the frontier orbital approaches E F, thereby reducing ε for σ-mediated transport and enhancing their contribution (Figure ). In C6I6, dense packing of the substituents and steric congestion maximize this effect: ε for the σ-orbital becomes particularly small (see the upper right corner of Figure ), while Γ remains robust owing to well-defined Au–I contacts. As a result, the transmission at E F is enhanced, consistent with the experimentally observed conductance of 2.6 × 10–4 G 0. Thus, the overall conductance reflects a quantitative trade-off between diminished π-transport and emergent σ-transport, with the high conductance of C6I6 providing evidence for an increased contribution from σ-type orbitals in iodine-substituted molecular junctions. Here, the gas-phase DFT calculations are used solely to illustrate qualitative trends in orbital character and energy ordering, and are not intended to describe quantitative level alignment in the junction, which may be significantly modified by molecule–electrode interactions.

3.4. Molecular Orbital Level

To directly evaluate the energy alignment of the dominant transport orbital (HOMO) of C6I6, we measured the current–voltage (IV) characteristics of the C6I6 junctions and analyzed them within the framework of the single-level tunneling model. Figure a shows a 2D histogram of the measured IV curves. Each IV curve was fitted using the following eq (Figure b), which describes the current through a single-molecule junction, where Γ denotes the metal–molecule electronic coupling and ε represents the energy of the molecular level relative to the electrode Fermi level. ,

I(V)=2ehΓ[tan1(eV/2εΓ)+tan1(eV/2+εΓ)] 1

6.

6

(a) 2D map of the IV characteristics of C6I6 junctions, constructed from 20 000 experimentally obtained IV curves. The bin sizes along the x- and y-axes are 20 mV and 1 nA, respectively. (b) Example of the curve fitting. The solid and dotted lines represent the experimental and fitted results, respectively, with the following parameters: ε ≈ 0.96 eV and Γ ≈ 9 meV. (c and d) 1D histograms of ε and Γ, respectively, obtained from curve fitting. The solid and dotted lines represent the fitted results and each Gaussian component, respectively, with the following peak values: ε ≈ 0.93 and 1.15 eV and Γ ≈ 16 meV (Figure S3).

The model is used here as a convenient phenomenological description of off-resonant transport; although it does not capture the full multiorbital complexity, it provides a consistent framework to extract effective ε and Γ values. In this study, the single-level tunneling model is employed solely as a phenomenological framework to extract effective level alignment parameters and is not intended to describe transport mechanisms involving quantum interference; accordingly, it is not applied to meta-connected molecules in this study. To determine the ε and Γ values corresponding to the junctions formed in the conductance measurements at 0.1 V (log G/G 0 = – 3.6 ± 0.5, Figure e), the IV curves exhibiting conductance within this range were selected from the full set of measured curves to construct the histograms. As shown in Figure c,d, the 1D distributions of the fitted parameters yields ε ≈ 0.93 eV and Γ ≈ 16 meV. Another peak at ε ≈ 1.15 eV can be attributed to junction configurations with ill-defined metal–molecule contacts, likely induced by the application of high bias voltages (up to ± 2 V) in the IV measurements.

Using the gold work function of 5.3 eV, the corresponding HOMO energy of the C6I6 junction is estimated to be – 6.23 eV, which lies slightly closer to the Fermi level than the calculated gas-phase HOMO energy of – 6.28 eV (Figure ). Although orbital energies from DFT calculations on the isolated molecule cannot be directly compared with experimental level alignment, this qualitative proximity supports the internal consistency of our analysis without implying quantitative agreement.

Within the single level tunneling model, thermopower S of a single-molecule junction is described by the following equation.

S=π2kB2T3elnτ(E)E|E=EF=2π2kB2T3eεε2+Γ2 2

Using the experimentally determined values of ε and Γ yields S = 16 μV K–1 of the C6I6 junction, which is close to the upper end of the experimentally observed thermopower distribution (Figure c). Thermopower is highly sensitive to experimental factors, particularly the determination of the local temperature and the temperature difference across the junction. Because thermoelectric voltage is directly proportional to ΔT, such uncertainties can contribute to noticeable deviations between the calculated and measured values. Consequently, the calculated thermopower (16 μV K–1) shows only modest agreement with the measured value (∼5 μV K–1).

We note that a full microscopic identification of the transport channels would ultimately benefit from NEGF–DFT calculations of the transmission functions. However, for Au–I junctions, such calculations require extensive sampling of metal–molecule binding geometries, which is computationally demanding and beyond the scope of the present experimentally focused study. Instead, the present analysis relies on a self-consistent interpretation of experimentally accessible observables, including substituent-dependent conductance trends, junction stability, thermopower sign, and level alignment extracted from current–voltage characteristics. Within these experimentally grounded constraints, the observed transport behavior of C6I6 is most consistently explained by an increased contribution from σ-involved orbitals.

3.5. Interplay of Anchoring and σ-Delocalization

The formation of σ-delocalized orbitals among peripheral iodine atoms is consistent with previous UPS studies of polyiodobenzenes, which revealed pronounced through-space I···I interactions. An important aspect of iodine substitution is its dual role as both an anchoring group to electrodes and a σ-involved contributor. Previous studies have demonstrated that Au–I halogen bonding is stronger than Au–NH2 coordination, which accounts for the robust junction formation of p-C6H4I2, 1,2,4,5-C6H2I4, and C6I6. In C6I6, the cooperative action of Au–I contacts together with σ-type orbital contributions offers a plausible explanation for its enhanced conductance relative to the para isomer. This dual role of iodine substitutionstabilizing the metal–molecule contacts while enabling transport behavior consistent with σ-involved pathwayshighlights its potential as a versatile design element for single-molecule electronics. Together with the thermopower and IV analysis, these conductance trends reinforce our conclusion that C6I6 supports σ-involved transport only when a complete peripheral iodine ring is present. We emphasize that the pronounced σ-channel transport discussed here is observed most clearly in fully substituted benzene derivatives such as C6I6, and that extending this behavior to more general molecular systems will require careful molecular design and further experimental validation.

4. Conclusions

This study demonstrates how the number and topology of nonbonded halogen substituents regulate the balance between π-dominated and σ-involved transport pathways in iodine-substituted benzene junctions. Break-junction measurements across five systematically varied molecules reveal a clear structure–transport relationship: para-diiodobenzene exhibits conventional π-HOMO transport, the meta isomer shows destructive quantum interference, and the ortho isomer fails to form stable junctions because the adjacent iodine substituents yield a very short and geometrically constrained effective junction length that prevents the molecule from adopting a reproducible bridging configuration. The tetraiodo derivative displays only modest conductance enhancement, indicating that partial iodine substitution does not generate a continuous σ-framework. In contrast, hexaiodobenzene exhibits a single, narrow, and contact-insensitive conductance peak accompanied by positive thermopower, signaling robust HOMO-mediated transport.

While the absolute values of conductance and thermopower overlap within experimental distributions, the combined substituent-dependent trends, junction stability, and level-alignment analysis consistently indicate an increased contribution from σ-type orbitals in C6I6. Combined with molecular-orbital calculations and level alignment extracted from IV analysis, these observations lead us to conclude that C6I6 exhibits σ-involved transport pathways that emerge only when a full peripheral ring of nonbonded iodine atoms is present. Together, these findings identify a minimal structural requirement, namely a continuous halogen periphery, for accessing transport behavior consistent with σ-involved pathways in aromatic systems. Although NEGF–DFT transport calculations were beyond the scope of this experimentally focused study, the clear substituent-dependent trends revealed here provide a solid foundation for future theoretical work. Such calculations, particularly those that sample multiple Au–I binding geometries, will be valuable for quantifying the σ-involved contributions identified experimentally. By revealing a substituent-number-controlled transition from π-dominated to σ-involved transport in a chemically simple series, this work offers a concise and general design principle for engineering nonbonded σ-delocalized channels that complement traditional π-based molecular conductors. Future transport calculations that explicitly evaluate transmission eigenchannels for realistic Au–I junction geometries will be valuable for further quantifying the σ-involved contributions identified experimentally in this work.

Supplementary Material

am5c24444_si_001.pdf (410.3KB, pdf)

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by JST SICORP (JPMJSC22C2), the Precise Measurement Technology Promotion Foundation, and JSPS KAKENHI (JP23K04517 for S.F. and JP24K01464 for M.S.). M.S. acknowledges research grants from the Nagase Science and Technology Foundation and the Mitsubishi Foundation.

The Supporting Information is available free of charge at https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acsami.5c24444.

  • Representative conductance traces, conductance histograms, time course of thermoelectric voltage measurements, and additional IV analysis (PDF)

The authors declare no competing financial interest.

References

  1. Evers F., Korytár R., Tewari S., van Ruitenbeek J. M.. Advances and Challenges in Single-Molecule Electron Transport. Rev. Mod. Phys. 2020;92:035001. doi: 10.1103/RevModPhys.92.035001. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  2. Dief E. M., Low P. J., Díez-Pérez I., Darwish N.. Advances in Single-Molecule Junctions as Tools for Chemical and Biochemical Analysis. Nat. Chem. 2023;15:600–614. doi: 10.1038/s41557-023-01178-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Zhuang D., Wang D., Xu J., Tang Z., Ching J. J., Ling T. C., Li X., Hong W.. Frontiers in Single-Molecule Junction Detection: A Review of Recent Innovations and Breakthroughs. Langmuir. 2025;41:12841–12857. doi: 10.1021/acs.langmuir.5c00270. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Gehring P., Thijssen J. M., van der Zant H. S. J.. Single-Molecule Quantum-Transport Phenomena in Break Junctions. Nat. Rev. Phys. 2019;1:381–396. doi: 10.1038/s42254-019-0055-1. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  5. Liu J., Huang X., Wang F., Hong W.. Quantum Interference Effects in Charge Transport through Single-Molecule Junctions: Detection, Manipulation, and Application. Acc. Chem. Res. 2019;52:151–160. doi: 10.1021/acs.accounts.8b00429. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Liu S.-X., Ismael A. K., Al-Jobory A., Lambert C. J.. Signatures of Room-Temperature Quantum Interference in Molecular Junctions. Acc. Chem. Res. 2023;56:322–331. doi: 10.1021/acs.accounts.2c00726. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Rincón-García L., Evangeli C., Rubio-Bollinger G., Agraït N.. Thermopower Measurements in Molecular Junctions. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2016;45:4285–4306. doi: 10.1039/C6CS00141F. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Fang C., Li Y., Wang S., Liang M., Yan C., Liu J., Hong W.. Thermoelectric and Thermal Properties of Molecular Junctions: Mechanisms, Characterization Methods and Applications. Chem. Commun. 2025;61:4447–4464. doi: 10.1039/D4CC06822J. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. He P., Jang J., Kang H., Yoon H. J.. Thermoelectricity in Molecular Tunnel Junctions. Chem. Rev. 2025;125:2953–3004. doi: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.4c00886. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Furukawa S., Fujita M., Kanatomi Y., Minoura M., Hatanaka M., Morokuma K., Ishimura K., Saito M.. Double Aromaticity Arising from σ- and π-Rings. Commun. Chem. 2018;1:60. doi: 10.1038/s42004-018-0057-4. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  11. Saito M., Suzuki T., Takahashi K., Seko S., Furukawa S., Ishimura K.. σ-Delocalization between Non-bonded Selenium Atoms on Multiply Se-substituted Benzenes. Chem. Lett. 2023;52:97–99. doi: 10.1246/cl.220489. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  12. Sagl D. J., Martin J. C.. The Stable Singlet Ground State Dication of Hexaiodobenzene: Possibly a σ-Delocalized Dication. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1988;110:5827–5833. doi: 10.1021/ja00225a038. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  13. Ciofini I., Lainé P. P., Adamo C.. Quantifying Electron Delocalization in Orthogonal Channels: Theoretical Investigation of σ and π Aromaticity in [C6I 6 ]2+ and [C6Cl6]2+ . Chem. Phys. Lett. 2007;435:171–175. doi: 10.1016/j.cplett.2006.12.058. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  14. Havenith R. W. A., Fowler P. W., Fias S., Bultinck P.. Evidence from Current-Density Mapping for σ-Delocalisation in the Aromatic Hexaiodobenzene Cation. Tetrahedron Lett. 2008;49:1421–1424. doi: 10.1016/j.tetlet.2007.12.039. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  15. Fujii S., Seko S., Tanaka T., Yoshihara Y., Furukawa S., Nishino T., Saito M.. Charge Transport through Single-Molecule Junctions with σ-Delocalized Systems. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2024;146:19566–19571. doi: 10.1021/jacs.4c06732. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Su T. A., Li H., Klausen R. S., Kim N. T., Neupane M., Leighton J. L., Steigerwald M. L., Venkataraman L., Nuckolls C.. Silane and Germane Molecular Electronics. Acc. Chem. Res. 2017;50:1088–1095. doi: 10.1021/acs.accounts.7b00059. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Jovanovic M., Michl J.. Alkanes versus Oligosilanes: Conformational Effects on σ-Electron Delocalization. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2022;144:463–477. doi: 10.1021/jacs.1c10616. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Komoto Y., Fujii S., Hara K., Kiguchi M.. Single Molecular Bridging of Au Nanogap Using Aryl Halide Molecules. J. Phys. Chem. C. 2013;117:24277–24282. doi: 10.1021/jp404858x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  19. Wilcken R., Zimmermann M. O., Lange A., Joerger A. C., Boeckler F. M.. Principles and Applications of Halogen Bonding in Medicinal Chemistry and Chemical Biology. J. Med. Chem. 2013;56:1363–1388. doi: 10.1021/jm3012068. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Xu B., Tao N. J.. Measurement of Single-Molecule Resistance by Repeated Formation of Molecular Junctions. Science. 2003;301:1221–1223. doi: 10.1126/science.1087481. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Solomon G. C., Andrews D. Q., Hansen T., Goldsmith R. H., Wasielewski M. R., Van Duyne R. P., Ratner M. A.. Understanding Quantum Interference in Coherent Molecular Conduction. J. Chem. Phys. 2008;129:054701. doi: 10.1063/1.2958275. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Ernzerhof M.. Simple Orbital Theory for the Molecular Electrician. J. Chem. Phys. 2011;135:014104. doi: 10.1063/1.3603444. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Tsuji Y., Staykov A., Yoshizawa K.. Orbital Views of Molecular Conductance Perturbed by Anchor Units. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2011;133:5955–5965. doi: 10.1021/ja111021e. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Komoto Y., Isshiki Y., Fujii S., Nishino T., Kiguchi M.. Evaluation of Electronic Structure of the Single-molecule Junction Based on Current-Voltage Measurement and Thermopower Measurement-Application to C60 Single-Molecule Junction. Chem. - Asian J. 2017;12:440–445. doi: 10.1002/asia.201601392. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Fujii S., Montes E., Cho H., Yue Y., Koike M., Nishino T., Vázquez H., Kiguchi M.. Mechanically Tuned Thermopower of Single-Molecule Junctions. Adv. Electron. Mater. 2022;8:2200700. doi: 10.1002/aelm.202200700. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  26. Isshiki Y., Fujii S., Nishino T., Kiguchi M.. Fluctuation in Interface and Electronic Structure of Single-Molecule Junctions Investigated by Current versus Bias Voltage Characteristics. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2018;140:3760–3767. doi: 10.1021/jacs.7b13694. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Tsutsui M., Taniguchi M., Kawai T.. Local Heating in Metal–Molecule–Metal Junctions. Nano Lett. 2008;8:3293–3297. doi: 10.1021/nl801669e. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Isshiki Y., Montes E., Nishino T., Vázquez H., Fujii S.. Resolving Molecular Frontier Orbitals in Molecular Junctions with kHz Resolution. Chem. Sci. 2024;15:17328–17336. doi: 10.1039/D4SC05285D. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Frisch, M. J. ; Trucks, G. W. ; Schlegel, H. B. ; Scuseria, G. E. ; Robb, M. A. ; Cheeseman, J. R. ; Scalmani, G. ; Barone, V. ; Petersson, G. A. ; Nakatsuji, H. ; Li, X. ; Caricato, M. ; Marenich, A. V. ; Bloino, J. ; Janesko, B. G. ; Gomperts, R. ; Mennucci, B. ; Hratchian, H. P. ; Ortiz, J. V. ; Izmaylov, A. F. ; Sonnenberg, J. L. ; Williams-Young, D. ; Ding, F. ; Lipparini, F. ; Egidi, F. ; Goings, J. ; Peng, B. ; Petrone, A. ; Henderson, T. ; Ranasinghe, D. ; Zakrzewski, V. G. ; Gao, J. ; Rega, N. ; Zheng, G. ; Liang, W. ; Hada, M. ; Ehara, M. ; Toyota, K. ; Fukuda, R. ; Hasegawa, J. ; Ishida, M. ; Nakajima, T. ; Honda, Y. ; Kitao, O. ; Nakai, H. ; Vreven, T. ; Throssell, K. ; Montgomery, J. A., Jr. ; Peralta, J. E. ; Ogliaro, F. ; Bearpark, M. J. ; Heyd, J. J. ; Brothers, E. N. ; Kudin, K. N. ; Staroverov, V. N. ; Keith, T. A. ; Kobayashi, R. ; Normand, J. ; Raghavachari, K. ; Rendell, A. P. ; Burant, J. C. ; Iyengar, S. S. ; Tomasi, J. ; Cossi, M. ; Millam, J. M. ; Klene, M. ; Adamo, C. ; Cammi, R. ; Ochterski, J. W. ; Martin, R. L. ; Morokuma, K. ; Farkas, O. ; Foresman, J. B. ; Fox, D. J. . Gaussian 16, rev. C.02; Gaussian, Inc.: Wallingford, CT, 2016. [Google Scholar]
  30. Starr R. L., Fu T., Doud E. A., Stone I., Roy X., Venkataraman L.. Gold–Carbon Contacts from Oxidative Addition of Aryl Iodides. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2020;142:7128–7133. doi: 10.1021/jacs.0c01466. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Reddy P., Jang S. Y., Segalman R. A., Majumdar A.. Thermoelectricity in Molecular Junctions. Science. 2007;315:1568–1571. doi: 10.1126/science.1137149. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Cuevas, J. C. ; Scheer, E. . Molecular Electronics An Introduction to Theory and Experiment; World Scientific: Singapore, 2010. [Google Scholar]
  33. Lide, D. R. CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, 1998. [Google Scholar]
  34. Novak I., Li D. B., Kovač B.. Electronic Structure of Polyiodobenzenes. J. Phys. Chem. A. 2002;106:2850–2854. doi: 10.1021/jp0138330. [DOI] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

am5c24444_si_001.pdf (410.3KB, pdf)

Articles from ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces are provided here courtesy of American Chemical Society

RESOURCES