Skip to main content
Journal of Pharmacopuncture logoLink to Journal of Pharmacopuncture
. 2026 Mar 31;29(1):136–148. doi: 10.3831/KPI.2026.29.1.136

Safety Evaluation of Spray-Dried Curcuma longa L. Extract for Pharmacopuncture: acute toxicity and neurobehavioral assessment in zebrafish

Subhan Rullyansyah 1,2, Idha Kusumawati 3,4,5,*, Intan Safinar Ismail 6,7, Djoko Agus Purwanto 3, Dewi Isadiartuti 3, Muhammad Safwan Bin Ahamad Bustaman 7, Muhammad Afiq Bin Ngadni 6, Rizky Rafi Rahmawan 5, Ananda Permata Fitri 5, Charlyna Veronika Puspitasari Pattymahu 8
PMCID: PMC13054879  PMID: 41953547

Abstract

Objectives

Curcuma longa L. (CL) exhibits potent anti-inflammatory and analgesic properties suitable for pharmacopuncture; however, the clinical application of CL is severely hindered by poor aqueous solubility. Moreover, traditional ethanol-based extracts are unsuitable for safe parenteral administration due to the risk of tissue necrosis and neurotoxicity at sensitive acupoint sites. Thus, no systematic safety evaluation of water-soluble CL extract (CLE) formulations for injection has yet been conducted.

Methods

Spray-dried CLE (SDCLE) was prepared by spray-drying CLE with lactose (19 w/w) as the microencapsulation agent. The curcuminoid composition was quantified using a validated high-performance thin-layer chromatography (HP-TLC) method. The solubility of SDCLE was compared with that of native CLE (NCLE). Acute toxicity (LC50), survival, and locomotor behavior were determined using probit regression and automated EthoVision XT tracking following a 96-hour exposure of adult zebrafish to SDCLE (0-500 mg/L).

Results

SDCLE, formulated to contain 10% (w/w) NCLE, exhibited a curcumin content of 0.148 ± 0.02 mg/g. This formulation showed markedly enhanced aqueous solubility (91.30% at a 130 dilution) compared with NCLE alone (55.78% at the same dilution), yielding clear, homogeneous solutions suitable for parenteral administration. Post-exposure acute toxicity assessment in zebrafish revealed a time-dependent decrease in LC50 values, from 469.96 mg/L at 24 h to 288.13 mg/L at 96 h. Acute toxicity analysis identified a no-observed-effect concentration (NOEC) of 144.07 mg/L and a lowest-observed-effect concentration (LOEC) of 187.28 mg/L. Exposure to concentrations ≤ 200 mg/L resulted in > 95% survival and preserved normal locomotor activity, whereas concentrations ≥ 300 mg/L induced pronounced neurobehavioral suppression, characterized by a 35% reduction in swimming distance and a six-fold increase in inactivity.

Conclusion

Spray-drying overcame the solubility limitations of CLE, enabling aqueous reconstitution for pharmacopuncture applications. A 96-hour LC50 of 288.13 mg/L was employed to define mortality, while neurobehavioral endpoints indicated toxicity at sublethal concentrations, supporting the safety of concentrations ≤ 200 mg/L for rational SDCLE dose selection.

Keywords: Curcuma longa, pharmacopuncture, spray-drying, zebrafish, acute toxicity, neurobehavioral safety

INTRODUCTION

Pharmacopuncture involves the direct injection of herbal extracts into acupuncture points, combining mechanical stimulation with localized pharmacological effects [1, 2]. Pharmacopuncture was widely adopted in South Korea between 2010 and 2014, during which nearly all inpatients and most outpatients received this treatment. Meanwhile, mandatory accreditation was introduced in 2018, incorporating 165 criteria consistent with the Korean Good Manufacturing Practice (KGMP) standards [3, 4]. Direct acupoint injection bypasses gastrointestinal and hepatic metabolism, resulting in 100-1,000-fold higher tissue concentrations and prolonged activity through depot formation [1, 5, 6], synergistically combining meridian regulation with localized herbal effects [1, 7, 8]. Nonetheless, clinical translation requires pharmaceutical development to address solubility, sterility, tissue compatibility, and preclinical toxicological evaluations [4, 9, 10].

Curcuma longa L. (CL) contains 2-9% curcuminoids (primarily curcumin) and has been used as an anti-inflammatory agent for more than 5,000 years [11-13]. Curcumin modulates multiple molecular targets, including NF-κB, COX-2, and TNF-α, thereby offering therapeutic potential for inflammatory, neurodegenerative, and metabolic disorders [11, 14, 15]. However, the clinical utility of curcumin is limited by the associated extreme lipophilicity (11 ng/mL aqueous solubility), P-glycoprotein-mediated efflux, and rapid degradation at physiological pH [14, 16, 17]. Extensive hepatic first-pass metabolism yields less active conjugates, resulting in only nanomolar plasma levels even after 10-12 g oral doses, far below the 5-50 μM efficacy threshold [7, 11, 14]. Therefore, these pharmacokinetic constraints necessitate injectable delivery to bypass gastrointestinal barriers and achieve therapeutic drug concentrations at target sites [1, 4, 7].

Spray-drying technology can address the solubility barrier by converting semisolid CL extract (CLE) into free-flowing powders using lactose as a microencapsulation carrier [18, 19]. Consequently, spray-drying produces spray-dried CLE (SDCLE) with enhanced aqueous dispersibility, making CLE suitable for reconstitution as a clear injectable solution. However, evaluating pharmaceutical improvements requires a systematic comparison with non-spray-dried CLE or native CLE (NCLE) as control formulations. Nonetheless, whether spray-drying genuinely enhances solubility and safety profiles or simply enables the formulation of an otherwise unusable extract will remain unclear without direct comparison. Therefore, this comparative framework is essential for demonstrating the translational value of pharmacopuncture applications.

Prior toxicological studies have focused exclusively on isolated curcumin, with no investigations examining whole-extract formulations that include curcuminoids, turmerones, polysaccharides, and minor alkaloids combined with pharmaceutical carriers [4, 20, 21]. More importantly, no comparative safety evaluations have been conducted between spray-dried and non-spray-dried formulations. Pharmacopuncture requires regulatory oversight comparable to that of pharmaceutical injections, necessitating comprehensive toxicological data, including acute toxicity thresholds and neurobehavioral safety profiles [3, 9, 22]. The absence of comparative safety data on SDCLE versus NCLE represents a critical gap that hinders standardization and regulatory approval of spray-dried herbal extracts for acupoint injection [18, 23].

Zebrafish (Danio rerio) are an effective vertebrate model for toxicology screening, exhibiting approximately 70% genomic homology with humans and the conservation of disease-related genes [24-26]. Moreover, the rapid development, real-time monitoring transparency, and the small size of zebrafish enable high-throughput screening consistent with the 3Rs principles (Replacement, Reduction, Refinement) [3, 24, 25]. OECD Test Guideline 203 establishes standardized protocols for determining LC50 values and assessing acute toxicity [18, 23]. Neurobehavioral endpoints can detect toxic effects at concentrations below lethal thresholds, providing sensitive indicators for safety evaluations [9, 18, 27]. Therefore, by utilizing these sensitive methodologies, toxic effects can be identified at concentrations much lower than those required to induce lethality [25, 26].

This study compared SDCLE with NCLE to establish pharmaceutical and toxicological profiles for the development of pharmacopuncture. The specific objectives were to (1) quantify the solubility improvement achieved by spray-drying, (2) verify curcuminoid preservation during processing [11, 12], (3) determine comparative acute toxicity (LC50 values) over 96-hour exposure in adult zebrafish [9, 18, 19, 28], (4) assess neurobehavioral safety using automated locomotor tracking [23, 27, 29], and (5) establish no-observed-effect concentrations (NOECs) to define safe concentration ranges for mammalian studies and future clinical translation [2, 10].

MATERIALS AND METHODS

1. Plant materials

Fresh CL rhizomes were collected from certified organic suppliers in Batu, East Java, Indonesia, in December 2022. The plant was authenticated at Universitas Airlangga with a voucher specimen (no. CL-2022-12) deposited. The rhizomes were washed, sliced, dried at 50℃, ground (mesh 80), and stored until extraction.

2. Preparation of NCLEs and SDCLEs

Powdered rhizomes (2.5 kg) were extracted using 25 L of 70% ethanol (1:10 w/v) via continuous percolation at 50℃ for 6 h. For SDCLE preparation, spray-dried lactose was added to the extract (1:9, w/w) before concentration. The mixture was then concentrated under reduced pressure at 45℃ and processed using a spray dryer (inlet 120℃, outlet 80℃, aspirator 35 m3/h, and feed 3 mL/min). For NCLE preparation, the extract was concentrated without the addition of lactose and dried in an oven at 45℃. Both standardized products were stored in light-resistant, airtight containers at 4℃ to ensure stability. Yields were calculated as (final product weight / initial rhizome weight) × 100%. For SDCLE, recovery yield was calculated as (final SDCLE weight / theoretical total solids) × 100%.

3. Curcuminoid quantification by high-performance thin-layer chromatography

1) Standard preparation

Five-point calibration curves were prepared for curcumin (500.0-1,000.0 ng/spot), DMC (1,000.0-2,000.0 ng/spot), and BDMC (1,500.0-3,000.0 ng/spot) in ethanol pro-analysis applied per spot. SDCLE (16.0 mg/mL) and NCLE (1.6 mg/mL) samples were sonicated in ethanol pro-analysis for 15 min and filtered through a 0.45 µm filter.

2) High-performance thin-layer chromatography analysis

Quantitative high-performance thin-layer chromatography (HP-TLC) analysis was performed on silica gel 60F254 plates using toluene:acetic acid (4:1, v/v) as the mobile phase. NCLE (1.0 µL) and SDCLE (10.0 µL) samples were applied using the CAMAG® Automatic TLC Sampler 4, and elution was performed using the CAMAG® Automatic Developing Chamber 2 (ADC 2). The plates were scanned at 254 and 365 nm using a CAMAG® TLC Scanner 4 densitometer and a CAMAG® TLC Visualizer 2 image profiler, and curcuminoids were identified based on the Rf values and ultraviolet (UV) spectra. The peak areas were measured using the VisionCats software. Validation was performed in accordance with the International Council for Harmonisation (ICH) guidelines for pharmaceuticals for human use.

4. Solubility test

Solubility classification followed the United States Pharmacopeia (USP) criteria based on solvent-to-solute ratios [30]. The solubilities of the SDCLE and NCLE were evaluated using a modified shake-flask method. Both formulations were prepared with equivalent extract content (10% w/w NCLE) to enable direct comparison. Samples (250.0 mg) were dispersed in varying volumes of distilled water (1:5 to 1:30) to determine the minimum volume required for complete dissolution. All tests were performed in triplicate. The mixtures were sonicated (2 × 5 min), centrifuged at 3,000 rpm for 1 min, and the supernatants were collected. Dissolved solids in the supernatants were quantified using a moisture analyzer and expressed as a percentage of the initial dry weight. The solubility limit was defined as the lowest volume at which complete dissolution occurred without precipitation. Results are expressed as the mean ± standard deviation (SD).

5. Experimental animals

Wild-type adult zebrafish (Danio rerio; 120 days post-fertilization) were obtained from the NaturMeds Laboratory, Universiti Putra Malaysia. Fish were housed in a recirculating aquaculture system under standardized conditions (28 ± 1℃; pH 7.0-7.5; dissolved oxygen > 6 mg/L; 14:10 h light–dark cycle) and were fed a commercial diet twice daily. Water quality parameters (ammonia, nitrite, nitrate, and hardness) were monitored weekly.

6. Acute toxicity test

The acute toxicity study was conducted in accordance with the OECD Test Guideline 203, with minor modifications. After 14 days of acclimatization, 120 adult zebrafish were randomly allocated to treatment and control groups (10 fish per 1 L tank, three replicates per concentration). For SDCLE, preliminary range-finding tests (50-2,000 mg/L) guided the selection of definitive test concentrations of 100, 200, 300, 400, and 500 mg/L. For NCLE, preliminary range-finding tests (5-200 mg/L) were conducted, and definitive concentrations were set at 10% of the SDCLE doses (10, 20, 30, 40, and 50 mg/L). Fish were not fed during the 96 h exposure period. Control groups received dechlorinated tap water without samples. Fish were monitored for mortality, abnormal behavior, and visible changes throughout the exposure period.

7. LC50 determination

Mortality was recorded after 24, 48, 72, and 96 h of exposure. Fish were considered dead when opercular movement had ceased, and no response was observed to gentle prodding. Median lethal concentration (LC50) values with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using probit analysis of the relationship between the percentage mortality and log-transformed concentrations. The NOEC and lowest-observed-effect concentration (LOEC) values were derived from probit regression curves, with the NOEC defined as the highest concentration with no statistically significant increase in mortality compared to controls, and the LOEC defined as the lowest concentration at which a statistically significant increase in mortality was detected.

8. Behavioral analysis

Fish behavior was recorded at 24, 48, 72, and 96 h post-exposure using a digital camera positioned above the observation tank. After a 2 min acclimatization period, each fish was recorded for 5 min under standard lighting (1,000 lx). Locomotor activity (total distance traveled, mean velocity, activity duration, and movement categories) was quantified using EthoVision XT 15. Trajectory plots were generated to visualize swimming patterns.

9. Statistical analysis

Data are presented as the mean ± SD. Normality was assessed using the Shapiro–Wilk test. LC50 values were obtained using probit regression. Behavioral data were analyzed by one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) with Dunnett’s post hoc test, and time-course data were analyzed by two-way repeated-measures ANOVA. All analyses were performed using GraphPad Prism v9.0, with p-value < 0.05 considered statistically significant.

10. Ethical approval

All experimental procedures were approved by the Animal Care and Use Committee (ACUC) of Universitas Airlangga (approval number: 2.KEH.135.08.2025) and the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) of Universiti Putra Malaysia (approval No.: UPM/IACUC/aUP-R026/2021). Animal welfare was ensured by adherence to humane endpoints and international guidelines.

RESULTS

1. SDCLE preparation

The NCLE yield was 12.83% (w/w) based on the dry weight of the starting rhizomes, which yielded a semisolid extract (Table 1). SDCLE was produced as a free-flowing powder with a 64.30% recovery yield, calculated relative to the theoretical total solids (NCLE and lactose, 1:9 ratio). The final SDCLE contained 10% (w/w) NCLE, consistent with the theoretical 1:9 ratio.

Table 1.

Recovery yield

Formulation Starting material Recovery yield Physical form Composition
NCLE Rhizome Powder 12.83% Viscous Resin 100% Extract
SDCLE NCLE : Lactose (1:9) 64.30% Free-flowing Powder 10% Extract

2. HP-TLC analysis of curcuminoid standards, NCLE and SDCLE

The HP-TLC chromatographic profile exhibited distinct fluorescent bands for curcumin, DMC, and BDMC under UV light at 366 nm. The Rf values for both NCLE and SDCLE matched those of the analytical standards, with overlapping peaks indicating consistent relative proportions between the formulations. No degradation peaks were observed (Fig. 1).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

TLC profiles of curcuminoids, native Curcuma longa L. extract (NCLE), and spray-dried Curcuma longa L. extract (SDCLE).

Curcuminoid quantification by HP-TLC, as summarized in Table 2, established the chemical stability and precision of the spray-drying process. The results demonstrated that the SDCLE formulation achieved proportional mass recovery of the active constituents, yielding curcumin, DMC, and BDMC concentrations corresponding to a precise 10% (w/w) loading relative to the NCLE. The robustness of the analytical method was confirmed by high peak-purity indices (> 0.995) and correlation coefficients for peak identity (> 0.989). Furthermore, the exceptional linearity of the calibration curves (r > 0.99) validated the standardization of the analytical method.

Table 2.

Curcuminoid content in NCLE and SDCLE as determined by HP-TLC

Formulation Analyte Correlation coefficient
(peak identity)
Peak purity r Calibration curve Content
(mg/g ± SD), n = 3

r (s,m) r (m,e)
SDCLE Curcumin 0.989783 0.999855 0.997864 0.9981 y = 0.0000259x + 0.00319 0.148 ± 0.02
DMC 0.995723 0.999758 0.998908 0.9982 y = 0.0000209x + 0.00222 0.067 ± 0.01
BDMC 0.996858 0.999405 0.995862 0.9993 y = 0.000162x + 0.00344 0.066 ± 0.01
NCLE Curcumin 0.991205 0.999842 0.998012 0.9983 y = 0.0000262x + 0.00324 1.46 ± 0.03
DMC 0.996218 0.999763 0.998874 0.9985 y = 0.0000211x + 0.00215 0.70 ± 0.02
BDMC 0.997041 0.999398 0.996045 0.9991 y = 0.0000160x + 0.00338 0.64 ± 0.01

SD, standard deviation.

3. Solubility test

Table 3 indicates that neither formulation fulfills the USP criteria for being “freely soluble” or “soluble” at lower solvent-to-sample ratios, as the dissolved fractions remain significantly below 100%. At the 1:5 and 1:10 ratios, the SDCLE achieved solubility values of only 65.80% ± 0.66 and 72.20% ± 0.44, respectively. Although these values are higher than those of the NCLE (28.92% ± 1.44 and 37.39% ± 1.02), these values confirm the presence of substantial undissolved residue. Only at the maximum dilution of 1:30 did SDCLE approach the 100% threshold required for classification as “soluble,” reaching 91.30% ± 1.08, whereas the raw NCLE remained “poorly soluble” at 55.78% ± 0.39.

Table 3.

Solubility NCLE vs. SDCLE

Category Ratio Water : sampel (v/w) NCLE SDCLE
Freely soluble 1:1-10 g/L 1:5 28.92% ± 1.44 65.80% ± 0.66
1:10 37.39% ± 1.02 72.20% ± 0.44
Soluble 1:10-30 g/L 1:15 40.75% ± 0.46 81.10% ± 1.55
1:20 48.68% ± 0.39 86.60% ± 1.38
1:25 53.34% ± 0.23 88% ± 1.04
1:30 55.78% ± 0.39 91.30% ± 1.08

n = 3. SDCLE, spray-dried Curcuma longa extract.

Visual examination showed that the NCLE formed sediment after centrifugation (Fig. 2), indicating incomplete dissolution. SDL remained clear and free of sediment throughout testing. SDCLE yielded a clear, homogeneous solution with surface foam that remained stable over the entire observation period, demonstrating complete dissolution with no visible precipitation.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Comparative solubility (1:30) of NCLE, SDL, and SDCLE.

4. Survival rate of adult zebrafish

Preliminary range-finding studies revealed that the NCLE was substantially more toxic than the SDCLE. Although the initial study design proposed testing NCLE at 10% of the SDCLE concentrations (10, 20, 30, 40, and 50 mg/L) to maintain proportional curcuminoid exposure, preliminary data showed 100% mortality at concentrations above 30 mg/L within 48 h. To adequately characterize the dose–response relationship and establish behaviorally relevant safety thresholds, the definitive NCLE concentrations were adjusted to 10, 15, 20, 25, and 30 mg/L, providing finer resolution within the critical toxicity range.

The acute toxicity profiles of the SDCLE and NCLE showed significant differences in dose-dependent mortality over the 96-hour exposure period (Fig. 3). In contrast, the NCLE exhibited high toxicity, with 100% mortality at concentrations as low as 25-30 mg/L (Fig. 3B); the SDCLE maintained a survival rate of approximately 20% even at a significantly higher concentration of 400 mg/L (Fig. 3A).

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Zebrafish survival rates after acute exposure to SDCLE (A) and NCLE (B).

5. LC50 of SDCLE

The visual and statistical data in Fig. 4 provide a comparative assessment of the acute toxicity profiles of both formulations. Fig. 4A shows the physical appearance of the experimental media, with a sequence of transparent tanks exhibiting increasing yellow turbidity, corresponding to the concentration gradient from 0 to 2,500 mg/L. Fig. 4B presents lateral morphological views of adult zebrafish, documenting physical integrity, fin structure, and scale pigmentation across the specified dosage range.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Visual and statistical analyses of acute toxicity. (A) Experimental setup with SDCLE at various concentrations. (B) Zebrafish with concentration-dependent yellow pigmentation. (C) Probit-analysis mortality curves for SDCLE across 24-96 hours. (D) Probit analysis mortality curves for NCLE across 24-96 hours.

Concentration-dependent yellow pigmentation of the fish body and scales was observed as a visible indicator of curcuminoid accumulation in tissues. During preliminary range-finding tests at 2,000 mg/L, pigmentation appeared within 15 min of exposure. In contrast, at the definitive test concentration of 300 mg/L, yellow pigmentation became visually apparent after 72 h, suggesting dose-dependent tissue accumulation kinetics.

The statistical relationship between log concentration and mortality rate is depicted using probit analysis in Fig. 4C and Fig. 4D. In Fig. 4C, the SDCLE curves are shifted toward the higher end of the log concentration axis for the 24-, 48-, 72-, and 96-hour intervals. In contrast, the NCLE curves in Fig. 4D appear at lower log concentrations and exhibit a steeper trajectory toward maximum mortality over the observation period.

The SDCLE formulation demonstrated LC50 values that decreased from 469.96 mg/L at 24 hours to 288.13 mg/L at 96 hours, with corresponding NOEC values declining from 234.98 mg/L to 144.07 mg/L. Over the same temporal intervals, the LOEC for the SDCLE ranged from 305.47 to 187.28 mg/L. In contrast, the NCLE formulation yielded substantially lower values, with the LC50 value decreasing from 28.59 mg/L at 24 h to 22.11 mg/L at 96 h. The NOEC and LOEC for the NCLE followed a similar downward trend, with values of 11.05 mg/L and 14.36 mg/L, respectively, at the final 96-hour measurement; calibration curves for both formulations were linear.

Supplementary testing of spray-dried lactose alone yielded an LC50 value of 123,787.05 mg/L (95% CI: 92,829.46-155,701.33) at 96 hours, confirming the negligible toxicity of the carrier matrix. This value was approximately 430-fold higher than that of the SDCLE (288.13 mg/L), indicating that the observed toxicity was attributable to the extract rather than the excipient.

6. Locomotor behavior of zebrafish

The behavioral parameters showed concentration-dependent changes (Fig. 5). For the SDCLE, the inactivity duration at 96 h increased progressively from 5 s in the controls to 32 s at 300 mg/L (Fig. 5A), representing a six-fold increase. Total distance traveled decreased from 240 cm in the control group to 155 cm at 300 mg/L (Fig. 5B), corresponding to a 35% reduction in swimming activity. Notably, similar patterns were observed at lower concentrations for the NCLE (Fig. 5C, D), with behavioral changes observable at 15 mg/L, a lower threshold than for the SDCLE, indicating an earlier onset of neurobehavioral effects.

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Effects of NCLE and SDCLE on zebrafish activity parameters. (A) Inactivity duration for SDCLE groups. (B) Total distance traveled for SDCLE groups. (C) Inactivity duration for NCLE groups. (D) Total distance traveled for NCLE groups. Data are presented as the mean ± standard deviation (SD).

Trajectory mapping showed that control fish exhibited extensive red zones (high activity) distributed throughout the arena (Fig. 6). At 300 mg/L, the trajectories of the SDCLE group shifted predominantly to green zones (low activity) and black zones (inactivity), with swimming paths restricted to approximately 40% of the arena area. This spatial restriction corresponded with the quantitative data, which showed a six-fold increase in inactivity and a 35% decrease in swimming distance at 300 mg/L. Both concentration- and time-dependent patterns were evident, with effects intensifying from 24 to 96 h across all tested concentrations.

Figure 6.

Figure 6

Effect of SDCLE concentration on zebrafish trajectory distance. Representative swimming paths for the transition from high locomotor activity (red) to low locomotor activity (green) and inactivity (black) as the concentration increased from 0 to 300 mg/L. Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05.

DISCUSSION

The use of CLE for pharmacopuncture is limited by the associated poor aqueous solubility and the lack of safety data for whole-extract injectable formulations [4, 9, 14]. Previous research has focused exclusively on isolated curcumin; however, this study evaluated SDCLEs combined with microencapsulation agents [11, 14]. Spray drying resolves the reconstitution barrier while maintaining a safety profile compatible with neurobehavioral thresholds in zebrafish models [9, 22, 25]. To our knowledge, this integrated pharmaceutical and toxicological characterization provides the first comprehensive safety evaluation of SDCLE, establishing a regulatory foundation for pharmacopuncture dose selection [2, 10].

Spray-drying technology preserved curcuminoid integrity, as demonstrated by HP-TLC analysis (Fig. 1, Table 2). SDCLE (0.148 ± 0.02 mg/g) and NCLE (1.46 ± 0.03 mg/g) exhibited proportional curcuminoid concentrations at a 1:10 ratio, with curcumin remaining the predominant constituent. Method validation showed linearity (r > 0.99) and peak purity (> 0.995), with no degradation peaks, confirming that the lactose matrix did not interfere with curcuminoid stability [31]. Chromatographic fingerprinting enables batch-to-batch consistency required for regulatory compliance [4, 20, 31]. This technology produces stable powders that are compatible with terminal sterilization and reconstitution in variable volumes for clinical use [5, 32, 33]. The 64.30% recovery yield maintained a consistent active extract content (10% w/w) within pharmaceutical standards (Table 1) [34], supporting GMP-compliant production of sterile injectables [4, 35].

Spray-drying technology overcomes the solubility barrier by converting CLE from a semisolid extract (NCLE) into a free-flowing powder (SDCLE). Lactose microencapsulation (1:9 w/w) produced microparticles with enhanced aqueous dispersion. SDCLE achieved 91.30% dissolution at a 1:30 dilution compared with 55.78% for NCLE, representing a 63.68% increase in solubility. Although most of the dissolved mass originated from the lactose matrix rather than the extract, the formulation enabled clear reconstitution without precipitation, as required for injection (Table 3, Fig. 2). Visual examination confirmed this improvement: SDCLE solutions remained clear with surface foam, whereas NCLE preparations showed heavy sedimentation. This approach eliminates the need for ethanol-based vehicles, which can cause tissue necrosis at acupoint sites [1, 5, 32].

Acute toxicity assessment showed concentration- and time-dependent responses over 96 h (Table 4, Fig. 3). The LC50 values for SDCLE decreased from 469.96 mg/L at 24 h to 288.13 mg/L at 96 h, representing a 38.70% reduction and indicating cumulative toxicity. The 96-hour LC50 value of 288.13 mg/L classifies the SDCLE as moderately toxic according to the OECD criteria [27, 36]. SDCLE exhibited lower toxicity than NCLE (96-hour LC₅₀ = 22.11 mg/L), whereas spray-dried lactose demonstrated negligible toxicity (LC50 = 123,787.05 mg/L), confirming an associated inertness. Probit regression analysis showed steep dose–response curves with clear mortality thresholds (Fig. 4C, D): SDCLE maintained > 95% survival at concentrations ≤ 200 mg/L, whereas concentrations ≥ 300 mg/L produced progressively increasing mortality, reaching 80% by 96 h. Concentration-dependent yellow pigmentation appeared within 15 min at 2,000 mg/L but required 72 h at 300 mg/L, likely reflecting curcuminoid tissue accumulation and serving as an early warning indicator of systemic exposure [25, 27].

Table 4.

Comparative acute toxicity parameters (LC50, NOEC, and LOEC) of SDCLE and NCLE in adult zebrafish

Formulation Time (hour) LC50 (mg/L) Calibration curve 95% CI NOEC (mg/L) LOEC (mg/L)
SDCLE 24 469.96 y = 13.594x – 31.324 352.47-587.45 234.98 305.47
48 387.61 y = 9.7740x – 20.299 290.71-484.51 193.81 252.95
72 371.12 y = 9.7633x – 20.087 278.34-463.90 185.56 241.23
96 288.13 y = 13.636x – 28.539 216.10-360.16 144.07 187.28
NCLE 24 28.59 y = 14.765x – 16.502 21.44-35.73 14.29 18.58
48 25.65 y = 13.960x – 14.671 19.23-32.06 12.82 16.66
72 23.75 y = 15.733x – 16.644 17.81-29.68 11.87 15.43
96 22.11 y = 17.378x – 18.367 16.58-27.63 11.05 14.36

The toxicity profile reflects the complexity of herbal extracts, where biological effects result from synergistic or antagonistic interactions among curcuminoids, turmerones, polysaccharides, and minor alkaloids [14, 20]. Curcumin exhibits dose-dependent biphasic behavior; curcumin is cytoprotective at low concentrations through antioxidant mechanisms but becomes cytotoxic at higher concentrations via pro-oxidant activity and mitochondrial dysfunction [14]. The higher LC50 of SDCLE compared to NCLE (288.13 vs. 22.11 mg/L) may reflect altered bioavailability arising from the lactose matrix, which can affect absorption and tissue distribution. This complexity underscores the need to evaluate whole-extract formulations rather than isolated compounds, as pharmacopuncture products encompass the entire phytochemical spectrum and exhibit matrix-mediated release characteristics [4, 20, 31].

Translating mortality data into regulatory safety thresholds required determining the NOEC and LOEC values (Table 4). Probit analysis yielded NOEC values of 144.07 mg/L for SDCLE and 11.05 mg/L for NCLE at 96 h, representing the highest concentrations at which no statistically significant mortality was observed. The corresponding LOEC values were 187.28 mg/L for SDCLE and 14.36 mg/L for NCLE, indicating the lowest concentrations at which significant mortality was observed. Behavioral analysis provides additional safety insights beyond those based solely on mortality thresholds. The narrow margin between the SDCLE (ratio of 0.50) indicates a limited safety buffer [25], requiring strict concentration controls, as concentrations above the NOEC approach lethal thresholds. These mortality-based benchmarks provide the foundation for interspecies extrapolation and for calculating human doses with appropriate safety factors for acupoint injection [3, 9, 22].

Neurobehavioral analysis showed that locomotor deficits emerged at sublethal concentrations, demonstrating that behavioral endpoints detect toxicity more sensitively than mortality endpoint measurements (Figs. 5, 6). The swimming parameters showed concentration- and time-dependent impairments in both formulations. At 96 h, fish exposed to 300 mg/L SDCLE showed a 35% reduction in distance traveled (155 cm vs. 240 cm in controls) and a six-fold increase in inactivity (32 s vs. 5 s) [29, 32]. The NCLE produced similar patterns at lower extract concentrations. Trajectory mapping showed that control fish exhibited extensive high-activity zones (red trajectories) (Fig. 6), whereas fish exposed to 300 mg/L displayed restricted swimming paths with predominantly low-activity (green) and inactive (black) zones. Behavioral suppression at 200-300 mg/L, where survival exceeded 80% at 48 h, indicates that neurobehavioral endpoints can detect toxicity before lethality [25, 26].

Behavioral assay sensitivity enables refinement beyond traditional mortality metrics. The integration of locomotor data with survival curves established 200 mg/L as a critical safety threshold, at which complete survival and unimpaired swimming activity were maintained. This finding has direct pharmacopuncture safety implications: acupoints are anatomically proximal to peripheral nerves, and the injected solutions are hypothesized to flow along meridians that follow neurovascular pathways [37]. Given this proximity and the potential for direct neurotoxic exposure, concentrations exceeding 200 mg/L pose an unacceptable risk. Although the mortality-based NOEC (144.07 mg/L) defines the primary regulatory threshold, behavioral data at 200 mg/L provide an additional safety margin for neurotoxicity assessment in this anatomically sensitive application.

The zebrafish model was validated for toxicological assessment in accordance with OECD Test Guideline 203 [23, 36]. Zebrafish share approximately 70% genomic homology with mammals and possess conserved neurotransmitter systems and locomotor circuits, enabling translational prediction of neurotoxic effects and facilitating high-throughput screening [24, 25]. However, limitations remain: waterborne exposure differs fundamentally from direct tissue injection in absorption kinetics and local tissue response, and the model cannot replicate acupoint-specific injection dynamics, immune-mediated responses, or the pharmacokinetic profiles associated with parenteral depot formation [25]. These limitations require bridging studies in mammalian models before clinical translation [3, 9, 25].

Translating zebrafish data into clinical applications requires conservative extrapolation, accounting for safety factors to account for interspecies and route-of-administration differences. Based on the mortality-derived NOEC of 144.07 mg/L and the behavioral safety threshold of 200 mg/L, combined with typical injection volumes (0.1-0.5 mL per acupoint), the proposed clinical concentration range is 1-10 mg/mL, with a 10-100-fold safety margin [1, 6].

Mammalian bridging studies remain essential for clinical translation [3, 9, 25]. Regulatory advancement requires GMP-compliant manufacturing, validated analytical methods, sterility testing, and batch consistency verification [4, 31, 34]. Meanwhile, clinical trials should adhere to STRICTA and CONSORT guidelines [1, 38, 39]. This framework, which integrates solubility optimization, preclinical safety characterization, and regulatory compliance, positions SDCLE for pharmacopuncture development pending validation in mammalian models.

CONCLUSION

This study established the pharmaceutical feasibility and preliminary safety of SDCLE for use in pharmacopuncture. Spray-drying enhanced aqueous dispersibility by 63.68% while preserving curcuminoid integrity, enabling sterile reconstitution for injection. Toxicological characterization identified a 96-hour LC50 of 288.13 mg/L and a mortality-based NOEC of 144.07 mg/L, with behavioral endpoints providing more sensitive detection of neurotoxicity than lethality at sublethal concentrations. The clinical concentration range of 1-10 mg/mL incorporates appropriate safety margins. Zebrafish screening provides foundational insights, while mammalian bridging studies are essential to confirm tissue tolerance and pharmacokinetic profiles. Nonetheless, with validated analytical methods and GMP-compliant manufacturing, SDCLE represents a viable pharmacopuncture formulation that requires mammalian validation before clinical implementation.

Footnotes

DECLARATION OF AI ASSISTANCE

The authors acknowledge the use of artificial intelligence (AI)–based tools to support language refinement, grammar checking, and paraphrasing during the manuscript preparation. The AI tools did not contribute to the research design, data collection, data analysis or interpretation of the results. The authors take full responsibility for the content, originality, and integrity of this manuscript.

AUTHORS’ CONTRIBUTIONS

The authors confirm contribution to the paper as follows: study conception and design: I.K., I.S.S.; data collection: S.R.; analysis and interpretation of results: S.R., D.A.P., D.I.; draft manuscript preparation: S.R., I.K., I.S.S., Admin; technical or material support: A.P.F., R.R.R., M.S.A.B., M.A.N., C.V.P.P. All authors reviewed the results and approved the final manuscript.

CONFLICTS OF INTEREST

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

FUNDING

The authors would like to thank the support of a Research Collaboration Under the Scheme of SATU Joint Research (1400/UN3. LMG/L/PT.01.02/2023).

REFERENCES

  • 1.Park J, Lee H, Shin BC, Lee MS, Kim B, Kim JI. Pharmacopuncture in Korea: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2016;2016:4683121. doi: 10.1155/2016/4683121. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Kim G, Kim D, Moon H, Yoon DE, Lee S, Ko SJ, et al. Acupuncture and acupoints for low back pain: systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Chin Med. 2023;51(2):223–47. doi: 10.1142/S0192415X23500131. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Lee YJ, Shin JS, Lee J, Kim MR, Park KB, Lee HD, et al. Usage report of pharmacopuncture in musculoskeletal patients visiting Korean medicine hospitals and clinics in Korea. BMC Complement Altern Med. 2016;16(1):292. doi: 10.1186/s12906-016-1288-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Sung SH, Shin BC, Park MJ, Kim KH, Kim JW, Ryu JY, et al. Current status of management on pharmacopuncture in Korea through introduction of an accreditation system. J Pharmacopuncture. 2019;22(2):75–82. doi: 10.3831/KPI.2019.22.009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Wang B, Xiang J, He B, Tan S, Zhou W. Enhancing bioavailability of natural extracts for nutritional applications through dry powder inhalers (DPI) spray drying: technological advancements and future directions. Front Nutr. 2023;10:1190912. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2023.1190912. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Sha T, Gao LL, Zhang CH, Zheng JG, Meng ZH. An update on acupuncture point injection. QJM. 2016;109(10):639–41. doi: 10.1093/qjmed/hcw055. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Li C, Naeem A, Shen J, Zha W, Zeng Q, Zhang P, et al. Advances in the pharmaceutical research of curcumin for oral administration. Open Chem. 2023;21(1):20230171. doi: 10.1515/chem-2023-0171. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Vinogradova N, Glukhov A, Chaplygin V, Kumar P, Mandzhieva S, Minkina T, et al. The content of heavy metals in medicinal plants in various environmental conditions: a review. Horticulturae. 2023;9(2):239. doi: 10.3390/horticulturae9020239. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Safonov AA, Karpenko YV, Knysh YH. A study of acute toxicity of newly synthesized compound on adult hydrobiont Danio rerio. Curr Issues Pharm Med Sci Pract. 2021;14(1):68–72. doi: 10.14739/2409-2932.2021.1.226789. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Park JE, Kim KH, Kang S, Lee EK, Kim J, Jang B, et al. Usage status and satisfaction with pharmacopuncture in Korea: a survey among Korean medicine doctors. Eur J Integr Med. 2019;27:121–30. doi: 10.1016/j.eujim.2019.03.001. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Fuloria S, Mehta J, Chandel A, Sekar M, Rani NNIM, Begum MY, et al. A comprehensive review on the therapeutic potential of Curcuma longa Linn. in relation to its major active constituent curcumin. Front Pharmacol. 2022;13:820806. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2022.820806. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Chaudhary S, Chaudhary G, Bana S, Singh J, Dubey S, Sharma L. Pharmacological facet of Curcuma longa: a review. Int J Pharm Sci Rev Res. 2022;76(1):119–25. doi: 10.47583/ijpsrr.2022.v76i01.022. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Khan AI, Aktar F, Chowdhury JA, Chowdhury AA, Kabir S, Amran MS. A comprehensive study on biology, chemistry and pharmacology of Curcuma longa L.: a review. J Bio Sci. 2024;31(2):67–85. doi: 10.3329/jbs.v31i2.74148. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Hassanzadeh K, Buccarello L, Dragotto J, Mohammadi A, Corbo M, Feligioni M. Obstacles against the marketing of curcumin as a drug. Int J Mol Sci. 2020;21(18):6619. doi: 10.3390/ijms21186619. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Hewlings SJ, Kalman DS. Curcumin: a review of its effects on human health. Foods. 2017;6(10):92. doi: 10.3390/foods6100092. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Chen L, Zhao F, Li W, Chen Z, Pan J, Xiong D, et al. Evaluation of a multiple and global analytical indicator of batch consistency: traditional Chinese medicine injection as a case study. RSC Adv. 2020;10(17):10338–51. doi: 10.1039/C9RA10065B. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Srivastava BBL, Ripanda AS, Mwanga HM. Ethnomedicinal, phytochemistry and antiviral potential of turmeric (Curcuma longa) Compounds. 2022;2(3):200–21. doi: 10.3390/compounds2030017. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.de Carvalho Rocha Koga R, Custodio de Souza G, Tavares de Lima Teixeira AV, Ferreira AM, Sánchez-Ortiz BL, Silva Abreu L, et al. Hydroethanolic extracts from Bauhinia guianensis: a study on acute toxicity in Zebrafish embryos and adults. Pharm Biol. 2024;62(1):577–91. doi: 10.1080/13880209.2024.2374806. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Abdulazeez I, Ismail IS, Mohd Faudzi SM, Christianus A, Chong SG. Study on the acute toxicity of sodium taurocholate via zebrafish mortality, behavioral response, and NMR-metabolomics analysis. Drug Chem Toxicol. 2024;47(1):115–30. doi: 10.1080/01480545.2023.2242005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Li H, Wang S, Yue Z, Ren X, Xia J. Traditional Chinese herbal injection: current status and future perspectives. Fitoterapia. 2018;129:249–56. doi: 10.1016/j.fitote.2018.07.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Lee KH, Cho YY, Kim S, Sun SH. History of research on pharmacopuncture in Korea. J Pharmacopuncture. 2016;19(2):101–8. doi: 10.3831/KPI.2016.19.010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), author OECD guidelines for the testing of chemicals, section 2 Test No. 203: fish, acute toxicity test. OECD; Paris: 2025. p. 24. [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Raduan SZ, Ahmed QU, Kasmuri AR, Rusmili MRA, Sulaiman WAW, Shaikh MF, et al. Neurotoxicity of aluminium chloride and okadaic acid in zebrafish: insights into Alzheimer's disease models through anxiety and locomotion testing, and acute toxicity assessment with Litsea garciae bark's methanolic extract. J King Saud Univ Sci. 2023;35(7):102807. doi: 10.1016/j.jksus.2023.102807. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Chakraborty C, Sharma AR, Sharma G, Lee SS. Zebrafish: a complete animal model to enumerate the nanoparticle toxicity. J Nanobiotechnology. 2016;14(1):65. doi: 10.1186/s12951-016-0217-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Verma SK, Nandi A, Sinha A, Patel P, Mohanty S, Jha E, et al. The posterity of Zebrafish in paradigm of in vivo molecular toxicological profiling. Biomed Pharmacother. 2024;171:116160. doi: 10.1016/j.biopha.2024.116160. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Green AJ, Truong L, Thunga P, Leong C, Hancock M, Tanguay RL, et al. Deep autoencoder-based behavioral pattern recognition outperforms standard statistical methods in high-dimensional zebrafish studies. PLoS Comput Biol. 2024;20(9):e1012423. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1012423. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Faria M, Ziv T, Gómez-Canela C, Ben-Lulu S, Prats E, Novoa-Luna KA, et al. Acrylamide acute neurotoxicity in adult zebrafish. Sci Rep. 2018;8(1):7918. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-26343-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Alafiatayo AA, Lai KS, Syahida A, Mahmood M, Shaharuddin NA. Phytochemical evaluation, embryotoxicity, and teratogenic effects of Curcuma longa extract on zebrafish (Danio rerio) Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2019;2019:3807207. doi: 10.1155/2019/3807207. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Kushalan S, D'Souza LC, Aloysius K, Sharma A, Hegde S. Toxicity assessment of Curculigo orchioides leaf extract using drosophila melanogaster: a preliminary study. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022;19(22):15218. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192215218. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.European Parliament, author. Annex Part A : Methods for the Determination of Physicochemical Properties [Internet] European Parliament; Bruxelles: 2007. [cited 2025 Sep 22]. Available from: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/comitologie/droit_de_reglementation_avec_controle/2007/COM-AC_DRC(2007)CMT-2007-2696-4_EN.pdf . [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Pudziuvelyte L, Marksa M, Jakstas V, Ivanauskas L, Kopustinskiene DM, Bernatoniene J. Microencapsulation of Elsholtzia ciliata herb ethanolic extract by spray-drying: impact of resistant-maltodextrin complemented with sodium caseinate, skim milk, and beta-cyclodextrin on the quality of spray-dried powders. Molecules. 2019;24(8):1461. doi: 10.3390/molecules24081461. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Kusumawati I. In: Phytopharmaceuticals: Potential Therapeutic Applications. Chauhan DN, Shah K, editors. Scrivener Publishing; Beverly (MA): 2021. A great challenge on the reproducibility of therapeutic results of phytopharmaceuticals. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Del Gaudio P, Sansone F, Mencherini T, De Cicco F, Russo P, Aquino RP. Nanospray drying as a novel tool to improve technological properties of soy isoflavone extracts. Planta Med. 2017;83(5):426–33. doi: 10.1055/s-0042-110179. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Thampi AS, Kumar SR, Gowtham Sanjai S, Ramaswamy P. Application of spray drying process to convert beneficial compounds extracted from plants into free-flowing powder. IOP Conf Ser Mater Sci Eng. 2020;988:012052. doi: 10.1088/1757-899X/988/1/012052. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Mazár J, Albert K, Kovács Z, Koris A, Nath A, Bánvölgyi S. Advances in spray-drying and freeze-drying technologies for the microencapsulation of instant tea and herbal powders: the role of wall materials. Foods. 2025;14(3):486. doi: 10.3390/foods14030486. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), author Test No. 203: fish, acute toxicity test. OECD; Paris: 2019. p. 24. [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Kim MR, Lee SM, Lee YJ, Ha IH. Clinical research on pharmacopuncture in Korea: a scoping review. Perspect Integr Med. 2023;2(1):8–23. doi: 10.56986/pim.2023.02.003. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Jeong S, Son C, Kim H, Yang G, Chu H, Leem J. Proposal of a case reporting draft guideline for pharmacopuncture: literature review of pharmacopuncture case reports. Perspect Integr Med. 2023;2(1):24–35. doi: 10.56986/pim.2023.02.004. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Diskin MG, Kenny DA. Optimising reproductive performance of beef cows and replacement heifers. Animal. 2014;8 Suppl 1:27–39. doi: 10.1017/S175173111400086X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Pharmacopuncture are provided here courtesy of Korean Pharmacopuncture Institute

RESOURCES