Abstract
Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is characterized by progressive neurodegeneration driven by tau and amyloid-β (Aβ) pathology, although the underlying molecular mechanisms remain incompletely understood. Emerging evidence implicates altered DNA methylation (DNAm) in AD but comprehensive analyses in experimental models are limited. Here, we profile DNAm dynamics in two widely used transgenic mouse models of tau (rTg4510) and Aβ (J20) neuropathology, focusing on the entorhinal cortex and hippocampus. Using reduced representation bisulfite sequencing (RRBS) and methylation arrays across multiple disease stages, we identified widespread pathology-associated DNAm alterations in both models. Tau pathology in rTg4510 mice was associated with extensive DNAm remodeling at genes involved in neuronal plasticity, apoptosis, and lipid metabolism, including Dcaf5, Creb3l4, and As3mt. In contrast, J20 mice exhibited more modest changes, primarily at immune-related loci such as Grk2, Ncam2, and Prmt8. Tau-associated DNAm changes were more consistent across brain areas than those associated with Aβ pathology. Comparison with human AD DNAm datasets revealed overlapping DNAm differences, including hypermethylation at Ank1 and Prdm16 in rTg4510 mice. These findings provide robust evidence for early, pathology-associated epigenetic alterations in AD and highlight the utility of epigenomic profiling in transgenic models for identifying novel targets for early intervention in AD.
Subject terms: Diseases, Genetics, Molecular biology, Neurology, Neuroscience
Introduction
Alzheimer’s disease (AD) – the most common type of dementia – is a chronic neurodegenerative disorder characterized by progressive memory deterioration, and cognitive and functional decline1. These symptoms result from progressive neuronal death synaptic loss and brain atrophy 2 associated with two core neuropathological processes1: the formation of neurofibrillary tangles (NFTs) as a result of intracellular aggregation of hyperphosphorylated tau protein, and the development of amyloid plaques, which are extracellular deposits composed mainly of amyloid-β (Aβ) protein2. While certain brain regions are relatively resistant to AD pathology, the hippocampus and entorhinal cortex – both involved in memory formation and recall – are particularly affected during the earliest stages of disease3. Despite significant progress in elucidating genetic risk factors for AD4, the precise molecular mechanisms that initiate and propagate NFT and Aβ pathology remain incompletely understood.
Emerging evidence suggests that epigenetic dysregulation plays a key role in the onset and progression of AD pathology. In particular, alterations in DNA methylation (DNAm) have been reported in postmortem human cortex in AD, implicating changes in the epigenome as a potential contributor to disease etiology and progression5,6. However, interpreting findings from epigenome-wide association studies (EWAS) can be challenging due to confounding influences such as medication exposure and other secondary consequences of advanced disease, which complicate efforts to distinguish causal epigenetic changes from downstream effects of neurodegeneration. Transgenic (TG) rodent models of tau and Aβ pathology have helped identify mechanistic pathways involved in AD7,8. Recent transcriptomic studies in such models have revealed widespread gene expression changes driven by different AD-associated mutations9. To date, however, limited work has been undertaken to characterize epigenomic variation in AD-relevant mouse models10,11, with existing studies focusing on either global shifts in modifications to DNA or histones, or targeting a small number of candidate loci12. A comprehensive characterization of epigenetic alterations in AD-relevant mouse models could provide critical insights into early mechanistic changes that precede overt late stages of disease and may reveal novel targets for therapeutic intervention.
In this study, we profiled DNAm in the entorhinal cortex, a region of the brain critically affected in early AD, using transgenic mouse models of tau and Aβ neuropathology. We profiled tissue at multiple time points from the rTg4510 transgenic model (ages 2, 4, 6, and 8 months) that expresses a human mutant form of the microtubule-associated protein tau (MAPT) gene13, and the J20 transgenic model (ages 6, 8, 10, and 12 months) that carries familial AD mutations in the amyloid precursor protein (APP) gene14. DNAm changes were quantified using two methodological approaches – reduced representation bisulfite sequencing (RRBS) and the Illumina mammalian methylation array15 – with specific differences validated using bisulfite pyrosequencing. We subsequently compared the DNAm changes identified in the entorhinal cortex with DNAm profiles in the hippocampus, another region of the brain affected in AD pathogenesis. Finally, we compared DNAm signatures identified in both models with data from a recent EWAS meta-analysis of postmortem human AD cortical tissue from >2000 donors16. Our findings provide further evidence for known responses to AD neuropathology and reveal novel genomic pathways associated with the accumulation of tau and Aβ.
Results
Profiling DNA methylation in mouse models of tau and Aβ neuropathology: experimental overview
We have previously described transcriptional changes in the entorhinal cortex and hippocampus associated with AD pathology in transgenic mice carrying human mutations in MAPT (rTg4510) and APP (J20)17. Building on our past work, we aimed to quantify site-specific DNAm changes associated with tau and Aβ neuropathology in the same animals (Fig. 1). To achieve this, we used both highly-parallel reduced representation bisulfite sequencing (RRBS) and the Illumina mammalian methylation array to quantify genome-wide levels of DNAm in entorhinal cortex tissue dissected from rTg4510 TG and wild-type (WT) littermate controls (n = 31 WT, n = 30 TG, across ages 2, 4, 6, and 8 months) and J20 mice (n = 32 WT, n = 31 TG, ages 6, 8, 10, and 12 months) (Fig. 1). Our RRBS experiments yielded a mean of 40.29 M (SD = 6.14 M) and 42.36 M (SD = 7.24 M) sequencing reads per sample in the rTg4510 and J20 models, respectively, with no significant differences in sequencing depth between TG and WT for either model (rTg4510: P = 0.908; J20: P = 0.449, Data S1). Following stringent preprocessing and quality control (see Methods), the final rTg410 entorhinal cortex DNAm dataset included a total of 1,364,030 sites (RRBS = 1,347,524 sites, array = 23,588 sites, overlap = 3451 sites), while the J20 dataset included 1,388,735 sites (RRBS = 1,372,261 sites, array = 23,588 sites, overlap = 3557 sites). As expected, these sites were primarily annotated to promoters given their high CpG content (rTg4510: n = 819,651 (60.8%), J20: n = 854,272 (62.3%), Supplementary Fig. S1). To assess consistency between platforms, we examined overlapping sites between RRBS and the array. Despite representing a small subset of total sites (15% of array sites, 0.26% of RRBS sites), DNAm estimates were highly correlated across technologies (rTg4510: r = 0.93; J20: r = 0.90; both P = 2.2E−16; Supplementary Fig. S2). Our analytical approach focused on two main analyses: (1) identifying group-level DNAm differences between TG and WT mice, and (2) testing associations between DNAm and quantitative measures of tau and Aβ pathology (assessed through immunohistochemistry in the same animals, Fig. 1). We subsequently profiled DNAm in the hippocampal tissue dissected from the same animals using the Illumina mammalian methylation array to compare tau- and Aβ-associated differences across brain regions (Fig. 1).
Fig. 1. Study overview.
To investigate DNA methylation signatures of tau pathology we used the rTg4510 transgenic mouse line which over-expresses the human mutant (P301L) form of the microtubule-associated protein tau (MAPT). To investigate amyloid-β (Aβ) pathology, we used the J20 transgenic mouse line, which expresses a mutant (K670N/M671L and V717F) form of the human amyloid precursor protein (APP). Tissue was collected from transgenic (TG) and wild-type (WT) control mice at four time points. RRBS was used to quantify DNA methylation in the entorhinal cortex from both models. These data were complemented with DNA methylation data generated using the Illumina mammalian methylation array in both the entorhinal cortex and hippocampus from both models. Selected DMPs were validated using bisulfite pyrosequencing. ECX – entorhinal cortex, HIP – hippocampus, RRBS – Reduced representation bisulfite sequencing. This figure was created with BioRender.com released under a Creative Commons Attribution (NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International license).
DNA methylation changes in rTg4510 cortex are annotated to genes regulating neuronal function and apoptosis
To identify differentially methylated positions (DMPs) in the entorhinal cortex associated with the MAPT transgene, we used a beta regression model to detect genotype-associated differences between rTg4510 TG and WT mice amongst sites profiled in the combined RRBS and array dataset (see Methods). In total, we identified 1143 DMPs (false discovery rate (FDR) < 0.05) annotated to 514 genes between groups (Fig. 2A, Data S2), with a significant enrichment of sites being hypermethylated in TG mice relative to WT mice (638 (55.8%) hypermethylated DMPs and 505 (44.2%) hypomethylated DMPs, binomial test: P = 9.29E−5). Several of the top-ranked DMPs between TG and WT mice were annotated to the Mapt gene itself (chr11:104318231, effect size = −1.04, FDR = 3.73E−30, Supplementary Fig. S3, Supplementary Data S2) and a region covering Prnp that encodes prion protein readthrough transcript and prion protein (PrP) (n = 4 CpG sites, chr2:131910162 - chr2:131910201, mean effect size = 1.15, Empirical Brown’s method: P = 7.00E−5), which we validated using bisulfite pyrosequencing (Supplementary Fig. S4). These differences likely reflect the direct consequences of the transgene insertion18 and mirror differential expression of the same genes identified in our previous study9. The list of DMPs also included sites annotated to other genes known to be affected by the CaMKIIα-tTA transgene insertion (including DMPs annotated to Ncapg2 and Ptprn2) and MAPT (including DMPs annotated to Fgf14) transgenes18 (Supplementary Fig. S3).
Fig. 2. Differential DNA methylation in rTg4510 mice.
A Manhattan plot showing transgene-associated differential methylation positions (DMPs) in rTg4510 mice (n = 61, 31 WT, 30 TG). Red dots correspond to sites characterized by a significant (FDR < 0.05 (RRBS P < 4.07E−05, array P < 8.1E−05)) increase in DNA methylation in TG mice compared to controls. Blue dots correspond to sites characterized by a significant decrease in DNA methylation in TG mice. B Shown are the gene tracks and top-ranked differentially methylated sites annotated to (i) Dcaf5 (chr12:80436248, effect size = 0.39, FDR = 1.3E-12), (ii) Arsi (n = 6 CpG sites, chr18:60917760 - chr18:60917679, mean effect size = -1.51), (iii) Creb3l4 (n = 2 CpG sites, chr3:90243866 - chr3:90243888, mean effect size = −2.34), and (iv) As3mt (n = 5 CpG sites, chr19:46730273 - chr19:46730349, mean effect size = 1.48), between WT and rTg4510 TG mice. Black and blue dots refer to WT and TG, respectively, and the blue lines on the tracks refer to the location of DMPs relative to the gene. C Manhattan plot showing DMPs associated with levels of tau measured using immunohistochemistry in rTg4510 TG mice. Red dots correspond to sites characterized by a significant (FDR < 0.05 (RRBS P < 1.94E−04, array P < 4.8E−03)) increase in DNA methylation with increased pathology. Blue dots correspond to sites characterized by a significant decrease in DNA methylation with increased pathology. D Shown are the gene tracks and top-ranked differentially methylated sites annotated to (i) Cisd3 (chr11:97685376, effect size = 0.025, FDR = 7.84E−10; chr11:97685391, effect size = 0.013, FDR = 4.32E−3), (ii) Zfp23 (chr8:87750175, effect size = 0.017, FDR = 7.84E−10) (iii) Adk (chr14:21369243, effect size = 0.016, FDR = 7.19E−9; chr14:21369309, effect size = 0.018, FDR = 2.87E−4), (iv) Insyn2b (chr11:34314785, effect size = 0.015, FDR = 6.65E−8), associated with progressive tau pathology in rTg4510 TG mice. Black and blue dots refer to WT and TG, respectively, and the blue lines on the tracks refer to the location of CpG sites.
Beyond differences at these sites, we found highly significant genotype-associated differences in DNAm at sites and groups of sites annotated to many genes, including Dcaf5 (chr12:80436248, effect size = 0.39, FDR = 1.3E−12), Arsi (n = 6 CpG sites, chr18:60917760 - chr18:60917679, mean effect size = −1.51, Empirical Brown’s method: P = 4.64E−6), Creb3l4 (n = 2 CpG sites, chr3:90243866 - chr3:90243888, mean effect size = −2.34, Empirical Brown’s method: P = 5.03E−05), and As3mt (n = 5 CpG sites, chr19:46730273 - chr19:46730349, mean effect size = 1.48, Empirical Brown’s method: P = 3.46E−4) (Fig. 2B, Supplementary Data S2). Dcaf5 is a substrate receptor of the CUL4-DDB1 E3 ubiquitin-protein ligase (CRL4) complex, which binds to the cytosolic region of APP and is involved in the regulation of the ubiquitin-proteasome system19. Arsi encodes arylsulfatase family member I (ARSI), a paralogue of arylsulfatase B (ARSB), which has been associated with AD20 and Parkinson’s disease21, and reported in an EWAS of dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB)22. Creb3l4 encodes a CREB (cAMP responsive element binding) transmembrane protein that functions as transcriptional activator of neuronal plasticity and protection. Of relevance, studies have shown that CREB signaling is downregulated in AD brains23, CREB levels have been reported to be decreased in hippocampal neurons from Tg2576 mice24, and CREB has been suggested to negatively regulate the transcription of tau25. As3mt, encoding for arsenite methyltransferase, has previously been implicated in schizophrenia with a role in neuronal development and differentiation, and was also recently identified to be hypermethylated in AD donors with psychosis26. We leveraged RNA-seq data generated on the same mice17 to test whether genes annotated to genotype-associated DMPs also exhibited altered gene expression. Of the 413 genes with detectable expression, 46 (11.14%) showed a significant difference (P < 0.05) in expression between WT and TG mice (Supplementary Data S3). In addition to Mapt, Prnp and Fgf14, these included many genes not directly related to the transgenes including Arsi (P = 0.0176) and Dab2ip (P = 0.00754) (Supplementary Fig. S5).
Functional enrichment analysis of the genes annotated to genotype-associated DMPs (see Methods) revealed a strong enrichment for pathways that are highly relevant to tau pathology including the positive regulation of apoptosis (FDR = 5.76E−20) and the activity of enzymes involved in the metabolism of inositol (e.g. inositol tetrakisphosphate 1-kinase activity (FDR = 1.11E−21)) and sphingosine (e.g. sphingosine N-acyltransferase activity (FDR = 8.19E−17)) (Supplementary Data S4), which have been previously implicated in AD and are involved in mediating cell death27,28. Of note, among human phenotype ontologies enriched amongst genes annotated to DMPs were neurofibrillary tangles (FDR = 4.3E−9) and global brain atrophy (FDR = 1.74E−09) (Supplementary Data S4). Taken together, we detected significant changes in epigenetic regulation of key genes that play an important role in neuronal survival and plasticity associated with tau neuropathology, with P301L tau overproduction inducing neuronal cell death.
We previously used immunohistochemistry to confirm the progressive accumulation of tau pathology across multiple brain regions in the same mice17 (Supplementary Fig. S6). We next sought to explore DNAm changes associated with the progression of neuropathology in TG mice by identifying sites at which DNAm levels were associated with levels of tau in the entorhinal cortex (see Methods). In total, we identified 7486 DMPs (FDR < 0.05) annotated to 2789 genes (Fig. 2C, Supplementary Data S2) associated with increased levels of tau, with the top-ranked DMP being located upstream of the Cisd3 gene (chr11:97685376, FDR = 7.84E−10, Fig. 2D) encoding an iron–sulfur domain-containing protein that plays a vital role in controlling mammalian lifespan and has been shown to mediate AD-associated neuronal loss29. Other top-ranked sites were located in an intron of Zfp423 (chr8:87750175, effect size = 0.017, FDR = 7.84E−10), and of Adk (chr14:21369243, effect size = 0.016, FDR = 7.19E−9) and in the promoter regions of Insyn2b (chr11:34314785, effect size = 0.015, FDR = 6.65E−8) (Fig. 2D). Of note, Zfp423 encodes a zinc finger transcription factor that regulates apolipoprotein D30 and is upregulated in neurons from the dentate gyrus in aged and AD mice31. To refine these sites associated with tau pathology, we used a beta regression model to further identify sites at which DNAm was characterized by a significant interaction between genotype and age (Supplementary Data S2). A total of 541 DMPs, mapping to 372 genes, were significant in both analyses (FDR < 0.05), highlighting loci where variable DNAm is strongly associated with progression of tau pathology in TG mice (Supplementary Data S2). The top-ranked interaction effects amongst pathology-associated sites were annotated to Kirrel3 (chr9:34618186, interaction FDR = 5.80E−08) and Rbm33 (chr5:28352553, interaction FDR = 5.80E−08) (Supplementary Fig. S7).
DNA methylation changes in J20 cortex are annotated to genes involved in mitochondrial homeostasis
To investigate DNAm changes associated with mutations in APP, we applied the same analysis approach to genome-wide DNAm data from the entorhinal cortex of J20 mice. We identified 2521 genotype-associated DMPs (FDR < 0.05) annotated to 920 genes (Fig. 3A, Supplementary Data S5). Similar to our findings in rTg4510 mice, there was a significant enrichment of hypermethylated sites in TG mice (1785 (70.8%) hypermethylated DMPs and 736 (29.2%) hypomethylated DMPs, binomial test: P = 1.11E−99). The top-ranked J20 DMP was annotated to an intronic region of Zbtb20, a gene known to be disrupted by the transgene insertion14, suggesting this methylation change likely reflects a direct effect of the genetic perturbation. Other notable DMPs (Supplementary Data S5) included sites annotated to Nutf2 (n = 4 CpG sites, chr8:105860982 - chr8:105861009, mean effect size = 1.73, Empirical Brown’s method: P = 9.99E−6, Fig. 3B) – encoding nuclear transport factor 2 (NUTF2), which is reported to aggregate in hippocampal neurons in AD32 – and Tenm2 (n = 3 CpG sites, chr11:36439347 - chr11:36439396, mean effect size = 2.93, Empirical Brown’s method: P = 2.57E−4, Fig. 3B) – encoding teneurin transmembrane protein 2, which is involved in neural development and associated with AD pathogenesis33. Functional enrichment analysis of the genes annotated to DMPs associated with J20 genotype using GREAT (see Methods) identified numerous pathways and functions related to AD including many related to neuroinflammation (e.g. chemokine activity (FDR = 5.81E−10), the cytolytic granule (FDR = 1.37E−15) and cell chemotaxis (FDR = 3.54E−13) (Supplementary Data S4). We leveraged RNA-seq data generated on the same mice17 to test whether genes annotated to genotype-associated DMPs also exhibited altered gene expression. Of the 773 genes with detectable expression, 50 (6.47%) showed a significant difference (P < 0.05) in expression between WT and TG mice (Supplementary Data S6). The top-ranked differentially expressed gene annotated to a J20-associated DMP was Slc6a11 (P = 4.20E−05) (Supplementary Fig. S8) that encodes a sodium-dependent transporter involved in the uptake of in the inhibitory neurotransmitter gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA).
Fig. 3. Differential DNA methylation in J20 mice.
A Manhattan plot showing transgene-associated differential methylation positions (DMPs) in J20 mice (n = 63, 32 WT, 31 TG). Red dots correspond to sites characterized by a significant (FDR < 0.05 (RRBS P < 9.15E−05, array P < 2.4E−05)) increase in DNA methylation in TG mice compared to controls. Blue dots correspond to sites characterized by a significant decrease in DNA methylation in TG mice. B Shown are the gene tracks and top-ranked differentially methylated sites annotated to (i) Nutf2 (n = 4 CpG sites, chr8:105860982 - chr8:105861009, mean effect size = 1.73. Top-ranked site: chr8:105860982, effect size = 2.19, FDR = 1.72E-5) and (ii) Tenm2 (n = 3 CpG sites, chr11:36439347 - chr11:36439396, mean effect size = 2.93. Top-ranked site: chr11:36439396, effect size = 2.92, FDR = 1.54E−3) between WT and J20 TG mice. Black and red dots refer to WT and TG, respectively, and the red lines on the tracks refer to the location of CpG sites. C Manhattan plot showing DMPs associated with progressive Aβ pathology in J20 TG mice. Red dots correspond to sites characterized by a significant (FDR < 0.05 (RRBS P < 7.70E−05, array P < 4.80E−05)) increase in DNA methylation with increased pathology. Blue dots correspond to sites characterized by a significant decrease in DNA methylation with increased pathology. D Shown are the gene tracks and top-ranked differentially methylated sites annotated to (i) Grk2 (chr19:4305267, effect size = −2.02, FDR = 2.61E−14; chr19:4305262, effect size = −1.99, FDR = 2.61E−14), (ii) Fgfr2 (chr7:130261095, effect size = −1.661, FDR = 1.10E−6; chr7:130261108, effect size = −1.657, FDR = 1.23E−6), (iii) Ncam2 (chr16:81200030, effect size = −2.01, FDR = 2.67E−5), and (iv) Zmiz1 (n = 2 DMP sites, chr14:25456805-chr14:25456832, mean effect size = −1.31, P = 8.07E−6), between WT and J20 TG mice with progressive Aβ pathology. Black and red dots refer to WT and TG, respectively, and the red lines on the tracks refer to the location of CpG sites.
We previously used immunohistochemistry to quantify the progressive accumulation of amyloid pathology across multiple brain regions in the same mice17 (Supplementary Fig. S9). We next examined DNAm changes associated with Aβ levels in the entorhinal cortex (see Methods) identifying 2136 DMPs (FDR < 0.05) annotated to 754 genes (Fig. 3C, Supplementary Data S5). The two top-ranked DMPs (chr19:4305267, effect size = −2.02, FDR = 2.61E−14; chr19:4305262, effect size = −1.99, FDR = 2.61E−14, Fig. 3D) were annotated to the first intron of Grk2, which encodes a G protein-coupled receptor kinase that has been widely implicated in the generation of Aβ in AD34, with its overexpression recognized as a primary hallmark of mitochondrial lesions35. Other top-ranked sites were annotated to the promoter of Fgfr2 (chr7:130261095, effect size = −1.661, FDR = 1.10E−6; chr7:130261108, effect size = −1.657, FDR = 1.23E−6, Fig. 3D). A number of these DMPs (n = 42) were also characterized by a significant genotype-by-age interaction effect (Data S5), and included sites annotated to the promoter region of Ncam2 (chr16:81200030, effect size = −2.01, FDR = 2.67E−5) encoding neural cell adhesion molecule 2 (NCAM2), an intergenic region of Zmiz1 (n = 2 DMP sites, chr14:25456805-chr14:25456832, mean effect size = −1.3, P = 8.07E−6), and the promoter regions of Prmt8 (n = 2 DMP sites, chr6:127768697 - chr6:127768710, mean effect size = −0.95, Empirical Brown’s method: P = 9.56E−4) encoding protein arginine methyltransferase 8 (PRMT8) (Fig. 3D). Of note, levels of NCAM2 have been found to be depleted in the hippocampus of AD donors and APP transgenic mouse models36. Recent studies identified ZMIZ1 as significantly associated with mitophagy in Lewy body disease and reduced neuropathology burden, indicating a neuroprotective role for facilitating appropriate degradation of damaged mitochondria37. PRMT8 is reported to modulate mitochondrial bioenergetics and neuroinflammation in response to hypoxic stress38. Collectively, our results suggest that DNA methylation changes annotated to genes involved in neuroinflammation and the regulation of mitochondrial function are associated with progressive Aβ pathology.
Finally, we compared DNAm differences identified in J20 mice with those identified in rTg4510 mice at sites profiled in both models. Overall, the correlation of effect sizes between models was low (genotype: RRBS sites r = 0.03, array sites r = 0.04; pathology: RRBS sites = 0.04, array sites = 0.18). These results suggest that there is limited overlap in DNAm changes associated with tau and Aβ pathology, corroborating results from our previous gene expression study17. Six genotype-associated DMPs (Supplementary Data S7), however, were identified in both transgenic models, including four sites annotated to the promoter of the SATB1 gene associated with genotype (TG vs WT) differences. Notably, SATB1 is a DNA binding protein associated with neurodegenerative disease that functions to prevent cellular senescence in post-mitotic dopaminergic neurons39,40.
Tau and Aβ-associated DNA methylation changes are more pronounced in the hippocampus
We next performed DNAm profiling on hippocampal tissue from the same rTg4510 and J20 mice using the Illumina mammalian methylation array (rTg4510 WT = 31, TG = 30; J20 WT = 32, TG = 31; see Methods for details). Following preprocessing and stringent quality control, we retained all 23,588 array sites in the hippocampus dataset that overlapped with those profiled in the entorhinal cortex. In the rTg4510 model, we observed more extensive DNAm differences in the hippocampus than in the entorhinal cortex, with 374 DMPs associated with genotype differences between TG and WT and 8857 DMPs associated with immunohistochemically measured tau pathology (Fig. 4A and Supplementary Data S8). Although genotype-associated differences showed minimal concordance between hippocampus and entorhinal cortex across all sites tested (r = 0.03, P = 1.09E−6, Supplementary Fig. S10), six DMPs (Dcaf5 (chr12:80436248), Satb1 (chr17:51746925), Cltc (chr11:8670046), Mapt (chr11:104318231), Ncapg2 (chr12:116425797), Fgf14 (chr14:124676565)) were shared between the two brain regions (Supplementary Fig. S11) and their corresponding effect sizes were almost perfectly correlated (r = 1, P = 3.37E−5, Supplementary Fig. S10). In contrast, tau pathology-associated DMPs were more strongly correlated across brain regions (r = 0.42, P = 0, Supplementary Fig. S10), with 1567 DMPs shared between the entorhinal cortex and hippocampus (Fig. 4A). The top-ranked DMPs associated with levels of tau pathology in rTg4510 TG mice in both the entorhinal cortex and the hippocampus were Dennd1a and Rapgefl1 (Fig. 4B); of note age-associated DNA methylation changes near the Rapgefl1 gene were recently identified in another mouse model of AD pathology41. Among the 7384 significant hippocampal-specific DMPs (genotype: n = 288 sites annotated to 238 genes, tau pathology: n = 7268 sites annotated to 2487 genes), the top-ranked DMPs included sites annotated to the exonic region of Pxk (chr14:8146212; hippocampus: effect size = −0.39, FDR = 2.73E−06; entorhinal cortex: effect size = −0.14, FDR = 0.89), Mef2c (chr13:83504232 - hippocampus: effect size = 0.34, FDR = 7.14E−06; entorhinal cortex: effect size = −0.18, FDR = 0.51), and Meis2 (chr2:116018971 - hippocampus: effect size = 0.014, FDR = 4.44E−25; entorhinal cortex: effect size = 0.0014, FDR = 0.84) (Fig. 4C). Of note, MEIS2 downregulation has been found to improve memory retention of AD mice42 and MEF2C is a synaptic transcription factor implicated in AD43. In the J20 model, we also observed more DMPs in the hippocampus than in the entorhinal cortex (Fig. 4A), with 71 genotype-associated DMPs and 2,075 DMPs associated with levels of Aβ (Fig. 4D, Supplementary Data S9). In contrast to the rTg4510 model, however, no DMPs were shared between brain regions and overall effect sizes for Aβ-associated methylation differences across all profiled sites were uncorrelated across tissues (Supplementary Fig. S12). These results suggest that tau-associated DNAm differences in rTg4510 mice are more similar across brain regions, with more widespread methylation changes in the hippocampus than the entorhinal cortex, compared to Aβ-related changes in J20 mice that appear to be highly region-specific.
Fig. 4. Transgene-associated DMPs exhibit distinct DNA methylation profiles in the entorhinal cortex and hippocampus.
A Venn diagram showing the number of array-detected significant DMPs in (i) rTg4510 and (ii) J20 entorhinal cortex (ECX) and hippocampus (HIP) associated with genotype and progressive pathology. B Shown are the top-ranked DMPs associated with progressive tau pathology in rTg4510 TG mice in both the entorhinal cortex and the hippocampus annotated to (i) Dennd1a and (ii) Rapgefl1. Black and blue dots refer to WT and TG, respectively. C Shown are the top-ranked DMPs associated with tau pathology in rTg4510 TG vs WT mice in the hippocampus but not in entorhinal cortex: (i) Pxk (chr14:8146212; hippocampus: effect size = −0.39, FDR = 2.73E−06; entorhinal cortex: effect size = −0.14, FDR = 0.89), (ii) Mef2c (chr13:83504232 - hippocampus: effect size = 0.34, FDR = 7.14E−06; entorhinal cortex: effect size = -0.18, FDR = 0.506). Shown are also the top-ranked DMPs associated with associated with progressive tau pathology in rTg4510 mice in the hippocampus but not in entorhinal cortex: (iii) Agbl5 (chr4:109806599 - hippocampus: effect size = 0.012, FDR = 1.05E-40; entorhinal cortex: effect size = 0.0086, FDR = 0.052), (iv) Meis2 (chr2:116018971 - hippocampus: effect size = 0.014, FDR = 4.44E−25; entorhinal cortex: effect size = 0.0014, FDR = 0.84). Black and blue dots refer to WT and TG, respectively. D Shown are the top-ranked DMPs associated with Aβ pathology in J20 TG vs WT mice in the hippocampus but not in entorhinal cortex: (i) Mir568 (chr16:43609394; hippocampus: effect size = 0.80, FDR = 1.46E−05; entorhinal cortex: effect size = −0.23, FDR = 0.78) and (ii) Mctp1 (chr13:76810803; hippocampus: effect size = 0.33, FDR = 6.63E−03; entorhinal cortex: effect size = −0.12, FDR = 0.74) associated with Aβ pathology in J20 TG vs WT mice. Shown are also the top-ranked DMPs associated with progressive Aβ pathology in J20 mice, significant in the hippocampus but not in the entorhinal cortex: (iii) Sox4 (chr13:28949481; hippocampus: effect size = 0.013, FDR = 1.79E−11; entorhinal cortex: effect size = 0.15, FDR = 0.96), (iv) Cetn3 (chr13:81828611; hippocampus: effect size = 0.013, FDR = 1.79E−11; entorhinal cortex: effect size = 0.15, FDR = 0.96). Black and red dots refer to WT and TG, respectively.
Accumulation of tau is associated with accelerated epigenetic age
Given that recent studies have reported an association between accelerated DNAm age and neuropathology in human AD44, we next applied epigenetic clock algorithms to our data. Using an epigenetic clock derived from sites on the Illumina mammalian methylation array and previously calibrated on mouse cortex45,46, we found an overall strong relationship between epigenetic age and chronological age across all samples (TG and WT) in both the entorhinal cortex (rTg4510: r = 0.89, P = 1.52E−14; J20: r = 0.81, P = 2.1E−10) and hippocampus (rTg4510: r = 0.87, P = 7.39E−14; J20: r = 0.90, P = 4.65E−15) (Supplementary Fig. S13). We then investigated whether there was an acceleration of epigenetic age associated with AD pathology, and observed an increase in epigenetic age specifically in the hippocampus of older TG rTg4510 compared to WT mice (6 months: t-test P = 0.031; 8 months: t-test P = 0.032); no epigenetic age acceleration was observed in the entorhinal cortex, potentially reflecting the more extensive DNAm changes observed in the hippocampus relative to the cortex. TG J20 mice did not show an increase in epigenetic age compared to WT mice (Supplementary Fig. S13), supporting previous studies on human postmortem tissue that found accelerated epigenetic age was more positively associated with neurofibrillary tangles than amyloid load47.
Changes in DNA methylation parallel those identified in human Alzheimer’s disease brains
To evaluate the translational relevance of DNAm changes observed in transgenic models of AD, we compared our findings with those from a recent large-scale EWAS meta-analysis of postmortem human cortex (n > 2000 donors)16, which identified 334 DMPs associated with Tau Braak stage. Of the 171 genes annotated to these human DMPs, 149 had conserved mouse orthologs, and notably of these, 38 (25.5%) were also annotated to sites significantly associated with either genotype or tau pathology progression in the rTg4510 mouse model (Fig. 5A, Supplementary Data S10). The most significant DMPs in the rTg4510 entorhinal cortex overlapping with those identified in AD brain were located in the intronic region of Ank1 (Fig. 5B) spanning three sites that were significantly hypermethylated in TG mice (chr8:23023240: effect size = 0.905, FDR = 1.03E−02; chr8:23023210: effect size = 0.912, FDR = 1.37E−02, chr8:23023192: effect size = 0.926, FDR = 1.73E−02). We independently validated this finding by quantifying methylation of a subset of the Ank1-annotated sites using bisulfite pyrosequencing (chr8:23023192: t-test = 8.28E−3; chr8:23023240: t-test = 1.3E−2) (Fig. 5B). Of note, hypermethylation of sites annotated to the ANK1 gene represents one of the most robust findings in studies of human AD cortex48. Similarly, in the J20 mouse model of amyloid pathology, 20 genes (13.4%) annotated to human AD-associated DMPs also exhibited significant methylation changes associated with either genotype or Aβ pathology progression. The most significant overlap was observed at a CpG site in the promoter of Tspan14 (chr14:40966816, effect size = −1.49, FDR = 1.16E−02).
Fig. 5. DNA methylation differences identified in mice overlap with AD-associated methylation changes in human brains.
A Venn diagram showing the number of genes annotated to significant DMPs identified in rTg4510 mice, J20 mice, and human AD cortex. DMPs associated with 8 genes overlapped between both models and human AD. B Scatter plot showing the methylation estimates from RRBS (chr8:23023240: effect size = 0.905, FDR = 1.03E−02; chr8:23023210: effect size = 0.912, FDR = 1.37E−02, chr8:23023192: effect size = 0.926, FDR = 1.73E−02) and bisulfite pyrosequencing (chr8:23023192: t-test = 8.28E−3; chr8:23023240: t-test = 1.3E−2) of the DMPs annotated to Ank1. Black and blue dots refer to WT and rTg4510 TG, respectively.
Strikingly, eight genes (Nrxn2, St7, Prdm16, Camta1, Lhpp, Runx2, Map7, and Runx3) were commonly associated with DMPs in all three datasets: tau pathology in rTg4510 entorhinal cortex, Aβ pathology in J20 entorhinal cortex, and human AD cortex (Supplementary Data S10, S11). Many of these DMPs were annotated to the same homologous intronic region of Prdm16/PRDM16 (rTg4510 entorhinal cortex: 10 DMPs; J20 entorhinal cortex: 2 DMPs) corresponding to a region of differential DNA methylation associated with human AD (hg19: chr1:2995301 - chr1:3332264) (Supplementary Fig. S14). Importantly, PRDM16 is located adjacent to PRDM16-DT, a long non-coding RNA critical for maintaining astrocyte homeostasis and known to be downregulated in AD cortex49. Together, these findings demonstrate a significant convergence of DNAm alterations between transgenic mouse models and human AD brain, reinforcing the utility of these models for studying disease-relevant epigenetic mechanisms and highlighting shared regulatory loci - including ANK1 and PRDM16 - that may underpin pathophysiological processes across species.
Discussion
In this study, we identified DNAm changes in the entorhinal cortex and hippocampus associated with the progression of AD-associated neuropathology in TG models of both tau (rTg4510) and Aβ (J20). To our knowledge, this study represents the most systematic analysis of brain epigenetic variation in models of both tau and Aβ pathology. By profiling a large number of samples spanning multiple time points that encompass the development of AD pathology, integrating RRBS and methylation array technologies, and comparing changes across brain regions and with human epigenomic data, we uncover robust epigenetic signatures of neurodegeneration that offer insight into the early molecular changes associated with pathology.
Our findings suggest that tau and Aβ progression are associated with widespread and partially distinct DNAm alterations, consistent with our prior transcriptomic work in the same models. In the rTg4510 tauopathy model, we observed a substantial number of DMPs, including both expected changes linked to the MAPT transgene and novel alterations in genes implicated in neuronal function (e.g. Creb314, As3mt, Zfp423), ubiquitin signaling (e.g. Dcaf5), and apoptosis regulation. Functional enrichment analysis linked these epigenetic changes to biological processes known to contribute to tau-mediated neurotoxicity, including apoptosis and lipid signaling pathways, supporting a role for DNAm in modulating disease-relevant gene networks.
In contrast, the J20 Aβ model exhibited more modest DNAm changes, with effect sizes notably smaller than those observed in rTg4510 mice. Our results reinforce the notion that Aβ pathology engages distinct molecular pathways compared to tau pathology. Nonetheless, we identified several J20 DMPs annotated to genes with established roles in AD (e.g. Grk2, Ncam2, Zmiz1, and Prmt8). Notably, many of these genes are involved in synaptic organization and mitochondrial homeostasis, and the strong enrichment of J20 DMPs in immune-related pathways aligns with prior transcriptomic studies50 and further underscores the importance of neuroinflammation in Aβ-driven disease progression.
Our results suggest that the extent of DNAm alterations associated with pathology is larger in the hippocampus compared to the entorhinal cortex, particularly in the rTg4510 model. While the entorhinal cortex is among the earliest regions affected in AD, our data suggest that hippocampal pathology may drive more pronounced epigenetic dysregulation, potentially reflecting cumulative effects of pathology over time and neurodegeneration. The observation that tau-associated DNAm changes were more regionally consistent than Aβ-associated changes suggests that tau may exert a broader, more uniform influence on the epigenome, while Aβ-related effects may be more spatially constrained, slower to develop or context-dependent.
Importantly, a subset of the DNAm differences we identified in mouse models mirrored those reported in human AD postmortem cortex. This cross-species concordance strengthens the translational relevance of our findings. For example, hypermethylation of Ank1, previously identified as a robust epigenetic signature of tau pathology in human AD48, was recapitulated in rTg4510 mice and validated through bisulfite pyrosequencing. Similarly, consistent hypermethylation of the Prdm16 locus across mouse models and human brain samples highlights conserved epigenetic responses to neuropathology and supports the utility of these models for dissecting pathogenic mechanisms.
Despite the strengths of this study, some limitations must be acknowledged. First, the RRBS and array-based approaches used in this study primarily target CpG rich regions of the genome, and do not provide information about DNAm at a large proportion of sites in the genome. Second, while DNAm changes associated with the transgenes provide mechanistic insights, some likely reflect direct effects of transgene insertion or unrelated developmental perturbations. We attempted to mitigate this by focusing on pathology-associated DMPs and validating results using multiple platforms. Third, although mouse models recapitulate key features of AD, they lack the full complexity of human disease. Fourth, our analysis was performed on ‘bulk’ entorhinal cortex and hippocampal tissue, comprising a mix of different neural cell types. Given evidence of cell-specific epigenetic signatures in AD and changes in the proportion of different cell-types associated with the development of pathology, this may influence our ability to robustly detect pathology-associated variation. Previous studies on epigenetic differences associated with AD in humans has shown that disease-associated variation is primarily manifest in microglia-enriched nuclei populations16. Future work should use novel fluorescence-activated nuclei sorting (FANS) methods to isolate nuclei from different cell types prior to DNAm profiling to overcome the problems of cellular heterogeneity. Fifth, our analyses were restricted to CpG methylation, while future studies incorporating other epigenetic layers (e.g. hydroxymethylation, chromatin accessibility) will offer a more complete picture of regulatory changes in AD. Finally, to minimize heterogeneity in our study, we further profiled only female mice, though a number of sex differences have been previously reported for these models, with females demonstrating elevated and more progressive pathology than males51. The use of female mice also highlights a potential limitation for the interpretation of our comparison with results from the human AD EWAS meta-analysis. Because the meta-analysis used aggregated summary statistics rather than individual-level data, the EWAS results could not be stratified by sex to extract female-specific effect estimates for direct comparison with our mouse data. Future work would cross-examine results from our study with epigenetic variation in other mouse models, tissue types and male mice for a more comprehensive understanding of the development of tau and amyloid pathology in the AD brain.
In conclusion, our study highlights widespread changes in DNAm associated with the accumulation of both tau and Aβ, and supports the hypothesis that epigenetic alterations play a key role in progression of disease processes. By identifying both model-specific and conserved DNAm signatures associated with tau and Aβ pathology, we highlight genes and pathways (such as SATB1 involved in inhibiting cellular senescence and PRDM16 important in regulating astrocyte function) that may provide mechanistic insight and represent potential therapeutic targets. Future work integrating longitudinal epigenetic, transcriptomic, and proteomic data will be critical for elucidating the causal role of these changes in AD pathogenesis and progression.
Methods
Experimental model and samples
Entorhinal cortex and hippocampal tissue was dissected from rTg4510 and J20 transgenic (TG) mice and age-matched wild-type littermates (WT), in accordance with the UK Animals (Scientific Procedures) Act 1986 and approved by the local Animal Welfare and Ethical Review Board. Tissue from the animals used in this study was previously used in an analysis of pathology-associated gene expression changes and details of breeding, housing conditions, and sample preparation are provided in Castanho et al.17.
Histopathology
Tau and amyloid pathology were quantified as previously described17. Briefly, 6 μm serial sagittal sections (from bregma 0.84 to 3.00) from paraffin-embedded right brain hemispheres from all mice used in this study were mounted on glass slides (two sections per slide) and processed for immunostaining. Heat induced epitope retrieval was performed in a PT Module (Thermo Scientific) containing citrate buffer (dilution 1:100), followed by blocking using normal goat serum (Vector labs, catalog number S-1000). To assess tau pathology, we used mouse monoclonal PG5 as the primary antibody (1:8000), which recognizes tau phosphorylated at Ser409, and biotinylated goat anti-mouse IgG (Vector labs, catalog number BA-9200, lot number 2B0324) as the secondary antibody (1:200). To assess β-amyloid (Aβ) pathology, we used mouse monoclonal biotinylated 3D6 (b3D6, provided by Eli Lilly, 1:1000), which binds to the amino acids 1–5 in Aβ. All samples for each mouse model were immunostained together in an autostainer (Autostainer 720 for PG-5 and 720N for b3D6, Thermo Scientific). Detection was achieved with enzymatic labeling using peroxidase (Vectastain Elite ABC HRP Reagent, Vector Laboratories) and DAB substrate (Vector Laboratories). Images were digitised with a Scanscope AT slide scanner (Aperio) at 20× magnification. Positivity was quantified automatically using a positive pixel algorithm calibrated to ignore non-specific staining, and the burden of tau or amyloid pathology was expressed as percentage area. Negative and positive controls were used for each immunohistochemistry experiment.
DNA isolation
Entorhinal cortex and hippocampal tissue was dissected from 31 female WT mice and 30 female rTg4510 TG, aged 2, 4, 6 and 8 months (n = 7–8 mice per group); and 32 female WT mice and 31 female J20 TG aged 6, 8, 10 and 12 months of age (n = 9–10 mice per group). Only female mice were used in this study because they exhibit more pronounced pathology compared to males51,52, and to minimize heterogeneity between samples. Samples were anonymized, randomized, and processed in blinded batches. Genomic DNA was extracted from each tissue sample using the AllPrep DNA/RNA Mini Kit (Qiagen) and quantified for purity with a NanoDrop 8000 spectrophotometer (Thermo Scientific).
Reduced representation bisulfite sequencing (RRBS)
RRBS libraries were prepared using the Premium RRBS kit (Diagenode) with input concentrations measured using the Qubit dsDNA HS Assay (Thermo Fisher). Sample pooling was based on qPCR quantification (StepOnePlus Real-Time PCR System, Thermo Fisher), and bisulfite-converted pools were quantified with the NEBNext Library Quant Kit (New England Biolabs) to determine enrichment PCR cycle number. Library quality was assessed with High Sensitivity D1000 ScreenTape on a 2200 TapeStation (Agilent), then sequenced on an Illumina HiSeq2500 using 50 bp single-end reads as previously described53. Raw FASTQ files, post quality control (QC) assessment using FASTQC with all samples passing QC, were trimmed with Trim Galore (v0.4.5, Phred score = 20), aligned to the mouse reference genome (GRCm38.p4, mm10) with Bismark (v0.19.0) (--merge_non_CpG --comprehensive) and Bowtie2 (v2.3.4.1) to generate coverage files. Methylation coverage across adjacent palindromic CpG sites were merged using coverage2cytosine (--merge_CpG --discordance 100). Bismark output values across all the samples were subsequently processed using BiSeq (v1.26.0). Raw methylation data was filtered by coverage (minCov = 10, perc.samples = 0.5) with remaining CpG sites smoothed to reduce weighting from sites with unusually high coverage.
Mammalian methylation array
Microarray-based DNA methylation data (entorhinal cortex and hippocampus) was generated using a custom Illumina methylation array (HorvathMammalMethylChip40) covering 37,492 sites15. DNA bisulfite conversions were performed using the Zymo EZ DNA Methylation Kit (ZymoResearch, USA). DNAm levels (β values) were determined by calculating the ratio of intensities between methylated (signal A) and unmethylated (signal B) sites, ranging from 0 (completely unmethylated) to 1 (completely methylated). QC assessment was performed to remove samples with low signal intensities, low bisulfite conversion rate (80%), and a mismatch between predicted (determined by sex probe intensities) and reported sex. The SeSaMe54 method was subsequently used to normalize β values of the remaining samples for each probe. DNA methylation data generated using the Illumina mammalian methylation array was used to generate epigenetic age estimates using a methylation clock specifically calibrated on mouse cortex tissue46 implemented with the MammalMethylClock55 R package.
Differential DNA methylation analysis
Differentially methylated positions (DMPs) in the RRBS and array datasets were identified using a beta regression analysis performed with the R package betareg. As described in our previous study17, significant genotype effects between WT and TG mice and interaction effects associated with progressive changes across age between WT and TG mice were identified by testing the full model (~genotype + age + genotype*age) against the null model (~genotype + age) for the RRBS dataset, and the likelihood ratio test were used with the model (~genotype + age + genotype*age + Chip ID) for the array dataset. To detect significant pathology effects indicating progressive changes in TG mice, the likelihood ratio test (LRT) was used with the model: ~pathology (RRBS) or ~pathology + chip ID (array) with the quantification of tau or Aβ from immunohistochemistry staining as a measure of pathology17. Effect sizes and direction were deduced from the beta estimate of the regression analysis. Gene-wide P values were generated by combining probe-level P values using the Empirical Brown’s method56. The Pearson’s r correlation coefficient is reported unless stated otherwise.
Significant tissue effects between the entorhinal cortex and hippocampus in WT and TG mice from the array datasets were identified using the model: ~tissue + genotype + tissue*genotype + age + (1|Mouse). Differentially methylated positions were subsequently annotated using ChIPseeker (v1.22.1, parameters: annoDb = “org.Mm.eg.db”, tssRegion = c(−1500, 1500)). Probes annotated to the exonic and intron regions of the gene were further cross-referenced and annotated using the mouse reference annotation (vM22, GENCODE) or the mammalian methylation manifest file. In identifying AD-associated epigenetic signatures in the entorhinal cortex, where we profiled DNA methylation using RRBS and the mammalian array, the significant DMPs from the two separate differential methylation analyses were combined and treated as one dataset.
Gene ontology
Genomic Regions Enrichment of Annotations Tool (GREAT) was used to perform functional enrichment analysis of the differentially methylated CpG sites associated with tau and Aβ pathology in the rTg4510 and J20 entorhinal cortex, respectively. We imported the bed file of the corresponding mouse coordinates (mm10) to the GREAT web service (v4.04). To account for reduced genome representation, we used a background bed file that included: (i) CpG sites detected using RRBS and annotated to the promoter using ChIPseeker, (ii) all differentially expressed CpG sites identified in the rTg4510 and J20 TG vs WT cortex and across pathology, and (iii) all the CpG sites in the mammalian methylation array.
Comparative analysis with human data
Differentially methylated positions associated with tau pathology in a meta-analysis of human AD data were extracted from Supplementary Table 8 from our recent publication16. For cross-species comparisons, the human UCSC gene annotations were subsequently converted to the equivalent homologous mouse gene names, considering only mouse-specific homologous genes. This gene set was then used to determine the overlap of genes annotated with DMPs identified in the current study.
Validation of DNA methylation changes using bisulfite pyrosequencing
Forward and reverse primers targeting CpG sites annotated to Ank1 (chr8: 23023193 - 23023241, mm10) were designed using PyroMark Assay Design software 2.0 (Qiagen, UK). DNA from rTg4510 mice (n = 14, 2 and 8 months) was isolated using AllPrep DNA/RNA Mini Kit (QIAGEN) and underwent bisulfite conversion using the EZ DNA Methylation-Gold™ Kit (Zymo Research). Following PCR amplification, DNA methylation was profiled using the PyroMark Q48 AutoPrep platform (Qiagen, UK).
Supplementary information
Acknowledgements
We would like to thank Mark Ward, Katherine Sung, Alice Fisher, and Claire Cella for technical assistance with histopathology, and Aaron Jeffries and Audrey Farbos for technical assistance with sequencing. This research received funding support from the Medical Research Council (MRC) Proximity to Discovery: Industry Engagement Fund (Precision Medicine Exeter Innovation Platform reference MC_PC_14127) and a research grant from Alzheimer’s Research UK (ARUK-PG2018B-016). I.C.’s doctoral studentship was supported by the Alzheimer's Society in partnership with the Garfield Weston Foundation (grant 231). Sequencing and computational facilities were supported by an MRC Clinical Infrastructure award (MR/M008924/1); the Wellcome Trust Institutional Strategic Support Fund (WT097835MF); a Wellcome Trust Multi-User Equipment Award (WT101650MA); and a Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BBSRC) Longer and Larger (LoLa) award (BB/K003240/1).
Author contributions
J.M., Z.A., and I.C designed the study. I.C conducted RRBS, array, and immunohistochemistry laboratory experiments. S.K.L. led primary data analysis and bioinformatics, with analytical and computational input from I.C. (RRBS pre-processing), E.W. (RRBS differential methylation analysis), A.D. (array pre-processing and analysis), D.S.V. (DMP annotations). E.H. J.M., K.L., and E.D. obtained funding. S.P. and R.S. performed pyrosequencing under the supervision of A.R.S. S.K.L, J.M., and I.C. drafted the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final submission.
Data availability
Raw mammalian methylation array data and RRBS FASTQ files for both rTg4510 and J20 models have been deposited in the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) under accession number GSE246561. Intermediate files are available on Zenodo (10.5281/zenodo.15741353). All code supporting the results presented in this study is available at https://github.com/SziKayLeung/AD_mouse_methylation.
Competing interests
Z.A. was a full-time employee of Eli Lilly & Company Ltd. at the time this work was performed. All other authors declare no conflicts of interest.
Footnotes
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
These authors contributed equally: Isabel Castanho, Jonathan Mill.
Contributor Information
Isabel Castanho, Email: i.s.castanho@exeter.ac.uk.
Jonathan Mill, Email: j.mill@exeter.ac.uk.
Supplementary information
The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1038/s44400-026-00074-y.
References
- 1.Scheltens, P. et al. Alzheimer’s disease. Lancet388, 505–517 (2016). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Crews, L. & Masliah, E. Molecular mechanisms of neurodegeneration in Alzheimer’s disease. Hum. Mol. Genet.19, R12–R20 (2010). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Serrano-Pozo, A. et al. Reactive glia not only associates with plaques but also parallels tangles in Alzheimer’s disease. Am. J. Pathol.179, 1373–1384 (2011). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Bellenguez, C. et al. New insights into the genetic etiology of Alzheimer’s disease and related dementias. Nat. Genet.54, 412–436 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Smith, R. G. et al. A meta-analysis of epigenome-wide association studies in Alzheimer’s disease highlights novel differentially methylated loci across cortex. Nat. Commun.12, 1–13 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Sommerer, Y. et al. Entorhinal cortex epigenome-wide association study highlights four novel loci showing differential methylation in Alzheimer’s disease. Alzheimers Res. Ther.15, 92 (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Zhong, M. Z., Peng, T., Duarte, M. L., Wang, M. & Cai, D. Updates on mouse models of Alzheimer’s disease. Mol. Neurodegener.19, 1–33 (2024). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Patel, H., Dobson, R. J. B. & Newhouse, S. J. A meta-analysis of Alzheimer’s disease brain transcriptomic data. J. Alzheimers Dis.68, 1635–1656 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Leung, S. K. et al. Long-read transcript sequencing identifies differential isoform expression in the entorhinal cortex in a transgenic model of tau pathology. Nat. Commun.15, 6458 (2024). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Okhovat, M. et al. Epigenetic and transcriptomic alterations precede amyloidosis in the Alzheimer’s disease AppNL-G-F knock-in mouse model. Sci. Rep.15, 44934 (2025). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Lee, S. et al. Integrated genome-wide analysis of DNA methylation and gene expression in the Hippocampi of 5xFAD Alzheimer’s disease mouse model. J. Integr. Neurosci.23, 138 (2024). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Sundaramoorthy, T. H. & Castanho, I. The neuroepigenetic landscape of vertebrate and invertebrate models of neurodegenerative diseases. Epigenet Insights15, 25168657221135848 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Ramsden, M. et al. Age-dependent neurofibrillary tangle formation, neuron loss, and memory impairment in a mouse model of human tauopathy (P301L). J. Neurosci.25, 10637–10647 (2005). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Tosh, J. L. et al. The integration site of the transgene in the J20 mouse model of Alzheimer’s disease. Wellcome Open Res2, 84 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Arneson, A. et al. A mammalian methylation array for profiling methylation levels at conserved sequences. Nat. Commun.13, 1–13 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Shireby, G. et al. DNA methylation signatures of Alzheimer’s disease neuropathology in the cortex are primarily driven by variation in non-neuronal cell-types. Nat. Commun.13, 1–14 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Castanho, I. et al. Transcriptional signatures of tau and amyloid neuropathology. Cell Rep.30, 2040–2054.e5 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Goodwin, L. O. et al. Large-scale discovery of mouse transgenic integration sites reveals frequent structural variation and insertional mutagenesis. Genome Res.29, 494–505 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Del Prete, D., Rice, R. C., Rajadhyaksha, A. M. & D’Adamio, L. Amyloid precursor protein (APP) may act as a substrate and a recognition unit for CRL4CRBN and Stub1 E3 ligases facilitating ubiquitination of proteins involved in presynaptic functions and neurodegeneration. J. Biol. Chem.291, 17209–17227 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Potkin, S. G. et al. Hippocampal atrophy as a quantitative trait in a genome-wide association study identifying novel susceptibility genes for Alzheimer’s disease. PLoS One4, e6501 (2009). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Jansen, I. E. et al. Discovery and functional prioritization of Parkinson’s disease candidate genes from large-scale whole exome sequencing. Genome Biol.18, 22 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Reho, P. et al. Differential methylation analysis in neuropathologically confirmed dementia with Lewy bodies. Commun. Biol.7, 35 (2024). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Jin, N. et al. CREB regulates the expression of neuronal glucose transporter 3: a possible mechanism related to impaired brain glucose uptake in Alzheimer’s disease. Nucleic Acids Res.41, 3240–3256 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Pugazhenthi, S., Wang, M., Pham, S., Sze, C.-I. & Eckman, C. B. Downregulation of CREB expression in Alzheimer’s brain and in Aβ-treated rat hippocampal neurons. Mol. Neurodegener.6, 60 (2011). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Liu, H. et al. PKA-CREB signaling suppresses tau transcription. J. Alzheimers Dis.46, 239–248 (2015). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Pishva, E. et al. Psychosis-associated DNA methylomic variation in Alzheimer’s disease cortex. Neurobiol. Aging89, 83–88 (2020). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Lee, J. Y. et al. N-AS-triggered SPMs are direct regulators of microglia in a model of Alzheimer’s disease. Nat. Commun.11, 2358 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Stygelbout, V. et al. Inositol trisphosphate 3-kinase B is increased in human Alzheimer brain and exacerbates mouse Alzheimer pathology. Brain137, 537–552 (2014). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Chen, Y.-F. et al. Upregulation of Cisd2 attenuates Alzheimer’s-related neuronal loss in mice. J. Pathol.250, 299–311 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Ma, P. et al. Promotion effect of TGF-β-Zfp423-ApoD pathway on lip sensory recovery after nerve sacrifice caused by nerve collateral compensation. Int. J. Oral. Sci.15, 23 (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Sziraki, A. et al. A global view of aging and Alzheimer’s pathogenesis-associated cell population dynamics and molecular signatures in human and mouse brains. Nat. Genet.55, 2104–2116 (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Sheffield, L. G., Miskiewicz, H. B., Tannenbaum, L. B. & Mirra, S. S. Nuclear pore complex proteins in Alzheimer disease. J. Neuropathol. Exp. Neurol.65, 45–54 (2006). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Dai, D. L., Li, M. & Lee, E. B. Human Alzheimer’s disease reactive astrocytes exhibit a loss of homeostastic gene expression. Acta Neuropathol. Commun.11, 127 (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Obrenovich, M. E. et al. Overexpression of GRK2 in alzheimer disease and in a chronic hypoperfusion rat model is an early marker of brain mitochondrial lesions. Neurotox. Res.10, 43–56 (2006). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Obrenovich, M. E., Palacios, H. H., Gasimov, E., Leszek, J. & Aliev, G. The GRK2 overexpression is a primary hallmark of mitochondrial lesions during early Alzheimer disease. Cardiovasc Psychiatry Neurol.2009, 327360 (2009). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Leshchyns’ka, I. et al. Aβ-dependent reduction of NCAM2-mediated synaptic adhesion contributes to synapse loss in Alzheimer’s disease. Nat. Commun.6, 8836 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Hou, X. et al. Genome-wide association study identifies and variants as mitophagy modifiers in Lewy body disease. medRxiv10.1101/2023.10.16.23297100(2023)
- 38.Couto E Silva, A. et al. Protein arginine methyltransferase 8 modulates mitochondrial bioenergetics and neuroinflammation after hypoxic stress. J. Neurochem.159, 742–761 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Riessland, M. et al. Loss of SATB1 induces p21-dependent cellular senescence in post-mitotic dopaminergic neurons. Cell Stem Cell25, 514–530.e8 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Wang, Y. et al. The role of cellular senescence in neurodegenerative diseases. Arch. Toxicol.98, 2393–2408 (2024). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Krunic, A. et al. Brain DNA methylation atlas of AppNL-G-F Alzheimer’s disease model mice across age and region reveals choline-induced resilience. Aging Cell24, e70241 (2025). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Cui, Y. et al. Myeloid ectopic viral integration site 2 accelerates the progression of Alzheimer’s disease. Aging Cell23, e14260 (2024). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Udeochu, J. C. et al. Tau activation of microglial cGAS–IFN reduces MEF2C-mediated cognitive resilience. Nat. Neurosci.26, 737–750 (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Grodstein, F. et al. The association of epigenetic clocks in brain tissue with brain pathologies and common aging phenotypes. Neurobiol. Dis.157, 105428 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Lu, A. T. et al. Universal DNA methylation age across mammalian tissues. Nat. Aging3, 1144–1166 (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Mozhui, K. et al. Genetic loci and metabolic states associated with murine epigenetic aging. Elife11, e75244 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Levine, M. E. et al. An epigenetic biomarker of aging for lifespan and healthspan. Aging10, 573–591 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Lunnon, K. et al. Methylomic profiling implicates cortical deregulation of ANK1 in Alzheimer’s disease. Nat. Neurosci.17, 1164–1170 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Schröder, S. et al. PRDM16-DT is a novel lncRNA that regulates astrocyte function in Alzheimer’s disease. Acta Neuropathol.148, 32 (2024). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Rothman, S. M. et al. Human Alzheimer’s disease gene expression signatures and immune profile in APP mouse models: a discrete transcriptomic view of Aβ plaque pathology. J. Neuroinflammation15, 1–15 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Yue, M., Hanna, A., Wilson, J., Roder, H. & Janus, C. Sex difference in pathology and memory decline in rTg4510 mouse model of tauopathy. Neurobiol. Aging32, 590–603 (2011). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Blackmore, T. et al. Tracking progressive pathological and functional decline in the rTg4510 mouse model of tauopathy. Alzheimers Res. Ther.9, 77 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Gu, H. et al. Preparation of reduced representation bisulfite sequencing libraries for genome-scale DNA methylation profiling. Nat. Protoc.6, 468–481 (2011). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Zhou, W., Triche, T. J., Laird, P. W. & Shen, H. SeSAMe: reducing artifactual detection of DNA methylation by Infinium BeadChips in genomic deletions. Nucleic Acids Res.46, e123–e123 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Zoller, J. & Horvath, S. MammalMethylClock R package: software for DNA methylation-based epigenetic clocks in mammals. Bioinformatics40, btae280 (2024). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 56.Poole, W., Gibbs, D. L., Shmulevich, I., Bernard, B. & Knijnenburg, T. A. Combining dependent P-values with an empirical adaptation of Brown’s method. Bioinformatics32, i430–i436 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
Raw mammalian methylation array data and RRBS FASTQ files for both rTg4510 and J20 models have been deposited in the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) under accession number GSE246561. Intermediate files are available on Zenodo (10.5281/zenodo.15741353). All code supporting the results presented in this study is available at https://github.com/SziKayLeung/AD_mouse_methylation.





