Skip to main content
Brain Communications logoLink to Brain Communications
. 2026 Mar 30;8(2):fcag109. doi: 10.1093/braincomms/fcag109

Ferroptosis in microglial activation: a systematic review and multidata comparison

Ida Pesämaa 1,, Srinivas Koutarapu 2, Henrik Zetterberg 3,4,5,6,7,8, Stefanie Fruhwürth 9
PMCID: PMC13056721  PMID: 41958920

Abstract

Ferroptosis is a redox-driven and iron-dependent type of programmed cell death, with lipid peroxidation as a central and required feature of the process. During ferroptosis, cells exert strong proinflammatory effects, suggesting that ferroptosis may play a role in the regulation of inflammation and immune response. However, very few studies have investigated the process of ferroptosis and lipid peroxidation in microglia, the innate immune cells of the brain. In this review, we summarize the concept of ferroptosis and present a list of 120 ferroptosis-relevant proteins, which includes over twice as many entries as the current Kyoto Encyclopaedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathway for ferroptosis. We compare our manually compiled list with microglial activation signatures reported by us and others, revealing ferroptosis-relevant changes in models for microglial activation. Finally, we highlight a selection of ferroptosis-relevant proteins as potential biomarker candidates for ferroptosis.

Keywords: microglia, ferroptosis, inflammation, neuroinflammation


In this review, Pesämaa et al. collect and present evidence of ferroptosis-related pathways in activated microglia. They compile an expanded list of ferroptosis-relevant proteins and compare it with reported microglial activation signatures, highlighting extracellular detectability and proposing that ferroptosis warrants further investigation as a potential contributor to microglial biology and biomarker development.

Graphical Abstract

Graphical Abstract.

For image description, please refer to the figure legend and surrounding text.

Introduction

Cell death is an irreversible physiological process occurring when cells are incapable of maintaining their most fundamental functions. Cell death modalities are traditionally classified as an uncontrolled process (non-programmed cell death) or as an orchestrated event involving signalling cascades (programmed cell death). Programmed cell death may be further categorized as lytic (e.g. necroptosis and pyroptosis) or non-lytic (e.g. apoptosis). While apoptosis is generally regarded as immunologically silent, lytic forms of cell death provoke inflammatory responses through the release of proinflammatory signals.1-3

The term ferroptosis was first coined in 2012 to describe a redox-driven and iron-dependent type of programmed cell death with proinflammatory properties.4 The proinflammatory features of ferroptosis include the release of cytokines (e.g. TNFα, IL-1β, IL-6, CXCL1, CXCL8 and GM-CSF) and profound alterations of lipid metabolism culminating in extensive lipid peroxidation.5,6 Products of lipid peroxidation may act as proinflammatory mediators and, in parallel, compromise the integrity and function of the plasma membrane.5 Morphologically, ferroptosis is largely associated with mitochondrial abnormalities, including mitochondrial shrinkage and increased mitochondrial membrane density. In contrast to apoptosis, ferroptosis predominantly involves plasma membrane rupture, consistent with its classification as a lytic process.7 Nevertheless, ferroptotic features have also been observed in the absence of plasma membrane rupture, with the potential for intercellular propagation through direct membrane contacts.8 Together, these features highlight ferroptosis as a uniquely multifaceted cell death programme with mechanistic diversity and biological complexity.

In this review, we summarize the main features and pathways of ferroptosis with a particular focus on neurodegenerative diseases and microglial biology. We also present our manually curated list of 120 ferroptosis-relevant proteins, which we compare with microglial activation signatures reported by us and others across multiple models where microglial activation has been confirmed: (i) 5xFAD mouse microglia,9 (ii) Grn knockout (ko) mouse microglia and CSF,10 (iii) GRN ko human induced pluripotent stem cell-derived microglia (hiMG) lysate and media,10 (iv) APP/PS1 mouse microglia,11 (v) APP-NL-G-F (APP-KI) mouse microglia11 and (vi) A30P-αS mouse CSF.12 These comparisons demonstrate both the presence of ferroptotic features in activated microglia and the extracellular detectability of ferroptosis-related proteins. Together, these observations indicate that ferroptotic processes are active within microglia and, despite the complexity and need for further mechanistic investigation, can be measured extracellularly. This highlights a key opportunity for biomarker research to define and evaluate the ferroptotic profile of microglia.

Iron homeostasis and the brain

In the brain, both ferrous (Fe2+) and ferric (Fe3+) iron, is involved in many different processes such as myelination, neurotransmission, oxygen transport, cellular division and mitochondrial energy production.13-16 Iron homeostasis is regulated by several factors involved in the import, export and storage of iron. Moreover, the maintenance of iron equilibrium also depends on the dynamic conversion of Fe2+ and Fe3+, a process which is regulated by ferrireductases and ferroxidases. Increased intracellular iron accumulation and expansion of the labile iron pool (LIP) promote excessive formation of reactive oxygen species (ROS), leading to toxic downstream effects such as oxidative stress and lipid peroxidation (Fig. 1).17,18 Lipid peroxidation is a distinct feature and promoter of ferroptosis.19,20 In addition to intracellular iron accumulation and lipid peroxidation, typical hallmarks of ferroptosis include increased production of autophagosomes, cytoplasmic swelling, impaired membrane integrity and mitochondrial abnormalities due to ROS.21

Figure 1.

For image description, please refer to the figure legend and surrounding text.

An overview of ferroptosis. Graphical illustration summarizing ferroptosis-related pathways with the associated proteins (denoted by their gene name) and genes. This diagram integrates data from various sources and methodologies, providing a generalized representation of ferroptosis-relevant mechanisms that are not specific to any cell type or species. ROS, reactive oxygen species; LIP, labile iron pool; FA, fatty acid; PUFA, polyunsaturated fatty acid; MUFA, monounsaturated fatty acid; ISC, iron-sulphur cluster; ARE, antioxidant response elements.

Notably, microglia, the innate immune cells of the central nervous system (CNS), have been suggested to encompass the highest iron storage capacity of all the cell types within the brain.22,23 However, until recently, the role of ferroptosis in the context of microglial activation had not been studied. Now, accumulating evidence propose that iron and ferroptosis are indeed associated with microglial activation and oxidative stress.17,24-28 In this review, we highlight the significance of ferroptosis and lipid peroxidation, emphasizing their association with neurodegenerative diseases and their potential involvement in microglial activation. Furthermore, our curated list of 120 proteins (referred to by gene name), ‘Ferroptosis List 2025’, offers a valuable resource for pathway analysis, particularly given the limited representation of ‘ferroptosis’ in current data bases (with only 42 entries in KEGG pathway hsa04216) (Fig. 2). Lastly, we highlight extracellularly detectable proteins as potential biomarker candidates for assessing ferroptotic signatures.

Figure 2.

For image description, please refer to the figure legend and surrounding text.

Ferroptosis list 2025: a manually generated list of ferroptosis-associated proteins. Our manually curated list of 120 ferroptosis-relevant proteins, comprising 42 proteins annotated in the KEGG ferroptosis pathway and 78 additional unique entries that are absent in the KEGG ferroptosis pathway. Source: KEGG, https://www.genome.jp/entry/pathway+hsa04216; November 28 2025.

The cellular uptake of iron

There are different mechanisms as to how iron is imported into the cell, with the most common being endocytosis-mediated uptake via the transferrin receptor 1 (TFR1, encoded by the TFRC gene). TFR1 is a cell surface receptor and an acknowledged marker for ferroptosis.29 The iron uptake by TFR1 is enabled by transferrin (TF), a secreted glycoprotein that binds two Fe3+ ions before binding to TFR1 and being transferred across the cell membrane via clathrin-mediated endocytosis (Fig. 1).29-32 TFR1 also enables the transfer of TF-bound iron across the blood brain barrier (BBB) and into the CNS.33,34 However, under conditions such as injury, ischaemia, inflammation or ageing, non-TF-bound iron (NTBI) and ferritin may also cross the BBB via lipid raft domains enriched in the scaffolding protein caveolin-1 (CAV1), which plays an important role in transcellular transport as well as in lipid homeostasis.32,35,36 While TFR1 and CAV1 mediate the transport of iron from the blood into the CNS, hepcidin (encoded by the HAMP gene) counteracts this event and reduces brain iron levels. The astrocyte-derived hepcidin directly affects the microvascular endothelial cells via the iron exporter ferroportin (FPN, also known as FPN1, encoded by the gene SLC40A1).37,38

Within the endosome, the acidic environment promotes the release of Fe3+, whereupon the non-bound Fe3+ is converted to Fe2+ by reductases such as six-transmembrane epithelial antigen prostate 3 (STEAP3, also known as TSAP6). Fe2+ is then translocated from the endosome to the cytosol via transporters such as DMT1 (encoded by the gene SLC11A2). DMT1 is a significant contributor to the cytosolic levels of Fe2+, as this transporter is also located at the cell surface where it mediates the translocation of extracellular Fe2+ across the plasma membrane into the cytosol (Fig. 1).21,39-41 Similar to TF, lactotransferrin [LTF, also known as lactoferrin (LF)] binds extracellular Fe3+ and promotes ferroptosis by increasing the cellular uptake of iron.42

In addition to DMT1, NTBI may be taken up by metal cation symporters Zrt- and Irt-like protein 8 (ZIP8) and ZIP14 (encoded by genes SLC39A8 and SLC39A14, respectively). ZIP8 and ZIP14 mediate the uptake of NTBI across the plasma membrane, as well as the release of Fe2+ from the endosome (Fig. 1).43-46 Recently, another member of the ZIP family, namely ZIP7 (encoded by the SLC39A7 gene), has been proposed as a novel genetic factor associated with ferroptosis.47

Lipid peroxidation a key feature of ferroptosis

Within the cell, Fe2+ (as present in the LIP) may be processed and encounter different fates. One fate of Fe2+ is the Fenton reaction, where Fe2+ reacts with H2O2 to yield Fe3+ and highly reactive hydroxyl radicals (HO). While Fe3+ is less reactive, the resulting ROS can cause oxidative stress and subsequent damage to DNA, proteins and lipids—including lipid peroxidation (Fig. 1).48-51

As a later hallmark of the ferroptotic process, with subsequent membrane rupture as the ultimate endpoint, lipid peroxidation represents a dynamic process that can actively drive ferroptosis through self-amplifying mechanisms. Ferroptotic features can be present without detectable lipid peroxidation (e.g. iron dyshomeostasis and extensive ROS formation), but lipid peroxidation is nonetheless required for ferroptosis to proceed as a canonical cell death modality.52,53 Prior to compromising membrane integrity, lipid peroxidation involves the progressive accumulation of lipid peroxides. Thus, lipid peroxidation represents a central, self-reinforcing driver of the ferroptotic cascade.51,54 Apart from ROS, fatty acids (FAs), especially polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFAs), constitute a central component of the process of lipid peroxidation (Fig. 1). A cell’s susceptibility to ferroptosis is largely dependent on the homeostasis of PUFA synthesis and degradation.30,54 Accumulating evidence demonstrate the importance of beta-oxidation (a common lipid metabolism pathway), which regulates the availability of FAs in the cytosol. Once beta-oxidation is disrupted there is an increase of cytosolically available FAs, which promotes lipid peroxidation and subsequently ferroptosis.30,55-57 PUFAs, especially arachidonic acid, are favourable substrates for lipid peroxidation.30,56 The incorporation of PUFAs into membrane phospholipids requires acylation and esterification, reactions that heavily rely on acyl-CoA synthetase long-chain family member 4 (ACSL4) and lysophospholipid acyltransferase 5 (LPCAT3). The final step of lipid peroxidation takes place at the cellular membrane, where the phospholipid-polyunsaturated fatty acids (PL-PUFAs) are attacked by ROS and lipid peroxides are formed (Fig. 1).30,58 Interestingly, exogenous monounsaturated fatty acids (MUFAs) may replace the PUFAs within the plasma membrane and prevent lipid peroxidation and thereby also ferroptosis. This protective mechanism is not completely understood, although acyl-CoA synthetase long-chain family member 3 (ACSL3) appear to be involved in the incorporation of MUFAs into the membrane.59,60

Iron homeostasis and anti-ferroptotic components

In addition to the Fenton reaction, other possible fates of intracellular Fe2+ include iron storage, the formation of iron-sulphur clusters and non-ROS generating ferroxidation. Intracellularly, Fe2+ may interact with ferritin, which is a protein complex consisting of ferritin heavy chain 1 (FTH1) and ferritin light chain (FTL). The main role of ferritin is to store iron and to prevent Fenton reactions, by binding and converting toxic Fe2+ to non-toxic Fe3+ via ferroxidase activity. A similar iron storage process is present within the mitochondria, with mitochondrial ferritin (FTMT) as the key component.43,61 FTMT has been shown to effectively regulate intracellular iron homoeostasis, as ferroptosis models with FTMT overexpression display significant reductions in both LIP and ROS.62 By converting redox-active Fe2+ to Fe3+ and safely storing iron, ferritin and FTMT protect cells from iron-mediated oxidative damage and thereby mitigate their susceptibility to ferroptosis. The ferritin-bound iron is normally either exported via exocytosis or degraded through ferritinophagy, a specific form of autophagy. Autophagic processes, particularly ferritinophagy, play an important role in ferroptosis, as they regulate the cytoplasmic homeostasis of both iron and lipids.63 Furthermore, autophagic activity has been reported to promote ferroptosis through the regulation of SCL7A11 and glutathione peroxidase 4 (GPX4).63,64

Intracellular iron homeostasis heavily relies on the cellular export of iron, which is crucial for preventing iron accumulation and mitigating the risk of ferroptosis. Reported as the only known iron exporter, FPN plays a central role in iron homeostasis.65 Fe2+ is delivered to FPN via poly (RC) binding protein 2 (PCBP2) (Fig. 1).43,49 PCBP1 and PCBP2 work as iron chaperons, although the literature mainly covers PCBP2 and its relevance to iron homeostasis by receiving and delivering iron from iron importers (such as DMT1) to exporters (such as FPN).66 Prominin-2 (encoded by the PROM2 gene) is also involved in the export of iron, but in the form of exocytosis (Fig. 1).21,43 Following iron export through FPN, iron homeostasis is mainly maintained by ceruloplasmin (CP). CP is an extracellularly located glycoprotein, capable of oxidizing Fe2+ to Fe3+ without the generation of ROS (Fig. 1).67 CP, with its ferroxidase activity, plays a central role in iron homeostasis and is considered protective against ferroptosis.68

In addition to increased iron export, ferroptosis may be counteracted by reducing the iron uptake. Heat shock protein beta 1 (also known as HSP27 and HSP28, encoded by the HSPB1 gene) inhibits iron uptake and prevents ferroptosis as well as lipid peroxidation. As a result, increased expression of HSPB1 is considered protective, while reduced HSPB1 expression result in the opposite effect and promotes ferroptosis.69

Given the central role of lipid peroxidation in ferroptosis, several anti-ferroptotic mechanisms are involved in regulating the availability of cytosolic lipids and their propensity to react with ROS. Lipid storage, including the formation of lipid droplets, limits the availability of FAs and PUFAs within the cytosol and thereby reduces their interaction with phospholipids at the plasma membrane. As a result, lipid storage acts as a protective measure against lipid peroxidation, while lipid droplet degradation promotes lipid peroxidation and ferroptosis (Fig. 1).21,42,43,70

System xc and other antioxidative pathways counteracting ferroptosis

System xc is a cystine/glutamate antiporter, consisting of XCT (encoded by the gene solute carrier family 7 member 11, SLC7A11) and MDU1 (encoded by SLC3A2). This antiporter mediates the specific exchange of extracellular cystine and intracellular glutamate, and its downstream effectors play a crucial role in inhibiting lipid peroxidation. As a result, system xc is recognized as one of the most notable anti-ferroptotic pathways.58,71 Once imported by system xc, cystine is reduced to cysteine, which, in combination with glutamate, form gamma-glutamylcysteine (γ-GC). Glutathione synthetase (GSS) catalyses the final step, where γ-GC reacts with glycine to yield GSH, the reduced form of glutathione. GSH is an important antioxidant, involved in the detoxification process of ROS as well as in the process of prostaglandin synthesis. GSH is also essential for the enzymatic activity of GPX4, a central regulator of lipid peroxidation and ferroptosis. GPX4 prevents ferroptotic cell death by reducing phospholipid hydroperoxides to non-toxic lipid alcohols.72 As the precursor to GSH, γ-GC constitutes a critical factor and a rate-limiting substrate in the process of GSH production, thereby modulating cellular susceptibility to ferroptosis.73 In addition to GSS and γ-GC, cytosolic levels of GSH are regulated by the enzyme glutathione reductase (GSR). The oxidized form of glutathione can be converted back into its reduced form (GSH) by GSR, using NADPH as an electron donor. This regeneration is crucial for maintaining the cycle of lipid peroxide detoxification (Fig. 1).72,74 The above-mentioned pathways involving system xc, GSH and GPX4 can be targeted to trigger and model ferroptosis.75

In addition to GSH, ubiquinol is another anti-ferroptotic antioxidant that inhibits lipid peroxidation and ferroptosis via its radical-trapping properties. Ubiquinol is the reduced form of coenzyme Q10 (CoQ10). The generation of ubiquinol is dependent on ferroptosis suppressor protein 1 (FSP1, encoded by the gene AIFM2), which catalyses the reduction of ubiquinone to ubiquinol at the cell membrane. As a result, both ubiquinol and FSP1 act as inhibitors of lipid peroxidation and ferroptosis (Fig. 1).60,72

The transcription factor nuclear factor erythroid 2-related factor 2 (NRF2, also known as NPRF2, encoded by the NFE2L2 gene), alongside Kelch ECH-associated protein 1 (KEAP1), constitutes a stress-responsive signalling pathway that confers cytoprotective and anti-ferroptotic effects.76,77 Under normal conditions, NRF2 is bound to KEAP1, which acts as an adaptor that regulates cytosolic NRF2 levels by enabling ubiquitination and subsequent degradation.76 Upon oxidative stress, cysteine residues on KEAP1 become oxidized, resulting in a conformational change that prevents its ability to target NRF2 degradation. As a result, NRF2 accumulates and translocates to the nucleus, where it binds to antioxidant response elements (ARE) in the promoters of target genes. These include a range of anti-ferroptotic and antioxidant genes such as SLC7A11, GPX4, SLC40A1, HMOX1, GSR, GSS, FTH1, FTL, NQO1, ALDH3A1, AKR1C, MT1G and FECH (Fig. 1).21,48

Ferroptosis in neurological disorders and diseases

Hemochromatosis, also referred to as iron overload, is characterized by excessive iron accumulation in organs, including the liver, pancreas, heart, joints, skin and pituitary gland. This condition represents the most common genetic disease among individuals of Northern European ancestry and is primarily caused by mutations in the HFE gene, which impair the HFE protein’s ability to compete with TF for binding to TFR1, thereby enhancing TF-TFR1 interactions and iron uptake.78,79 While hemochromatosis is a systemic disease, neurological symptoms are rare. However, some studies suggest a possible association between hemochromatosis and movement disorders.80,81 In contrast, aceruloplasminemia, a rare autosomal recessive disorder caused by (mainly loss-of-function) mutations in the CP gene, presents predominantly with neurological symptoms alongside systemic manifestations such as diabetes, retinopathy and liver disease.82,83 Notably, aceruloplasminemia has been associated with altered iron homeostasis in glial cells, suggesting a central role for these cells under pathological conditions.83-85

Independent of the above-mentioned iron-storage conditions, ferroptosis and iron dyshomeostasis have been linked to several neurodegenerative diseases and neuropathological conditions, including Alzheimer’s disease (AD), Parkinson’s disease (PD), Huntington’s disease (HD), amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), multiple sclerosis (MS), as well as traumatic brain injury (TBI).21,22,86-89 While the exact mechanisms remain unclear, the phenotypes related to ferroptosis and lipid peroxidation seem to depend on the neurodegenerative trigger.

AD is a neurodegenerative disease and the most common form of dementia, where both lipid peroxidation and iron accumulation have been reported in post-mortem brain tissue.90,91 A recent study by Thorwald et al.92 identified significant alterations in ferroptosis-associated proteins, including FTL, FPN and the glutamate-cysteine ligase modifier unit, in post-mortem brain tissue of AD patients compared to controls. Moreover, elevated iron levels in the brain, as observed in post-mortem tissue and by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), correlated with accelerated cognitive decline in AD.93,94 In a biomarker study using the Alzheimer’s disease neuroimaging initiative cohort, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) ferritin levels were found to correlate with cognitive performance and predict the progression from mild cognitive impairment to AD, further supporting the role of iron in disease pathogenesis.95 Notably, treatments with iron chelators (deferoxamine and deferiprone) and antioxidants (ferrostatin-1) have been suggested as potential therapeutic strategies in AD.16,96 However, results from a recent phase 2 clinical trial demonstrated that deferiprone treatment was associated with accelerated cognitive decline and an increased risk of neutropenia in patients with early-stage AD.97 In addition to these ferroptosis-inhibiting agents, vitamin E is a potent regulator of ferroptosis, which it inhibits through mitigation of lipid peroxidation.98 Since 1997, research efforts have explored vitamin E, owing to its antioxidative and anti-inflammatory properties, as a potential AD therapy.99,100 Several studies have reported reduced circulating vitamin E levels in AD patients, supporting the hypothesis that vitamin E supplementation may confer therapeutic benefit. However, these findings remain inconsistent, as no clear correlation between AD and vitamin E levels has been observed across studies, and the clinical benefits of vitamin E supplementation in AD remain unreliable.100 Nevertheless, attempts to treat AD with vitamin E, especially in combination with other antioxidants, nutrients, or pharmaceuticals, are ongoing and may benefit from a deeper understanding of microglial ferroptosis.

The second most common form of dementia is vascular dementia, which occurs when the blood supply to the brain is obstructed. Vascular dementia may develop after a stroke, which is a common cerebrovascular disease with high mortality and disability rate. In the serum of patients with acute ischaemic stroke high ferritin levels correlate with worse clinical outcomes and increased severity scores.101,102 Similar to AD, levels of iron, lipid peroxidation and ferritin are increased in rodents modelling stroke-related brain injuries.103 Moreover, post-stroke treatment with a ferroptosis inhibitor (pharmacological selenium) appears to be neuroprotective and rescue brain function in mice.104 In addition, complications following intracerebral haemorrhage, which is a severe type of stroke, have been linked to iron-toxicity as resulting from the haemorrhagic event.105

In PD, both lipid peroxidation and elevated iron accumulation has been reported.30,106 Interestingly, region-specific differences regarding iron accumulation have been reported in early-stage PD (affecting substantia nigra and red nucleus) compared to middle-late-onset PD (affecting substantia nigra and the putamen).107-109 A study involving 240 patients with PD, stratified into four groups based on disease severity, identified oxidative stress-induced lipid peroxidation as a key factor in PD progression. Levels of lipid peroxidation products, including lipid hydroperoxides and malondialdehyde, were significantly elevated in plasma at more advanced stages of the disease.110 Following a similar rationale to that applied in AD, the antioxidant and anti-inflammatory properties of vitamin E have, since 1999, been considered potentially protective in PD as well. As observed in AD, the therapeutic effects of vitamin E appear variable in PD, with data suggesting that treatment initiation during presymptomatic disease stages may increase the likelihood of therapeutic benefits.111-114 In addition to vitamin E, FTH1, with its protective and anti-ferroptotic properties, has recently emerged as a therapeutic candidate in PD, where it regulates ferroptosis through ferritinophagy-related mechanisms.115

On a similar note, oxidative stress is markedly elevated in both symptomatic HD patients and asymptomatic gene carriers, and it is considered an early and prominent feature of HD.116,117 However, it remains unclear whether it plays a causal role in the disease or arises as a consequence of early pathological events.116 Further supporting the involvement of disrupted iron metabolism, increased ferritin accumulation within dystrophic microglia appears to be an early event in HD pathogenesis.118 Moreover, brains of R6/2 mice, modelling HD, exhibit abnormal levels of ferroptosis-related proteins. Notably, treatment with the iron chelator deferoxamine improved the motor phenotype in these mice.119

Extensive evidence from both ALS models and human biosamples identifies oxidative stress as a critical biological mechanism contributing to disease pathogenesis of ALS.120 Superoxide dismutase-1 (encoded by the SOD1 gene) is an antioxidant enzyme catalysing the breakdown of superoxide radicals, thereby mitigating oxidative stress. Mutations in the SOD1 gene are recognized as the second most prevalent genetic cause of ALS worldwide. While the underlying mechanisms remain incompletely understood, it is believed that these mutations lead to the formation of misfolded aggregates that contribute to neuronal toxicity and disease progression.121 In support of a role for iron dysregulation in this process, studies have reported significantly elevated serum ferritin levels in patients with ALS compared to healthy controls.122,123 In another study, plasma ferritin levels rose more rapidly in fast-progressing cases compared to slow-progressing ones, highlighting the potential of iron dysregulation in disease progression.124 Moreover, ferroptosis-related features have been linked to microglial activation in ALS models.125,126 In primary microglia, isolated from SOD1 mutant mice, the expression of system xc increased following microglial activation. Additionally, in post-mortem spinal cord tissues from ALS patients, system xc expression appears to correlate with the expression of CD68, a marker of activated microglia—further supporting the association between ferroptosis and microglial activation in ALS pathology.126

Growing evidence from MRI studies suggest increased accumulation of iron in individuals with clinically isolated syndrome, a condition that often precedes the onset of MS.127 Notably, iron-enriched microglia have been observed at the edges of chronic white matter lesions in post-mortem tissue from MS patients.128 Consistent with this finding, a separate study reported the presence of iron-laden reactive microglia, along with macrophages, in post-mortem brains of individuals diagnosed with MS.129 Further supporting the broader role of iron dysregulation in MS, CSF ferritin levels also appear to be elevated in MS patients compared to controls.130 In experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis (EAE) mice, a widely used animal model to study MS, increased iron levels and lipid peroxidation have been observed.131 Preclinical studies involving treatment with lipophilic radical trap compound UMAC-3203 have shown protective effects against early disease progression and a significant delay in relapse onset in EAE mice,132 suggesting it as a promising therapeutic target and further highlights the role of ferroptosis in MS pathogenesis.

Superficial siderosis of the CNS is a rare and often underdiagnosed disorder caused by chronic or recurrent bleeding within the subarachnoid space.133 This persistent bleeding leads to the accumulation of hemosiderin, an iron storage complex formed from ferritin degradation.134 Hemosiderin deposition is particularly harmful, as it progressively results in neurodegeneration.133 Notably, hemosiderin deposition has been linked to AD, with detectable accumulations specifically within glial cells.135,136 Microglia respond to haemorrhagic injury by upregulating haem oxygenase-1 (encoded by the HMOX1 gene) to degrade haem and sequester iron, as demonstrated both in animal models and human tissue.137,138

TBI, defined as a brain injury caused by external mechanical forces, is clinically classified based on severity into mild (concussion), moderate, or severe cases.139 BBB impairment and intracranial haemorrhage due to TBI may permit iron accumulation within the brain tissue, disrupt the iron homeostasis and ultimately contribute to neuronal cell death.140 Research using TBI mouse models has demonstrated elevated levels of iron-regulatory proteins, including TFR1, DMT1, GPX4, FPN, FTH1 and FTL, within brain tissue following injury.141,142 In human post-mortem brain tissue from individuals who died following stroke or TBI, iron accumulation and increased ferritin expression have been observed within lesioned areas. In the acute phase, these deposits of iron and ferritin are primarily localized within macrophages/microglia, while in chronic or older lesions, astrocytes exhibit ferritin overexpression.143 The apparent iron dyshomeostasis following TBI, together with recent findings linking TBI and neurodegenerative diseases, supports the hypothesis that iron dysregulation may play a critical role in potentiating neurodegeneration in TBI-related cases.144,145

Taken together, these findings highlight the complex and context-dependent role of iron in neurodegeneration and underscore the need for further investigation into how iron dysregulation contributes to pathological processes, including oxidative stress, cell death, as well as glia-mediated inflammation.

Ferroptosis and microglia

Microglia are the innate immune cells of the CNS, where they carry out essential functions related to immune surveillance and the maintenance of CNS homeostasis. In a non-activated state, microglia extend motile processes to continuously monitor the CNS environment.146,147 When encountering a disturbance such as apoptotic cell debris or other pathological challenges, microglia undergo morphological changes and adopt an activated phenotype. This activated state is characterized by an enhanced phagocytic and lysosomal activity, increased expression of activation receptors, as well as increased secretion of various molecules involved in immune response.146,148 It is critical to recognize that microglia are remarkably plastic cells, highly responsive to even slight changes within their environment. As a consequence, their phenotypic states shift significantly in a context- and time-dependent manner.

For phagocytes to fulfil their function and yet survive, careful regulation of iron metabolism, lipid peroxidation and thiol processes is required.149 The cytosolic levels of iron-storage protein ferritin differ between cell types and change according to the demand of iron. In the brain, microglia are the cell type with highest levels of cytosolic ferritin, which is likely to reflect the large iron-storage capacity in microglia.14,150 In line with this, microglia retain more iron than neurones in conditions of iron overload.22 However, a long-term accumulation of iron is likely to cause cellular stress, which might explain the reported association between ferritin and dystrophic microglia.24,118

In post-mortem AD tissue, iron-laden microglia were commonly observed near Aβ plaques.151,152 The intracellular iron was primarily localized in rounded microglia with dilated cell-branches, morphologically identified as activated microglia. Less frequently, iron accumulation was also detected in microglia located further from Aβ plaques, while no iron deposition was observed near neurofibrillary tangles.151 Similarly, in secondary progressive MS (SPMS) autopsy samples, ferritin-positive microglia, indicative of high intracellular iron content, clustered around SPMS lesions. These ferritin-positive cells co-localized with CD68, demonstrating an activated phenotype of the iron-laden microglia near SPMS lesions.131 Moreover, increasing evidence from various studies has linked ferroptosis-related characteristics with microglial activation in both HD and ALS.118,125,126 Notably, primary microglia exposed to ferroptosis-conditioned media demonstrated increased messenger RNA (mRNA) expression and protein secretion of proinflammatory cytokines, including TNFα, IL-6 and IL-1β.153

Taken together, both ferroptosis and lipid peroxidation are features of specific microglial activation states observed in various neurological disorders. As a result, microglial ferroptosis has emerged as a promising therapeutic target for modulating neuroinflammation.154 Here, we introduce the concepts of ferroptosis and lipid peroxidation as distinct features of microglial activation, and we present a manually compiled list of ferroptosis-relevant proteins and genes, along with a multidata comparison that supports this framework and identifies novel biomarker candidates for a microglia-derived ferroptosis signature.

Ferroptosis list 2025—a complement to traditional pathway analysis

Prior to conducting the multidata comparison, we manually compiled a list of 120 ferroptosis-relevant entries, referred to as Ferroptosis List 2025 (Supplementary table 1, Fig. 2). This process began with a comprehensive literature review to identify ferroptosis-related pathways, which were subsequently consolidated into a single unified overview (Fig. 1). When comparing our manually curated list with the current KEGG pathway for ferroptosis (KEGG, https://www.genome.jp/entry/pathway+hsa04216; 28 November 2025) we identified 78 entries that are not included the KEGG pathway (Fig. 2). To address microglial relevance, a targeted literature search was conducted for each of the 120 entries in our list (via PubMed, search criteria: [gene name] + ‘microglia’; 17 June 2025) and found supporting references for 91 entries (Supplementary table 1).

Multidata comparison: ferroptosis-related changes identified in activated microglia

In this multidata study, we utilized data from three distinct studies, covering the microglia transcriptome and proteome across four different mouse models: 5xFAD,9  Grn ko mice,10 APP/PS111 and APP-KI.11 All studies were conducted independently, with analytical and technical details provided in the respective original publications. As this review includes multidata comparisons, no new data were generated and no additional statistical analyses were performed. To our knowledge, none of the original studies accounted for potential sex differences; therefore, this factor was not considered in our multidata comparison. In brief, microglia from the 5xFAD model were isolated and analysed using transcriptional single-cell sorting,9 whereas microglia from Grn ko, APP/PS1 and APP-KI mice were isolated by magnetic-activated cell sorting and subjected to discovery proteomic analysis using mass spectrometry.10,11 These data were selected based on their confirmed microglial activation profiles and the availability of the data.

First identified through single-cell RNA sequencing in the 5xFAD mouse model, the so-called disease-associated microglia (DAM) signature9 has become a widely recognized framework for describing microglial activation. The 5xFAD, APP/PS1, and APP-KI mice all serve as models for amyloid pathology, which is a well-known trigger for microglial activation. In 5xFAD mice, amyloid aggregations are detectable as early as 1.5 months of age,155 which closely parallels observations in the APP/PS1 mice,156 while APP-KI mice exhibit amyloid aggregation around 2 months of age.157 In these amyloid-burden models, microglial activation is initiated extracellularly by external stimuli (accumulation of toxic amyloid species), whereas in Grn ko mice, microglial activation arises internally due to intracellular stress as induced by lysosomal impairment.158,159 In addition to the data obtained from mice, this comparison includes data from GRN ko human induced pluripotent stem cell-derived microglia (hiMG) (Supplementary Fig. 1).10

We compared significant alterations (P-value < 0.05, excluding values with no assigned gene name) identified in these datasets with our manually compiled list of 120 ferroptosis-relevant proteins (Fig. 2, Supplementary table 1), which revealed several ferroptosis-relevant changes in activated microglia (Fig. 3, Supplementary Fig. 2). Notably, FTH1, a key component of the iron storage complex ferritin, was consistently increased in microglia across all models. Additionally, microglial levels of ferroportin (SLC40A1) and PCBP2, both critical for intracellular iron export, exhibited significant alterations in most datasets (Fig. 3)—further highlighting ferroptosis as an important feature of microglial activation.

Figure 3.

For image description, please refer to the figure legend and surrounding text.

Ferroptosis-associated biomolecules are significantly altered in activated microglia. (A) Significantly altered levels of ferroptosis-relevant genes and proteins in microglia isolated from models using various means of activation. ‘5xFAD (DAM)’ depicts significant changes of the microglial transcriptome, while ‘12 months Grn ko’ and ‘GRN ko hiMG’ depict significant changes of the microglial cell proteome. Arrows indicate the direction of change. ‘1–12 months APP/PS1’ and ‘1–12 months APP-KI’ represent summaries of significantly changed proteins, in microglia, at four different ages of the respective mouse model. (B) Significantly altered levels of ferroptosis-associated proteins in microglia isolated from APP/PS1 mice and APP-KI mice at ages 1, 3, 6 and 12 months. Arrows indicate the direction of change.

Other notable changes include autophagy-related gene 5 and 7 (ATG5 and ATG7, respectively), which were significantly increased in all proteomics-based datasets. Specifically, ATG5 and ATG7 were elevated in Grn ko mice, APP/PS1 mice and APP-KI mice, whereas only ATG7 was altered in GRN ko hiMG (Fig. 3A). Interestingly, in the amyloid-burden mice, these proteins were significantly upregulated following amyloid deposition at 6 and 12 months (Fig. 3B). Peroxiredoxin-6 (encoded by the PRDX6 gene), which counteracts lipid peroxidation,160,161 was significantly changed in microglia isolated from all amyloid models (5xFAD, APP/PS1 and APP-KI) (Fig. 3A).

Potential biomarker candidates for the evaluation of ferroptosis in the context of neurodegenerative diseases and glial activation

The final phase of our multidata comparison incorporated three additional proteomic datasets: CSF from A30P-αS (α-synuclein burden mice with confirmed glial activation), CSF from Grn ko mice and conditioned media from GRN ko hiMG.10,12 To investigate the potential of ferroptosis-associated biomarkers, we compared the proteins with significantly altered levels in these fluids to our manually compiled list of 120 ferroptosis-relevant proteins and genes. In the CSF of A30P-αS mice, six proteins overlapped with our ferroptosis list: PLA2G7, CP, TF, GPX3, HSPA5 and QSOX1. Notably, all six of these proteins showed a significant increase in the CSF of A30P-αS mice compared to control mice (Fig. 4). In the CSF of Grn ko mice, only two proteins, CP and HSPB1 aligned with our ferroptosis list, while in the conditioned media of activated hiMG 24 proteins overlapped with our ferroptosis list (Fig. 4). This demonstrates that the detectability of ferroptosis-related proteins in biofluids is possible, and that the levels of these extracellularly detectable ferroptosis proteins are significantly altered following microglial activation (Fig. 4). Among the changes detectable in hiMG media, the levels of ferritin, in the form of both FTH1 and FTL, were significantly increased. Extracellular levels of PLA2G7 were also significantly elevated in the media of activated hiMG, which matches the observed PLA2G7 elevation in CSF of A30P-αS mice (Fig. 4).

Figure 4.

For image description, please refer to the figure legend and surrounding text.

Ferroptosis-relevant proteins in biofluids of models with confirmed glial activation. Significantly altered levels of ferroptosis-relevant proteins in biofluids of models with confirmed glial activation: CSF from 18 months old A30P-αS mice, CSF from 12 months old Grn ko mice and media from GRN ko hiMG. Arrows indicate the direction of change.

Discussion

Microglial activation is increasingly recognized as a spectrum of states, rather than following a binary classification such as ‘resting’ versus ‘activated’, ‘M1’ versus ‘M2’, or ‘homeostatic’ versus ‘DAM’. This shift towards a more nuanced nomenclature reflects the complexity and dynamics of microglial activation.162 As a result, it is improbable that a single marker would suffice for accurately assessing microglial activation, emphasizing the need for a comprehensive panel of biomarkers.

In this review, we introduce ferroptosis and lipid peroxidation as features of microglial activation that should be considered when phenotyping microglia. Given the relatively recent discovery of ferroptosis,4 it is often underrepresented in pathway databases, limiting its recognition in comparison to broader and more established pathways. To bridge this gap, we compiled a list of 120 ferroptosis-relevant proteins and genes (Supplementary table 1), which includes over twice as many entries as the current KEGG pathway for ferroptosis (Fig. 2). Our list is available to the scientific community to facilitate deeper investigation into ferroptosis-related findings from transcriptomic and proteomic data. However, it is important to emphasize that this list, like any other pathway resource, should be regarded as a tool rather than a definitive result. Any significant overlaps with our ferroptosis list or widely accepted pathway databases should be interpreted thoughtfully, with careful reasoning to contextualize their biological relevance.

For our multidata comparison, we used our Ferroptosis List 2025 to investigate the presence of ferroptosis and lipid peroxidation in the context of microglial activation. Comparing our list to datasets of activated microglia, we consistently identified ferritin, detected as either FTH1 or FTL, across all models (Fig. 3). As the primary intracellular storage protein, the increased ferritin levels provide compelling evidence that iron homeostasis is altered in activated microglia, independent of the specific activation trigger, which is likely to affect ferroptotic pathways. Given that microglia are exhibit the highest ferritin expression within the brain,14 we propose that CSF ferritin levels, previously associated with neurological disorders such as AD,163 may serve as a biomarker for a specific form of microglial activation. The increased levels of FTL and FTH1 likely reflect an adaptive cellular response aimed at mitigating iron-induced oxidative stress rather than serving as a driver of ferroptosis. Notably, the secreted levels of FTH1 or FTL increased with microglial activation in vitro, but not in the CSF of Grn ko mice (Fig. 4). These findings suggest that the release of microglia-derived ferritin, as represented by either FTL or FTH1, increases with microglial activation, a process that may differ between mouse and human as well as over time, as observed in microglia isolated from APP/PS1 and AAP-KI mice (Fig. 3B). Thus, further studies are required to confirm this hypothesis and clarify its broader implications.

Consistently altered in microglia of all mouse models we found ferroportin (SLC40A1), which is a key mediator of iron export. Interestingly, while ferroportin levels were increased in proteomic datasets, transcriptomic data showed a significant reduction in its expression (Fig. 3A). This discrepancy is in line with the complex regulation of ferroportin, which is regulated by multiple mechanisms at the levels of mRNA, post-transcriptional processing and post-translational modification.164 The consistent increase of the ferroportin protein, together with the observed increase of ferritin, might suggest that microglia in these models adopt an iron recycling-exporting phenotype, as previously reported in macrophages stimulated with M-CSF, IL-4 or glucocorticoids.165 In the amyloid mouse models, the protein levels of ferroportin became significantly elevated only after 6 months. This suggests that its involvement may be part of a more sustained activation profile rather than an immediate response, which aligns with the hypothesis that ferritin and ferroportin function cooperatively in response to iron-induced oxidative stress. Notably, no significant changes in ferroportin were observed in the cell lysate or conditioned media of hiMG (Fig. 3A and Fig. 4, respectively). The divergence between mouse and hiMG data may reflect species-specific differences, in vivo versus in vitro effects, or the inherently dynamic nature of microglial activation and ferroptosis, both of which are likely to be influenced by microglial age and activation stage. Moreover, given the high plasticity of microglia, the type of stimulus (inflammatory, metabolic or proteotoxic), its origin (i.e. exogenous versus endogenous) and its duration are all known determinants of the microglial activation signature and are therefore very likely to also affect the ferroptosis profile within these cells.

In addition to ferritin and ferroportin, significant increases in ATG5 and ATG7 were observed in activated microglia datasets (Fig. 3), potentially linking microglial activation to lipid peroxidation. Both ATG5 and ATG7 are essential for autophagosome formation, which may promote lipid metabolism and enhance the availability of lipid substrates for peroxidation, which sequentially leads to an increased susceptibility to ferroptosis (Fig. 1).21 Although the increased levels of ATG5 and ATG7 might indicate an increased susceptibility of ferroptosis, it cannot be concluded that cells exhibiting elevated ATG5/ATG7 levels actually undergo ferroptosis. In the amyloid mouse models, the levels of ATG5 and ATG7 were significantly increased only after 6 months, suggesting that these proteins, similarly to ferroportin, are associated with a sustained activation profile of microglia. Taken together, these findings highlight the critical need to investigate the role of iron homeostasis and lipid peroxidation, particularly the levels of FTH1, FTL, FPN, ATG5 and ATG7, in the context of sustained microglial activation.

Finally, we applied our ferroptosis list as a tool to explore potential biomarkers indicative of microglial activation features associated with ferroptosis and lipid peroxidation. Although the idea of fluid-based biomarkers for assessing iron homeostasis is not novel, the exploration of biomarkers specifically related to microglial ferroptosis has not, to our knowledge, been previously investigated. We identified ferroptosis-related changes in the fluids of all three models: CSF from 18 months old A30P-αS mice, CSF from 12 months old Grn ko mice and media from GRN ko hiMG (Fig. 4), with the most pronounced effects observed in the media of activated hiMG, where 24 significantly altered proteins overlapped with our ferroptosis list. Notably, we observed a significant increase in ferritin (both FTL and FTH1) in the conditioned media of activated hiMG (Fig. 4), which aligns with the elevated levels observed in the cell lysate of these cells (Fig. 3A). This highlights ferritin as a promising fluid-based proxy biomarker, suggesting elevated extracellular ferritin levels reflect increased intracellular protein expression. Although microglia are the cell type in the brain with the most abundant ferritin expression,150 additional studies are necessary to validate whether CSF ferritin reliably reflects microglial activation, given that this protein is also expressed by other cell types in the brain. Furthermore, FTH1 levels did not reach statistical significance in the CSF of A30P-αS nor in the CSF of Grn ko mice, and FTL was not detected in either of these datasets. This underscores the need for further investigation into ferritin biology in terms of (i) mouse-human translatability and (ii) differences in turnover dynamics between media from monocultured microglia versus CSF. In addition to ferritin, levels of PLA2G7 were significantly increased in both A30P-αS CSF and GRN ko media. Besides its association to ferroptosis, PLA2G7 has been reported to exert proinflammatory functions, via the NLRP3 inflammasome, in macrophages.166 ATG7 was significantly increased in the media of activated hiMG, positioning it as another promising candidate for a fluid-based proxy biomarker. Although not significantly altered in the media of hiMG, CP remains of interest for future investigation, as it is significantly increased in the CSF of both mouse models (Fig. 4). In the absence of a clear association with microglial activation, the elevated CP levels in mouse CSF are likely attributable to activated astrocytes.167 Although the cellular origin of CP remains unclear, the observed extracellular increase in CP likely reflects an anti-ferroptotic response to iron dyshomeostasis, ferroptosis, or a combination of both. CP exerts anti-ferroptotic effects through iron binding and by converting Fe2+ to Fe3+ without generating reactive oxygen species.67,68 Interestingly, CP also has the capacity to bind copper, thereby introducing considerations of copper homeostasis and highlighting the importance of future CP-focused studies to investigate ferroptosis and cuproptosis in parallel.168

Collectively, FTH1, FTL1 and ATG7 (with ATG5 and CP as additional potential candidates) constitute novel, albeit preliminary, fluid-based biomarkers candidates that may, upon further investigation, prove useful in evaluating specific microglial activation profiles related to ferroptosis.

Species-specific differences and the inherent distinction between in vitro monoculture media and in vivo CSF should be considered when interpreting these findings. In vivo, CSF proteins are subjected to clearance, cellular uptake and receptor-mediated interactions across diverse cell types, whereas in vitro protein turnover is limited to processes governed solely by the cultured cells, without the influence of systemic or multicellular factors present in the physiological environment. With notable opposing directionality of change, as observed for some of the proteins, their extracellular functions, with respect to the context and environment in which they are present, remain speculative. Nevertheless, the detection of ferroptosis-relevant proteins in the extracellular environment, with significant changes associated with microglial activation, supports the potential of fluid-based biomarkers for monitoring microglial ferroptosis.

The objectives of this review were to provide a comprehensive overview of ferroptosis mechanisms, present an updated list of ferroptosis-relevant proteins and genes and highlight intra- and extracellular ferroptosis-related changes (both pro- and anti-ferroptotic) associated with microglial activation. Of note, the intended purpose of our multidata comparison was to investigate any potential presence of ferroptosis-related changes, intracellularly and extracellularly, in the context of microglial activation. The datasets used for comparison were selected according to the criteria of (i) confirmed glial activation and (ii) the availability of discovery proteomic or transcriptomic data. Unfortunately, publicly available fluid proteomic data from models with confirmed glial activation are very rare and nearly non-existent for in vivo models, due to the technically demanding sampling of CSF from animals. It is important to keep in mind that none of the studies from which the data was obtained were designed to study ferroptosis, which may contribute to the variability observed across models. Additionally, the potential presence of other cell death modalities has not been addressed in these studies. As a result, the potential influence of alternative cell death pathways (e.g. apoptosis, necroptosis, pyroptosis, or cuproptosis) cannot be ruled out by our multidata comparison. Given these limitations, this review aims to encourage renewed attention to ferroptosis within microglia and neuroimmunology research, where further studies are critically needed to delineate the complex and dynamic interplay between ferroptosis and microglial activation.

Supplementary Material

fcag109_Supplementary_Data

Contributor Information

Ida Pesämaa, Department of Psychiatry and Neurochemistry, Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, the Sahlgrenska Academy at the University of Gothenburg, Gothenberg 413 45, Sweden.

Srinivas Koutarapu, Department of Pathology and Immunology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO 63110, USA.

Henrik Zetterberg, Department of Psychiatry and Neurochemistry, Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, the Sahlgrenska Academy at the University of Gothenburg, Gothenberg 413 45, Sweden; Clinical Neurochemistry Laboratory, Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Mölndal 431 80, Sweden; Department of Neurodegenerative Disease, University College London (UCL) Institute of Neurology, London WC1N 3BG, UK; UK Dementia Research Institute at University College London, London NW1 3BT, UK; Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI 53705, USA; Wisconsin Alzheimer’s Disease Research Center, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI 53792, USA.

Stefanie Fruhwürth, Department of Psychiatry and Neurochemistry, Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, the Sahlgrenska Academy at the University of Gothenburg, Gothenberg 413 45, Sweden.

Supplementary material

Supplementary material is available at Brain Communications online.

Funding

H.Z. is a Wallenberg Scholar and a Distinguished Professor at the Swedish Research Council supported by grants from the Swedish Research Council (#2023-00356, #2022-01018 and #2019-02397), the European Union’s Horizon Europe research and innovation programme under grant agreement No 101053962, Swedish State Support for Clinical Research (#ALFGBG-71320), the Alzheimer Drug Discovery Foundation (ADDF), USA (#201809-2016862), the AD Strategic Fund and the Alzheimer's Association (#ADSF-21-831376-C, #ADSF-21-831381-C, #ADSF-21-831377-C and #ADSF-24-1284328-C), the European Partnership on Metrology, co-financed from the European Union’s Horizon Europe Research and Innovation Programme and by the Participating States (NEuroBioStand, #22HLT07), the Bluefield Project, Cure Alzheimer’s Fund, the Olav Thon Foundation, the Erling-Persson Family Foundation, Familjen Rönströms Stiftelse, Stiftelsen för Gamla Tjänarinnor, Hjärnfonden, Sweden (#FO2022-0270), the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under the Marie Skłodowska-Curie grant agreement No 860197 (MIRIADE), the European Union Joint Programme—Neurodegenerative Disease Research (JPND2021-00694), the National Institute for Health and Care Research University College London Hospitals Biomedical Research Centre and the UK Dementia Research Institute at UCL (UKDRI-1003).

Competing interests

HZ has served at scientific advisory boards and/or as a consultant for Abbvie, Acumen, Alector, Alzinova, ALZpath, Amylyx, Annexon, Apellis, Artery Therapeutics, AZTherapies, Cognito Therapeutics, CogRx, Denali, Eisai, LabCorp, Merry Life, Nervgen, Novo Nordisk, Optoceutics, Passage Bio, Pinteon Therapeutics, Prothena, Quanterix, Red Abbey Labs, reMYND, Roche, Samumed, Siemens Healthineers, Triplet Therapeutics and Wave, has given lectures sponsored by Alzecure, BioArctic, Biogen, Cellectricon, Fujirebio, Lilly, Novo Nordisk, Roche and WebMD, and is a co-founder of Brain Biomarker Solutions in Gothenburg AB, which is a part of the GU Ventures Incubator Programme (outside submitted work).

Data availability

Data sharing is not applicable to this article as no new data were created or analysed in this study. All data utilized for this review are included in the following published articles and their respective supplementary information files: Pesämaa et al. 2023 (doi:10.1186/s13024-023-00657-w), Sebastian Monasor, Müller et al. 2020 (doi:10.7554/eLife.54083), Eninger et al. 2022 (doi:10.1073/pnas.2119804119). Additionally, our manually curated list of ferroptosis-relevant entries is available as Supplementary Table 1. Graphs and illustrations were designed and generated using Adobe Illustrator 2024, Microsoft Excel (version 16.96.1) and DeepVenn (Tim Hulsen 2020). A list of abbreviations is included in Supplementary Table 2.

References

  • 1. Shen  S, Shao  Y, Li  C. Different types of cell death and their shift in shaping disease. Cell Death Discov. 2023;9(1):284. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Ye  K, Chen  Z, Xu  Y. The double-edged functions of necroptosis. Cell Death Dis. 2023;14(2):163. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Newton  K, Strasser  A, Kayagaki  N, Dixit  VM. Cell death. Cell. 2024;187(2):235–256. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Dixon  SJ, Lemberg  KM, Lamprecht  MR, et al.  Ferroptosis: An iron-dependent form of nonapoptotic cell death. Cell. 2012;149(5):1060–1072. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Sun  Y, Chen  P, Zhai  B, et al.  The emerging role of ferroptosis in inflammation. Biomed Pharmacother. 2020;127:110108. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Chen  Y, Fang  ZM, Yi  X, Wei  X, Jiang  DS. The interaction between ferroptosis and inflammatory signaling pathways. Cell Death Dis. 2023;14(3):205. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Lee  E, Song  CH, Bae  SJ, Ha  KT, Karki  R. Regulated cell death pathways and their roles in homeostasis, infection, inflammation, and tumorigenesis. Exp Mol Med. 2023;55(8):1632–1643. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Roeck  BF, Lotfipour Nasudivar  S, Vorndran  MRH, et al.  Ferroptosis spreads to neighboring cells via plasma membrane contacts. Nat Commun. 2025;16(1):2951. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Keren-Shaul  H, Spinrad  A, Weiner  A, et al.  A unique microglia type associated with restricting development of Alzheimer's disease. Cell. 2017;169(7):1276–1290.e17. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Pesamaa  I, Muller  SA, Robinson  S, et al.  A microglial activity state biomarker panel differentiates FTD-granulin and Alzheimer's disease patients from controls. Mol Neurodegener. 2023;18(1):70. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Sebastian Monasor  L, Muller  SA, Colombo  AV, et al.  Fibrillar Abeta triggers microglial proteome alterations and dysfunction in Alzheimer mouse models. Elife. 2020;9:e54083. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Eninger  T, Muller  SA, Bacioglu  M, et al.  Signatures of glial activity can be detected in the CSF proteome. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2022;119(24):e2119804119. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Madsen  E, Gitlin  JD. Copper and iron disorders of the brain. Annu Rev Neurosci. 2007;30:317–337. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Levi  S, Ripamonti  M, Moro  AS, Cozzi  A. Iron imbalance in neurodegeneration. Mol Psychiatry  2024;29(4):1139–1152. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Salvador  GA. Iron in neuronal function and dysfunction. Biofactors. 2010;36(2):103–110. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Wang  F, Wang  J, Shen  Y, Li  H, Rausch  WD, Huang  X. Iron dyshomeostasis and ferroptosis: A new Alzheimer's Disease hypothesis?  Front Aging Neurosci. 2022;14:830569. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. McCarthy  RC, Sosa  JC, Gardeck  AM, Baez  AS, Lee  CH, Wessling-Resnick  M. Inflammation-induced iron transport and metabolism by brain microglia. J Biol Chem. 2018;293(20):7853–7863. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Shi  Z, Zhang  L, Zheng  J, Sun  H, Shao  C. Ferroptosis: Biochemistry and biology in cancers. Front Oncol. 2021;11:579286. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Xin  S, Mueller  C, Pfeiffer  S, et al.  MS4A15 drives ferroptosis resistance through calcium-restricted lipid remodeling. Cell Death Differ.  2022;29(3):670–686. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Chen  X, Kang  R, Kroemer  G, Tang  D. Ferroptosis in infection, inflammation, and immunity. J Exp Med. 2021;218(6):e20210518. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Tang  D, Chen  X, Kang  R, Kroemer  G. Ferroptosis: Molecular mechanisms and health implications. Cell Res. 2021;31(2):107–125. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Bishop  GM, Dang  TN, Dringen  R, Robinson  SR. Accumulation of non-transferrin-bound iron by neurons, astrocytes, and microglia. Neurotox Res. 2011;19(3):443–451. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Song  N, Wang  J, Jiang  H, Xie  J. Astroglial and microglial contributions to iron metabolism disturbance in Parkinson's disease. Biochim Biophys Acta Mol Basis Dis  2018;1864(3):967–973. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Kenkhuis  B, Somarakis  A, de Haan  L, et al.  Iron loading is a prominent feature of activated microglia in Alzheimer’s disease patients. Acta Neuropathol Commun.  2021;9(1):27. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Kenkhuis  B, van Eekeren  M, Parfitt  DA, et al.  Iron accumulation induces oxidative stress, while depressing inflammatory polarization in human iPSC-derived microglia. Stem Cell Reports. 2022;17(6):1351–1365. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26. Ryan  SK, Zelic  M, Han  Y, et al.  Microglia ferroptosis is regulated by SEC24B and contributes to neurodegeneration. Nat Neurosci. 2023;26(1):12–26. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27. Wang  L, Wang  Y, Wu  M, et al.  Minocycline alleviates microglia ferroptosis by inhibiting HO-1 during cerebral ischemia-reperfusion injury. Inflamm Res. 2024;73(10):1727–1745. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28. Liu  YJ, Jia  GR, Zhang  SH, et al.  The role of microglia in neurodegenerative diseases: From the perspective of ferroptosis. Acta Pharmacol Sin. 2025;46(11):2877–2892. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29. Feng  H, Schorpp  K, Jin  J, et al.  Transferrin receptor is a specific ferroptosis marker. Cell Rep. 2020;30(10):3411–3423.e7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30. Zheng  J, Conrad  M. The metabolic underpinnings of ferroptosis. Cell Metab. 2020;32(6):920–937. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31. De Domenico  I, McVey Ward  D, Kaplan  J. Regulation of iron acquisition and storage: Consequences for iron-linked disorders. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2008;9(1):72–81. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32. Conner  SD, Schmid  SL. Regulated portals of entry into the cell. Nature. 2003;422(6927):37–44. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33. Sfera  A, Gradini  R, Cummings  M, Diaz  E, Price  AI, Osorio  C. Rusty microglia: Trainers of innate immunity in Alzheimer's Disease. Front Neurol. 2018;9:1062. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34. Kadry  H, Noorani  B, Cucullo  L. A blood-brain barrier overview on structure, function, impairment, and biomarkers of integrity. Fluids Barriers CNS. 2020;17(1):69. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35. Sorets  AG, Rosch  JC, Duvall  CL, Lippmann  ES. Caveolae-mediated transport at the injured blood-brain barrier as an underexplored pathway for central nervous system drug delivery. Curr Opin Chem Eng. 2020;30:86–95. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36. Ru  Q, Li  Y, Chen  L, Wu  Y, Min  J, Wang  F. Iron homeostasis and ferroptosis in human diseases: Mechanisms and therapeutic prospects. Signal Transduct Target Ther. 2024;9(1):271. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37. You  L, Yu  PP, Dong  T, et al.  Astrocyte-derived hepcidin controls iron traffic at the blood-brain-barrier via regulating ferroportin 1 of microvascular endothelial cells. Cell Death Dis. 2022;13(8):667. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38. Zhang  X, Gou  YJ, Zhang  Y, et al.  Hepcidin overexpression in astrocytes alters brain iron metabolism and protects against amyloid-beta induced brain damage in mice. Cell Death Discov. 2020;6(1):113. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39. Andrews  NC. The iron transporter DMT1. Int J Biochem Cell Biol. 1999;31(10):991–994. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40. Ohgami  RS, Campagna  DR, Greer  EL, et al.  Identification of a ferrireductase required for efficient transferrin-dependent iron uptake in erythroid cells. Nat Genet. 2005;37(11):1264–1269. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41. Zhang  XD, Liu  ZY, Wang  MS, et al.  Mechanisms and regulations of ferroptosis. Front Immunol. 2023;14:1269451. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42. Chen  X, Yu  C, Kang  R, Tang  D. Iron metabolism in ferroptosis. Front Cell Dev Biol. 2020;8:590226. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43. Chen  X, Li  J, Kang  R, Klionsky  DJ, Tang  D. Ferroptosis: Machinery and regulation. Autophagy. 2021;17(9):2054–2081. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44. Crielaard  BJ, Lammers  T, Rivella  S. Targeting iron metabolism in drug discovery and delivery. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2017;16(6):400–423. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45. Wang  CY, Jenkitkasemwong  S, Duarte  S, et al.  ZIP8 is an iron and zinc transporter whose cell-surface expression is up-regulated by cellular iron loading. J Biol Chem. 2012;287(41):34032–34043. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46. Zhao  N, Gao  J, Enns  CA, Knutson  MD. ZRT/IRT-like protein 14 (ZIP14) promotes the cellular assimilation of iron from transferrin. J Biol Chem. 2010;285(42):32141–32150. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47. Chen  PH, Wu  J, Xu  Y, et al.  Zinc transporter ZIP7 is a novel determinant of ferroptosis. Cell Death Dis. 2021;12(2):198. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48. Ke  K, Li  L, Lu  C, et al.  The crosstalk effect between ferrous and other ions metabolism in ferroptosis for therapy of cancer. Front Oncol. 2022;12:916082. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49. Feng  S, Tang  D, Wang  Y, et al.  The mechanism of ferroptosis and its related diseases. Mol Biomed. 2023;4(1):33. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50. Wang  M, Tang  G, Zhou  C, et al.  Revisiting the intersection of microglial activation and neuroinflammation in Alzheimer's disease from the perspective of ferroptosis. Chem Biol Interact. 2023;375:110387. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51. Endale  HT, Tesfaye  W, Mengstie  TA. ROS induced lipid peroxidation and their role in ferroptosis. Front Cell Dev Biol. 2023;11:1226044. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52. Veeckmans  G, Van San  E, Vanden Berghe  T. A guide to ferroptosis, the biological rust of cellular membranes. FEBS J. 2024;291(13):2767–2783. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53. Lee  JY, Kim  WK, Bae  KH, Lee  SC, Lee  EW. Lipid metabolism and ferroptosis. Biology (Basel). 2021;10(3):184. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54. Yang  WS, Kim  KJ, Gaschler  MM, Patel  M, Shchepinov  MS, Stockwell  BR. Peroxidation of polyunsaturated fatty acids by lipoxygenases drives ferroptosis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2016;113(34):E4966–E4975. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55. Venkatesh  D, O'Brien  NA, Zandkarimi  F, et al.  MDM2 and MDMX promote ferroptosis by PPARalpha-mediated lipid remodeling. Genes Dev. 2020;34(7–8):526–543. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56. Kagan  VE, Mao  G, Qu  F, et al.  Oxidized arachidonic and adrenic PEs navigate cells to ferroptosis. Nat Chem Biol. 2017;13(1):81–90. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57. Miess  H, Dankworth  B, Gouw  AM, et al.  The glutathione redox system is essential to prevent ferroptosis caused by impaired lipid metabolism in clear cell renal cell carcinoma. Oncogene. 2018;37(40):5435–5450. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58. Stockwell  BR, Jiang  X, Gu  W. Emerging mechanisms and disease relevance of ferroptosis. Trends Cell Biol. 2020;30(6):478–490. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59. Magtanong  L, Ko  PJ, To  M, et al.  Exogenous monounsaturated fatty acids promote a ferroptosis-resistant cell state. Cell Chem Biol. 2019;26(3):420–432.e9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60. Hadian  K, Stockwell  BR. SnapShot: Ferroptosis. Cell. 2020;181(5):1188–1188.e1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61. Huang  F, Yang  R, Xiao  Z, et al.  Targeting ferroptosis to treat cardiovascular diseases: A new continent to be explored. Front Cell Dev Biol. 2021;9:737971. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62. Wang  YQ, Chang  SY, Wu  Q, et al.  The protective role of mitochondrial ferritin on erastin-induced ferroptosis. Front Aging Neurosci. 2016;8:308. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63. Sun  K, Li  C, Liao  S, et al.  Ferritinophagy, a form of autophagic ferroptosis: New insights into cancer treatment. Front Pharmacol. 2022;13:1043344. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64. Zhu  Y, Fujimaki  M, Rubinsztein  DC. Autophagy-dependent versus autophagy-independent ferroptosis. Trends Cell Biol. 2025;35(9):745–760. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65. Rishi  G, Huang  G, Subramaniam  VN. Cancer: The role of iron and ferroptosis. Int J Biochem Cell Biol. 2021;141:106094. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66. Yanatori  I, Yasui  Y, Tabuchi  M, Kishi  F. Chaperone protein involved in transmembrane transport of iron. Biochem J. 2014;462(1):25–37. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67. Hochstrasser  H, Tomiuk  J, Walter  U, et al.  Functional relevance of ceruloplasmin mutations in Parkinson's disease. FASEB J. 2005;19(13):1851–1853. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68. Shang  Y, Luo  M, Yao  F, Wang  S, Yuan  Z, Yang  Y. Ceruloplasmin suppresses ferroptosis by regulating iron homeostasis in hepatocellular carcinoma cells. Cell Signal. 2020;72:109633. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69. Sun  X, Ou  Z, Xie  M, et al.  HSPB1 as a novel regulator of ferroptotic cancer cell death. Oncogene. 2015;34(45):5617–5625. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70. Kim  JW, Lee  JY, Oh  M, Lee  EW. An integrated view of lipid metabolism in ferroptosis revisited via lipidomic analysis. Exp Mol Med. 2023;55(8):1620–1631. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71. Parker  JL, Deme  JC, Kolokouris  D, et al.  Molecular basis for redox control by the human cystine/glutamate antiporter system xc. Nat Commun. 2021;12(1):7147. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72. Li  FJ, Long  HZ, Zhou  ZW, Luo  HY, Xu  SG, Gao  LC. System X(c) (-)/GSH/GPX4 axis: An important antioxidant system for the ferroptosis in drug-resistant solid tumor therapy. Front Pharmacol. 2022;13:910292. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73. Kang  YP, Mockabee-Macias  A, Jiang  C, et al.  Non-canonical glutamate-cysteine ligase activity protects against ferroptosis. Cell Metab. 2021;33(1):174–189.e7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74. Sun  S, Shen  J, Jiang  J, Wang  F, Min  J. Targeting ferroptosis opens new avenues for the development of novel therapeutics. Signal Transduct Target Ther. 2023;8(1):372. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75. Wu  J, Minikes  AM, Gao  M, et al.  Intercellular interaction dictates cancer cell ferroptosis via NF2-YAP signalling. Nature. 2019;572(7769):402–406. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76. Baird  L, Yamamoto  M. The molecular mechanisms regulating the KEAP1-NRF2 pathway. Mol Cell Biol  2020;40(13):e00099-20. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77. Kansanen  E, Kuosmanen  SM, Leinonen  H, Levonen  AL. The Keap1-Nrf2 pathway: Mechanisms of activation and dysregulation in cancer. Redox Biol. 2013;1(1):45–49. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78. Porter  JL, Rawla  P. Hemochromatosis. StatPearls; 2024. [Google Scholar]
  • 79. Giannetti  AM, Bjorkman  PJ. HFE and transferrin directly compete for transferrin receptor in solution and at the cell surface. J Biol Chem. 2004;279(24):25866–25875. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80. Loughnan  R, Ahern  J, Tompkins  C, et al.  Association of genetic variant linked to hemochromatosis with brain magnetic resonance imaging measures of iron and movement disorders. JAMA Neurol. 2022;79(9):919–928. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81. Costello  DJ, Walsh  SL, Harrington  HJ, Walsh  CH. Concurrent hereditary haemochromatosis and idiopathic Parkinson's disease: A case report series. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2004;75(4):631–633. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82. Miyajima  H, Hosoi  Y. Aceruloplasminemia. In: Adam  MP, Feldman  J, Mirzaa  GM, Pagon  RA, Wallace  SE, Amemiya  A, eds. Genereviews((R)). 1993:83–97.
  • 83. Marchi  G, Busti  F, Lira Zidanes  A, Castagna  A, Girelli  D. Aceruloplasminemia: A severe neurodegenerative disorder deserving an early diagnosis. Front Neurosci. 2019;13:325. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84. Oshiro  S, Kawamura  K, Zhang  C, et al.  Microglia and astroglia prevent oxidative stress-induced neuronal cell death: Implications for aceruloplasminemia. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2008;1782(2):109–117. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85. Piperno  A, Alessio  M. Aceruloplasminemia: Waiting for an efficient therapy. Front Neurosci. 2018;12:903. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86. Stockwell  BR, Friedmann Angeli  JP, Bayir  H, et al.  Ferroptosis: A regulated cell death nexus linking metabolism, redox biology, and disease. Cell. 2017;171(2):273–285. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87. Reichert  CO, de Freitas  FA, Sampaio-Silva  J, et al.  Ferroptosis mechanisms involved in neurodegenerative diseases. Int J Mol Sci. 2020;21(22):8765. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88. Mi  Y, Gao  X, Xu  H, Cui  Y, Zhang  Y, Gou  X. The emerging roles of ferroptosis in Huntington's disease. Neuromolecular Med. 2019;21(2):110–119. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89. Zhou  Y, Lin  W, Rao  T, et al.  Ferroptosis and its potential role in the nervous system diseases. J Inflamm Res. 2022;15:1555–1574. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90. Ashraf  A, Jeandriens  J, Parkes  HG, So  PW. Iron dyshomeostasis, lipid peroxidation and perturbed expression of cystine/glutamate antiporter in Alzheimer's disease: Evidence of ferroptosis. Redox Biol. 2020;32:101494. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91. Ashraf  A, So  PW. Spotlight on ferroptosis: Iron-dependent cell death in Alzheimer's disease. Front Aging Neurosci. 2020;12:196. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92. Thorwald  MA, Godoy-Lugo  JA, Garcia  G, et al.  Iron-associated lipid peroxidation in Alzheimer's disease is increased in lipid rafts with decreased ferroptosis suppressors, tested by chelation in mice. Alzheimers Dement. 2025;21(1):e14541. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 93. Ayton  S, Wang  Y, Diouf  I, et al.  Brain iron is associated with accelerated cognitive decline in people with Alzheimer pathology. Mol Psychiatry. 2020;25(11):2932–2941. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 94. Ayton  S, Fazlollahi  A, Bourgeat  P, et al.  Cerebral quantitative susceptibility mapping predicts amyloid-beta-related cognitive decline. Brain. 2017;140(8):2112–2119. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 95. Ayton  S, Faux  NG, Bush  AI. Alzheimer's disease neuroimaging I. Ferritin levels in the cerebrospinal fluid predict Alzheimer's disease outcomes and are regulated by APOE. Nat Commun. 2015;6:6760. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 96. Bao  WD, Pang  P, Zhou  XT, et al.  Loss of ferroportin induces memory impairment by promoting ferroptosis in Alzheimer's disease. Cell Death Differ. 2021;28(5):1548–1562. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 97. Ayton  S, Barton  D, Brew  B, et al.  Deferiprone in Alzheimer disease: A randomized clinical trial. JAMA Neurol. 2025;82(1):11–18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 98. Hinman  A, Holst  CR, Latham  JC, et al.  Vitamin E hydroquinone is an endogenous regulator of ferroptosis via redox control of 15-lipoxygenase. PLoS One. 2018;13(8):e0201369. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 99. Zeng  H, Jin  Z. The role of ferroptosis in Alzheimer's disease: Mechanisms and therapeutic potential (review). Mol Med Rep. 2025;32(1):192. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 100. Lloret  A, Esteve  D, Monllor  P, Cervera-Ferri  A, Lloret  A. The effectiveness of vitamin E treatment in Alzheimer's disease. Int J Mol Sci. 2019;20(4):879. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 101. Garg  R, Aravind  S, Kaur  S, Singh Chawla  SP, Aggarwal  S, Goyal  G. Role of serum ferritin as a prognostic marker in acute ischemic stroke: A preliminary observation. Ann Afr Med. 2020;19(2):95–102. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 102. Sultana  J, Sharma  DJ. Evaluation of Serum ferritin as a prognostic marker in acute ischemic stroke patients-A prospective cohort study. J Assoc Physicians India. 2022;70(4):11–12. [Google Scholar]
  • 103. Tian  X, Li  X, Pan  M, Yang  LZ, Li  Y, Fang  W. Progress of ferroptosis in ischemic stroke and therapeutic targets. Cell Mol Neurobiol. 2024;44(1):25. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 104. Alim  I, Caulfield  JT, Chen  Y, et al.  Selenium drives a transcriptional adaptive program to block ferroptosis and treat stroke. Cell. 2019;177(5):1262–1279.e25. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 105. Mehdiratta  M, Kumar  S, Hackney  D, Schlaug  G, Selim  M. Association between serum ferritin level and perihematoma edema volume in patients with spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage. Stroke. 2008;39(4):1165–1170. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 106. Dexter  DT, Carayon  A, Javoy-Agid  F, et al.  Alterations in the levels of iron, ferritin and other trace metals in Parkinson's disease and other neurodegenerative diseases affecting the basal ganglia. Brain. 1991;114(Pt 4):1953–1975. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 107. Li  KR, Avecillas-Chasin  J, Nguyen  TD, et al.  Quantitative evaluation of brain iron accumulation in different stages of Parkinson's disease. J Neuroimaging. 2022;32(2):363–371. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 108. Xuan  M, Guan  X, Gu  Q, et al.  Different iron deposition patterns in early- and middle-late-onset Parkinson's disease. Parkinsonism Relat Disord. 2017;44:23–27. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 109. Zeng  W, Cai  J, Zhang  L, Peng  Q. Iron deposition in Parkinson's disease: A Mini-review. Cell Mol Neurobiol. 2024;44(1):26. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 110. Fedorova  TN, Logvinenko  AA, Poleshchuk  VV, Muzychuk  OA, Shabalina  AA, Illarioshkin  SN. Lipid peroxidation products in the blood plasma of patients with Parkinson’s disease as possible biomarkers of different stages of the disease. Neurochemical Journal. 2019;13(4):391–395. [Google Scholar]
  • 111. Fariss  MW, Zhang  JG. Vitamin E therapy in Parkinson's disease. Toxicology. 2003;189(1–2):129–146. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 112. Hao  X, Li  H, Li  Q, et al.  Dietary vitamin E intake and risk of Parkinson's disease: A cross-sectional study. Front Nutr. 2024;10:1289238. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 113. Schirinzi  T, Martella  G, Imbriani  P, et al.  Dietary vitamin E as a protective factor for Parkinson's disease: Clinical and experimental evidence. Front Neurol. 2019;10:148. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 114. Vatassery  GT, Bauer  T, Dysken  M. High doses of vitamin E in the treatment of disorders of the central nervous system in the aged. Am J Clin Nutr. 1999;70(5):793–801. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 115. Tian  Y, Lu  J, Hao  X, et al.  FTH1 inhibits ferroptosis through ferritinophagy in the 6-OHDA model of Parkinson's disease. Neurotherapeutics. 2020;17(4):1796–1812. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 116. Kumar  A, Ratan  RR. Oxidative stress and Huntington's disease: The good, the bad, and the ugly. J Huntingtons Dis. 2016;5(3):217–237. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 117. Klepac  N, Relja  M, Klepac  R, Hecimovic  S, Babic  T, Trkulja  V. Oxidative stress parameters in plasma of Huntington's disease patients, asymptomatic Huntington's disease gene carriers and healthy subjects: A cross-sectional study. J Neurol. 2007;254(12):1676–1683. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 118. Simmons  DA, Casale  M, Alcon  B, Pham  N, Narayan  N, Lynch  G. Ferritin accumulation in dystrophic microglia is an early event in the development of Huntington's disease. Glia. 2007;55(10):1074–1084. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 119. Chen  J, Marks  E, Lai  B, et al.  Iron accumulates in Huntington's disease neurons: Protection by deferoxamine. PLoS One. 2013;8(10):e77023. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 120. Mead  RJ, Shan  N, Reiser  HJ, Marshall  F, Shaw  PJ. Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: A neurodegenerative disorder poised for successful therapeutic translation. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2023;22(3):185–212. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 121. Berdynski  M, Miszta  P, Safranow  K, et al.  SOD1 mutations associated with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis analysis of variant severity. Sci Rep. 2022;12(1):103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 122. Wang  L, Li  C, Chen  X, Li  S, Shang  H. Abnormal Serum iron-Status indicator changes in Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (ALS) patients: A meta-analysis. Front Neurol. 2020;11:380. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 123. Goodall  EF, Haque  MS, Morrison  KE. Increased serum ferritin levels in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) patients. J Neurol. 2008;255(11):1652–1656. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 124. Devos  D, Moreau  C, Kyheng  M, et al.  A ferroptosis–based panel of prognostic biomarkers for Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis. Sci Rep.  2019;9(1):2918. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 125. Liddell  JR, Hilton  JBW, Kysenius  K, et al.  Microglial ferroptotic stress causes non-cell autonomous neuronal death. Mol Neurodegener. 2024;19(1):14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 126. Mesci  P, Zaidi  S, Lobsiger  CS, et al.  System xC- is a mediator of microglial function and its deletion slows symptoms in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis mice. Brain. 2015;138(Pt 1):53–68. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 127. Weigel  KJ, Lynch  SG, LeVine  SM. Iron chelation and multiple sclerosis. ASN Neuro. 2014;6(1):e00136. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 128. Bagnato  F, Hametner  S, Welch  EB. Visualizing iron in multiple sclerosis. Magn Reson Imaging. 2013;31(3):376–384. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 129. LeVine  SM. Iron deposits in multiple sclerosis and Alzheimer's disease brains. Brain Res. 1997;760(1–2):298–303. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 130. LeVine  SM, Lynch  SG, Ou  CN, Wulser  MJ, Tam  E, Boo  N. Ferritin, transferrin and iron concentrations in the cerebrospinal fluid of multiple sclerosis patients. Brain Res. 1999;821(2):511–515. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 131. Jhelum  P, Zandee  S, Ryan  F, et al.  Ferroptosis induces detrimental effects in chronic EAE and its implications for progressive MS. Acta Neuropathol Commun. 2023;11(1):121. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 132. Van San  E, Debruyne  AC, Veeckmans  G, et al.  Ferroptosis contributes to multiple sclerosis and its pharmacological targeting suppresses experimental disease progression. Cell Death Differ. 2023;30(9):2092–2103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 133. Kumar  N, Cohen-Gadol  AA, Wright  RA, Miller  GM, Piepgras  DG, Ahlskog  JE. Superficial siderosis. Neurology. 2006;66(8):1144–1152. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 134. Wang  Y, Juan  LV, Ma  X, et al.  Specific hemosiderin deposition in spleen induced by a low dose of cisplatin: Altered iron metabolism and its implication as an acute hemosiderin formation model. Curr Drug Metab. 2010;11(6):507–515. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 135. Kantarci  K, Gunter  JL, Tosakulwong  N, et al.  Focal hemosiderin deposits and beta-amyloid load in the ADNI cohort. Alzheimers Dement. 2013;9(5 Suppl):S116–S123. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 136. Quintana  C, Bellefqih  S, Laval  JY, et al.  Study of the localization of iron, ferritin, and hemosiderin in Alzheimer's disease hippocampus by analytical microscopy at the subcellular level. J Struct Biol. 2006;153(1):42–54. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 137. Okubo  S, Xi  G, Keep  RF, Muraszko  KM, Hua  Y. Cerebral hemorrhage, brain edema, and heme oxygenase-1 expression after experimental traumatic brain injury. Acta Neurochir Suppl. 2013;118:83–87. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 138. Beschorner  R, Adjodah  D, Schwab  JM, et al.  Long-term expression of heme oxygenase-1 (HO-1, HSP-32) following focal cerebral infarctions and traumatic brain injury in humans. Acta Neuropathol. 2000;100(4):377–384. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 139. Maas  AI, Stocchetti  N, Bullock  R. Moderate and severe traumatic brain injury in adults. Lancet Neurol. 2008;7(8):728–741. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 140. Fang  J, Yuan  Q, Du  Z, et al.  Ferroptosis in brain microvascular endothelial cells mediates blood-brain barrier disruption after traumatic brain injury. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2022;619:34–41. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 141. Rui  T, Wang  H, Li  Q, et al.  Deletion of ferritin H in neurons counteracts the protective effect of melatonin against traumatic brain injury-induced ferroptosis. J Pineal Res. 2021;70(2):e12704. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 142. Cheng  H, Wang  N, Ma  X, et al.  Spatial-temporal changes of iron deposition and iron metabolism after traumatic brain injury in mice. Front Mol Neurosci. 2022;15:949573. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 143. Zimmer  TS, David  B, Broekaart  DWM, et al.  Seizure-mediated iron accumulation and dysregulated iron metabolism after status epilepticus and in temporal lobe epilepsy. Acta Neuropathol. 2021;142(4):729–759. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 144. Daglas  M, Adlard  PA. The involvement of iron in traumatic brain injury and neurodegenerative disease. Front Neurosci. 2018;12:981. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 145. Blennow  K, Hardy  J, Zetterberg  H. The neuropathology and neurobiology of traumatic brain injury. Neuron. 2012;76(5):886–899. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 146. Gao  C, Jiang  J, Tan  Y, Chen  S. Microglia in neurodegenerative diseases: Mechanism and potential therapeutic targets. Signal Transduct Target Ther. 2023;8(1):359. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 147. Colonna  M, Butovsky  O. Microglia function in the central nervous system during health and neurodegeneration. Annu Rev Immunol. 2017;35:441–468. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 148. Prinz  M, Jung  S, Priller  J. Microglia biology: One century of evolving concepts. Cell. 2019;179(2):292–311. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 149. Kapralov  AA, Yang  Q, Dar  HH, et al.  Redox lipid reprogramming commands susceptibility of macrophages and microglia to ferroptotic death. Nat Chem Biol. 2020;16(3):278–290. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 150. Reinert  A, Morawski  M, Seeger  J, Arendt  T, Reinert  T. Iron concentrations in neurons and glial cells with estimates on ferritin concentrations. BMC Neurosci. 2019;20(1):25. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 151. van Duijn  S, Bulk  M, van Duinen  SG, et al.  Cortical iron reflects severity of Alzheimer's disease. J Alzheimers Dis. 2017;60(4):1533–1545. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 152. Zeineh  MM, Chen  Y, Kitzler  HH, Hammond  R, Vogel  H, Rutt  BK. Activated iron-containing microglia in the human hippocampus identified by magnetic resonance imaging in Alzheimer disease. Neurobiol Aging. 2015;36(9):2483–2500. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 153. Cui  Y, Zhang  Z, Zhou  X, et al.  Microglia and macrophage exhibit attenuated inflammatory response and ferroptosis resistance after RSL3 stimulation via increasing Nrf2 expression. J Neuroinflammation. 2021;18(1):249. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 154. Liu  S, Gao  X, Zhou  S. New target for prevention and treatment of neuroinflammation: Microglia iron accumulation and ferroptosis. ASN Neuro. 2022;14:17590914221133236. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 155. Oakley  H, Cole  SL, Logan  S, et al.  Intraneuronal beta-amyloid aggregates, neurodegeneration, and neuron loss in transgenic mice with five familial Alzheimer's disease mutations: Potential factors in amyloid plaque formation. J Neurosci. 2006;26(40):10129–10140. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 156. Radde  R, Bolmont  T, Kaeser  SA, et al.  Abeta42-driven cerebral amyloidosis in transgenic mice reveals early and robust pathology. EMBO Rep. 2006;7(9):940–946. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 157. Saito  T, Matsuba  Y, Mihira  N, et al.  Single app knock-in mouse models of Alzheimer's disease. Nat Neurosci. 2014;17(5):661–663. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 158. Gotzl  JK, Brendel  M, Werner  G, et al.  Opposite microglial activation stages upon loss of PGRN or TREM2 result in reduced cerebral glucose metabolism. EMBO Mol Med. 2019;11(6):e9711. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 159. Reifschneider  A, Robinson  S, van Lengerich  B, et al.  Loss of TREM2 rescues hyperactivation of microglia, but not lysosomal deficits and neurotoxicity in models of progranulin deficiency. EMBO J. 2022;41(4):e109108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 160. Torres-Velarde  JM, Allen  KN, Salvador-Pascual  A, et al.  Peroxiredoxin 6 suppresses ferroptosis in lung endothelial cells. Free Radic Biol Med. 2024;218:82–93. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 161. Fujita  H, Tanaka  YK, Ogata  S, et al.  PRDX6 augments selenium utilization to limit iron toxicity and ferroptosis. Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2024;31(8):1277–1285. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 162. Paolicelli  RC, Sierra  A, Stevens  B, et al.  Microglia states and nomenclature: A field at its crossroads. Neuron. 2022;110(21):3458–3483. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 163. Ayton  S, Janelidze  S, Kalinowski  P, et al.  CSF ferritin in the clinicopathological progression of Alzheimer's disease and associations with APOE and inflammation biomarkers. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2023;94(3):211–219. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 164. Kong  Y, Hu  L, Lu  K, et al.  Ferroportin downregulation promotes cell proliferation by modulating the Nrf2-miR-17-5p axis in multiple myeloma. Cell Death Dis. 2019;10(9):624. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 165. Drakesmith  H, Nemeth  E, Ganz  T. Ironing out Ferroportin. Cell Metab. 2015;22(5):777–787. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 166. Lv  SL, Zeng  ZF, Gan  WQ, et al.  Lp-PLA2 inhibition prevents Ang II-induced cardiac inflammation and fibrosis by blocking macrophage NLRP3 inflammasome activation. Acta Pharmacol Sin. 2021;42(12):2016–2032. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 167. Patel  BN, David  S. A novel glycosylphosphatidylinositol-anchored form of ceruloplasmin is expressed by mammalian astrocytes. J Biol Chem. 1997;272(32):20185–20190. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 168. Tsvetkov  P, Coy  S, Petrova  B, et al.  Copper induces cell death by targeting lipoylated TCA cycle proteins. Science. 2022;375(6586):1254–1261. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

fcag109_Supplementary_Data

Data Availability Statement

Data sharing is not applicable to this article as no new data were created or analysed in this study. All data utilized for this review are included in the following published articles and their respective supplementary information files: Pesämaa et al. 2023 (doi:10.1186/s13024-023-00657-w), Sebastian Monasor, Müller et al. 2020 (doi:10.7554/eLife.54083), Eninger et al. 2022 (doi:10.1073/pnas.2119804119). Additionally, our manually curated list of ferroptosis-relevant entries is available as Supplementary Table 1. Graphs and illustrations were designed and generated using Adobe Illustrator 2024, Microsoft Excel (version 16.96.1) and DeepVenn (Tim Hulsen 2020). A list of abbreviations is included in Supplementary Table 2.


Articles from Brain Communications are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES