Skip to main content
The Western Journal of Medicine logoLink to The Western Journal of Medicine
. 1999 Jun;170(6):348–351.

Developing clinical guidelines

Paul G Shekelle 1,2,3,4, Steven H Woolf 1,2,3,4, Martin Eccles 1,2,3,4, Jeremy Grimshaw 1,2,3,4
PMCID: PMC1305691  PMID: 18751155

Abstract

The methods of guideline development should ensure that treating patients according to guidelines will achieve the outcomes that are desired. This article presents a combination of the literature about guideline development and the results of our combined experience in guideline development in North America and Britain. It considers the 5 steps in the initial development of an evidence-based guideline.

Full text

PDF
348

Images in this article

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Coulter I., Adams A., Shekelle P. Impact of varying panel membership on ratings of appropriateness in consensus panels: a comparison of a multi- and single disciplinary panel. Health Serv Res. 1995 Oct;30(4):577–591. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Dickersin K., Scherer R., Lefebvre C. Identifying relevant studies for systematic reviews. BMJ. 1994 Nov 12;309(6964):1286–1291. doi: 10.1136/bmj.309.6964.1286. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Egger M., Zellweger-Zähner T., Schneider M., Junker C., Lengeler C., Antes G. Language bias in randomised controlled trials published in English and German. Lancet. 1997 Aug 2;350(9074):326–329. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(97)02419-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Grégoire G., Derderian F., Le Lorier J. Selecting the language of the publications included in a meta-analysis: is there a Tower of Babel bias? J Clin Epidemiol. 1995 Jan;48(1):159–163. doi: 10.1016/0895-4356(94)00098-b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Kahan J. P., Park R. E., Leape L. L., Bernstein S. J., Hilborne L. H., Parker L., Kamberg C. J., Ballard D. J., Brook R. H. Variations by specialty in physician ratings of the appropriateness and necessity of indications for procedures. Med Care. 1996 Jun;34(6):512–523. doi: 10.1097/00005650-199606000-00002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Kosecoff J., Kanouse D. E., Rogers W. H., McCloskey L., Winslow C. M., Brook R. H. Effects of the National Institutes of Health Consensus Development Program on physician practice. JAMA. 1987 Nov 20;258(19):2708–2713. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Leape L. L., Park R. E., Kahan J. P., Brook R. H. Group judgments of appropriateness: the effect of panel composition. Qual Assur Health Care. 1992 Jun;4(2):151–159. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Miller J. N., Colditz G. A., Mosteller F. How study design affects outcomes in comparisons of therapy. II: Surgical. Stat Med. 1989 Apr;8(4):455–466. doi: 10.1002/sim.4780080409. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Moher D., Pham B., Jones A., Cook D. J., Jadad A. R., Moher M., Tugwell P., Klassen T. P. Does quality of reports of randomised trials affect estimates of intervention efficacy reported in meta-analyses? Lancet. 1998 Aug 22;352(9128):609–613. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(98)01085-X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Schulz K. F., Chalmers I., Hayes R. J., Altman D. G. Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials. JAMA. 1995 Feb 1;273(5):408–412. doi: 10.1001/jama.273.5.408. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Shekelle P. G., Chassin M. R., Park R. E. Assessing the predictive validity of the RAND/UCLA appropriateness method criteria for performing carotid endarterectomy. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 1998 Fall;14(4):707–727. doi: 10.1017/s0266462300012022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Shekelle P. G., Schriger D. L. Evaluating the use of the appropriateness method in the Agency for Health Care Policy and Research Clinical Practice Guideline Development process. Health Serv Res. 1996 Oct;31(4):453–468. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Western Journal of Medicine are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES