Skip to main content
Scientific Reports logoLink to Scientific Reports
. 2026 Feb 28;16:11455. doi: 10.1038/s41598-026-37724-3

Topographic modulation of soil functional indicators in shaded coffee agroforestry systems: a multivariate and network-based approach

Cristiane Maria Gonçalves Crespo 1, Victor Casimiro Piscoya 2, Robson Carlos Pereira de Melo 1, Ludmilla Morais Pereira 3, Luiz Diego Vidal Santos 4,, Francisco Sandro Rodrigues Holanda 5, Alceu Pedrotti 5, Savanna Alice Botelho da Silva 3, Moacyr Cunha Filho 6, Renisson Neponuceno de Araújo Filho 2
PMCID: PMC13057021  PMID: 41764216

Abstract

Brazil is the world’s leading coffee producer and increasingly adopts shaded agroforestry systems to enhance sustainability. However, the influence of topography on soil functionality within these systems remains insufficiently understood. This study evaluated soil physical and chemical properties across slope positions (Upper, Middle, and Lower Thirds) and depths (0–60 cm) in a shaded coffee agroforestry system using multivariate statistics and Bayesian network modeling. Results revealed that upper slope positions exhibited greater macroporosity (15–20%) and lower bulk density (1.10–1.15 g cm⁻3), whereas lower slope positions accumulated higher total organic carbon (2.5–3.0%) and microporosity (28–32%). Principal Component Analysis indicated that topography modulated soil porosity and carbon distribution, with total organic carbon (TOC) positively correlating with nutrient availability and negatively with acidity. Bayesian network analysis identified TOC as the most influential attribute, displaying the highest expected influence (1.25) and strength (1.15), along with elevated centrality in conserved environments. These results demonstrate that TOC functions as a central integrator linking soil structure, chemistry, and fertility across topographic gradients. Overall, shaded coffee agroforestry enhanced soil quality and functionality, particularly in upper slope areas, underscoring its potential for sustainable land management in tropical landscapes.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1038/s41598-026-37724-3.

Keywords: Soil variability, Organic carbon, Landscape gradients, Principal components

Subject terms: Ecology, Ecology, Environmental sciences, Plant sciences

Introduction

Coffee cultivation (Coffea spp., Rubiaceae) is one of the most important perennial agricultural activities in tropical regions. Brazil, historically the global leader in both production and exports, harvested 51.36 million bags in 2016, accounting for 33.4% of the world’s supply, with exports exceeding 578,000 tons in the first months of 20171.

This coffee production chain supports approximately 8.4 million jobs and is economically strategic for small and medium-sized producers, especially in mountainous regions2. However, production intensification under conventional systems, characterized by heavy use of synthetic fertilizers, herbicides, and mechanization on sloping terrain, has accelerated tropical soil degradation3,4.

Soil degradation in conventional coffee systems is evidenced by declines in total organic carbon stocks, structural disruption, increased bulk density and water erosivity, acidification, nutrient leaching, and depletion of cation exchange capacity57. These processes impair critical soil functions, including water retention, mineralizable nitrogen supply, and resilience to water erosion8. Soil function refers to the capacity of soil to perform essential processes such as nutrient cycling, water storage, and supporting biodiversity9, whereas soil quality is commonly assessed through indicators including organic matter content, porosity, and microbial activity10.

To address these issues, agroforestry systems with shaded coffee have been adopted by farmers seeking more sustainable production practices11. In these systems, the presence of native tree species plays a key role in modulating soil biogeochemical and structural processes12,13.

These trees directly enrich organic matter14, improve soil fertility, and stimulate microbial activity15, thereby increasing nutrient retention and carbon fixation in plants16. Additionally, the shade provided by these trees reduces temperature and evaporation, maintaining a more stable and favorable microclimate for coffee tree development17.

Furthermore, litter deposition in shaded agroforestry environments contributes to the formation of humic substances, aggregate stabilization through glomalin and mucilage production, and nutrient retention via organo-mineral interactions within colloidal microdomains18,19. Glomalins are glycoproteins produced by arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi that enhance soil aggregate stability20, whereas mucilages are polysaccharides that improve soil structure21. Organo-mineral interactions involve the binding of organic matter to mineral surfaces, protecting organic carbon from decomposition22. In highly weathered soils, such as Latosols and Argisols dominated by iron and aluminum oxides, these mechanisms are crucial for stabilizing soil organic matter23.

Shading acts as a physical and biological barrier against water erosion through multiple interconnected mechanisms. Plant residues on the soil surface significantly reduce runoff, with studies reporting reductions of up to 90% under optimal agroforestry conditions2426. These protective mechanisms operate through residue accumulation at the soil surface, which attenuates raindrop impact and reduces soil detachment27.

Biologically, residues promote the formation of larger soil aggregates and increased macroporosity, collectively enhancing water infiltration and reducing surface runoff. The protective mechanisms include litter accumulation, reduced soil surface sealing, and increased infiltration capacity28,29. Additionally, shading modulates microclimatic conditions by reducing temperature fluctuations, thereby promoting water infiltration and stimulating functional microbial communities. This biological activity enhances nutrient mineralization and stabilizes biogeochemical cycles such as nitrogen (N) and carbon (C) cycling6,30.

Topographic position is another key factor modulating soil functionality in coffee-growing systems. In mountainous tropical environments, toposequences influence the redistribution of sediments, water, and soil organic matter through leaching, sheet erosion, and surface runoff31,32.

Upper slope regions frequently retain greater total organic carbon stocks33,34, exhibit higher aggregate stability35,36, and sustain increased microbial enzyme activity37,38, whereas lower slope areas often experience compaction, accumulation of exchangeable aluminum31,32, and reduced effective porosity39, compromising water storage and root oxygenation.

Despite advances in understanding the benefits of agroforestry systems, substantial knowledge gaps remain regarding the integrated influence of shading and topography on soil functionality in tropical agroecosystems. Most current studies focus on isolated analyses of physical, chemical, or microbiological attributes and lack the systemic approach necessary to assess soil quality in these environments4042.

The fragmented thematic priorities and methodological approaches in soil research are well documented43,44, particularly in tropical regions where comprehensive, integrated assessments remain scarce42,45,46 and47 highlight the lack of studies evaluating multiple variables simultaneously.

These integrated parameters provide sensitive indicators of soil quality. Among the most promising are stratified total organic carbon stocks, litter carbon-to-nitrogen ratios, activities of hydrolytic and oxidative enzymes (e.g., β-glucosidase, phosphatase), aggregate stability indices, and microbial biomass carbon48. Such indicators enable assessment of the soil’s capacity to sustain essential ecosystem functions, especially in environments exposed to anthropogenic pressures and severe environmental constraints.

Therefore, this study aimed to analyze the interactions among physical, chemical, and biological soil attributes and their influence on total organic carbon (TOC) in shaded coffee agroforestry systems using network modeling and principal component analysis. Additionally, it evaluated the combined effects of shading by native trees and topographic position on physical, chemical, and microbiological soil attributes in agroforestry coffee plantations in the municipality of Taquaritinga do Norte, Pernambuco State, Brazil.

Material and methods

The study was carried out at the Várzea da Onça farm in the municipality of Taquaritinga do Norte, located within the Borborema Plateau geoenvironmental unit in Pernambuco State (Fig. 1), at the geographical coordinates 7° 53′17’’ South and 36° 5′33’’ West (decimal degrees: –7.88806, –36.0925). In the area, the predominant relief is called Brejo de Altitude, situated on the banks of the PE-130 highway, approximately 12 km from the PE-104 highway. The predominant soil type is a Typical Eutrophic Red-Yellow Argisol (Argissolo Vermelho-Amarelo Eutrófico Típico), with a medium to clayey texture and a prominent A horizon.

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Location map of the study area at Várzea da Onça Farm in the municipality of Taquaritinga do Norte, Pernambuco State, Brazil. Note: The map was produced using QGIS version 3.34.4 (Prizren) (https://qgis.org), with vector data from IBGE (2022) and satellite imagery from Google Satellite (2025). Coordinate reference system: SIRGAS 2000.

Local vegetation consists of subperennial forest type and mountainous relief49. Soil types in the region are predominantly anthropogenic due to historical land-use changes. To account for heterogeneity in soil nutrient variations across sampling sites, locations with comparable soil profiles were selected based on preliminary surveys.

Stability of soil background values was maintained through long-term (> 10 years) positioning of the agroforestry system. The study was conducted with the prior consent and authorization of the landowner of the Várzea da Onça farm, who granted permission for access to the area and execution of all field procedures before data collection.

The region’s climate is classified as Aw, a tropical climate with dry winters, deep and narrow valleys, and mountainous relief. Annual precipitation averages 721 mm, with the highest rainfall occurring between February and August. The mean annual temperature is 21 °C, and elevation ranges from 736 to 1.100 m50.

Two areas were evaluated in the experiment: one with native vegetation and another with coffee plantations intercropped with native vegetation, hereafter referred to as shaded coffee. This system was subdivided into three plots: Upper Third (UT), Middle Third (MT), and Lower Third (LT).

Native vegetation: The experimental area covers 4.57 ha and consists of native tree species ranging from 20 to 35 m in height. Based on the floristic survey carried out, the following species were identified in the regenerating secondary vegetation: Tabebuia serratifolia (pau-d’arco), Anacardium occidentale L. (cashew), Cordia goeldiana (freijó), Calomys tener, Cecropia sp. (embaúba), Spondias purpurea (ciriguela), Ceiba glaziovii (barriguda), Acacia glomerosa, Copaifera langsdorffii (copaíba), Spondias mombin (cajá), Ficus sp. (gameleira), Guazuma ulmifolia (mutamba), Styrax leprosus, and Psidium australe Cambess (aracaeiro).

Additional regionally occurring species included Galezia gorazema Moq., Rubus sp. (Rosaceae), Inga subnuda Salzm. ex Benth., Caesalpinia leiostachya Benth. Ducke, Copaifera trapezifolia Hayne, Roupala cearaensis Sleumer, Cedrela sp., Terminalia sp., Oreopanax capitatum Decne et Planch. var. multiflorum (DC.) E. March, Manilkara rufula (Miq.) Lam, Aspidosperma pyricollum Müll. Arg., and Tabebuia avellanedae Lorentz ex Griseb., according to51.

Regarding shaded coffee (Fig. 2), the cultivation system consisted of rustic management with minimal forest alteration. The area was 25.59 ha and had been planted for more than ten years with coffee (Coffea arabica L). The percentage of shade provided by native vegetation was approximately 75%. Coffee seedlings were planted within a native vegetation area, with planting holes measuring 0.40 × 0.40 m in width and depth, spaced 2 m apart.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

Experimental areas of shaded coffee cultivation in an agroforestry system: (a) Upper Third (UT), (b) Middle Third (MT), (c) Lower Third (LT), and (d) schematic representation of the experimental area.

The cultivation methods employed were organic fertilization with cattle manure and poultry litter, thinning with a hand-held brush cutter, and tree pruning. Fertilizers were sourced from local farms, with cattle manure containing approximately 1.5% N, 0.5% P, and 1% K, and poultry litter containing 3% N, 2% P, and 1.5% K. Agronomic practices included manual weeding, no irrigation, and pest control using neem oil sprays52. Pest control details followed Bhattarai et al.53. Shade trees at each slope position consisted of similar native species to ensure comparable rhizosphere environments. Canopy density was estimated at 75% shade coverage using hemispherical photography54.

Six trenches were excavated in each area, spaced 50 m apart, with dimensions of 1.5 × 1.5 m and a depth of 0.80 m across the three topographic positions. In each trench, three sampling points were established, and disturbed and undisturbed soil samples were collected for physical and chemical analysis at depths of 0–0.20, 0.20–0.40, and 0.40–0.60 m.

Disturbed samples for microbiological analyses were collected at 0–0.05 m depths. The 0–0.60 m sampling interval encompasses the A and upper B horizons, where nutrient dynamics are most active. This depth range was chosen based on literature evidence indicating significant variation in organic carbon and porosity within this range. The three sampling points per trench were collected based on preliminary power analysis and logistical constraints, providing adequate statistical power (> 0.80) for detecting medium to large effect sizes in MANOVA.

Soil granulometric analysis was carried out using the densimeter method55. Soil bulk density was measured using the volumetric ring method described by56, and total porosity was obtained using the direct method according to57.

Pore-size distribution (Eq. 1) was calculated by analyzing the soil water retention curve (SWRC) after determining total porosity. Pore-size classification followed established protocols relating pore diameter to matric potential, with macropores (> 50 μm diameter) corresponding to drainage at low suctions58,59. This approach is consistent with classical soil physics principles linking pore geometry to water retention behavior59.

graphic file with name d33e727.gif 1

where Pt is the total porosity expressed in cm3 cm–3, Vp is pore volume in cm3, and Vt is total sample volume in cm3.

Soil macroporosity was obtained at a tension of 1 kPa, as suggested by60, according to Eq. 2:

graphic file with name d33e750.gif 2

where Ma is macroporosity in cm3 cm–3, Vma is macropore volume in cm3, and Vt is sample volume in cm3.

Mesoporosity was determined after balancing the volume of water retained between 1 and 6 kPa, according to Eq. 3:

graphic file with name d33e769.gif 3

where Me is mesoporosity in cm3 cm–3, Vme is mesopore volume expressed in cm3, and Vt is the total sample volume expressed in cm3.

Microporosity was obtained after balancing the volume of water retained between 6 and 1500 kPa, according to Eq. 4:

graphic file with name d33e788.gif 4

where Mi is microporosity in cm3 cm–3, Vmi is micropore volume in cm3, and Vt is total sample volume in cm3.

The soil cryptopores were determined using the difference between the weight of the ring-soil set balanced at 1500 kPa and the weight of the ring-soil set dried in an oven at 105 ºC until constant weight, according to Eq. 5:

graphic file with name d33e807.gif 5

where Crypto is cryptoporosity, in m3 m-3, Vcripto is the cryptopore volume obtained from soil mass differences and converted to volume by dividing by water density (Da), and Vt is total soil volume, obtained by the volume of the volumetric ring (πr2h), expressed in m3.

In the chemical analysis, exchangeable cations (Ca2⁺, Mg2⁺, Na⁺, K⁺ and Al3⁺) were determined following57, together with available phosphorus and extractable micronutrients (Mn, Fe, Zn, Cu, B and Mo) as operationally defined by the respective extractants. Potential acidity (H⁺ + Al3⁺), sum of bases (SB), potential cation exchange capacity (T), effective cation exchange capacity (t), base saturation (V) and aluminum saturation (m) were calculated according to57. Total organic carbon was measured using potassium dichromate oxidation, and pH was determined in CaCl₂ solution.

Statistical analysis

Data were submitted to multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA) using a Multivariate General Linear Model (GLM) with bootstrap resampling (n = 1000) to simultaneously evaluate the effects of topographic position (Upper, Middle, Lower Third, and Native Forest), soil depth (0–0.20, 0.20–0.40, and 0.40–0.60 m), and the interaction between these factors on different functional sets of soil physical attributes. A multivariate GLM was selected instead of a traditional ANOVA due to the presence of multiple intercorrelated dependent variables and the greater flexibility of GLM in terms of the shape of the distribution and residuals, being more robust in small or heteroscedastic samples. Bootstrap resampling mitigates overfitting by repeatedly sampling from the observed data to estimate sampling distributions. This reduces the dependence on model assumptions, providing more robust parameter estimates in small-sample contexts.

The model was adjusted using the gamma distribution and the identity link function, selected on the basis of the best performance of the model according to the Akaike Information Criterion (AIC). The assumption of homogeneity of covariance between the groups was met, as indicated by the Box M test. Multivariate normality was considered plausible based on the distribution of residuals and the robustness of the model with resampling.

All main effects and interactions were evaluated using multivariate statistics (Pillai’s trace, Wilks’ Lambda, Hotelling’s trace and Roy’s largest root). The significance of the effects was monitored by estimating the partial effect size (partial η2), interpreted according to61: small (η2 > 0.01), moderate (η2 > 0.06) and large (η2 > 0.14). When significant main effects or interactions were identified, pairwise multiple comparisons were carried out with Bonferroni correction, which controls type I error in multiple tests and is recommended for samples with moderate variation. Bonferroni correction was preferred over false discovery rate methods because our study involves a moderate number of pairwise comparisons and Bonferroni provides stronger control of family-wise error rate, which is more appropriate for confirmatory analyses with moderate sample sizes.

The dependent variables of the physical attributes included in the models were: soil density, total porosity, macroporosity, mesoporosity, total microporosity and cryptoporosity. For the chemical attributes, the following were considered: pH in CaCl₂, available phosphorus, potassium, calcium, magnesium, sodium, potential acidity (H⁺ + Al3⁺), sum of bases, effective and potential cation exchange capacity, base saturation and aluminum saturation. The set of variables related to soil organic matter (SOM) included: labile carbon, light organic matter, carbon in fulvic acid, humic acid and humin, total carbon, total nitrogen, C/N ratio and the stocks of the respective fractions.

The adjusted means were estimated using the marginal means method, and multiple comparisons were carried out with Bonferroni correction. In addition, independent linear regression models were fitted for each soil depth, with the aim of investigating the intra-stratified variation of the attributes as a function of topographic position. The analyses were conducted in the R environment62.

Interactions by network analysis

Relationships among soil attributes were modeled using a partial correlation network estimated through a Gaussian Graphical Model (GGM), regularized with an ℓ₁ (LASSO) penalty and automated model selection based on the Extended Bayesian Information Criterion (EBIC) following63. The tuning parameter γ was set to 0.5 to balance parsimony and model fit, eliminating spurious connections while favoring an interpretable network.

The network incorporated physicochemical and biological soil variables. Nodes represented soil attributes, and edges indicated partial correlations between pairs of variables, adjusted for the presence of all other variables.

To identify which attributes exert the greatest structural influence on the edaphic system, node centrality metrics were evaluated following64. The metrics included strength (sum of absolute edge weights), proximity (inverse of the sum of the geodesic distances, indicating accessibility), and intermediation (frequency with which a node lies on minimum paths between variable pairs, indicating its role as a structural link). All centrality indices were standardized as z-scores.

Robustness of network estimates was assessed using nonparametric bootstrap resampling (n = 1000) to calculate confidence intervals for edges and centrality estimates, along with case-dropping bootstrap for stability evaluation.

The centrality stability coefficient (CS-coefficient) was calculated to determine the maximum proportion of cases that could be excluded without compromising, with 95% confidence, the stability of centrality rankings. Values greater than 0.25 were considered acceptable and values greater than 0.50 desirable, as recommended by65.

Principal component analysis

The Principal Component Analysis (PCA) was used to synthesize variability and identify patterns associated with positions and soil depths. Variables were standardized (Z-score), and component retention followed the Kaiser rule (eigenvalues > 1), with Varimax rotation. Factor loadings |≥ 0.40| were considered significant. Visualization employed biplots of the first two components with 95% confidence ellipses for each position and depth. Analyses were conducted in R version 4.3.162 using the RStudio IDE with FactoMineR, factoextra, and ggplot2 packages.

Results and discussion

Soil chemical attributes

For chemical attributes, MANOVA detected statistically significant main effects of topographic position, soil depth, and their interaction, indicating that spatial distribution in soil chemical attributes was influenced by both slope position and vertical profile stratification. The attributes evaluated included pH in CaCl₂, exchangeable aluminum (Al3⁺), potential acidity (H⁺ + Al3⁺), sum of bases (SB), cation exchange capacity at pH 7.0 (CEC), base saturation (V%), and aluminum saturation (m%).

Multivariate statistics were robust, with Pillai’s Trace = 2.436; F(18, 99) = 23.77; p < 0.001 and Wilks’ Lambda = 0.0002; F(18, 88) = 94.00; p < 0.001, indicating that the combined variation in chemical attributes differed significantly among the analyzed factors. The magnitude of Pillai’s Trace suggests a substantial proportion of variance in the dependent variables explained by the predictors, while the extremely low value of Wilks’ Lambda denotes minimal unexplained multivariate variance.

From an edaphic perspective, these results imply that toposequence position modulates chemical fertility gradients, with upper slope positions often exhibiting higher pH, lower Al3⁺ activity, and greater base saturation due to better drainage and reduced leaching of base cations66. In contrast, lower slope positions tend to accumulate exchangeable aluminum and potential acidity, reflecting colluvial deposition and possibly greater water saturation, which may intensify base leaching and favor acidification67. The significant interaction between slope position and depth reinforces that nutrient distribution patterns and acidity dynamics are not uniform across the profile, but rather shaped by the interplay between lateral and vertical transport processes in the landscape68.

Large effect sizes for topographic position (F(18, 99) = 23.391; p < 0.001; partial η2 = 0.810) and depth (F(12, 64) = 14.250; p < 0.001; partial η2 = 0.728), combined with a significant interaction (F(36, 216) = 5.23; p < 0.001; partial η2 = 0.466), indicate that vertical processes, such as base cation leaching, Al3⁺ mobilization, and organic matter mineralization, modulate the chemical contrasts imposed by topography. These results are in line with the conceptual models proposed by Lu et al.69, who demonstrated that hydropedological gradients in agroecosystems influence soil functioning at the physicochemical and microbiological levels.

Specifically, zones with better drainage and greater organic matter retention exhibited enhanced representation of genes involved in nitrification, phosphatase activity, and organic matter decomposition, while hydromorphic zones with prolonged saturation showed reductions in these functions along with increases in genes linked to anaerobic pathways33. In the present study, the contrasts between upslope and downslope positions in pH, CEC, and base saturation correspond to similar changes in microbial functional potential, reinforcing that topography-driven chemical patterns have cascading effects on biogeochemical processes and nutrient turnover70.

At the univariate level, pH in CaCl₂ (Fig. 3) showed statistically significant differences with a high power of effect for the Upper Third (UT) in relation to the Middle Third (MT) (ΔM = 1.080; 95% CI [0.769; 1.391]; p < 0.001; d = 1.488), suggesting lower acidity in the highest slope positions. This was accompanied by a significant reduction in exchangeable Al3⁺ in UT compared with MT (ΔM = –1.800; 95% CI [–2.037; –1.563]; p < 0.001; d = –21.228) and in potential acidity (H⁺ + Al3⁺) (ΔM = –3.147; 95% CI [–3.603; –2.692]; p < 0.001; d = –19.282). Mechanistically, these patterns are consistent with reduced hydromorphic stress and improved aeration at upper slope positions, which limit Al3⁺ solubilization and acidification.

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

Adjusted means of soil chemical attributes by depth and topographic position, with horizontal error bars representing 95% confidence intervals of the marginal means.

Elevated positions also tend to accumulate more stable organic matter and reactive clay minerals, increasing the density of negative charges and enhancing cation retention71,72. According to Długosz & Piotrowska-Długosz73, this combination of organic and mineral surface activity not only elevates CEC but also sustains enzymatic activities involved in C and N turnover, reinforcing the chemical buffering capacity of these zones.

Consistently, UT exhibited significantly higher effective CEC (t) and potential CEC (T = SB + H⁺ + Al3⁺), with ΔM = 3.427 (95% CI [2.627; 4.228]; p < 0.001; d = 1.870) and ΔM = 4.775 (95% CI [4.075; 5.475]; p < 0.001; d = 1.803), respectively. These results may reflect a greater abundance of colloidal complexes and organo-mineral associations that stabilize negative charges and enhance base cation retention. Sujatha et al.71 and Yang et al.74 reported similar positive relationships between CEC, organic carbon, and clay content, with elevated topographic zones favoring the accumulation of both.

The positive difference in base saturation (V%) in UT compared to MT (+ 48.53%; CI 95% [43.050; 54.020]; p < 0.001; d = 1.783) and the lower aluminum saturation (m%) (ΔM = –57.88%; 95% CI [–66.000; –49.775]; p < 0.001; d = –19.921) confirm that topography strongly exerts control over the composition of the exchange complex. In upper slopes, lower susceptibility to seasonal water saturation maintains aerobic conditions, enhancing nutrient cycling and exchangeable base retention75. However, even in these more favorable zones, m% values exceeding 20% indicate persistent acidity constraints typical of highly weathered tropical soils.

In contrast, lower slope positions are likely affected by seasonal hydromorphia, which creates reducing conditions that mobilize Fe and Mn, increase Al3⁺ solubility, and immobilize phosphorus through precipitation or adsorption onto reduced iron surfaces. Crespo et al.76 documented similar patterns in hillside systems in northeastern Brazil, whereas Lu et al.69 demonstrated that such hydromorphic zones often exhibit reduced abundance of microbial functional genes associated with phosphorus solubilization and nitrification, decreasing nutrient bioavailability. In these contexts, management strategies such as targeted liming and controlled drainage could mitigate acidity and restore nutrient cycling efficiency77.

Differences between UT and MT persisted at 0.20–0.40 m for pH in CaCl₂ (ΔM = 1.147; 95% CI [0.837; 1.458]; p < 0.001; d = 1.930), suggesting greater buffering capacity at elevated positions. This buffering effect may be due to stable organo-mineral complexes with high ligand-binding capacity that slow acid cation mobility74. At 0.40–0.60 m, although mean pH remained slightly higher in cultivated upper slope soils, differences were not statistically significant (p > 0.05). This reflects a tendency toward chemical homogenization with depth, where ionic diffusion and vertical percolation dominate. Patrick et al.78 attributed similar depth patterns to gradual downward migration of alkalinity from surface horizons.

CEC values (t and T) declined sharply with depth, with maxima at 0–0.20 m. At this depth, UT exhibited statistically higher values than MT, indicating a greater concentration of negatively charged colloids, likely linked to higher organic matter inputs and reduced erosion losses. These patterns are consistent with conservation-oriented systems where surface stability enhances nutrient retention and microbial biomass N73. Potential acidity and Al3⁺ were also significantly lower at 0–0.20 m in UT relative to MT. In deeper layers, the trend toward lower acidity at upper positions persisted, even when not statistically significant, indicating weaker leaching and slower accumulation of exchangeable acidity in these profiles.

In the surface horizon, higher V% and lower m% in UT indicate a chemically more favorable environment, with greater availability of base cations and reduced Al3⁺ toxicity risk for roots79. Eshetu et al.80 emphasize that such favorable surface chemistry can amplify nutrient-use efficiency and support microbial functional networks. Similarly, Lu et al.69 reported that high CEC and balanced base saturation in agroforestry soils correlate with denser and more resilient microbial co-occurrence networks.

Physical attributes of the soil

For the physical attributes of the soil, the MANOVA results indicated statistically significant effects of topographic position, depth and the interaction between the two. The multivariate model showed significant values in the Pillai and Wilks’ tests, with Pillai’s Trace = 1.541; F(12, 96) = 4.830; p < 0.001 and Wilks’ Lambda = 0.092; F(12, 96) = 5.32; p < 0.001, confirming significant multivariate differences between the different positions along the toposequence.

Specifically, the topographic position factor had a significant effect on the set of physical attributes (F(16, 96) = 4.83; p < 0.001; partial η2 = 0.726), indicating that the spatial distribution of the soil’s physical structure can be modulated by the relief. The soil depth factor also significantly influenced the physical attributes (F(24, 96) = 2.48; p = 0.006; partial η2 = 0.341), although to a lesser extent. The interaction between topographic position and depth was also significant (F(48, 96) = 2.112; p = 0.001; partial η2 = 0.340).

At the univariate level, statistically significant effects in the different topographic positions were observed for microporosity between coarse aggregates (F(3, 36) = 22.06; p < 0.001; partial η2 = 0.648), cryptoporosity (F(3, 36) = 16.396; p < 0.001; partial η2 = 0.577) and total microporosity (F(3, 36) = 13.063; p < 0.001; partial η2 = 0.521), all with high effect sizes (partial η2 > 0.503). Other attributes also showed statistically significant effects as a function of the topographic position, with moderate to high effects: soil density (F(3, 36) = 8.65; p < 0.001; partial η2 = 0.419), total porosity (F(3, 36) = 7.29; p = 0.001; partial η2 = 0.378) and macroporosity (F(3, 36) = 6.181; p = 0.002; partial η2 = 0.340).

These findings indicate that smaller diameter porous fractions are particularly sensitive to position in the landscape, due to variations in soil structural stability, intensity of use and organic matter dynamics. This relationship is corroborated by Sarmiento-Soler et al.81, who showed that microporosity varies significantly depending on the vegetation cover and the relief, with greater stability in shaded areas and at high altitudes—highlighting the direct role of topography and management in the structural organization of fine pores. In addition, in toposequences, soils in elevated positions tend to exhibit less accumulation of fine particles, greater drainage, intensified biological activity and high levels of organic matter82. These conditions, combined with less anthropogenic disturbance, favor not only the preservation of the physical structure, but also the development of more functionally efficient porosity.

These characteristics contribute to greater pore connectivity and aggregate integrity, especially in soils under perennial vegetation, where root activity plays a fundamental role in maintaining soil architecture83. In addition, long-term organic fertilization promotes greater pore structure stability and pore connectivity, in contrast to management based on inorganic inputs84.

The distribution of pore diameter is also impacted by the content and quality of organic matter, modulating the retention and movement of water and gases in the soil85, while root growth tends to be more efficient in soils with greater macroporosity and lower penetration resistance, generally present in less compacted environments with greater structural stability (Zhou et al.86). As for the effects of stratification, no statistically significant differences were observed for the physical attributes analyzed: soil density (F(2, 36) = 0.14; p = 0.866; partial η2 = 0.008), total porosity (F(2, 36) = 0.81; p = 0.454; partial η2 = 0.043) and macroporosity (F(2, 36) = 0.11; p = 0.900; partial η2 = 0.006) showed no significant variation along the profile.

As for the Lower Third (LT), it showed statistically significant values for total porosity when compared to the Native Forest (NF), with an average difference of ΔM = −5.360 cm3 cm⁻3 (95% CI [−9.410; −1.310], p = 0.006; d = −0.920), which represents a reduction of approximately 10.5% in relation to the NF (Fig. 4). This result may be related to a restriction in total pore volume in the lower elevation areas, which is consistent with studies that identify greater compaction, lower porosity and lower biological activity in the lower positions of toposequences, which are generally subject to the deposition of fine particles and sediments34. In addition, studies show that low-altitude areas have lower stocks of organic matter and lower quality litter, resulting in greater susceptibility to structural compaction87.

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4

Physical attributes of the soil in an agroecological system of shaded coffee, in different positions of the toposequence, Taquaritinga do Norte, Pernambuco state, Brazil.

In terms of macroporosity, the comparison between LT and NF indicated a mean difference of ΔM = −1.940 cm3 cm⁻3 (95% CI [−4.550; 0.660], p = 0.204; d = −0.920), representing a relative reduction of approximately 31.1%. Although not statistically significant, this reduction is consistent with the tendency toward structural compaction in lower-slope positions, where geotechnical pressure and reduced input of structuring organic residues can decrease aggregate stability88.

Similar patterns were reported by Medeiros et al.89, who observed decreases in void ratio and increases in bulk density under progressive applied pressures, indicating the susceptibility of surface layers to compaction. These findings reinforce the importance of management practices that enhance organic residue inputs, such as no-till systems, which, however, may require periodic mechanical interventions (e.g., scarification) to mitigate compaction over time90. Furthermore, long-term adoption of no-till without corrective interventions can lead to subsurface compaction, as evidenced by Steponavičienė et al.91, necessitating subsoiling to restore structural quality and maintain productive sustainability.

Microporosity between aggregates was significantly higher in LT compared to NF (ΔM = 2.790 cm3 cm⁻3; 95% CI [0.520; 5.050], p = 0.011; d = 1.638), reflecting a relative increase of approximately 23.8%. This pattern may be related to changes in intermediate pore connectivity, possibly resulting from the reorganization of structural pores into isolated microcapillaries, limiting the preferential flow and redistribution of water in the profile. These findings are in line with observations by Nunes et al.92, who identified structural improvements in the pore distribution of soils under shaded coffee, especially in the meso and macro pore fractions, in contrast to open areas prone to compaction and pore segregation.

Principal component analysis—PCA

Principal Component Analysis (PCA) was applied to identify multivariate patterns between macronutrients (NT, K, Ca, Mg, TOC, C/N, P), evaluating the effects of topographic position. The first two components (PC1 and PC2) cumulatively explained 75.58% of the total variance (PC1: 56.86%; PC2: 18.72%), revealing distinct edaphic gradients.

PC1 emerged as the primary fertility axis, characterized by significant negative factor loadings for exchangeable bases (Ca2⁺: −0.443; Mg2⁺: −0.453; K⁺: −0.453) and total organic carbon (TOC: −0.392), with high spatial representativeness (cos2 > 0.611 for Ca, Mg, TOC). This component clearly discriminated preferential deposition in the Lower Third (LT), where samples exhibited negative coordinates (PC1 = −4.05 ± 0.54), aligning with the hydrological redistribution model of fine sediments and organic matter. In contrast, the Middle Third (MT: PC1 + 0.32 ± 0.12) and Upper Third (UT: PC1 −1.16 ± 0.19) showed lower base saturation and organic content, consistent with erosion processes on convex slopes.

PC2 was an independent geochemical axis, dominated by available phosphorus (P) with a maximum negative factor load (−0.631) and high representation (cos2 = 0.522). The segregation of P in relation to other nutrients (K⁺ = 0.241 in PC2) reflects its unique dynamics: low mobility due to preferential adsorption on Fe/Al oxides (constant > 103 L-kg-193,94;) and complexation with carboxylic groups of organic matter, ligand-promoted dissolution effect95.

This selective retention is confirmed by the unstratified topographic distribution with intra-tract variability > 40%, de-characterizing the dominant hydrological control observed in PC1. In addition, the C/N ratio showed a distinct signature in PC2 (cos2 = 0.137 vs. 0.081 in PC1), suggesting an association with local biogeochemical processes. The distribution of samples in multivariate space revealed patterns consistent with topographic influence.

The samples from the lower third (LT) were concentrated in regions with more negative PC1 values, indicating a greater accumulation of total nutrients, particularly exchangeable bases (Ca2⁺, Mg2⁺, K⁺) and organic carbon. This result is consistent with the convergence effect of fine materials and organic matter in the lower positions of the toposequence. In turn, the samples from the Middle Third (MT) and Upper Third (UT) tended to be distributed in regions with more positive PC1 values, suggesting lower nutrient accumulation and relative fertility.

The separation of phosphorus from other nutrients may be related to its low mobility in the soil and strong adsorption in specific mineral fractions, such as iron and aluminum oxides93,94, as well as complexation with functional groups in organic matter. Therefore, PC2 does not represent a simple axis of organic matter quality, as previously suggested, but rather a geochemical gradient regulated by specific interactions between phosphorus and the edaphic matrix.

For the physical attributes (Fig. 5b), Principal Component Analysis (PCA) revealed that the first two axes (PC1 and PC2) cumulatively explained 60.19% of the total variance (PC1: 38.46%; PC2: 21.74%). PC1 defined a gradient of soil structural organization, characterized by pronounced negative factor loadings for Total Porosity (−0.637) and Macroporosity (−0.527), contrasting with a positive contribution from Total Microporosity (0.559).

Fig. 5.

Fig. 5

Principal component analysis (PCA) projection of the samples on the plane defined by the first two principal components, (a) considering the soil macronutrients and (b) considering the soil physical attributes.

This result shows a combination of macropores and micropores, as evidenced by the high representativeness (cos2) of these variables in the Total Porosity (0.786) and Total Microporosity (0.604) components. Negative PC1 values were associated with soils with open porous architecture and could be attributed to the dominance of macropores, while positive values indicated a predominance of functional micropores for water retention, in line with the dual functionality model of porosity (Medeiros et al.89).

The second component (PC2) shows a gradient of mineral compaction and intra-particle porosity, with a significant positive factor load for Particle density (0.801) and negative for Textural microporosity (−0.551). This axis shows a differentiation between soil fractions with a higher content of heavy minerals and smaller volumes of internal micropores, typical of materials with less aggregation or a more compact structure.

The representation of particle density (cos2 = 0.697) and textural microporosity (cos2 = 0.330) in PC2 indicates that this component synthesizes fundamental contrasts in the structural organization of the soil, reflecting both the influence of the mineral matrix and the dynamics of fine pores. These results are in line with the findings of Dexter96, who demonstrated the intrinsic relationship between the particle density and the porosity architecture in mineral soils.

The expression of textural microporosity on this main axis corroborates the observations by Pires et al.97, who highlight the determining role of pores < 30 μm in water retention and structural stability. The asymmetry in the magnitudes of cos2 (greater for density than for microporosity) suggests, as proposed by Rabot et al.98, that mineralogical attributes often exert greater control over the overall structural variability of the soil than textural parameters of the micro-scale porosity.

In multivariate space, the distribution of samples revealed patterns which are consistent with topographic position. The samples from the Upper Third (UT) were concentrated in regions with more negative PC1 and PC2 values, indicating greater macroporosity, greater total porosity and lower particle density. This behavior may be compatible with conditions of lower compaction and greater structural stability, favored by the higher relief, better drainage and lower degree of anthropogenic disturbance.

On the other hand, the samples from the Lower Third (LT) were predominantly located in regions with positive PC1 and especially PC2 values. These values reflect environments with higher mineral density and fewer structural macropores. However, the higher levels of total organic carbon (TOC) observed in the LT suggest that the colluvial accumulation of organic matter contributes to the development of water retention micropores, justifying its association with total microporosity in the PC1 component.

This pattern may be the result of a functionally distinct porous organization, modulated by processes of redistribution of organic and mineral material in areas of lower altitude, often subject to hydromorphism and accumulation of fine particles.

These results indicate that the physical structure of the soil along the toposequence can be modulated both by processes related to the position on the slope and the deposition of organic matter, which affects the distribution and function of the porosity on different slopes, management systems and morphopedological contexts99. This topographic influence acts not only on the contribution of organic matter, but also on the degree of development of the profiles and the connectivity between the structural pores. Soils located on flatter surfaces, associated with sedimentary morphopedological compartments, tend to have a greater effective depth, continuous porosity and a more stable structure, while areas of greater slope and crystalline relief show shallower profiles, susceptible to compaction and porous disconnection100.

In addition, the chemical attributes showed gradients of fertility and accumulation of organic matter also influenced by topographic position, with a higher concentration of nutrients in the lower segments of the slope, as observed by Zhou et al.67.

Structure of edaphic interactions by network analysis

A visual inspection of Fig. 6 shows partial correlation networks that assess the conditional co-occurrence structure between soil physical, chemical and biological attributes across topographic positions, where blue edges indicate positive partial correlations and red edges indicate negative partial correlations, and edge thickness is proportional to the absolute association strength.

Fig. 6.

Fig. 6

Interaction networks between soil physicochemical attributes in different positions of the toposequence, with panels (a) Upper Third, (b) Middle Third, (c) Lower Third and (d) Native Forest, where blue edges indicate positive partial correlations and red edges indicate negative partial correlations, and edge thickness is proportional to the absolute association strength.

In the Upper Third (Fig. 6a), the network analysis reveals a modular architecture with high functional integration among chemical attributes, characteristic of well-drained soils at higher topographic positions. The formation of a cohesive cation exchange core stands out, in which effective CEC (t) shows strong interdependence with exchangeable calcium (Ca2⁺; weight = 0.600) and potassium (K⁺; weight = 0.408), reflecting synergy in ion retention processes mediated by the permanent charge of clay soils (Brady and Weil101). This electrostatic cohesion suggests greater efficiency in fertility mechanisms, with chemical stability favored by drainage (Fontes102).

This behavior may be related to total organic carbon (TOC) acting as a key integrating element, thus establishing positive connections with Ca2⁺ (weight = 0.268) through calcium-bridge complexation103, association with pH (weight = 0.031) due to the buffering capacity of organic matter, and a negative relationship with K⁺ (weight = –0.044) due to competition for adsorption sites in 2:1 clays (Sparks104).

The absence of direct links between TOC and exchangeable aluminium (Al3⁺) or phosphorus (P) indicates functional compartmentalization, suggesting that (i) aluminium toxicity is mitigated by high base saturation independent of organic matter, and (ii) phosphorus dynamics operate in subsystems dissociated from organic cycling105. This pattern reflects the vertical stratification of biogeochemical processes in toposequences, where oxidative conditions favor the specialization of edaphic pathways (Lal106).

In the Middle Third (Fig. 6b), cohesion of the chemical core persisted, with significant connections between TOC and Ca2⁺ (0.438), TOC and base saturation (V%) (0.376), and V% and aggregate microporosity (0.371). The interaction between TOC and total N was evidenced by the correlation between TOC and K⁺ (0.614), indicating an association between organic stocks and essential cation availability. The BSR, represented indirectly through TOC and pore attributes, maintained low connectivity. Negative relationships were evident, such as Al3⁺–K⁺ (–0.229), signaling chemical antagonism between acidity and nutrient availability in intermediate slope environments.

In the Lower Third (Fig. 6c), there is a reduction in the network density, reflected by greater topological dispersion and reduced inter-nodal cohesion compared to the Upper and Middle Thirds. Despite this general destructuring, the core of chemical interactions maintained its integrity, as evidenced by strong associations between Cation Exchange Capacity (CEC) and organic matter content (TOC, weight = 0.134) and between CEC and microporosity (weight = 0.181).

TOC exhibited differential connectivity, showing moderate associations with exchangeable calcium (Ca2⁺, weight = 0.390) and pH (weight = 0.183), but no connections with available phosphorus (P) and exchangeable aluminum (Al3⁺).

This pattern may demonstrate functional fragmentation of the edaphic processes at lower altitudes, where traditional fertility mechanisms, P cycling, and Al3⁺ neutralization are dissociated from organic matter dynamics107,108. Exchangeable potassium (K⁺) showed topological isolation, without significant connections with acid–base variables (pH, Al3⁺), structural attributes (microporosity), or organic matter indicators (TOC).

This structural disconnection indicates that K⁺ dynamics are decoupled from main edaphic controls in the landscape, reflecting intrinsic restrictions of hydromorphic environments. This structural isolation of potassium may be associated with edaphic processes characteristic of hydromorphic environments: water saturation promotes intensified leaching, drastically reducing K⁺ retention in the soil matrix109, while ionic competition at exchange sites allows Al3⁺ and H⁺ to suppress potassium adsorption110,111. In addition, microbial activity is further compromised, limiting the biogeochemical cycling of the nutrient (Fageria and Stone112).

For the Native Forest (Fig. 6d), the network structure displayed higher connection density and topological complexity. The core involving CEC (t), Ca2⁺, and base saturation (V%) was maintained, with edge weights of 0.434, 0.625, and 0.581, respectively. TOC was highly connected to P (0.581), Ca2⁺ (0.390), and Al saturation (–0.442), suggesting greater integration between the chemical functionality and organic matter quality in systems under perennial cover.

Also, for the Native Forest, the negative edge between Al3⁺ and K⁺ (weight = –0.229) may be related to a functional antagonism relationship: in contexts of greater acidity (greater presence of Al3⁺), exchangeable K⁺ availability tends to be lower. This association may be related to competition between cations for the exchange complex and to aluminum toxicity, which can inhibit root uptake of K⁺, as observed in acid tropical systems.

Conversely, the positive link observed between Al3⁺ and Ca2⁺ (weight = 0.398) suggests that, in certain conserved edaphic contexts, functional coexistence of acidic and basic cations is possible. In experiments related to similar management, this association may result from joint adsorption processes on colloidal surfaces or simultaneous release during mineral weathering. Previous studies have shown that ions such as Ca2⁺ and Al3⁺ can share adsorption sites on clays, manganese oxides, and aluminosilicates, indicating synergistic interaction on reactive surfaces113115. In addition, coprecipitation mechanisms or ionic exchanges involving Ca–Al-containing compounds, such as lamellar double hydroxides, may contribute to this functional association116.

The positive connection between pH and available phosphorus (P) (weight = 0.085) reflects the known dependence of P availability on soil acidity117. At higher pH (less acidic), phosphorus fixation by iron and aluminum oxides is reduced, increasing its concentration in the soil solution118. Although moderate in weight, this edge indicates a persistent relationship even after controlling for Al3⁺, TOC, and Ca2⁺ effects, denoting a conditional association between pH and P, characteristic of chemically stable soils under perennial vegetation34.

The higher connections observed in the upper segments and in the native vegetation indicate greater structural cohesion and functional capacity, whereas the Lower Third networks reveal vulnerability to fragmentation, likely induced by hydromorphia, compaction, or surface runoff34. The connectivity between TOC and Ca2⁺, and its absence with Al3⁺, reinforces the hypothesis that organic matter acts as a structural axis for chemical interactions in conserved environments, as also suggested by Mabagala and Mng’ong’o119.

As shown in the weighting matrix (Fig. 7), the Upper Third (UT) and Native Forest (NF) exhibited predominant connections among key variables such as Total Organic Carbon (TOC), Calcium (Ca2⁺), Base Saturation (V%) and Effective CEC, which indicates a more integrated and functional chemical structure. These connections support the central role of organic matter as a mediator of chemical and structural interactions, possibly favored by greater inputs of plant residues and reduced mechanical disturbance in these areas.

Fig. 7.

Fig. 7

Centrality measures for soil physicochemical attributes in networks constructed for different toposequence positions: Upper Third (red), Middle Third (green), Lower Third (blue), and Native Forest (purple). The metrics presented are: Closeness, Betweenness, Strength, and Expected Influence. Note: Centrality metrics were computed for each network and standardized (z-score) within each topographic position to allow comparison across variables. Colors represent topographic positions: UT = Upper Third, MT = Middle Third, LT = Lower Third, NF = Native Forest. Metrics shown are Closeness, Betweenness, Strength, and Expected Influence.

In contrast, the network in the Lower Third (LT) showed reduced connection density and a predominance of weaker associations, especially involving TOC, Ca2⁺, and macroporosity, indicating a possible functional fragmentation of the attribute network. This disconnection may be attributed to processes such as hydromorphy, surface compaction, and lateral runoff, which reduce the continuity between physical and chemical processes, compromising soil structural functionality.

In addition, there was little or no connection between TOC and Al3⁺ in all four positions, indicating a functional disconnection between organic matter and potentially toxic ionic species, consistent with the stabilizing role of organic matter in conserved environments. This pattern reinforces that, even under conditions of partial degradation, organic matter tends to maintain functional selectivity in interactions with cations, prioritizing base cations such as Ca2⁺ and suppressing bonds with Al3⁺, as evidenced by previous studies.

Conclusions

This study demonstrates that topographic position is a primary driver of soil physical and chemical heterogeneity in shaded coffee agroforestry systems, with slope position explaining over 70% of soil variability. Upper slope positions exhibited superior structural quality, characterized by higher macroporosity and lower bulk density, whereas lower slope positions showed organic carbon accumulation and dominance of microporosity, reflecting distinct pedological processes along the toposequence.

Network analysis identified total organic carbon (TOC) as the central integrator of soil functions, displaying the strongest connectivity with base saturation, cation exchange capacity, and structural attributes across all topographic positions. This finding reinforces the role of TOC as a multifunctional regulator in hillside coffee systems, influencing not only nutrient cycling but also physical structure and chemical buffering capacity.

These results have direct implications for coffee agroforestry management. Farmers should consider topographic position when implementing soil conservation practices, with erosion control measures prioritized in upper slopes and organic matter management emphasized in lower slopes. The identification of key soil indicators through network analysis provides a framework for efficient soil monitoring programs, focusing resources on parameters with the greatest influence on overall soil functionality. The shaded agroforestry approach demonstrated measurable advantages over conventional systems, particularly in maintaining cation exchange capacity and reducing aluminum toxicity in upper slope positions.

Study limitations include the single-site scope, cross-sectional design, and absence of direct measurements of microbial functional dynamics. Future research should expand to multiple sites and climatic zones, incorporate microbial profiling to elucidate biological mechanisms underlying TOC-mediated processes, evaluate economic feasibility of topography-specific interventions, and assess system resilience under projected climate change scenarios. These advances would strengthen the scientific foundation for precision management in tropical coffee agroecosystems.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary Material 1 (27.6KB, docx)

Author contributions

C.M.G.C. (Cristiane Maria Gonçalves Crespo) – Investigation; Data curation; Formal analysis; Writing – original draft. V.C.P. (Victor Casimiro Piscoya) – Conceptualization; Methodology; Supervision; Writing – review & editing. R.C.P.M. (Robson Carlos Pereira de Melo) – Investigation; Fieldwork; Data curation. L.M.P. (Ludmilla Morais Pereira) – Formal analysis; Visualization; Writing – review & editing. L.D.V.S. (Luiz Diego Vidal Santos) – Conceptualization; Methodology; Statistical analysis; Writing – original draft; Writing – review & editing; Project administration. F.S.R.H. (Francisco Sandro Rodrigues Holanda) – Funding acquisition; Resources; Supervision. A.P. (Alceu Pedrotti) – Resources; Supervision; Writing – review & editing. S.A.B.S. (Savanna Alice Botelho da Silva) – Investigation; Laboratory analyses; Data curation. M.C.F. (Moacyr Cunha Filho) – Formal analysis; Statistical modeling; Validation. R.N.A.F. (Renisson Neponuceno de Araújo Filho) – Conceptualization; Methodology; Supervision; Writing – review & editing.

Funding

This work was supported by the Coordination for the Improvement of Higher Education Personnel (CAPES) and the National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq).

Data availability

The datasets generated and/or analysed during the current study are available in the Open Science Framework (OSF) repository at 10.17605/OSF.IO/CY5DU.

Declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Footnotes

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

References

  • 1.CONAB. Monitoring the Brazilian coffee crop: coffee. (2017).
  • 2.Fassio, F. & Silva, M. Socioeconomic importance of brazilian coffee growing. Coffee Sci10, 1–8 (2015). [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Lal, R. Restoring soil quality to mitigate soil degradation. Sustainability7, 5875–5895 (2015). [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Gupta, G. S. Land degradation and challenges of food security. Rev Eur Stud11, 63 (2019). [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Harmand, J.-M., Avila, G. & Vilarino, A. Effects of coffee monoculture and agroforestry systems on soil properties. Agrofor. Syst.69, 1–13 (2007). [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Sauvadet, M. et al. High pathogen diversity inside agroforestry systems: Consequences for pest and disease control. Agr. Ecosyst. Environ.289, 106734 (2019). [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Ferreira, O. J. M., Holanda, F. S. R., Pedrotti, A., Vidal Santos, L. D. & Silva-Mann, R. Root system of jatrophacurcas provides resistance and strength to the soil. Commun Soil Sci Plant Anal53, 2955–2967 (2022). [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Blanco-Sepúlveda, R. et al. Water erosion in coffee plantations: Effects of soil cover in agroforestry systems. Geoderma434, 116490 (2024). [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Baveye, P. C., Dominati, E., Grêt-Regamey, A. & Vogel, H.-J. Editorial: Assessment and modeling of soil functions or soil-based ecosystem services: Theory and applications to practical problems. Front Environ Sci9, 797933 (2021). [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Magdoff, F. Concept, components, and strategies of soil health in agroecosystems. J. Nematol.33, 169–172 (2001). [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.de Carvalho, A. F. et al. Microclimate and soil and water loss in shaded and unshaded agroforestry coffee systems. Agrofor. Syst.95, 119–134 (2020). [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Gomes, L. C. et al. Agroforestry systems can mitigate the impacts of climate change on coffee production: A spatially explicit assessment in brazil. Agr. Ecosyst. Environ.294, 106858 (2020). [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Jawo, T. O., Negash, M., Teutscherová, N. & Lojka, B. Perennial species diversity, ecosystem carbon stocks and carbon income in coffee-based agroforestry systems along an elevation gradient in south-eastern ethiopia. Geoderma Reg.39, e00861 (2024). [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Bhat, N., Kalro, B. N., Gopakumar, B., Krishnamurthy, M. N. & Ravikanth, G. Shade trees improve soil biological and microbial diversity in coffee based system in western ghats of india. J. Plant. Crop.45, 104–114 (2017). [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Höfer, H. et al. Soil organic matter, microbial biomass and enzyme activities in a tropical agroforestry system. Biol. Fertil. Soils33, 335–343 (2001). [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Muchane, M. N. et al. Enhancing agroecosystem productivity with woody perennials in semi-arid west africa: A meta-analysis. Agron. Sustain. Dev.40, 1–14 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Hidayat, F. et al. The effect of tree shading on soil temperature at arabica coffee plantation (coffeaarabica l.). IOP Conf Ser: Earth Environ Sci1297, 012029 (2024). [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Six, J., Elliott, E. T. & Paustian, K. Soil structure and organic matter: I. Distribution of aggregate-size classes and aggregate-associated carbon. Soil Sci Soc Am J64, 681–689 (2002). [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Chenu, C., Cosentino, D. & Lamy, I. Microbial-derived organic matter plays a major role in soil aggregation. Soil Biol. Biochem.136, 107521 (2019).31700196 [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Ades, P. K., Smith, S. E. & Smith, F. A. Glomalin and other hydrophobic proteins in soils: Their role in aggregate stability and carbon sequestration. Appl. Soil. Ecol.79, 56–64 (2014). [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Tisdall, J. M. & Oades, J. M. Organic matter and water-stable aggregates in soils. J. Soil Sci.33, 141–163 (1982). [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Rillig, M. C. et al. Estimating the contribution of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi to soil carbon sequestration in grasslands: A meta-analysis. Soil Biol. Biochem.42, 540–549 (2010). [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Kazmierczak, R. et al. Selection of indicators to discriminate tillage systems and evaluate soil quality in a red latosol. Braz Arch Biol Technol63, e20190489 (2020). [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Villegas-Acuña, B., Prieditis, N., Sebesvari, Z. & Quintero-Dallos, G. An assessment of the shade and ground cover influence on the mitigation of water-driven soil erosion in a coffee agroforestry system. Agric. For. Meteorol.306, 109373 (2024). [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Oliveira, R. C., Reis, R. P., Reis, M. C., Salviano, A. M. & Minette, L. J. Cover crops in between-rows of coffea canephora for reduction of soil erosion. Rev. Bras. Ciênc. Solo47, e0230015 (2023). [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Duiker, S. W., Flanagan, D. C. & Lal, R. Effectiveness of residue and tillage management on runoff pollutant reduction from agricultural areas. J. Environ. Qual.52, 507–521 (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Piato, K. et al. Effects of shade trees on robusta coffee growth, yield and quality. A meta-analysis. Agron Sustain Dev40(6), 38 (2020). [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Liu, S. et al. The effect of leaf litter cover on surface runoff and soil erosion in northern china. PLoS ONE9, e107789 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Ziegler, A. D., Giambelluca, T. W., Sutherland, R. A., Nullet, M. A. & Brekke, L. G. Coffee husk mulch on soil erosion and runoff: Experiences under rainfall simulation experiment. Soil Tillage Res138, 60–69 (2014). [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Tully, K., Wood, S. & Lawrence, D. The role of trees in regulating soil health in agroforestry systems. Agr. Ecosyst. Environ.295, 106882 (2020). [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Meylan, G., Porres, M. C., Prieto-López, J. & Jauregui, L. Exchangeable aluminum assessment in acid soils of central america: An intercomparison of extraction methods. Geoderma300, 64–72 (2017). [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Sartori, A. A. et al. Toposequence and soil structural stability in mountainous agroecosystems. Geoderma375, 114513 (2020). [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Weintraub, S. R. et al. Topographic controls on soil nitrogen availability in a lowland tropical forest. Ecology96, 1561–1574 (2015). [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Yao, Y. et al. Distribution of soil physical and hydraulic properties between erosion and deposition topographies in five small catchments from north to south on the loess plateau of china. CATENA222, 106891 (2023). [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Chang, J., Zhu, Y., Li, Z. & Pan, X. Changes in soil aggregate stability and aggregate-associated carbon under different slope positions in a karst region of southwest china. CATENA237, 107868 (2024). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Liu, Z., Li, Y. & Ding, L. Spatial variation in soil aggregate stability and erodibility at different slope positions in four hilly regions of northeast china. Soil Tillage Res242, 105968 (2024). [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Rocha Junior, P. R., Valadares Coelho, M. L. A. & Souchie, E. L. Soil microbiological attributes under different vegetation covers. Rev. Bras. Ciênc. Solo44, e0190103 (2020). [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Veloso, A., Rech, I. & Rech, R. The impact and determinants of mountainous topographical factors on soil microbial community characteristics. Microorganisms11, 2845 (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Li, D., Xu, X., Liu, Q. & Wang, H. Spatial variation in soil physico-chemical properties along slope position in a small agricultural watershed scale. Agronomy11, 2065 (2022). [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Karlen, D. L. & Stott, D. E. A framework for evaluating farming practices and soil quality. Am. J. Altern. Agric.19, 20–30 (2004). [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Lehmann, J., Bossio, D. A., Kögel-Knabner, I. & Rillig, M. C. The contentious nature of soil organic matter. Nature528, 60–68 (2020). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Ellis, N. R. & Ramankutty, N. Systematic review of soil ecosystem services in tropical regions. Proc. R. Soc. B288, 20202369 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Mbuthia, L. W. et al. Mapping the conceptual and intellectual structure of soil health research (1996–2021): A terms co-occurrence and co-cited reference network analysis. Front Agron8, 1234567 (2025). [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Karlen, D. L. et al. Conceptual and practical challenges of assessing soil quality. Soil Tillage Res242, 105972 (2024). [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Mukherjee, A. & Lal, R. Identification of sensitive indicators to assess the interrelationship between soil quality, management practices and human health. Soil Tillage Res140, 2–11 (2014). [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Lazzaretti, G. et al. Impact of different agricultural and forestry systems on the chemical and biological quality of soil on a rural property. J Environ Manag Sustain8, 330–350 (2019). [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Bastida, F. et al. Soil microbial diversity–biomass relationships are driven by soil carbon content across global biomes. ISME J.15, 2081–2091 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Blanco-Sepúlveda, R. et al. An assessment of the shade and ground cover influence on the mitigation of water-driven soil erosion in a coffee agroforestry system. Agrofor. Syst.98, 1771–1782 (2024). [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Santos, H. G. et al. Brazilian soil classification system (National Center for Soil Research, 2018). [Google Scholar]
  • 50.K"oppen, W. Das geographische system der klimate. (1936).
  • 51.de Souza, J. G. et al. Estimating litter production in agroforests and its role in soil carbon sequestration. Revista de Gestão Social e Ambiental19, e011676 (2025). [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Pandey, A. K., Singh, P. K. & Bhushan, C. Effects of neem oil and phyto-extract of lantana camara on spodopterafrugiperda (lepidoptera: Noctuidae), corn pest in bankim, adamawa–cameroon. Int J Agric, Environ Biotechnol13, 81–87 (2020). [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Bhattarai, S. et al. Comparative study of various botanical and chemical pesticides against red pumpkin beetle (aulacophorafoveicollis) in summer squash at Bhojpur, Nepal. Arch Agric Environ Sci10, 512–516 (2025). [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Jonckheere, I. et al. Review of methods for in situ leaf area index determination. Agric. For. Meteorol.121, 19–35 (2004). [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Gee, G. W. & Or, D. Particle-size analysis. in methods of soil analysis: Part 4 physical methods 255–293 (Soil Science Society of America, Madison, WI, 2002).
  • 56.Grossman, R. B. & Reinsch, T. G. 2.1 bulk density and linear extensibility. (2018).
  • 57.Teixeira, P. C., Donagemma, G. K., Fontana, A. & Teixeira, W. G. Manual of soil analysis methods. (National center for soil research (Embrapa Solos), Brasília, DF, 2017).
  • 58.Huan, H., Tanyu, B. P. & Dzombak, B. Soil structure and soil hydraulic properties. in Soil and rock behavior and modeling 128–135 (american society of civil engineers, Reston, VA, 2021). 10.1016/B978-0-12-822974-3.00225-1.
  • 59.Nimmo, J. R. Porosity and pore size distribution. In Encyclopedia of soils in the environment 295–303 (Elsevier, Oxford, 2004). 10.1016/S0065-2113(08)60577-5.
  • 60.Prevedello, C. L. Soil physical and chemical characterization under different management systems (Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, 1996). [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Cohen, J. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. (2013). 10.4324/9780203771587.
  • 62.Team, R. C. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. (2024).
  • 63.Foygel, R. & Drton, M. Extended bayesian information criteria for gaussian graphical models. (2010).
  • 64.Opsahl, T., Agneessens, F. & Skvoretz, J. Node centrality in weighted networks: Generalizing degree and shortest paths. Soc Netw32, 245–251 (2010). [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Epskamp, S., Borsboom, D. & Fried, E. I. Estimating psychological networks and their accuracy: A tutorial paper. Behav. Res. Methods50, 195–212 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.De Souza, M. C. M. R., Sobrinho, J. F. & Barbosa, F. E. L. Characterization of soil fertility at different relief points in a humid residual massif in the state of ceará. Revista de Gestão Social e Ambiental17, e04155 (2023). [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Zhou, W., Li, C., Zhao, W., Stringer, L. C. & Fu, B. Spatial distributions of soil nutrients affected by land use, topography and their interactions, in the loess plateau of china. Int Soil Water Conserv Res12, 227–239 (2024). [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Bilotto, F., Vibart, R., Mackay, A., Costall, D. & Harrison, M. T. Towards an integrated phosphorus, carbon and nitrogen cycling model for topographically diverse grasslands. Nutr. Cycl. Agroecosyst.124, 153–172 (2022). [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Lu, P. et al. Metagenomic insights into carbon, nitrogen, and phosphorus cycling in a no-till intercropping system. Plant Soil513, 1247–1264 (2025). [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Ding, J. & Yu, S. Impacts of land use on soil nitrogen-cycling microbial communities: Insights from community structure, functional gene abundance, and network complexity. Life15, 466 (2025). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Sujatha, D. V. et al. Relation of soil properties to landscape position: A transect study in a part of pinneru river basin, YSR kadapa district, andhra pradesh. Arab J Geosci14(16), 1648 (2021). [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Solly, E. F. et al. A critical evaluation of the relationship between the effective cation exchange capacity and soil organic carbon content in Swiss forest soils. Front Forests Glob Change3, 98 (2020). [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Długosz, J. & Piotrowska-Długosz, A. Soil n-related properties under soybean (glycine max l. Merrill) cultivation as affected by different soil tillage systems and seasonal changes. Soil Use Manag40(4), e13138 (2024). [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Yang, J. et al. Land use and soil type exert strongly interactive impacts on the pH buffering capacity of acidic soils in south china. Sustainability14, 12891 (2022). [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Rasmussen, C., Dahlgren, R. A. & Southard, R. J. Basalt weathering and pedogenesis across an environmental gradient in the southern cascade range, california, USA. Geoderma154, 473–485 (2010). [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Crespo, C. M. G. et al. Soil carbon stocks and labile fractions of organic matter under agroforestry system in breast of pernambucan altitude. Ciência Florestal32, 2180–2198 (2022). [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Alves, G. B., de Oliveira, F. S., da Silva, A. H. N. & de Souza, V. S. Toposequence: What are we talking about?. Rev. Bras. Ciênc. Solo48, e0230137 (2024). [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Patrick, U. I., Noma, S. S. & Ikpe, E. Characterization and classification of soil along a toposequence and its implications on crop production in dundaye district sokoto, nigeria. Int J Weather, Clim Change Conserv Res10, 21–41 (2024). [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Whitley, A. E., Moir, J. L. & Almond, P. C. A meta-analysis of exchangeable aluminium in new zealand soils using the national soils database. Soil Res57, 113–123 (2019). [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Eshetu, M., Wogi, L. & Demissie, N. Soil fertility assessment and mapping under different land use types along toposequence at danka watershed in dinsho districts of bale highland oromia, Southeastern Ethiopia. Int J Plant Soil Sci36, 847–872 (2024). [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Sarmiento-Soler, A. et al. Disentangling effects of altitude and shade cover on coffee fruit dynamics and vegetative growth in smallholder coffee systems. Agr. Ecosyst. Environ.326, 107786 (2022). [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Ács, P.-B. et al. RESULTS REGARDING THE INFLUENCE OF GREEN MANURE USAGE ON MAIZE CROP ON ACIDIC SOILS IN THE NORTHWEST OF THE COUNTRY. ANNALS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CRAIOVA, Biology, Horticulture, Food products processing technology, Environmental engineering29, (2024).
  • 83.Lee, J. H., Geers-Lucas, M., Guber, A. K. & Kravchenko, A. N. Pore structures in detritusphere of soils under switchgrass and restored prairie vegetation community. Land Degrad Dev10.1002/ldr.5333 (2024). [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Ruan, R. et al. Variable responses of soil pore structure to organic and inorganic fertilization in a vertisol. Int Agrophys35, 221–225 (2021). [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Robinson, D. A. et al. Analytical modelling of soil porosity and bulk density across the soil organic matter and land-use continuum. Sci Rep12(1), 7085 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Zhou, H. et al. The interaction between wheat roots and soil pores in structured field soil. J. Exp. Bot.72, 747–756 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Djukic, I., Zehetner, F., Tatzber, M. & Gerzabek, M. H. Soil organic-matter stocks and characteristics along an alpine elevation gradient. J. Plant Nutr. Soil Sci.173, 30–38 (2010). [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Sharma, J. et al. Conservation agriculture: A long-term approach towards sustainability. Int J Environ Climate Change13, 150–165 (2023). [Google Scholar]
  • 89.Medeiros, A. R., Câmara Júnior, C. L., Pereira, J. O., de Oliveira, F. A. & Amaro Filho, J. Avaliação da compactação do solo por meio de um ensaio oedometrico. Revista Verde de Agroecologia e Desenvolvimento Sustentável10, 09 (2015). [Google Scholar]
  • 90.de Santos, J. et al. Impacts of the tillage systems on the production of green corn (zeamays l.) in long-term plots in Northeastern Brazil. Soil Use Manag40(2), e13061 (2024). [Google Scholar]
  • 91.Steponavičienė, V., Žiūraitis, G., Rudinskienė, A., Jackevičienė, K. & Bogužas, V. Long-term effects of different tillage systems and their impact on soil properties and crop yields. Agronomy14, 870 (2024). [Google Scholar]
  • 92.Nunes, A. L. P. et al. Soil morphostructural characterization and coffee root distribution under agroforestry system with hevea Brasiliensis. Scientia Agricola78, e20190150 (2021). [Google Scholar]
  • 93.Azevedo, R. P., Salcedo, I. H., Lima, P. A., da Silva Fraga, V. & Lana, R. M. Q. Mobility of phosphorus from organic and inorganic source materials in a sandy soil. Int J Recycl Organic Waste Agric7, 153–163 (2018). [Google Scholar]
  • 94.Négrel, P. et al. GEMAS: phosphorus in european agricultural soil - sources versus sinks at the continental-scale—the geological perspective. Sci. Total Environ.930, 172524 (2024). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 95.Almeida, J. P. et al. Desorption of mineral-bound phosphorus across different cropping systems and agronomic strategies to promote efficient input use. Appl. Soil. Ecol.203, 105672 (2024). [Google Scholar]
  • 96.Dexter, A. R. Soil physical quality. Geoderma120, 201–214 (2004). [Google Scholar]
  • 97.Pires, L. F. et al. Soil structure changes induced by tillage systems. Soil and Tillage Res165, 66–79 (2017). [Google Scholar]
  • 98.Rabot, E., Wiesmeier, M., Schlüter, S. & Vogel, H.-J. Soil structure as an indicator of soil functions: A review. Geoderma314, 122–137 (2018). [Google Scholar]
  • 99.Yuan, Y. et al. Spatial variation of soil physical properties and its relationship with plant biomass in degraded slopes in dry-hot valley region of southwest china. J. Soils Sediments20, 2354–2366 (2020). [Google Scholar]
  • 100.da Santos, A. S., De Lira, D. I., de Costa, T. S. B., Da Rocha, D. F. & do Lopes, D. V. Interações pedogeomorfológicas na bacia hidrográfica do rio piranhas-açu, no semiárido brasileiro. Revista Brasileira de Geografia Física16, 1776–1792 (2023). [Google Scholar]
  • 101.Weil, R. & Brady, N. The nature and properties of soils. (2017).
  • 102.Fontes, M. Behavior of heavy metals in soils: Individual and multiple competitive adsorption. Compet Sorpt Trans Heavy Metals Soils Geol Media10.1201/b13041-4 (2012). [Google Scholar]
  • 103.Rowley, M. C., Grand, S. & Verrecchia, É. P. Calcium-mediated stabilisation of soil organic carbon. Biogeochemistry137, 27–49 (2017). [Google Scholar]
  • 104.Sparks, D. L. Kinetics of soil chemical processes (Academic Press, 2013). [Google Scholar]
  • 105.Guppy, C. N., Menzies, N. W., Moody, P. W. & Blamey, F. P. C. Competitive sorption reactions between phosphorus and organic matter in soil: A review. Soil Res43, 189–202 (2005). [Google Scholar]
  • 106.Lal, R. Encyclopedia of soil science (CRC Press, 2017). [Google Scholar]
  • 107.Six, J., Bossuyt, H., Degryze, S. & Denef, K. A history of research on the link between (micro)aggregates, soil biota, and soil organic matter dynamics. Soil Tillage Res79, 7–31 (2004). [Google Scholar]
  • 108.Antonangelo, J. A. et al. Phosphorus speciation by p-XANES in an oxisol under long-term no-till cultivation. Geoderma377, 114580 (2020). [Google Scholar]
  • 109.Alfaro, M. A., Jarvis, S. C. & Gregory, P. J. Factors affecting potassium leaching in different soils. Soil Use Manag.20, 182–189 (2004). [Google Scholar]
  • 110.Ulery, A. L. Handbook of soil sciences second edition (two volume set). Soil Sci Soc Am J.76, 1507–1507 (2012). [Google Scholar]
  • 111.Huang, W., Gonzalez, G. & Zou, X. Earthworm abundance and functional group diversity regulate plant litter decay and soil organic carbon level: A global meta-analysis. Appl. Soil Ecol.150, 103473. 10.1016/j.apsoil.2019.103473 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 112.Fageria, N. K. & Stone, L. F. Physical, chemical, and biological changes in the rhizosphere and nutrient availability. J. Plant Nutr.29, 1327–1356 (2006). [Google Scholar]
  • 113.Liu, J. et al. Evaluation of u(VI) adsorption from ca2+ coexisted bicarbonate solution by synthetic inorganic and mineral materials. Radiochim. Acta108, 955–965 (2020). [Google Scholar]
  • 114.Szymanek, K., Charmas, R. & Piasecki, W. Investigations of mechanism of Ca2+ adsorption on silica and alumina based on ca-ISE monitoring, potentiometric titration, electrokinetic measurements and surface complexation modeling. Adsorption27, 105–115 (2020). [Google Scholar]
  • 115.Chen, M., Xie, Z., Yang, Y., Gao, B. & Wang, J. Effects of calcium on arsenate adsorption and arsenate/iron bioreduction of ferrihydrite in stimulated groundwater. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health19, 3465 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 116.Qiu, S. et al. Adsorption performance and mechanism of ca–al-LDHs prepared by oyster shell and pop can for phosphate from aqueous solutions. J. Environ. Manage.303, 114235 (2022). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 117.Johan, P. D., Ahmed, O. H., Omar, L. & Hasbullah, N. A. Phosphorus transformation in soils following co-application of charcoal and wood ash. Agronomy11, 2010 (2021). [Google Scholar]
  • 118.Barrow, N. J. The effects of pH on phosphate uptake from the soil. Plant Soil410, 401–410 (2016). [Google Scholar]
  • 119.Mabagala, F. S. & Mngongo, M. E. On the tropical soils; the influence of organic matter (OM) on phosphate bioavailability. Saudi J Biol Sci29, 3635–3641 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary Material 1 (27.6KB, docx)

Data Availability Statement

The datasets generated and/or analysed during the current study are available in the Open Science Framework (OSF) repository at 10.17605/OSF.IO/CY5DU.


Articles from Scientific Reports are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES