Skip to main content

This is a preprint.

It has not yet been peer reviewed by a journal.

The National Library of Medicine is running a pilot to include preprints that result from research funded by NIH in PMC and PubMed.

bioRxiv logoLink to bioRxiv
[Preprint]. 2026 Mar 14:2026.03.11.711170. [Version 1] doi: 10.64898/2026.03.11.711170

Alveolar-Basal Intermediates Drive Pulmonary Fibrosis via Coordination of a Pro-Fibrotic Signaling Niche in Silicosis

Barbara Zhao 1,2,3, Helen I Warheit-Niemi 3,4, Kathleen C S Cook 3,4, Lori Pitstick 6, Andrea Toth 1,2,3, Amber Elitz 1,2,3, Francis X McCormack 6,7, Amanda L Zacharias 3,4,5,$, William J Zacharias 3,4,5,6,7,$,*
PMCID: PMC13061004  PMID: 41959009

Abstract

Pulmonary fibrosis is a progressive, terminal disease with high mortality. Existing therapeutics are capable of slowing disease progression but are unable to reverse fibrotic lung remodeling, accentuating the importance of studying the mechanisms that underlie lung resilience and repair during fibrosis. Recent literature has suggested that alveolar type 2 (AT2) progenitors undergo transition to stressed Krt8high cells following lung injury. Accumulation of these stressed Krt8high cells has been observed in multiple acute and chronic lung diseases, particularly pulmonary fibrosis. Whether accumulation of Krt8high cells is a direct driver of fibrosis or an epiphenomenon of lung injury remains unclear. We have previously described a genetic model causing transition of AT2 progenitors to a Krt8high cell state following deletion of the lung transcription factor Nkx2–1 specifically in the AT2 progenitor lineage. Here, we use this tractable model of genetic Krt8high cell accumulation to directly evaluate the pathogenic influence of Krt8high cells which are present at the onset of lung fibrosis. Building on recent data, we show that these Nkx2–1−/− Krt8high cells accumulate in a Krt7high/Krt19high/Krt17neg alveolar-basal intermediate state (ABI). Following induction of fibrotic lung injury with inhaled silica, these ABI enter a unique inflammatory state (iABI) that drives severe fibrotic remodeling of the lung via coordination of a fibrotic signaling niche containing inflammatory alveolar fibroblasts (iAF) and pulmonary osteoclast-like cells (POLC). Computational analysis suggests that iABI elaborate pro-inflammatory signals which increase matrix deposition by iAF and drive differentiation of interstitial macrophages to a highly fibrotic POLC-like state. Niche mapping demonstrates that iABI, iAF, and POLCs interact within newly formed fibrotic niches in the lung alveolus, driving widespread fibrosis in animals with pre-existing accumulation of ABI. These data support the conclusion that ABIs actively participate in driving fibrosis after silica-induced lung injury, providing direct evidence that ABI accumulation in fibrotic lung disease is likely pathogenic.

Keywords: Pulmonary Fibrosis, Lung Regeneration, Silicosis

Introduction

The two major epithelial cell types present in the alveolar epithelium in all mammals are alveolar epithelial type 1 (AT1) and alveolar epithelial type 2 (AT2) cells. AT1 cells directly localize with capillary endothelial cells to make up the gas exchange surface of the lung, while AT2 cells produce pulmonary surfactant to prevent atelectasis during respiration1. During acute lung injury, the respiratory barrier is compromised; AT2 cell proliferation and subsequent AT2 to AT1 cell trans-differentiation are required to re-epithelialize the alveolus to restore barrier function and gas exchange capacity25. AT2 cell progenitors, also called alveolar epithelial progenitors (AEPs), are mobilized by Wnt and Fgf signaling following lung injury to undergo expansion and differentiation and regenerate the alveolar epithelium69. The process of AT2 to AT1 differentiation is critical to lung regeneration, leading to a recent expansion of literature assessing AT1 differentiation following infectious, toxic, and genetic lung injuries. These studies have characterized an intermediate cell state during AT2 to AT1 cell differentiation which exhibit hallmarks of cell stress, arise following bleomycin lung injury, IL-1b-induced inflammation, AT1-specific ablation via diphtheria toxin, and hyperoxia during influenza A infection1015. While named variously by multiple groups, common to all descriptions of this cell state is elevated expression of Keratin 8 (Krt8), a cytoskeletal marker associated with proximal epithelial cell identity and upregulated in lung adenocarcinoma16,17 that is expressed across all lung epithelia. Krt8 is more highly expressed in these stressed transitional epithelial cells, so we denote them here as Krt8high cells. The heterogeneity of Krt8high cells is unclear, though extensive evidence from human disease has implicated similar cell states in acute and chronic lung diseases1821. Given the robust induction of Krt8high cells following diverse lung injuries and their accumulation in human lung disease, there is a strong rationale to better understand the mechanisms of Krt8high cell induction, triggers for accumulation, and their role in the diseased lung.

Krt8high cells were originally identified and have been extensively evaluated in the context of fibrotic lung injury. Recent data has demonstrated that Krt8high cells upregulate integrin β6 (Itgb6) and contribute to mechanisms of fibrosis via activation of myofibroblasts22 or increased TGFβ expression15,23,24. Krt8high cells as a group encompass an apparently heterogeneous group of transitional cell states with names that include the pre-alveolar type-1 transitional cell state (PATS) and the alveolar-basal intermediate (ABI) 1 and ABI2 cell states25. ABI, particularly ABI2 cells, are enriched in severely fibrotic regions of IPF lungs compared to control lungs and non-fibrotic regions of IPF lung samples1012,2628. Existing studies have characterized the molecular function of Krt8high cells during alveolar stress in the context of murine lung injuries1012. However, these lung injury models injure not only the alveolar epithelium but also existing mesenchymal, endothelial, and immune cells in the lung. Krt8high cell interactions with fibroblasts and immune cell types are likely central to the role of Krt8high cells in lung disease, but are challenging to directly assess during injuries that simultaneously damage all of these compartments in the lung. Additionally, broad immune activation in the context of extensive lung injury makes it difficult to assess whether epithelial dysfunction drives a worsening inflammatory milieu or vice versa. These challenges have limited the current evidence addressing whether Krt8high cell accumulation prior to injury, as in patients with established lung disease, is protective or deleterious as the lung responds to injury and regenerates.

In this work, we directly test the role of accumulated Krt8high cells on the progression of lung fibrosis. Previous research in our laboratory has described a tractable model for studying Krt8high cell accumulation, in which genetic ablation of Nkx2–1 in AEPs promotes irreversible acquisition of a Krt8high state during lung homeostasis13. This model allowed us to generate animals in which Krt8high cells are present prior to lung injury, enabling direct evaluation of the impact of accumulated Krt8high cells during injury and regeneration on the alveolar niche. Here, we show that Nkx2–1KO Krt8high cells accumulate in a state most similar to previously described ABI/ABI1 cell state characterized by a combination of Krt8hi/Krt7hi/Krt19hi expression. To isolate the effect of pre-existing ABI during injury, we chose administration of crystalline silica which causes fibrotic lung injury in both murine models2931 and human patients32,33. Inhalation of silica particulate manifests as progressive massive fibrosis, diffuse interstitial fibrosis, or simple nodular fibrosis in human patients over time34. The pathophysiology of silicosis in human patients is driven primarily by chronic injury to alveolar macrophages, where RANK ligand and inflammatory cytokine activation drive macrophage differentiation towards pulmonary osteoclast-like cells (POLCs) which potentiate fibrosis. This pathophysiology is recapitulated in murine models of silicosis 28–56 days after silica administration35. We show that silica-induced fibrosis in mice occurs without spontaneous induction of Krt8high cells in control animals, allowing direct assessment the impact of accumulated ABI on lung fibrosis. We show that after silica-induced fibrotic lung injury, these Nkx2–1 KO ABI take on a unique inflamed ABI (iABI) state, which, in turn, alters the alveolar microenvironment. iABI drive a fibrotic alveolar milieu which leads to more severe and widespread fibrotic injury. iABI cell activation potentiates a physical and signaling niche containing inflammatory alveolar fibroblasts (iAF), activated alveolar monocytes, and POLCs. Within this fibrotic niche, iABIs engage in crosstalk with both IAFs and osteoclastic macrophage populations to amplify pro-fibrotic and inflammatory signaling. These data directly implicate ABI accumulation and persistence in a fibrotic niche driving lung disease.

Results

Krt8high cell accumulation prior to silicosis increases lung fibrosis severity.

To evaluate the epithelial-driven influence of Krt8high cells in the fibrotic lung milieu, we first generated Krt8high cells in vivo via tamoxifen-induced recombination using the AT2 progenitor-enriched Tfcp2l1CreERT2 driver in combination with Nkx2–1flox/flox, as previously described13. In vivo genetic ablation of Nkx2–1 in AT2 progenitors leads to acquisition of a stressed cell state characterized by high Krt8 expression and loss of SFTPC expression in lineage-labelled cells within 2 weeks of tamoxifen treatment13. To induce fibrotic lung injury, we administered silica particles intratracheally 2-, 4-, or 8 weeks after tamoxifen induction of Krt8high cell and harvested the lungs for downstream analyses 28 days after silica administration [Fig.1A]. Silica treatment in both wild-type (WT) and Nkx2–1 KO mice led to significant weight loss that peaked 2 days post-injury (dpi), with recovery of weight nobale in both groups by 28dpi [Supplementary Fig.1A].

Figure 1. Accumulated Krt8high epithelia lead to increased lung damage, respiratory barrier disruption, and lung fibrosis in experimental silicosis.

Figure 1.

(A) Experimental schematic. (B-E) H&E staining demonstrated that silica-induced lung injury areas are more discrete in silica-treated (TR) WT (B) and comparatively more widespread in TR Nkx2–1 KO (D). Lung damage assessment program showed increased “damaged” lung surface area (green) in TR KO lungs (E) compared to TR WT lungs (C); this is quantified in (G) with exact p values calculated by t-test. (F) The hydroxyproline assay revealed significantly increased collagen deposition in TR animals compared to untreated (UNT) animals, and significantly increased collagen deposition in TR KO compared to TR WT. Exact p-values calculated by one-way ANOVA with multiple comparisons. (H-I) Pentachrome staining of TR WT lungs (H) and TR Nkx2–1 KO lungs (I) confirmed increased collagen and elastin deposition in TR KO lungs compared to TR WT lungs. (J) Albumin concentration in the bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) was significantly upregulated in both TR WT and TR KO animals compared to UNT animals, but no difference was observed in albumin concentration between TR WT vs TR KO animals. (K) IgM concentration in the BALF was significantly upregulated in TR KO compared to TR WT animals, with non-significant differences observed between UNT and TR WT animals. Exact p-values calculated by one-way ANOVA with multiple comparisons.

We observed increased lung damage in Nkx2–1 KO lungs at 28dpi compared to WT anmals exposed to silica. Histological examination by H&E showed widespread fibrotic remodeling more expansive than the typical silicosis nodules found in WT animals [Fig.1BE], which correlated with significantly increased hydroxyproline content in Nkx2–1 KO animals [Fig.1F]. Quantification of lung damage using clustering of image pixels to characterize distinct zones of lung injury as “severe,” “damaged,” and “normal” in an unbiased manner36 showed that Nkx2–1 KO lungs displayed a significantly higher percentages of “damaged” lung surface area compared to silica-treated WT lungs [Fig.1B1E,G]. Percentages of “severe” lung injury between the two groups were not different; severe injury was typically scored in areas of fibrotic nodules [Supplementary Fig.1B]. We visually confirmed increased collagen deposition in Nkx2–1 KO lungs compared to control lungs with pentachrome staining [Fig.1HI], which labels collagen and reticular fibers (yellow), elastic fibers (black), mucin (blue), and fibrin (red). We then evaluated alveolar epithelial barrier disruption in Nkx2–1 KO lungs by quantifying IgM and albumin concentrations in murine bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF)3740. Neither albumin, a large protein at 70kDa37,41, nor IgM, a 900kDa antibody, are present in the alveolar airspace during homeostasis [Fig.1JK] and their presence in the BALF suggests elevated permeability of the respiratory barrier. Albumin concentrations were significantly increased in BALF from both silica-treated WT and Nkx2–1 KO mice compared to untreated mice, indicating that alveolar epithelial barrier integrity is compromised in silica-induced lung injury [Fig.1J]. Interestingly, IgM concentrations were not significantly increased in silica-treated WT BALF compared to untreated animals, but are markedly increased in silica-treated Nkx2–1 KO BALF compared to untreated mice of both genotypes and silica-treated WT animals [Fig.1K]. These data demonstrated that silica injury leads to disruption of the respiratory barrier such that large proteins like albumin are able to pass through; however, silica injury in the presence of Krt8high cells led to further barrier disruption allowing very large antibodies like IgM to leak into the alveolar space. Taken together, these data demonstrated that accumulated Krt8high cells led to worsened fibrosis and impaired barrier function following silica-induced lung injury.

We hypothesized that this increase in lung injury severity with accumulated Krt8high cells was attributable to the differential impact of Krt8high cells in the alveolar niche. We therefore evaluated the localization and cell states in the Nkx2–1 KO Krt8high cell lineage following silicosis. Lineage-labelled Nkx2–1 KO cells were Krt8hi/SFTPClow following silicosis, and we noted large clusters of these cells preferentially located in areas of silica-induced lung injury in Nkx2–1 KO mice [Fig.2A2D] especially in alveolar regions distinct from fibrotic nodules. Assessment of lineage-labelled AEPs in WT animals showed areas of cell shape change and proliferative expansion surrounding areas of most severe fibrosis, but we noted that lineage-labeled cells were Krt8low/SFTPChi, and that few Krt8high cells were present near fibrotic areas. [Fig.2A2D].

Figure 2. Krt8high epithelia preferentially clusters around areas of silica-induced lung injury.

Figure 2.

(A-D) Lineage-labeled GFP+/Krt8high/SPC− epithelial clusters preferentially surround areas of lung injury in TR KO lungs (C), whereas lineage-labeled GFP+/Krt8low/SPC+ AEPs proliferate adjacent to areas of lung injury in TR WT (A). AEPs and Krt8hi epithelial clusters are stochastically present in uninjured areas of TR lungs (B,D). (E-F) Integrin b6 (Itgb6) expression is exclusively upregulated in Krt8high cell clusters that are present in UNT and TR KO lungs. aSMA presence was observed in injured areas of both TR WT (G) and TR KO (H) lungs.

Krt8high cells have been reported to express multiple cell junctional markers, such as E-cadherin, Claudin4 (Cldn4), and integrin β6 (Itgb6), suggesting differential cell-cell interaction potential in the Krt8high population compared to AT2 progenitors10,11,13. Nkx2–1 KO epithelial cell clusters express high levels of E-cadherin and CLDN413, as well as high level of ITGB6 notable prior to silica treatment which persisted throughout the course of silicosis [Fig.2EF]. This expression pattern is consistent with the hypothesis that Nkx2–1 KO lineage cells could alter niche interactions in the fibrotic niche. Itgb6 expression correlates with activation of Tgfβ signaling, and loss of Itgb6 expression is protective against the development of pulmonary fibrosis23. Concordantly, we observed close association of lineage labeled Krt8high cells with alpha-smooth muscle actin (aSMA) expression in injured areas of silica-treated Nkx2–1 KO lungs, indicating activation of myofibroblasts after silica injury [Fig.1G1H]. Interestingly, comparison of silicosis severity at 2, 4, or 8 weeks following tamoxifen showed no significant difference in severity of injury or degree of fibrosis [Supplementary Fig.2AH], suggesting that Krt8high cell presence, rather than length of exposure of the lung to Krt8high cells, was the primary factor conferring increased silicosis severity. Together, these data were consistent with the model that Nkx2–1 KO-lineage Krt8high cells could directly drive fibrotic niche organization in silicosis.

Krt8high cells in the Nkx2–1 KO lineage are alveolar-basal intermediates (ABI).

Multiple reports have suggested substantial heterogeneity among Krt8high cells following lung injury. To characterize the Krt8high cell states observed in our murine Nkx2–1 KO model following silica-induced fibrotic lung injury, we used fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) to isolate lineage-labelled Nkx2–1 null Krt8high cells from Nkx2–1 KO lungs and lineage-labelled AT2 progenitors from WT lungs and conducted single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA seq) to compare the molecular state of these cell populations [Fig.3AB].

Figure 3. Krt8high epithelia are in an alveolar-basal intermediate (ABI) cell state.

Figure 3.

(A) UMAP identifying epithelial cell states from untreated WT and Nkx2–1 KO conditions. (B) Dotplot expression markers for AT1, AT2, ABI, and proliferating ABI (pABI) epithelial states. (C-F) Untreated Nkx2–1 KO clusters are Krt7high/Krt19high/Krt17neg compared to untreated WT AEPs. Flow cytometry shows that alveolar cell fate acquisition is significantly decreased in UNT KO lungs compared to UNT WT (G) and that airway cell fate is correspondingly significantly increased (H).

Integrated analysis of FACS-sorted lineage-labeled epithelial cells from untreated WT and Nkx2–1 KO mice identified 4 distinct epithelial cell states through Seurat graph-based clustering [Fig.3A]. As expected, FACS-sorted AEPs in WT animals were predominantly AT2 cells defined by canonical expression of AT2-associated genes (i.e., Abca3, Lamp3, and Sftpc) [Fig.3AB], with a small AT1 cell state defined by canonical expression of AT1-associated genes (i.e., Hopx and Rtkn2). The Nkx2–1 KO lineage contained a small proportion of AT2 cells and no detectable AT1s. The lineage was otherwise comprised of Krt8high cells, which were present exclusively in Nkx2–1 KO animals. These cells showed minimal Sftpc expression and significantly increased expression of Krt7, Krt8, and Krt19 [Fig.3AB]. These findings were confirmed via immunofluorescence (IF), which showed expression KRT7, KRT8, and KRT19, and lack of KRT17 expression [Fig.3D3G] in NkxKO lineage epithelial cells. Flow cytometry for alveolar (Epcamhi/CD31low/YFP+/Itgb4low/CD24low) and airway (Itgb4high/CD24high) cell states [Supplementary Fig.3] demonstrated that many cells in the Nkx2–1 KO lineage had adopted airway-like cell surface marker expression [Fig.3HI]. However, Nkx2–1 null cells were rarely observed to differentiate into ciliated cells, secretory cells, or basal cells in vivo [Supplementary Figure 4AI]. Taken together, these data demonstrate the Nkx2–1 KO lineage Krt8high cells are in a molecular state most consistent with previously described alveolar-basal intermediate cells (ABI).

Nkx2–1 KO ABI cells undergo inflammatory activation in the silica-induced fibrotic lung milieu.

We next evaluated the evolution of the AT2 lineage in both WT and Nkx2–1 KO animals following silica-induced lung injury. Integrated analysis of FACS-sorted AEPs or ABIs from untreated WT and untreated Nkx2–1 KO, as well as silica-treated WT and silica-treated Nkx2–1 KO mice, identified 5 distinct epithelial cell states through Seurat graph-based clustering [Fig.4A]. We noted a newly identified cell state which arose exclusively in the silica-treated Nkx2–1 KO condition [Fig.4A4B, 4E]. This cell state showed high expression of inflammatory response genes, suggesting an activated inflammatory state; we denoted this state as inflamed ABI (iABI). We hypothesized that the iABI state was arising secondary to lung injury.

Figure 4. An inflamed ABI (iABI) cell state emerges after silica treatment.

Figure 4.

(A) UMAP of integrated 3v4 scRNA sequencing analysis of FACS-sorted lineage-labeled epithelial cells from untreated (UNT) WT, UNT Nkx2–1 KO, silica-treated (TR) WT, and TR Nkx2–1 KO conditions displaying 5 distinct epithelial cell states. (B) Frequency of epithelial cell state in each condition; inflamed ABIs (iABI) are exclusively present in TR Nkx2–1 KO condition. (C) UMAP of epithelial subset of whole lung scRNA sequencing via 10X Flex Genomics from all conditions identifies 6 distinct epithelial cell states. (D) iABIs and ABIs are exclusively present in KO epithelial subsets. (E) UMAPs of integrated scRNA sequencing analysis of FACS-sorted lineage-labeled epithelial cells and epithelial subset of whole lung scRNA sequencing separated by condition, showing that ABIs are only present in Nkx2–1 KO conditions and iABIs are only present in silica-treated Nkx2–1 KO condition in both data sets. (F) NicheNet analysis of whole lung scRNA sequencing reveals ligands sent by alveolar fibroblasts (AF), inflammatory AF (iAF), pulmonary osteoclast-like cells (POLC), and classical monocytes act on ABI-enriched receptors (red, K) to drive expression of iABI markers of inflammation (green, K). (G-J) OAS2 and IFIT3 expression is observed in GFP+ ABIs in TR KO condition in injured areas (arrows) consistent with iABI state; iABIs are not observed in uninjured areas of TR WT and TR KO. (K) Enriched receptors and gene expression markers of ABIs and iABIs in comparison to other identified epithelial cell states.

To further evaluate the driving signals leading to iABI cell state acquisition and the cellular interactions of iABIs within the fibrotic alveolar niche, we conducted whole lung single-cell RNA sequencing with 10X Genomics Chromium Single Cell Gene Expression Flex on all experimental conditions [Supplementary Fig. 5]. Integrated analysis of the epithelial cell subset identified all the distinct epithelial cell states present from FACS-sorted scRNA-sequencing, as well as additional ciliated and secretory airway epithelial cell states [Fig. 4C4E]. Combined analysis of FACS-sorted YFP+ cells with 3v4 RNA sequencing and whole lung FLEX data confirmed that ABI were present exclusively in Nkx2–1 KO conditions and that iABI were present exclusively in the silica-treated Nkx2–1 KO condition [Fig.4E]. To define upstream signals driving iABI acquisition, we next evaluated ligand-receptor interactions between ABIs and other cell states in the alveolar niche using a combination of CellChat42,43 and NicheNet44. ABI receive signals from multiple cell types within the fibrotic niche (i.e., Fbn and Mdk from alveolar fibroblasts, App and Spp1 from POLCs) that activate ABI-enriched receptors (Itgb6, Lrp1), and these ligand-receptor interactions drive expression of iABI markers enriched in inflammation [Fig.4F]. These inflamed ABIs retained canonical ABI markers including Krt7/Krt19 and were defined by expression of inflammatory markers, such as Oas2, Ifit3, Irf7, Ifi44, and Isg15 Lgals3, a key marker of Krt8high cells following bleomycin injury, was also highly upregulated in iABI [Fig.4K]. We identified ABI cells within fibrotic lung regions by IF for the iABI enriched targets OAS2 and IFIT3, and identified multiple iABI in GFP+ lineage-labelled Nkx2–1 KO cells [Fig.4G4J]. ABI and iABIs are notably absent from the silica-treated niche in control animals [Fig.4G4J], supporting the conclusion that signaling driven by iABI cells may underlie the severe fibrosis seen in Nkx2–1 KO animals.

iABI cells drive inflammatory alveolar fibroblast (iAF) activation during silicosis.

We next sought to evaluate the consequences of iABI presence in fibrotic niches in the Nkx2–1 KO lung. iABIs specifically expressed a number of pro-fibrotic and pro-inflammatory ligands [Fig.4F,K], including Rankl, Ccn1, Spp1, Mmp7, and Cxcl5. We therefore reasoned that these signals may participate in sculpting the milieu of the lung during silicosis-induced fibrosis. We first evaluated the mesenchymal compartment, were recent data has demonstrated that alveolar fibroblasts can differentiate towards an inflammatory (iAF) fibroblast state marked by expression of LCN2 and SAA3 followed by a fibrotic fibroblast (fAF) state marked by expression of CTHRC145. Consistent with prior reports in silicosis45, we identified very few Cthrc1-expressing fAF cells by scRNAseq. Integrated analysis of the mesenchymal subset of whole lung scRNA sequencing data from all experimental conditions instead identified seven distinct mesenchymal cell states [Fig.5A], with a prominent component of inflammatory alveolar fibroblasts. These iAF were defined by expression of Meox2, Saa3, Lcn2, and Ccl2, and emerged in both WT and Nkx2–1 KO lungs after silica treatment [Fig.5B5C]. iAF frequency was higher in silica-treated Nkx2–1 KO lungs compared to silica-treated WT lungs [Fig.5B], suggesting that their emergence may be influenced by the presence of ABI/iABI. We identified iAF in both WT and Nkx2–1 KO lungs after silica-induced lung injury by IF. iAF co-expressed SAA3, LCN2, and MEOX2 [Fig.5D5G], and were enriched in regions of most severe fibrosis in animals from both genotypes. Gene expression of Lcn2 in iAFs was highest in iAFs from silica-treated Nkx2–1 KO mice [Fig.5H]. We then evaluated ligand-receptor interactions that drive iAF emergence and function in the fibrotic niche. We found that signaling ligands expressed on ABIs, iABIs, and myeloid lineages including POLCs were predicted to interact with iAF-enriched receptors. These interactions drove activation of an iAF-enriched gene signature which included a pro-fibrotic program driven by Osteopontin/Spp1 and an inflammatory response program driven by TNF and IL1 signaling. Togther, these inputs drove expression of key iAF target genes that contribute to ECM deposition and immune cell recruitment [Fig.5I]. iABI-enriched ligands, which included Spp1, Ccn1, and Mmp7 were predicted to contribute to ECM deposition downstream of iAF, consistent with a known role of these pathways in pulmonary fibrosis in both humans4650. Many of the ligands expressed by iAF were predicted to signal to pulmonary macrophages, so we next turned our attention to the macrophage and monocyte compartment of the iABI/iAF niche.

Figure 5. Inflammatory alveolar fibroblasts (iAF) emerge after silica-induced lung injury.

Figure 5.

(A) UMAP of mesenchymal subset from whole lung sequencing data, showing identification of 7 distinct mesenchymal cell states. (B) Mesenchymal cell frequencies demonstrating increased emergence of iAF1 in TR Nkx2–1 KO lungs compared to TR WT lungs. (C) Dotplot shows gene expression markers for each mesenchymal cell state with clear upregulation of inflammatory markers in iAFs. (D-G) Immunohistochemistry confirms iAF presence (arrows) with co-expression of SAA3, LCN2, and MEOX2 exclusively in injured areas of TR WT and TR KO lungs. (H) Violin plot of Lcn2 expression of iAFs in UNT WT, UNT KO, TR WT, and TR KO shows highest expression of Lcn2 in TR KO condition. (I) NicheNet analysis demonstrates that ligands sent from ABI, iABI, and POLCs (J) act directly on iAF-enriched receptors (K) to drive expression of genes involved in iAF identity, extracellular matrix (ECM) deposition, and immune cell recruitment (L).

ABI drive differentiation of pro-fibrotic POLC from interstitial macrophages to potentiate pulmonary fibrosis.

Macrophages play a prominent role in the regulation of lung fibrosis, as monocyte-derived alveolar macrophages are recruited to regions of alveolar injury and have been demonstrated to contribute to fibrotic tissue remodeling5153. In silicosis, both alveolar macrophages and interstitial macrophages are known to transition to an osteoclast-like (POLC) state driven by RANKL/RANK signaling which contribute to development of fibrosis following silica exposure in both mice and humans. The pathogenic role of POLCs is further supported by the finding that reducing POLC differentiation via blockade of RANKL improves fibrosis following silica exposure35. Integrated analysis of immune cell populations from our whole lung sequencing data revealed increased numbers of alveolar macrophages (AM), interstitial macrophages (IM), and POLCs [Fig.6A6B]. Concordant with previous data35, multiple macrophage subsets demonstrated upregulation of a POLC-like gene program, with two populations clearly identifiable as POLCs [Fig.6C]. One of these populations, denoted POLCs, was present in both WT and Nkx2–1 KO mice following silicosis, while a second, denoted KO POLC, was present almost exclusively in Nkx2–1 KO.

Figure 6. ABI drive differentiation of interstitial macrophages toward pro-fibrotic pulmonary osteoclast-like cells (POLCs) to potentiate fibrosis following silica.

Figure 6.

(A) UMAP detailing macrophage/monocyte cell populations from integrated analysis of whole lung scRNA sequencing concatenated across all experimental conditions. (B) Cell population frequencies show upregulated alveolar macrophage (AM), interstitial macrophage (IM), POLC, and KO-specific POLC frequencies TR Nkx2–1 KO condition. (C) Dotplot of osteoclast-like gene expression markers show upregulated expression of osteoclast-like genes in silica-associated AMs, IMs, and POLCs, with further upregulated expression in conditional KO-specific POLCs. (D-G) Flow cytometry delineates upregulated AM frequencies as tissue-resident as opposed to monocyte-derived; tissue-resident interstitial macrophages (IM) are significantly increased in TR KO compared with TR WT lungs. (H-I) Pseudotime analysis shows that POLCs and KO POLCs predominantly emerge from IM, which are upregulated in the TR KO condition. (J-K) Fate probability maps show POLCs arise from both IM and AM, while KO POLCs are likely derived from IMs. (L-O) immunohistochemistry demonstrating that TRAP+/CTSK+ POLCs and KO POLCs are enriched throughout injured areas of TR lungs. KO POLCs exhibit higher expression of TRAP and with POLC-like morphology (N-O). (P) Gene Ontology (GO) terms enriched in KO POLCs compared to other POLCs from all conditions demonstrate enrichment of genes involved in pro-fibrotic processes like ECM remodeling, inflammation, and osteoclast differentiation.

We confirmed changes in multiple macrophage subsets using spectral flow cytometry54 following silica-induced lung injury [Fig. 6DG]. Most notably, we identified significant increases in tissue-resident interstitial macrophages (IM) in both silica-treated WT and silica-treated Nkx2–1 KO conditions compared to untreated conditions [Fig. 6D]. We also observed increased AM frequencies in both untreated and silica-treated Nkx2–1 KO lungs [Fig.6EG]; these AMs were largely CD64hi/CD11blow tissue-resident AMs rather than monocyte-derived AMs [Fig.6E6G, Supplementary Figure 6].

To evaluate the origin of the POLC and KO POLC cell states, we performed trajectory analysis with Slingshot55 [Fig.6HI] and condition-specific trajectory topology evaluation [Fig.6JK] with Condiments56. As expected, both AM and IM populations were predicted as possible cells of origin for POLCs in both WT and Nkx2–1 KO mice following silica administration [Fig.6JK]. Conversely, KO POLCs were predicted to arise almost entirely from IM rather than AM [Fig.6JK], consistent with the increased recruitment of IM seen by flow cytometry. We therefore predicted that the ABI/iABI niche would be enriched for POLCs. To that end, we performed Tartrate-Resistant Acid Phosphatase (TRAP) and cathepsin K (CTSK) staining to localize POLCs throughout the lung. We confirmed presence of POLCs in fibrotic nodules in both WT and Nkx2–1 KO mice. We also noted large numbers of POLCs in areas of distant fibrotic remodeling throughout the Nkx2–1 KO lung, while few POLCs were present in the WT lung outside of fibrotic nodules [Fig.6LO]. Notably, comparison of gene expression in KO POLC compared to POLC showed significant enrichment of genes associated with fibrosis, hypoxemia, and inflammatory signaling, further suggesting that KO POLCs in the Nkx2–1 KO niche were potentiating fibrosis.

A feed forward, pro-fibrotic loop coordinated by ABIs following silicosis.

In support of this conclusion, combined CellChat and NicheNet analysis suggested that POLCs, KO POLCs, iABIs, and iAFs were among the most strongly enriched signaling centers in the overall signaling milieu of the Nkx2–1 KO lung following silicosis [Fig.7A]. Multiple pro-fibrotic pathways were notably enriched in this milieu, including RANKL, Osteopontin/SPP1, TNF, and TGFβ [Fig.7B]. POLCs were poised to respond to many of these pro-fibrotic signals [Fig.7C], with prominent inputs from iABI and iAF implicated in activation the pro-fibrotic and pro-inflammatory programs which defined the KO POLCs state. These silica-specific, ABI-driven KO POLCs also produced multiple ligands (Spp1, App, Rankl, Csf1) that fed back to iABI and iAF to stimulate a pro-inflammatory and pro-fibrotic milieu [Fig.7C].

Figure 7. iABIs, iAFs, and POLCs enhance pro-fibrotic and pro-inflammatory signaling pathways in the alveolar niche.

Figure 7.

(A) POLCs, KO POLCs, and iABIs are key players in the alveolar signaling niche of silica-treated (TR) Nkx2–1 KO (SKO) animals as they have the strongest incoming and outgoing signals compared with silica-treated (TR) WT (SWT) animals. (B) Multiple pro-fibrotic, pro-inflammatory, osteoclast-driving signaling pathways are enhanced in the SKO condition, including RANKL, SPP1, and TGFb. (C) NicheNet analysis of the major ligand-receptor interactions between key players in the SKO niche (ABI, iABI, iAF, POLC, KO POLC) demonstrate that they signal reciprocally and engage in a pro-fibrotic loop that drives iABI and iAF emergence, as well as immune cell recruitment. (D-G) Immunohistochemistry shows SIGLECF+/CD45+ AMs are present in both injured and uninjured areas of TR lungs.

These signaling interactions provided the third piece of evidence supporting an iABI, iAF, and POLC niche driving fibrosis in Nkx2–1 KO mice. However, for these signaling interactions to be relevant, the predicted cellular partners need to localize in a common region in the lung. iABI and iAF co-localized in fibrotic regions [Fig.4IJ, Fig 5FG], and lineaged labeld ABI/iABI and SiglecF+/CD45+ cells were found in close association specifically in regions of fibrotic injury in Nkx2–1 KO lungs [Fig.7DG]. Taken together, these data demonstrate a physical and signaling niche driven by ABI cells which respond to inflammatory signals and activate pro-inflammatory and pro-fibrotic programs after lung injury [Fig.8]. Since ABI are nearly absent from the WT lung after silica treatment, these data strongly support the conclusion that pre-existing, accumulated ABI are able to participate in the lung injury response, potentiate tissue damage, and are therefore deleterious during lung injury and may impair tissue regeneration.

Figure 8. Accumulated ABI are activated by inflammation to drive lung fibrosis following silica exposure.

Figure 8.

In the WT niche, few ABI participate in a siganling loop between iAF and POLC cells which drives fibrotic nodule formation. In the Nkx2–1 niche, where ABI have accumulated, a fibrotic lung injury stimulus like silica drives the emergence of inflammatory cell populations (iABI, iAF) that activate reciprocal ligand-receptor signaling interactions signaling between iABIs, iAFs, POLCs, and KO POLCS activates major pro-fibrotic and pro-inflammatory signaling pathways in the alveolar niche.

Discussion

The pathogenicity versus protective nature of “transitional” cells has been a key unanswered and ontroversial question raised by extensive recent lung biology and regeneration literature. Here, we show that ABI cell accumulation in the lung is deletirious and drives a fibrotic lung injury milieu following induction of secondary injury, with increased lung damage, increased respiratory barrier permeability, and worsened fibrosis. Our model of Nkx2–1 deletion in AT2 progenitors allowed direct attribution of these effects to precisely timed accumulation of ABIs. While Nkx2–1 loss of function is an artificial method of ABI induction, reduction in Nkx2–1 expression and function is a common aspect of the transition of AT2 progenitors to Krt8high cells in multiple models10,13,27,57, and our data demonstrates clearly that Nkx2–1 null Krt8high cells share a common molecular state with other reported ABI25,58, do not demonstrate differentiation to other endoderm lineages13, and do not transition more proximal lineages following injury. Instead, following secondary injury, these ABIs take on a uniquely inflamed state and directly interact with inflammatory alveolar fibroblasts and silica-specific macrophages to drive excessive accumulation of collagen and extracellular matrix proteins via stimulation of Tgfb, Spp1, Collagen, and Laminin pathways [Fig.7,8].

These data position ABI accumulation as a key component of the pathogenesis of lung fibrosis22, and suggest that ABI represent a therapeutic target for future therapies for fibrotic lung disease. Our data imply that removal or rescue of ABI would prevent iABI fate transition, thus decreasing number and actvation of inflammatory alveolar fibroblasts, POLCs, and other pro-fibrotic cell states. The cellular crosstalk between these major inflammatory cell populations is critical to model of how ABIs promote fibrotic lung remodeling, driving increased collagen and extracellular matrix deposition in the presence of ABI. Strongly supportive of this model is the recent report that ablation of Krt8high/Sprr1a+ ABI attenuates lung fibrosis in bleomycin-induced lung injury59. These data demonstrated that Sprr1a expression is relatively exclusive to Krt8high cells compared to other cell types found in the lung during bleomycin injury, allowing specific ablation of these cells. However, not all Krt8high cells express Sprr1a, and ablation with the diphtheria toxin/diphtheria-toxin receptor (DT/DTR) system effectively targeted only 40% of Sppr1a+ cells59. While the results of this study combine with present data to support the conclusion that ABI are pathologic during lung fibrosis, they are also limited by the use of single-dose bleomycin injury, which is known to cause spontaneously resolving lung fibrosis.

One key limitation of our model is the inability to clearly separate ABI accumulation from loss of AT2 progenitor function in the lung following secondary injury. We specifically chose silica-induced fibrosis rather than bleomycin or other lung injury models to mitigate this limitation, as silica induces fibrosis primarily via activation of macrophage signaling, is associated with limited epithelial injury30,31,35, and our data demonstrate very little accumulation of Krt8high cells in WT animals treated with silica. These aspects improve the dynamic range between our tested conditions, with WT animals having minimal ABI accumulation and Nkx2–1 KO mice exhibiting extensive and widespread accumulation. While beneficial for addressing the specific question of whether ABI accumulation is deleterious, this limitation tempers the translational value of the current model. One potential next step would be to identify key molecular partners of Nkx2–1 that drive ABI accumulation, allowing potential targeting of epigenetic or signaling pathways which could represent more tractable therapeutic targets than core transcriptional regulators. Our data does, however, emphasize the value of specific defiinition of cell states within the heterogeneous Krt8high cell population, and suggest that future studies focused on a combination of inducible ABI gain and rescue would be required to enable the fine grained molecular phenotyping of ABI cell function that will likely be needed to move toward directed therapies to rescue ABI in patients with established ABI accumulation and fibrotic lung disease.

It is tempting to speculate that ABI may also participate actively in the tissue response to other lung injuries, including viral pneumonia (SARS-COV2, influenza) and ARDS. Fibrotic responses can be beneficial in the setting of acute injury, helping to restore local tissue integrity and prevent progression of disease beyond the boundaries of the impacted region of the lung. The pro-fibrotic role of ABI may therefore be context dependent, beneficial in some injury/repair situations, and deleterious in others. While present data emphasize that ABI can be pathogenic, in the future clear definition of the contexts in which ABI-induced fibrotic signaling is beneficial vs pathogenic will be required to identify patients who could most benefit from targeting of ABI for therapy in lung disease.

Materials and Methods

Many of the following described methods correspond with previously published work in our laboratory13,50.

Ethical compliance and animals:

All animal studies were conducted following the guidelines of the Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center (CCHMC) Institutional Animal care and Use Committee (IACUC). Proposed studies were evaluated by the IACUC prior to performance. All studies were performed following CCHMC regulatory and biosafety protocols. The following mouse lines were used: Tfcp2l1CreERT2 (B6;129S-Tfcp2l1tm1.1(cre/ERT2)Ovi/J; Jackson Strain #028732), Nkx2–1fl/fl (a gift from Shioko Kimura), and R26REYFP (B6.129×1-Gt(ROSA)26Sortm1(EYFP)Cos/J; Jackson Strain #006148). For tamoxifen-induced Cre recombination, in mouse models, 6–8-week-old mice were given intraperitoneal (IP) injections of Tamoxifen (Sigma, T5648; dissolved in ethanol and resuspended in corn oil) at a dose of 50 mg/kg, twice every other day at the experimental time points previously mentioned.

In vivo silica exposure:

Silica particles (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, catalog number S5631; particle size: 80% between 1 and 5μm, 99% between 0.5 and 10μm) were boiled in 1 N HCl for 1 hour, washed with deionized H2O, and dried at 100°C. The particles were then heat sterilized at 200°C for 2 hours and suspended in sterile saline, as previously described34. The endotoxin content of the silica particles was silica (<1.0 pg/μg) as determined using the LAL Chromogenic Endotoxin Quantitation Kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Rockford, IL) according to the manufacturer’s instructions34. Prior to administration, 100mg of silica particles were resuspended in 1mL of 0.9% sodium chloride (saline) and subsequently vortexed and sonicated. During oropharyngeal (o.a.) silica administration, each mouse was first anesthetized with IP Ketamine/Xylazine solution (comprised of 9mg/mL Ketamine and 0.9mg/mL Xylazine) at a dose of 0.01mL/g and suspended by string on a procedure board at an approximately 60°C angle by the incisor teeth. The mouth was opened, the tongue was pulled forward, and 5mg of resuspended silica in saline was placed at the base of the tongue. The tongue was released after aspiration of the silica34.

Mouse lung harvest:

Mice were anesthetized via IP Ketamine/Xylazine solution, followed by euthanasia via cervical dislocation and thoracotomy. The chest cavity was opened to expose the heart and lungs. The right ventricle was perfused with 10mL of cold PBS to clear blood from the lungs. For flow cytometry, the right lobes were tied off, cut, and placed in PBS for downstream processing. For tissue fixation for histology and immunofluorescence, the trachea was cannulated, and lungs (or only the left lobe) were inflated via syringe using 2% paraformaldehyde (PFA). Inflated lung lobe(s) were immersed in either a conical or small glass jar of 2% PFA and left on a rocker at 4°C overnight13,50. For bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) collection, the trachea was cannulated, and the lungs were inflated with 1mL of BAL buffer (sterile, vacuum-filtered solution of DPBS, 2nM EDTA, and 0.5% of Fetal Bovine Serum51). The buffer was subsequently aspirated into a syringe, and this flushing procedure was repeated twice for a total of 2mL BALF collection per mouse.

Processing fixed lung tissue for histology and immunofluorescence:

Following inflation, lungs were trimmed of connective tissue and heart and place into histological cassettes. Tissue in cassettes were then washed 3X in DEPC-treated PBS, 1X in DEPC-treated 30% ethanol, 1X in DEPC-treated 50% ethanol, and 1X in DEPC-treated 70% ethanol. Using the standard CCHMC Pulmonary Biology automated processing protocol (Thermo Scientific, Excelsior ES), the samples were embedded in paraffin. Samples were sectioned at a thickness of 5μm with sections examined from the anterior to poster of lungs to ensure complete analysis of all regions of lung parenchyma. Paraffin sections were incubated at 65 °C for 2 h, deparaffinized in xylene (3x for 10 min), rehydrated through an ethanol gradient, and examined following standard H&E staining. Slides were mounted with Permount Mounting Medium (Electron Microscopy Sciences, 17986–05) and cover-slipped with #1.5 Gold Seal 3419 Cover Glass (Electron Microscopy Sciences, 63790–01). For pentachrome staining, Movat Pentachrome Stain Kit (Abcam, ab245884) was used according to manufacturer’s instructions. Immunofluorescence on paraffin sections was performed as previously described9,13. Slides underwent deparaffinization, were rehydrated, and sodium citrate antigen retrieval was performed to prepare for staining (10 mM, pH 6.0), and blocking. Immunofluorescence was performed on paraffin sections using antibodies in Supplementary Table 2 and the following reagents: ImmPRESS® HRP Horse Anti-Rabbit IgG Polymer Detection Kit (Vector Labs, MP-7401–50) or ImmPRESS® HRP Goat Anti-Rat IgG Polymer Detection Kit (Vector Labs, MP-7404–50). Following the application of TSA fluorophores (listed in Supplementary Table 2; 1:100), sections were stained with DAPI (Invitrogen, D1306; 1:1000) and mounted using Prolong Gold antifade mounting medium (Invitrogen, P36930).

Alveolar epithelial permeability tests:

Bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) was diluted 1:250,000, and albumin concentrations were measured across 2 technical replicates with the Mouse Albumin ELISA Kit (Fortis Life Sciences, E99–134). BALF was diluted 1:10, and IgM concentrations were measured across 2 technical replicates with the Mouse IgM ELISA Kit (Fortis Life Sciences, E99–101). For both assays, absorbance measurements were read at 450nm, and concentrations were calculated accordingly from a standard curve.

Hydroxyproline measurements of the murine lung:

The right accessory lobe was flash frozen during mouse lung harvest and thawed prior to assay use for 15min on ice. Samples were homogenized in 100uL molecular-grade H2O and subsequently mixed with 100uL 12 M HCl. Samples were hydrolyzed at 120°C for 3 hours and centrifuged at 10,000g for 3 min. Hydroxyproline content was measured across 2 technical replicates per sample from the supernatant using the Hydroxyproline Assay Kit (Sigma- Aldrich, MAK-569–1KT) according to the manufacturer’s instructions.

Lung damage assessment:

Tile scans of H&E-stained left lobes were processed in ImageJ to ensure all JPEG images were of the same size and scale. Processed images were then run through an RStudio program as previously described, and “normal,” “damaged,” and “severe” surface area percentages were distinguished by pixel density determinations of the program35.

Mouse lung digestion and single-cell suspension:

Single cell suspensions from murine lungs were generated as previously described13. After euthanasia via IP Ketamine/Xylazine, the thorax was exposed, and the right ventricle of the heart was perfused with 10 mL of cold 1X PBS. All lung lobes were cut and submerged in ice-cold PBS. Lung tissue was minced and transferred to a gentleMACS C Tube (Miltenyi 130–096-334) before 5 mL of 37°C digest buffer mixture (dispase (Corning 354235), DNase1 (GoldBio D-301), collagenase type 1 (Gibco 17100017), and 1X PBS) was added. C tubes were placed on a gentleMACS Octo Dissociator  (Miltenyi Biotec, 130–096-427) and the protocols were run: “m_lung_01_02” (36 s) X2, “37C_m_LIDK_1” (36 min 12 s) X1, and “m_lung_01_02” (36 s) X1. All samples were then passed through a 70uM filter and centrifuged at 800g for 8 minutes at 4°C. The supernatant was aspirated, and remaining cells were incubated in room temperature RBC Lysis Buffer (eBioScience 00–4333-57) for 5 minutes. Samples were centrifuged at 500g for 5 minutes at 4°C, the supernatant was aspirated, and the cell pellet was resuspended in cold MACS Buffer [AutoMACS Rinsing Buffer (Miltenyi 130–091-222) + MACS BSA Stock Solution (Miltenyi 130–091-376)] before being passed through a 40uM filter and washed with 5 mL of MACS Buffer. Samples were centrifuged at 500g for 5 minutes at 4°C and resuspended in a final volume of 5 mL of MACS buffer to generate a single cell suspension. 

Fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) preparation and processing:

Cells were incubated in Fc Receptor Binding Inhibitor Polyclonal Antibody (eBioScience 14–9161-73) diluted 1:100 in MACS Buffer for 10 minutes at room temperature. After incubation, samples were centrifuged, supernatant was removed, and cells were incubated in CD326 APC antibody (Invitrogen 17–5791-82) diluted 1:100 in MACS Buffer at room temperature for 10 minutes in the dark. After another round of centrifuging and aspirating, cells were washed with 5 mL of cold MACS Buffer, then centrifuged again. The supernatant was removed, and cells were incubated with Fixable Viability Dye eFluor 780 (eBioScience 65–0865-14) diluted 1:1000 in MACS Buffer for 15 minutes at room temperature in the dark. Cells were then centrifuged and washed 2–3X with 5 mL of cold MACS Buffer before being resuspended in a cell count adjusted volume of MACS Buffer and strained through 35uM filter lids of polystyrene FACS tubes on ice (Corning 352235) for sorting. 

Using single-stain compensation beads (Invitrogen 01111142), gating was adjusted to remove debris and doublets using a BD FACSAria Fusion or BD FACSymphony cell sorter fitted with a 100uM nozzle. Live/CD326+/eYFP+ (AEP) cells were sorted into a 1.5 mL tube pre-coated in 500μL of cold SAGM (Lonza CC-3118) media to preserve cell viability. This protocol yields approximately 2×105 AT2 cells per mouse. 

Spectral flow cytometric analysis:

Lungs were digested, and single-cell suspensions were generated as described. Cells were incubated in Mouse BD Fc Block (BD Pharmingen, 553141) at 1:100 for 10min at room temperature (RT). Cells were then washed with MACS buffer, centrifuged, and resuspended in antibody panel listed in Supplementary Table 2. Cells were washed, centrifuged, and strained through 35uM filter lids of polystyrene FACS tubes. Samples were then run on a 5-laser Cytek Aurora with unstained and single-color controls for spectral unmixing and compensation. Unmixing was done using Cytek’s SpectroFlo software; compensation was adjusted, and gating and analysis was performed using FlowJo.

Sequencing/library preparation:

From each single-cell suspension described above, a maximum of 16,000 cells were loaded into a channel of a 10x Genomics Chromium system by the Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center Single Cell Sequencing Core. Libraries for RNA (v3) and 10x Chromium Single Cell Gene Expression Flex were generated following the manufacturer’s protocol. Sequencing was performed by the Cincinnati Children’s Hospital DNA Sequencing Core using Illumina reagents. Raw Sequencing data was aligned to the mouse reference genome mm10 with CellRanger 3.0.2 to generate expression count matrix files. To detect YFP expressing cells following Cre-mediated activation, a YFP contig was added to the mm10 genome following 10x Genomics “Build a Custom Reference” instructions with modifications. Briefly, a custom EYFP.fasta file was generated using the ‘EYFP’ segment (682–1389) of the pEYFP-N1 plasmid sequence available through Addgene. This sequence was integrated into the standard mm10 assembly available from Ensembl to create a reference compatible for alignment with the CellRanger pipeline described above13.

scRNA seq analysis and visualization:

For scRNA-seq analysis, the output data from CellRanger was partitioned by Velocyto into spliced and unspliced reads. Spliced transcripts were used as the expression input in Seurat. We excluded cells with <2000 or >8000 features, and cells were clustered via the standard Seurat workflow. DoubletFinder was used to identify and remove putative doublets. We integrated the libraries from individual time points and treatments in Seurat, then reclustered, generated a UMAP project, and identified samples based on expression similarity13.

Flex analysis and visualization:

After Harmony normalization and initial clustering with Seurat v552, preliminary cluster identifications were made based on marker gene expression. Based on these preliminary identifications, cells were assigned to one of 5 major groups: epithelium, endothelium, mesenchyme, monocytes, leukocytes, and neutrophils/basophils, to allow for better resolution. Cells in these groups were re-clustered and assigned final identities based on marker gene expression and treatment condition of the clusters. Marker genes for novel clusters, and enriched (fold-change >2, p<0.005) or depleted genes between clusters of interest were identified using Seurat. Using these enriched or depleted genes, Metascape analysis53 was used to identify GO terms, potentially relevant protein-protein interactions, and transcription factors with enriched motifs upstream of changed genes. CellChat47,48 and NicheNet41 were used to identify interactions between all clusters and inflammatory clusters of interest, respectively.

Supplementary Material

Supplement 1

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the Single Cell Genomics Facility (especially Kelly Rangel and Shawn Smith), Bio-Imaging and Analysis Facility (especially director Matt Kofron), Genomics Sequencing Facility, and the Research Flow Cytometry Facility of the Cincinnati Children’s Research Foundation, all of whom have provided extensive technical support.

Funding

HWN, BZ, and AT were supported by NIH/NHLBI 2T32HL007752. FXM was supported by NIH/NHBLI R01HL162261 WJZ was supported by NIH/NHLBI HL156860 and HL164414.

Footnotes

Competing interests: The Authors declare that they have no competing interests for the current work, including patents, financial holdings, advisory positions, or other interests.

Bibliography

  • 1.Dobbs L. G., Johnson M. D., Vanderbilt J., Allen L. & Gonzalez R. The great big alveolar TI cell: evolving concepts and paradigms. Cell Physiol Biochem 25, 55–62 (2010). 10.1159/000272063 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Barkauskas C. E. et al. Type 2 alveolar cells are stem cells in adult lung. J Clin Invest 123, 3025–3036 (2013). 10.1172/JCI68782 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Desai T. J., Brownfield D. G. & Krasnow M. A. Alveolar progenitor and stem cells in lung development, renewal and cancer. Nature 507, 190–194 (2014). 10.1038/nature12930 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Chapman H. A. et al. Integrin alpha6beta4 identifies an adult distal lung epithelial population with regenerative potential in mice. J Clin Invest 121, 2855–2862 (2011). 10.1172/JCI57673 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Xi Y. et al. Local lung hypoxia determines epithelial fate decisions during alveolar regeneration. Nat Cell Biol 19, 904–914 (2017). 10.1038/ncb3580 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Nabhan A. N., Brownfield D. G., Harbury P. B., Krasnow M. A. & Desai T. J. Single-cell Wnt signaling niches maintain stemness of alveolar type 2 cells. Science 359, 1118–1123 (2018). 10.1126/science.aam6603 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Frank D. B. et al. Emergence of a Wave of Wnt Signaling that Regulates Lung Alveologenesis by Controlling Epithelial Self-Renewal and Differentiation. Cell Rep 17, 2312–2325 (2016). 10.1016/j.celrep.2016.11.001 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Basil M. C. et al. The Cellular and Physiological Basis for Lung Repair and Regeneration: Past, Present, and Future. Cell Stem Cell 26, 482–502 (2020). 10.1016/j.stem.2020.03.009 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Zacharias W. J. et al. Regeneration of the lung alveolus by an evolutionarily conserved epithelial progenitor. Nature 555, 251–255 (2018). 10.1038/nature25786 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Strunz M. et al. Alveolar regeneration through a Krt8+ transitional stem cell state that persists in human lung fibrosis. Nat Commun 11, 3559 (2020). 10.1038/s41467-020-17358-3 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Choi J. et al. Inflammatory Signals Induce AT2 Cell-Derived Damage-Associated Transient Progenitors that Mediate Alveolar Regeneration. Cell Stem Cell 27, 366–382 e367 (2020). 10.1016/j.stem.2020.06.020 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Kobayashi Y. et al. Persistence of a regeneration-associated, transitional alveolar epithelial cell state in pulmonary fibrosis. Nat Cell Biol 22, 934–946 (2020). 10.1038/s41556-020-0542-8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Toth A. et al. Alveolar epithelial progenitor cells require Nkx2–1 to maintain progenitor-specific epigenomic state during lung homeostasis and regeneration. Nat Commun 14, 8452 (2023). 10.1038/s41467-023-44184-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Riemondy K. A. et al. Single cell RNA sequencing identifies TGFbeta as a key regenerative cue following LPS-induced lung injury. JCI Insight 5 (2019). 10.1172/jci.insight.123637 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Hoffman E. T. et al. Aberrant intermediate alveolar epithelial cells promote pathogenic activation of lung fibroblasts in preclinical fibrosis models. Nat Commun 16, 8710 (2025). 10.1038/s41467-025-63735-1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Chen H. et al. KRT8 Serves as a Novel Biomarker for LUAD and Promotes Metastasis and EMT via NF-kappaB Signaling. Front Oncol 12, 875146 (2022). 10.3389/fonc.2022.875146 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Watson J. K. et al. Clonal Dynamics Reveal Two Distinct Populations of Basal Cells in Slow-Turnover Airway Epithelium. Cell Rep 12, 90–101 (2015). 10.1016/j.celrep.2015.06.011 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Ting C. et al. Fatal COVID-19 and Non-COVID-19 Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Is Associated with Incomplete Alveolar Type 1 Epithelial Cell Differentiation from the Transitional State without Fibrosis. Am J Pathol 192, 454–467 (2022). 10.1016/j.ajpath.2021.11.014 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Ting C. et al. Biomarkers Unveil Insights into Pathology of Transitional Epithelial States in Pulmonary Fibrosis. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 210, 687–690 (2024). 10.1164/rccm.202310-1839LE [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Wang F. Regulation of Epithelial Transitional States in Murine and Human Pulmonary Fibrosis. The Journal of Clinical Investigation (2023). [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Delorey T. M. et al. COVID-19 tissue atlases reveal SARS-CoV-2 pathology and cellular targets. Nature 595, 107–113 (2021). 10.1038/s41586-021-03570-8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Konkimalla A. et al. Transitional cell states sculpt tissue topology during lung regeneration. Cell Stem Cell 30, 1486–1502 e1489 (2023). 10.1016/j.stem.2023.10.001 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Munger J. S. et al. The integrin alpha v beta 6 binds and activates latent TGF beta 1: a mechanism for regulating pulmonary inflammation and fibrosis. Cell 96, 319–328 (1999). 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)80545-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Reed N. I. et al. The alphavbeta1 integrin plays a critical in vivo role in tissue fibrosis. Sci Transl Med 7, 288ra279 (2015). 10.1126/scitranslmed.aaa5094 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Kathiriya J. J. et al. Human alveolar type 2 epithelium transdifferentiates into metaplastic KRT5+ basal cells. Nat Cell Biol 24, 10–23 (2022). 10.1038/s41556-021-00809-4 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Vannan A. et al. Image-based spatial transcriptomics identifies molecular niche dysregulation associated with distal lung remodeling in pulmonary fibrosis. bioRxiv (2023). 10.1101/2023.12.15.571954 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Jiang P. et al. Ineffectual Type 2-to-Type 1 Alveolar Epithelial Cell Differentiation in Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis: Persistence of the KRT8(hi) Transitional State. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 201, 1443–1447 (2020). 10.1164/rccm.201909-1726LE [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Huang K. Y. & Petretto E. Cross-species integration of single-cell RNA-seq resolved alveolar-epithelial transitional states in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol 321, L491–L506 (2021). 10.1152/ajplung.00594.2020 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Lam M., Mansell A. & Tate M. D. Preclinical Mouse Model of Silicosis. Methods Mol Biol 2691, 111–120 (2023). 10.1007/978-1-0716-3331-1_9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Li B. et al. A suitable silicosis mouse model was constructed by repeated inhalation of silica dust via nose. Toxicol Lett 353, 1–12 (2021). 10.1016/j.toxlet.2021.09.014 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Sugimoto N. et al. IL-9 Blockade Suppresses Silica-induced Lung Inflammation and Fibrosis in Mice. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol 60, 232–243 (2019). 10.1165/rcmb.2017-0287OC [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Baum L. & Arnold T. C. in StatPearls (2025). [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Handra C. M., Gurzu I. L., Chirila M. & Ghita I. Silicosis: New Challenges from an Old Inflammatory and Fibrotic Disease. Front Biosci (Landmark Ed) 28, 96 (2023). 10.31083/j.fbl2805096 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Weissman D. N. Progressive massive fibrosis: An overview of the recent literature. Pharmacol Ther 240, 108232 (2022). 10.1016/j.pharmthera.2022.108232 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Hasegawa Y. et al. Pulmonary osteoclast-like cells in silica induced pulmonary fibrosis. Sci Adv 10, eadl4913 (2024). 10.1126/sciadv.adl4913 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Liberti D. C. et al. Alveolar epithelial cell fate is maintained in a spatially restricted manner to promote lung regeneration after acute injury. Cell Rep 35, 109092 (2021). 10.1016/j.celrep.2021.109092 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Kantrow S. P., Shen Z., Jagneaux T., Zhang P. & Nelson S. Neutrophil-mediated lung permeability and host defense proteins. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol 297, L738–745 (2009). 10.1152/ajplung.00045.2009 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Herrero R. & Matute-Bello G. How to measure alterations in alveolar barrier function as a marker of lung injury. Curr Protoc Toxicol 63, 24 23 21–24 23 15 (2015). 10.1002/0471140856.tx2403s63 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Matute-Bello G. et al. An official American Thoracic Society workshop report: features and measurements of experimental acute lung injury in animals. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol 44, 725–738 (2011). 10.1165/rcmb.2009-0210ST [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Herrero R., Sanchez G. & Lorente J. A. New insights into the mechanisms of pulmonary edema in acute lung injury. Ann Transl Med 6, 32 (2018). 10.21037/atm.2017.12.18 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Feinstein A. & Munn E. A. Conformation of the free and antigen-bound IgM antibody molecules. Nature 224, 1307–1309 (1969). 10.1038/2241307a0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Jin S. et al. Inference and analysis of cell-cell communication using Cell-Chat. Nat Commun 12, 1088 (2021). 10.1038/s41467-021-21246-9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Jin S., Plikus M. V. & Nie Q. CellChat for systematic analysis of cell-cell communication from single-cell transcriptomics. Nat Protoc 20, 180–219 (2025). 10.1038/s41596-024-01045-4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Browaeys R., Saelens W. & Saeys Y. NicheNet: modeling intercellular communication by linking ligands to target genes. Nat Methods 17, 159–162 (2020). 10.1038/s41592-019-0667-5 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Tsukui T., Wolters P. J. & Sheppard D. Alveolar fibroblast lineage orchestrates lung inflammation and fibrosis. Nature 631, 627–634 (2024). 10.1038/s41586-024-07660-1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Grazioli S. et al. CYR61 (CCN1) overexpression induces lung injury in mice. Am. J. Physiol.-Lung Cell. Mol. Physiol. 308, L759–L765 (2015). 10.1152/ajplung.00190.2014 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Kulkarni T. et al. The senescence-associated matricellular protein CCN1 in plasma of human subjects with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Respir. Med. 161, 105821 (2020). 10.1016/j.rmed.2019.105821 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Jaffar J. et al. Matrix metalloproteinase-7 is increased in lung bases but not apices in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. ERJ Open Res. 8, 00191–02022 (2022). 10.1183/23120541.00191-2022 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Pardo A. et al. Up-Regulation and Profibrotic Role of Osteopontin in Human Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis. PLoS Med. 2, e251 (2005). 10.1371/journal.pmed.0020251 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Tang Z., Xia Z., Wang X. & Liu Y. The critical role of osteopontin (OPN) in fibrotic diseases. Cytokine Growth Factor Rev. 74, 86–99 (2023). 10.1016/j.cytogfr.2023.08.007 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Bailey J. I. et al. Profibrotic monocyte-derived alveolar macrophages are expanded in patients with persistent respiratory symptoms and radiographic abnormalities after COVID-19. Nat Immunol 25, 2097–2109 (2024). 10.1038/s41590-024-01975-x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Cui H. et al. TREM2 promotes lung fibrosis via controlling alveolar macrophage survival and pro-fibrotic activity. Nat Commun 16, 1761 (2025). 10.1038/s41467-025-57024-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Joshi N. et al. A spatially restricted fibrotic niche in pulmonary fibrosis is sustained by M-CSF/M-CSFR signalling in monocyte-derived alveolar macrophages. Eur Respir J 55 (2020). 10.1183/13993003.00646-2019 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Warheit-Niemi H. I. et al. Fibrotic lung disease inhibits immune responses to staphylococcal pneumonia via impaired neutrophil and macrophage function. JCI Insight 7 (2022). 10.1172/jci.insight.152690 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Street K. et al. Slingshot: cell lineage and pseudotime inference for single-cell transcriptomics. BMC Genomics 19, 477 (2018). 10.1186/s12864-018-4772-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Bézieux H. R. d., Berge K. V. d., Street K. & Dudoit S. Trajectory inference across multiple conditions with condiments: differential topology, progression, differentiation, and expression. bioRxiv, 2021.2003.2009.433671 (2021). 10.1101/2021.03.09.433671 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Elitz A. et al. Early cell autonomous and niche-mediated alveolar epithelial response to influenza infection in primary lung organoids. bioRxiv, 2025.2010.2024.684481 (2025). 10.1101/2025.10.24.684481 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Warheit-Niemi H. I. et al. The chromatin remodeling complex PRC2 safeguards cell fate in alveolar epithelial type 2 cells. bioRxiv, 2026.2003.2003.708777 (2026). 10.64898/2026.03.03.708777 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Peng F. et al. Transcriptomic signature-guided depletion of intermediate alveolar epithelial cells ameliorates pulmonary fibrosis in mice. Nat Commun (2026). 10.1038/s41467-026-68354-y [DOI] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplement 1

Articles from bioRxiv are provided here courtesy of Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Preprints

RESOURCES